Benefits of rooting

Similar Questions

• Replace control & Simulation default control plots (Locus of Bode/Step/Root) with the controls of the money

  I just installed the evaluation version of LabVIEW and LabVIEW Control Design and Simulation Module 2013. Normally, for the design of command I only use Matlab/Simulink but LabVIEW has some advantages and I want to enjoy these benefits. The problem, I think it's boring, it's that I can't use the money controls to change the default control style classis - like bode gain and track of lotus of margin or root below phase

  

  Hi muahang,

  Why not? What is the problem here?

  These plots are like XY graphics standards (maybe with graphs from bottom fantasy for the locus of the root)...

• ROOTED droid!

  It seems that the Droid has taken root, which means how did founf give the owner (we are not rent the thing you know) administrative rights on the operating system.

  So I think that piracy of the malicious intentions and should be a crime, happens to me also to think that someone is selling a device and then imposing restrictions on what they do with it, it is no less. We paid for the phone, we confess. I understand completely if the manufacturer and carrier want to void the warranty and also refuse to provide technical support, but other that that, we leave them alone. If we want to take the risk of bricking the phone, our risk.

  No one could be for an automaker does not let you put on different tires, change the audio system or to change or modify many operational aspects of the right car? There is a little difference of rights of directors from decompiling or rewriting parts of the OS and it benefits then.

  I look forward, at some point when companies realize that we are the owners of the phone, not tenants and it is not a privilege to buy the phone, they should be allowed to sell it for us.

  > Then I think that piracy of malicious intent is and should be a crime, happens to me also to think that someone is selling a device and then placing restrictions on what they do with it, it is no less. We paid for the phone, we own it.

  You're right about the phone - but it has nothing to do with the software, we license for use with the phone and are legally bound by the terms of this license.

  I LOVE that the phone has taken root and what it means for third party applications (can you say "bluetooth-full capacity" and "multipoint in all screens?) but let's call it what it is: piracy. And if it is in violation of the user's license, then owners must take responsibility for that--because the downside of rooting is malicious apps that will be able to do all sorts of vile and evil things to the BONE - and your data and personal information.

  On the one hand - the droid app world just got a big door wide open upwards - so user must now be much, much more cautious on the applications that they install.

  -michael

• Find root password

  Upgrade to Mac OS Sierra and all my accounts now have Standard permissions, i.e. without administrator permissions.

  How I either upgrade my administrator account or find the password for Root?

  There is no root password. This is a disabled account. For good reasons.

  You can enable the root account, but that increases your risk of being hacked much, because the root is a known account that has unlimited privileges. Enabling root makes your Mac a rich target environment.

  But if that's how you want to live your life, Google "enable OS X root" and you will find several approaches.

• User root cannot be turned on/off

  Hello, I am an inexperienced user of OS X, and I started looking on the privileges of the user for a while, just in case, for safety. And when I learned that all root user, I started tinkering on my MacBook, unusual activities as not to wake from sleep, sometimes running the fans at full speed at idle, useless speed even download when no activity going on in front of my computer, may be subject to a person who has had access to my mac back earlier that activated the user root and back to my mac remotely from the back then.
  So I tried to disable the root user, but I couldn't turn it off the screen or the directory utility with the command terminal dsenableroot - d. It just says: failed to disable the root user. `

  I need help on this problem. Thank you

  .. .but I couldn't turn it off the screen of the utility directory

  What were the exact steps that you did and what stopped you from neutralizing him?

  If you couldn't turn it off, because the menu item to disable showing 'enable', then the root user is not enabled.

• After you turn off the root of the directory utility user, I went back to the main screen and all other user accounts showed is no longer at the start, as they were before you enable the root user.  Help.  Please, I beg you.

