Aurora R4 Samsung 850 Pro

Similar Questions

• W550s error code POST 2100 with Samsung 850 Pro 1 TB

  Someone had the POST 2100 error code after I installed a Samsung 850 Pro in the W550s?

  I had this happen when I tried to install the Samsung and did a restart hot. The machine should start properly if I completely stopped down but not with reboots.

  The hotfix that is described in the following link corrects this problem for Samsung 850 Pro 1 TB?

  http://support.Lenovo.com/us/en/documents/ht082504

  Using Acronis True Image instead of data Migration Samsung worked like a charm. Samsung costs me a lot of time and frustration with their migration software.

  They should be upfront with the fact that SDM v2.7 does not work with a Lenovo W550s. They are stuck in NIH (not invented here).

  Moreover, I fArrondi that Acronis True Image can cause serious system problems if allowed to run at startup and run in the background. It causes the system freezes in one of my computers. I used Windows 7 msconfig to disable at startup and it will run only when I need it.

• Solid State drive Samsung 850 Pro

  I want to add an SSD Samsung 850 Pro for a HP Pavilion Elite e9280t intel i7 - 920 (2.66 ghz, 1 MB L2 + 8 MB of cache shared N3), 2 TB 7200 RPM / min SATA 3 gb/s - two 1 TB hard drives. An SSD will work with my setup?  Thank you Gary

  Hello

  The e9280t of HP has only SATA II ports, so all SATA III SSD will not reach its full performance potential.  A more cost-effective alternative is to look at the EVO of 840 Samsung which is very popular in many magazines of the PC industry. I know that the Samsung 840 EVO works on your PC.  Watch a 250 GB or more large model.

• EliteBook 850 G1: Elitebook 850 G1 and Samsung 850 PRO 512 GB SSD

  Hello

  I recently bought a new Elitebook 850 G1 a retailer authorized HP here in Germany. It turns out be a very fine machine so far.

  Just a little thing I noticed is the following:

  I exchanged the original 250 GB SSD (A Samsung 840) supplied with the notebook for a Samsung 850 PRO 512 GB SSD.

  It made me lose the UEFI chart UI system diagnosis. Only the base system diagnostics are available (similar to BACK black and white screen).

  Apparently BIOS EliteBook doesn't "recognize" the PRO 850 as supported even if the player works absolutely fine in laptop computer, running a new installation of Windows Pro 64 bit smoothly 8.1.

  Is there some sort of whitelist of device in the BIOS? Is it possible to get other permutation Diagnostics advanced system back to the original SSD? Maybe some update BIOS?

  Already, I run the latest BIOS of G1 EliteBook 850 as available by HP driver and download Web site.

  Not that this is a crucial issue given that the laptop works well, but it's kind of worries me nonetheless.

  Thanks for responding.

  Diagnostics UEFI advanced is actually contained in a service partition on the hard drive so unless you cloned all partitions on the old disk you may have failed. Fortunately, it can be downloaded and installed on the hard drive or you can even make a thumb drive bootable UEFI.

  http://h20564.www2.HP.com/hpsc/SWD/public/detail?sp4ts.Oid=5405106&swItemId=ob_125304_1&swEnvOid=4158

  If it's 'the Answer' please click on 'Accept as Solution' to help others find it.

• Slow writes PERC H700 and Samsung 850 PRO SSD

  I saw several posts about this, but don't see a solution.

  I have a few servers R710 with H700 controllers. I have installed Samsung 1 TB SSD Pro 850 and see writing very slow compared to other performance SSD tested in one box, simply slow in general. SAMSUNG SSD are ~ 500 MB/s in both sense when connected to the stand-alone desktop computer, but ~ 500 MB/s read and ~ 45 MB/s, writes when it is connected to a server.

  1. 1 x SSD in RAID 0 - no redundancy, just to test the performance. I tried all combinations of memory cache writeback and read before possible setting (enabled, disabled) and has never had more than ~ 45 MB/s, writing.

  2. 6 x SSD in RAID 5 with all possible combinations of never getting write cache over ~ 110 MB/s, writing.

  3. 6 x SSD in RAID 10 yet one time all possible settings of the writeback cache - ~ 140 MB/s.

  Finally, I installed 120 GB Intel SSD and got more than 400 Mbps in both directions without worrying about the RAID or cached.

