3560 48 PORT POE

MY cisco 3560 48 port does not accept orders for authentication. my version of ios is 12.2 (55) se8

How do I solve this problem

You have activated prior overall command "dot1x system-auth-control"?

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

With the help of 3560 8 port PoE to 1252 dual AP radio for b\g customers

Hello

We have a couple of 3560 8-port switches PoE that we plan to use to put 1252 APs (not yet commissioned). Now given that 3560 switch supports one radio, is possible to order that a pre installed dual radio AP 1252, disable the 5 Ghz one and enable 2,4 Ghz, so b/g clients can access the network until a switch PoE + is purchased?

Any help is appreciated

Thank you

Fix. According to the standard rates of G/A require only a tx/rx, there is no degradation in service.

How do I cure - low power on 2112 port PoE inline?

I have a WLC 2112 with LAP is attached directly to the port PoE 8.

Controller monitor reports:

AP Interface: 0(802.11b) State Down operation: basic Radio MAC: 00: 3A: 99:67:53:50 Cause =Low power online

The tab Advanced Options on the configuration of the AP doesn't show any PoE power state.

How can I use this access point on the controller port?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

WLC is AIR-WLC2112-K9

Version of the product... 6.0.199.4
RTOS Version... 6.0.199.4
Bootloader Version... 4.0.191.0
Version of the Image of emergency... 6.0.199.4

Summary of port
STP Admin physical physical link link
Type of PR Stat Mode Mode status trap POE
-- ------- ---- ------- ---------- ---------- ------ ------- ---------
1 normal Forw Enable Auto 100 complete to enable s/o
DISA normal 2 activate Auto down Enable n/a
3 normal Forw Enable Auto 100 complete to enable s/o
Normal DISA 4 enable Auto down Enable n/a
Normal DISA 5 activate Auto down Enable n/a
DISA normal 6 select Auto down Enable n/a
7 normal Disa Enable Auto down Activate activate (power off)
8 normal Forw Enable Auto 100 Full Up turn on (power on)

Model AP... AIR-LAP1131AG-E-K9

Picture from AP... C1130-K9W8-M

Version of IOS... 12.4 (21 a) JHB1

Hello
```
Set power injector state to 'over-ride' , if we are not able to see this on the AP Advanced.. kindly paste the screenshot here..
Regards

Surendra
```

Connection 2602 to Port PoE-Out of an outdoor AP from 1552 AP

Documentation, I see that it should be possible to connect end devices like for example cameras to the Port PoE Out of an AP from 1552.

Is it also possible to connect another TURN to the port?

Drawing.jpg

In the scenario that precedes the AP 1552 cannot reach the controller. The AP is simply connected in the same VLAN as the WLC via accessport.

When I SSH into the 1552 I see gig1 Port is in place and I receive the 2602 CDP information, unfortunately it seems that the 2602 does not get an IP address via DHCP, or able to communicate trought the 1552 to the network.

How can I fill or assign a vlan to gig1?

I don't think that that is supported to be honest. Some have a PoE switch inline for a connected AP. A test you can do that is simple is to connect a laptop on the port that you had connected 2602 to and see if this laptop gets an ip address. If so, then your Setup is fine and connect directly to a CAPWAP AP on this port might not be supported. Now, if the AP was independent, then it would work. I don't know if you can get a CAPWAP AP to connect via an however MESH access point.

Scott

M4100 - 26G - POE - lack of recurring overload on 17-24 ports

I have a M4100 - 26G - POE that I bought a few weeks ago and I see recurring defects of overload on 17-24 ports only. I used the exact same cables and devices on ports 1-16 and they all work fine, but if I move the cable to one of the top ports this will work for a few minutes then reset due to a defect of overload all few minutes or more. Everything goes well with the cables or connectors, and like I said it works fine on ports 1-16. Ports 1-16 are configured as ports 17-24 in the page web.

I want to know is if anyone else experienced a similar problem. Specifically, I want to know if it's a defective unit, a hardware design flaw, or a problem with the firmware (version for this model). I tend to think, it's probably a defective unit, but I would not be shocked if it is a firmware issue.

