the lines updated in response to conditions in the subquery is me stumping

Similar Questions

• Why SESSION 1 can see the line update?

  --- SESSION 1
  SQL> select * from test;
  ID         NAME
  -----     --------
  1          A
  2          B
  3          C
  SQL> update test set name = 'D' where id = 1;
  1 rows updated
  SQL> 
  SQL> rem  uncommitted this transaction
  SQL>
  SQL> select * from test;
  ID         NAME
  -----     --------
  1          D
  2          B
  3          C
  
  ---- SESSION 2
  SQL>
  SQL> select * from test;
  ID         NAME
  -----     --------
  1          A
  2          B
  3          C
  SQL>
  SQL>

  Question:
  Why SESSION 1 can see the line update? If the transaction had not been validated. before you see the updated row, which the database to submit to win the line?
  I know that SESSION 2 can not see the update line, since it occurs compatible read.

  Lonion wrote:

  --- SESSION 1
  SQL> select * from test;
  ID         NAME
  -----     --------
  1          A
  2          B
  3          C
  SQL> update test set name = 'D' where id = 1;
  1 rows updated
  SQL>
  SQL> rem  uncommitted this transaction
  SQL>
  SQL> select * from test;
  ID         NAME
  -----     --------
  1          D
  2          B
  3          C
  
  ---- SESSION 2
  SQL>
  SQL> select * from test;
  ID         NAME
  -----     --------
  1          A
  2          B
  3          C
  SQL>
  SQL>
  

  Question:
  Why SESSION 1 can see the line update? If the transaction had not been validated. before you see the updated row, which the database to submit to win the line?

  SESSION 1 can see the data that changed since the SESSION 1 fact change.

  I know that SESSION 2 can not see the update line, since it occurs compatible read.

• Line update does not update in the data of table view

  Hello
  
  I have Developer SQL 3.0.04 running on Windows XP.
  
  In the view of the table (Data tab) of the SENSOR table, after update of a line, I do not see the change. It's always the old value that is displayed. I managed to see if the table has been updated and it has been on sqlplus. After 'engage', I could see the same thing.
  
  The update statement has been:
  
  UPDATE safege.sensor SET lastacq = (select max (raw_date) of safege.msr_3566) where cmt = "W090QR01M002."
  
  And I got the answer "1 line Update". But when I look at I can't see the changes, still the old value.
  
  I tried to select
  Select lastacq from the probe where cmt = "W090QR01M003."
  and I could see that the change was made
  
  It was only after the closing of the view table and reopening, I could see the change presented in this table.
  
  It is a big problem for me because if I can't trust what I see under Developer slq, then I doubt on what I'm doing, if I'm really updating the table or what.
  
  
  Thank your for your entry.
  
  Christian

  I've seen a few bugs with 3.0.x, but I'm not sure you hit a bug. I have woked with 3.1 and 2.x versions and I didn't see this problem.
  Try to use the 3.1.x or 2.x version, I hope it is and must solve the problem.

  Kind regards
  http://www.oracleracexpert.com
  RMAN Oracle 11 g new features
  http://www.oracleracexpert.com/2011/12/Oracle-recovery-managerrman-new.html

• Behavior of high N lines updated with subquery sessions and parallel

  Hello

  I have the following scenario:

  {code}

  SQL > create table aaa12 (date start_time, id1 number (1) Primary key, the number of status)

  ((1), buffer_id number (2) default null);

  Table created.

  SQL > insert into aaa12 (the value of start_time, id1, status)

  trunc(sysdate-level) select 2, level 6, 1 double

  3. connect by level < 6;

  5 rows created.

  SQL > validation

  2;

  Validation complete.

  SQL > select * from aaa12;

  START_TIM STATUS BUFFER_ID ID1

  --------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  JUNE 10, 13 5 1

  JUNE 9, 13 4 1

  JUNE 8, 13 3 1

  JUNE 7, 13 2 1

  JUNE 6, 13 1 1

  SQL > update aaa12

  2 set buffer_id = 1,

  3 status = 2

  4 where in (select id1 id1

  5 of (select id1

  aaa12 6

  7 where status = 1

  Order 8 by start_time ASC)

  9 where rownum < = 2)

  10 - and status = 1

  11;

  2 lines to date.

