Broker acceso y wan lan al mismo

Similar Questions

• Automatic switch between (WAN/LAN-WIFI)

  Hello

  Does anyone who knows how can I set up an auto switch between LAN and WIFI? My concern is to automate switching between the two when I plug the ethernet cable or unplug it. For some laptop models, we can set an option in the bios that are "Lan/Wan switching" but I can't find it on Lenovo X 1 model.

  Thanks for your time

  Pat

  Access connection does what it takes, as shown

  

  

• How to use [evdo] Dial up and WAN (LAN) at the same time?

  I have an EVDO USB Modem that connects as a dial-up connection,

  also have a connection(LAN/WAN) always on broadband.

  Whenever I connect my EVDO USB Modem (dial-up)

  LAN goes dead until the break of the dial.

  I want to use both at the same time, how can I use the modem for some applications specific torrent client, download accelerator or any other application without disconnecting from the local network?

  I want my LAN always on where I can use my dial up as additional connection for some applications. Give me a tweak or tool for this.

  Please help me it is very important to me...

  and I had read a previous post but it not me helped

  My win xp sp3 operating system

  Hey Er. Rohanmangal,

  It is not possible to have two fittings together. You can use a connection at a time.

• RV320 WAN & LAN limitations

  Hello

  I would get a few useful claryfication, (new to this dev).

  1 WAN interface: supported ports UNTAG mode only, but happening tags from/to other devices, intermediary?

  2 port LAN: is there a way to configure LAG or just clean up STP redundancy on two LAN ports that are connected to two separate Cisco switches (themselves configuration with an OFFSET?)  The same subnet or VLAN on both ports of eth rv320?

  I'm trying to get a redundancy/failover LAN ports wil b/c router can be used with redundant switches.

  Andrew

  Hello

  1 WAN interface supports UNTAG mode only. This means that packets from LAN to WAN will be natted as not tagged. Packets arriving on the WAN port should not be tagged, or get

  2. LAN ports - not LAG and STP support

  Kind regards

  Bismuth

• WAN/Lan data converters

  I need to convert an x 21 delivered a paper of lan rj45 data circuit. Y at - it such a converter, and if so what's the reliability?

  You can use a router to do this. A 2500 2600 or even would work very well.

  I hope this helps.

  Steve

• X 200 wireless WAN & Lan

  Hello

  I just got my new X 200 last Friday I'm absolutely in love with so far. I just stumbled upon a problem with my installed WWAN card. I can't make it work.

  Just material won't if initialize, which is when I go to 'ThinVantage Mobile Broadband Connect', it shows me the error message «no wide devices found wireless broadband» If I open "Fn + F5", I see the WWAN card, but I can not power. I went so far to reinstall the driver and even crack open the unit to see if she was physically present. I am aware to a sim card for the WWAN card work. I even put in a 2nd sim card of my German provider. ThinkVantage GPS shows me the error «Failed to initialize port GPS COM.»  (309).

  So what do this? Phone support told me that I need to have a map of acctivated AT & T. This will not be an option but as I do not have a SSN. Besides, I'm sure I read somewhere that at least the GPS should work with any SIM card, right?

  Second of all, when I cracked open my device, I noticed that the Intel WiFi Link 5300 card was just to connect to 2 antennas. A little, I bought this card to have faster speeds and perhaps have better reception because of the multiple antennas against the 5100. Now, I'm afraid that I won't be able to use benefits due to the antenna of 3rd missing?

  Thank you!

  P.s.: The card WWAN an EricssonF3507g.

  
  

• Issues dhcp/wan WRT320N

  It's my first router linksys I thought that linksys/cisco is the best on the market, but I only have problems with the unit

  Maybe it's a stupid configuration item that I did not, maybe it's something else. Discover

  Thus begins the story: I own a modem, D-link 320 T who connect to the internet. Behind this modem is a router, since last week a linksys WRT320N brilliant.

  And here begins the problem...

  When I enable dhcp on the modem, linksys receives a modem rental contract. But the linksys makes a mistake, the analysis of these data or something. Instead of putting its lan ip address - something lke 192.168.1.x (what gives my modem DHCP), it takes my ip wan to my ISP (83.101.x.x). This configuration does not give me the internet, and it won't let me connect to my modem on the local network.

  When I configure this setting myself manually on 192.168.1.x, the connection between the router in the modem is correct, I have internet & I am able to connect to my modem. So, it's very well :-)

  But don't know the real problem, after a day, it 'to forget' this setting or something and I can not connect to the internet or a modem. The linksys is always configured as manually ip address 192.168.1.x, but it just cannot connect to modem more...

  So, it's pretty lame...

  A trick to solve it is to re - activate the dhcp on my modem, leaving the linksys get a lease, the deactivation of this rental agreement and all manually reset the 192.168.1.x, and then I have my precious internet once again...

  But this isn't how I want... I don't want to reset the settings on my linksys daily...

  So the question is: why the linksys stops responding on the wan port? And perhaps more important, when you use dhcp, therefore the ip wan lan - IP?

  THX in advance :-)

  So, I found a solution... Not great, but it works...

  I discovered that the dlink modem is a modem half bridge when you use to connect to the internet (no idea what that means)...

  So I decided to make my modem a full bridge...

  There is an option in the settings...

  The modem through a transfer of full-bridge the management of the Internet from the modem to the router...