I want to know because I won't go well the expense by exchanging the unit to the store or swap try it on warranty and get a replacement that is a refurbished, model unless something is actually wrong with the hardware. I don't know that I see myself using more then 16-port POE in the foreseeable future.

Firmware 10.0.1.27 is now available, and a section in the release notes may relate to this problem:

Cisco 1252 s with regular 802.3af PoE switch - what are the impacts?

Does anyone have an experience of real life to the deployment of the 1252 s on 802.3af regular PoE switches? I have a few 1252 s a certain ports PoE 3560 and issuing upward with alarms 'low power '.

I wonder what the impact of the real world with this scenario. The 1252 s have both 2.4 Ghz and a radio-5, 0 Ghz in them and I have HT enabled on the controller.

I wonder what capabilities I lose by running on 802.3af food in addition to the inconvenience of the alarms.

Thanks in advance!

Hello

This is the command question... the AP 1252 switches POE needs improved Ex-3750-E for all operational radios... If we use only a 802.3af while a single frequency can be enabed and her we can't get a rhythm N... the link below will explain better...

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps6973/ps8382/product_data_sheet0900aecd806b7c5c.html

I would like to know how it works for you!

Concerning

Surendra

SG300 - 28 p: POE power drops every few minutes

Hi all

We have a SG300 - 28 p which, at intervals between 5 and 30 minutes or more, lower power to all its ports POE-powered and then immediately restores power. Switch logs nothing when this happens other than to record that the ports went down and back up, even with debug logging enabled. Non - POE ports are not affected.

When the problem started there were only four POE devices on the switch and we are far under our power budget. (During the test, I added a fifth device, see below.)

Not all combinations of devices cause the drops occur - specifically, it seems that having devices on ports next to each other causing the drops. When the drops occur, absent the increment of POE devices all counters. I noticed this thread earlier here seemed similar:

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/2165089

but in this case, he got no power at all in the adjacent configurations, instead of having to drop all the several minutes.

I am running

SW06 #sh worm

SW version 1.1.2.0 (November 12, 2011 time 23:34:26)

Start the 1.1.0.6 version (date may 11, 2011 time 18:31)

HW version V02

I have the 1.2.2.7.6 ready to go new firmware, I will update this when I get a chance to test it. Unfortunately, it's a switch of production, but it's a with relatively few devices to it so far. If need be, I have a sf300 - 48P I can exchange this sg300 ENJOI trials.

Thank you for anything you might suggest.

Here are the details:

-' Phone' is a phone to IP Avaya 4610SW or 5610SW (class 2)

-"Watchdog" is an environmental monitor IT Watchdogs Watchdog 100 (class 0)

-"WAP" is a Cisco WAP4410N (class 3)

All initially due to lack of combination:

GI10 phone #1

gi22 phone #2

dog guard gi23

WAP gi24

would result in the POE power to place on all ports, every 5 to 30 minutes.

I disabled Green Ethernet completely - no change.

And then made the following tests:

1. "power never inline" on gi23 and gi24: problem disappeared

2. 'inline power auto"on gi23 and gi24: problem is back

3 ' power inline never' on gi23 only: problem disappeared

4 ' auto of inline power' on gi23: problem is back

5 ' power inline never' on gi24 only: problem disappeared

6. "power inline auto" on gi24: problem is back.

I left gi23 powered throughout the night and it was stable: it's about 10 hours without any problem.

This morning, tried the following configs:

08:54 - worked fine

IG4 watchdog

GI10 phone #1

gi22 phone #2

WAP gi24

10:31 - added another phone, the problem came back

IG4 watchdog

GI10 phone #1

gi22 phone #2

gi23 phone #3

WAP gi24

10:43 - inappropriate phone #3 to IG11 (next) - problem continues

IG4 watchdog

GI10 phone #1

IG11 phone #3

gi22 phone #2

WAP gi24

11:00 - moved phone #3 to gi8 - suite problem

IG4 watchdog

gi8 phone #3

GI10 phone #1

gi22 phone #2

WAP gi24

11:31 - moved phone #3 article IG 14 - the problem disappeared

IG4 watchdog

GI10 phone #1

Article IG 14 phone #3

gi22 phone #2

WAP gi24

and that's where we left things now are stable for about four hours.

