Archived content that is in the workflow, status review

I archive the content, which is still in the workflow, is not a review, not approved.
If the status of the indexer is presented as "Workflow."
Status review is "Review".

If I create a query with these criteria, the archive is empty.

dReleaseState = 'E' AND dStatus = 'OPINION '.

Query options = "all selected revisions.

I know exactly that he is happy and I should have more than 200 files but exported archiver "0".
Finish. Exports successfully 0 revisions.

What can I do to get around this restriction?

Thx for your help.


By the way... Found Repository Manager content in the workflow. Archiver is not.

Edited by: travillion on 18.09.2012 10:25

Sorry, but this is the correct and expected. You cannot export any items currently in an active workflow.

This excerpt comes from 10g documentation, but it applies to 11g. (He has been this way for many, many years.)

You can export revisions that have a status of RELEASED, DONE, EXPIRED and GENWWW. You cannot export revisions that are in an active workflow (revision, EDITING or pending status) or which are DELETED.

A big reason is that there is a bit of additional data on the document and the associated workflow process itself that archive simply cannot capture and migrate.

It is much simpler to just complete the workflow before attempting to migrate the data.

Tags: Fusion Middleware

Similar Questions

  • NDP project - Check for a field before the next the workflow status

    Hello

    Is it possible to have a similar feature as the conditions of custody (for GSM, SCRM) in a NDP project?.

    I need to check the value of a field before moving on to the next step. I know that there may be some validations customized when you save the project, but I would like to know if it is possible to check the value of a field before moving to the State / the next step.

    Thanks in advance,

    Fernando

    Hi Fernando,

    We support validation on the events of Workflow in a NDP project. If you have installed the pack of the EP, go to \ReferenceImplementations\Validation\Documentation\Validation Objects.xls, you will see a detailed list of events, type ID and so on.

    I don't know what validation you want to put in place, here, I have an example you can make reference to:

    1, add the following to Config\Extensions\ValidationSettings.xml:

    2, restart the iis services

    3, go to one project NDP, erase the data in field of brands, save the project, no error

    workflow 4, this project, error "property marks is required."

    '

    I hope this helps.

    Thank you

    Jessie

  • How can I alt tag button table of contents that appears at the top of the menu?

    Running the latest version of the Cp7 on a windows machine 7.

    A 508 hang up once more: the customer insists on an active table of contents for the project file. We have activated the TOC and it works fine, but there is a collapsible TOC secondary button located at the top of the slide here:

    1.PNG

    Although I can change the icon for the TOC expand/collapse in the setting of the table of contents menu:

    2.PNG

    I can't put a the button alt tag, which means that JAWS and other screen just readers it reads as a button without a name - which would be 'bad' If you try to pass a test of 508 compliance - who I am. I know that alt tags do not travel with the image file, and I can't find any way to access the file in Captivate to give him a name of accessibility. Someone at - it a solution?

    Justenuf

    You can replace the current picture with one of your choice.  But even if you replace just one pixel GIF, I think that it will always record somewhere in the screen as a button reader.

    However, to be fair to Captivate, you can use the table of contents button on the playback bar to activate the table of contents if need be, or you can configure the buttons on the screen to do so.

    Personally, I wouldn't be way to recovery TOC at all.  I would try for a table of contents separate so that it did not have all the time.

    However, I had read somewhere on this forum (a year or two back) about someone of another conclusion that the links in the table of contents itself were not fully 508 compliant.  Then perhaps you're just chasing your tail here if you try to achieve perfect 508 compliance.

  • Calculate the values of a SharePoint workflow status Page column lines

    On the workflow status page, how can I have a column with a value in the column lines?  My workflow page lists commands that are in the workflow.  I wish there was a column where the value of each PO, displays a running total of the PO rises before him.

    Hello

    It is not a community forum for issues of SharePoint. Please post to the appropriate

    Forum on MSDN SharePoint.

    http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/SharePoint/en-us/home

    Don

  • Unable to run the workflow using Startprocess?

