% SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: RX

Hi all

I have this problem on 2 4503E switch

CORE01

% SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: 1/Te1: low power warning Rx; Running value:-13,8 dBm, threshold value:-9,9 dBm.

% SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: 1/Te1: low current alarm Rx; Running value:-13.9 dBm, threshold value: d - 13, 90 dBm.

4503E_CORE01 #sh transceiver interfaces

Optical optics

Temperature Tx Rx power supply voltage

Port (Celsius) (Volts) (dBm) (dBm)

---------  -----------  -------  --------  --------

TE1/1 23.9 3.26-2.2-14.0

4503E_CORE01 #show inte te1/1 trans det

Alarm high high low warn warn low alarm

Temperature threshold threshold threshold threshold

Port (Celsius) (c) (c) (c) (c)

--------- ------------------  ----------  ---------  ---------  ---------

TE1/1 24.1 75.0 70.0 0.0-5,0

Alarm high high low warn warn low alarm

Threshold voltage threshold threshold threshold

Port (v) (v) (v) (v) (v)

---------  ---------------    ----------  ---------  ---------  ---------

TE1/1 3.26 3.60 3.50 3.10 3.00

Optical alarm warn high low warn low alarm

Transmitting power threshold threshold threshold threshold

Port (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm)

---------  -----------------  ----------  ---------  ---------  ---------

TE1/1-2, 2-1, 6 1,3-7,3-11.3

Optical alarm warn high low warn low alarm

Receive the power threshold threshold threshold threshold

Port (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm)

-------    -----------------  ----------  ---------  ---------  ---------

TE1/1-13, 9-1, 9 1.0-9.9-13.9

CORE02

% SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: 1/Te1: low power warning Rx; Running value:-13,5 dBm, threshold value:-9,9 dBm.

% SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: 1/Te1: low power warning Rx; Running value:-13,5 dBm, threshold value:-9,9 dBm.

4503E_CORE02 #sh transceiver interfaces

Optical optics

Temperature Tx Rx power supply voltage

Port (Celsius) (Volts) (dBm) (dBm)

---------  -----------  -------  --------  --------

TE1/1 27.5 3.24-2.3-13.5

4503E_CORE02 #show inte te1/1 trans det

Alarm high high low warn warn low alarm

Temperature threshold threshold threshold threshold

Port (Celsius) (c) (c) (c) (c)

--------- ------------------  ----------  ---------  ---------  ---------

TE1/1 75.0 27.4 70.0 0.0-5,0

Alarm high high low warn warn low alarm

Threshold voltage threshold threshold threshold

Port (v) (v) (v) (v) (v)

---------  ---------------    ----------  ---------  ---------  ---------

TE1/1 3.24 3.60 3.50 3.10 3.00

Optical alarm warn high low warn low alarm

Transmitting power threshold threshold threshold threshold

Port (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm)

---------  -----------------  ----------  ---------  ---------  ---------

TE1/1-2, 1-1, 6 1,3-7,3-11.3

Optical alarm warn high low warn low alarm

Receive the power threshold threshold threshold threshold

Port (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm)

-------    -----------------  ----------  ---------  ---------  ---------

TE1/1-13, 5-1, 9 1.0-9.9-13.9

I have only 1 transmitter/receiver on the two switch, I changed the cord fiber also the same question.

Hello

Yes, for positions that are in place and functioning, there is no work around that I know and who have not been able to get a good response from Cisco, but they insist it is a cosmetic error message.

can sometimes replace the SFP, but the error comes back again.

You can open a ticket with TAC.  They have a work around in the newer versions.

HTH

Tags: Cisco Network

Similar Questions

  • SPF % SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: WE stack 2960 X swtich

    Hi all.

    We install a 4x2960X new switches. of master swtich to the basic link. shows the battery captain

    % SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: item in gi1/0/50: low power warning Rx; Running value:-20,3 dBm, threshold value:-17,0 dBm.

    FPS is a cisco SFP and the version of the stack is c2960x-universalk9 - mz.150 - 2A .ex5 .bin.

    could some please explain what is this way to journal.

    Hello

    That is right.  The message does not damage anything.

    HTH

  • Receive optical power warning - above threshold

    As we know,

    We cannot set up the optical transmit power of the SFP. However, we can check the power level of reception received by the peer through the command:

    View details transceiver interface

    However, newspapers have been showing:

    20 August 06:45:14.434: % SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: item in gi1/0/25: high power warning Rx; Running value:-1.7 dBm, threshold value:-3,0 dBm.

    Check:

    Optical alarm warn high low warn low alarm
    Receive the power threshold threshold threshold threshold
    Port (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm)
    -------    -----------------  ----------  ---------  ---------  ---------
    Gi1/0/25-1 article, 7 + 1.0 - 3, 0 - 19.0 - 23.0

    This will have a big impact on my switch? In particular the SFP

    Factors such as damage, etc.

    In addition, how will this affect the performance network, health and functioning of my devices

    Your ideas are much appreciated (and if you can back it up with docs, it would be useful also! ^_^)

    It seems that your remote line is the sending of a relatively high output power and/or you have a connection very short fiber with very little loss. Since you are only at the beach 'warning', you are not likely to damage any of the SFP receiver or adversely affect the operation of the network.  You don't have the possibility to add an Optical Attenuator on the link to make the action more within the specification range.

  • Should DWDM SFP - log messages - I worry

    Jul 21 18:52:36 UTC: % SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: item in gi1/1/4: high power warning Rx; Running value:-5,5 dBm, threshold value:-9,0 dBm.

    21 July 19:02:36 UTC: % SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: item in gi1/1/4: high power warning Rx; Running value:-5,5 dBm, threshold value:-9,0 dBm.

    21 Jul 19:12:37 UTC: % SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: item in gi1/1/4: high power warning Rx; Running value:-5,5 dBm, threshold value:-9,0 dBm.

    NB: platform:

    WS-C3750X - 48P 12.2 (55) SE1

    -5.5 dB receive the power is outside the target of operation receive range,-9 at-28dBm, GE DWDM SFP.  Although it will not damage the FPS, you may experience an increase in bit errors.  You can install a 10dB Attenuator (or attenuated patchcord) at the end of receiver to bring the optics to be supplied in the operating parameters of the DWDM SFP.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Wireless causes to the satellite Pro 6100

    Hi I have a pro 6100 and just recently, I replaced the card WiFi mini PCI card [PA3171U-1MPC] 802. 11 b with PA3236U-1MPC a / b combo. The site Web of Toshiba shows this combo Mini PCI card as being compatible with my model so compability shouldn't b

  • What the original linksys website.

    Suddenly, I can show only products with the new shape of the body (with service, valet or e-series). I can't find the links to all the different adapters, routers, switches, print servers, etc. that were there a week ago. The only option seems to vie

  • HP6500 printer will not - analyze blocked popup

    I am Windows 7 64 bit, Internet Explorer 9 and have an HP6500 all in one printer. It allows to analyze very well through the web interface. Then I reinstalled my operating system because it was slowing down - including the relocation of the printer a

  • Error message from WCS (static WEP)

    Hi all We're migrating all the IOS AP to LWAP using WLC and WCS, we have several WLAN with a different set of security on IOS AP policy. I am facing a problem in the creation of WLAN on WCS server, I create a static model with WEP key with 128-bit en

  • Reg: Data Type NUMBER

    HelloI accidentally created table with column NUMBER (2.5) (in fact, it should be NUMBER (5.2)).So I thought to scale must be less than the value of precision . Therefore, Oracle must raise an error in this case, but it didn't.When I tested with cert