Best practices for Exchange 2003 with VMWare ESXi 3.5 and iSCSI SAN

Similar Questions

• I would like to know the "best practices" for unplugging my computer permanently to the internet and other updates.

  Thank you for taking the time to read this. I would like to know the "best practices" for unplugging my computer permanently to the internet and other updates. I thought I would do a clean install of Windows XP, install my Microsoft Works again and nothing else. I would like to effectively transforming my computer into a word processor. He continues more and more slow. I get blue screen errors, once again. I received excellent Microsoft Support when it happened before, but since my computer is around 13 years, I think it is not worth the headache to try to remedy. I ran the Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor, and my computer would not be able to upgrade. Please, can someone tell me how to make it only a word processor without updates or internet connection? (I already have a new computer with Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium, it's the computer that I use. The old computer is just sitting there and once a week or so I updates.) I appreciate your time, thank you!

  original title: old computer unstable

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-XP/help/Setup/install-Windows-XP

  http://www.WindowsXPHome.WindowsReinstall.com/sp2installxpcdoldhdd/indexfullpage.htm

  http://aumha.NET/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=44636

  Clean install XP sites
  You can choose which site to reinstall XP.

  Once it is installed, then you do not have to connect what anyone, however, some updates may be required to perform the work, test this by installing work and see if you get an error msg. Except that you should be fine.

• What is the best practice for a 'regular' Server VMware and VDI environment?

  What is the best practice for a "regular" VMware Server and VDI environment?   A single environment (ESXi and SAN) can accommodate two if it is a whole new configuration?  Or even better to keep separate?

  Enjoying inputs.

  Quick and dirty answer is that "it depends."

  serioulsy, it depends really two things budget and IO.  If you had the money for two without then buy two and don't have to host your server environment and the other for VDI desktop, their IO profiles are completely different.

  If this is not the case, try to keep each type of use for their own dedicated LUN.

• Best practices for using MSE8350 with VCS Expressway

  Thanks for the tips and suggestions!

  Given that VCS highway is the only entry point from the rest of the world into our network of videoconference, what is the best way to deploy and use an IP MSE8350 GW?

  Organizations put it outside their firewall next to a fast track to allow of the older endpoints direct dial in the menu of the GW IP system? We have one that does nothing and I'm trying to figure out what to do with it. (bought before that I'm here).

  Thank you!

  It always depends on what the needs are. It can be deployed inside, outside, both in combination with the

  VCS or even autonomous.

  I have often seen it deployed inside, so she can speak the TMS to receive directories.

  This deployment also gives you the ability to reach endpoints on the IP addresses of the internal network.

  The VCS-E (and (C) have an option for a back fall alias, you can simply set the address of the

  IPGW. In this scenario, a call to the ip address of the vcs-e will hit the ipgw inside.

  This limits also all external ip for VCS-E (s) connectivity.

  For me its sad to see that the IPGW is end of life, I think it would be perfect as an IVR system

  and could be combined with for example the conductor.

  If you still can't find a way to use it, feel free to donate to me ;-)

• Best practices for vSphere 5 Networking

  Hi all

  Given the following environment:

  (1) 4 physical servers, each server has 16 (Gigabit) network interface cards will install vSphere 5 std.

  (2) 2 switches with SAN storage battery function

  (3) 2 Equallogic PS4000 SAN (two controllers)

  (4) 2 switches for the traffic of the virtual machine

  As for networking, I intend create some vSwitches on each physical server as follows

  1 vSwitch0 - used for iSCSI storage

  6 network adapters are associated with IP-hash, multitracks with iSCSI Storage consolidation policy. and storage load balancing is round Rodin (vmware)

  (vmware suggests to use 2 cards for 1 traget of IP storage, I'm not sure)

  2 vSwitch1 - used for the virtual machine

  6 Teamed network adapters for the traffic of the virtual machine, with the hash intellectual property policy

  3 vSwitch2 - management

  2 network cards are associated

  4 vSwitch3 - vMotion

  2 network cards are associated

  You would like to give me some suggestions?

  Alex, the standard set by the storage and VMware is used by dell for their servers and tested sound on their equipment and the publication of the document, it is recommended...

  This sound is the best practice for dell server with this model mentioned in the document to use.

  Hope that clarifies...

• Best practices for the compression of the image in dps

  Hello! I read up on best practices for the compression of the image in dps and I read the asset from the source of panoramas, sequences of images, Pan and zoom images and audio skins is resampled not downloading. You will need to resize them and compress them before deleting the in your article, because the dps do not do it for you. Hey can do!

  So Im also read as he active source of slideshows, scrolling images, and buttons ARE resampled as PNG images. Does this mean that DPS will compress for you when you build the article? Does this say I shouldn't worth going bother to resize these images at all? I can just pop in 300 DPI files 15 MB used in the print magazine and dps will compress their construction article - and this will have no effect on the size of the file?

  And this is also the case with static background images?

  
  

  Thanks for your help!

  All images are automatically resampled to based on the size of the folio you do. You can put in any image resolution you want, it's not serious.

