VPN between cisco unified customer 3.6.3 and Pix 501 6.2 (1) with the MS CA server

Hello

I have Microsoft CA server with the latest support CEP and pix 501 that gets the digital certificate. I also have the client certificate of Cisco, but VPN doesn't work

In the IPSec Log Viewer, I constantly "CM_IKE_ESTABLISH_FAIL."

It worked well prior to Win2k server has been completely updated with the latest patches.

The pix configuration is identical to that of article http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/configipsecsmart.html

I reinstall the stand-alone CA and support CEP server but not had any luck.

What could be wrong?

It looks like IKE implementation problem. Make DH group 2 policy ISAKMP.

Visit this link:

http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_v53/IPSec/exvpncl.htm

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

VPN between Cisco and Check Point problem

Guys,

I have problems to establish a vpn site-to-site between a Cisco 3660 e router tunnel a firewall checkpoint NG AI R55.

In the SiteA is an environment with a Cisco 3660 router using the following configurations:

crypto ISAKMP policy 1

md5 hash

preshared authentication

Group 2

life 86400

!

ISAKMP crypto key [removed] address 172.17.10.111

!

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac serasa

!

Serasa 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

defined by peer 172.17.10.111

Set transform-set serasa

match address 101

!

interface Serial5/4

bandwidth 64

IP 192.168.163.6 255.255.255.252

no ip unreachable

No cdp enable

card crypto serasa

!

IP route 10.12.0.155 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

IP route 172.17.10.111 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

IP route 172.17.10.155 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

!

access-list 101 permit tcp 172.248.7.200 host 10.12.0.0 0.0.255.255 eq 3315

In the SiteB, we have an environment highly available Nokia using VRRP.

The IP address configured as a cluster in the Control Point is 172.17.10.111.

We have already confirmed all the configurations of the phase 1 and 2 and is OK, but the VPN is not established.

The following messages appear in the router and the firewall:

ROUTER

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): check IPSec 1 proposal

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: turn 1 ESP_DES

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: attributes of transformation:

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: program is 1

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: life of HIS (basic) 3600

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: type of life in kilobytes

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: service life of SA (IPV) 0x0 0 x 46 0 50 x 0 x 0

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: authenticator is HMAC-MD5

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): atts are acceptable.

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 of the proposal

(Eng. msg key.) Local INCOMING = 192.168.163.6, distance = 172.17.10.111,.

local_proxy = 172.248.7.200/255.255.255.255/0/0 (type = 1),

remote_proxy = 10.12.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - esp-md5-hmac.

lifedur = 0 and 0kb in

SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 2

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (kei_proxy): head = serasa, card-> ivrf =, kei-> ivrf =

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (validate_transform_proposal): proxy unsupported identities

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): IPSec policy invalidated proposal

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): politics of ITS phase 2 is not acceptable! (local 192.168.163.6 remote 172.17.10.111)

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: node set 2114856837 to QM_IDLE

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): lot of 200.245.207.111 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): purge the node 2114856837

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): unknown entry for node-528822595: State = IKE_QM_I_QM1, large = 0x00000001, minor = 0x0000000C

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_MODE_FAILURE: fast processing mode failed with the peer to 172.17.10.111

FIREWALL

IKE: Main Mode has received Notification of peers: first Contact

IKE: Completion of Main Mode.

IKE: Quick Mode has received Notification of the counterpart: no proposal chosen

IKE: Quick Mode has received Notification of the counterpart: no proposal chosen

IKE: Exchanging information received remove peer IKE - SA:

Anyone have idea who might be the problem?

Thank you very much for the help.

Fabiano Mendonca.

Cool. pls mark as resolved if that might help others... the rate of responses if deemed useful...

REDA

Site to Site VPN between Cisco ASA 5505 and Sonicwall TZ170

I'm trying to implement a VPN site-to site between our data center and office. The data center has a Cisco ASA 5505 and the Office has a Sonicwall TZ170. I managed to configure the two so that the vpn connects. Each of the firewall I ping the IP Address of the internet firewall on the other side and a desktop computer I can ping the IP Address of the firewall internal datacenter but I can't carry traffic between private subnets datacenter and desktop. Can anyone help?

The config below has had IPs/passwords has changed.

