Sefl-signed ssl certificate is not possible?

Similar Questions

• CA-signed SSL certificates on vCenter 5.1 installation (server or device)

  I recently updated my 5.0 to 5.1 ESXi ESXi hosts and they all kept CA-signed SSL certificates that I installed previously. I did a new install of vCenter 5.1 server where the box even ran SSO, inventory, vCenter Server and Manager Update Services. After installing, everything worked perfectly except that none of the vCenter services used my CA-signed SSL certificate - only 5.1 ESXi hosts had these.

  So, I followed the instructions in replacing default vCenter 5.1 and ESXi certificates PDF found at http://www.vmware.com/resources/techresources/10318. The document is terrible. For example, page 10 lists the locations by three default certificates SSL on Windows 2008. None of these paths are correct. The first a typo of extra space between "Program" and "Data" and the other two say "Program Files" when they should have been "ProgramData". This is just the beginning of the problems.

  If you follow the instructions to the letter, you'll break vCenter. I got frustrated and thought I'd give the vCenter 5.1 device a shot. With regard to the Certificates SSL signed by CA, it was worse. The vCenter 5.1 device can even automatically generate a new SSL certificate if you change the host name (turn on generation auto-certificat, change of hostname and restart). It gives an error 653 during the boot process and keeps the original of the certificate. Even bother trying the steps on page 18 of the above-mentioned guide - you will get just the same mistake 653.

  It seems to me that VMware did not all tests around the CA-signed SSL certificate on vCenter 5.1 installation. It's amazing to me that the installation of the SSL certificate is so tedious for ESXi and vCenter when vShield Manager 5.1 has a very simple process that works well (and is similar to the installation procedure for Certificate SSL on the DRAC, ASR, breeding various firewalls, etc.).

  I did a lot of research on Google and found various articles on the installation of the SSL certificate, but most were based on GA pre - 5.1 products. If you have any installation of certificates SSL CA-signed success with vCenter Server or device 5.1 GA, let me know how you got around some of these issues. Please indicate if your vCenter Server or device will run on a 5.1 GA ESXi host as well. Please do not answer about vCenter 5.0 - I had no problem with SSL certificates (other than it was more painful to be).

  Thanks in advance,

  Nate

  Finally I managed to install giving him to 127.0.0.1 instead of the period of INVESTIGATION, accessible from the outside of the vCenter server, it's very well in my case the vCenter and VUM server are on the same VM but its not exactly ideal for deployments of more large.

• Thunderbird does not recognize a self-signed SSL certificate

  Dear support,

  I have a very strange problem that I don't understand.

  I run a server ISP offering IMAP and TLS/SSL HTTPS encryption. Both services use the same SSL certificate issued by RapidSSL/GeoTrust Server edward.ennabe.de

  When I open an https connection to the server, Firefox correctly solves the certificate chain and use the certification authority root Equifax (which is correct).
  However, when I try to connect to a mailbox via Thunderbird, all I get in the hierarchy of certificates is my server edward.ennabe.de. I don't think that it's "working as intended", or is it?

  Is something wrong with my Thunderbird or My Dovecot configuration? What is really strange that firefox recognizes it correctly.

  Thanks in advance

  Kind regards

  ZeroEnna

  In Thunderbird, click the 'Détails' tab in the display of the certificate.
  See all certificates of CA listed in the field "Certificate hierarchy" also installed in your Thunderbird certificate store?
  When checking this look for the tab 'authorities '.
  If there are no certificates listed in the missing chain in the Thunderbird certificate store (for some reason any), you can try to export it in Firefox and import them into Thunderbird.

• Red vCenter - unable to check CA (PSC) signed SSL certificate vCenter VMware

  I am trying to deploy a new Horizon view 7 based on vSphere environment 6 U2 to replace our pod 5.3 view existing. I have a Windows Server vCenter Server with separate PSC of Windows. I used the PSC signed the SSL certificate for vCenter and downloaded and added the certificate authority root for the required workstations and servers via Group Policy. If I navigate to vCenter from your desktop with CA root installed all is well on the HTTPS front. I added this vCenter Server in my environment view but it appears in red on the dashboard view. I clicked on the vcenter Server and checked the certificate, but at no time should you go green. The two connection servers have the CA root installed and if I launch a browser from the connection to the server itself, then navigate to the vCenter FQDN certificate is approved.