  What is the problem with the H700 and Samsung SSD controllers? No one knows how to fix?

  Any other R710 compatible controller, which do not have this problem? Might be able, JBOD? I also tried a stop the controller PCIe Board without a bit of luck (bottom of basket or any compatibility issues)

  Thanks in advance.

  P. S.

  The controller is a latest firmware and the BIOS and other components. Used Dell Repository Manager iDRAC discovery and the ISO bootable to update everything.

  SAMSUNG SSD are on a latest firmware as well.

  Hello.

  The Samsung 850 Pro SSD are not validated or certified to work with controllers from Dell, and as such, there is an incompatibility of communication between readers and the controller at the firmware level. Thus, you are required to achieve the unexpected poor read and write performance regardless of the controller cache settings. Consider using Dell certified readers.

  Thank you.

• Samsung 850 Pro Setup

  Hi, I'm about to buy the Samsung 850 Pro and I was wondering if because of the speed and the remarkable ability to read/write, yet should I separate projects, media etc. to multiple disks cache?  Is it really benefit more?

  I was able to get 2 and have

  1 operating system and programs

  2. projects of media exportm cache, etc. (stuff all first)

  Or get 3 and

  1 operating system and programs

  2. the projects, media

  3. the export, cache of media previews

  I won't be wasting money

  In addition, the REST of your computer determines if adding this SSD will be of no benefit. If all components are low, it can not be helped at all. We need to know that you have the hardware and what material you want to change. The version of the body you use is also important. Generally, a 850 Pro with just the OS, programs and pagefile on this issue, MORE a second 850Pro for everything is a good start. A level of the great company, fast HARD drive can be added for backup and archiving. many work more than 200 Mbps. these days. You need because the space on the SSD dear is so small.

• I can't install windows 8.1 SSD samsung 850 Pro for my AW18 because this error:

  I bought a new SSD Samsung 850 Pro to my Alienware 18. When I try to install the windows 8.1 and selected the SSD to install the Sagna appear the error:

  "Windows has detected that the EFI system partition is formatted as NTFS. Format the EFI in FAT32 system partition, then restart the installation. »

  Start of the motherboard as: AHCI

  Hi csarquiteto,

  You will need to format the disk partitions in order to install the operating system. Just follow the detailed instructions in this video , and when you get to the screen that says where you want to install Windows?, select the old partitions and delete them (This erases all data from the partition also), then create a new to complete the installation.

  Let me know how it goes!

• What to choose? Samsung 850 pro or Photoshop pro 950 m2.

  I'm going to build my new PC, and the focus is Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator. I on side projects such as Cinema4D, Adobe Premiere and After effects. It will be a processor 6800K, a GTX 1070 (for some extra fun in spare time) and 32 GB of memory.

  I'm still nog certain to do the 850 or 950 m2 pro pro for my OS and programs.

  On paper and in the benchmarks, the 950 pro is destroying every SSD out there. But the downside is the Heath and the price.

  Second and this is my main question... you will see the difference between the 950 pro and the 850 pro when you make large files. For example, I was working in a digital painting 14FR. It's a spectacular size that would be printed for large windows. It was horrible to work in this file and it took me a lot of extra time, waiting on the computer.

  -What is the 950 pro worth his money or doe that speed up my work in just a few seconds?

  I hope someone can help out me.

  Roy

  When you work with large files, you must make sure that there is no I/O bottlenecks anywhere. In other words, you need a balanced system. I don't know what an SSD marginally more fast, by itself, will make much difference.

  First of all you need of enough RAM (32-128 GB) and a record of effective working configuration. If your system SSD has sufficient free capacity - and you need a lot for these filesizes, 100-150 GB at least - the fastest configuration is to have scratches on your system disk. With spinning disks, it is advisable to have zero on a separate disk.

  If you want maximum speed of I/O you might consider RAIDing two or more SSD, but then you must also have a separate RAID controller. Not sure if it is worth.

  FWIW, I have a 500 GB 850 as my system disk, using an i7-3820 and 32 GB of RAM. It works well for large files, I regularly work on the panos of 30 000 pixels or so without any problem. However, I would like to make a separate 240GB SSD set up for scratch, mainly to avoid wear on the system drive.

• BSOD with a new samsung 850

  Separated from this thread.