The following products are the config more later (11:31).

SW06 #show power inline

Power-limit based port mode

Nominal consumed power unit power use threshold traps

---- ------- ------------- ------------------ --------------- ---------

1 of 180 Watts 18 Watts (10%) Disable 95

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

Article IG1 Auto search low class0

IG2 Auto search low class0

IG3 Auto search low class0

IG4 Auto on low class0

IG5 Auto search low class0

GI6 Auto search low class0

gi7 Auto search low class0

gi8 Auto search low class0

gi9 Auto search low class0

GI10 Auto on low 2

IG11 Auto search low class0

gi12 Auto search low class0

ig13 Auto search low class0

IG 14 Auto article on low 2

gi15 Auto search low class0

gi16 research Auto low class0

IG17 Auto search low class0

gi18 Auto search low class0

IG19 Auto search low class0

IG20 Auto search low class0

IG21 Auto search low class0

gi22 Auto on low 2

gi23 research Auto low class0

gi24 - Auto on low class3

-watchdog:

SW06 #show power inline IG4

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

IG4 Auto on low class0

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Absent of meter: 4

Invalid Signature counter: 0

SW06 #show interfaces announce IG4

Port: IG4

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no Yes Yes Yes Yes

Resolution of priority - Yes-

-Phone:

#show power inline gi10 SW06

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

GI10 Auto on low 2

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Missing Counter: 465

Invalid Signature counter: 0

#show int adv gi10 SW06

Port: gi10

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no Yes Yes Yes Yes

Resolution of priority - Yes-

-Phone:

SW06 #show power inline article IG 14

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

IG 14 Auto article on low 2

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Absent against: 0

Invalid Signature counter: 0

SW06 #show int adv article IG 14

Port: article IG 14

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no Yes Yes Yes Yes

Resolution of priority - Yes-

SW06 #.

-Phone:

#show power inline gi22 SW06

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

gi22 Auto on low 2

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Missing Counter: 591

Invalid Signature counter: 166

#show int adv gi22 SW06

Port: gi22

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no Yes Yes Yes Yes

Resolution of priority - Yes-

--also was the watchdog, now empty:

SW06 #show power inline gi23

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

gi23 research Auto low class0

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is disabled - detection is in progress

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Missing Counter: 587

Invalid Signature counter: 0

-wap:

SW06 #show power inline gi24

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

gi24 - Auto on low class3

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Missing Counter: 607

Invalid Signature counter: 3

SW06 #show int adv gi24

Port: gi24

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no yes no no no

Resolution of priority - Yes-

Other useful bits:

SW06 active spanning tree #show

Spanning tree disabled mode (floods BPDU) RSTP

By default port cost method: long

SW06 #sh worm

SW version 1.1.2.0 (November 12, 2011 time 23:34:26)

Start the 1.1.0.6 version (date may 11, 2011 time 18:31)

HW version V02

Hi Rich, reference this photo I just drew is a rough interpretation of how a switch 24 ports has guts. Each + block represents a processor. The numbers below represent the port Bank that corresponds to the transformer. Of course, MODULE POE is clearly identified. Each module 12 POE ports for services.

I think you have a completely different question. If the POE works for 5 to 30 minutes, it can be a problem of layer 1 (bad son) or a different, perhaps material condition being disturbed. If the switch is at fault, it seems more likely to be defective to a unit of buggy. I did a lot of research on the operation of the switch ASIC, transformer and modules of POE in the cohesion.

Quite frankly, I think you should go to the 1.2.7.76 firmware, factory reset the device and test all the ports you want using the same equipment. If maintaining the POE fall every 5 to 30 minutes and you are absolutely positive, that it is not a question of layer 1 or a configuration problem on your products, can I just replace the switch.

-Tom
Please evaluate the useful messages

Maximum power PoE switch SG100D - 8 p

Hi all...

Help, please

How PoE power of SG100D - 8 p?

its port 8 all support PoE?

