Stale ASync Remote Call

Similar Questions

• VI first very slow remote call

  My sequences include several call to vi on a PXI chassis.  PXI is running Labview.  The first time that a stage with a remote vi runs, nothing seems to happen as long as 30 seconds.  Subsequent executions of the same step instantly produce unless the code of the module is unloaded.  My hunch is that Labview PXI is looking for all the Subvi remote VI.  Optimize the search may have helped PXI a little path.  But what really helps is to explicitly call the server PXI Labview vi within a module of code runs locally using vi references.  In this case, even the first call is seemingly instantaneous.  If anyone has experienced this?  Anyone understand it?

  Now, I have converted several remote calls VI to prototypes local but the VI path on the remote server specified in the Advanced pane.  I get significantly improve performance.

• test remote call of PeopleSoft

  Hi all

  on FSCM9, tools 8.50 on Win 2008

  in the PeopleTools Debug utility Test Utilities menu PeopleTools, there is a button:

  test of remote call

  When it is launched which node or the destination would be called?

  How to define and set it?

  Thank you.

  remotecall is unrelated to Integration Broker, so it uses no knots, etc.

  It is available to test online calls cobol from the application server.

  https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E38689_01/pt853pbr0/Eng/PT/tpcd/task_UsingtheRemoteCallFeature-074a63.html

• I can do 2 remote calls at the same time?

  Hello

  I can do 2 remote calls at the same time? For example, if I have the following remote objects:

  "" < mx:RemoteObject id = "myRemote" destination ="zend" source = "MyData" showBusyCursor ="true"fault = "faultListener (event)"> "

  " < mx:method name ="getData"result ="getDataListener (event)"/ >

  < / mx:RemoteObject >

  "" < mx:RemoteObject id = "myRemote2" destination ="zend" source = "MyData2" showBusyCursor ="true"fault = "faultListener (event)"> "

  " < mx:method name ="getData2"result ="getDataListener (event)"/ >

  < / mx:RemoteObject >

  And I call them at the same time:

  public function myFunc (): void {}

  myRemote.getData ();

  myRemote2.getData2 ();

  }

  Will it work? Flex will be "confused" the results of a call with the results of the call on the other? Do I need an AsyncToken? If so, how to use an AsyncToken in the example above?

  Thank you

  -Laxmidi

  I do it all the time. I call the one for control combobox with a list of people, a

  and with these data on people filling a datagrid. Then use the drop-down list to filter the datagrid.

  In your sample well mak result = "getDataListener (event) another" and name it getDataListener2, so there is a separate and a dataprovider for the first to the second. "

  If your going to the same event, the other will replace the first.

  Hope this helps

• Deactivation of the App during the remote call

  Hello
  Basically, I'm looking for a way to circumvent some problems (for me, major issues) introduced by remote calls are asynchronous.
  So, my first thought was that, before a remote call, I would...
  this.parentApplication.enabled = false
  Then, in the callback...
  this.parentApplication.enabled = true
  
  The problem is that I often have multiple applications at the same time and returns the results at different times, etc. I can try to hack things together for specific calls, but my preference would be a single solution to tote by which the application is disabled in all remote calls and becomes enabled again when no appeal is pending. This aspect should take into account that the application should be activated again if there are faults returned, etc..
  
  Some of my remote calls can take a few seconds. And with the user messing around clicking on things during this period can cause major explosions.
  
  Anyone concerned with that? Any tips?
  
  Thank you

  What types of remote calls are you doing... ?

  For something as HTTP Service calls you might just increment a variable static meter every time you make a call (iPendingCalls ++) and then in the event handler for the event result decrement, iPendingCalls again.
  Bind the visibility of a "loading screen" which covers the entire application, an assessment of the question whether iPendingCalls is greater than zero.
  (You obviously need to ensure that all http errors are treated as well in this case.)

  HTH / Culme

• "The remote call procedure failed" installation ATI graphics driver

  I had problems with the driver for my graphics card (ATI Radeon x 1950) and it was recommended that I have recharge it. When I started to reload the driver, I got an error message when the Setup program has been extracted which said ' Fhurt to run the installation. " Remote procedure call failed. "I am running Windows XP SP3. "

  
  

  Thank you

  Usually, it is recommended to uninstall first the Catalyst Control Center and drivers Ati before making another installation of the drivers / software from CCC.

• List of remote calls SX20 and green call button implemented recent

  Hello

  I'm currently looking for a show where I'm trying to simplify as much as possible for the users and with a distance Sx20 workflow when you press the green call button it immediately brings to mind a recent calls list. Is there anyway to not immediately set up this list?

  I was talking to users who are certain that there was a time when the SX20 has not brought to the top of the list by hitting the green button on the remote control. I was wondering if anyone here could remember?

  Thank you

  I remember he was always like that, I did a quick search of bug and even through the release notes and see no mention of a change in this behavior.  The SX20 appeared with TC5 software, looking at the User Guide of at the time, they talk the Green Telephone button is "place a call", so it makes sense that it would be a shortcut to open the list of recent calls.