  Hi, I have recently updated my laptop with a new samsung 850 pro 1 TB ssd and installed windows 7 from the original disc supplied with the computer, I constantly get blue screen and error of mini dump. I can't understand that drivers or what is the cause.

  I download the program from nirsoft bluescreenview but do not understand.

  Here's what I could download

  https://onedrive.live.com/redir?RESID=732BA0FD6B6EEB97! 44731 & authkey =! ANCd-X18lOgoAj0 & ithint = % 2cdmp

  OM

  2 different BSOD codes (a releated to USB).  Please run the Driver Verifier to find the underlying issue

  These accidents were related to the corruption of memory (probably caused by a driver).

  Run these two tests to check your memory and find which driver is causing the problem.  Please run first check
  

  If you are overclocking anything reset by default before running these tests.
  In other words STOP!

  If you don't know what it means that you're probably not

  
  

  
  1-Driver Verifier (for full instructions, see our wiki here)

  2-Memtest. (You can learn more about running memtest here)

  
  

  
  

• The EVO 840 will limit the potential of the 850 Pro in this configuration?

  Consider the following configuration for use with Adobe first Pro CC 2014 after effects CC 2014 (I would especially rendering/export to .mp4 or h.264 using AVCHD source media):

  Motherboard: MSI X99S game 7

  OS: Windows 8.1 Pro

  CPU: Intel 5960 x (cache 8 core 3.0 ghz, 20 MB)

  GPU: SLI GTX 970 s 2

  RAM: 32 GB

  SSD:

  Samsung 250 840 EVO for OS, swap file and programs

  1 TB Samsung 850 Pro for media Cache, export, Original/Source of media files, shows previews and projects.

  Given the above configuration, the EVO 840, in any form or means, would limit the potential of the 850 pro during any type of export/rendering/reading?  I doubt it because most of the work is done on the 1 to 850 Pro, but I don't really know for sure.  Considering that the application itself should be read and works on the Pro 840, I really don't know if it will be potentially bottleneck Pro 850 during these crucial processes.  Can someone point me directly here?  In addition to this, is there another way recommend you allocating the types of different files in the above configuration?

  wastingyourlifeaway wrote:

  That's just my assumption.  Where I am wrong, or is this correct?  To use the true benefits of the 850 Pro, installed on the SSD applications should also be a 850 Pro?

  Sorry to say but you are wrong, but it's good.  When you open the first or any application, it extends memory RAM, so let your applications on the EVO drive.

• Still slow after Samsung SSD Pro 850

  I recently installed Samsung SSD 850 pro on my mbp 2012. There is no significant difference in its speed before and after. Application of test of speed magic Black Watch reading and writing speeds both somewhere between 40 - 60 MB/s. If disappointing! I'm not a tech guy but there might be people out there who have experienced this problem and have regained hope. If you know a solution please share.

  This is the Office Mac Pro forum. I asked that your post moved to the forum of laptop MacBook Pro or another appropriate forum.

• Samsung 850 EVO Solid State Drive works only with the MacBook Pro - Solution?

  I recently bought a Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB Solid State Drive for mid 2012 MacBook Pro father. The computer was working properly, but it was just very slow. I took the old drive and installed the SSD. I took it to an Apple store so that they could install the OS. A guy at the Genius Bar met with me and first tried to install the OS via the Ethernet cable. It is impossible to install some general error. He then tried to install it on a disc. Which also failed. He said he was not familiar with the type of error that he saw. But he said it was a mistake 'bad '. He said he saw the SSD for my SATA cable worked. He concluded that the reader must be defective. I explained how it is virtually impossible because they have a rate of close to zero. He said: "well they are produced en masse" and explained how they could install a hard drive themselves for some too expensive price. A bit annoying.

  In any case, I took the SSD back to my house and threw it in my desktop PC. It works very well. Then what should I do? Why am I not able to get the SSD to install it? From what I read, the Samsung 850 EVO should be compatible with a MacBook Pro 2012. Can I do to install it at home? Is that all I can say people at the Mac store to help them along?

  Most likely, the drive is formatted for use with Windows computers. First step would be to format correctly for Macs.

  This is Mac OS extended (journaled) with a GUID partition map.

  OS X will only be installed on a properly formatted disk.