External Datacenter: 1.1.1.4

External office: 1.1.1.1

Internal data center: 10.5.0.1/24

Internal office: 10.10.0.1/24

: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.2 (1)
!
hostname datacenterfirewall
mydomain.tld domain name
activate the password encrypted
passwd encrypted
names of
name 10.10.0.0 OfficeNetwork
10.5.0.0 DatacenterNetwork name
!
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
10.5.0.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
1.1.1.4 IP address 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/1
!
interface Ethernet0/2
!
interface Ethernet0/3
!
interface Ethernet0/4
!
interface Ethernet0/5
!
interface Ethernet0/6
!
interface Ethernet0/7
!
passive FTP mode
clock timezone IS - 5
clock to summer time EDT recurring
DNS server-group DefaultDNS
buydomains.com domain name
permit same-security-traffic inter-interface
permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
inside_access_in list extended access permit icmp any one
inside_access_in list extended access permitted tcp a whole
inside_access_in list extended access udp allowed a whole
inside_access_in of access allowed any ip an extended list
outside_access_in list extended access permit icmp any one
outside_access_in list extended access udp allowed any any eq isakmp
IP DatacenterNetwork 255.255.255.0 OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list extended pixtosw
pixtosw list extended access allow icmp DatacenterNetwork 255.255.255.0 OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0
IP OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 DatacenterNetwork 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list extended pixtosw
pixtosw list extended access allow icmp OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 DatacenterNetwork 255.255.255.0
outside_cryptomap_66.1 list of allowed ip extended access all OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0
outside_cryptomap_66.1 ip OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 allowed extended access list all
outside_cryptomap_66.1 list extended access permit icmp any OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0
outside_cryptomap_66.1 list extended access allowed icmp OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 everything
pager lines 24
Enable logging
asdm of logging of information
Within 1500 MTU
Outside 1500 MTU
IP verify reverse path to the outside interface
ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
ASDM image disk0: / asdm - 623.bin
don't allow no asdm history
ARP timeout 14400
NAT-control
Global 1 interface (outside)
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
inside_access_in access to the interface inside group
Access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
Route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1 1
Route OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 outside 1.1.1.1 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
Enable http server
http 10.5.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA 256 - aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5-esp - aes esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes-256 walthamoffice, esp-sha-hmac
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
Crypto dynamic-map ciscopix 1 corresponds to the address outside_cryptomap_66.1
Crypto dynamic-map ciscopix 1 transform-set walthamoffice
Crypto dynamic-map ciscopix 1 the value reverse-road
map dynmaptosw 66-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic ciscopix
dynmaptosw interface card crypto outside
crypto isakmp identity address
crypto ISAKMP allow outside
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
preshared authentication
3des encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 86400
crypto ISAKMP policy 13
preshared authentication
aes-256 encryption
sha hash
Group 2
lifetime 28800
crypto ISAKMP policy 30
preshared authentication
aes-256 encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 86400
No encryption isakmp nat-traversal
Telnet 10.5.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 5
SSH 10.5.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
management-access inside
dhcpd address 10.5.0.2 - 10.5.0.254 inside
dhcpd allow inside
!

a basic threat threat detection
Statistics-list of access threat detection
no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
NTP server 66.250.45.2 source outdoors
NTP server 72.18.205.157 source outdoors
NTP server 208.53.158.34 source outdoors
WebVPN
attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
VPN-idle-timeout no
username admin password encrypted
tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *.
!
!
!
type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum 512
!
context of prompt hostname
Cryptochecksum:7f319172e5de9c0e550804a263f8e49e
: end

Mattew, obvious lack of education is the rule exempt from nat for your tunnel, your access list pixtosw is similar on this example, I assume that you have gone through this link, if it does not see the configs on both sides.

Add the statement of rule sheep in asa and try again.

NAT (inside) 0-list of access pixtosw

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008052c9d4.shtml

Concerning

IPSec VPN between Cisco and ScreenOS

Hello

I'm trying to set up a simple IPSec VPN between a Cisco 2911 router and a Juniper Netscreen ScreenOS (not exactly now the model) device. Initially the debbuging seems good (QM_IDLE), but the ISAKMP Security Association is deleted.

