RSA Authentication Manager 7.1

Similar Questions

• Cisco ACS 5.1 and RSA Authentication Manager 6.1

  Hi all

  We recently had a Cisco Secure ACS 1120 and I improved the Unit 5.1 5.0 with all your support

  Now, I need to integrate Cisco ACS 5.1 with RSA Authentication Manager 6.1. I have config file of RSA ACE Server successfully downloaded and exported to 1120 ACS.

  I also added as NetOS Agent ACS in the RSA server during the process, I found a few warnings. The ACE Server is not able to resolve the IP address to the name (is it necessary?).

  I have not created any file of secret key for communication between FAC and RSA and I used encryption is FOR.

  Now, when I log into ACS and search for devices in the identity store sequences I am not able to get Sever Token RSA.

  Let me know what was wrong, where can I fix and also please tell me what is the communciaction between the RSA and ACS?

  Hoping that you guys help me as usual when I'm in a hurry...

  Sree

  Were you able to successfully create the RSA identity server. After selecting the sdconf.rec and you press on submit what happened? The RSA instance created OK?

  If you go to

  Users and identity stores > external identity stores > RSA SecurID Token servers, what do you see in the list?

• Cisco Secure ACS groups 5.1 Active Directory and RSA Authentication Manager 7.1 for profiles

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style - qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 cm 0 cm 5.4pt 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0 cm; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; font-size: 11.0pt; font family: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-make: minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-make: minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-make: minor-latin ;}"}

  Hello

  I'm deploying an ACS connected to an RSA AuthManager (that is connected to an Active Directory domain)

  I create several groups within the Active Directory server, I try to give to users for their groups different access rights.

  I tried to define an access policy "NetOp/NetAdm" and two authorization rules:

  Rule-1 AD - AD1:ExternalGroups contains all dir. INTRA/groups/NETOP 'Auth for net operators' 0

  Rule 2 AD - AD1:ExternalGroups contains all dir. INTRA/groups/NETADM 'Auth net admin' 0

  Default: refuse

  In the identity, I have configured the RSA identity source, so that users get authenticated by the RSA Authentication Manager.

  But I still refuse to get access, RSA authentication is successful, but the group membership, active directory does not work, even with the unix attributes or group principal defined for the user.

  My question is this valid configuration scenario? Is there another way to define several profiles according to the Group of users of external source?

  The stages of monitoring:

  Measures

  Request for access received RADIUS 11001

  11017 RADIUS creates a new session

  Assess Service selection strategy

  15004 Matched rule

  Access to Selected 15012 - NetOp/NetAdm service policy

  Evaluate the politics of identity

  15004 Matched rule

  15013 selected identity Store - server RSA

  24500 Authenticating user on the server's RSA SecurID.

  24501 a session is established with the server's RSA SecurID.

  24506 check successful operation code

  24505 user authentication succeeded.

  24553 user record has been cached

  24502 with RSA SecurID Server session is closed

  Authentication 22037 spent

  22023 proceed to the recovery of the attribute

  24628 user cache not enabled in the configuration of the RADIUS identity token store.

  Identity sequence 22016 completed an iteration of the IDStores

  Evaluate the strategy of group mapping

  15006 set default mapping rule

  Authorization of emergency policy assessment

  15042 no rule has been balanced

  Evaluation of authorization policy

  15006 set default mapping rule

  15016 selected the authorization - DenyAccess profile

  15039 selected authorization profile is DenyAccess

  11003 returned RADIUS Access-Reject

  Thank you

  Christophe

  I think you need to do is to create a sequence of identity with RSA as a selection in

  Authentication and recovery research list of attributes and AD in the additional attribute list recovery research. Then select this sequence as a result of the politics of identity for the service

• VI and RSA authentication client

  I have a firewall between all of my ESX hosts and vCenter vCenter then only can communicate with any host ESX service console interface. Administrators can connect their VI the vCenter Client, but I want them to run two facto authentication when connecting to the vCenter through the VI Client. Is this possible?

