ACL entering for public router VPN

Similar Questions

• ASA-to-router VPN, private, public

  I have a setup where a customer will send calls to a Complutense University of MADRID, from a private address, through a VPN tunnel Terminal to a 2811. The call to hit a SBC that caters to the public and is located just behind the router on FE0/1. (See photo)

  Traffic through the ASA is to be exempted from NAT.

  Since it is all public on my end and my waypoints by default for the router of my ISP, I guess I don't have anything other than a default route. (I'm not under routing protocols - just a static outgoing route)

  The tunnel does not come to the top. In fact, I never see that no traffic hit my side in all. Does anyone have experience making a private VPN, or know an example of config anywhere?

  This is my Bill at the end of the config:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 4

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  lifetime 28800

  ISAKMP crypto key XXXXXXXXXX address (public #1) No.-xauth

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac XXXSET

  XXXMAP 4 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined by peers (public address #1).

  Set the security association idle time 3600

  game of transformation-XXXSET

  PFS group2 Set

  match address 170

  access-list 170 permit ip host (public address #3) 10.0.0.5

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  IP (public address #2) 255.255.255.252

  load-interval 30

  Speed 100

  full-duplex

  No cdp enable

  card crypto XXXMAP

  service-policy output AutoQoS-policy-UnTrust

  Thank you

  Paul

  Your configuration looks very good.

  Phase 1 comes up when you try to pass traffic through? "cry isa to show her.

  Back P1, P2 comes up? "See the crypto ipsec his | I ident | SPI | BA | desc ".

  If none is coming, run a debugging:

  debugging cry isa

  debugging ips cry

  See if the tunnel is initiated when traffic is sent. As long as you have a default route pointing outgoing and don't have any other way, you should be fine. Looks like everything will be a connected network.

• IOS router + VPN + ACS downloadable IP ACL

  I want to use the function "Downloadable IP ACL" 3825-router VPN (OI 12.4 T) in combination with a CBS.

  In many documents and discussions, I read that it is possible to use the DACLs on "devices Cisco IOS version 12.3 (8) T or higher.

  Authentication and authorization by the AEC works and the device gets some settings of the av-pair-feature.

  I have tried several things to apply the DACL as the use of av pairs or ACS "Downloadable IP ACL" function, but nothing works.

  In the debug log, I see that the av pair is transmitted to the device, but it is not used.

  --> Can you tell me, is it possible to use the DACLs on the IOS routers?

  --> How does it work? What can I change?

  --> Is there a good manual to apply it?

  Thanks for your help!

  Martin

  It would be useful to know the PURPOSE of what you're trying to do...

  AFAIR client config mode requires no ACL for filtering short tunnel split ACL... and I have no way to test right now.

  If you want to allow or not some clients access to certain subnets why not investigate tunneling ACL and vpn-filter in combination with ACS split will rather than for the DACL.

• Downloadable ACLs for users of VPN

  Hello

  I replaced the old pix with ASA (7.2). There were groups configured for the remote VPN users authenticated through the ACS and ACS download a specific ACL for each group to the PIX. After the replacement, users cannot establish the VPN connection. After troubleshooting, I discovered that the downloadable ACLs were not working very well. When I disabled this option the established tunnel. When I get back to the old pix with the same configuration, it works very well with downloadable ACL option. I opened a TAC case and he said the v3.0 ACS (I) are not compatible with the ASA. He did not really convince me and he asked to try to use the option to pair AV. I tried option pair AV with ASA and it did not work also. can you please advice.

  Hello

  Check out this point,

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCef21184

  In addition, 3.0 is very old, and I guess that in this version, we have "Downloadable PIX ACL" and not "downloadable IP ACL", on ASA download able ACL will work but with "Downloadable IP ACL" but not with "Downloadable PIX ACL".

  Kind regards

  Prem

• How can I secure my laptop when I surf the internet via a public router at work?

  How can I secure my laptop when I surf the internet via a public router at work? I mean if I use a router to work and others use too and I use a private laptop! I heard that someone hase the knoladge he can enter my laptop the couscous that he uses the same router I do. you have a special program for that, or is there a place in my computer that I need to enable to avoid the unwanted entries?