  Any ideas?

  I cannot create pools for this reason that the view is not currently communicate with vCenter as well and it won't let me choose a virtual machine model.

  If you need to know more details please let me know and I'll happily supply.

  Thanks in advance.

  Having re-read the Horizon view documentation 7 to confirm that I had taken the correct steps already, I decided to restart both of my new server connection, that solved the problem. My vCenter server now shows in green in the dashboard and I was able to successful deployment of desktop computers.

• How can I set up email when the field on the SSL certificate does not match?

  I am a customer of Dreamhost and don't know if our situation is unique or not, but both smtp and imap are "mail.example.com" even if the SSL certificate belongs to ' *. DreamHost.com'.

  I was not able to set up the email on my flame app because I get the following error:

  > Could not establish a connection with "mail.example.com". There may be a problem with your network or server.

  I think the problem is the lag of domain name, but I can't find a way to accept the certificate.

  Hello!

  According to the official DreamHost wiki site , you can try this (cut-and-pasted from the page). If it doesn't work, there are still other options available on the page.

  To connect to the mail server using the name of the server dreamhost.com instead of messagerie.votre_domaine.fr.

  Use the following steps to determine the name of the server to use:

     In the DreamHost Control Panel
     Click "Account Status" in the upper right hand corner
     Look for the "Your Email Culster:" at the bottom of the list.
     Find your cluster in the table below.
     Use the server name for the incoming server in your mail program.
  

  Name of Server Cluster e-mail
  homiemail-sub3 sub3.mail.dreamhost.com
  homiemail-sub4 sub4.mail.dreamhost.com
  homiemail-sub5 sub5.mail.dreamhost.com
  homiemail-master homie.mail.dreamhost.com

• Does anyone know if the version of Cisco Clean Access Server supports the 4.1 (8) SHA - 256 signed SSL certificates?

  Yes, I know they are very old servers and technically, we should move away from CASES in total. But unfortunately, it's an environment I inherited, and I am now dealing with issues.  Because of the requirement to move away from sha - 1 signed certificates that I need to replace my existing certs, certs signature sha-256.  But before I do that I would like to know if anyone knows if CASE version 4.1 (8) supports SHA - 256 certificates?  I did check the release notes, but there is no mention of the supported versions of SHA, etc..  I tried TACS but no joy there either, etc..

  Hello Rafael,.

  SHA - 2 signed the certificate of support was added in 4.7.2 for SCS and CAM.

  We have filed a default document to have it documented in the release notes.
  CSCud99946    Note of support for the NAC should say we support certs of SHA - 2

  Kind regards

  Jousset

• HPDM: HPDM replace self signed SSL certificates for server HDPM and master repository

  I am trying to replace the automatically generated self-signed certificates (issued to DM) issued by DM server HDPM and master repository.  I'm NOT arbitration FTPS, HTTPS embedded HPDM or CERT Thin Client Agent server.

  I already have CERT for the installation of our own internal domain CA for FTPS in IIS and the built-in Apache HTTPS server.  These work properly and pass tests of repository for both protocols.  I also have questions for Thin Clients of our internal CA very well.

  I am interested in the HPDM real server cert and cert master repository. These are generated automatically when the two services start.  They use a very weak MD5 hash and key RSA 1024.  I can't find any documentation around that, with the exception of troubleshooting, in which you can remove these certificates restart services and they will be regenerated.