• Remote call to a button

  Is it possible to call the remote of a change button click event in the input text?

  
  <! [CDATA]
  Import spark.events.TextOperationEvent;
  import mx.controls.Alert
  protected function button1_clickHandler(event:MouseEvent):void
  {
  Alert.Show ("Hello World")
  }

  protected function textarea1_changeHandler(event:TextOperationEvent):void
  {
  HOW TO CALL THE CLICK ON THE BUTTON ABOVE TO HERE?
  }

  []] >
  < / fx:Script >

  Thank you

  GT

  protected function textarea1_changeHandler(event:TextOperationEvent):void
  {
                 Button1.dispatchEvent (new MouseEvent (MouseEvent.CLICK));
  }

• The remote call ODI Agent

  Hello world
  
  I have this headache: I have both ODI and DB installed on the same server * (server 1) *. All the ETL process are reduced to individual packaging which is extracting some files and load these data to a server (Server 2) Essbase. The question is that I need to allow functional users (FU) to run these packages in their computers that can access both servers 1 and 2 by VPN.
  
  The first solution that I thought was to create a .bat to server 1 (authorities donations to FU to those files) and run remotely using PsExec. It didn't work because the connection to the user when it is different (server 1 and Fu computers) that would mean pass the password in plain text.
  
  At the moment I am trying to configure a remote agent on server 1 but I am failling to understand how the FU will be able to start an odi package. They need to have the ODI client on their computers? If so, how can I set up in their ODI client? Do I need to establish a connection to the repository Server1?
  
  
  Kind regards
  Soares

  You can use the web console ODI ODI 11g. The scenario must be generated and then navigation navigate > DURATION > scenarios > all scenarios select the scenario for the respective package, and then run it.

  If you do not have the web console with you then ODI must be installed. However, options can be used as remote desktop, webservices (I'd rather install ODI), Putty to connect to the UNIX server and run the commands from the ODI.

• How can I make a call remote LVRT vi

  I would call a vi on my host of windows since a cRIO vi.  I understand my options here:

  Can I make a remote call with the string name of path, or vi if it is in memory?  What is the format of the name?

  Does include both the name of the project?  So far, I have tried every permutation I can think but cannot get

  a good reference of vi.  Also, is it possible to open a remote reference to a reentrant vi that is currently in memory?

  The name VI string is just the name of the VI. You must apply for it to the correct server VI instance.

  This is the VI that works on my CRIO:

  

  Notice I had to specify the port instead of the default 3363 3364. Port 3364, that's what I configured VI server on my 'my computer' to listen.

  Nathan

• Remote procedure call cancelled - no solutions working - Server 2012, Windows 7

  I've been around on the internet looking for a solution to this. Everywhere wherever I'm going to bring a different solution, but nothing does nothing for me.

  Here's the problem:

  I have a client who has 19 laptops ready for employees. Of these 19, we want to allow employees to connect locally rather than connect to the domain.

  At first, I applied an update to group policy to the ORGANIZATIONAL unit for these devices. This update included policy allowing the local connection, exception of Directors remotely, WMI, allowing the guest accounts, and a couple unrelated. I also made sure the RPC services running automatically on these devices.

  The first time I ran the update, I had only local access connection strategy activated. For this update, 19 devices managed 5. After that I have included other policies, I got 10 succeed. 8 of them have the procedure remote call cancelled error. I think it is 800707 something or other code. The other 1 is not connected to the domain.

  Even now, however, invited still cannot connect locally.

  I won't be back in the Office of the customer until Tuesday, June 7. So until then, I can't give a lot of information. I'll take all what I need then.

  Please help me if you know the real solution. I've been everywhere in Google, so please do not just refer to something earlier, you have looked up.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  I suggest you to post your query on our Forums TechNet social as this question should be better there.

  Please refer to the reference to the link below to send your request:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home?Forum=w7itproui

  Hope this information helps.

  Please get back to us with an update on the issue, we will be happy to help you.

• How can I use - openURL remote without having to open a new tab?

  I have a kiosk based on the web that I built very long time (before tabbed browsing) that uses periodic calls to:

  Firefox-remote "openURL (http://start.csail.mit.edu/mit-museum)'

  to reset the kiosk to the homepage (the function depends on the web free-form only Browsing not a single sharp application that can recharge only periodically)

  Modern Firefoxes (now works with 12) this call always opens a new tab. I want to do is close all existing tabs but one and return this one to the home page.

  Is there a way to do it with one '-remote ' call or do I need to kill and restart the browser?

  in all: \windows\system32\conifg\system try to set "browser.link.open_newwindow.override.external" to 1

  Edit: Sorry, didn't read your question carefully, the above will only open an external url in the current tab but does not reset the session

• Threading and reuse of the node to call using reference of buffers (of the required adhesive tape)

  I tried to get the following information in the public domain for years and now that I have the answers, I'll share with those who might be interested.

