Site created with other software import

Similar Questions

• Hello, I can since muse importer an entire site created with other software?

  Hello, how to pour importer directly in muse an entire site created with other software? Thank you

  Hi Philsudouest,

  You not be able to import an existing site that has been created outside the Muse.

  Muse can only read files created in Muse (.muse files)

  Concerning

  Sonam

• I am new to Dreamweaver and to modify the prior site created with XSite Pro.  How to upload my Web site?

  How to import my site created with a different web designer?

  I don't think you'll like what you see in DW.  Best advice, rebuild the site.

  Basically, there is nothing much to import. Simply open DW, click Site > new Site and say DW where you keep the files of your site on your local hard drive.

  That said, no XSite Pro features exclusive web, you used will probably not work in DW.  You may need to find replacements for them.

  Good luck!

  Nancy O.

• Select the search for a site created with the Director

  How can I index a site created with the Director for google? (dcr file).

  Thank you.

  Google can not definitely analyze your site 'pages' because there is not.

  The best you can do is use the submission process of Google site to submit your site. However, again, when the Google spider will crawl it there will be nothing. That's why I would never create a whole site to the Director... Well, that's one of the reasons and a good enough if all you need is a. I would use the Director I want Flash to add interactive content / animation on a Web site as a '' recommended '' the site section - and although this can now be done using HTML5 and other scripts or cross browser frameworks/technologies such as JQuery which, IMHO, are much better solutions.

• After hosting my site created with adobe muse on a ftp server, can I change my site on muse adobe later and update it on this same server ftp with the same domain name and do not have to pay for hosting again?

  After hosting my site created with adobe muse on a ftp server, can I change my site on muse adobe later and update it on this same server ftp with the same domain name and do not have to pay for hosting again?

  Yes, no extra accommodation payment is required. After editing your site and savings, click download file to the host of VTT... The info should auto fill with the same information that you used to download the site the first time. You can choose to download only files "changed" or "all files". Click OK and the old files will be overwritten.

• Insert comments on a web site created with "Muse".

  I wonder if with "Muse", it is an a tool to leave any reviews or comments to customers of my company on my Web site, kind of little United Nations "tripadvisor" or "booking.com".

  May on find a program to insert on my web site, created with "Muse".

  Thank you pour your answers

  Hello

  You can use the form to get feedback from customers on the page, or if you are hosting the CB site you can use the comments module.

  Apart from this, you can integrate custom solutions.

  Thank you

  Sanjit

• Can I synchronize my offline version of a site created with Muse with the web version?

  I had a site that I created with Muse and now I can't find the original file to Muse more recently changed to this site. Can I synchronize an older version of office with the new version that is currently online and downloaded?

  Thank you

  Dave

  Hello

  Actually, NO! By following the steps mentioned in: help Adobe Muse | Change in the browser of the Web sites using third-party providers of hosting services of you can also in browser edit sites hosted with third parties (other than Business catalyst) accommodation.

• AA in comparison with other software

  I was wondering, since there are so many other software on the market and AA is just one of them, how AA compares with the other software out there? I am a user of AA and don't use any other software and I heard very good reviews on other software like Cubase, Logic, Protools, etc...

  In fact, what are the benefits of using Adobe Audition instead of other DAW software?

  joshuazidane wrote:

  In fact, I don't really no this statement, cause "hearing isn't really a very good place to create music as such, but it's a great place to assemble once it is audio files", I am quite new to present and create music and editing music sounds the same to me. Could you elaborate a little on what they mean individually? Thank you

  Creating music with music software usually is to be able to do things like setting the different tempos and to make arrangements of grid which can be manipulated, and almost all cases they have highly integrated with this arrangement noon - and that's what the hearing has (and not if she...). On the other hand, software music isn't a separate edition on which a page variety of separate operations conducted destructively (when you save them, the changes are permanent) can be done - at least not easily. So if you want to create what I call "mechanical" music - which is what are your more commercial orders is today, so something like Cubase or Logic would do well - it has all the extras, like keyboards integrated piano, drum of grids, sequencers interactive expression, rating integrated and heaven knows what else. And hearing just doesn't have those. However, if you want to save what I would call 'acoustic' music, then hearing is very good - the original concept was based on how works an old analog multitrack machine, only with a slightly new tilt insofar as it was non-destructive - everything that happens in the multitrack view is that your files are played in a selective way - they are not 'edition '. so not at all.

  What I received your response, is that the hearing is simply the best to control music and editing of music with its built-in effects (e.g., reverb, phaser,...). But when it comes to MIDI sounds or Synth via a midi controller and multitrack different instruments, it is nothing compared with the other big names. Is this fair? But other big-name software do not come with a wide range of control and editing tools, too? So what's good hearing what other software can not match up?