  If your Windows is updated and your Windows Firewall is enabled and that you have updated anti-virus, that would be fine. In Windows 7, you must check Action Center in Control Panel to see your security status, if something is wrong that it will show a message in Windows XP and Windows Vista, he calls the center of security.

  They may only enter your laptop or hack, if your firewall is disabled or there is a vulnerability in your system or a Malware would cause of vulnerability, and in all cases to ensure that your Windows updates and anti-virus is running, you are protected.

  Another thing is that if your router requires the password, then choose strong password and change it regularly, if it is public without password or authentication, then you need to careful when visiting Web sites because they could be monitor and publicly display information. Some websites have encryption that in Internet Explorer, it shows as a lock icon pad indicating that your transaction is encrypted and you're safe.

  It depends also wireless encryption in your company that will be in service by admin or SOUND Department if it's WPA2 which is good but for WEP or WPA, you should be very careful. I suggest to discuss this issue with your COMPUTER service too.

• Router VPN, where to place?

  I have a Cisco ASA NAT fact.

  I have a 2801 with OBJECTIVE VPN.

  Should I place external int of the router outside the firewall and internal int of the router in the DMZ of firewall IOS execution of ASA-then on the outside... or place the external int of the router in the DMZ - ASA and internal int of the router network internally, then do a NAT one to one in external int of the router with ASA? If I do the 2nd option, I have headaches with NAT and IPSec tunnels? More precisely if I want to protect the public NAT had the IP address of the servers in a DMZ instead of private so I don't overlap LANs...?

  Thank you!

  I knew of your sugestion ecrypted ipsec rehbeh will go to the DMZ-1 for the router, and then after it cracked me he switch to the router on the inside interface, then to the ASA dmz-2 finally to the asa inside the interface to the private network.

  It is good for security but a cuple of disadvantages as u mentioned it will be higher performance on the firewall and it will consume more public ip address and interfaces

  as I sujested before

  and also it is sujested by sevral cisco cruises and the design of the security templates

  It's better to divide your network to the security layer

  so when you put the router in front of the fire wall, it will be considered as router permiter and at this point, you can allow only know good circulation (called model of security policy) and also to terminate the vpn on it so the vpn will be decrypted for the firewall (the idea even URS) while the vpn connection traffic will be exposed to the firewall for inspection for example inspection request extra packages for the filltering filltering been on the permiter router, mybe will be sent to the AIP - ssm IPS firewall model for inspection signtures (called model signture who deny traffic unfamiliar)

  will, is also part of the security in the deployment depth

  Thank you and so useful rates

• IOS router VPN client

  Hi all

  I have 2 sites connected through a VPN between 2 IOS routers.

  I have also some customers switched that need to connect on the inside network via a VPN with one of the routers.

  The VPN client software is enough or should I take into account the other components (for example an AAA for Xauth server)?

  Someone at - it an example configuration for the router IOS?

  Thank you

  If you more security, you can use the aaa server:

  http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ios_usr_rad.html .

  You can also perform local authentication on the router:

  http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ios-unity.html .

  Kind regards

  Eric

• XP key wep changes for new router linksys after the connection. you need to reinstall the WEP every time you start from the top.

  XP key wep changes for new router linksys after the connection. you need to reinstall the WEP every time you start from the top.

  Hello

  Let us perform the steps below and check out them.

  a. click "Start," "Control Panel", then "Add or Remove Programs". In the box "Currently installed programs", find the name of your wireless router. Click on the name of the software, and then click 'remove '. Click 'Yes' when prompted to confirm.
  b. click "Start" then "run". Type "Services.msc" and click "OK". Select 'Wireless Zero Configuration'. Click on 'start '.
  c. click 'Action', 'properties '. In the drop-down menu "Startup Type", click on the arrow and select 'Automatic' to assign the commissioning of automatic Wireless Auto Configuration. Click on 'OK '.
  d. restart your computer.
  e. right click on "Wireless connections" icon Select "View available wireless connections." Click on "change the order of preferred networks. Select the name of your network, and then click "Properties". Erase the old key and enter a new. Click the checkbox next to "Automatically use that key." Click on 'OK '.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you, and in what concerns:
  Shekhar S - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.
  If this post can help solve your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• NAC Appliance with ASA (for remote user VPN)

  I have a pair of firewall 5520 cisco which is used as a VPN gateway (for remote user VPN) and perimeter firewall Internet (to provide outbound internet connectivity).