  I don't want to rely on RSA auth when connecting to vCenter via RDP as you will thus limit the connections for 2 sessions.

  Hello

  SecurID for the vCenter\Virtual Center is not available. Right now, I recommend putting the vCenter server and ESX management on a 'management LAN' consoles separate and using a firewall that supports SecurID RDP in the lan management. To work around the RDP, you mentioned, I would create XP workstations in lan management. If you use the view, you could create a pool of admin of computers residing in the management of local network, and you can use SecurID to get to them. View supports SecurID.

  Mike

  I work at the RSA

• RSA authentication

  Hello

  Is it possible for cisco ASA supported rsa second factor authentication for access to the server.

  That is to say that the servers will be available some network segments, after the first level

  name of user-password prompt and at the entrance to the user of these credentials, the SAA must

  calls again for a second authentication.

  The ASA will invite to this second authentication?

  Thank you

  For non - VPN traffic through the ASA supports something called "match of football aaa for authentication" method I haven't personally used only learned about CCNP security, but there is a nice note of TAC tech on it here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a0080ba6110.shtml

  You should be able to use it with the source of authentication (aaa server) is RSA.

• ASA SSL VPN with RSA authentication

  All those implemented SSL VPN on a device of the ASA using remote Securid tokens? The technical sheets indicate native RSA can be used for authentication, but this works with SSL VPN?

  Thank you

  Try this link

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/prod_release_note09186a0080688004.html

• ACS 4.2 RSA Authentication and LDAP group mapping

  Hello

  I have a firewall, PaloAlto, with overall protection enabled (SSL - VPN) feature

  I use Cisco Secure ACS as a proxy for the RSA SecurID authentication.

  After authentication is try to map ad through LDAP query groups.

  The question I've found, is that the user I get with user authentication has no field:

  Show user ip-user-mapping all | mbm60380 game

  10.240.1.24 vsys1 UIA 2388 2388 domain\mbm60380

  10.240.1.1 vsys1 UIA 2101 2101 domain\mbm60380

  10.240.250.1 mbm60380 2590859 2590859 vsys2 GP

  But the list of users that I receive from the LDAP query includes the domain prefix:

  See the user group name domain\group1 property

  short name: domain\group1

  [1] domain\aag60368

  [2] domain\ced61081

  [3] domain\jas61669

  [4] domain\mbm60380

  [5] domain\pmc61693

  [6] domain\vcm60984

  I would like to create the user with the area of GBA but it must delete the domain before querying the RSA server, as it does not support field stripping.

  I tried to fix this on the Palo Alto firewall without success.

  I'm trying to run Cisco Secure ACS 4.2 changing, but it did not work either:

  RSA servers are configured as an external database.  They are not defined in the groups of network devices.

  Can I set up domain stripping for queries servers RSA?

  Thank you

  Hello

  I think it should work, but it is a bit awkward:

  Create an entry in the Distribution of Proxy in the Network Configuration.

  DOMAIN\\USER *.

  Prefix

  Before returning to the AAA server, from there to authenticate to the server RSA without the domain prefix.

  Make sense?

  Thank you

  Chris

• Authentication Manager + GemPlus smart card reader

  Hi all!

  I was reading about View Manager Auth integration with RSA SecurID. I did some tests and worked like a charm.

  But what I could use solution gemplus smart card to authenticate users?

  Thank you.

  Best,

  Eduardo.

  If you found this information useful, please consider awarding points to 'Correct' or 'useful '.

  Hi Eduardo,

  VMware View supports RSA SecurID auth method. 2 factor.

  It also supports the opening of session of smart card on the desktop with SSO from the client to the office.