  HTH

  Leo

• 2009 Mac Pro is plant after the boot Samsung 850 Evo 250 GB drive upgrade

  The system seems to hang mysteriously every two weeks. It restarts every time login screen. I tried to run DiskWarrior 5.0 on the system, but it doesn't seem to help.

  I've been thinking out the disc and its replacement with an OWC (mercury Accelsior E2) or a conventional hard drive. Another option could be upgraded to the latest OS X Server 5.0.3.

  2009 mac Pro

  Mac OS X Server 10.6.8 - stock (no Trim Enabler)

  8-core 2.26 GHz, 6 GB RAM, nVidia GeForce GT 120

  Highpoint RocketRAID 2314

  Interval since the last report of panic: 734359 sec

  Panic since the last report: 1

  Anonymous UUID: E2906FE3-AD37-43A4-9D1C-5D313A9E42B5

  Fri Jan 15 20:55:31 2016

  panic (the appellant 2 cpu 0xffffff7f80cc8b4d): "AppleAHCI: location (0) reused, newFIS = 0xaaef8027: 0x00000000: 0x00000000: 0x00000000, currentFIS = x 0 00358027: 0x403cb6a0: 0x00000000: 0x00000010, PxCl = 0x00000000 PxSact = 0x00000000\n"@/SourceCache/AppleAHCI/AppleAHCI-217.0.5/AppleAHCIPort.cpp:2801.

  Backtrace (2 CPU), Frame: Return address

  0xffffff8087943b00: 0xffffff8000204d15

  0xffffff8087943c00: 0xffffff7f80cc8b4d

  0xffffff8087943c90: 0xffffff800053c225

  0xffffff8087943d00: 0xffffff7f80cc71b9

  0xffffff8087943da0: 0xffffff7f80cbce8d

  0xffffff8087943dd0: 0xffffff7f80cbd29a

  0xffffff8087943e50: 0xffffff7f8117325d

  0xffffff8087943e90: 0xffffff7f811738e9

  0xffffff8087943eb0: 0xffffff7f8117348c

  0xffffff8087943ed0: 0xffffff7f811768f0

  0xffffff8087943f60: 0xffffff8000285b66

  0xffffff8087943fa0: 0xffffff80002c8527

  Extensions of kernel in trace (with dependencies):

  com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIBlockStorage (1.6.4) @0xffffff7f8116e000-> 0xffffff7f81182ff f

  dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily (2.0.6) @0xffffff7f80cbb000

  dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOStorageFamily (1.6.3) @0xffffff7f80d59000

  com.apple.driver.AppleAHCIPort (2.1.7) @0xffffff7f80cc2000-> 0xffffff7f80cd8fff

  dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily (2.0.6) @0xffffff7f80cbb000

  dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily (2.6.5) @0xffffff7f8081d000

  com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily (2.0.6) @0xffffff7f80cbb000-> 0xffffff7f80cc1fff

  Corresponding to the current thread BSD process name: kernel_task

  Mac OS version:

  10K 549

  Kernel version:

  10.8.0 Darwin kernel version: kills Jun 7 16:32:41 PDT 2011; root:XNU-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_X86_64

  Name of system model: MacPro4, 1 (Mac-F221BEC8)

  Availability of the system in nanoseconds: 130647334321206

  discharged kexts:

  com.apple.driver.AppleIntel8254XEthernet 2.1.3b1 (0xffffff7f80f07000 addr, size 0 x 118784) - last unloaded 87066847159

  kexts responsible:

  com Highpoint - tech.kext.HighPointRR 1.1.1

  com.apple.driver.AppleHWSensor 1.9.3d0 - last load 26409548610

  com Apple.nke.PPTP 1.5

  com Apple.nke.L2TP 1.5

  com Apple.filesystems.autofs 2.1.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleTyMCEDriver 1.0.2d2

  com.apple.driver.AGPM 100.12.31

  com.apple.driver.AppleMikeyHIDDriver 1.2.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleUpstreamUserClient 3.5.7