The guy managing the Juniper device send me an extract from his diary:

###########################################################################

2012-08-28 10:24:16 info 00536 IKE Phase 2 msg ID System

9b 839579: negotiations failed.

2012-08-28 10:24:16 info system 00536 rejected a package of IKE loopback.11

of : 500 to

217.150.152.45:500 with cookies

87960e39d074ca49 and 9302d26c7ce324a5

because there is no acceptable Phase

2 proposals...

It has defined the following phase 2 proposals:

IKE the value p2-proposal "G2_esp_aes256_sha_1800s" group2 esp aes256-sha-1, 1800 second

###########################################################################

And I use these:

###########################################################################

crypto ISAKMP policy 1

BA aes 256

preshared authentication

Group 2

!

ISAKMP crypto key address 217.150.152.45

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

card crypto ipsec vpn 2 isakmp

Description * VPN Anbindung nach PKI in Magdeburg *.

defined by peer 217.150.152.45

define security-association life seconds 1800

the value of the transform-set esp - aes

match address PKI-TRAFFIC

!

###########################################################################

Here is my Log:

#################################################################################################################

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): profile of THE request is (NULL)

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 217.150.152.45, peer port 500

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: new position created post = 0x2A2D7150 peer_handle = 0x8000003A

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x2A2D7150, refcount 1 to peer isakmp_initiator

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): insert his with his 31627E04 = success

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): cannot start aggressive mode, try the main mode.

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-07 ID NAT - t

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-03 ID

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-02 ID NAT - t

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_MM1

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): Beginner Main Mode Exchange

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP (0): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM1 = IKE_I_MM2

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): treatment ITS payload. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 239

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key local found

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: analysis of the profiles for xauth...

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 1 against the policy of priority 1

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: SHA hash

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: group by default 2

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: keylength 256

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 1 0 x 51 0x80

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): atts are acceptable. Next payload is 0

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): Acceptable atts: real life: 0

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): Acceptable atts:life: 0

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): fill atts in his vpi_length:4

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): fill atts in his life_in_seconds:86400

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): return real life: 86400

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): timer life Started: 86400.

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 239

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM2 = IKE_I_MM2

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.452: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.452: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM2 = IKE_I_MM3

28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP (0): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP

28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM3 = IKE_I_MM4

28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): processing KE payload. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (0): processing NONCE payload. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM4 = IKE_I_MM4

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): send initial contact

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): ITS been pre-shared key, using id ID_IPV4_ADDR type authentication

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP (1049): payload ID

next payload: 8

type: 1

address: 92.67.80.237

Protocol: 17

Port: 500

Length: 12

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): the total payload length: 12

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM4 = IKE_I_MM5

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP (1049): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): payload ID for treatment. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP (1049): payload ID

next payload: 8

type: 1

address: 217.150.152.45

Protocol: 17

Port: 500

Length: 12

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (0): peer games * no * profiles

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): SA authentication status:

authenticated

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): SA has been authenticated with 217.150.152.45

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: try inserting a peer /217.150.152.45/500/ and inserted 2A2D7150 successfully.

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM5 = IKE_I_MM6

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM6 = IKE_I_MM6

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM6 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): start Quick Mode Exchange, M - ID of 1582159006

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): initiator QM gets spi

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): entrance, node-1582159006 = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_INIT_QM

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_QM_READY = IKE_QM_I_QM1

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP (1049): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: node set-452721455 to QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): HASH payload processing. Message ID =-452721455

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): treatment protocol NOTIFIER PROPOSAL_NOT_CHOSEN 1

SPI 0, message ID =-452721455, his 0x31627E04 =

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): remove the reason for HIS "fatal Recevied of information' State (I) QM_IDLE (post 217.150.152.45)

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): node-452721455 error suppression FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: node set 494253780 to QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): purge the node 494253780

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_DEST_SA

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): remove the reason for HIS "fatal Recevied of information' State (I) QM_IDLE (post 217.150.152.45)

Intertoys_Zentrale_Waddinxveen_01 #.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: Unlocking counterpart struct 0x2A2D7150 for isadb_mark_sa_deleted(), count 0

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for 217.150.152.45: 2A2D7150

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): node-1582159006 error suppression FALSE reason 'IKE deleted.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_DEST_SA = IKE_DEST_SA

#################################################################################################################

Is there something special that needs to be addressed when creating a VPN for Juniper devices?