  Caveat!

  Wrap your head in tape before reading just for the sake of security.

  My two questions were;

  (1) may LV re - use tampons of VI calling when you use VI serve call by reference?

  (2) is used when the use of call by reference UI thread?

  

  1 when you call a VI using the call through the reference node, the data in the pane of the copied or is node connector - this online as it would be with a Subvi properly implemented?

  Short answer: it's somewhere between the two.

  Long answer:

  The compiler does not know what will be called VI, but there a hint:

  the reference connected to the node of the call by reference. He uses to get the 'Prototype' for the call. Therefore, for optimal performance, use a prototype that has the same 'characteristics placeness' as it is called VI. That said, users don't know what are the "characteristics of the placeness.

  Before getting into the details, I will say that the overhead of these copies should not matter much unless it's a large data structure (a table with lots of items.) or a cluster/class with many fields or containing large networks etc..

  Example 1:

  If the prototype does not change the data, then the compiler assumes that the crux of the call by reference will not alter the data. However, at runtime, a check is made to see if the real called VI will modify the data. If Yes, then a copy is made and past so that the original data can be modified.

  Example 2:

  If the prototype contains an entry that is wired through an exit so that both input and output terminals can use the same buffer memory, but running an audit determines that the real called entry and exit VI do not share a buffer, then a copy will be made from output of the actual call to the original screws (combined input and output) buffer.

  I should also mention that, even with this behavior "are trying to get along with the prototype", it is not always possible to obtain good performance as a Subvi ordinary call. For example, if you have a situation where the prototype does not change the data and passes it through to an exit and then the compiler must assume that the data is changed (because, as in example 2, there are screws that may change even if the called real VI is not).

  And there are a few caveats:

  (1) this behavior "using a prototype" was new for 2009. Before that, we used a method more naïve data of passage that took all the entries will be changed and no outputs don't share a buffer with an entry.

  (2) this behavior can be changed in future versions, if we find additional optimizations.

  (3) this behavior is the same that we use for the dynamic distribution live (when you use the classes in LV)

  (4) If you want to create a VI can be used as a prototype, you can use the features of the Structure in Place to control the "characteristics of the placeness', namely the element nodes in and out of the border, the function"Mark as modifier"border nodes (note the pencil icon on the item), and the node always one copy.

  (5) the prototype is only the first reference ever connected to the node of the call by reference. So if you make a new prototype VI, you can just make a reference out of it plug into the crux of the call by reference. I suggest to remove the node from the call by reference and file a new.

  (6) for remote calls, we still "making copies" by transmitting data over a network.

  I hope that this helps, if you want information/clarification, so feel free to ask.

  2 - is the call made by the reference to run in the user interface thread node? If the call is made by a remote machine via ethernet, thread that host (the computer that makes the call by reference) runs on and thread that executes the target (the machine that contains the file VI) on?

  In the case of premises, the appeal made by the reference node does not require the user interface thread and may work in some thread the VI wants to run in.

  When you call a remote VI, the appeal made by the reference node uses the UI thread (detailed below) on both the client and the server.

  The client uses the UI thread to send the request to the server and there still when the response comes back. The user interface thread is not blocked during the time between the two.

  The server receives the TCP message in the UI thread, and then starts the call to the UI thread. The server also uses the user interface thread to send the response to the client. The user interface thread is not blocked on the server during execution of the VI.

  I hope that people find it when they need it!

  Ben

  
  

• Cannot connect remotely TestStand engine-17851

  Have had some strange behaviour tries to run the remote call in sequence. It works on certain combinations of PC, others do not! Ex.: A to B (and vice versa) works, C to D also works well, but has to C or C to A or B to D comes with the mistake-17851. As each station works at least with one partner, I expect that all the DCOM settings and configuration of remote engine are ok. This PC is on the same network, the same group, same configuration I see. TestStand version is 3.5 on all machines. Same Windows-TS-User and on all stations.

  Any idea or experience?

  SOLUTION FOUND:

  There must be a user who has logged on to the remote computer administrator privileges (as mentioned in the reference manual) and - very important - there must be a password set for these users.

  If a user without defined password logs on, Windows blocks all access remotely.

  Thanks for your support!

• TestStand remote EXE Server requires authorization?

  I would like to eventually integrate remote TestStand EXE Server on the operating system for our systems for purposes of remote control and testing during manufacturing and field service processes.

  Are there any requirements required for each installation of the remote server EXE TestStand?  Again, I would install this on every system we make.

  In my view, that Steven misunderstood your question, because you were making reference to the remote server EXE and not executing a sequence on the remote system.  You are free to install Remote Server EXE on any computer you want without obtaining an additional license.  Server remote EXE will allow you to call any executable (or open a file as specified by your operating system from TestStand 4.2) on this machine.  You must have a valid license on the computer that initiates the remote call and TestStand, but you are free to copy remote server EXE on remote machines as much as you want under your current license.

  P. Allen

  NEITHER