  Here are the paths certs\key
  HPDM % install Path%\MasterRepositoryController\Controller.crt (Cert repository)

  HPDM % install Path%\MasterRepositoryController\Controller.key (repository key)

  HPDM % install Path%\MasterRepositoryController\Client.crt (HPDM Server Cert)

  HPDM % install Path%\Server\Bin\hpdmskey.keystore (Both HPDM server and repository Certs and keys) (not sure what format it is in.  It is not PEM and P12 ok I can say)

  There are also some HPDM % install Path%\Server\bin\hpdmcert.key.  Don't know what it is.  It's the key to the server HPDM but deleting it does nothing and it is never re auto generated in one of my tests.

  I am able to replace the Controller.crt and keys with my own files CA internal those emitted very well.  The service started and no errors occur.  However if I replace the Client.cert (HPDM Server Cert) with my own service will start but there are Socket SSL errors in repository logs and the HPDM server could not connect to the master repository. I have no idea where the key file is supposed to be for HPDM Server Cert.

  Can anyone help with this?  I can't find the configuration files for the service to generate their own certificates.  If I did I would try at least to change the config to do not use MD5.

  Hello

  These certiricates between HPDM server and MRC are not designed for customizable. Please submite one scenario if you have concerns of security on it.

  Just for info:

  hpdmcert. Key is for communication between the server HPDM and gateway HPDM

  hpdmskey.keystore is for communication between the server HPDM and MRC

  server_keystore is for the commhucation between HPDM server and the Console HPDM

• VCSA 6.0: Replace external SSL by CA signed CERT certificates

  We would like to use third CA signed SSL certificates for our components of vSphere external (e.g. vSphere Web Client, web console,...), so that users with access vSphere need not trust to internal CA certificates. VSphere 5.5, there was a complicated but workable solution .

  For vSphere 6, some documentation on VMCA is available and it looks to replace Certificates SSL of Machine with personalized certificates, but I'm not completely sure if it's the best/recommended approach. Specifically, it seems that this approach always replaces a number of internal certificates, although I prefer to replace only the external certificates.

  Does anyone have experience with this?

  Looks like the way to go is by using the Certificate Manager tool (/ usr/lib/vmware-vmca/bin /-Certificate Manager) with option 1, replace the certificate of Machine SSL with certificate custom.

  Unfortunately, this generates an error:

  Error when changing Machine SSL Cert, please visit /var/log/vmware/vmcad/certificate-manager.log for more information.

  And the log shows:

  2015 03-13 T 22: 31:28.906Z INFO-Manager certificates command executed successfully

  2015 03-13 T 22: 31:28.906Z INFO-Manager certificates certificate backup created successfully

  2015 03-13 T 22: 31:28.907Z INFO-Manager certificates command duration: [' / usr/lib/vmware-vmafd/bin/dir-cli ', 'trustedcert', 'release', '-cert ',' / root/ssl/chain.crt', '-password ',' *']

  2015 03-13 T 22: 31:28.920Z INFO-Certificate Manager output of the command: -.

  2015 03-13 T 22: 31:28.921Z - Manager of certificates of ERROR

  2015 03-13 T 22: 31:28.921Z ERROR-certificate error when replacing Manager machine SSL Cert, please visit /var/log/vmware/vmcad/certificate-manager.log for more information.

  2015 03-13 T 22: 31:28.921Z certificate {} ERROR-Manager

  'resolution': null,

  'detail':]

  {

  'args':]

  ""

  ],

  "id": "install.ciscommon.command.errinvoke",

  "localized": "an error has occurred during the call to the external command:", "

  "translatable": "an error has occurred during the call to the external command: '%s' (0)»

  },

  "Error while publishing cert using dir - cli."