Kind regards

Leonardus

Hi all

I wrote to the product manager switch (MP) and requested a document. He continued with a few detailed characteristics indicating the budget POE of 32watts spread over the ports 1 to 4. However, my statement above is correct.

A section of this document that the PM has sent me, is copied below.

Can't blame leolaohoo for being confused, because I think not publicly in the face of a document which indicates the power dedicated to the POE ports on switches in the 100 series.

When leolaohoo States in a question in a previous message and request confirmation, "basically what Dave said is that the switch can provide up to 8w of PoE power." my apologies for any misunderstanding.

The unmanged 8-port POE switches CAN provide up to 32Watts of POE power spread over four ports.

Best regards, Dave

Requirements for the wireless 11n

We are looking for in our series of 1130 standalone AP upupgrade of for a wireless LAN Controller 2504 Cisco and Cisco LWAPP AP 2600 we currently 1130 AP is connected to a 3560 10/100 POE switch. We also have a switch not POE 2960 10\100\1000.

The wireless 11n will work connected to the switch 10\100 3560 POE? Or we will have to get a 10\100\1000 POE switch? A cheaper alternative would be to get injectors feeding AP 2600 s to connect to the switch of 2960 10\100\1000?

You can still connect to the APS. 10/100 PoE switch. The only thing is that the switch port will be the bottleneck. With 802.11n, the customer will have more flow and you should make sure that you don't oversubscribe the Ethernet port.

Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

VPN for small offices - series 2811 vs RV

Hi all

Need advice

I have a question about this material to use for a small remote office.

We currently have
- 5 users
- 5 7941 phones
- 1 2811 (series, 2 FXS and 1 FXO)
- 1 3560g
All voice devices are controlled by a CUCM 9 in our main offices. The 2811 is also an MGCP gateway.

Currently, they connect via a T1, that management wants to disconnect the reason for its high cost, the T1 is connected to a 2811 (C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M) with the serial port and analog lines, behind the router, we a 3560 G 24 port (POE) with everyone connected.

They asked me to see if its possible to pass to a VPN site-to-site and possibly replace the 2811 and 3560 g with a much smaller device might be an all in one.

I've been looking around, and I did not any small business router that meets our needs. A tech colleague suggested looking in the RV series routers, but I don't see devices providing telephone services.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance

Assuming you have a Cisco 2800/3800 series or better, at Headquarters, I would stick with the 2811 router and make a site to site VPN tunnel. You can actually register the phones through the tunnel and then use SRST for relief when the tunnel falls. Of course, preventing the phones to make and receive calls without the tunnel, but at least they will be able to talk to each other. If you are really worried about having at least a work phone then the internet connection breaks down at the remote desktop, you can buy a single line of POTS of the telco and run it on your FXO port. This line would serve for only emergency calls if you fall the tunnel. Nevertheless, the 2811 is much more powerful than the RV series (excluding the part on one of the models RV wireless).

End of 2012 the Ethernet Mini Mac does not connect

Everything worked very well upward until a week ago. I did all these recent software updates to cause problems.

I'm running OS X 10.11.3. I use wired ethernet. My ethernet does not work. Preferences network indicates that the cable is disconnected. It is not the case. I tried to use another cable and same results. I have a managed switch and it still says that when the Mini is on that the port is turned on and has 1000 full duplex connection. When I power down the port turns off indicating it is nothing plugged in, when I turn on it powered back upward. Therefore, it is not as if the ethernet port has failed.

I tried to renew the DHCP lease in network, deactivation and reactivation of the ethernet service preferences and still no luck. Keeps coming up as ethernet is not connected. I opened terminal and ran ifconfig and receive nothing. I am unable to ping to any external site. I am also unable to connect to my modem.

Wireless works fine. I have a second, identical Mac Mini connected to the same hardware via ethernet, which works very well, so it doesn't seem to be any hardware related issues. I use all the gear from ubiquiti networks, 24-port POE switch and usg 4 router pro, all new age of 2 months. This must be a Mac issue and has nothing to do with my equipment. 2014 mac Book Pro works fine as well as 2 iPad Pros and 2 iPhones though wireless connections for them.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

It happened to other institutions.

