9 times slower than directly from whatz PP 2014 (PC) upward exports SOUL 2014?

Similar Questions

• The binding is 60 times slower than compromising

  Hello
  
  I have a fairly serious problem using Toplink liaison. My setup is
  
  TopLink 9.0.4.5
  Oracle 10g EE 10.2.0.4.0 (64-bit, partitioning options, Data Mining and Real Application Testing)
  Oracle JDBC Thin (11.2.0.1.0 or 10.2.0.4.0) driver
  
  running in a Tomcat 5.5 environment.
  
  Our usual configuration is with BindAllParameters = 'true', which is well in 99% of cases. But in a special case, which is the search functionality of our application (insurance agents management application),
  a SQL is about 60 times slower with a binding, that without binding. I enclose the SQL at the end of the message, but what is quite special about it is that it uses a large amount of 'IN' clauses. I found an older version
  display indicating that Toplink (or Oracle JDBC) has a problem with IN-clauses and binding. Can anyone confirm this?
  
  As I said, the SQL part of a people search feature, so there are a lot of variants. Not all variations exhibit this behavior, so I guess, that Oracle probably uses different execution plans for the use of prepared statements or direct execution. Someone can he also confirm?
  
  Finally, is it possible to record the execution inside the Tomcat application plan?
  
  Thanks in advance for any help, as I said earlier, this problem is currently very critical, since we are 2 weeks before production,
  
  Thorsten.
  
  Here's the SQL example (with the bind variable already replaced):
  

  /* Formatted on 2010/02/08 10:27 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
  SELECT t0.partner_id
    FROM aidatint.papartner t0
   WHERE (    (    (    (    (   (    (t0.schwebe_kz = 'S')
                                  AND (t0.aktgfid_rid = '126562119515400004')
                                 )
                              OR (    (t0.schwebe_kz = 'O')
                                  AND (t0.aktgfid_rid <> '126562119515400004')
                                 )
                             )
                         AND (   (t0.gueltigbis_dt IS NULL)
                              OR (t0.gueltigvon_dt < t0.gueltigbis_dt)
                             )
                        )
                    AND (t0.mcname_txt = 'MEIER')
                   )
               AND (t0.partner_id IN (
                       SELECT DISTINCT t1.partner_id
                                  FROM aidatint.paadresse t1
                                 WHERE (    (    (   (    (t1.schwebe_kz = 'S'
                                                          )
                                                      AND (t1.aktgfid_rid =
                                                              '126562119515400004'
                                                          )
                                                     )
                                                  OR (    (t1.schwebe_kz = 'O'
                                                          )
                                                      AND (t1.aktgfid_rid <>
                                                              '126562119515400004'
                                                          )
                                                     )
                                                 )
                                             AND (   (t1.gueltigbis_dt IS NULL
                                                     )
                                                  OR (t1.gueltigvon_dt <
                                                                t1.gueltigbis_dt
                                                     )
                                                 )
                                            )
                                        AND (t1.mcort_txt = 'KOELN')
                                       ))
                   )
              )
          AND (t0.partner_id IN (
                  SELECT t2.partner_id
                    FROM aidatint.paparolle t2
                   WHERE (    (    (    (   (    (t2.schwebe_kz = 'S')
                                             AND (t2.aktgfid_rid =
                                                            '126562119515400004'
                                                 )
                                            )
                                         OR (    (t2.schwebe_kz = 'O')
                                             AND (t2.aktgfid_rid <>
                                                            '126562119515400004'
                                                 )
                                            )
                                        )
                                    AND (    (t2.gueltigvon_dt <=
                                                 TO_DATE ('20100208',
                                                          'YYYYMMDD')
                                             )
                                         AND (   (t2.gueltigbis_dt >
                                                     TO_DATE ('20100208',
                                                              'YYYYMMDD'
                                                             )
                                                 )
                                              OR (t2.gueltigbis_dt IS NULL)
                                             )
                                        )
                                   )
                               AND (t2.geschobjtyp_typ = 'VMVT')
                              )
                          AND (t2.goid_id IN (
                                  SELECT t3.vermittlervertragid_id
                                    FROM aidatint.prvvsvermittlervertrag t3
                                   WHERE (    (   (    (t3.schwebe_kz = 'S')
                                                   AND (t3.aktgfid_rid =
                                                            '126562119515400004'
                                                       )
                                                  )
                                               OR (    (t3.schwebe_kz = 'O')
                                                   AND (t3.aktgfid_rid <>
                                                            '126562119515400004'
                                                       )
                                                  )
                                              )
                                          AND (t3.kumulnr_txt IN (
                                                  SELECT t4.bereichsnr_txt
                                                    FROM aidatint.prvvsstrukturangausdienst t4
                                                   WHERE (    (    (   (    (t4.schwebe_kz =
                                                                                'S'
                                                                            )
                                                                        AND (t4.aktgfid_rid =
                                                                                '126562119515400004'
                                                                            )
                                                                       )
                                                                    OR (    (t4.schwebe_kz =
                                                                                'O'
                                                                            )
                                                                        AND (t4.aktgfid_rid <>
                                                                                '126562119515400004'
                                                                            )
                                                                       )
                                                                   )
                                                               AND (    (t4.gueltigvon_dt <=
                                                                            TO_DATE
                                                                               ('20100208',
                                                                                'YYYYMMDD'
                                                                               )
                                                                        )
                                                                    AND (   (t4.gueltigbis_dt >
                                                                                TO_DATE
                                                                                   ('20100208',
                                                                                    'YYYYMMDD'
                                                                                   )
                                                                            )
                                                                         OR (t4.gueltigbis_dt IS NULL
                                                                            )
                                                                        )
                                                                   )
                                                              )
                                                          AND (t4.schluessel_txt LIKE
                                                                  '##TH###1###4%'
                                                              )
                                                         ))
                                              )
                                         ))
                              )
                         ))
              )
         )