  ],

  'componentKey': null,

  'problemId': null

  }

  Not very useful, but the execution of this command for us to clarify:

  vc: ~ # /usr/lib/vmware-vmafd/bin/dir-cli trustedcert release - cert /root/ssl/chain.crt

  Enter the password for [email protected]:

  The file [/ root/ssl/chain.crt] contains more than 1 certificate

  If you want to publish a certificate chain, use the command "trustedcert post" with the option - string indicator.

  dir - cli failed. Possible error 13: Errors:

  LDAP error: confidentiality required

  Win Error: Operation failed with error ERROR_INVALID_DATA (13)

  Ah! We need - channel flag because we use a chain of CA certificates instead of a single root certificate. Set him certificate - Library Manager to include this option:

  "" vc: ~ # sed-i's /trustedcert/ / $/ \'--chain\', / ' /usr/lib/vmware/site-packages/cis/certificateManagerOps.py

  And possibly check this line 434 was edited to add this indicator:

  vc: ~ # vim + 434 /usr/lib/vmware/site-packages/cis/certificateManagerOps.py

  Now, all that's left is Manager certificates running again to take advantage of our CA-signed Cert!

• SSL certificates?

  Is it mandatory to configure/install CA signed SSL certificates in vCenter upgrade 5.1 to 5.5?  I don't remember doing this for 5.1 install.

  Thank you.

  Dan M.

  No it's not mandatory... free signed certificates are always present if you don't not CA signed those...

  Concerning

  Girish

• See 4.5 Security server problems since installing SSL certificate

  I'm having some very strange problems with my view view connection Server 4.5 (front and back) running. I hope someone could shed some light on the problem, because I have tried everything I know to do this job properly.

  Before installing a certificate self-signed server of external connection again, I was running the default VMware certificate. Everything worked very well in this configuration. I installed a new self-signed certificate and now I'm having intermittent problems, the connection to the server:

  1. in the connection from a windows machine I CAN reach the site URL/HTTP to download the client from the view. Once I run the client to view I got the following error: failed connection to connect to the server view. Network error.

  2. I tried to connect via the IP address of the server, ensure that the external URL is correct (everything worked fine before the installation of the SSL certificate).

  3. completely removed security server and reinstalled, restart the services etc. Still not connect on some machines. Connecting from a Wyse compatible iPad still works, never a problem.

  4. If I connect the VPN of the company on the machine that does not work, then launches the Client to view and connect everything works as it should. When I disconnect the VPN and try to connect again, I can connect very well! So I need to connect to the VPN to connect to browse... its really weird. I checked DNS etc and everything is identical with the default certificate. I did so that machines that have problems approve the certificate and I also followed the Cisco ASA firewall logs, I do not see happneing anything different between periods of work and does not.

  Someone at - he never lived something along these lines or can think of anything I can try?

  Thank you!

  I came across this same thing.  The conflict is between the customer to view and your new self-signed SSL certificate.  More precisely the thing causing the problem is the version of the wininet.dll file provided with IE8.  The wininet.dll file provided with IE8 causes some kind of conflict with the customer view 4.5 (if using other SSL certificate that the server generated one) and will not allow the client to view 4.5 software to connect to your server security.  I reported this to VMware (2 weeks ago) so that they should be aware of the problem.

  If you remove your new SSL certificate and return to the one created by the display server then everything works perfectly again.  If you are using a machine with IE6 or IE7 XP remove IE8, it also works very well.  I tried taking the file wininet.dll from XP SP3 IE6 machine and restore this file after installing IE8 and everything seemed to work ok, but probably not the best solution.

  Bottom line is until VMware resolves the conflict with their client to view, you may not use any SSL certificate (other than that of the server is) If you are going to connect to windows machines running IE8 or newer.

• Update of root certificate does not (error CAPI2 event ID 60)

  Hello

  I recently did a clean install of Windows 7 SP1 on a new system.
  I noticed that there are sites including https / SSL certificates do not seem valid where I don't expect it (for example BBC laboratories), using the two Chrome and IE.
  After some searching on the forum of other messages, I followed it down to a problem with Windows 7, do not automatically update root certificates installed. Specifically, using MMC event logging, CAPI2 event ID 60 (store) returns 5 "access denied." This causes then event ID 11 and 30 to not like the certificate chain fails to build and check.
  Other points to note:
  • Normal Windows updates work fine
  • Most of the sites using https / SSL works fine (i.e. a root certificates are installed with success - if those provided with Windows or have been updated since the installation I don't know)
  • I tried to disable all my firewall / antivirus programs where they prevented updates, no effect
  Anyone know a fix for this - I don't really want to having to perform a complete reinstallation :(
  Thank you!

