Size of the table only includes not Keynote - can not enter directly px

Similar Questions

• Change the size of the text only does not work

  Font size standard on most of the Windows I have open in Windows 8 is a 5 or 6. I'm in front of my computer, 6 to 8 hours per day (teacher online), and it's the single most annoying problem that I have ever met.  "Change the size of the text only ' on my display settings page is grey - there is no solution.  Can I change the size of everything, that gives me giant icons, but the text on all the windows is still tiny.

  I hope someone has a useful suggestion. Please don't tell me to go to "Change the size of text only." This is the function that does not work.
  My Windows 8 was purchased in January - part of the Microsoft $! 5 offer to people who bought computers between October and December of last year. The installation went fairly well, but I had this problem of fonts since then.  ASUS computer laptop, Intel core I7, good resolution, good speed, ideal machine, except that Windows has me squint all that day, seven days a week.
  Thank you and best regards, all
  Reggie Audibert

  Font size standard on most of the Windows I have open in Windows 8 is a 5 or 6. I'm in front of my computer, 6 to 8 hours per day (teacher online), and it's the single most annoying problem that I have ever met.  "Change the size of the text only ' on my display settings page is grey - there is no solution.  Can I change the size of everything, that gives me giant icons, but the text on all the windows is still tiny.

  I hope someone has a useful suggestion. Please don't tell me to go to "Change the size of text only." This is the function that does not work.

  My Windows 8 was purchased in January - part of the Microsoft $! 5 offer to people who bought computers between October and December of last year. The installation went fairly well, but I had this problem of fonts since then.  ASUS computer laptop, Intel core I7, good resolution, good speed, ideal machine, except that Windows has me squint all that day, seven days a week.

  Thank you and best regards, all

  Reggie Audibert

  Hi Reggie

  The option "Change only the size of the text" applies only to the text for the following items.

  Title bars

  Menus

  Message boxes

  Titles of palette

  Text of the icon

  ToolTips

  What you need to do is select the link "Custom resizing options" directly above the option "Change only the text size.

  In the dialog box move the cursor in the rule box, hold down the left button of the mouse and drag the rule. If the size is 100%, try to start with it to 125%.

  Click OK, and then apply. You will be asked to disconnect / connect to before the change takes effect.

  If 125% does not for you try to bump the size up one another 10% gradually until you are satisfied.

  Let us know if it works for you.

  Concerning

• Given CLOB not allowing the size of the table cut!

  Hi Experts,

  Environment: 11.2.0.3. on Solaris 10.

  We have a table that contains the CLOB data and this table takes about 111 GB!

  SQL > desc INFO_MESSAGES

  Name                                      Null?    Type

  ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------

  CLNT_OID NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (16)

  USR_OID NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (16)

  LAST_client_msg_ID VARCHAR2 (36)

  LAST_client_msg_DATE DATE

  LAST_client_msg CLOB

  LAST_USR_MSG_BOD_ID VARCHAR2 (36)

  DATE OF LAST_USR_MSG_DATE

  CLOB LAST_USR_MSG

  Select * of dba_segments order by bytes DESC;

  MIGRTN SYS_LOB0000111131C00008$ $ LOBSEGMENT SAMS DATA1 20690 6 1963 14528000 119013376000 <-the top row

  This segment is to table INFO_MESSAGES. I confirmed by joining in ALL_LOBs.

  This segment: SYS_LOB0000111131C00008$ $ belong to this column: LAST_USR_MSG

  The column LAST_USR_MSG were originally from huge text data, each line having approximately 4 MB in size. To reclaim the space, we have put this column of small as "data truncated" data using an update statement for the half of the rows in the table.

  as:

  Update INFO_MESSAGES set LAST_USR_MSG = "data truncated" where rownum < 25001 (this where clause was based on other criteria on a real mission but he updated 25000 lines - half of the table).

  Now after having done that, the size of the table has not changed!

  The table is still 120 GB. So what should he do to recover the space here? Should we export, truncate, and import the table - or can it be reconstructed (without causing locks and allowing application to access it or there at - it other better options?)

  Thank you

  OrauserN

  You must use dbms_redefintion, at the same time, change BASICFILE (have you been to) to SECUREFILE

  The latter LOBs will reorganize automatically.

  Demo at http://www.morganslibrary.org

  -----------

  Sybrand Bakker

  Senior Oracle DBA

• Size of the table is too big Performance problem.