Take a look at > If the Ethernet on your Mac stopped working recently - Apple supports

GigE lost frames/buffers

I'm losing Gige Frames/pads in a system that acquires way synchronous analog readings and images over long periods.

Computer: Nuvo 1300af 620, (Quad i7 processor clocked at 2.66 GHz, 5 ports POE GigE x, 3 GB of RAM, 256 GB SSD), Windows XP embedded, Image Acquisition OR August 2012. NiDaqmx, Labview 2009 pro

Camera: Basler Linescan RL2048 - 10gm Runner

Data acquisition: cDaq chassis with analog or 32-chan, OR 9401 9905 dig IO.

The camera and data acquisition modules use separate GigE ports which have different group addresses. GigE ports are disabled.

The LabView program has 2 while loops that run simultaneously. The CGI camera rotates at a speed of 3250 lines per second and has an image of 2048 x 384 (8.46 frames per second). CDaq NI9905 data acquisition module acquires simultaneously 18 channels analog readings to 3250 samples/second

Loop 1: Contains a Grab vi and an element of the queue vi. The vi Grab awaits the next buffer, then place for use of Tin while loop 2. The loop delay is set by the expectation of the next buffer (118ms) this loop has no other screws

Loop 2: contains a dequeue VI, waiting for the next element of the queue, setting the time of the loop. This loop also contains a VI to read NiDaqmx, who reads all the analog readings that are available each time around the loop. Images and analog readings are treated and are posted and immediately written to disk Solid State 2 files (1 analog data file file and.one of several image files). Writing of image files is organized so that these files will not exceed 1 GB in size: when an image file is full, writing going on to the next file. All files are created and opened at the start of the program.

At run time, at random intervals, a group of buffers to image is lost.

Monitoring of the VI Grab loop 1, it shows that when you run correctly, the increment of 1 buffer numbers whenever it reads a buffer, when buffers are lost, jumps from number of buffer to a value of 2 to more than 10. No errors are displayed. There is no change in the treatment in loop 2 at the point where the buffers are lost. Increase in the number of buffers (up to 100!) does not help

Applaud the time that the VI dequeue in while loop2 waits for the element following the queue, shows that this waiting time on average to about 60% of the time loop and goes through a minimum of 40%, except when the buffers are lost, when the timeout is momentarily not zero.

Windows performance analyzers show that the CPU usage is less than 20%, and the use of the network is less than 1%

Hi Blake,

I found a solution that solves my problem.

I thought that the VI Grab when the value to acquire the next buffer, return all gains buffer in sequence, unless a buffer is overwritten. Instead, if the buffers are entered not fast enough, it does not return the following buffer, but the last of them acquired and no error. I had put the number of buffers at 25 or more, so that replacement buffers was not a possibility.

I changed the program, so that keeps an account number of buffer (incrementing the number of buffer on each bucket) and specifies the number of buffer to the VI Grab. It works well, even on the occasions when the loop of the acquisition is occasionally momentarily delayed by up to a second or more, i suspect, Windows to write the contents of the disk the disk buffer, or do some other household.

Kind regards

Peter Westwood

PowerConnect 6224P installation assistance

Hello

new to managed networking so please be gentle.

I should add that a couple of VLANS to my existing UN managed LAN. I managed to get my hands on a 6224 P and have it set up as follows

! Current configuration:
! Description of the system 'Dell 24 ports PoE Gigabit Ethernet, 2.0.0.12, VxWorks5.5.1'
! Version of the software system 2.0.0.12
!
Configure
database of VLAN
VLAN 10,20,30,40
output
hostname "VOY-LAN-SW1.
battery
1 4 Member
output
10.10.1.254 IP address 255.255.255.0
default IP gateway - 10.10.1.12
IP routing
interface vlan 10
name "FCP-DEV-LAN."
Routing
IP 10.0.10.1 255.255.255.0
output
interface vlan 20
name 'Appassure-LAN. "
Routing
IP 10.0.20.1 255.255.255.0
output
interface vlan 30
name 'travel-LAN. "
Routing
IP 10.0.30.1 255.255.255.0
output
interface vlan 40
name "VOY - LAN"
Routing
10.0.0.253 IP address 255.255.255.0
output
level of f7587f035b7761fba5a45d070a7e97b5 user name 'admin' password encrypted 15
!
interface ethernet 1/g2
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g3
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g4
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g5
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g6
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g7
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g8
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g9
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g10
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g11
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g12
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g13
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 30
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g14
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 30
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g15
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 30
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g16
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 30
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g17
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 40
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g18
spanning tree portfast
switchport access vlan 30
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g19
switchport access vlan 40
output
output