  {code}

  Notice that I have not yet commit.

  Now on a 2nd session I play the same update, only set buffer_id = 2:

  {code}

  SQL > update aaa12

  2 set buffer_id = 2,

  3 status = 2

  4 where rowid in (select rowid

  5 of (select rowid

  aaa12 6

  7 where status = 1

  Order 8 by start_time ASC)

  9 where rownum < = 2)

  10 - and status = 1

  11;

  {code}

  Expectations of update above (locked). Now let's commit the 1st session:

  {code}

  Validation complete.

  SQL > select * from aaa12;

  START_TIM STATUS BUFFER_ID ID1

  --------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  JUNE 10, 13 5 1

  JUNE 9, 13 4 1

  JUNE 8, 13 3 1

  JUNE 7, 13 2 2 1

  JUNE 6, 13 1 2 1

  SQL >

  {code}

  and we'll see what happened during the 2nd session:

  {code}

  2 lines to date.

  SQL >-after 1st session committed

  SQL > select * from aaa12;

  START_TIM STATUS BUFFER_ID ID1

  --------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  JUNE 10, 13 5 1

  JUNE 9, 13 4 1

  JUNE 8, 13 3 1

  JUNE 7, 13 2 2 2

  JUNE 6, 13 1 2 2

  SQL >

  {code}

  It updated the same lines, even if their status should no longer be 1 committed after 1st session.

  I guess what happens is that the subquery is performed on the time of execution of the update statement - which means that the subquery is read so coherent to reinstate the same lines.

  but now if I do the same thing, but a comment the external status = 1 as part of the where the update in addition to the subquery - it seems to work:

  I dropped the table, recreated, inserted the same 5 lines and now start the new updates:

  {code}

  SQL > update aaa12

  2 set buffer_id = 1,

  3 status = 2

  4 where in (select id1 id1

  5 of (select id1

  aaa12 6

  7 where status = 1

  Order 8 by start_time ASC)

  9 where rownum < = 2)

  10 and status = 1

  11;

  2 lines to date.

  SQL > select * from aaa12;

  START_TIM STATUS BUFFER_ID ID1

  --------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  JUNE 10, 13 5 1

  JUNE 9, 13 4 1

  JUNE 8, 13 3 1

  JUNE 7, 13 2 2 1

  JUNE 6, 13 1 2 1

  {code}

  updated even with buffer_id = 2 on 2nd session:

  {code}

  SQL > update aaa12

  2 set buffer_id = 2,

  3 status = 2

  4 where rowid in (select rowid

  5 of (select rowid

  aaa12 6

  7 where status = 1

  Order 8 by start_time ASC)

  9 where rownum < = 2)

  10 and status = 1

  11;

  {code}

  session is locked, now after commit 1st session - session 2 updated and table looks like:

  {code}

  2 lines to date.

  SQL > select * from aaa12;

  START_TIM STATUS BUFFER_ID ID1

  --------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  JUNE 10, 13 5 1

  JUNE 9, 13 4 2 2

  JUNE 8, 13 3 2 2

  JUNE 7, 13 2 2 1

  JUNE 6, 13 1 2 1

  {code}

  I have 2 questions:

  1. How is the 2nd scenario works and the subquery does not limit the update for the same 2 lines so that the update will update anything?

  2 in case I have a table with many rows and I need to process the records in order, but want to do it in parallel - if I have 1000 lines of process and each session can handle 500 - I don't want to wait for the other, but work on different lines simultaneously. Is this possible without having to open a cursor with a SELECT... UPDATE SKIP LOCKED? because then I would have more than 500 lines of loop and do an update by records, which seems unwise to good performance.

  Any help/advice would be appreciated.