  You can disable the binding at the application level.

  On your TopLink DatabaseQuery (ReadAllQuery) do.

  query.setShouldBindAllParameters (false);

• Windows xp cpu benchmarks more than three times slower than on windows 7 running on my i5 760 image

  I ran cpu benchmarks under xp on a pent. 4 @ 3 GHz and an i5 quad processor. @ 2.9 ghz and got almost the same results.

  However when I run the same test on the i5 quad. processor the platform of windows 7, I get 3.5 times the speed.

  It seems to me the xp runs only on a single core i5 quad.  I also understand that taskmanger XP has a

  additional oppition called 'set afinity' when you right click on a process and run multi cores or processors. This isn't there?

  My question is how to make xp to use all 4 cores. It should be quick blazeing and it's not. And while windows 7 is really

  most enjoyable of my software does not work on it. I need my xp and it wouldn't hurt if it was really fast.

  Hi carlcrone,

  What version of Service Pack is installed on your computer?

  Windows XP supports quad core processors. I recommend you to ask your question to TechNet for assistance.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/windowsxpitpro

  In Windows 7, you can try to run the software in compatibility mode & check if it works.

  For more information, please visit: make older programs run in this version of Windows

  For faster access to the internet, you can also try to upgrade to Internet Explorer 9.

  For more information, please visit: How to install or uninstall Internet Explorer 9?

  Hope the helps of information.

  Please post back and we do know.

• Why is the order of 100 times slower than ibrsp with driver vs 1.7 2.3?

  
  
  

• I've recently updated to El captain and now my Mac (which is quite old) is slow dreafully.  Take everything 10 times more than before.  Any tips on speeding to the top?

  I've recently updated to El captain and now my Mac (which is quite old) is slow dreafully.  Take everything 10 times more than before.  Any tips on speeding to the top?