  com.apple.driver.AppleMCCSControl 1.0.20

  com.apple.driver.AppleHDA 2.0.5f14

  com.apple.driver.AppleMikeyDriver 2.0.5f14

  com.apple.driver.AudioAUUC 1.57

  6.3.6 com.apple.GeForce

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBOpticalMouse 3.7.5

  com.apple.Dont_Steal_Mac_OS_X 7.0.0

  com.apple.driver.AudioIPCDriver 1.1.6

  com.apple.driver.AppleIntelNehalemProfile 11

  com.apple.driver.ACPI_SMC_PlatformPlugin 4.7.0a1

  com.apple.driver.AppleLPC 1.5.1

  com.apple.driver.AppleRAID 4.0.6

  com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIBlockStorage 1.6.4

  com.apple.driver.Oxford_Semi 2.6.1

  com.apple.iokit.SCSITaskUserClient 2.6.8

  com.apple.BootCache 31.1

  com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib 1.0.0d1

  com.apple.driver.AppleFWOHCI 4.7.3

  com.apple.driver.Intel82574L 2.1.8b1

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBHub 4.2.4

  2.1.7 com.apple.driver.AppleAHCIPort

  com.apple.driver.AppleEFINVRAM 1.4.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBEHCI 4.2.4

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBUHCI 4.2.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleHPET 1.5

  com.apple.driver.AppleRTC 1.3.1

  com.apple.driver.AppleACPIButtons 1.3.6

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMBIOS 1.7

  com.apple.driver.AppleACPIEC 1.3.6

  com.apple.driver.AppleAPIC 1.4

  com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient 142.6.0

  com Apple.Security.sandbox 1

  com Apple.Security.Quarantine 0

  com 2.1.14 Apple.NKE.applicationfirewall

  com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement 142.6.0

  com Apple.nke.PPP 1.5

  com.apple.driver.AppleProfileReadCounterAction 17

  com.apple.driver.DspFuncLib 2.0.5f14

  com.apple.driver.AppleProfileTimestampAction 10

  com.apple.driver.AppleProfileThreadInfoAction 14

  com.apple.driver.AppleProfileRegisterStateAction 10

  com.apple.driver.AppleProfileKEventAction 10

  com.apple.driver.AppleProfileCallstackAction 20

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusController 1.0.10d0

  com Apple.NVIDIA.nv50hal 6.3.6

  6.3.6 com.apple.NVDAResman

  com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport 2.2.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireIP 2.0.3

  com.apple.iokit.IOSurface 74.2

  com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothSerialManager 2.4.5f3

  com.apple.iokit.IOSerialFamily 10.0.3

  com.apple.iokit.IOAudioFamily 1.8.3fc2

  com.apple.kext.OSvKernDSPLib 1.3

  com.apple.driver.AppleHDAController 2.0.5f14

  com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily 2.2.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOHDAFamily 2.0.5f14

  com.apple.iokit.AppleProfileFamily 41

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMC 3.1.0d5

  com.apple.driver.IOPlatformPluginFamily 4.7.0a1

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusPCI 1.0.10d0

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBHIDKeyboard 141,5

  com.apple.driver.AppleHIDKeyboard 141,5

  com.apple.iokit.IOUSBHIDDriver 4.2.0

  com.apple.driver.BroadcomUSBBluetoothHCIController 2.4.5f3

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBBluetoothHCIController 2.4.5f3

  com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothFamily 2.4.5f3

  com.apple.driver.XsanFilter 402.1

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBMergeNub 4.2.4

  com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIBlockCommandsDevice 2.6.8

  com.apple.iokit.IOUSBMassStorageClass 2.6.7

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBComposite 3.9.0

  com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireSerialBusProtocolTransport 2.1.0

  com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireSBP2 4.0.6

  com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIMultimediaCommandsDevice 2.6.8

  com.apple.iokit.IOBDStorageFamily 1.6

  com.apple.iokit.IODVDStorageFamily 1.6

  com.apple.iokit.IOCDStorageFamily 1.6.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireFamily 4.2.6

  com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIParallelFamily 2.1.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOAHCISerialATAPI 1.2.6

  com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIArchitectureModelFamily 2.6.8

  com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily 1.10

  com.apple.iokit.IOUSBUserClient 4.2.4

  com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily 2.0.6

  com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily 4.2.4

  com.apple.driver.AppleEFIRuntime 1.4.0

  com.apple.iokit.IOHIDFamily 1.6.6

  com.apple.iokit.IOSMBusFamily 1.1

  com.apple.kext.AppleMatch 1.0.0d1

  com.apple.security.TMSafetyNet 6

  com.apple.driver.DiskImages 289.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOStorageFamily 1.6.3

  com.apple.driver.AppleACPIPlatform 1.3.6

  com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily 2.6.5

  com.apple.iokit.IOACPIFamily 1.3.0

  Model: MacPro4, 1, MP41.0081.B07 of BootROM, 8-Quad - Core Intel Xeon processor, 2.26 GHz, 6 GB, MSC 1.39f5

  Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120, GeForce GT 120, PCIe, 512 MB NVIDIA

  Memory module: global_name

  Bluetooth: Version 2.4.5f3, 2 service, 12 aircraft, 1 incoming serial ports

  Service network: Ethernet 1, Ethernet, en0

  Service network: Ethernet, Ethernet, 2 in 1

  PCI card: scsi, sppci_scsi_bus, slot-3

  PCI card: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120, sppci_displaycontroller, Slot-1

  Serial ATA Device: HL-DT-ST DVD - RW GH41N

  Serial ATA Device: Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB, GB 232,89 SSD

  Serial ATA Device: WDC 1.82 TB, WD2002FAEX-007BA0

  Serial ATA Device: ST31000528AS, GB 931,51

  Serial ATA Device: ST31000528AS, GB 931,51

  SCSI device: Equipment of SCSI target @ 0

  SCSI device: Equipment of SCSI target @ 16

  USB device: Keyboard Hub, 0x05ac (Apple Inc.), 0 x 1006, 0xfd300000 / 3

  USB device: Apple USB Optical Mouse, 0x05ac (Apple Inc.), 0 x 0307, 0xfd310000 / 5

  USB device: Apple keyboard, 0x05ac (Apple Inc.), 0x024f, 0xfd320000 / 4

  USB device: USB-SATA Bridge, 0x067b (Prolific Technology, Inc.), 0 x 2773, 0xfd100000 / 2

  USB device: CRCA102 * AF1, 0 x 0764 (Cyber Power Systems, Inc.), 0 x 0501, 0x1a200000 / 2

  USB Device: Hub BRCM2046, 0x0a5c (Broadcom Corp.), 0 x 4500, 0x5a100000 / 2

  USB device: Bluetooth USB Host Controller, 0x05ac (Apple Inc.), 0 x 8215, 0x5a110000 / 3

  FireWire devices: built-in_hub, up to 800 Mb/s

  FireWire device: G-DRIVE, HGST, up to 800 Mb/s

  The panic occurred because the queue of the AHCI is truncated. Thus all things SATA are immediately suspect.

  These extensions on the "scene of the crime" are used ordinary ACHI drivers for SATA drive.

  In your added kernel extensions, you have an additional driver for RocketRAID. If possible, you should remove only while debugging this problem. It was not explicitly on the "crime scene", but it may have made changes that caused the instability.

  In addition, readers could be involved in this problem, as a failed drive can spray data in the wrong section of memory, rewrite of things.

• T450S w/SSD 1 TB Samsung 850 series Pro

  Hi all

  I'm currently busy to assemble the SSD on my T450S without success.

  Series Pro 1 TB Samsung 850 model MZ - 7KE1T0 Model Code: MZ-7KE1T0BW

  When I start the deployment of a new image of OS Windows the SSD it seems not to be recognized.

  I'm under JBET49WW (1.14) version of UEFI BIOS of 2015-05-21

  Y at - it a tip how to get this resolved?

  Kind regards

  J

  Believe it or not... After trying to install another SSD a TB Samsung 840 Pro 1 series which has been recognized! the 850 was welll and I could get a deployment entirely OS such as required. I'll look further and update what is the current version of the laptop BIOS and Firmware of the SSD.

• Samsung 850 EVO and TRIM?

  Dear friends,

  Yesterday, I installed a brand new SAMSUNG 850 EVO SSD (120 GB) on my MacBook Pro (mid-2012) and I want to know now I should activate TRIM and is it safe under the OS X EL CAPITAN!

  Once again his SAMSUNG 850 EVO (120 gb, basic version non pro), MacBook Pro (mid-2012) and OS X EL CAPITAN!

  Thanks for the reply.

  Hi, you can activate the trim after you have backed up your important things. I enabled it and don't have any problem and better see the SSD performance, but some of my friends in the face of a gray screen at startup upward.

  Also, I can say that you will not have problem as long as Apple allow you to do something on your Mac