  Thank you

  -Mor

  Sorry, I missed a major difference between the two cases. And it's write consistency. There are some situations where UPDATE or DELETE are realizing that they cannot maintain consistency of statement-level and are forced to do a restore 'mini' (which may not be so "tiny") and start over. One of these cases is as follows. We have a UPDATE/DELETE with a WHERE clause. So we start to extract the rows that match WHERE clause. And we meet a line whose value to adapt the WHERE clause when statement has started now, but it is not. And that's exactly what is happening here. When the session 2 publishes the UPDATED session 1 did not err again. As a result, lines of June 6 & 7 correspond to the WHERE clause and must therefore be updated. However, they are locked by session 1. When the session commits 1, locks are released and session 2 could proceed with the updating of these two lines. However, to write rules of coherence mandate session 2 to check if WHERE clause is always true and realize that it's not. This causes a mini-restauration and UPDATE again. Now sinus session already committed 1, session 2 sees all of the changes and lines of June 6 & 7 do not match WHERE clause more (status = 2). So first of all (by START_TIM) two rows with STATUS = 1 are now June 8 & 9. That is why the session 2 updates the.

  SY.

• Problem with update of table (using the subquery to retrieve value)

  Hello
  I update a table based on the value of the subquery.
  Here's the update statement.
  
  UPDATING temp xm
  SET xm.col1 = (SELECT DISTINCT col1
  Of
  (SELECT col1, col2 COUNT (col2)
  FROM table2
  WHERE col1 = xm.col1
  AND col2 = xm.col2
  GROUP BY col1)
  where col2 in (select... in the table3)
  )
  WHERE xm.col5 = < value >
  AND xm.col6 = < value >
  
  When I run this statement I get following error.
  ORA-00904: "XM". "" Col1 ": invalid identifier.
  
  Can someone help me why I get this error?
  Why doesn't the main table alias in the subquery?
  
  Is it possible to avoid this / re - write the query in a different way?
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: user552703 on November 2, 2009 20:42

  You can nest only 1 level deep (referring to the table to be updated).

  Have you looked at using the MERGE command? It is "easier" perform updates of this nature, assuming you are using a recent version of Oracle (9 or MORE).

• Oracle PL/SQL using decode/case in the subquery

  SELECT DISTINCT E.ACC_ID,
  P.EFFECTIVE_DATE,
  P.UPDATE_DATE
  (CHOOSE abc.def table in case RECON_ACC.partition_id is 1 for this acc_id
  abc100.def if RECON_ACC.partition_id 2 table for this acc_id
  ) p
  JOIN IN-HOUSE
  (select * from RECON_ACC where id_partition is NOT NULL) e
  ON P.ACC_ID = E.ACC_ID
  AND TRUNC (P.UPDATE_DATE) > = December 31, 13 '
  AND TRUNC (P.UPDATE_DATE) < = 2 January 14 ';

  Can someone help me to do a SQL query to do this?

  Hello

  If you had only a table of def, then it would be easy

  .  You need only a simple join, like this:

  SELECT ud.acc_id, ud.effective_date, ud.update_date

  Of unified_def ud

  JOIN recon_acc r ON ra.partition_id = ud.partition_id

  AND ra.acc_id = ud.acc_id - can - be

  ;

  The only problem here is that you have 2 separate tables def.  Assistance from the UNION, you can create a result set that makes these 2 tables appear as 1; for example:

  WITH date_range AS

  (

  SELECT TO_DATE (November 1, 2013 00:00:00 ', 'HH24:MI:SS of Mon-DD-YYYY') AS first_date

  , TO_DATE (November 20, 2013 23:59:59 ', 'HH24:MI:SS of Mon-DD-YYYY') AS last_date

  OF the double

  )

  unified_def AS

  (

  SELECT d1.effective_date, d1.update_date, d1.acc_id

  1 AS id_partition

  To abc_def d1

  JOIN date_range r1 WE d1.update_date BETWEEN r1.first_date

  AND r1.last_date

  UNION ALL

  SELECT d2.effective_date, d2.update_date, d2.acc_id

  2 AS id_partition,

  Abc100_def D2

  JOIN date_range r2 WE d2.update_date BETWEEN r2.first_date

  AND r2.last_date

  )

  SELECT ud.acc_id, ud.effective_date, ud.update_date

  Of unified_def ud

  JOIN recon_acc r ON ra.partition_id = ud.partition_id

  AND ra.acc_id = ud.acc_id - can - be

  ;

  I called def small tables abc_def and abc100_def, just so I wouldn't have to create new patterns.  Replace your real names when you run this.