Greetings

Thomas

The peer IPSec a PFS enabled, do the same in your crypto-map:

card crypto ipsec vpn 2 isakmp

PFS group2 Set

--
Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

IPSec VPN between Cisco ASA and Fortigate1000

Hello

I find a useful document on how to create a tunnel VPN IPSec with ASA 5510 firewall Fortigate 1000...

the configuration of the coast FG is done without any problem, BUT the document (. doc FG) said I must configure the ASA with a GRE interface and assign an internal IP address in order to communicate with the FG...

The question is: How do I configure the interface on the SAA ACCORD?

Thanks in advance, Experts...

Kind regards...

ASA firewall does not support the interface/GRE GRE tunnel.

If you need to have GRE configured, you will need to complete the GRE tunnel on router IOS.

If you want to configure just pure tunnel VPN IPSec (lan-to-lan), here is an example of configuration on the side of the ASA:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080950890.shtml

Hope that helps.

Configure several IPSec VPN between Cisco routers

I would like to create multiple ipsec VPN between 3 routers. Before applying it, I would like to check on the config I wrote to see if it works. It's just on RouterA configuration for virtual private networks to RouterB, and RouterC.

As you can apply in a cyptomap by interface, I say with the roadmap, that it should be able to manage traffic for both routers. Or is there a better way to do it?

RouterA - 1.1.1.1

RouterB - 2.2.2.2

RouterC - 3.3.3.3

RouterA

crypto ISAKMP policy 10

BA 3des

preshared authentication

Group 2

ISAKMP crypto key RouterB address 2.2.2.2

ISAKMP crypto keys RouterC address 3.3.3.3

invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP

ISAKMP crypto keepalive 5 10 periodicals

ISAKMP crypto nat keepalive 30

!

life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

!

Crypto ipsec transform-set AES - SHA esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

!

outsidemap 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

defined peer 2.2.2.2

game of transformation-AES-SHA

match address 222

outsidemap 30 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

defined peer 3.3.3.3

game of transformation-AES-SHA

match address 333

!

interface GigabitEthernet0/0

Description * Internet *.

NAT outside IP

outsidemap card crypto

!

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

Description * LAN *.

IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0

IP nat inside

!

IP nat inside source map route RouterA interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload

!

access-list 222 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 223 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 223 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

access-list 333 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 334 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 334 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

!

!

RouterA route map permit 10

corresponds to the IP 223 334

Hi Chris,

The two will remain active.

The configuration you have is for several ste VPN site is not for the redundant VPN.

The config for the redundant VPN is completely different allows so don't confuse is not with it.

In the redundant VPN configuration both peers are defined in the same card encryption.

Traffic that should be passed through the tunnel still depend on the access list, we call in the card encryption.

This access-lsist is firstly cheked and as a result, the traffic is passed through the correct tunnel

HTH!

Concerning

Regnier

Please note all useful posts

VPN site to site Pix 525 ver7.2 (2) and Pix 501 ver 6.3

Hello!!

I have problems to establish a vpn between two pix.

The first pix 525 a version 7.2 (2) an another Pix version 6.3 has this it is not run by myself.

The fixed phase 1 but send the associated messages

can help me

Thank you

I'm glad you got it working now :)

Please evaluate the useful messages.

Concerning

Farrukh

L2l IPSec VPN 3000 and PIX 501

Hello

I have a remote site that has a broadband internet connection and uses a PIX 501. We wanted to connect them with our main office using our VPN 3000 via VPN site-to-site.

I followed the following documentation:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00800949d2.shtml#tshoot

However the L2L session does not appear on the hub when I check the active sessions.

The network diagram, as well as the PIX config and the screenshots of the VPN configuration for the IPSec-L2L tunnel is attached.

Any help or advice are appreciated.

I just noticed that the PIX firewall, the phase 1 paramateres are not configured. You must configure the same PASE 1 and phase 2 settings on both ends of the tunnel.

For example, on CVPN 3000, you have configured settings Phase 1 as 3DES, pre-shared key etc... We have the same configuration on the PIX firewall too.

Here is an example of sample config

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00800949d2.shtml

I hope this helps!

can I create custom context menus? Can I use Push technology? With the browser?