  I have two Macs running El Capitan, which is old enough (2008 iMac) and am not at all have this problem. If you look through these forums, you will find that many of the slow running issues have been resolved simply by getting rid of the 3rd party anti virus and Mac apps from cleaning. Here, the consensus seems to be that these applications are useless on Macs and slow them down at best and are downright harmful in the worst case. I have none of them on any of my Macs and you have never run in the problems of virus or malware from OS X launch back to 1999. My advice would be to uninstall everything these programs from your Mac and see if that helps. And don't bother to re install later. You do not claim them, particularly the so-called cleaners. OS X does this work by himself.

  Rick

• My windows 8.1 is running very slow and freezes from time to time.

  My windows 8.1 is running very slow and freezes from time to time. So I ran sfc/scannow. It finds corrupted files, but could not correct. So I ran "dism / online/cleanup-image /restorehealth ' but there as well. Please help as soon as possible. Thank you!!!

  Original title: find files corrupt after sfc/scannow and could not repair

  Hello Akash,

  Thanks for the reply.

  As you said, after completing the scan found SFC, you get an error message indicating that there is corruption but was not repaired. Then, please follow the following suggestions to solve the problem.

  Use the System File Checker tool to repair missing or corrupted system files

  (Refer to: manually replace the corrupted file with a good copy of the file)

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929833/en-us

  I hope this helps. Otherwise, feel free to write us again and we will be happy to help you.

• Why is it slower than iPad Pro of Macbook Pro?

  https://youtu.be/sO3vuz1dDRg

  Here is the video in question.  It was made in iMovie and transferred through the upload of desktop browser to the Youtube that can enter directly from the finder.  The video lasts 200 MB and 02:04 minutes.  Not particularly big.  Seen on my iPad Pro, which has the same size, basically like my MacBook Pro screen, it starts with playing 1080 p right away.  My MacBook Pro, connected to the same wifi router, then try it.  He can barely load and play the video to the P. 480 it also works very well with my iPhone 6plus and great works even streaming 1080 p when I connect the iPhone via a HTMI cable to my TV.

  Latest iOS and OS.

  Ookla faster results while wifi.

  MacBook Pro: 43 downwards, to 79.

  iPad Pro: down, up to 89 39

  iPhone: 30 down, up to 54.

  This is a question for Apple or Youtube?

  I solved the problem myself.  I also deleted the video, sorry.  I decided to take an iMovie saved like a k 4 file in Quicktime and export it to 1080 p for iPad devices.  This has created an incredibly smooth and clear mp4 video without distortion due to compression.  In addition, the over 50 MB more file smaller than 180 file 200 MB created by iMovie.  When I downloaded this movie on Youtube, it took less time for the 1080 p option appears, and of course, it is clear.  More important still, it loads now well on my MacBook Pro of retina now, like the iPad Pro.  Lesson learned.  Save big by iMove, export to QuickTime.

• Is there a way to delete workouts directly from the device?

  I went on a few sets of tests today and I was just wondering if I there are plans to allow the deletion of data directly from the unit rather than having to wait for the connection at home store.

  There is a new thread about this at least 4 times a week, maybe after in one of those a motorcycle person answered. This will help them to see and I hope to follow through.

  https://forums.Motorola.com/posts/c235022729

  https://forums.Motorola.com/posts/cf61c47878

  https://forums.Motorola.com/posts/a12c85a9a9

• Slower than Oracle 11 g

  I ran SQLFire installed locally on a system Win 8 with 12 GB of memory...

  I tried to run the comparison on the database of 5 million ranks test; one Oracle 11g one another 1.1 SQLFire (downloaded for evaluation). Just a simple query SELECT on the code.

  Here are the results of the 3 races:

  lines of 2 members (Locator & server1) 5 M ~ 2.5 GB SELECT statement

  Oracle: 16

  SQLFire: 46

  Oracle: 15

  SQLFire: 45

  Oracle: 15

  SQLFire: 45

  It is said that sqlfire works 30 times faster than Oracle 11 g all the test shows that sqlfire 3 times slower.

  Just curious to know what is missing?

