Any distributed transaction name

Similar Questions

• 8004E00F-COM + unable to speak of Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator

  Hello ALL-
  The displayed error message occurs when you are looking for performance of the system information in computer management.
  I use a brand new Lenovo 410p labtop, Windows 8 OS. No request for heavy trucks has been added.  So far, Windows 8 errors were the only things I 'liked' on a laptop I had for 3 days.  Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
  Thank you!
  Windows error messages are:
  -8004E00F-COM + unable to speak of Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator
  -Try to generate a system health report property values conflict

  -A MS DTC component has encountered an internal error. The process is being completed. Details of the error: DtcSystemShutdown (com\complus\dtc\dtc\msdtc\src\msdtc.cpp@2485): stop with an error

  N ' unable to start the MS DTC transaction manager
  -The MMC stops

  Hi Ryan,

  This is caused by the Service MSDTC (Distributed transaction coordinator) is configured to run under the local system account. It must run under the account NTAuthority\NetworkService instead.

  To resolve this issue, try the following steps.

  Note: Before you perform these steps, please take a backup of the registry. http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-in/Windows7/back-up-the-registry (Steps mentioned in the link can be used for Windows 8 institutions)

  -Press Windows key and press R to open the run prompt and type Regedit.exe , and then on enter to open the registry editor.
  -Locate HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\MSDTC.
  -Right-click on TurnOffRpcSecurity and select Edit. Add the value 1.
  -In the prompt to run, type Services.msc and look for Distributed Transaction Coordinator. Right-click on it and select stop
  -Right-click on the Service and then select Properties. Click the log.
  -Restore the log on the NT Authority\NetworkService account
  -Just type NT Authority\NetworkService
  -the password is empty.
  -Click on apply and Ok
  -Launch Distributed Transaction Coordinator service.

  Restart the computer and check if you still have the problem.

  Measures have been taken from the link http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/dd5515ed-d945-467b-bf34-78e161a1fe5d/server-2003-r2-red-arrow-on-dcom

  Hope this information is useful. If you have any questions, please let us know.

• Error 8004E00F-COM + unable to speak of Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator

  Hello ALL-
  The displayed error message occurs when you are looking for performance of the system information in computer management.
  I use a processor of Pentium 4 Board MSI Windows 8 OS; No request for heavy trucks has been added.  So far, Windows 8 errors were the only things. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
  Thank you!
  Windows error messages are:
  -8004E00F-COM + unable to speak of Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator
  -The event log may contain additional troubleshooting information

  Hi Umesh,

  Please provide the following information.

  When you get this error?

  I suggest you also check the observer of events at the time of the breakup.  The event viewer is an advanced tool that displays detailed information about important events on your computer. It can be useful when troubleshooting problems and errors with Windows and other programs.

  To access the event viewer in Windows 8:

  (a) go to the splash screen. Type in event Viewer .
  (b) this will bring up the box of eventViewer . Click to open Event Viewer.
  (c) in the left pane, expand WindowsLogs.

  Click Applicationlog . Select the first event in the log, and then use the arrow keys to scroll down. Most of your event will be information. Maybe you will see yellow warnings or errors in red. If you see a red error, you can double-click on it to bring it and copy the contents into a document. Copy the complete error message and paste it, so we check the full error message.

  I suggest you follow the steps in the link below.

  Note: before you perform these steps, please take a backup of the registry.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-in/Windows7/back-up-the-registry

  (Steps mentioned in the link can be used for Windows 8 institutions)

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_8-performance/8004E00F-COM-unable-to-talk-to-Microsoft/8066abfe-3396-4635-A900-7115e6d20448

  Alternatively, you can follow the steps below.

  (a) press Windows Key + E.
  (b) open the drive in which you installed Windows 8 operating
  System.
  (c) open the Windows folder. Go to the System32folder------Dtclog folder.
  (d) If a Msdtc.log file exists, rename it to Msdtc.old.
  (e) open Notepad , and then save a blank file in %SystemRoot%\System32\Dtclog\Msdtc.log.
  (f) press the Windows key + Q, type CMD.
  (g) right click on search results, and select run as administrator.