Anyone know if I can create custom context menus? Also, can I use Push technology? I vibrate the device? With the browser?

Just try to clarify to make sure I understood the question. The browser does not support the menu adding items to the BlackBerry menu (I don't know how tell - the menu that is displayed when you press the menu key on the BlackBerry). Java applications are. You could build something in JavaScript (on 4.6 and later) who gave you menus, but it does not fire when the menu button has been pushed.

Problems with VPN between Cisco PIX 6.3.3 and VPN 3000 Concentrator

Hi guys,.

I hope this is the right place and that someone has encountered this before I don't have much hair left to offset - I'm trying to set up a tunnel between our Pix 6.3.3 performer and a customer using a VPN3000.

The customer wants us to be able to do checkups on a device without allowing anything to of our range of addresses network side private, just one public IP address. We currently run a VPN to our recovery site to allow off-site replication, but the ACL on the other end of this VPN * does * allow the configuration that we had for our private network side, so traffic was not useful at that. Here is a screenshot of what I tried:

ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
nameif ethernet2 dmz1 security50

name 172.16.1.48 Cust_DVR1

permit 192.168.1.0 ip access list inside_outbound_nat0_acl 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.255 Cust_DVR1

permit 192.168.1.0 ip access list outside_cryptomap_30 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.255 Cust_DVR1

IP outside X.Y.Z.227 255.255.255.224
IP address inside 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

location of PDM Cust_DVR1 255.255.255.255 outside

Global 1 X.Y.Z.230 (outside)
Global (dmz1) 1 interface
NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl
NAT (inside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 0 0

Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

outside_map 30 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

outside_map 30 peer A.B.C.D crypto card game<--- (public="" ip="" of="" customer="">

card crypto outside_map 30 match address centura_map_30

card crypto outside_map 30 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value

outside_map interface card crypto outside

ISAKMP key * A.B.C.D netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth No. config-mode

part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 30

ISAKMP policy 30 3des encryption

ISAKMP policy 30 md5 hash

30 2 ISAKMP policy group

ISAKMP duration strategy of life 30 86400

My hope is that anything on the 192.168.1.0/24 would be able to get out of the external interface as our only our public IP addresses (i.e. X.Y.Z.230), but the traffic they see on the other end is coming from the 192.168.1.0 network. I tried to remove the line inside_outbound_nat0_acl think she would use then the world but still do not have a bit of luck and the only difference I see on Kiwi Syslogd is that the src_proxy changes to 0.0.0.0 where is shows the IP address of my private side (for the purposes of the config above let's call it 192.168.1.135).

THANKS MUCH FOR ANY HELP!

-Mario

Hello

For example, you can NAT your internal via the tunnel network traffic when you go to this customer.

In this way, they will see your unique internal network as an IP address.

Let's say, rather than them seeing your internal 192.168.1.0/24, eelle will see your traffic like X.Y.Z.227

Is this what you need?

Federico.

Customer Web couldn't connect to VMware Lookup Service error with the old server DNS name

Hello
I had a Vcenter server named virtualcenter.domain.com (192.168.1.10) with Vcenter 5.1 (with SSO, inventory, Webclient) on a windows 2008 R2 with a MSSQL2012 db.
I tried to upgrade from 5.1 to 5.5u1 and he failed, Vcenter & Webclient installers have been crashing before you finish update
So I decided to make a clone of my Vcenter and still have my production work while trying to update.
My clone has been virtualcenter2.domain.com with a new IP 192.168.1.12
I uninstalled everything for the webclient service that I had to clean files and registry entries manually, because he didn't find the uninstall program when I was clicking on uninstall.
Then the installation went well, everything except the webclient service works very well
When you try to connect to the new vcenter: https://virtualcenter2.domain.com:9443 / vsphere client / I got:
Unable to connect to the VMware Research Service https://VirtualCenter.domain.com:7444/lookupservice/sdk -The SSL certificate verification failed.
Why the error message is wearing the old DNS name?
And why when installing, the webclient service to connect to the search service perfectly and then it doesn't work?

After 1 day, uninstall/reinstall/install, try SSL things and many things, that I found online, the solution is the STUPIDEST thing ever.
WHY DON'T C:\ProgramData\VMware\ls_url.txt USE VMWARE to provide the URL of the LookupService for the Webclient service? During the installation provide you the URL for registration with SSO, why the hell isn't it written that URL somewhere and use it after?