  Thanks sirot,.

  Unfortunately, this does not work.
  In the end I just did a re-complete installation of Windows which seems to have solved the problem.

• How to get SSL certificates installed on VMware vCenter 6.0 device

  Hiya,

  I haveen strugling to SSL certificates installed for a few days now, it always seems to fail on the vpxd_servicecfg command.

  I followed tuts like: https://myvirtualife.net/2014/04/01/how-to-replace-default-vcsa-5-5-certificates-with-microsoft-ca-signed-certificates/

  There are more out there, but they all simular to the other. I followed it to the letter, but all I get is:

  vCenter: / ssl/vCenterSSO # / usr/sbin/vpxd_servicecfg change chain.pem rui.key certificate

  VC_CFG_RESULT = 650

  The only thing I can emagine is that there is a difference in vcenter 5.5 and 6.0, but else then I have don't know how to solve this problem.

  Can anyone help?

  Kind regards.

  This could be something a lot of your time, but I suggest you go to the k related in detail.

  VMware KB: Replacement of default certificates with CA-signed SSL certificates in vSphere 6.0

• Warning of SSL certificate when you download a picture of ESXi?

  Hi people,

  I have crossed all of installing vcenter, SSO, inventory, web, client Manager Update, etc and replaced all the SSL certificates using a series of excellent articles.

  http://www.derekseaman.com/2013/10/vSphere-5-5-install-PT-1-Introduction.html

  I think that it all works for me.  I have replaced SSL certificates on my 5.1 ESXi hosts and have added to the vcenter, no problem.

  I want to use Update Manager to upgrade hosts to 5.5.  I see this SSL certificate warning when you try to add the image of ESXi (photo attached).

  It makes me think that maybe my vcenter SSL certificate does not get replaced with success?

  I don't see this prompt anywhere, as the vsphere client connection.

  Check if all the comments?

  Thank you

  romatlo

  

  No response.  Close this thread.

• Requirments for URLLoader() on Android SSL certificate

  Recently the certificate SSL on my site https://www.jollysnpas.com has been updated and now all https requests, made by the URLLoader() on Android are denied. This is only a problem when running on a real android device.

  I try to get my hosting provider to investigate, however they may not be very useful so I hope someone here can determine why the new SSL certificate is rejected so I can get to fix their SSL certificate.

  to reproduce the error, the following code illustrates the problem.

  package

  {

  import flash.display.Sprite;

  import flash.events.Event;

  import flash.events.HTTPStatusEvent;

  import flash.events.IOErrorEvent;

  to import flash.events.ProgressEvent;

  import flash.events.SecurityErrorEvent;

  import flash.net.URLLoader;

  import flash.net.URLLoaderDataFormat;

  import flash.net.URLRequest;

  import flash.net.URLRequestMethod;

  to import flash.net.URLVariables;

  SerializableAttribute public class URLLoaderExample extends Sprite

  {

  private var loader: URLLoader;

  public void URLLoaderExample()

  {

  Super();

  var url: String = " " https://www.jollysnaps.com/ ";

  var request: URLRequest = new URLRequest (url);

  var requestVars:URLVariables = new URLVariables();

  Request.Data = requestVars;

  Request.Method = URLRequestMethod.POST;

  loader = new URLLoader();

  loader.dataFormat = URLLoaderDataFormat.TEXT;

  loader.addEventListener (ProgressEvent.PROGRESS, loading, false, 0, true);

  loader.addEventListener (Event.COMPLETE, complete, false, 0, true);

  loader.addEventListener (HTTPStatusEvent.HTTP_STATUS, httpStatusHandler, false, 0, true);

  loader.addEventListener (SecurityErrorEvent.SECURITY_ERROR, securityErrorHandler, false, 0, true);

  loader.addEventListener (IOErrorEvent.IO_ERROR, error, false, 0, true);