  Hello

  Looked at the code, and here are a few comments:

  • The code is just do an executeQuery() and do not consume all the results. Most DBs, including Oracle and SQLFire, flow results gradually as they are consumed and executeQuery() by itself will probably not do much of the work in this case. For a meaningful comparison, the code should consume all results in Oracle and SQLFire (attention: it can take a lot of time with this large number of results). Please update that the look of numbers like for you code as below:

  long tStart = java.lang.System.currentTimeMillis ();
  RSet = stmt.executeQuery ("SELECT COLUMN1, COLUMN2, Column3 FROM table1");

  int numRows = 0;

  While (rset.next ()) {}

  numRows ++;

  }
  long tend = java.lang.System.currentTimeMillis ();

  System.out.println ("Oracle:" + (trend - tStart) + "for" + numrows + "rows.");

  • The code executes the query "SELECT COLUMN1, COLUMN2, Column3 FROM table1" against Oracle but runs 'SELECT id, data, search FOR app.test where (search = 'aA' OR search = 'aa' OR 'AA' = search OR search = 'Aa')' against SQLFire. Is it wanted, because that it is not a fair comparison? I'm assuming that the code runs the same queries against both, then again once need to consume the results completely for a fair comparison. For the request of the latter, you can optimize a lot if you use case-sensitive index added in SQLFire 1.1: vFabric Documentation Center , then the request can be "SELECT id, data, search FOR app.test where search ="aa"
  • SQLFire itself is not well optimized for queries that return a large number of lines for example > 10000 or more lines. It is better optimized for queries returning small average number of lines which, in our view, are much more likely to run in real-world applications. There are still a few models of complex query for which Oracle can do better, but for current releases, we target the most common query patterns. In future releases, we will close the gaps in other areas. That said, we really wanted more on queries that run evil in SQLFire.
  • Another point of difference in the small benchmarks is that SQLFire is a java engine runs first few queries slower than hotspot JIT comes into play, so in general, you will see the first operations of thousand being slower that a server has just started. Real-world applications will be won't on the first operations bit, so it might be preferable to a cue point ignore first few results in a freshly started cluster (or if it a long run cluster, then it's not bad).
  • Finally, the mentioned comparison is made reference to update the PTAC (the one without any limitation of operations) that contains a mixture of queries during each transaction than most close as possible to the real-world applications and updates. It is in such a mixed load that SQLFire really shines more traditional DBs.

• accelerate CFHTTP on CF10 (5000 x slower than under CF8)

  Hi, we have freshly installed a large application of CF8 to CF10 and see that CFHTTP performance is * much * slower on the new system.

  We've checked by sequentially 50 CFHTTP to the small static active calls running on an Apache Server, measure the response time with gettickcount() and averaging on several tracks.

  On the installation of our old (Ubuntu + JRun + CF 8), we are averaging about 1 ms per request.

  On our new (Centos + CF 10 standalone) installation, we are averaging 5000 ms per request. Is 5,000 times slower.

  Initially, we have assumed that this phenomenon was linked to questions of generation of entropy as the first query in a series of tests would be relatively fast back (a few hundred Ms total) compared to all requests to this term.  However, try to change the JVM settings as prescribed is not solved the problem.  We tried more far using entropy-generating alternative tools (such as recommended in the blog original post cities in the above thread), but that did not help either one.

  Note that we also tested performance outside CF http using wget from a shell script, where we have seen good performance (about 1 ms per request).

  Any help on this will be greatly appreciated, thanks!

  
  

  Update: just tested the CFHTTP CF + http://coldfusion9.blogspot.com/2012/03/custom-cfhttp-tag.html Java-based alternative

  It took a few minor bug fixes, but is greatly outperforming CFHTTP from CF 10, with an average of 33 ms by request (always much slower than CF 8, but can be used for most of the cases).  However, I always look for a solution restore speed appropriate for CFHTTP!

  Post edited by: Jon Obuchowski to add the test with the custom CFHTTP tag

  Thank you.  I have modified the code and added 2 additional calls to the CFC HTTPRequest and CFX_HTTP5.  (I had to also modify the CFC to activate applications without the URL/form vars).

  I tried this on ColdFusion 8, 9 & 10 Windows.  I shot 50 files of 5 different internal web servers.  (WARNING: the specifications are not the same for each server CF.)