  (h) open a CMD prompt and type: msdtc - resetlog and press enter.

  Hope that solves your problem. We will help you more if you are faced with a
  Difficulty.

• Link Oracle to the Distributed Transaction

  In my application, I have to integrate the system into two (or I would say two separate instances of Oracle databases) through a Java program.
  
  Program to copy data (about 100 records/hour) of an Oracle database instance and the same transfer to another instance of Oracle and Vice versa. Given that this is going to be a lot application stand alone, I thought using the transaction manager distributed as JBOSS TM to control the distributed transaction.
  
  East - the right approach? Or can you suggest a better alternative for this work?

  853627 wrote:
  I agree with your explanation link Oracle, and Yes, it would be ideal to have in this case. For some reason, I have to use the means of Java.

  Why I am using the distributed transaction because I'm following some steps to iterate:

  (1) read A database data,
  (2) move the data to the database B
  (3) after the successful execution of step 1 and 2, there is another table in the database to where I need to mark that some records were migrated to the database "A" to "B".
  (4) after that, I have to update a table with details of migration: number of records to read, end when this routine, any error validation in documents etc...

  Distributed transactions require some complications and level database support.

  But I don't see anything that suggests you need.

  First step is to no basic transactions.

  Single point of failure is between 2 and 3/4. And I suspect that you could handle this with a follow-up to a table.

  (1) start transaction, read data from database A, updated follow-up table, end transaction.
  (2) move the data to the database B
  (3) start Transaction
  (4) after the successful execution of step 1 and 2, there is another table in the database to where I need to mark that some records were migrated to the database "A" to "B".
  (5) (has, without doubt) after that, I have to update a table with details of migration: number of records to read, end when this routine, any error validation in documents etc...
  (6) clean the tracking table
  (7) to complete the transaction.

  If there is a failure, then use the follow-up of knockouts correction table.

• Distributed Transaction Coordinator (DTC) 1073737712 service error code.

  Original title: MSDTC

  Cannot enable Distributed Transaction Coordinator - specific error code-1073737712. All solutions?

  Unless you need to use the DTC Service, I would set it to manual startup or disabled since there is no need to run all day doing nothing.

  Maybe you don't want to not have running or just want to be sure that it will start when you need to start without complaining, then in this case, read this:

  You try to start the Distributed Transaction Coordinator Service (MSDTC) you see a message like this:

  Windows could not start the Distributed Transaction Coordinator on Local computer. For more information, see the system event log. If it is a non-Microsoft service, contact the service vendor and refer to service special-1073737712 error code.

  Look for the events as a present to the Event Viewer Application log:

  Event type: error
  Event source: MSDTC
  Event category: Services
  Event ID: 4163
  Description:
  MS DTC log file not found. After ensuring that all resource managers coordinated by MS DTC have no indoubt transactions, please run msdtc - resetlog to create the log file.

  Event type: error
  Event source: MSDTC
  Event category: disk
  Event ID: 4185
  Description:
  MS DTC transaction manager start failed. LogInit returned error 0 x 2.

  Event type: error
  Event source: MSDTC
  Event category: devices
  Event ID: 4112
  Description:
  Not able to start the MS DTC transaction manager.

  Usually, this means that the file MTDSC.log is missing or corrupt in some way.  The MSDTC log file is usually here so take a look:

  C:\WINDOWS\System32\Msdtc

  To restore and create a new file, MSDTC.log, click Start, run and enter in the box:

  msdtc - resetlog

  Click OK and that will create a new file, MSDTC.log, then see if you can start the MSDTC Service and look for something like this in the case where the monitoring log Application:

  Event type: Information
  Event source: MSDTC
  Event category: disk
  Event ID: 2444
  Description:
  MS DTC is started with the following parameters:

  Security configuration (OFF = 0 and ON = 1):
  Network operations management = 0,
  Network Clients = 0,
  The Distributed Transactions using Native MSDTC inbound protocol = 0,
  Out of Transactions distributed using Native MSDTC = 0 protocol,
  Transaction Internet Protocol (TIP) = 0.
  0 = XA transactions

• Distributed Transaction bug in 12 c Managed pilot?