  Hello
  
  Suppose that we table that has about 160 columns inside. About 120 of these columns are Varchar data type with about size 100-3000 each column.
  
  This table has also about 2 million lines in there. I don't know if they are considered large tables of sizes?
  
  Like these tables a good representation of the data. I'm in doubt because the size of the table is very large and may take a long time for queries. We have about 10 indexes on this table.
  
  What kind of precautions should be taken when this kind of tables are involved in the database and they needed for the application.
  
  Version of database is Oracle 10.2.0.4
  
  I know that the question is a little vague, but I wonder what needs to be done and where I start digging the question just in case I have performance issues while trying to select the data or update the data.
  
  I also want to know if there are any size idle for tables and anything that is more that what needs to be treated differently.
  
  Thanking you
  Rocky

  Any table with more than 50 columns should be regarded with suspicion. This does not mean that it is appropriate for uses no tables with columns 120 or 220, but that doesn't mean that they are quite rare.

  Which doesn't bother me on your first paragraph is the number of columns of text with sizes of up to 3 K. It is very revealing of poor design. One thing is for sure... no one is a report and printing on what anyone smaller than a plotter.

  2 rows at point M is small by almost any definition so I wouldn't worry on this subject. Partitioning is an option, but only if the size of partition can translate to work with your queries and we have not seen any of them nor would we have no idea what you can use as a partition key or the type of partitioning so any intelligent discussion of this option would require a lot more information from you.

  There is no precaution that relate to what you wrote. You have told us nothing on the safety, use, volumes of transactions or any other important thing in such a review.

  What needs to be done in the future, is for someone who understands the normalization to look at this table, review the rules management, reviewing the purpose to which it will be put, and especially reports and the results that will come against her and no longer justify and change the structure. Then with an evaluation of the completed table... you must run SQL and examine the plans generated using DBMS_XPLAN and timing compared to your Service Level Agreement (SLA) with clients from the system.

• How to find the size of the table?

  Hi all

  Can anyone suggest how to find the size of the table? I had a few (15272 selected lines) on the name of "CMPT_" How can I check only 'CMPT_' size tables?

  
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  Please someone help give the SQL query to run.

  
  

  Thanks in advance.

  
  

  Vincent
  

  madala03 wrote:

  Hi thanks for the reply

  I'm out like below

  SUM(BYTES/1024/1024)

  --------------------

  25383.25

  But how to check all the name of tables CMPT and their sizes?

  Select nom_segment, dba_Segments sum(bytes/1024/1024) where nom_segment like ' % CMPT GROUP BY nom_segment;

• Explore: Discover: Choose Details: Audio sample rate and the size of the Audio sample are not available in the list choose the details.

  With audio files (in particular the WAV), Audio sampling frequency and the size of the Audio sample are not the choices available in the list of details with Vista.  In earlier versions of Windows (2000 and XP) they were both selectable as details.  Is it possible to get these will appear under Vista?

  Vista - related audio details available:
  Album
  Album artist
  Bit depth
  Bitrate
  Duration
  Kind
  Year

  2000 / XP - audio related details are available:
  The album title
  Artist
  Audio sampling rate
  Audio sample size
  Bitrate
  Kind
  Title
  The track number
  Year

  FWIW, sampling frequencies are discussed in the Help window and how to (below).

  Reference: http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/Windows/en-US/Help/53adb4c7-d538-42f8-bb13-917379922afe1033.mspx

  Thank you!

  For the third part of the applications that perform many tasks, I usually discover www.tucows.com and www.download.com.  They have a wide variety of programs, and the trick is to put in the correct search terms to find what you are looking for.  Make sure you that your selection is compatible with Windows Vista and at tucows, try to pick one with 4 or 5 cows because they are the highest rated.

  Good luck! Lorien - a - MCSE/MCSA/network + / A +.

• How to reduce the size of the text only 500 CV Ko asked

  original title: word format

  How to reduce the size of the text only 500 CV Ko asked

  This is a forum for Windows Vista - so I assume you are using WordPad or Notepad?  What is an email that you put together without attachments?

  Type less.  More abbreviate.  Choose the unnecessary parts.

  If you have a single given pure text document you posted and assumptions that must be made because of that-, then these are your choices.

