The file name can be printed on the exported images?

Similar Questions

• Error on startup: "application (the file name is) is not a valid windows image, check against your installation diskette."

  computer startup happens on the screen with "application (the file name is) is not a valid windows image, check against your installation diskette." It can be any name of a file that appears, if I click ok it will.  Anyone know what I should do now. Thank you

  Hi LorraineMatthews,

  ·         Did you do changes on the computer before the show?

  ·         What is the exact error message?

  ·         Are you able to boot to the desktop?

  Follow these methods.

  Method 1: Follow these steps:

  Step 1: Start the computer in safe mode and check if the problem persists.

  A description of the options to start in Windows XP Mode

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/315222

  Step 2: Perform a clean boot to see if there is a conflict of software like the clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

  How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

  Note: After the boot minimum troubleshooting steps, follow section How to configure Windows to use a Normal startup state of the link to return the computer to a Normal startupmode.

  After the clean boot used to resolve the problem, you can follow these steps to configure Windows XP to start normally.

  (a) click Start and then click Run.

  (b) type msconfig and click OK.

  (c) the System Configuration Utility dialog box appears.

  (d) click the general tab, click Normal Startup - load all services and device drivers and then click OK.

  (e) when you are prompted, click on restart to restart the computer.

  Method 2: Scan the file system (CFS) auditor to repair corrupted files.

  Description of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 System File Checker (Sfc.exe)

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310747

• I use Lightroom 5.7, 64-bit with Windows 7 Professional. Without apparent reason, I now get an error message when I export a photo, say a raw image to a JPG. However, the exported image seems to be OK. But now, I've noticed that my directory the files LR

  I use Lightroom 5.7, 64-bit with Windows 7 Professional. Without apparent reason, I now get an error message when I export a photo, say a raw image to a JPG. However, the exported image seems to be OK. But now, I noticed that my repertoire records in library view LR does not show images correctly: If there is a folder with subfolders, the folder contains 0 images, but sub records show the correct number of images. What happened and is there a solution? I tried to uninstall Lightroom and re - install, but the problem persists.

  Here is a screenshot of the error message:

  

  Post edited by: Joseph Costanza, Jr.

  See here for a solution.

• Last night my 5 Lightroom suddenly seems to update. A shooting blue veined lgo ratings appeared on my screen and many of my settings have been changed. My problem now is that when I export an image on my drive C:, the exported image n

  Last night my 5 Lightroom suddenly seems to update. A shooting blue veined lgo ratings appeared on my screen and many of my settings have been changed. My problem now is that when I export an image on my C: drive, the exported image is no longer automatically appears in my Picasa files as it has for years. How can I fix this please?

  Hello

  Greetings!

  In the export dialog box change the export after option.

  

  Concerning

  Jitendra

• [JS] PageItem Export in PNG: dimesion of the exported image differs from PageItem

  When I try to export a block of rectangular text to PNG with JavaScript, the result PNG image may have a larger dimension than the text block itself in InDesign. I think it has something to do with the height of the text line.

  Is there an export option that I can use to make the exported image size the same as the text block?

  Please see my attached photos for an example:

  • The block of text in InDesign has a dimension of 400 x 80 (pixels)

  

  • It's PNG exported, which has a dimesion of 400 x 96 (pixel). Notice the padding at the top and bottom of the image.

  

  Hmm - move any element "in" a rectangle is not a simple operation. Well, we're going to (ab) use 'app.copy' and 'app.paste' then, although, theoretically at least, it should be possible by manipulating objects.

  This duplicates the selected item, removes its contents, affects none line and filling, and then glue the original selection in a new. After export, the duplicated object is automatically deleted if you end up with what you started with.

  (Attention! Tested only with CS4!)

  obj = app.activeDocument.selection[0];
  cliprect = obj.duplicate(undefined, [0,0]);
  cliprect.texts[0].remove();
  cliprect.strokeWeight = 0;
  cliprect.fillColor = app.activeDocument.swatches.item("None");
  cliprect.contentType = ContentType.UNASSIGNED;
  app.copy();
  app.select(cliprect);
  app.pasteInto();
  cliprect.exportFile(ExportFormat.PNG_FORMAT, File(new File("~/Desktop/test.png")));
  cliprect.remove();
  

• Download the CSV reports region: a dynamic file name can be used?

  Request Express 3.1.1.00.09
  Oracle Database 10 g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64 bit
  Firefox 3.0.10
  
  Hi all
  
  In Application Builder-> attributes report-> export-> exit report CSV activate = 'Yes'
  
  I want to assign dynamic file name, based on a variable in the application.
  The text in this box always seems to be used as a literal value.
  
  I want to do possible?
  
  Kind regards
  Bob.

  Yes, in the report name field, you can use a page or application as file name... This is the syntax: & my_item. where my object is a page element or application...