    I created the button in the form. When I click on the button, I have to do my workflow to run. In the trigger pressed the button, I called the procedure
    Initiate_workflow with the code below.

    PROCEDURE INITIATE_WORKFLOW (V_REF_NO IN NUMBER)
    AS
    NUMBER OF L_SEQ;
    BEGIN
    SELECT XXWFBLKSEQ. NEXTVAL
    IN L_SEQ
    FROM DUAL;

    WF_ENGINE. CREATEPROCESS ('TRIALWF', L_SEQ |) » -'|| V_REF_NO, 'TRIALPROCESS');


    UPDATE XXWFBLOCK_I SET ITEMTYPE = "TRIALWF", ITEMKEY = L_SEQ | » -'|| V_REF_NO, STATUS = "WAITING WITH MFG DEPT'"
    WHERE TABNO = V_REF_NO;

    WF_ENGINE. STARTPROCESS ('TRIALWF', L_SEQ |) » -'|| V_REF_NO);

    COMMIT;
    END INITIATE_WORKFLOW;

    Update took place in the xxwfblock_I of the table, but the workflow started.

    What is the error? Am new to the workflow.
    Suggest me with the solution.




    Kind regards
    Mini

    Well, if there was a mistake, it would have error message in place on the form.

    How do you know that the workflow is not started?
    It is possible that even if the workflow is started you will not be able to see unless you have access to see her, please query the table of wf_items with your item_type and item_key if you find an entry in this table, so your workflow is started.

    -Tom

  • Content Server error on rejecting content into the workflow of the author

    Scenario:
    1 subject author for proofreading to approver and piece of content
    2. approver rejects content returned to author of changes
    3. the author may approve/reject changes. Here author rejects content item
    4. the rejection, he lifts Content Server Error as follows:

    Content Server request failed
    Impossible to dismiss the element of content 'ABC' in the workflow "testworkflow. The content item is in a stage of type "Revision AutoContribute/Edit" and does not support a control action.



    Thank you

    First of all remember that an author MAY dismiss his element in any stage except stage of initial contribution. If he landed all the way there, it is, in essence, saying he has nothing else to do other than return such what to another chance for approval OR rewriting, then return it to reject the previous reviewer comments.

    The fact that it is in the workflow (that is, the initial entry criteria) have not changed then presumably he EXPECTED to be there.

    If you have something like a workflow ideabox where to submit people ideas, ideas to approve/reject reviewers and reporters can rewrite/tweak these ideas or kill ideas, then you'll want to make additional scripts.

    For example, that I submit an idea to start creating blue widgets. The examiner rejects and says: 'no. "purple or red ONLY. I can order and update my proposal to the idea of saying 'create purple widgets' and then pass it back to the examiner, OR I can kill my idea all together (I'm an enemy of purple). In order to kill my idea, I'm going to need to do extra scripts. Here, there are a lot of options.

    I could write code in the input event of the first step of the workflow (i.e. after the step of autocontribute) which focuses on the entry step count variable. If this variable is > 2 I can remove the element (or release her and mark it for deletion or archiving, or other). I could create a workflow of void based on metadata values that I update, I could do any number of things. Basically, you want to make your conditional processing in any stage EXCEPT the autocontribute.

    The BEST option by far is to trap all emissions in the first stage of creation of the workflow, so you can treat it as you like - rather than having to deal with him at the autocontribute stage.

    hope that helps,
    Warmly,.
    Billy Cripe
    Fishbowl Solutions

  • How to configure the workflow to keep revisions of the content?

    Hi experts,



    I'm newbie here.


    My question is I want to keep revisions of the content when there are rejected during the workflow...