  Neil

• Best practices of a partition of HDD on Windowes Server2008 and Windowes 2012

  What is the best practice for partition of HDD on Windowes Server 2008 and 2012 Windowes

  Could be interesting to ask more http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winservergen/threads that you can get more answers.

  That said I would say that very much depends on what you intend to do with the server, and of course how much space you have available.

  For a general server I would probably go with two volumes, the C:\ drive for the file system and a second volume for your data, for example E:\. I recommend at LEAST 30 GB for the C:\, 40-50 GB preference, since updates, patches, etc will burn way over time and it's much easier to start big than to try to develop later.

  If you are running the Terminal Services, then you will probably need a larger C:\ amount as a large part of the user profile data is stored there in order to run lack of space fairly easily.

  As I said, it depends on what you do, how much space and disks you have available etc, it isn't really a one-size-fits-all answers.

• Best practices for network configuration of vSphere with two subnets?

  Well, then I'll set up 3 ESXi hosts connected to storage shared with two different subnets. I configured the iSCSI initiator and the iSCSI with his own default gateway - 192.168.1.1 - targets through a Cisco router and did the same with the hosts configured with its own default gateway - 192.168.2.2. I don't know if I should have a router in the middle to route traffic between two subnets since I use iSCSI ports linking and grouping of NETWORK cards. If I shouldn't use a physical router, how do I route the traffic between different subnets and use iSCSI ports binding at the same time. What are the best practices for the implementation of a network with two subnets vSphere (ESX host network: iSCSI network)? Thank you in advance.

  Install the most common iSCSI would be traffic between hosts and

  the storage is not being routed, because a router it could reduce performance.

  If you have VLAN 10(192.168.1.0/24) iSCSI, VLAN 20 (192.168.2.0/24) ESX

  MGMT and VLAN 30 (192.168.3.0/24) comments VMs and VLAN 40 (192.168.4.0/24)

  vMotion a deployment scenario might be something like:

  NIC1 - vSwitch 0 - active VMK (192.168.1.10) MGMT, vMotion VMK (192.168.4.10)

  standby

  NIC2 - vSwitch 1 - current (VLAN30) guest virtual machine port group

  NIC3 - vSwitch 2 - active VMK1 (192.168.1.10) iSCSI

  NIC4 - vSwitch 2 - active VMK2 (192.168.1.11) iSCSI

  NIC5 - vSwitch 1 - current (VLAN30) guest virtual machine port group

  NIC6 - vSwitch 0 - MGMT VMK (192.168.2.10) standby, vMotion

  VMK (192.168.4.10) active

  You would place you on VLAN 10 storage with an IP address of something like target

  192.168.1.8 and iSCSI traffic would remain on this VLAN. The default value

  gateway configured in ESXi would be the router the VLAN 20 with an ip address of

  something like 192.168.2.1. I hope that scenario help set some options.

  Tuesday, June 24, 2014 19:16, vctl [email protected]>

• Best practices for storing the Logs of the system for all newly improved ESXi hosts?

  Hi people,

  What are the options and best practices for the Logs of the system for all newly improved 5.1u1 ESXi hosts?

  Do I need to have the Syslog server or it can be safely ignored?

  Thank you

  Evening,

  Syslog is preferred, but VMware has provided a collector of syslog on the vcenter installation disc can be installed on any windows host or your vcenter. I can't count the number of times where I had guests CMTF or newspapers lost... Fortunately for the syslog which collects up to the accident.  It is not necessary, but it's really a good idea without any real cost since you can use your vcenter host.

  Here is an article on how to install it:

  Set up Syslog ESXi collector | VMware vSphere Blog - VMware Blogs

  Thank you

• Best practices for Smartview when upgrading from Excel 2003 to Excel 2007?

  Anyone know the best practice for Smartview during the upgrade from Excel 2003 to Excel 2007?
  
  
  Current users have Microsoft Excel 2003 with Smartview 9.3.1.2.1.003.
  
  Computers are upgraded to Microsoft Excel 2007.
  
  
  What is the best practice for Smartview in this situation?
  
  1. do nothing with Smartview and just install Excel 2007.
  
  2. install Excel 2007 and then uninstall and reinstall Smartview
  
  3 uninstall Smartview, Excel 2007 installation and then install Smartview
  
  4 something else?
  
  
  Thank you!

  We went with option 1 and it worked very well. Be aware that OAS Treaty substantially slower in Excel 2007 to 2003. Many users have been/is unhappy about the switch. We have not tested SV v11 yet, so I don't know if it has improved performance with Excel 2007 or not (hopefully it does).

• Best practices for dealing with Exceptions on members of storage

  We recently encountered a problem where one of our DistributedCaches was closing himself and restart due to a RuntimeException is thrown from our code (see below). As usual, it's our own code and we have updated to not throw a RuntimeException in all circumstances.
  
  I would like to know if there are some best practices for Exception handling, other than catching Exceptions and their record. We should always catch the Exceptions and ensure that they do not spread back to code that is running from the pot of consistency? Is it possible to configure consistency so that our DistributedCaches are not completed even when filters custom and other throw RuntimeExceptions?
  