  I added the subquery date_range as a means of conveying the date settings.  You can do something else, bind variable may be.

  I guess just in between the recon_acc and other tables join conditions.  Do you still need recon_acc at all with this problem?

  Once more, this problem only occurs because you have 2 separate tables def.  Why you store your data in a way that creates problems?  Is there a reason why you can't use only 1 table unified_def?

• Scope of violation in the subquery

  I created a sql in the database to Oracle 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 to purchase Oracle query tables. The user wants to know an estimate of the number of days it takes to approve a release as soon as it is created. I created a subquery, as follows:
  
  Select Papf.Full_Name as the approver
  Pah.Action_Date as Approved_Date
  Por.Creation_Date
  , Trunc (Pah.Action_Date) - Trunc (Por.Creation_Date) days
  (Select Count (*)
  From (select level, (Pah.Action_Date + 1) - level double My_Date)
  Connect by level < Trunc(Pah.Action_Date+1) - Trunc (por.creation_Date)
  () Where To_Char (My_Date, 'DY') ('MON', 'Mar', 'SEA', 'Game', 'Ven')) As Days2Approve
  …
  OF Apps.Po_Headers_All Poh
  Apps.Po_Releases_All Por
  Apps.Po_Lines_All Pol
  …
  Apps.Po_Action_History Pah
  ... etc.
  
  When I run the application, I get the following error message:
  
  ORA-00904: "POR". "' CREATION_DATE ': invalid identifier
  00904, 00000 - '% s: invalid identifier '.
  * Cause:
  * Action:
  Error on line: 193 column: 54
  
  I know that the subquery conceptually strong because if I run the sql below with fake dates I get 17 which is correct.
  
  Select Count (*)
  From (SELECT level, (to_date (January 24, 2013 ') + 1)-level my_date From Dual)
  Connect by level < Trunc (To_Date('24-JAN-2013') + 1) - Trunc (To_Date('01-JAN-2013'))
  ) Where To_Char (My_Date, 'DY') ('MON', 'Mar', 'SEA', 'Game', 'Ven')
  
  How do Pah.Action_Date & por.creation_Date the subquery without getting what appears to be brought for violation?
  …

  Hello

  You can avoid the problem by not using is not a nested subquery:

  (
      SELECT  COUNT (*)
      FROM    dual
      CONNECT BY   LEVEL  < TRUNC (pah.action_date + 1)
                 - TRUNC (por.creation_date)
      WHERE   TO_CHAR ( pah.action_date + 1 - LEVEL
                        , 'DY'
                ) NOT IN ('SAT', 'SUN')
  ) AS days2approve
  

  I hope that answers your question.
  If not, post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) for all of the tables involved and also publish outcomes from these data.
  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
  See the FAQ forum {message identifier: = 9360002}

• The subquery support

  Hello
  
  I have a question that makes some joined and has a subquery in there as well. My problem is that sometimes the subquery returns more than 1 row (max 2) and it will make the request fails. I know that fixing data should be the right thing to do, but how it would be possible to overcome this problem? The criterion is that when it returns 2 rows, he should choose the second so, using ROWNUM = 1 will not work.
  
  Any advice?
  
  Thank you!
  
  Example:
  

  SELECT A.TEST, B.CASE,(SELECT C.SOMETHING FROM TABLE C WHERE A.TEST=C.TEST) AS TEST
  FROM TABLE A, TABLE B
  WHERE A.ID=B.ID

  Published by: n on 2013-mar-06 09:29

  Hello

  In Oracle, you cannot use the AS keyword when you assign a table alias.
  Change

  ...
  FROM    (
              SELECT  ...
          )  AS w
  ...
  

  TO

  ...
  FROM    (
              SELECT  ...
          )   w    -- Can't use AS here
  ...
  

  This is different from SQL Server. If you think that Oracle is confused and incoherent, you have company.

  N wrote:
  ... The tables are huge, even given.

  This is why you must create small test tables and fill them with a few lines of sample data, with the results you can find manually. Given that you should do this anyway, just for your own testing and debugging, it is easy to post if you want other people to help.