    At first, I define a workflow so that only the author can access read/write, until other artist are read-only.
    Then start the workflow, and the second player rejects the workflow. ... However, the workflow task refers to the author, and the author removes the document. When the author has reviewed the document and checked again (use a different filename at check-in), the new document replaced the original without any version (expect that there is a version 1.0 document (original) and a document of version 1.1 (new arrival), the two original author rule edit = edit revision and revision have been tried,)

    Finally, they have not generated new version for the new check-in.

    Please advice.

    16Challenge9 wrote:
    Hi experts,

    I'm newbie here.

    My question is I want to keep revisions of the content when there are rejected during the workflow...

    At first, I define a workflow so that only the author can access read/write, until other artist are read-only.
    Then start the workflow, and the second player rejects the workflow. ... However, the workflow task refers to the author, and the author removes the document. When the author has reviewed the document and checked again (use a different filename at check-in), the new document replaced the original without any version (expect that there is a version 1.0 document (original) and a document of version 1.1 (new arrival), the two original author rule edit = edit revision and revision have been tried,)

    Finally, they have not generated new version for the new check-in.

    Please advice.

    Here are the steps that I tried and it works very well:
    1 has created a workflow of CRITERIA in the Admin workflow named 'test '. I checked 'original author Edit rule' as 'new revision '.
    2. defined as the definition of criteria such as the author of 'sysadmin '. This means that all files that the user sysadmin Archive enters the workflow.
    3. added a 'Step 1' stage with the verified following radio button "users can consider the revision course or create new revisions".
    4. Add a user as "sysadmin". It's the author who can change/update the file.
    5. now, added "Step 2' with the following checked radio button"users can see the revision underway". Add a guest user "user1".
    6.now, enabled the workflow.

    You can try this.

  • "Do you want to view only the webpage content that was delivered safely. "the Web page content that willl be sent using a secure HTTPS connection, which could jeopardize the securityof the entire Web page.

    Original title: SECURITY WARNING

    When I try to open a program I have getthis message:

    "Do you want to view only the webpage content that was delivered safely.

    "the Web page content that willl be sent using a secure HTTPS connection, which could jeopardize the securityof the entire Web page.

    Is this something that needs to be corrected?  If yes how.

    Hi billkabay,

    (1) program which you are referring?

    (2) is the problem confined to this specific programme?

    (3) since when are you facing this problem?

    This problem normally occurs when you open Web pages in internet explore. Please specify if this happens when you open a program or opening a Web page or link in internet explore.

    You can see the steps in the link below

    https://community.dynamics.com/product/crm/crmtechnical/b/crminogic/archive/2009/07/09/how-to-disable-the-34-do-you-want-to-view-only-the-webpages-content-that-was-delivered-securely-63-popup-for-custom-pages-added-to-crm.aspx

    Also see the steps by Vincenzo Di Russo (check the post Saturday, May 30, 2009 11:36) in the link below.

    http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/InternetExplorer/thread/e7526a5f-F953-4235-90c3-004f9b973585

    Thanks and greetings

    Ajay K

    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
    ***************************************************************************
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • While surfing... dialogue security https sites apperas "do you want to view only the webpage content that was delivered safely?

    While surfing... Security https sites apperas to dialogue "do you want to view only the webpage content that was delivered safely. It irritates a lot. Since then, he's waiting for Yes/No. How to avoid it? Thanks and best regards yeshsoft

    Hello

    Add the e-mail to each site Page to IE - Tools - Internet Options - Security tab - Trusted Sites

    If necessary, you can then you can click on the tab Security - Sites trust - custom level and change
    parameters for sites that will be treated separately from the other Trusted Sites No. You
    can experiment if necessary as it is a default button reset it as well. Do not forget to
    APPLY / OK any changes.

    You can also get to security settings - then Trusted Sites quickly by double-clicking the blue
    Globe on the lower part of IE in the central section, where it is said - Internet | Protected mode
    on the status bar (you can double-click on any part of this article).
     
    I hope this helps. Rob - bicycle - Mark Twain said it is good.

  • Is it possible to archive similar sourcing approvals of how GSM specifications can be masked by the tag spec hidden in the workflow

    We would like a way to hide the sourcing of the approvals that have reached a specific State of the workflow.