  If you have a version of some processing (such as Microsoft Office Word 2000, XP, 2003, 2007, or 2010) and this is what you are asking about - everything will depend on the version of Word that you have, etc.-, but the General advice above remains true with the addition of "stay away from fancy formatting.

• I'm doing a pdf to a file and I need to get the size of the file to be not more than 10 MB. What is the best way to do

  I'm doing a pdf to a file and I need to get the size of the file to be not more than 10 MB. Even when I save it, the image quality at least the file size is 10.9 MB. What is the best way to do

  Open the PDF in Acrobat Pro. Choose file > save as other > PDF of reduced size or PDF optimized (which gives you more options).

• size of the table

  How to check the size of the table?

  Select segment_name,Bytes/1024/1024 from DBA_SEGMENTS;
  
  or
  
  SELECT SUM(bytes)/1024/1024 MB
  FROM dba_segments
  WHERE segment_type ='TABLE'
  AND segment_name=
  

• difference in size of the Table in oracle and timesten

  Hi all
  
  
  I have a large table with 2 million records,
  
  I see no big difference in the size of the table in oracle and Timesten
  In oracle table size to 4 GB, but in Timesten is arround 15 GB (using ttSize for 2 M lines)
  
  Could you please tell me what could be the cause of this difference?
  Is the size of the table in Timesten is always more than oracle?
  What are the factors and parameters affecting the size of Perm?

  It is typical for the storage needs for a DataSet to be significantly larger in TimesTen in Oracle. This is due to the Organization of the very different internal storage in TT from Oracle; Oracle is optimized to save space while TT is optimized for performance.

  Ways to minimize these costs are:

  1. make sure you use TimesTen 11.2.1. This has some characteristics compare compact (minor) and earlier versions.

  2 assess the use of numeric types; native types TimesTen (TT_TINYINT, TT_SMALLINT, TT_INTEGER and TT_BIGINT) use less space than MANY and longer by the effective calculation as well.

  3. check use of data of variable length (VARCHAR2, VARBINARY, NVARCHAR) and the trade-offs between online and online storage (see documentation for the compromise between these options stirage TT).

  Even when you use the foregoing, you will still see a storage important "inflation" for TT from Oracle.

  Chris

• size of the table on disk

  Hello

  Wanted to know the size of a table on the disk.  Assume I have a Table with 10 columns...  Only, Varchar2, number and Date fields.  For example, of same data in the CSV file with all fields in complete occupation like the VARCHAR2 data size field and have 100 000 files occupy 100 MB on the disk.  In this case just wanted to know, table also occupies space on the disk?  If not, what is the approximate percentage of diviation?

  If there is an index defined on 3 columns of the table and the types of fields for these 3 columns would be, field Date and a numeric field, third field as field Varchar2 (100) respectively.  In this case, about how much additional disk space will be ustilized in percentage?

  Please note that I am not interested on any other sizing as DB dimensions, other dimensions of the diagram, software size, etc., etc., I wanted to just know, if I have a 1 GB of data in the CSV file and I load in the Table, will take an equal amount of size on the disk or there is a major difference.  Of course, I know that because of the definition of the width to the table field, there is a major change in the use of disk space.  However, for highest estimate, just consider that Varchar2 column size and the actual data in CSV is even.

  Thank you

  -Anand

  The best way to find out – load a representative sample of data and check the size of the segments / the index of the table.

  The size will be different, for sure. DATEs are 7 bytes. VARCHAR2 takes at least one byte over the data size. NUMBER would take usually less space it is used by the CSV format.

  In addition, the Oracle tables are stored in a heap structure and generally have unused space allocated to the table.

  John

• build the table only if a case structure

  
  

  Hi adamkse,

  Here are a couple of screws for you to watch. I think they both what you want, the second is a better way.

  Notes:

  Enjoy the indexing feature in order to remove the indexing of tables yourself. So you don't have to change for the iterations of the loop if the size of your input array changes.

  You have been reset table "ucodes' each time as the outer loop. Then, which has been corrected.

  The reason why the second vi is better, because a table in a loop construction is generally a bad idea. LabView must make memory allocation as the table grows (does if the picture remains very low). It may take time, so its best to avoid it. First do you the big picture as he possible can get, then replace the elements starting at zero. Keep track of the actual size with a shift register, and then resize the table at the end.

  I hope this helps.