  Loader.Load (request);

  }

  private void Completed(e:Event):void {}

  trace (e.Target.Data);

  try {}

  var responseVars:Object = JSON.parse (e.target.data);

  } catch (err: error) {}

  trace (err.name + "" + err.message);

  }

  }

  private void Loading(e:ProgressEvent):void {}

  If {(e.bytesTotal)

  trace ((Math.round ((100 / e.bytesTotal) * e.bytesLoaded)) m:System.NET.SocketAddress.ToString () + '%');

  } else {}

  trace ("file has no size");

  }

  return;

  }

  private void httpStatusHandler (e:HTTPStatusEvent): void {}

  trace ("httpStatusHandler:" + e.type);

  return;

  }

  private void securityErrorHandler (e:SecurityErrorEvent): void {}

  trace ("securityErrorHandler:" + e.text);

  return;

  }

  private void error(e:IOErrorEvent):void {}

  trace ("error:" + e.text + "Type:" + e.type);

  return;

  }

  }

  }

  The code works correctly by running anywhere, but android, showing the contents of the file returned by the URL query. The managed code correctly with the old SSL certificate, but not the new SSL certificate. now, it will fail with the error.

  error: Error #2032: error in workflow. URL: https://www.jollysnaps.com/ Type: ioError

  It's a bit missleading error like what actually happens is android refuses to make the URL request, because it does not trust the SSL certificate and therefore will not send the data over an unreliable link.

  If the URL is replaced by a Web server with a real such as SSL certificate.

  https://www.GoDaddy.com/

  Then, the code works correctly.

  To be clear that I am looking to establish what is inconsistent between the SSL for the site certificate https://www.jollysnaps.com/ and the URLLoader running on an Android device, so I can report to my Web host because they don't seem to take seriously my problem.

  Thanks in advance

  Well it turns out that after watching this post

  olation-error-in-Adobe-Flash-MOVI http://StackOverflow.com/questions/6142137/Bad-Certificate-Name-causes-Security-sandbox-VI

  I discovered the solution.

  The certificate was changed from

  www.jollysnaps.com

  TO

  jollysnaps.com

  While https://www.jollysnaps.com/ applications work well in iOS, BlackBerry and OSX on Android, they fail, however, wish to https://jollysnaps.com/ work.

• The e-mail application does not connect to the Dreamhost servers. Perhaps because of how they configure their SSL certificate for their subdomains.

  http://wiki.DreamHost.com/Certificate_Domain_Mismatch_Error

  Certificate SSL of Dreamhost for their mail servers only at one level of subdomain while many of their clusters of e-mail exist on a second level subdomain. In my view, this translates into an error message 'bad security' of the e-mail application.

  I contacted DreamHost and they say they are unable to solve this problem, or that they will allow me to install an SSL certificate on my virtual domain pointing to my cluster e-mail (even if I had to buy a).

  I understand, it is possible to manually add certificates via adb in a way similar to this: http://www.pending.io/add-cacert-root-certificate-to-firefox-os/

  However what I read this: 1. does not work on the ZTE Open 2. Can only fix only navigation not the web mail client.

  Is there any option that is available to me short of switching hosts?

  Fabian,

  Are you familiar with Firefox OS? The reason why I say this is because the e-mail client cannot create an excaption certificate. In fact, it's design. It's design: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Gaia/Email/Features#Security

  This request for support to Mozilla was placed specifically for the product Firefox OS, for which there is only a single mail client.

  That said many people in the Mozilla Bugzilla, have been able to show me how to find another alias for those servers that actually works and in fact corresponds to SSL certificates. Although Dreamhost support could not provide me with any such information, and such information is not actually in the DreamHost wiki.

  I have a repeated insistence of Dreamhost possibility I should just live with the exceptions of SSL certificate, when there is real existing valid server names to match the certificates in question, silly.

  The fact that you post this solution for one product, so that it is not yet applicable beyond useless. It serves to muddy waters.