Using the HAVING clause

Similar Questions

• How to generate the HAVING clause?

  Hi all
  
  When I add a function like the SUM, the code generates the "group by" clause by default. I also want to generate the clause "have" about it, how to do this in ODI?
  
  -Ian.

  Hello

  In your interface drag and drop the source column in the Web for which you want to generate the HAVING clause.
  It will create filters for columns. Now use the aggregation works like SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG etc. in this filter query.

  The generated code will now contain the inside HAVING clause.

  Thank you
  Fati

• Query with the having clause

  Hi all

  I have this select statement to help to filter different from zero records.

  Select GroupName, Nom_liste,

  Sum ((a_cost/1000) * degradation * quantity * total_count * index) such as total_cost,.

  FROM MyTable

  having sum ((a_cost/1000) * degradation * quantity * total_count * index) <>0

  Group GroupName, Nom_liste

  Having done so the query to run more slowly.

  How can I filter records with zero total_cost (they can be negative or greater than zero).

  Thank you!

  Hello

  user9542267 wrote:

  Hi all

  I have this select statement to help to filter different from zero records.

  Select GroupName, Nom_liste,

  Sum ((a_cost/1000) * degradation * quantity * total_count * index) such as total_cost,.

  FROM MyTable

  having sum ((a_cost/1000) * degradation * quantity * total_count * index) <> 0

  Group GroupName, Nom_liste

  Having done so the query to run more slowly.

  How can I filter records with zero total_cost (they can be negative or greater than zero).

  Thank you!

  The query you posted should not take more time with or without the HAVING clause.  The right of the comma before 'from' causes a compilation error very quickly anyway.

  If you get no result other than an error message, then this is not the code you are running.  Show the code you actually run, or a simplified version that has the same problem.

  For all performance issues, see the FAQ forum:

  https://community.Oracle.com/message/9362003#9362003

  If the problem was really in the HAVING clause, then you can try something like this:

  WITH got_total_cost AS
  (
  SELECT GroupName, Nom_liste
  , SUM ((a_cost/1000) * degradation * quantity * total_count * index) SUCH as total_cost
  FROM MyTable
  GROUP BY GroupName, Nom_liste
  )
  SELECT *.
  OF got_total_cost
  WHERE as total_cost <> 0
  ;

  but it would be very surprising he made all the difference.  I suspect that the problem is not really in the HAVING clause.

• using the WITH Clause

  The sql statement is
  
  Select ename, job
  from emp, dept
  where emp.deptno = dep.deptno
  and emp.deptno = 10
  Union
  Select ename, job
  from emp, dept
  where emp.deptno = dep.deptno
  and emp.deptno = 20
  
  the statement above using the WITH Clause
  
  WITH dept10 AS
  (select ename, job, hiredate, sal, comm, dname, emp.deptno
  from emp, dept
  where emp.deptno = dept.deptno
  and emp.deptno = 10)
  dept20 AS
  (select ename, job, hiredate, sal, comm, dname, emp.deptno
  from emp, dept
  where emp.deptno = dept.deptno
  and emp.deptno = 20)
  SELECT *.
  OF dept10
  UNION
  SELECT *.
  OF dept20
  
  Correct me if I'm wrong...
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  SeenuGuddu wrote:
  the Question is how u would provide the statement above by using the Clause

  The answer is that the question is meaningless. You will not use a WITH clause for this work.

  Because you must use a WITH clause to get the same results as the first query, I think the best way would be:

  WITH     unnecessary_sub_query     AS
  (
       select DISTINCT
                  ename, job
  --     ,      hiredate, sal, comm, dname,emp.deptno     -- these columns are not in the original query
       from      emp
       ,      dept
       where      emp.deptno = dept.deptno
       and      emp.deptno IN (10, 20)
  )
  SELECT  *
  FROM     unnecessary_sub_query;
  

  is this correct using Clause WITH or correct me

  No, it's not ok to make queries more complex or slow they need to do.
  In addition to the extra columns, it seems that the second query that you posted (the one who has a WITH clause) produces the same results as the first request.