  I posted previously in Oracle Services for MTS, but I think it's actually more relevant here.

  Attempts to open multiple connections in a result of the Transaction in ORA-12514

  Using a simple call to TransactionScope I was trying 2 different connections in a distributed transaction that provides a single point of success or failure for several operations of the self.

  From the second connection open, bang - ORA-12514, occurs a completely misleading mistake, but take the transaction out of the equation, and it does not, if something was clearly at stake.

  This morning, I put across the right code back to basics to add a simple test:

  using (var ts = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.RequiresNew, new TransactionOptions {IsolationLevel = IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted}, EnterpriseServicesInteropOption.Full)) {
   using (var oc1 = new OracleConnection(_connectionString)) {
         oc1.Open();
         using (var oc2 = new OracleConnection(_quartzString)) {
            oc2.Open();
         }
   }
}

  
  

  The same issue has occurred.  Then I downloaded ILSpy to view the c# language for the Oracle driver, and that's where I noticed that connection pooling seemed to be at the heart of the issue, although she has not commented on it is pretty hard to follow exactly what is happening.

  From what I could tell, when a connection is opened it checks to see if a transaction is running and if so, consult a dictionary of connection strings based on the local identifier of the transaction.  What seems to be the problem, is that which is not allowing new connections being created and added, where it breaks down.  Then I re-tried the same test, but opened and closed the second connection outside the trial * before * creating the transaction like this:

  
  

  var oc3 = new OracleConnection (_connectionString);

  OC3. Open();

  OC3. Close();

  using ()var ts = new TransactionScopeTransactionScopeOption. (), RequiresNew , new TransactionOptions {IsolationLevel = IsolationLevel. } ReadCommitted { }, EnterpriseServicesInteropOption. Full )) {
  to ()var oc1 = new OracleConnection()_connectionString)) { }
  oc1. Open ();
  using (var oc2 = new OracleConnection(_quartzString)) {
  OC2. Open ();
  }
  }
  

  }

  
  

  and guess what - it works... so it looks like there is a problem with connection pooling.

  All my values for the connection are default usual bar (source of data, password) and user id.

  I do not specify a minimum pool size, etc..  I then tried to play with the attributes of the connection pool, but no cigar.

  Turns to me as if it was to see the connections available at the point of the transaction with the context begins registration of connections, but it's probably not good.

  
  

  Someone else had the same experience or a solution?  I was wondering if I'm going to pre-fill connections whenever I want to do a transaction... will try and enable tracing then so I can see the pilot done and why.
  

  You can use SERVICE_NAME instead of SID? If it works, it's confirmed it's the same bug (and you have a work around).

  In fact, I don't think that anyone outside the Oracle can see this particular bug. This bug was discovered in internal tests. These bugs are not publicly exposed as the vast majority occur in the pre-production software, which customers has access to.

  This bug has been recently fixed and merged into the main code line. I don't know that it will be picked up by ODAC R4 12 c due to the timing. However, it should be in an upcoming patch.

• ORA-02074: cannot DEFINE NLS in a distributed transaction

  Short - installation of pre-production

  After Doc ID 1683074.1 for installation quick config, executing a link ' run charts ' task errors and clover logs show the error below:

  08-18 15:08:01, 654 execution [WatchDog] ERROR WatchDog 96200 chart completed with error

  08-18 15:08:01, 658 WatchDog [WatchDog] ERROR 96200 node SET_SESSION_LANGUAGE completed with status: ERROR caused by: ORA-20001: Oracle - 20001 error: ORA-20001: 2074-Oracle error: ORA-02074: cannot DEFINE NLS in a distributed transaction

  has been detected in fnd_global.set_nls.set_parameter ('NLS_LANGUAGE', 'AMERICAN').

  has been detected in fnd_global.set_nls.