• Using the value of the column in the subquery?

  Hello friends. Because I didn't realize anything today, although focusing on the problem for hours, I would like to ask you a question.
  
  I have a report based on a query. The following statement is the minimum to avoid confusion between you:
  

  select cnt_gebiet, null work, 1 cs from tbl_gebiet
  
  union
  
  select 
  a.lng_gebiet,
  case when (select max(a.lng_arbeitsschritt) from 
  tbl_arbeit_zu_gebiet a, tbl_arbeitsschritte_neu b
  where 
  a.lng_arbeitsschritt = b.cnt_arbeitsschritt and b.lng_typ_arbeitsschritt = 3) = 1 then 0 else (select max(a.lng_arbeitsschritt) from 
  tbl_arbeit_zu_gebiet a, tbl_arbeitsschritte_neu b
  where 
  a.lng_arbeitsschritt = b.cnt_arbeitsschritt and b.lng_typ_arbeitsschritt = 3) end as lng_arbeitsschritt,
  2 cs
  from tbl_arbeit_crit_date a inner join tbl_arbeitsschritte_neu b on a.lng_arbeitsschritt = b.cnt_arbeitsschritt 
  where a.lng_arbeitsschritt = 1
  order by  cnt_gebiet asc, cs asc 

  My problem:
  
  I need to add the cnt_gebiet criteria to the query

  select max(a.lng_arbeitsschritt) from 
  tbl_arbeit_zu_gebiet a, tbl_arbeitsschritte_neu b
  where 
  a.lng_arbeitsschritt = b.cnt_arbeitsschritt and b.lng_typ_arbeitsschritt = 3 

  Do you have any idea how I can the union row, using the value of line (cnt_gebiet) of the above query as a criterion in the subquery resp. lower?

  skahlert,

  Something like this might work:

  
  WITH upper_query 
  
       AS ()SELECTcnt_gebiet   
  
                  NULL WORK , 
  
                  1 cs    
  
           DE tbl_gebiet   
  
           UNION
  
           SELECT a . lng_gebiet , 
  
                  CASE
  
                    WHEN (SELECTMax(a. lng_arbeitsschritt )  
  
                          DE tbl_arbeit_zu_gebiet a ,    
  
                                 tbl_arbeitsschritte_neu b 
  
                          OÙ a . lng_arbeitsschritt = b . cnt_arbeitsschritt    
  
                                 ET b . lng_typ_arbeitsschritt = 3 )=1     
  
                    THEN 0 
  
                    Else (SELECTMax(a. lng_arbeitsschritt )  
  
                          DE tbl_arbeit_zu_gebiet a ,    
  
                                 tbl_arbeitsschritte_neu b 
  
                          OÙ a . lng_arbeitsschritt = b . cnt_arbeitsschritt    
  
                                 ET b . lng_typ_arbeitsschritt = 3 )   
  
                  END AS lng_arbeitsschritt ,  
  
                  2 cs   
  
           DE tbl_arbeit_crit_date a    
  
                  INTERIOR JOIN them tbl_arbeitsschritte_neu b   
  
                    ON a . lng_arbeitsschritt = b . cnt_arbeitsschritt   
  
           OÙ a . lng_arbeitsschritt = 1    
  
           ORDER BY cnt_gebiet CSA ,   
  
                    cs CSA ) 
  
  SELECT Max (a. lng_arbeitsschritt ) 
  
  DE tbl_arbeit_zu_gebiet a ,    
  
         tbl_arbeitsschritte_neu b , 
  
         upper_query
  
  OÙ a . lng_arbeitsschritt = b . cnt_arbeitsschritt    
  
         ET b . lng_typ_arbeitsschritt = 3   
  
         ET upper_query . cnt_gebiet = : variable   
  

  Jeff

• Oracle db bad result on the subquery error

  Hello
  
  I work with Oracle databases up to 10 g and I found an error and could not find any documentation on this subject yet. Maybe you can help me.
  
  The error is fairly easy to reproduce. If you run the following query in adapting the parameters that you should get a result, the problem is that you should get only an error!
  