    Similar to the way it is done in GSM.

    Is it possible in one of the new versions?


    Basically you create a tag from visibility in ADMN, tag approved sourcing or statutes of specification in the WFA, then associate tags with user groups in the UGM.   If you can do things like, only R & D can see sheet formulation in 'project' and 'revision', so that everyone can see formulations in 'approved '.    This feature gives you more options that just the GSM hide spec unique tag.   Its really the feature 'Hide Spec' next generation.

    You can create a tag called "Hide SA" and then associate this tag to archived step sourcing of approval in the WFA.   Once labeled only users in a group associated with the tag "Hide SA" can see these approvals sourcing.

    We have a white paper which should help explain how to set tags visibility upwards.  Check it out here:

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E29563_13/OTN/PDF/whitepapers/E29319_01.PDF

    Let me know if you have any questions.

  • Status for the workflow IN. monitor say complete workflow with errors

    Hello

    I changed the PO notification by changing the associated plsql package. Now when I see IN. notices in the notification window it display correctly.

    When I search the same PO in State control in charge of workflow administrator, I get the following error.
    =============================
    [WF_ERROR] ERROR_MESSAGE = 3835: error '-20002 - ORA-20002: 2018: impossible to generate the XML notification. Caused by: 2020: error getting to content of the notification. Caused by: ORA-04061: current status of has been invalidated ORA-04061: current state of the package body 'APPS '. PO_WF_PO_NOTIFICATION"has been invalidated ORA-04065: not executed, altered or abandoned the package body"APPS. PO_WF_PO_NOTIFICATION' ORA-06508: PL/SQL: called program unit is not found: 'APPS. PO_WF_PO_NOTIFICATION' wf_notification. GetAttrDoc2 (2975647, ACTION_HISTORY, text/html)' encountered during execution of the function Generate ' WF_XML. Generate ' event 'oracle.apps.wf.notification.send '. ERROR_STACK = WF_MAIL. GetLOBMessage3 (2975647, WFMAIL, 2020: error getting notification content.) Caused by: ORA-04061: current status of has been invalidated ORA-04061: current state of the package body 'APPS '. PO_WF_PO_NOTIFICATION"has been invalidated ORA-04065: not executed, altered or abandoned the package body"APPS. PO_WF_PO_NOTIFICATION' ORA-06508: PL/SQL: called program unit is not found: 'APPS. PO_WF_PO_NOTIFICATION' wf_notification. GetAttrDoc2(2975647, ACTION_HISTORY, text/html) Wf_Notification.GetAttrDoc(2975647, ACTION_HISTORY, text/html) Wf_Notification.GetText(2975647, text/html) Wf_Notification.GetBody(2975647, text/html) WF_NOTIFICATION. GetFullBody(nid => 2975647, disptype => text/html) WF_MAIL. GetLOBMessage3(nid => 2975647, r_ntf_pref => MAILHTML), step-> text/html body layout) WF_XML. GenerateDoc(oracle.apps.wf.notification.send, 2975647) WF_XML. Generate(Oracle.apps.WF.notification.Send, 2975647) WF_XML. Generate(Oracle.apps.WF.notification.Send, 2975647) Wf_Event.setMessage(oracle.apps.wf.notification.send, 2975647, WF_XML.) Generate) Wf_Event.dispatch_internal)
    =============================

    How can I make sure workflow completed without error.

    Thanks in advance

    957031 wrote:
    How can thanks for the useful update, I perform steps below

    1. stop the sender of the Notification and the workflow delayed Notification Agent listener
    -How can I shutdown Notification Mailer and deferred Workflow Notification Agent listener

    see the MOS note:
    Workflow Java Mailer & Notifications FAQ [ID 562551.1]
    and http://docs.oracle.com/cd/A60725_05/html/comnls/us/fnd/fndwfmal.htm

    2nd recompile the applications through ADADMIN schema
    -What are we by schema recompile APPS through ADADMIN, do what this means we must compile all invalid objects of the apps schema.

    check
    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/A97501_01/Acrobat/11iadutil.PDF

    Thank you

  • delete the contents of the workflow

    I received a request to remove the contents of the workflow.
    If the content is rejected, we always want to save if needed later.