  I have activated the user 'root '.  It was an attempt (for the sake of granddaughter age) to check its history since I am the administrator.  Realizing that this method was much more complicated than what I am capable of managing, I returned the utility program directory and disabled the user 'root '.  I thought that everything was ok, as I did not made anything while connected as user 'root '.  Instead, restart the computer, all users, including myself were no longer at the start.  The only point was a blank user name and password.  No picture.  No guest.  No user.  How to return those and I did something to cause this?

  Else you being logged in as root?

  Activation and deactivation, then root should not have caused that.

  Also, having allowed root is one of the ways you get a login screen showing only the name and the password.

  You should be able to type in your user name and password to connect.

  One time connected, check users & groups system prefs, Connection Options and make sure he's on the list of users. You will have to click on the padlock at the bottom to make changes.

• Glitch/Question of the root user

  All other encountered an error of password for the root user that uses a user admin instead account?

  Recently, I had to reinstall 10.11 on an iMac and went to create a startup disk. When I run sudo it asked for the root password (which is enabled) and kept saying "sorry, try again." I was sure I knew the password, but didn't so I reset the password of the root user. After the Reset Terminal still does not accept. I decided to user, my admin password and it worked.

  This is how it is supposed to behave or am I missing something? (Err is human but to REALLY screw up, run sudo)

  My Root user and the admin have the same password.

• How to install certificates root DOD under linux?

  I need to access this site: https://www.netfocus.netc.navy.mil/nrotc/candidate_app/Login.aspx to apply for the NROTC scholarship. I had been able to access this site last year, however, I've updated firefox and all I get is a "Secure connection failed" error now. Well, when I try to install the AC on this site DOD root certificates: http://dodpki.c3pki.chamb.disa.mil/rootca.html , I get an alert without end that say "this certificate cannot be verified and is not imported. What should I do to install this? I really need access the first site.

  The site seems to use TLS 1.0
  It works if I add the domain to the whitelist.

  The site may attempt to return to a lower version of TLS in a way that is no longer allowed in current versions or maybe use a deprecated suite of encryption.

  You can open the topic: config page through the address bar and use the search bar to locate this pref:

  • Security.TLS.insecure_fallback_hosts

  You can double-click the line to edit the prefs and add the FQDN (www.netfocus.netc.navy.mil) to the value of this preference.
  If there are already websites (domains) in this list, then add a comma and the new domain (without space).
  There should be only areas separated by a comma in the column value (example.com,www.example.com).

  If this help you can contact this Web site and ask them to look into this and update their security.

• Security problem? Getting root is ridiculously easy.

  Well, then I noticed the other day that an app (can't remember which) that usually of guests for my password to get root privileges didn't do - it just keeps going do need privileges for.

  I remembered that shortly before, I used sudo in iTerm to run a command with root privileges, and I know that OS X is not asking your password the first time you run sudo unless a certain number of minutes has elapsed. I had assumed that this behavior would be local to the thread which you initially provided the password, what would have been the zsh session in iTerm. However, it seemed that he was local, at the session of zsh, zsh, or the iTerm. A completely different application had apparently grafted on my sudo 'session' and acquired the rights root without my permission.

  I tested this by issuing a sudo command in zsh in iTerm, and then, after giving my password, I opened Terminal with bash and issued a command sudo there. No guest password, root privileges instant.

  On this basis, it is clear that any application that is running as a user who can run sudo to obtain root privileges (which is any normal OS X user) can wait for the user to run sudo and immediately obtain root access on the system. Know when the current user runs sudo is easy, such an event is written to the syslog.

  Proof of concept. Quick-n-dirty. Save as a script and run in a terminal window. Then run sudo in another Terminal window. The script will intercept the sudo event and write the empty file "kilroy was here", as root: wheel, at the root of the drive.

  #! / bin/bash

  tail-f n 0 /var/log/system.log | grep m 1 EI ' sudo\ [[0-9] +------]: \s+'$USER

  echo «go play with root privs...» »

  sudo touch/kilroy-was-here

  This seems... Bad... Thoughts?