  Select * from user_tab_columns
  where table_name in
  (
  Select table_name from < TABLE_B >
  );
  
  Parameter: TABLE_B
  Description: This must be an existing table in the schema that is not any field from the table table_name.
  
  As I said, the subquery is false, so if you try to run separately it fails. The problem is when you run the two together because, if the link field has the same name, it returns all the values in the table in the outer query.
  
  Do you know if this is solved a specific patch of 10g or 11g?
  
  Thanks in advance for your interest.
  
  Best regards
  Leo ([email protected])

  This isn't a mistake, given that table_name is a valid column in the external table name. If you start using table alias names in front of the column names, you will get the error.

  example of

  SQL> select * from user_tab_columns u
    2  where u.table_name in
    3  (select d.table_name from dual d
    4  );
  (select d.table_name from dual d
          *
  ERROR at line 3:
  ORA-00904: "D"."TABLE_NAME": invalid identifier
  

  What oracle is without any alias table corresponds to this selection:

  SQL> select count(*) from user_tab_columns u
    2  where u.table_name in
    3  (select u.table_name from dual d
    4  );
  
    COUNT(*)
  ----------
        3553
  
  SQL> 
  

  including.

  Published by: Sven w. on July 24, 2009 17:27

• creating table using joins in the subquery

  can we create a table using joins in the subquery?
  Like this
  create table emp in select * from employee e, Department d
  where d.department_id = e.department_id
  ??
  We can?

  987018 wrote:
  We can?

  Yes, as long as you column alias names common to both tables to make them unique.

  SY.

• How to define a WHERE clause of the subquery in a bean managed?

  Hi people,
  
  is it possible to define the place where clause of a subquery in a bean managed?
  For example, it is more SQL charly:
  
  SELECT * FROM
  (SELECT Person.Name
  OF the person)
  
  To change or add a WHERE clause, I use following code for the 'viewObject: view
  
  String whereClause = "ROWNUM < =: numberOfRows;
  viewObject.setWhereClause (whereClause);
  
  viewObject.defineNamedWhereClauseParam ("numberOfRows", null, null);
  viewObject.setNamedWhereClauseParam ("numberOfRows", new Number (100));
  
  AttributeList myattr = this.getNamedWhereClauseParams ();
  viewObject.setNamedWhereClauseParams (myattr);
  
  For example, this code works well for the first SELECT statement limit the output to the first 100 results. But how do I add a WHERE clause of the subquery in a managed bean? For example, when I want to limit the names of people that begin with the letter "A"?
  The query should look like this:
  
  SELECT * FROM
  (SELECT Person.Name
  OF the person
  WHERE Person.Name LIKE 'A %')
  
  Anyone know more?
  
  Thank you!

  Put a variable binding in your query, something like:

  where (: bv is null) or (xxx love: bv)

  John

• Passing parameters to the subquery

  I have a model data, as shown below. I need to use a subquery to exclude a certain subset of folder, but the subquery depends on user, in this example, parameters: months and: year, but it doesn't seem to work, I get an error saying: invalid parameter index: 2
  
  With recognition would appreciate any help in this regard.
  
  
  < name of dataTemplate = 'WMS' description = 'WMS Detail' than one dataSourceRef = "Oracle BI EE" >
  < dataQuery >
  < sqlStatement = 'RP' name > <! [CDATA [select F1721. WARRANTY8
  of JDE. F1721 F1721
  where F1721. CNDJ = null
  and F1721. CDTE > =: Refdate
  and F1721. Warranty8 not in (select F551720A. WARRANTY8
  of JDE. F551720A F551720A
  where F551720A. MATH01 =: months
  and F551720A. MATH02 =: year)
  Order of F1721. Warranty8]] >
  < / sqlStatement >
  < / dataQuery >
  < dataStructure >
  < name of group = 'RP' source = 'RP' >
  < element name = "Warranty8" value = "f1721.an8" / >
  < / Group >
  < / dataStructure >
  < / dataTemplate >

  HI Dominic

  Add the parameter section

• Small square boxes, which appear on empty lines (UPDATED) - the question is, how to get rid of them?