  Here are the averages.

  10 ColdFusion CFHTTP: 9.04 CFC: 18,14 CFX_HTTP5: 1.26

  ColdFusion 9 CFHTTP: 8.08 CFC: CFX_HTTP5 158.92: 2.4

  ColdFusion 8 CFHTTP: 4.86 CFC: 149.14 CFX_HTTP5: 2.14

  I posted a blog in this regard entry and shared the CFML that I used to compare performance:

  http://gamesover2600.Tumblr.com/post/88683513184/ColdFusion-CFHttp-versus-httprequestcfc-v ersus

• My iPhone will not send photos or other documents directly from in Apps

  My iPhone 5 has always been able to send photos directly from the Photo App, as well as sending PDF files directly from the Pages App or other documents from other applications. Now, it is no more the case. After hitting the "send" - button, you hear the his "Whoosh"but nothing is actually sent! ".

  I discovered only after people complained to me for not getting points I thought that I had sent.

  When you import the same documents in Mail, there is no problem at all they are sent. The problem exists only IN applications.

  I tried to restart the phone several times as well as resetting - no change.

  It isn't a question of 2 check points.

  I would be very grateful if someone knew the solution to this problem.

  See you soon!

  I think the next thing I would try is to reset all settings. Settings > general > reset > reset all settings. This will return t e the device settings, to where they were out of the box - to the factory settings. You will need to enter all the settings again including WiFi passwords.

  If this does not work, back up, restore settings, and then restore the backup. If it still does not work, restore like new.

  How to clear your iOS device and then set up as a new device or restore from backups - Apple Support

  The backup of your iPhone, iPad and iPod touch - Apple Support

  Use iTunes on your Mac or PC to restore your iPhone, iPad or iPod settings - Apple Support

• New content directly from the server

  How can I force my browser to download new content directly from the server? It was possible to do so using the SHIFT key pressed and make page reload at the same time. I tried and it didn't work. I'm doing something wrong?

  You can reload webpages and ignore the cache to refresh potentially stale or corrupt.

  • Hold down the SHIFT key and click the Reload button
  • Press 'Ctrl + F5' or 'Ctrl + Shift + R' (Windows, Linux)
  • Press 'Command + shift + R' (Mac)

• Firefox 4.0.1 is extremely slow - slower than previous versions

  Firefox 4.0.1 is extremely slow - slower than previous versions. Response time extremely slow, even after I visited a Web site previously.

  Go to HELP and select "restart with disabled modules. If access speeds back up then there is a problem with a plugin addon. Post here with results.

• Satellite P10 802 slower than ever

  Can t run add or remove programs in Control Panel on the Satellite P10-802 or change the restore settings or delete temporary internet files etc.
  I get a warning open the file or the option to run the program or the black box screen system run.

  Any ideas guys?
  It s driving me crazy as a computer slower than ever!

  When did you reinstall the OS?

  Maybe it's time to refresh the operating system

• Problem: Build a VI to display a string in the table of the lights. Each letter must be posted in a separate table and letters must move from one table to the other in the direction from left to right.

  Hi all

  Problem: Build a VI to display a string in the table of the lights. Each letter must be posted in a separate table and letters must move from one table to the other in the direction from left to right.

  I did program mentioned above but it does not work. Can you tell me what is the problem?

  There is no error is indicated in the program. If someone knows about it please try to find solutions and help me out of this problem.

  I have attached my program with this message.

  Thank you in advance!

  (1) FOR loops are your friend here.  You can make a slight restructuring using loops, and then you will have less mess to deal with, the inner loop through tunnels of autoindexing to make it even simpler.

  (2) I would only treat the numeric values of the characters.  So go terminal of control of the chain, the capital letters and byte array to before the outer loop.  You can use a size of Board over there to tell how many times the outer loop to iterate.

  (3) the Index table is extensible.  So you only need over the index of the first, and it will increment itself, as it develops.

  (4) you need to finish the lookup table (table 3D)