  
  Thank you, Aidan
  
  
  Exception below:
  
  2010-02-09 12:40:39.222/88477.977 Oracle coherence GE < error > 3.4.2/411 (thread = DistributedCache:StyleCache, Member = 48): a (java.lang.RuntimeException) exception occurred reading Message AggregateFilterRequest Type = 31 for Service = DistributedCache {Name = StyleCache, State = (SERVICE_STARTED), LocalStorage = active, PartitionCount = 1021, BackupCount = 1, AssignedPartitions = 201, 204 = BackupPartitions}
  2010-02-09 12:40:39.222/88477.977 Oracle coherence GE < error > 3.4.2/411 (thread = DistributedCache:StyleCache, Member = 48): DistributedCache ending because of an exception not handled: java.lang.RuntimeException

  We have reproduced you problem in the House and it looks like a global filtering does not
  the correct thing (i.e. having caught a processed) when moving from a runtime exception.
  In general runtime exceptions should simply be exploited and returned to the application
  without compromising the cache server, so we will be solving it.

• Best practices for vsphere 5.1

  where can I find the doc more up-to-date about berries EQL configuration / best practices with vmware vsphere 5.1

  Hello

  Here is a link to a PDF file that covers best practices for ESXi and EQL.

  Best EqualLogic practices ESX

  en.Community.Dell.com/.../20434601.aspx

  This doc mentions specifically that the storage Heartbeat VMKernel port is no longer necessary with ESXi v5.1.  VMware has corrected the problem that made it necessary.

  If you add it to a 5.1 system it will not hurt.  It will take an IP address for each node.

  If you upgrade 5.0 to 5.1, you can delete it later.

  Here is a link to VMware which addresses this issue and has links to other Dell documents which confirm also that it is fixed in 5.1.

  KB.VMware.com/.../Search.do

  Kind regards

• Best practices for .vmx

  We are moving a few guests of NetApp storage to a new VNX.  NetApp best practices (when we started with them) was to separate hard drives containing BONES and data from the virtual machine configuration file, newspapers, clings. newspapers, etc.  VMWare recommends the. VMDK for vm and OS configuration files be on the same data store.  From a point of view of the administration, it would be easier to follow the recommendation of VMware, but it would not conflict with features such as compression and dedup VNX storage?  Exchange files for example would not be entirely deduped.

  I'm probably a more conservative person and use thick provisioning, unless I am forced to do otherwise. If time permits I even create virtual disks "Eager to zero thick" which concentrates hard at the time of creation, rather than files in production. It is also the recommended method to prepare the virtual disks for data bases for example.

  I'm not saying a provisioning is not useful, but it really depends on the environment and the ability to quickly add additional storage if necessary.

  André

• Best practices for managing strategies of path

  Hello

  I get conflicting advice on best practices for managed paths.

  We are on version 4.0 of ESXi connection to a HP EVA8000. Best practices guide HP recommends setting the strategy of railways handle on Round Robin.

  This seems to give two active paths to the optimized controller. See: http://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA1-2185ENW.pdf

  We used certain consultants and they say that the best practices of Vmware for this solution is to use the MRU policy which translates a single path to the optimized controller.

  So, any idea what good practice is best practice? Does make a difference?

  TIA

  Rob.

  Always go with the recommendation of the storage provider.  VMware recommendation is based on the characteristics of the generic array (controller, capable ALUA failover methods, etc.).  The storage provider's recommendation is based on their performance and compatibility testing.  You may want to review their recommendations carefully, however, to ensure that each point is what you want.

  With the 8000, I ran with Round-Robin.  This is the option of creating more robust paths available to you from a failover and performance point of view and can provide performance more even through the ports on the storage controller.

  While I did of the specific tests/validation, the last time that I looked at the docs, the configuration of HP recommends that you configure each IO to the ports in the switch configuration.  This adds the charge to the ESX host, the switch to other ports, but HP claims that their tests showed that it is the optimal configuration.  It was the only parameter I wondered in their recommendation.

  If you haven't done so already, be sure to download the HP doc on configuring ESX and EVA bays.  There are several parameters that you must configure the policy path, as well as a few scripts to help make the changes.

  Virtualization of happy!

  JP

  Please consider awarding points to useful or appropriate responses.

• Anyone run a Terminal servers virtual with VMware ESXi 3.5 If Yes please share your experiences?

  Hello guys,.

  We are runnig Terminal Server with Windows Server 2003 Ent in a cluster environment (TS 7), we plan to go with VMware ESXi 3.5 to virtualize the TS. Does anyone have any kind of experiences that can help make a decision?

  Thank you.

  Keep an eye on the side esxtop ESX and see your % RDY meters in this output.  Don't forget, as underlined chamon, with high vSMP values do not match always the best performance.  Typical scenarios citrix/ts use 1-2 vCPU for more effective results.  If you bump up to a larger number of users, you also want to watch the overcommitt on your processors and vCPUs in the box.  Many users a lot of switching and use heavy context on the processors for the management of the OS and the user.  1-2 vCPU seems to be the sweet spot.  What kind of applications are underway within the environment?

  -KjB

  VMware vExpert