  As for my display name "all I tried were in use"-when I registered on the Adobe site to use the Lab browser, I tried something like 10 or 12 user names and finally gave up and is gone with ' all I tried were in use "-my name is Bob

  ------------------------------- UPDATE --------------------

  The problem, small square boxes showing on the lines Freetext tool reviews, is not limited to blank lines, as I originally reported here. These boxes are appearing at the end of each line. It does not matter whether or not the line break is hard or soft, if the line is empty.

  Please read the original message, taking into account the fact that the problem occurred at the end of all lines.

  Also - Here's a screenshot of part of a comment area, showing the square lines. I didn't show the entire box because the material above the area I'm showing is a tad private or confidential. Here is the picture showing the boxes - note that there is no box at the end of the last line in the comment.

  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------

  -Original message-

  We have a copy of Acrobat 5.0. and so far he has done what we need, which is not much more to add bookmarks, links, and some retouching. I know it is very old and I know that things are changing. I hope that this has nothing to do with the version we use. I think it is a problem of compatibility if this is a problem with the newer versions of PDFs with reader 'edition' with 5.0.

  I have small square boxes appear on empty lines. (read my update above -boxes are at the end of all lines, conditional jump or jump) )

  I'm a programmer (37 years and more and more aspects of the processing of data) and I decided to learn PHP programming "language" to add some treatment of some of my web sites on the server side. So, I found a pretty good php to PDF manual and would use.

  I quickly found that the PDF didn't have one link and no Favorites, so I've been adding them as I search for a particular topic. I am also add comments and notes to document things not in the original manual or add comments that would help other programmers (who know other languages) to fit like the PHPs think - for example: in all the other languages I know (perhaps two dozen) to get rid of a file, 'delete you '. In PHP "unlink you" it.

  I added a lot of comments and notes like that and when I view the PDF in Reader (on this computer I 9.4.2) I see little boxes square on empty lines. The lines were created when I pressed ENTER twice to insert a blank line between paragraphs. (again, read the update at the top of this message - boxes are at the end of all lines, conditional jump or jump)

  How can I get rid of them?

  They are not present when I open with Acrobat PDF, only when I use an Acrobat Reader.

  They are also not present if I look at the comments using the comments navigation panel - in other words, they always show on the page, but they do not show in the copy of the comment displayed in the navigation panel.

  They are not present in the Notes or when I use one of the shape tools (square, circle or line tool) to create notes. They are no longer present in the Comments of Freetext tool

  They clearly show where there is a line successive characters feed/carriage return - but how can I get rid of them?

  I JUST THOUGHT of SOMETHING - I realized that I had not printed the pages on which I placed the comments and I was wondering if the boxes appear when you print the PDF file with reader - they don't. They are not present if I use Acrobat, not a reader, to print the same page.

  You can provide any assistance will be greatly appreciated.

  Please don't tell me to get a newer version - an expense that is simply and completely out of the picture. For us, it is a depression, not a recession - we are independent and our businesses have been severely hammered since 2006 - we are at about 1/4 of our profit before the big players trashed the economy.

  Bob

  P.S. Do you know that you can have a heart attack without pain in the chest, shortness of breath, or left arm pain? Well, you can! I had two and one almost killed me because I had no idea it was a heart attack. You can read about it here first one. Convey this, it could save a life.

  My second heart attack took place October 4, 20112 - he started, about 03:15, as did one, with a headache. It turns out the implanted stent in 2002 had been completely clogged by too many cultured tissue. The doctor put another stent inside one.
  

  Problem solved - it is a police problem. Apparently Acrobat cannot manage specific fonts and it is best to stick to a very small selection of font - Arial, Helvetica, Times Roman.

  I have not test a large number of fonts. If I do, I'll post there results here.

  Bob

• Data are not updated in OBI until execution of the counts of line update

  Hello:
  
  When the data are updated in my data source (SQL Server 2000) it doesn´t updating of dashboards and responses until I run the update to line against my physical table.
  
  This is the first time this has happened. Someone had the same problem? How do you solve it?
  
  
  Best regards

  Use that dirty read option to read uncommitted data, check whether the database is engaged after the new ETL updated...