  Daniel

  Can you show a gain (Standard) of the 'Normal' user root after the administrator has used sudo?

• Give root certificates and the 'green list' which sites they are allowed to check?

  More a feature than anything request: I think it would be a good idea to have a whitelist optional for which sites a certificate root is allowed to check. A common situation would be a company cert root - if the browser can be configured to doesn't have to be a CA for the sites within this company users (employees in this case) could be sure that the company was not spying on their browsing to other sites, while allowing them to create and revoke certificates for their own at will. (But I remember at least a story recently where that would have allowed the general public when a CA started allowing the fake sites.)

  Back to Firefox developers and requests can be made here:
  https://input.Mozilla.org/en-us/feedback

• How can I get authorization for the Droid in the car at the root

  Tonight, I'm well been trying for three weeks to get rid of the intruders

  Sorry it's not related to Mozilla Firefox. We are not able to help rooting your phone.

• Just after to see if Eric Root was of Rochester, MN, and PV KS. How can I get rich email list?

  Just after to see if Eric Root was of Rochester, MN, and PV KS. How can I get rich email list?

  This who exactly are you referring to when you say, "How can I get off the copious list email? There is no list email however there are discussions on these forums, you can follow. To unfollow one, simply click a track at the top of the page.

• Entrust G2 root is not in the list of Mozilla's CA certificates

  We noticed that Entrust G2 root certificates only are not in the list of Mozilla's CA certificates. We contacted Entrust and they confirmed that the certificates were sent to Google, Microsoft and Mozilla, and there was nothing they could do to solve the problem.

  Are there plans to update the list with new root SHA2 certificates? We are having problems with false positives vulnerability and problems due to not having Mozilla do not these certificates in the trust store.

  https://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/about/governance/policies/security-group/certs/included/

  Hello, the root certification authority should work with mozilla to get these certificates in the store of the browser trusts. This question seems to be tracked in bug # 849950.

• ZTE C open does not have access to the root after race unlock tool

  I ordered an open C of ZTE on Ebay from the United Kingdom, and I wanted to unlock the bootloader.
  I followed the instructions from here (http://en.comebuy.com/developer-firefox-os-open-c.html), installed the version of the EU (I ordered the phone from the Hungary), but if I boot into recovery mode, I see that the recovery version is 0B 04, but it must be B 0, 06, and the phone is not rooted because of this (adb shell getprop ro.secure) command (it says 0 and as far I know this means that it is not rooted).
  I want to use android on the device, but now I can't even install the kitkat or the rom of firefox (it says error verifivation) could you help me how to install Kitkat on device with gapps?

  Hi Lukibeni,

  I understand that you tried to update your open C of ZTE eBay using the image on the page Comebuy, but that the update seems to have been unsuccessful.

  I suggest you try to redownload your image and go through the update process once more.

  If the problem persists, you will need to contact ZTE for extra support. ZTE is the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) who created the device-specific construction and update tools.

  Please let us know if the update process works the second time around.

  Thank you

  -Ralph

• Building Firefox MSI with certificate authorities roots parameters ntlm and Add-ons disabled

  I have to build a Firefox MSI with CA root installed automatically, some NTLM configured parameters, and modules disabled by default with users unable to make it back on.

  I know that Add-ons can be disabled with Firefox running in safe mode.  I know how to add the Root CAs and I believe I can change the NTLM settings while monitoring with EMCO (an MSI builder) without issue.  Otherwise I know that I can create a config file for the NTLM settings.
  

  However, I am very confused with how I should configure the certification authority root to be a trusted root automatically. I will try to follow up while I add these settings, but I fear that the package that I build is not complete.

  I'm completely stumped on how to disable the modules. If it's a subject: config parameter, is possible to lock on: config?

  Thank you very much for the help guys, I am always impressed at the level of intelligence in the Mozilla forums.

  you might have to look http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1435000/programmatically-install-certificate-into-mozilla