  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. APP_EXCEPTION", line 72

  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FND_GLOBAL', line 271

  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FND_GLOBAL', line 1575

  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FND_GLOBAL', line 1603

  ORA-06512: at line 1

  08-18 15:08:01, 658 [WatchDog] WatchDog ERROR 96200 node SET_SESSION_LANGUAGE Error Details:

  java.sql.SQLException: ORA-20001: Oracle - 20001 error: ORA-20001: 2074-Oracle error: ORA-02074: cannot DEFINE NLS in a distributed transaction

  has been detected in fnd_global.set_nls.set_parameter ('NLS_LANGUAGE', 'AMERICAN').

  has been detected in fnd_global.set_nls.

  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. APP_EXCEPTION", line 72

  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FND_GLOBAL', line 271

  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FND_GLOBAL', line 1575

  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FND_GLOBAL', line 1603

  ORA-06512: at line 1

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:445)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:396)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.processError(T4C8Oall.java:879)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.receive(T4CTTIfun.java:450)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.doRPC(T4CTTIfun.java:192)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.doOALL(T4C8Oall.java:531)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CStatement.doOall8(T4CStatement.java:193)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CStatement.executeForRows(T4CStatement.java:1033)

  I discovered the problem.

  I thought he should be a configuration of data source problem. During installation, for some reason, the ebsdb data source is not created on the server of clover, so I added it.

  It's the driver being used. I used the default is generic.

  I've updated the data source "oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver" and restarted the server.

  Looks like it will work now.

• Why Distributed Transaction error at the Message bean but not not Backing Bean?

  Hi guys,.

  * Update * I read the second post first.

  Using JDeveloper 12.1.2.0.0 and integrated WebLogic server of the same version.

  I have an ADF program where a draft of the application using JDBC in a message bean.  If I create an Application Module within the project and then sign in using its connection (java: comp/env/jdbc/MyAdfConnDS), then the code below works fine.  However, if I search connection JDBC (jdbc/MyJdbcDS), I have configured in WebLogic myself, then I distributed transaction errors.  How can I configure my JDBC connection to imitate the one who creates the AppModule?  This way I can run prepared explicitly stated and validation of the call?

  Here is my code JDBC

          conn.setAutoCommit(false);
          PreparedStatement statement = conn.prepareStatement(sql);
          statement.setLong(1, companyAccountId);
  // errors here
          statement.execute();
          conn.commit();
          statement.close();
  
  
  

  Which results in the error

  // prepared statement.
  DELETE BUSINESS_PARTNERS WHERE MASTER_TYPE_KEY = 'C' AND COMPANY_ACCOUNT_ID = ?
  java.sql.SQLException: Cannot call commit when using distributed transactions
              at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.JTAConnection.commit(JTAConnection.java:373)
              at com.sample.myProduct.jms.clients.MyClient.deleteEntities(MyClient.java:211)
              at com.sample.myProduct.jms.clients.MyClient.importData(MyClient.java:155)
              at com.sample.myProduct.jms.beans.ImportMessageBean.onMessage(ImportMessageBean.java:91)
              at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:575)
              at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:477)
              at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:375)
              at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4855)
              at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:4529)
              at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.executeMessage(JMSSession.java:3976)
              at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.access$000(JMSSession.java:120)
              at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:5375)
              at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:550)
              at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:295)
              at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:254)
  
  
  

  Here is a screenshot of all the available drivers: www.williverstravels.com/JDev/Forums/Threads/3544909/drivers.png, as well as the configuration of the transaction screen www.williverstravels.com/JDev/Forums/Threads/3544909/config.png

  I've tinkered enough to feel quite strongly, it is not an error in coding, but rather something in Weblogic.  I read what I can, but I don't know how the AppModule creates connections.  I would not add an AppModule just to retrieve its data source / login information if I don't.