• Use the nologging clause

  Hi, I tried to use the nologging clause to improve the performance of DML on one of the table. However I have observed this table with nologging option actually decreases performance :(
  Please see the next newspaper.
  
  SQL > create table test_log (int id, name char (40))
  2.
  
  Table created.
  
  Elapsed time: 00:00:00.03
  SQL > create table test_nolog (int id, name char (40)) nologging
  2.
  
  Table created.
  
  Elapsed time: 00:00:00.00
  SQL > insert into test_log select ROWNUM *-1, DBMS_RANDOM. String('A',1) FROM DUAL CONNECT BY LEVEL < = 1000000
  2.
  
  1000000 rows created.
  
  Elapsed time: 00:00:13.46
  SQL > insert into test_nolog select ROWNUM *-1, DBMS_RANDOM. String('A',1) FROM DUAL CONNECT BY LEVEL < = 1000000
  2.
  
  1000000 rows created.
  
  Elapsed time: 00:00:16.95
  SQL > update test_log set id = 100
  2.
  
  1000000 lines to date.
  
  Elapsed time: 00:00:46.35
  SQL > update test_nolog set id = 100
  2.
  
  1000000 lines to date.
  
  Elapsed time: 00:00:49.43

  Insert and update have no impact if the tables are created with the NOLOGGING clause or logging

  It generates the same amount of redo for insert and UPDATE stmts stmts

  NOLOGGING can help for the following things

  1 CTAS
  2.SQL * loader in direct mode
  3. INSERT / * + APPEND * /...

  SYSTEM@rman 15/12/2008> truncate table  test_log;
  
  Table truncated.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:01.49
  SYSTEM@rman 15/12/2008> truncate table test_nolog;
  
  Table truncated.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.67
  SYSTEM@rman 15/12/2008> insert into test_nolog select ROWNUM*-1,DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',1) FROM DUAL CONNECT BY LEVEL <=1000000;
  
  1000000 rows created.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:39.80
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 1731520519
  
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation                     | Name | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | INSERT STATEMENT              |      |     1 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |   1 |  COUNT                        |      |       |            |          |
  |*  2 |   CONNECT BY WITHOUT FILTERING|      |       |            |          |
  |   3 |    FAST DUAL                  |      |     1 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
  ---------------------------------------------------
  
     2 - filter(LEVEL<=1000000)
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
         3081  recursive calls
        41111  db block gets
         8182  consistent gets
            0  physical reads
     60983504  _redo size_
          674  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
          638  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
            3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
            2  sorts (memory)
            0  sorts (disk)
      1000000  rows processed
  
  SYSTEM@rman 15/12/2008> commit;
  
  Commit complete.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
  SYSTEM@rman 15/12/2008> insert into test_log select ROWNUM*-1,DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',1) FROM DUAL CONNECT BY LEVEL <=1000000;
  
  1000000 rows created.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:38.79
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 1731520519
  
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation                     | Name | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | INSERT STATEMENT              |      |     1 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |   1 |  COUNT                        |      |       |            |          |
  |*  2 |   CONNECT BY WITHOUT FILTERING|      |       |            |          |
  |   3 |    FAST DUAL                  |      |     1 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
  ---------------------------------------------------
  
     2 - filter(LEVEL<=1000000)
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
         3213  recursive calls
        41323  db block gets
         8261  consistent gets
            2  physical reads
     60993120  _redo_ size
          674  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
          636  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
            3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
            2  sorts (memory)
            0  sorts (disk)
      1000000  rows processed
  
  SYSTEM@rman 15/12/2008> commit;
  

  They simply generate the same anount of redo

  If you use hint APPEND, you can reduce the timings of INSERT stmt

  SYSTEM@rman 15/12/2008> truncate table test_nolog;
  
  Table truncated.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.28
  SYSTEM@rman 15/12/2008> INSERT /*+ APPEND */ into test_nolog select ROWNUM*-1,DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',1) FROM DUAL CONNECT BY LEVEL <=100
  
  1000000 rows created.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:28.19
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  ERROR:
  ORA-12838: cannot read/modify an object after modifying it in parallel
  
  SP2-0612: Error generating AUTOTRACE EXPLAIN report
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
         3125  recursive calls
         8198  db block gets
          929  consistent gets
            0  physical reads
       161400  redo size
          660  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
          652  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
            3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
            2  sorts (memory)
            0  sorts (disk)
      1000000  rows processed
  
  SYSTEM@rman 15/12/2008> 
  

  You can also view time significant difference/redo generated between INSERT and INSERT with append on a table NOLOGGING

• Cannot use the command clause contained in the posting online of a cursor

  Dear people,
  I use Oracle 10 g with forms 6i. I had a requirement where I gotto choose the latest ten records and view the sorting in the opposite order.say for ex.
  