  We allow the NAC to remote VPN users. I have it will be deployed with active 3 layer inband.

  The problem with this design is that how to ensure that outgoing internet traffic does not pass through the CASE?

  I heard about couple of optioins:

  -ACB (for send only IP subnet to VPN users remote to go through CASE)

  -Version 8.x characteristic of ASA (Restrcit access to VLAN under Group Policy).

  I intend to do with ASA firewall where I can set a new subinterface on the SAA (with a new tag VLAN) and under the group policy for remote user VPN, I select the option to "restrict access to the new VLAN.

  My question is: is - it still works (even if the firewall have a route to the internal network by using the 'inside' interface and NOT the new interface of the NAC). If this does not work, please let me know what are the other options for this type of deployment.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  It should work. Please see the attached PDF for more clarity on this topic: https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-9102

  HTH,

  Faisal

• NPS Windows Help for authentication of aaa for Cisco router - is it safe?

  I am very confused about how all this works and was hoping someone could help me.

  I followed a bunch of tutorials online for authentication RADIUS of installation on a Cisco router and he did to a NPS Windows Server. Now I can ssh into the router my AD account.

  Now that I got it to work, I go to the settings to make sure everything is secure.

  On my router, the config is pretty simple:

  aaa new-modelaaa group server radius WINDOWS_NPSserver-private 123.123.123.123 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 key mykeyaaa authentication login default local group WINDOWS_NPS
  
  ip domain-name MyDomcrypto key generate rsa
  
  (under vty and console)# login authentication default
  On the NPS Windows:
  I created a new RADIUS client for the router.
  Created a secret shared and specified Cisco as the name of the seller.
  Created a new strategy of network with my desired conditions.
  And now the frame of the configuration of the network policy that worries me:
  
  
  So initially I thought my AD credentials were being sent over the wire in plain text, but I did a capture and saw this:
  
  
  
  capture.jpg
  
          
      
  
  
  How is my password being encrypted and how strong is the encryption?
  
  Another thing is how can I configure aaa authentication with mschapv2? The documentation I saw for mschapv2 uses the "ppp authentication ms-chap-v2" command, but I'm not using ppp I'm using aaa with a radius server.
   
  			 
  Hello
  RADIUS encrypts the password, but sends the username in clear. GANYMEDE encrypts the user name and password.
  You can find the encryption used by RADIUS in the RFC scheme:
  https://Tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2865#page-27
  MS-Chap-V2 is used for the authentication of users such as the remote access and vpn, not management switch
  Thank you
  John
  		   

• Cisco 1700 Setup as a hub for Cisco Anyconnect VPN

  The complete configuration for the router is attached. Additional configuration includes forwarding port 443 (the two tcp/udp), udp 4500, udp 500 and udp 50 to 192.168.1.20.

  Objective: Configure Cisco 1700 router as a VPN server, which a Cisco Anyconnect VPN client in. The VPN server is behind a NAT.

  Question 1: The Cisco Anyconnect client pulls its set of configuration of the router? I just need to point to the correct IP address and hit connect and it will do the rest? If not, what additional client side configuration must be done? I noticed, it tries to connect on port 443 to my router, but I don't really know why and I know that my router is not listening on this port, so I know I'm missing something:-D.

  Question 2: What are the features specifically include easy vpn server? I am confused as to exactly what it is. From what I can tell when you configure easy vpn server you simply set up a regular VPN.

  Question 3: Cisco Easy VPN remote has something to do with Cisco Anyconnect or they are completely distinct?

  Sorry for the newbie questions. It's really hard to understand the different systems and features on it and most of the examples I found dealt with the VPN router to router rather than configurations just for computers of end users, but I'll be the first to admit that I am new on this hahaha.

  Thanks for your help.

  PS: Any comment on the misconfigs are welcome. I'm still trying to understand fully exactly what each command does.

  Grant

  Grant,

  AnyConnect can do SSLVPN or IPsec (with IKEv2), ezvpn is all about IKEv1, it won't work.

  There (part 3) customers who will be able to connect to ezvpn, as well as the former customer Cisco VPN, but AC is not.