  Ideas?

  Obviously, your message bean is configured to participate in a global transaction (for example, a JTA transaction). It is a behavior of the default message bean, even if you have not explicitly configured. When you get and use a JDBC connection in your message bean, this connection is attached to and participates in the overall transaction message bean (because you used compatible driver Oracle XA, it is seen on the 1st screenshot in your post), so you cannot perform local validation on the JDBC connection.

  Commit / rollback in this case can only be performed on the overall transaction (if the message bean is configured with the transactions managed by container) to be automatically or manually on the UserTransaction object (if the message bean is configured with bean-managed transactions). In other words, you must remove the conn.commit () statement, which is erroneous and obsolete when it is used in your message bean. If the message bean uses transactions managed by container, the container will commit / rollback automatically at the end of the method all the resources involved in the overall transaction (including your JDBC connection). If the method completed successfully (without exception), a validation will be performed. If the method fails (i.e., it ends with an exception), a cancellation will be made. If the message bean uses bean-managed transactions, the transaction is committed/restored when you explicitly call UserTransaction.commit () or UserTransaction.rollback ().

  The code above worked in a managed bean because JSF, ADF BC or ADF Faces applications require and participate in JTA transactions, then your JDBC connection has not been attached to a global transaction and you were able to perform local validation on the JDBC connection.

  You have two options to solve the problem. It depends on if you want your operations of JDBC to be in a global transaction with the bean of the message itself and its other actions or not. If they must be in a global transaction, then just remove the conn.commit () statement from your code. If they shouldn't be in a global transaction, you must either configure the message bean not to participate in global transactions or to configure the data source to use the «of the (thin) Oracle driver...» "instead of"Oracle (XA Thin)... driver. " ». (Remember to score the DataSource DO NOT to participate in a global transaction in the 2nd page of the data source configuration dialog in the management of WLS Console).

  NB. I highly recommend that you keep the global transactions. If you choose not to use a global transaction, it can happen that you committed the JDBC operations but an exception that happens after that, so the JMS message is not removed from the queue of messages and it will be processed after that, which causes the same operations of JDBC to be played and committed twice which must be avoided.

  Dimitar

• ORA-01591: lock held by string of uncertain distributed transaction error

  Hi gurus,
  
  I get the error message
  ORA-01591: lock held by string of uncertain distributed transactions error during the execution of a procedure.
  
  Procedure basically inserts 2 tables and update the 1 table.
  The order of execution is given below.
  However, I get the error as table is locked.
  Can you help me please how to handle this?
  
  
  Begin
  
  Insert into values table_a (nominale1, value2); -(our database)
  
  Insert into table_b@remote_DB values (Value1, value2); -(DISTANCE DB)
  
  Update table C; -(our database)
  
  commit; -When I debugged I get exception with the above sql error in this validation.
  
  End;

  Tina wrote:
  Hi gurus,

  I get the error message
  ORA-01591: lock held by string of uncertain distributed transactions error during the execution of a procedure.

  Procedure basically inserts 2 tables and update the 1 table.
  The order of execution is given below.
  However, I get the error as table is locked.
  Can you help me please how to handle this?

  Begin

  Insert into values table_a (nominale1, value2); -(our database)

  Insert into table_b@remote_DB values (Value1, value2); -(DISTANCE DB)

  Update table C; -(our database)

  commit; -When I debugged I get exception with the above sql error in this validation.

  End;

  01591, 00000, "lock held by in-doubt distributed transaction %s"
  // *Cause:  Trying to access resource that is locked by a dead two-phase commit
  //          transaction that is in prepared state.
  // *Action: DBA should query the pending_trans$ and related tables, and attempt
  //          to repair network connection(s) to coordinator and commit point.
  //          If timely repair is not possible, DBA should contact DBA at commit
  //          point if known or end user for correct outcome, or use heuristic
  //          default if given to issue a heuristic commit or abort command to
  //          finalize the local portion of the distributed transaction.
  