  Thank you

  Tony Miller
  Webster, TX

• Insert "illegal" characters in file name for label printing?

  Hey all (Happy New Year)

  I actually see people here who have helped me with this there is responsible for so many years (Hello 'x'). Sort of, I use this .js file for annotate aerial images before printing, and I know just enough about scripts to make changes to the basic layout as the need arises - so far. A new retentive mgr rather anal don't like the replacements I did for some "illegal" characters that windows does not allow in file names. For example, the file name used for the annotation is:

  001 0003 1in = 660ft CFL 154_074 01-01014 503 - 013.tif

  But Mr. Bishop love not in, the ft and the use of the _ instead of a period (.), so what I need is a change that goes something like (and note that I DO NOT code, so stop laughing).

  "Find and replace by", find ft and replace by "and search for _ and replace by," so the final annotation written in the image is: ""

  001 0003 1 "= 660' CFL 154,074 01-01014 503 - 013.tif"

  My current .js is lower, I'd appreciate any help. Thank you! TLL

  ------------

  CREATE NEW CANVAS W/SPACE ON TOP

  var deltaW = 0; Add a "n" pixels to the width

  deltaH var = 150; Add "n" pixels to the height

  var anchor = AnchorPosition.BOTTOMCENTER; anchor point to resize canvas

  SET the FONT TYPE AND SIZE - use GetFontName.js to get the exact name

  fontName = 'ArialMT '; var

  var fontSize = 18;

  Check if a document is open

  If (documents.length > 0) {}

  var originalRulerUnits = preferences.rulerUnits;

  preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;

  try {}

  var docRef = activeDocument;

  docRef.resizeCanvas (docRef.width + deltaW, docRef.height + deltaH, anchor);

  Create a layer of text on the front

  var myLayerRef = docRef.artLayers.add ();

  myLayerRef.kind = LayerKind.TEXT;

  myLayerRef.name = "Filename";

  var myTextRef = myLayerRef.textItem;

  ADD the FILE EXTENSION, change the n y below

  var ShowExtension = "n";

  myTextRef.size = fontSize;

  myTextRef.font = fontName;

  COLOR of the TEXT PUT in RGB values

  newColor var = new SolidColor();

  newColor.rgb.red = 0;

  newColor.rgb.green = 0;

  newColor.rgb.blue = 0;

  myTextRef.color = newColor;

  SET TEXT POSITION - PIXELS left first, then the top.

  myTextRef.position = new Array (30 110);

  Set the blending Mode of the text layer. The name must be in UPPERCASE

  That is to say NORMAL change to the DIFFERENCE.

  myLayerRef.blendMode = BlendMode.NORMAL;

  Select opacity in percent

  myLayerRef.opacity = 100;

  The following code deletes the extension and wrote tha text layer.

  fname = filename only

  Use the extension if the value

  If (ShowExtension == 'y') {}

  fname = docRef.name;

  } else {}

  di = (DocRef.Name). IndexOf(".");

  fname = (docRef.name) .substr (0, di);

  }

  myTextRef.contents = fname;

  docRef.flatten ("n");

  } catch (e) {}

  An error has occurred. Restore units of the rule, and then spread the error return

  to the user

  preferences.rulerUnits = originalRulerUnits;

  throw e;

  }

  Everything went well. Restore units of the rule

  preferences.rulerUnits = originalRulerUnits;

  } else {}

  Alert ("you must have a document open to add the file name! ');

  }

  Here is the replacement code:

  The following code deletes the extension and wrote tha text layer.
  fname = filename only
                 
  fname = docRef.name;
  fname = fname.replace(/in/, ' "') .replace (/ pi /, ' '"); "

  remove the extension if needed
  If (ShowExtension! = 'y') {}
  fname = fname.match (/ [^.] + /) [0];
  }

  fname = fname.replace (/ _ /, '.');

  myTextRef.contents = fname;

  I sent the entire file by PM. This should work if there aren't any typos.

• Customization of file name when you use an external editor - only one file name can be used by all editors?

  I have a number of external publishers defined for my application of LR 3.3 Win7. In my preferences when I customize how an editor say, Photoshop CS5, maintains a file, I can put the name of the file edited - for example, {Filename} - ed.psd. However, if I change the name of file changed to another external editor, say to {file name} - SilverEfexPro.psd, this file name is used for all modified files externally. What I am doing wrong? Thank you!

  Dilip

  Dilip,

  You do not have something wrong. The file name pattern to use is valid for all external publishers defined. This can also be seen by looking at the section, where the file name pattern can be defined (not in the section where individual editors can be configured).