  There is an information guide to smart card on the vmware Web site explaining that: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&ved=0CBYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vmware.com%2Ffiles%2Fpdf%2Fview_cert_authentication.pdf&rct=j&q=SmartcardVMwareView + guide & ei = Vx75S6XuGMuLOOeNxZUM & usg = AFQjCNGqupwPpQBH34PP2mFe3zv1yIGIaw & sig2 = NHQsN1XjYLXgaXIx_5xqoA

  Kind regards

  Christoph

  Don't forget to assign points if this answer was helpful for you.

  Blog:

  http://Communities.VMware.com/blogs/Dommermuth | http://www.thatsmyview.NET/

• SSO with WebVPN ASA using RSA tokens

  Current configuration:

  Chip & PIN the user authenticates for-> ASA5510 8.2 Clientless VPN-> past to the 7.2 SDI RSA Authentication Manager.

  I've got of authentication works great, at the first connection, users can connect with their AD usernames and RSA tokens and generate his pin code.

  We used to use ACS express and their advertising information for vpn authentication, but now we have to two factors of authentication.

  Is it possible to some how to maintain SSO so that when the user authenticates via its RSA token they can always browse through OWA, Sharepoint, CIFS (file share) without having to enter their credentials for the AD?

  Any help or information is much appreciated.

  Thank you

  You can activate the field "internal password" on the customization of WebVPN and also re-name-the ("Password AD" for example) and then configure the entries in the auto-code of access for internal URLS on NTLM.  Such that when the guest servers the WebVPN session will send the user name used to connect to the ASA but send the internal password captured during the connection instead of the password used to connect to the WebVPN himself.

  The only problem I saw during the test, there is no seam to be a graceful way to establishing a password incorrect or missing, then NTLM would fail and fall back basic over ssl.   Finally it would block the AD accounts based on URL how much the user has tried when the password entered when the connection is bad or missing (because it failed to connect to the WebVPN).

• ACS 5.5 does support RSA AM 8.1?

  Hello

  does anyboby know if RSA AM 8.x is supported by ACS 5.5?

  I did not find a supported Version of RSA in Documentation/Release Notes.

  I imported sdconf.rec von RSA AM 8.1 outdoor store config but secret of node identity is not created/redeemed.

  Authentication fails with "The unsupported authentication method" on the RSA.

  Thank you

  Mike

  I think that the information you are looking for below:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_contro...

  • RSA Authentication Manager 7.x series

  Thank you

• View 5.1 with RSA Securid 7.1

  We deploy VMware View with RSA Securid 7.1 5.1. We have a RSA and RSA 7.1 installed agent on the server and display the VM VDI and to challenge the value. The View Manager is configured to use RSA according to the doc.

  http://www.RSA.com/rsasecured/guides/imp_pdfs/RSA%20SecurID%20Ready%20Implementation%20Guide-view%20Manager%203.PDF

  We also use Cisco VXC 2111 zero clients (connected to the Cisco voip phone). The thin client connects and manages to authenticate with the password. However, the client also asked that the password and then passes the user on the desktop.

  I can't find info on how to do to prevent it ask the password too. Any ideas?

  EDIT: I discovered that the Cisco VXC 2111 running 4.6 View Client. I wonder if this is the problem?

  I'll have to test it with a Wyse P20 and see if there is a difference.

  1. with RSA SecurID authentication, find password guests once SecurID authentication is complete. The password is necessary in order to perform SSO to the virtual office. If the view does not request password, SSO is not possible and the user must sign - one for each virtual desktop in any case. SecurID represents an additional authentication at the beginning of the sequence.

  2. you need not install the RSA Agent on view connection server. View has all that he needs to perform SecurID authentication against RSA Authentication manager.

  3. it is a very old document you are referencing. It's to see 3.0. See here for the latest documentation for each version of the view. http://KB.VMware.com/kb/2003455

  I hope this helps.

  Select this option.

• VMWare View with RSA SecurID integration

  Hi all.

  We try to make VMware View to authenticate users through RSA SecurID according to the attached document. However, it is not clear where to put the node Secret file that is generated on the RSA Authentication Manager server? It is exported in the form of .rec file and is protected by a password, but server configuration view has all fields to load the node secret file. Should I simply rename the securid .rec file and put in %SystemRoot%\System32\securid? But how to do View Server to decrypt this file by using the password then?