  BTW... it's not 50/UDP, this is IP protocol 50 (or sometimes 51) - ESP (or AH).

  You don't have TCP and UDP 443 for IPsec, but you may need them for SSL.

  And seriously... series of 1700? Wow, this is a 'retro' kit :-) Support ended 6 years ago.

  M.

• Route VPN site to site on one path other than the default gateway

  I want to route VPN site-to-site on one path other than the default gateway

  ASA 5510

  OS 8.0 8.3 soon

  1 (surf) adsl line interface default gateway

  line 1 interface SDSL (10 VPN site-to-site)

  1 LAN interface

  What's possible?

  Thank you

  Sorry for my English

  Here is the assumption that I will do:

  -Your IP SHDL is 200.1.1.1, and the next hop is 200.1.1.2

  -Your LAN-to-LAN ends on this interface (interface card crypto SHDL)

  -VPN peer 1 - 150.1.1.1 and LAN is 192.168.1.0/24

  -VPN peer 2 - 175.1.1.1 and LAN is 192.168.5.0/24

  This is the routing based on the assumption above:

  Route SHDL 150.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.2

  Route SHDL 175.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.2

  Route SHDL 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 200.1.1.2

  Route SHDL 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 200.1.1.2

  Hope that helps.

• Static and NAT router to router VPN

  Hello

  I have two site VPN using routers. The VPN is fine, BUT - at the end of the seat, the customer has NAT entries static to allow incoming connections - any service that has a NAT static to allow incoming connections from the Internet is inaccessible in the same way. Ping, for example, doesn't have this problem because there is no static NAT entry. I tried to configure a route map-"No. - nat" according to the http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949ef.shtml , I thought I was working.

  H.O. has the IP 131.203.64.0/24 and 135.0.0.0/24 (I know, I know - I'm trying to change), and the R.O. 192.168.1.0/24.

  Bits of configuration:

  IP nat inside source overload map route SHEEP interface Ethernet0

  IP nat inside source static tcp 135.0.0.248 131.203.100.27 3389 3389 extensible

  (other static removed)

  Int-E0-In extended IP access list

  ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  (other entries deleted)

  access-list 198 deny ip 131.203.64.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 198 deny ip 135.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 198 allow ip 135.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

  SHEEP allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 198

  1 remove the static entry for the specified host the VPN problem, but obviously breaks things :(

  2. as mentioned, the VPN itself works fine, I can ping hosts perfectly.

  Any help greatly appreciated :)

  Thank you

  Mike.

  You must use the option of the route to the static NAT map. This is a new feature in 12.2 (4) T according to this page:

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/ipras_r/ip1_i2g.htm#1079180

  He must do exactly what you want. The old, another way to do is use "The thing", where you create a loopback interface and don't make a nat interface and use routing strategy for routing VPN traffic to one address on the same subnet as the loopback interface, but not the address of the loop. IOS then that réacheminera traffic to the real destination (in this case the remote VPN site), but since now it is not a 'ip nat inside' interface, the static nat translations does not apply and the VPN traffic will not be translated. The problem with this solution is that all loopback traffic is switched to the process, so it is a bit of a hack, but these things are sometimes necessary.

  HTH

• When I write editorials and press ENTER, it does not work and I have to press the arrow to go. Also ctrl + enter for auto site full addressdoesn can't work.

  When I write a Web site address and press ENTER, it doesn't fit to the page and I have to press the arrow to go. Also ctrl + enter for the AutoComplete does not work the address of the site. Lately, I noticed this problem in 6 FF. I expect the upgrade to 4 FF will solve this problem, but he persists.
  Thank you

  This may be due to a problem with an add-on. To find out how to solve this to find out what is causing the problem, see https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

• How to recover or find the network key for a router wireless (Netgear)

  Network wireless adapter NIC Ethernet network device

  How to recover or find the network key for a router wireless (Netgear)

  Hi RaymondKramp,

  ·         What version of Windows is installed on your computer?

  If you have lost the key to network and not connected to the network, then you can reset the router to factory settings wireless.

  If you lost the key network and connected to the network, and then log on to the Web page of the router and get the key.

  For more assistance, you can contact Netgear Support:

  http://support.NETGEAR.com/app/home

  Hope this information helps.