    So my plan was to change the type of contect and approve the content.

    But the only way I can see to approve, is to go to the active workflow and approval stages.
    E-mails are sent to approvers to each step. I would avoid the email of workflow for items in these locations.

    Thank you

    You cannot refresh SG during WF criteria. So forget that one.

    Why not use the event to update in the Windows Firewall to monitor a specific indicator to be defined in the metadata - for example xWithdrawFromWorkflow if the value is true (in a patch) and then use the wfExit function to get out of the WF immediately without approval. Otherwise there is little to separate a real pleasure of an approval which took place just to get an element of WF.

    Tim

  • Is there any way I can remove to concede Mozilla non exclusive, free of charge, worldwide license to use the content that I can download using Sync?

    I started to download Mozilla Sync to my computer, but stopped after reading an article in the terms of use. He States, "5. Your content in our Services: you can download content as part of the functionality of the Services. By downloading the content, you grant us hereby an exclusive, royalty-free license throughout the world to use your content in the context of the provision of Services. "Take you represent and warrant that your content will not infringe the rights of any third party and that it will comply with any content directive introduced by Mozilla ', so I stopped the download until I could learn more.
    I also think that your privacy under the heading synchronization policy says that Mozilla will strive to keep my content only as needed. If this is the case then by two distinct statements in your terms and conditions Privacy policy, you may deem it "necessary" to keep all my content that you want to use.
    My question is this, is it possible to deny the exclusive, royalty-free license throughout the world to use my content that I can download using your service of the Mozilla? "I will not be forced to allow anyone this type of license to use my art or writing ' ad arbitrium".

    IIRC, section 5 is basically guaranteeing that you are the real owner of the content that is uploaded to Sync, and that Mozilla is not going to get justice for copyright infringement, the content that you download is safe, and the terms are for a "license to use your content in the framework of the provision of Services' not even Mozilla can access.

  • What standard, if any, specifies how a browser responds to a type of content that is specified by the attribute 'type' of the anchor tag?

    I had hoped that the following HTML code would FORCE the browser responds to the anchor when dealing with content in plain text: < a href = "file:path" type = "text/plain" > anchor text < /a >. Similarly: < a href = "file:path" type = "text/html" >... < /a > should FORCE the browser to treat the reference that responded to the questionnaire in the HTML code. Firefox does this (good for you!). However, Google Chrome and Internet Explorer seem to ignore the given content type and process the response according to but they feel (which seems to be based on the file extension). I was hoping to find a standard that describes how a browser handles content specified by source type. I looked at the W3C html and http standards and have not yet find no applicable description or condition. Obviously, I'm looking for a way to encode the source file so that when the anchors are observed, they appear as I want them to be. I can not change the content of the file destination (or name) - which is already determined by its own needs.

    Hi asicchecker, about what is 'necessary', did you follow the links in the gingerbread man?

    This is the most direct:

    HTML 4.01: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.2

    HTML5: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#attr-hyperlink-type (ditto)

    DND: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/a#attr-type

  • AT &amp; T changed their design of the homepage, and I liked the old one. A way to create my own homepage in Firefox using modules for content that I prefer?

    AT & T changed their design of the homepage, and I liked the old one. A way to create my own homepage in Firefox using modules for content that I prefer? I liked the modules which gave me a variety of sources of news, finance, sports, weather, calendar, etc... It also allowed me to use a background of my own source. Finally, he allowed me to resize the modules I needed. I would like to be able to replace the new AT & T with my own homepage. Thank you.

    Maybe http://www.netvibes.com/

Maybe you are looking for