  On the RSA server, I see in the newspapers:

  2010-03-12 08:05:49U-

  ---

  /viewservername.company.com-

  ---

  12/03/2010 03:05:49U verification of node doesn't have a rsa - ace - server.company.com

  RSA doc says

  "An incompatibility between the secret of node stored on an authentication manager and subsequently stored on an Agent Host may occur if you delete and re-create an Agent Host, or if you accidentally delete a secret file of the nodes. The incompatibility prevents messages between devices which is decrypted and causes the Agent Host deny access to all users who attempt to log on. Node of that check failed is recorded in the audit trail.

  Hello

  for me it is look like this attached image.

  MCP, VCP

• Separate authentication for external and internal users?

  Hello
  
  Asked me to come with a CEP for a client who wants a new system APEX is accessible to internal and external users. The client security team want to have two separate copies of the request for the APEX and both copies of the auditor of the APEX on separate databases on two separate servers from Weblogic to support different security requirements for both internal and external users. I don't think that is necessary as APEX should be able to impose conditions depending on what type of user is connected, by questioning the cookie passed in which could contain a flag to say whether the user is internally and externally. In addition, CAE can be used to further restrict external access.
  
  The middleware for the customer solution is managed by a third party, who have made the following recommendations:
  
  The domestic channel requires SSO to configure on WebLogic while the outside lane. Internal users must be validated on Active Directory, with RSA Authentication Manager used for external users. We cannot set up a listener APEX instance to use and not to use SINGLE sign-on at the same time. Two applications are necessary.
  
  Now, I understand from my understanding limited the listener of the APEX, it is possible to implement different rules depending on the type of user to access. However, might just as well not be managed from Magnatune APEX? We could write a custom authentication procedure that verifies again road and the SSO user authentication cookie or otherwise, as required.
  
  So my question is this: can it really be necessary to implement two versions of an APEX application, with two distinct on different servers APEX headphones, to meet the security requirements of separate here? Ultimately at the end of the day if that's what the customer wants, we have to build it, but I'm looking to reassure them via a CEP that won't be necessary. I think that the seller of hardware/middleware recommend that the client just because they do not know available in APEX itself custom authentication options.
  
  Please forgive any simplifications or the lack of details in the above - I'm more a developer APEX as a person of the infrastructure and a bit of a 'newbie' where the listener APEX is concerned. All advice gratefully appreciated!
  
  Graham.

  Hi Graham,

  It's a matter of people paranoid how and to what extent they trust their own infrastructure. Things could be easier than to split the environments, but I don't know if I just depends on the cookie because cookie can be easily rigged. But I think that the following architecture would be safe:
  1 internal users connect APEX listener somehow security team requires, come to APEX and maybe be identified using the internal IP address (range). To simulate the INVESTIGATION period should be difficult for external users.
  2. external users connect APEX listener through a defined gateway, preferably a proxy. All future requests through this gateway would be considered external users.
  You may add additional logic to the proxy, for example use something like 'mod_headers' in Apache HTTPD to add a page header to requests, so that you may identify as external users.
  You could, of course, also put it the other Tower and allow internal users to use some proxy to enforce certain rules of IP based address, or perhaps a few additional references as authentication for access to the proxy (which again could be transparent user in AD-configuration, at least if you stick with IE).

  You can easily implement the separation in your custom authentication process. But this architecture also allows some other compromise: even if someone does not trust your application logic to handle two types of application successfully, you can also use the proxy to enforce the specific call for an application id. Certainly you don't need to duplicate the infrastructure...
  Most of the companies already have a proxy for external users, for example to activate SSL and to hide other internal resources, for load balancing,... so I think you just need to put some configuration of the existing infrastructure and end up needing no component additional. Even if there is no proxy and yet, it would be an element of very light weight, easy to handle.