  Cursor C is select * from (select ename,sal from emp order by sal desc) where rownum<=10;

  But my problem is all the time that I came to know that we cannot use the order by clause in the view of a cursor line in forms 6i. Think it's one of the limitations of forms 6i.so u can suggest me what I can do to get the expected results? do we not have any alternative?
  
  
  Thanking you,
  
  
  Concerning
  Vids
  
  Published by: vidusnat on July 4, 2012 03:38

  Hello
  Please specify!
  Forms 6i must be with an older version of SQL and PL/SQL (8.x).

  To keep it simple create a VIEW in the comics with your as its source and the use of the VIEW in the form. As you noted, it works in 10g and exploit it.

  See you soon,.

• try to get the SUM of all of the charges with the having clause

  Hi Oracle users.

  I'm trying to accomplish to get a sum of a series of charges and it should be easy, but I can't get it.

  For example, I have the following.

  Select ACCTLOC,  count(ACCTLOC) AS TOTALP
  FROM BOX_ACCTS_TBL 
   WHERE TIME_REQ > SYSDATE-120
   Group By ACCTLOC
    having (count(ACCTLOC) > 1)
   
   the results are
   
  ACCTLOC   TOTALP
   
  Philly     15970
  NY          8623
  Tacoma        3
  SanFran     195
  Hartford    5
  Miami       4374
  
    
  

  How can I get the SUM of this group? Do I put this in PL SQL and do a procedure to carry out the selection? Is this the way to go on this?
  I appreciate all the comments you can give.

  Thank you!

  with

  query_result as

  (select 'Philly' acctloc, 15970 totalp Union double all the)

  Select "NY", 8623 Union double all the

  Select "Tacoma", 3 double Union all

  Select "SanFran", 195 double Union all

  Select "Hartford", 5 Union double all the

  Select 'Miami', double 4374

  )

  Select acctloc, totalp, sum (totalp) on the_sum, avg (totalp) (on the_avg), ratio_to_report (totalp) (percentages))

  of query_result

  ACCTLOC	TOTALP	THE_SUM	THE_AVG	PERCENTAGES
  Philly	15970	29170	4861.66666666666666666666666666666666667	.547480287967089475488515598217346588961
  NY	8623	29170	4861.66666666666666666666666666666666667	.295611930065135413095646211861501542681
  Tacoma	3	29170	4861.66666666666666666666666666666666667	.000102845389098388755570791909496057593
  SanFran	195	29170	4861.66666666666666666666666666666666667	.006684950291395269112101474117243743572
  Hartford	5	29170	4861.66666666666666666666666666666666667	.000171408981830647925951319849160095989
  Miami	4374	29170	4861.66666666666666666666666666666666667	.149948577305450805622214604045251971203

  Concerning

  Etbin

• HOW TO USE THE CONNECT_BY CLAUSE

  Hi guys... I have a table like this
  
  create table emp_del (ename varchar2 (10), mname varchar2 (10))
  Insert into emp_del values ('ABC', 'MNO')
  Insert into emp_del values ('MNO', 'XYZ')
  Insert into emp_del values ('XYZ', 'king')
  Insert into emp_del values ('king', NULL)
  
  I use this sql to return the name of any employee senior...
  