  Steve

• Show the button with a single click to edit the table only after click

  Hi all

  I love the click to change features in tables in the ADF and have a button in one of the columns I want to only be displayed in the mode (it is only once the user has clicked on a particular line) edition. Currently, all fields appear as read-only and can be changed when the user clicks on a line, but it seems that the button is always visible. I tried a few EL expressions to set the visible property of the button but have not found one that works. Could you help to define an EL or give me a hint on how I could hide the buttons in the table and only then display the row that is clicked and can be changed?

  Thank you

  Jobinesh blogged about this here decompilation binary ADF: made conditional editor components for a table of clickToEdit

  Timo

• Size of the table in R12

  Hello:

  I need to know the size of the AP_INTERFACE_CONTROLS table in the 12.1.3 and 11.1.0.7 database. I just got this requirment. How to calculate? I Googled, but it did not apply to this.

  Thank you for your help.

  873768 wrote:

  Hello:

  I need to know the size of the AP_INTERFACE_CONTROLS table in the 12.1.3 and 11.1.0.7 database. I just got this requirment. How to calculate? I Googled, but it did not apply to this.

  Thank you for your help.

  Query DBA_SEGMENTS - https://forums.oracle.com/thread/1113909

  SQL> select segment_name, segment_type, bytes/1024/1024 MB
  from dba_segments
  where segment_type='TABLE' and segment_name='';
  

  Thank you

  Hussein

• Increase in size of database extremely - need to monitor the size of the table

  Hi all
  
  I need help in the growth of the follow-up tables. It's that the database grows enormously from 192 G at 200 over five days, representing 5% increase in database size. The general scenario is that is that the db is growing 20% annually, but this increase in a week will cause future hardware problems.
  
  Please advice to find the tables that is still growing.
  
  Thank you
  DBA Junr.

  Hi Georges s/n, do not know if this will help you now, but I did something like this on a daily basis for about 3 years. Literally, I have the size of each segment on a daily basis for this time and can go back in the graphic history of growth. If I had the question you ask the subject that I would be able to tell you exactly what segments are developed. If you need this on a smaller time frame, you can change the data stored in the column "created_date' to all the hours I guess.

  Anyway, here's the create statement.

  create table db_segment_history
  (
    db_segment_history_id     integer not null,
    owner                 varchar2(30),
    segment_name          varchar2(81),
    partition_name        varchar2(30),
    segment_type          varchar2(18),
    created_date          date default trunc(sysdate) not null,
    tablespace_name       varchar2(30),
    header_file           number,
    header_block          number,
    bytes                 number,
    blocks                number,
    block_size            number,
    extents               number,
    initial_extent        number,
    next_extent           number,
    min_extents           number,
    max_extents           number,
    pct_increase          number,
    freelists             number,
    freelist_groups       number,
    relative_fno          number,
    buffer_pool           varchar2(7)
  );
  
  create sequence db_segment_history_seq cache 1000;
  
  create unique index xpkdb_segment_history on db_segment_history( db_segment_history_id );
  
  alter table db_segment_history add ( constraint xpkdb_segment_history primary key ( db_segment_history_id )
  using index );
  
  create unique index ak1db_segment_history on db_segment_history(
       owner, segment_name, partition_name, segment_type, created_date );
  
  create trigger db_segment_history_bir
  before insert on db_segment_history
  for each row
  begin
       select     db_segment_history_seq.nextval
       into     :new.db_segment_history_id
       from     dual;
  end;
  /
  

  This is the insert / select that I use.

  insert into db_segment_history(
       owner, segment_name, created_date,
       partition_name, segment_type, tablespace_name,
       header_file, header_block, bytes,
       blocks, block_size, extents,
       initial_extent, next_extent, min_extents,
       max_extents, pct_increase, freelists,
       freelist_groups, relative_fno, buffer_pool )
  select  owner, segment_name, trunc( sysdate ),
       partition_name, segment_type, tablespace_name,
       header_file, header_block, bytes,
       blocks, bytes/blocks block_size, extents,
       initial_extent, next_extent, min_extents,
       max_extents, pct_increase, freelists,
       freelist_groups, relative_fno, buffer_pool
  from    dba_segments
  where   tablespace_name in(
            select tablespace_name from dba_tablespaces where contents = 'PERMANENT' );
  
  commit;
  

  I hope this helps.
  Michael Cunningham

  Published by: Michael C on February 21, 2012 14:19