And why the hell with all the gel/reinstalling ALL THE COMPONTENT of the Vcenter, I did, this MUTE txt file has not been updated with the new DNS name of my server?

In any case, my webclient is currently working, but 1 day of work and mental torture do not understand why the hell my client was not working due to a file text fucking, it's depressing.

A customer must Acrobat 9 Pro, to use a form created with the program?

Do you need to have Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro, in order to use and/or view the forms and portfolios created with Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro?
If so, is there a free version I can ask customers to download, so that they are able to use and or view the documents I've created with Acrobat 9 Pro?

With Adobe Reader users can view forms and portfolios.

VPN between 2 routers Cisco 1841 (LAN to LAN)

Hello

I need to connect two offices (two different LAN) using routers cisco 1841 at both ends.

Currently the two cisco router are in working condition and refer the internet LAN clients. (making the NAT).

Can someone please tell us what is the easiest way to set up a VPN between two sites, so that LAN users to an office to access mail servers electronic/request to the office LAN.

I understand that I need IPSec Site to Site VPN (I think).

Anyonce can you please advise.

Kind regards.
```
s.nasheet wrote:
Hi ,
I need to connect two offices ( two different LAN's) together using cisco 1841 routers at both end.
Currently both cisco router are in working order and  acting as a internet gateway to the LAN clients. ( doing NAT).
Can anybody please advise what is the easiest method to configure VPN between two sites so that  LAN users at one office be able to access  the  email/application servers at the other LAN office.
I understand I need IPSec Site to Site VPN  ( i think).
Can anyonce please advise.
Regards.
```
Yes, you need a VPN site-to site. Start with this link which gives a number of examples to set up a VPN S2S between 2 routers Cisco.

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/tech_configuration_examples_list.html#anchor16

Jon

Cisco 3640 to the PIX 501 site 2 site VPN performance specifications.

I intend on creating a site-2-site VPN in Star configuration with a Cisco 3640 as the hub and PIX 501 at the remote sites. My question is around the plug that I read.

.

The specifications for a PIX-501-BUN-K9 tell PIX 501 3DES Bundle (chassis, SW, 10 users, 3DES).

.

A question is what really "10 users. Which is the limit of the number of concurrent sessions, I have on the VPN at a given time, or that it means something else?

.

I also read the specs say that the Maximum number of VPN tunnels that can support a PIX 501 is 5. Because I'm not going to make a tunnel between the PIX 501 at the remote site and the 3640 on the central site, I think I would be OK. Is that correct or is the max value talk the maximum number of concurrent sessions on the tunnel tunnels?

.

Thank you.

UDP traffic always creates a session in the PIX so that the return traffic will be allowed in. The UDP timeout is 2 minutes but IIRC. If you go around NAT with a statement of "nat 0" should not create an xlate I think.

The real time is hard to say really, probably around 2 minutes for a UDP-only user, you would probably make a few 'local sho' orders on the PIX to really see for sure however.

VPN between RV120W and ISA550W

Hi guys,.

Wonder if you can shed some light on my problem until I loose all my hair!

I'm trying to create a VPN between a RV120W at a remote site and our ISA500W in our offices... I can't it connect!

I'll put up an IPsec tunnel between the sites, but it does not want to connect.

Remote site - RV120W

The IKE policy table

Management / time type

Main mode Exchange

3DES encryption

AUTH - SHA-1

DH group 2

Pre-Shared Key AUTH

HIS life 28800

Xauth no

VPN

Type Auto policy

IP of remote endpoint address

Local IP subnet

Remote IP subnet

Auto policy settings

Life 3600 seconds

Encryption algorithm 3DES

SHA-1 integrity algorithm

Key Enable PFS group

DH-group 2 (1024 bits)

Headquarters - ISA550W

IPsec policy

Static IP address of remote Type

AUTH Type pre-shared Key

Local ID (empty)

Remote ID (empty)

IKE

SHA1 hash

Pre-shared Key

D0H group group 2 (1024 bits)