  I didn't know that the hearing was a late entrant. Laughing out loud. I thought that cool edit pro started around the same time as cubase, etc... lol

  He wouldn't put it quite like that - you can do perfectly good multitracking of acoustic instruments with her, after all. Other "big names" software generally have nothing like the ability for hearing editing - that's why broadcasters from all over the world use it. Where hearing scores highly here is that it is fairly intuitive and incredibly fast as an editor, and there are always several ways to do things. Thus, for example, if you have a load of bits of the interview, background effects, music, and you need to create a package in a hurry, you can change the interviews in the editing mode down to usable of the word blocks, batch these in individual files and then assemble your production set in multitrack view slippery things around however you like and then mix it easily down to a single file broadcastable. And the music software just won't let you do something like that at all - or if this is the case, it would be very awkward and you will probably lose the will to live while you do.

  I am sure that Cubase began well before even Cool Edit 96, which came well before the CEP, and that it was originally called twenty-four Pro and ran on the Atari. But the big difference is that Cubase actually started as a MIDI sequencer and made no audio at all. NOON came not at hearing up to 2.0, and it was pretty basic (still is). There are many of us who believe firmly that noon should not be on the hearing - this is not strictly a function of installation/Assembly. The only good news on this subject is that it is completely hidden if you do not want to use - and apparently it's officially my fault, and I'm very happy to take all the blame for this.

  With respect to the control, either incidentally, it's a little more to it. Hearing is inherently more accurate than, for example, ProTools, which has an audio performance of piss-poor, and even if they don't admit to him very often, almost all supposed PT users keep a copy of Audition autour - simply because for mastering, it is way better. ProTools uses an interface 24 bits wide with a limited dynamic range that gets reduced even more if you size things on it, but engine hearing using 32-bit floating-point algorithms, eliminating scaling losses, which are generally superior. And when it comes to sample rate conversions, hearing was independently assessed as being the best - there are quite certainly for money. And by the way, this 32-bit engine also makes audio mixdowns generally better - it is inherently more accurate at all. Among other things, I use hearing for classical music of wide dynamic range editing, and I don't get any complaints about the sound at all. I would certainly have something as PT confidence could do this, even if - last time I used it, I really was not at all satisfied with the sound quality, I had and I know that I am not alone in this view. It is also why many passive mixers after-market are sold to PT users - they get more own mixes their use they make of the software.

  If really it's horses for courses - hearing isn't exactly a pony a thing, but I would say it is not software really versatile music at all. OTOH, music software generally isn't facilities decent edit - which explains why in something like Sonar you will have the opportunity to use Audition as an external editor - which many people do. They complement each other would probably be the best way to look at it, I'd say.

• Camileo X 100-how to use with other software?

  Hello

  I have a camera video camileo x 100. Can someone tell me how to use this unit on other software rather than the CRA? Won't codec, I use vegas video 8 and I try to convert you arc soft video converter, the only problem is

  1. I don't see video without audio
  2. regardless of the profile, I chose the converter does not give me the original size I shot the video
  3. the video is really badly coded and his jumps every time I press on play or make.

  Can you recommend some sort of software where I can convert these files and always keep it without loss?

  I think that it is a terrible problem! Why do you make a camera where you can not even change freely with a versatile codec? The arc soft video demo edition is low and in my opinion it is not supposed to buy a camera with these limited edition modes

  I would be really appreciated if someone could give a suggestion for a converter that can be used!

  Thank you!

  Hey,.

  Identical or similar question already here:
  http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=56484&TSTART=0

  I m X 100 not owner, but I Camileo H30 is I think its predecessor and it generates AVI video files and I can use those files with each program. Image and sound are working correctly, even the camera software is not installed.

  I don t know what Vegas Video 8 program, but normally each program can handle avi files. Also check the page of manufacturing of this video program for an update.

  I hope that helps! :)

  Welcome them

• Why can I no longer updated my Site created with the Muse?

  I had Adobe Creative cloud for a few years. I also have a Web site (http://www.amazineasheville.net) created with Muse and hosted by Adobe.

  Meanwhile, I could easily make updates and publish them on my site.

  Suddenly, three or four weeks, I no longer can get my updates of the website published on my site. Instead, I get the display options on a site that uses a businesscatalyst extension. I can't post to my actual website address.

  No matter what selections in the menu of Muse that I choose, I can't have my updates published on amazingasheville.net. Since June 19, I couldn't update my real site, just the version Business Catalyst of it, which is not visible to the public.

  What has changed? That's happened? What is going on?

  I don't have a site program that does not allow me to make changes easily!