  SELECT SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (MNAME, '-->') "MANAGER_NAME".
  OF EMP_DEL
  CONNECT PRIOR MNAME = ENAME
  START BY ENAME =: P_EMPLOYEE_NAME
  
  ex: ename = ABC
  released as: - > MNO
  -> MNO-> XYZ
  -> MNO-> XYZ-> King
  -> MNO-> XYZ-> king - >
  
  I just need the output to be-> King
  
  can you guys help me

  One way:

  select ename
  from(
    select e.*,connect_by_isleaf lf
    from emp_del e
    connect by prior mname=ename
    start with ename=:P_EMPLOYEE_NAME
    )
    where lf = 1
  

  Note: it can be simplified as below, just used a subquery to understand...

  select ename
  from emp_del e
  where connect_by_isleaf = 1
  connect by prior mname=ename
  start with ename=:P_EMPLOYEE_NAME
  

• WHERE the listagg clause

  Hello
  I have the sql query:

  select k.id, listagg(a.first_name ||' '|| a.last_name, ', ') within group (order by a.last_name) as Autor 
  from ksiazki k 
  left join autorstwa at on k.id = at.ksi_id 
  left join autorzy a on a.id = at.aut_id 
  group by k.id 

  and this return:

  k_id      listagg 
  1          a_name_1 & a_last_name_1, a_name_2 & a_last_name_2
  2          a_name_3 & a_last_name_3, a_name_4 & a_last_name_4
  3          a_name_3 & a_last_name_3, a_name_2 & a_last_name_2
  4          a_name_3 & a_last_name_3
  5          null

  and I want to add to the query of WHERE clause, for example:

  ...where listagg(...) = 'a_name_1 & a_last_name_1'

  query returns rank 1
  or

  ...where listagg(...) = 'a_name_2 & a_last_name_2'

  query return rows 1 and 3.
  
  My version of oracle:
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  
  Published by: Lucie 2011-06-21 16:22
  
  Published by: Lucie 2011-06-21 16:23

  Use the HAVING clause:

  select k.id, listagg(a.first_name ||' '|| a.last_name, ', ') within group (order by a.last_name) as Autor
  from ksiazki k
  left join autorstwa at on k.id = at.ksi_id
  left join autorzy a on a.id = at.aut_id
  group by k.id
  having listagg(a.first_name ||' '|| a.last_name, ', ') within group (order by a.last_name) = 'a_name_1 & a_last_name_1'
  /
  

  SY.

• Use of the place where and having clause

  Hi all
  
  I have always a doubt as to the use of HAVING and WHERE clause.
  Suppose I have table T1 with a single column C1
  
  CREATE TABLE T1
  (C1 VARCHAR2 (1));
  
  who data following INSERT scripts
  
  INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('A');
  INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('B');
  
  INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('C');
  
  INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('A');
  INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('B');
  
  INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('A');
  
  
  Now I want the result as follows
  
  
  
  C1 = COUNT (C1)
  ==============
  B = 2
  A = 3
  
  Then out of query 1 and 2, approach who is right?
  
  (1) SELECT C1, COUNT (C1) FROM T1
  WHERE C1 <>'C '.
  GROUP BY C1
  ORDER BY C1 DESC;
  
  (2) SELECT C1, COUNT (C1) FROM T1
  GROUP BY C1
  SEEN C1 <>'C '.
  ORDER BY C1 DESC;
  
  Published by: user13306874 on June 21, 2010 02:36

  In SQL, it is always better to filter data as soon as possible of the moment.
  In your example, the WHERE clause would be right now:

  SQL> explain plan for
    2  select c1,count(c1)
    3  from t1
    4  where c1 != 'C'
    5  group by c1
    6* order by c1 desc;
  
  Explained.
  
  SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
  
  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  ----------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 3946799371
  
  ----------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation          | Name | Rows  | Bytes |
  ----------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     5 |    10 |
  |   1 |  SORT GROUP BY     |      |     5 |    10 |
  |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |     5 |    10 |
  ----------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
     2 - filter("C1"!='C')
  
  18 rows selected.
  
  SQL>
  

  As you can see that the filter is applied during the analysis of T1.

  Whereas in the case of HAVING:

  SQL> explain plan for
    2  select c1,count(c1)
    3  from t1
    4  group by c1
    5  having c1 != 'C'
    6* order by c1 desc;
  
  Explained.
  
  SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
  
  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  ----------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 3146800528
  
  ----------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation           | Name | Rows  | Bytes |
  ----------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |      |     6 |    12 |
  |*  1 |  FILTER             |      |       |       |
  |   2 |   SORT GROUP BY     |      |     6 |    12 |
  |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |     6 |    12 |
  ----------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
     1 - filter("C1"!='C')
  
  18 rows selected.
  
  SQL>
  

  The analysis is performed after all groups have been calculated: which was calculated in vain, because it will be further filtered because of the HAVING clause.

  In general, I would like to use as a guide: If you do not use aggregate functions in your predicate in the HAVING clause, set this predicate to the WHERE of your query part.

  Published by: Toon Koppelaars June 21, 2010 11:54

• PL/SQL parameter in fusion by using the clause

  Hi all

  I need to create a procedure where I use the Merge clause. However, by using the condition, I have to put value user_define (V_LOCALE_CD). This value checks table of locale and then to make a match with table of flex_labels_test.

  There is no specific requirement and I don't have the test data.

  My only question how do I use user set the value using the condition. Here is the procedure I created as follows.

  create or replace the PROCEDURE UPSERT_FLEX_LABEL_3 (V_LOCALE_CD IN VARCHAR2,

  V_VALUE IN VARCHAR2,

  V_FIELDVALUE IN VARCHAR2,

  V_FIELDNAME IN VARCHAR2,

  V_TABLENAME IN VARCHAR2,

  N_FLEX_TYPE NUMBER,

  V_COLOR IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL,

  N_IMAGE_LIBRARY_ID IN THE NUMBER DEFAULT NULL,

  N_HIERARCHY_ID IN DEFAULT NUMBER 5237260000000000001,

  N_IS_INHERITED IN THE DEFAULT NUMBER 1)

  AS

  L_COUNT NUMBER;

  NUMBER OF N_LOCALE_ID;

  NUMBER OF NN_HIERARCHY_ID: = 5237260000000000001;

  NUMBER OF NN_IS_INHERITED: = 1;

  NUMBER OF INSERTCOUNT;

  UPDATECOUNT NUMBER;

  NUMBER OF ERR_CODE;

  ERR_MSG VARCHAR2 (100);

  BEGIN

  -SELECT ID IN N_LOCALE_ID OF PLACES WHERE LOCALE_CD = V_LOCALE_CD;

  / * IT WILL CHECK DUPLICATES, IF THEY ARE PRESENT, THEN IT WILL UPDATE RECORD ELSE IT WILL INSERT A NEW RECORD * /.

  BEGIN

  Merge into fl flex_labels_test

  using (select locale id where locale_cd = V_LOCALE_CD) L

  on (l.id = fl.locale_id)

  When matched then

  GAME UPDATE

  HIERARCHY_ID = NVL (N_HIERARCHY_ID, NN_HIERARCHY_ID),

  IS_INHERITED = NVL (N_IS_INHERITED, NN_IS_INHERITED),

  FLEX_TYPE = N_FLEX_TYPE,

  VALUE = V_VALUE,

  IMAGE_LIBRARY_ID = N_IMAGE_LIBRARY_ID,

  COLOR = V_COLOR

  WHERE TABLENAME = V_TABLENAME

  AND FIELDNAME = V_FIELDNAME

  AND FIELDVALUE = V_FIELDVALUE

  When not matched then

  INSERT (HIERARCHY_ID, ID_PARAMETRES_REGIONAUX, IS_INHERITED, FLEX_TYPE, TABLENAME, FIELDNAME, FIELDVALUE, VALUE, IMAGE_LIBRARY_ID, COLOR)

  VALUES (NVL (N_HIERARCHY_ID, NN_HIERARCHY_ID), N_LOCALE_ID, NVL (N_IS_INHERITED, NN_IS_INHERITED), N_FLEX_TYPE, V_TABLENAME, V_FIELDNAME, V_FIELDVALUE, V_VALUE, N_IMAGE_LIBRARY_ID, V_COLOR);

  UPDATECOUNT: = NUMBER OF ROWS SQL %;

  EXCEPTION

  WHILE OTHERS THEN

  ERR_CODE: = SQLCODE;