Lifetime 8 hours

Transform

integrity ESP_MD5_HMAC

Encryption ESP_3DES

Errors, I'm getting in the newspapers

Remote RV120W (note! I changed the external IP to protect the innocent!)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: respond to the negotiation of the new phase 2: 69.193.0.0 [0]<=>80.4.0.0 [0]

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: configuration using IPsec SA: 192.168.3.0/24<->192.168.1.0/24

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: setting encmode 3 (3)-> Tunnel peer (1)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: proposal of the peer:

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: (proto_id = spisize ESP = 4 spi = spi_p 8846693d = encmode = 00000000 Tunnel reqid = 0:0)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: (trns_id = 3DES encklen = 0 authtype = hmac-md5)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: Local proposal:

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: (proto_id = spisize ESP = 4 spi = 00000000 spi_p 00000000 encmode = Tunnel reqid = 5:5 =)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: (trns_id = 3DES encklen = 0 authtype = hmac-sha)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: proposal for Phase 2 of 80.4.0.0 [0] does not.

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: no adequate policy not found for 80.4.0.0 [0]

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: sending of information Exchange: Notify payload [NON-PROPOSITION-SELECTED]

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: purged-with proto_id = ISAKMP and spi = c8d68f74af9dfa9a:b4137fd6e0666914 ISAKMP Security Association.

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: accept a request to establish IKE - SA: 80.4.0.0

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 80.4.0.0

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: opening new phase 1 negotiation: 69.193.0.0 [500]<=>80.4.0.0 [500]

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: Start Identity Protection mode.

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:180]: XXX: NUMNATTVENDORIDS: 3

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: definition of vendorid: 4

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: definition of vendorid: 8

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: definition of vendorid: 9

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: RFC 3947

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: for 80.4.0.0 [500], version selected NAT - T: RFC 3947

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: payload NAT - D corresponds to 69.193.0.0 [500]

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for 80.4.0.0 [500]

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: NAT detected: PEER

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: for debugging: change ports2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: change port!

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association established for 69.193.0.0 [4500] - 80.4.0.0 [4500] with spi: 740e6a59f02eca3a:820460c448a5b74b

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: sending of information Exchange: prevent the load [INITIAL CONTACT]

2013-10-29 14:39:31: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: new phase 2 negotiation: 69.193.0.0 [500]<=>80.4.0.0 [0]

2013-10-29 14:39:31: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: setting encryption mode to use UDP encapsulation

2013-10-29 14:39:31: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Unknown notify message from the 80.4.0.0 [4500]. No found handful of phase2.

2013-10-29 14:39:41: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Unknown notify message from the 80.4.0.0 [4500]. No found handful of phase2.

2013-10-29 14:39:51: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Unknown notify message from the 80.4.0.0 [4500]. No found handful of phase2.

2013-10-29 14:40:01: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Unknown notify message from the 80.4.0.0 [4500]. No found handful of phase2.

2013-10-29 14:40:02: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Phase 2 negotiation failed due to upward. c8d68f74af9dfa9a:b4137fd6e0666914:f6cdeead

2013-10-29 14:40:02: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: a calendar of undead has been removed: "quick_i1prep".

Head Office ISA550

2013-10-29 15:25:29 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4765: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:25:29 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4765: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No answer (or no acceptable answer) to our first post IKE. (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:22:38 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4763: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:22:38 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4763: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No answer (or no acceptable answer) to our first post IKE. (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:20:28 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4761: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:20:28 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4761: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No answer (or no acceptable answer) to our first post IKE. (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:20:12 - WARNING - Firewall: type = ACL

If someone could shed some light it would be fantastic!

Configuration items you listed, it's what I see. Transformations do not match between the AIS and the change integrity RV RV MD5 or change the game to transform ISA SHA1. I would recommend changing the ISA in well SHA1As, you don't mention what is IKE ISA policy encryption, but there's 3DES in the RV, so you'll need to ensure its 3DES in ISA. Also note that you are life spans SA do not match. Technically, this should be ok, but it's really best to match as well. The ISA is 8 hours and the RV is 1 hour (3600 seconds)

Shawn Eftink
CCNA/CCDA

Please note all useful messages and mark the correct answers to help others looking for solutions in the community.

VPN between cisco unified customer 3.6.3 and Pix 501 6.2 (1) with the MS CA server

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for