• DatabaseError: ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock

  Hi all
  
  There is no script running in my data base 'A' that will select data from one table to another database via DBLINK and update tables too. The script including 6 I spin for the past 6 monts with success. Yesterday I got the error message saying that,
  
  DatabaseError: ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock
  ORA-02063: preceding the test line
  
  I have tested the link and its assets no problem in DBLINk
  
  I understand the objects which I access the table in locked mode.
  
  SQL > select OBJECT_ID, SESSION_ID, PROCESS, LOCKED_MODE from v$ locked_object where
  SESSION_ID = 121;
  OBJECT_ID SESSION_ID PROCESS LOCKED_MODE
  ---------- ---------- ------------ -----------
  77391 121 21394 3
  
  I have
  I killed the session 121 and in v$ session state is killed, but I get the same error repeated during execution of the script. And the session ID is always in locked_mode.
  
  Might add it please help with that?
  
  -Thank you
  Antony

  This application allows to find the OS process id for your session of people KILLED and to kill him by operating system command.

  Kill - 9 spid

  SELECT a.username, a.osuser, a.terminal, a.program, spid, SID, a.serial #.
  SESSION v$, $ v process b
  WHERE a.paddr = b.addr AND a.status = 'KILLED '.

  Concerning
  Asif Kabir

• ORA-02046: distributed transaction already started

  Hello
  I've written a PL/SQL procedure, which is the insertion of records in a remote table in another database via dblink. First, the procedure works well, but when I try to run once a second, it gives me following error:
  
  ORA-02046: distributed transaction already started
  
  Y at - it a solution or a workaround?
  
  Thanks and greetings

  Please do a favor and give me a small example of this DBMS_SESSION. CLOSE_DATABASE_LINK.

  Here are the ways links could be closed

  (A) that the session that opened the database link can close it...
  Database connection are closed when the session is closed...
  Select * from dba_DB_LINKS---> will show links to database created
  V$ DBLINK will be lists all links data base open and active in your session...

  For an indication of how long the dblink has been opened, run:
  Select s.sid, s.username, s.machine, t.addr, s.status,
  (sysdate - to_date (t.start_time, "MM/DD/YY HH24:MI:SS')) * 24 as hours_active"))
  v $ transaction t, v$ session s
  where t.addr = s.taddr;

  How do I know if a transaction is local or distributed?
  Check v$ global_transaction

  (B) using the ALTER SESSION or explicitly by using the command:

  change the connection to session database ;
  or use the following package:
  DBMS_SESSION.close_database_link ();

  (C) it is also posible to put idle limit user under which connects dblink.
  On the side Server dblink (dblink target) question:

  Create profile Pattente idle limit 5; -5 minutes
  change user profile Pattente test; -According to which the user connects dblink
  ALTER system set resource_limit = true; -must be set to work idle limit
  (or add resource_limit = true init.ora, or both)

  Also check

  DBMS_SESSION. CLOSE_DATABASE_LINK

  Concerning
  Rajesh

• Unable to keep db to the open State, but prevent any new transactions?

  10.2.0.2
  HP - UX 11 x
  
  Hello again. Is it possible to maintain a database in an open State, but not to allow ANY type of transaction to occur?
  My db is based mainly on materialized views. I need to create index on this db, but it immediately forms to open locks.
  
  ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
  
  I've got the sessions marked for kill, but they seem to never go away.
  Options?
  Thank you.
  
  When I go to the session, he declares that he has no current statement being executed. Don't show no '' long. But I still see the locks associated with it.
  I tracked the sid and the n ° of the session series and released the following...
  
  alter system kill session '299,3232';
  and he said:
  ORA_00031: session scored to kill them.
  