  Gossweiler beat

  Switzerland

• Changed file names, can now be updated files

  Help!  This morning I changed my file names domain name I purchased. In doing so, however, seems to prevent me from updating my pages. Now when I click on modify > library > Update Page, I get a message that says, "access file... error file not found (error - 43).

  I * think * the problem is with the name of the model. 60 pages I designed first of all have been built on the name of the original model, '2000 '. All of these pages still say "Templates/2000_template.dwt" at the top of the pages, as shown in this code snippet:

  < ! DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional / / IN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd" > ""
  " < html xmlns =" http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml "> <!-InstanceBegin template="/Templates/2000_template.dwt ' codeOutsideHTMLIsLocked = 'false'->
  < head >
  < meta http-equiv = "Content-Type" content = text/html"; Charset = UTF-8 "/ >"
  <!-InstanceBeginEditable name = "doctitle"-->.

  I am guessing that, because I changed the name of the template (as well as the file that is stored), the pages of the child does not recognize the new model and then not allow me to update the page.

  How to get out this correction? I can't change the name of the template on each page, as it is in a non-editable area. I have to travel and all my files rename to the original (and now incorrect) name I was working on some?

  Thanks to all those who can help you.

  If layout.css is listed twice, that probably means you have bound him

  twice in the code of your document. Look in the cephalic region of your

  source code of the page for a link twice. Make sure that you remove it

  duplicate with the incorrect file path.

  --

  Al Sparber - PVII

  http://www.Projectseven.com

  Menus in Dreamweaver | Galleries | Widgets

  http://www.Projectseven.com/go/HGM

  The Ultimate Web 2.0 carousel

• Why the last image of the exported image sequence is sometimes black?

  I get sequences of images in Photoshop and then exporting them to a file mp4 video.  For some reason, Photoshop sometimes decides to put a black frame at the end of the video, no matter what I try settings.  Sometimes it leaves aside the black frame.  I can't understand why he did this.  If anyone knows how to get rid of this?  When I import the resulting sequences first, I need to change all the frames of black.  Not impossible to deal with, but it is kind of a pain.

  Adobe Photoshop Version: 2014.2.2 20141204.r.310, 2014/12 / 04:23:59:59 CL 994532 x 64

  Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit

  Version: 6.1 Service Pack 1

  System architecture: AMD CPU Family: 15, model: 10, Stepping: 0 with MMX, entire SSE, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 FP

  Physical processor count: 6

  Processor speed: 3200 MHz

  Built-in memory: 8191 MB

  Free memory: 4507 MB

  Memory available to Photoshop: 7154 MB

  Memory used by Photoshop: 70%

  Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 (with the latest driver Version 347.88)

  Adobe Bridge 6.1.0.116 x 64

  Use, file-> open and checking the box 'Sequence of Image', I am loading a sequence of JPGs I've cropped in Photoshop (using a script to automate this process), and I specify 23.976 fps. I checked all the JPG files, and they are OK. I play the animation in Photoshop, and it looks good.  I then export the movie using the file-> export-> made video, I use Adobe Media Encoder, h.264 format, high quality, 1920 x 1080 (the original document size), 23.976 fps.  It automatically selects the zone selection to export work.  That seems correct.  In a sequence of images of N, it is said that it will export images 0 to N-1, which I think is OK if it indexes starting at 0 and not 1.  I tried to export (frames) checked, and the result is the same.  The last image is black.  I also tried to change the work area to remove the last image and the last frame of the rendered video is so dark, but the last image of the sequence, I opened is missing.  I checked the image sequence that was exported with the area of complete work (or frameworks) selected and all managers are there - with just a framework black, added at the end, which is certainly not in the work area.

  No error message.

  I checked the help, also I tried searching the forums, but I don't know what I'm doing wrong.

  The problem has been around on and off for a few years.  He had disappeared with CC, but now he's back, even though I'm not aware of what I'm doing differently.

• Blue tint to the exported images from LR 2.4

  A particular image, that I exported from LR appears slightly more blue than it does in the LR library. At first I thought it's maybe because I export from a raw image in sRGB and downsizing a lot, but this isn't the cause.

  If I take the image of LR and EDIT in PHOTOSHOP CS3 using TIFF 16 bits and ProPhoto and then in Photoshop manually reduce 640 pixels on its longest side, change it to 8 bits per channel and ProPhoto convert to sRGB, the resulting image is not this blue tint and, in my view, exactly looks the same as the view from LR library. But if I ask LR for export in a 8-bit sRGB TIFF and reduce the size of 640 pixels, with no job of sharpening, the result has the blue tint.

  I have attached a screenshot with LR in the background and two windows photoshop: the left one is photoshop glancing tiff that LR exported; the right is Photoshop showing the same image will be created manually as described in my second para. I find that one on the left has a bluish tint, particularly in the foliage over the arms of the shovel. Flicking between the two windows photoshop, the histogram is clearly more blue in the left.