  So far, all this has nothing to do with the earpiece of the APEX. It's 'just' a web front-end for the instance of the APEX in the database. I wouldn't put a logic of network security in this service, but the split things upward front. The APEX listener can be patched to add some logic, but which was not supported.

  I think that this would work and should be sufficient for most of the safety requirements.
  If my picture was not painted understandable, let me know.

  -Udo

• Sequence of identity store does not work

  Hello guys,.

  I found following problem and can not solve.

  I installed two ACS 5.3.0.40 cluster (internal Build ID: B.839) hardware appliances.

  I created the identity store sequence in this way:

  • List of authentication method - based password
  • Authentication and recovery research list of attributes:
    • First server providing the SMS authentication (via the Radius Protocol)
    • Secondly, in the order is RSA Authentication Manager (SecurID token twofactor authentication)

  • List of recovering additional attribute - internal users

  • Advanced options:

    • If the current identity store access failed - store continue to the following identity in the sequence

    • For the recovery of the attribute only: option Checked - if internal user/host not found or disabled then out of sequence and treats them like "User Not Found".

  My idea is this - user will try authneticate, sequence identity will be initiated - if the user does not exist on the SMS server, then it should be authneticated through RSA AM. On the end of additional attributes should be taken account in the ACS internal database (it is used for authorization).

  Problem is that if authentication agains first store sequence identity server will fail, second sequence server is never contacted. If the user exists on the first server auth. connection will pass without problem.

  I'm tempted to change the order of the sequences, but if RSA AM is first and SMS Server second situation is always the same, as before, the only user on RSA AM going.

  Newspaper I see that only the first server is mentioned in the item store of identity (authentication summary).

  Event session saying (if the SMS server is the first) - Radius for the USER authentication failed: breskmic MAC: AUTHTYPE: failed authentication Radius

  Authentication dedails: Access Policy - selected Indetity stores - both servers are properly mentioned

  Steps to follow:

  • 24613 authenticate to the RADIUS server in token failed.
  • 22057 advanced option that is configured for an application from the failure of authentication is used.
  • 22061 the option 'Refuse' Advanced is set in the case of a request for authentication has failed.
  • 11003 returned RADIUS Access-Reject
  • It comes to the end of the log - server RSA if AM is the first in the order, then the result is the same.

  Can someone help me with this problem, I'm doing something wrong or is this a bug in ACS?

  There is an option of advanced configuration for the RADIUS Server token:

  This storage of identity differentiates between 'authentication failed' and 'user not found' when an authentication attempt is rejected. Among the options below, select how a rejection of authentication of the identity store must be interpreted by FAC for the politics of identity of treatment and reports.

  Treat dismisses them as "authentication failed".

  Treat dismisses them as "user not found

  You must check the option to treat reject them as 'user not found' is selected

• ASA public 8.4 + key RSA for the SSH user authentication

  I saw in another post and the configuration guide in the community of support this key public RSA authentication is in favor of the SSH sessions at 8.4 and after.  I tried this implementation on an ASA 8.4 and a 9.1 ASA and I get the same error on both.  I tried specifying SSH version 2 to see if that is the question, but I still get the error.  Y at - there a step I'm missing?

  Here is the result of the configuration commands:

  ciscoasa (config) #username test nopassword privilege 15

  attributes of test #username ciscoasa (config)

  ciscoasa(config-username) # ssh publickey authentication

  ^

  ERROR: % name host not valid

  The above links:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/2150480

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/access_aaa.html#wp1053558

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa91/configuration/General/aaa_servers.html#wp1176050

  Thank you!

  My version is 8.4 (4).

  Tried to do it on another vith asa 9.1 and no luck.

  Fact a little research, and it turns out that this feature was launched in 8.4 (4) and not available for later versions.

  So, probably, your 8.4 is meadow (4) output and it was not available at the time and in your 9.1 is not available either)))

  Here is the document:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/roadmap/asa_new_features.html

  Take a look at the table 10.