  ERR_MSG: = SUBSTR (SQLERRM, 1, 200);

  DBMS_OUTPUT. PUT_LINE ("ERRORS" |) ERR_CODE | ' AND ' | ERR_MSG);

  END;

  COMMIT;

  DBMS_OUTPUT. PUT_LINE ('RECORD INSERTCOUNT =' |) NVL(INSERTCOUNT,0));

  DBMS_OUTPUT. PUT_LINE (' UPDATECOUNT RECORD ='|) NVL(UPDATECOUNT,0));

  EXCEPTION

  WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN

  RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR (-20001, "ID NOT FOUND REGIONAL SETTINGS");

  END;

  I guess that's what I was looking for. Thank you guys for your efforts.

  FUSION using parameter variables

• Not able to connect after changing the password using the VALUES ALTER clause

  Hello
  
  John explained earlier the clause VALUES below thread.
  
  Status expired
  
  I created a new account named SURI, and tried to use the password of the user account from the HR by using the VALUES clause. I was able to change the password but not able to connect SURI with HR password.
  
  Please see below for details. And the SQL statements that I have tried.
  

  SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Mon Aug 13 18:44:50 2012
  
  Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
  
  Enter user-name: sys as sysdba
  Enter password:
  
  Connected to:
  Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
  
  SQL> SELECT password
    2  FROM dba_users
    3  WHERE username = 'HR';
  
  PASSWORD
  ------------------------------
  4C6D73C3E8B0F0DA
  
  SQL> ALTER USER SURI IDENTIFIED BY VALUES '4C6D73C3E8B0F0DA';
  
  User altered.
  
  SQL> SELECT password
    2  FROM dba_users
    3  WHERE username='SURI';
  
  PASSWORD
  ------------------------------
  4C6D73C3E8B0F0DA
  
  SQL> conn suri/hr     -- HR account's password is hr only
  ERROR:
  ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
  
  
  Warning: You are no longer connected to ORACLE.
  
  SQL>

  Thank you
  Suri

  Its because you have used a different username.
  Oracle produces a hash based on the user name and the password, not only the password.

  Therefore, you can not use the hashed password of a user to log on to the account of another user.

  You need to get the password hashed Suri and then connect you to suri by using the password hashed Suri (using the identified by the syntax of values)

• How to use the "Order by" clause dynamically on values LOV Forms 10g r2

  Hello
  
  I have following requirement, please guide me.
  
  1. create a list of values with 2 fields, Code and Description
  
  2. do not use the command clause contained in the registration request Group
  
  3. fix this LOV on a form field
  
  4. when the user calls the user LOV will see two fields in LOV with header as Code and Description
  
  5. when the user clicks the column header "Code" then LOV should be arranged on Code
  
  6 and if the user clicks on the header of the column "Description" then LOV must be sorted on the Description
  
  
  Thanks in advance.

  Please post this problem in this forum->

  [Formulas Forum | http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=82]

  And close this thread by he scored as replied. ;)

  Kind regards.

  LOULOU.

• Can I use the following script should set up rman DB only or non-rman configured DB

  Hello

  I need your help this following script

  recover database using backup controlfile until Cancel;

  I can only used in configured RMAN DB.

  (or)

  Can we used above usual script on database (IE. RMAN not configured the database)

  Please suggest me. Thanks in advance.

  If you use RMAN to create backup BackupSet, you use RMAN to RESTORE the database.

  Subsequently, you can use RMAN or SQLPLUS to issue the command to RECOVER the DATABASE.

  (RMAN has no clause 'using backup controlfile' because it identifies the controlfile as a backup, while sqlplus must use the following clause if the controlfile is a backup)

  Hemant K Collette

• Database parameter determines the parallel clause?

  Hi all

  I come with a request that we can use the parallel clause in several ddl, dml statements etc, but where I got stucked was, what parameter in the database that controls or defines the parallel clause.

  For example,.

  What is the maximum that we can use for parallel.

  Please help me in this

  Search PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS

  This is the max in all concurrent sessions.  If you are looking for a session limit, you will need to see if the resource manager is configured.

  Hemant K Collette