  How can I force kill a session abruptly if necessary?
  * found... the alter system kill...... IMMEDIATE;
  
  Published by: Melissa on November 10, 2008 17:06
  
  Published by: Melissa on November 10, 2008 17:06

  Yes, it should work.

• ORA-01591: lock held by the string of uncertain distributed transactions

  Hi all
  
  How to know which application locks the table. That's what I got when I ran the query below.
  
  SQL > SELECT addr, KTUXEUSN, KTUXESLT, KTUXESQN, / * ID of Transaction * /.
  Status KTUXESTA 2,.
  3 flags KTUXECFL
  4. FROM x$ ktuxe
  5. WHERE ktuxesta! = 'INACTIVE '.
  6 AND ktuxeusn = 7;
  
  ADDR KTUXEUSN KTUXESLT KTUXESQN STATE
  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------------
  FLAGS
  ------------------------
  7 35 1672382 PREPARED 5D32920C
  SCO | COL | REV | DEAD
  
  
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  Search the sql text of sid - 11

  SET LINESIZE 500
  SET PAGESIZE 1000
  SET VERIFY OFF
  
  SELECT a.sql_text FROM   v$sqltext a, v$session b
  WHERE  a.address = b.sql_address
  AND    a.hash_value = b.sql_hash_value
  AND    b.sid = &1
  ORDER BY a.piece;
  

  Refer to Metalink 100664.1,401302.1

  Anand

  Published by: Anand, 17 Sep 2010 09:11

• How to identify a session started by a distributed remote transaction?

  1.-j' have DB 11.1.0.7. and I identified one a session started by a remote distributed transaction.
  
  SQL > select username, osuser, status, sid, serial #, machine, process, terminal, program
  session $ v
  where in saddr (select sys.x k2gtdses $k2gte); 2 3
  
  USERNAME OSUSER STATUS SID, SERIAL # MACHINE PROCESS TERMINAL PROGRAM
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------
  RSEGA oracle ACTIVE 354 32817 plm0126mx 14236 oracle@plm0126mx (TNS V1 - V3)
  
  2. - this process was performed from a remote database for a dblink.
  
  -I need to identify
  
  -Remote ORACLE_SID running the process.
  -JOB, TRIGGER, PROCEDURE, remote PACKAGE that executes the process.
  
  Kind regards

  user8039531 wrote:
  I executed the query in due to the distance, but I have 0 lines.

  Kind regards

  Guido

  GUIDO!
  Realize that I am NOT standing behind you.
  Your statement above is 100% completely devoid of exploitable details,
  Since I don't have ANY idea of what specific query refer you.

  Since you did not answer my question,
  I will stop wasting my time trying to answer your questions.

  How can I ask a question in the forums?
  SQL and PL/SQL FAQ

• How can I change the name of vNetwork Distributed Switch?

  vNetwork Distributed Switch name is Test iSCSC. But the esxcfg command recognizes not (single Test). So how can change it to other as test what esxcfg pouvez know or remove the vDS?

  Thank you!

  George

  You can unlink the vmnic of the vDS?

  for example

  esxcfg-vswitch -Q vmnic0 -V  
  

  You should be able to identify the dvPort using esxcfg-vswitch - l, if your dvSwitch has spaces in the name, use quotes around the name of the dvSwitch.

  There is also a pattern of recovery procedure in the documentation of vDS, you can go there if you deleted accidentally networking of your Service Console.

  =========================================================================

  William Lam

  VMware vExpert 2009,2010

  VMware VCP3, 4

  VMware VCAP4-DCA

  VMware scripts and resources at: http://www.virtuallyghetto.com/

  Twitter: @lamw

  repository scripts vGhetto

  Introduction to the vMA (tips/tricks)

  Getting started with vSphere SDK for Perl

  VMware Code Central - Scripts/code samples for developers and administrators

  VMware developer community

  If you find this information useful, please give points to "correct" or "useful".