so far in the test lab, it's all working, but I don't really have a load any on this topic. I can ping all machines on all the VLANS without problem, but I am very aware that this could go very wrong waqnt quickly so to minimize risk.

I have three unmanaged past that I need to connect to the 6224P which I'm looking to put on 1/1/g2-g4, I put Spanning tree portfast but I think it's maybe a wrong thing to do for these switches? pointers would be greatly appreciated and thanks for looking.

see you soon

Greg

You're right, you want to disable the portfast on ports that connect to other switches. Ports that connect to the workstations, servers, printers, etc. will want portfast enabled on them. Other than the config seems solid to me.

With the 62xx switches, they are not able to deliver their own management of VLANS, which by default is VLAN 1. If you do not plan the placement of all traffic on VLAN 1, you should not have problems. But if you plan to use VLAN 1 for all network traffic, you may need to make a slight change.

SRI G2s trunk between enhanced EtherSwitch modules?

I used enhanced Etherswitch modules before but never in the way I think a solution for a customer.

They want a data center in a solution so I spec'ing on 1 3945 with UCS, CUCME, unit, etc. plus a 24 ports PoE Etherswitch)

SM-ES3G-24-P)

.

For server redundancy, I put in a router 2921 with a blade of UCS and another 24 ports PoE Etherswitch.

My question is this. I can build and SVI on both routers to say VLAN20 running HSRP and then the trunk 2 routers together using a port on the Etherswitches just as I would do if I had a couple of normal switches? Or if this configuration is not supported?

My goal is to try to design a solution using only the routers without buying different external switches but the Etherswitches 2 in the router will have to shared resources and talk just like 2 external switches might.

Thanks for any help!

Chris

Hi Chris,

I didn't test, but I don't see any reason why it won't work.

HTH,
Lei Tian

Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

AP failed to connect with the WLC.

We have 5 sets of 1700 APs works on the mode of the controller and cisco WLC 2500.
I configured the controller as I always used to do, but this time the access points have been unable to reach the controller.
That's what I did:
controller IP address:192.168.1.250/24
GW:192.168.1.1
Primary DHCP: 192.168.1.250
I have connected the port1 controller with ethernet cable from the switch and the same switch I connected the AP.
We used the adapter instead of the POE switch.
I even tried assigning address to AP directly through the console as:
CAPWAP ap controller ip address and so on. This did not help either.

There was this message in the AP "% CAPWAP-5-DHCP_RENEW: could not find WLC by using DHCP IP." DHCP IP renewal. "
Moreover, the POE ports in the controller, they provide enough energy for the PA to operate?
Help, please.
I have attached the PuTTY log as well.

Hello
WLC connection has successfully been created. Then he for some reason any. I don't know if this helps, but try to connect the ethernet cable directly to the AP instead of port POE port to THE.
You can use port POE on AP even if you don t use the POE switch.

And regarding the port POE on WLC. Cisco doesn´t recommend that you directly connect AP to WLC, but it is possible.

Also I Don t see that the IP address is assigned by DHCP.
Try also to use the commands:
CAPWAP ap ip address...
CAPWAP ap ip default-gateway...

I guess the WLC and switch are configured correctly.

EDIT:

I had similar problem today.
Just connect the cable from the console to AP, go to mode and type the commands:
Claire capwap private-config
Claire lwap private-config

then reload AP with command "reload".

After these commands AP joined succesfully WLC

3560 48 PORT POE

Similar Questions

Model AP... AIR-LAP1131AG-E-K9

Picture from AP... C1130-K9W8-M

Version of IOS... 12.4 (21 a) JHB1

Drawing.jpg

Maybe you are looking for