  Of course, you can say well, "Photoshop isn't Lightroom, so there are small differences. I accept it. But the fact is that Photoshop agrees with LR, this is just EXPORT from LR service that produces a result that is more blue.

  No idea why this should be so? (I have not noticed this on other images)

  I find that quite strange for sRGB, BTW, because the color is the smallest space the most important, one might think, to have the perception during the conversion in it.

  It has historical reasons. When sRGB was designed none of this really existed yet. Recently the ICC made a new sRGB version which has no perceptual intent. You can use it in Photoshop, but strangely, Lightroom doesn't know how to use it.

  When you refer to the scale, I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean the alteration of color that occurs when mapping range of one color space to another? Sorry, I don't know anything about. But what at first glance seems odd is that why should the color of a pixel mapping be in any way affected by the values of adjacent pixels? (I guess this must be the case for effect "in areas with a lot of detail", as you suggest.

  I refer to the reduction of scale to 640 pixels wide that you do. It is very simply with an average value of the pixels within a zone to arrive at a new image of low resolution. For example, if your original is 3000 pixels wide, and you go to 500 pixels wide, you are averaging an area of 6 x 6 pixels (i.e. 36 pixels) for a single pixel value in the new image. In practice several different algorithms are used to do this, but the basic principle is the same. Lightroom evolves in a linear space, which means that the brightness (luminance) is a linear function of the values bit. This translates into the luminance of the final pixel being correct anything. Photoshop scales in the gamma corrected space of the profile document (gamma 1.8 for prophotoRGB and approximately 2.2 to sRGB). Gamma means that the lightness of a pixel is dependent on the value of bit powerlaw. This translates into the luminance is not always correct with the end result. Whether move you in linear space or corrected gamma issues only when you have lots of small details. Course, when you have a plan of color, no matter that you will come to the same value. However, if you have a lot of edges, there are an error of scale to gamma corrected space. This is detailed in a page I found a quick google here: http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma.html

  So scaling in linear space is preferable from the point of view correct color. However, it leads to the desaturation and maybe look less good.

  A second point that I would put to LR is this: no matter how you do this scaling, why you cannot export a file that resembles that on my screen of LR? The fact that they are different certainly suggests that LR does not use this linear gamma of scale displaying the pictures, then we could add "look, do go and stick to it; don't chop and move one feature from LR to another. »

  Here, you have run in one of the many peculiarities of Lightroom. Because it is made of the jpeg extracted in adobeRGB (in general), the scaling of the display in libraries and other is in a gamma corrected space and so resemble the Photoshop scale. To the point, there is no scale is done, but the view zoomed on is a rendering that is similar to using nearest neighbor scaling. For reasons of speed, it only displays a subset of the pixels. So, with an average of pixels is made. In addition, any color and sharpness noise reduction is applied in the zoomed view on. This means that the zoomed view on developing countries is often saturated. This can be a real problem. There are many images where this leads to completely wrong impression in the zoomed view on. An example would be an image of Christmas lights that will look very colorful with zoom out but when zoom you 1:1 (or go to the library) they lose all color because the color noise reduction, which is then applied. Sea of flowers in the grass, light neon, colored fabrics, etc., are other examples. If you have a lot of microdetail, only display that's really right in Lightroom to develop is the view of 1:1. This is largely fixed in LR 3 BTW, where he restores to a larger size, including the reduction of noise and sharpening and then further reduced to develop.

  I realize that you are not responsible for the LR... no bad vibes intended

  Not bad actually. I love Lightroom, but realize that there are many gaps. In my work, I do a lot of scientific image processing and I'm always curious to see how things are really make.

• Gray film on the exported images?

  Whenever I have save a file from Photoshop or as .psd, .jpg, .pdf etc, there is an almost transparent grayish film on the whole image that ruins the image. Why is this and how to stop it?

  Refer to this as a first step, and then do a few read more on color, Gamma management and such things:

  My colors are different outside of Photoshop.

  Mylenium

• 1. an other than sfcdetails.txt file name can be used in the findstr command line? Explain your answer.

  1 what is the purpose of the edit command?

  2 explain the purpose of the takeown command when replacing a system file.

  3 explain why the icacls command is necessary in the process of.

  4 list some ways that you can find a good copy of the corrupted system file.

  Is this your homework?

• 'output file name' application before printing.

  Try to print from a program of writing music... but the message above - not he had ideas... How do I remeove it?

  Thank you

  James

  The easier (and first) first things:

  "[Print to FIle" is checked in the print options?

• The size of the exported Image

  I have my plan of work set to 700 px x 700 px. When I export in PNG file is px 2917 x 2917 px. Why isn't the size, I put?

  You have changed the shape of resolution from 72 DPI to something else.