  Thanks for any help.

  It had to do with the folder on the server. The Options menu after I clicked on publish showed a certain folder, and told me that I should just leave this entry blank. That seems to make the difference.

  Nancy, I think you were on the right track on the problem.

  There is also a new update (I remember correctly, it's dated July 20) dreaming that I saw for the first time today and applied, and which also seems to be involved in the solution. The person who called me Adobe said there have been some problems with the Muse that resolved the last update.

  I'm a writer, mostly books on the retirement and travel, not a Web site developer or graphic designer, 80 or 90% of Adobe Creative Cloud is so over my head and little value convenient for me, but to get a few components of CC I need, I have to buy a subscription to the whole.

• How can I download a Web site created with Muse using FileZilla?

  Hello

  I created a website using Muse.  Whenever I try to download the website through Muse, the download breaks down.  The active folder contains many large pdf files, so I think it's part of the problem.  I was able to download the pdf of wholesale for Muse site using FileZilla.  So my question is: How can I download necessary files created with Muse (html, scripts, etc...)  using FileZilla?  Any help would be appreciated.

  Thanks :)

  Derek

  Hello

  Please use the export HTML option in Muse and then try to download hosting server using filezilla.

  You can find this option in file > export as HTML.

  Concerning

  Vivek

• Why does viewport meta tag not work on sites created with Muse?

  If you have a site that works well on all platforms, you just want to show the width good feature on mobile devices once you have built a desktop version. No need to reinvent the wheel and build more than two sites with Muse.

  
  

  Correct display in the width of the device is usually easy to do with the metatag "viewport". This tag doesn't seem to work at all on the sites created by Muse. What gives? Is there an alternative code that can be applied to sites built by Muse?

  Please provide the url of the site and the tag that you used for your site.

  You can use the window control for the site that should work unless there is problem with the code used or how it is implemented in the questions.

  This document shows the details:

  http://www.Muse-themes.com/blogs/News/6296420-experiments-in-mobile-site-design-with-Adobe - muse

  Thank you

  Sanjit

• With the help of tags created in bridge with other software

  If I invest 36 hours my picture of marking using Bridge CS4, will be these tags into metadata at all times?

  I wonder if another user or myself will be able to use tags using other popular as software:

  Photoshop Elements

  Picasa

  Windows Live Photo Gallery

  Suite from Microsoft digital image

  SnagIt

  Nikon Capture

  Paint Shop

  Director of photography

  Aperture 3

  Photomatix

  PhotoImpact

  Thanks in advance for your input and your expertise.

  SnagIt 11.1 does not support playback of the metadata.

  Windows Live Photo Gallery is supported metadata {tags including} (sides are has any application graphics microsoft windows 7 will work - my opinion)

• How to host sites created with Muse with other hosting providers?

  If my customer prefers to use a third party hosting provider (non - Business Catalyst), is it still possible for me to build their site using Muse?

  Should my sites be hosted on servers Adobe Business Catalyst?

  I prefer to use the built-in accommodation provided with Muse, but my client has used a different host for a long time providers (and all their sites are on the same service). It simplifies their billing process, so they have specifically asked that I have set up their site to host with another provider. Is this possible?

  You can use Muse to build a Web site and then publish the site on another Web host of your choice.

  Follow these steps:

  Choose file > export as HTML to export all of the files from the site to your local computer.

  

  Once you have exported a copy of all the files of the site, you have two options:

  1. Use the FTP Dreamweaver feature to connect to the host using the information from your customer account and then download (Site > put) the entire folder of files to your hosting account.
  2. Use a third party FTP client to connect to the host server and download the files.

  For more information, see the article using one-third the FTP client to transfer assets to a site hosted Muse.

  The FTP article is also applicable to this topic in the forum: my site does not work when I download on my Web host, but it's good in the preview. How can I solve this?

• Web site created with Adobe Muse is extremely slow

  Hello

  My website www.christiansanderstenor.com is extremely slow. I created the website with Adobe Muse, and everything seemed to be fine when I preview it in my browser. It is a Web site with a few things from Parallax and scroll one page JS libraries. I thought that Muse would optimizes all photos so that they would be the correct size, but it is running as if it was just too big or something. Any ideas?

  Thank you

  Christian

  Hi Christian,

  first thing I noticed is the large image, for example

  sanders_20140326_8234.jpg is 1.6 MB in size, so it will take a while to load.

  I suggest to optimize your images and then check it out, you should see the improvement in load times. You can refer to this article to get an idea on the optimization of assets

  Understand the size and resolution of your graphics card. Adobe Muse CC tutorials

  Work with images. Adobe Muse CC tutorials

  Let me know if you have any question.