  This makes the modem, a translator, translate adsl in ethernet-signals signals. And thereafter the router control internet...

  And now the router receives the ip address (which is the wan IP, which always even when the modem handles internet...).

  But now the modem is stripped out of his duties...

  But I have internet! To make it work again!

  I still think it's weird the router and the modem (in the basic settings, control the internet) talks like 30 hours... And then suddenly stops "talk" to each other...

  Oh whatever

  It works

• DMZ FOR LAN

  IF I HAVE APPLAIANCE ON DMZ LETS SAY OF E-MAIL SECURITY... DO I NEED TO ACL OR NAT BETWEEN THE DMZ TO LAN POLICY?

  OR SIMPLY POLITICAL NAT AND ACLS OF THE WAN TO DMZ... AND DMZ TO LAN WILL SPEAK WITHOUT INTERRUPTION

  You don't need a policy of NAT, DMZ - LAN, only ACLs, which will allow traffic from the local network to your device in the DMZ.

  You must configure the NAT policy and an ACL while providing access outside your network form. That is to say, WAN - LAN or WAN - DMZ.

• Router business small RV082 - Wake on lan (Internet)

  Hi all, I saw old discussions about WOL and RV082/RV042.

  As blocks to route broadcast from internet to lan packets, operate, the WOL I should change the table of ARP on the router using telnet, this action was probably, with the versions V1 and V2 possible, but challenging telnet connection (http://<> Address > / sysinfo123.htm IP?) ConsoleSimulation = 1 with RV082 V3 nothing is displayed and the telnet connection on fails (23) standard port.

  Does anyone know how to get the magic packet WOL through a V3 RV082 on internet to the LAN?

  Using simply do not port forwarding, router throw broadcast packets from the internet.

  Hi Loris, you're wrong, if the computer was turned off completely, you will never be able to reactivate it. Even if a router does not throw a broadcast packet, the firewall will be. What you need to do is to tell the router to wait for the type of service and just allow it.

  Render a service to the customer, usually port 9... then do 2 access rules.

  First access rule is WAN LAN refuse all services of refuse any source and any destination

  Second rule is to WAN to LAN with permit personal service from any source to any destination

  For good measure, you can try to do a port forwarding, but give access to try first rule. I assure you of the network card or the BIOS of the computer is in sleep. The MAC address is what is important that's why I don't feel of port forwarding is necessary.

  This will allow this package through the router. When you connect to the network of the internet, the computer you are using has no notion of what computer on the local network it is trying to access (unless you specify the correct fields in the WOL GUI). He uses the IP and the subnet of the external router. So as long as the computer on the local network has the listening port that corresponds to the WOL GUI so it should work.

  You can test this also

  http://www.depicus.com/wake-on-LAN/woli.aspx

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Access to the WAN1 and WAN2 router LAN

  Hello

  I use a RV042 to save my LTE (6840 Fritzboc) router with a DSL (Fritzbox 7390) router. Now to configure the router and access the router for my VOIP phone line I need access to WAN1 and WAN2 WAN1 WAN2 and from the local network. The structure looks like this:

  LTE DSL (public IP)

  |                  |

  FB6840 FB7390 (192.168.178.202)

  |                 |

  WAN1 WAN2 (192.168.178.102)

  |__________|

  |

  RV042 (192.168.178.254)

  |

  LAN

  |

  PC (192.168.178.100)

  Are all in the same subnet (192.168.178) and the firewall access rule to access the WAN and LAN and vice versa is configured.

  Problem one)

  If I now try to ping 192.168.178.202 (FB7390) from the PC (192.168.178.100) it does not find a road to the FB7390. That's why I can not administer the FB7390 (as a solution, I use a WiFi dirct to box)

  Problem b)

  I have an unlimited plan with the LTE supplier for mobile phone calls and I would like to use from the DSL box. This is why I need a connection between the two boxes. But even when not possible to ping from FB6840 to FB7390, or vice versa.

  Any ideas how to get this working?

  Thanks in advance

  Klaus

  Hi Klaus,

  If I understand your idea, in an instant, you want a package to come to the port of WAN1 and be routed to WAN2 port, incoming whitout RV042 LAN. This is not supported by the router. It can route traffic between ports WAN, it can only from WAN, LAN and vice versa.

  Kind regards

  Bismuth

• RV180W of WLAN traffic is not routed to WAN

  My WIFI traffic is not routed to WAN.

  I can access LAN and plug to NIR all on the local network. But internet access is not possible. WAN LAN access is allowed.

  I have reset the RV180w to factory settings and also reflashed the firmware to make sure.

  To configure a static route to wlan to wan?

  The routing of the generated RV180 table

  Destination	Entry door	Genmask	Metric	REF	Use	Interface	Type	Flags
  127.0.0.1	127.0.0.1	255.255.255.255	1	0	0	Lo	Static	Upward, gateway, host
  172.16.0.0	0.0.0.0	255.255.254.0	0	0	0	BDG1	Dynamics	UPWARD
  85.0.84.0	0.0.0.0	255.255.252.0	0	0	0	eth1	Dynamics	UPWARD
  127.0.0.0	0.0.0.0	255.0.0.0	0	0	0	Lo	Dynamics	UPWARD
  0.0.0.0	85.0.84.1	0.0.0.0	0	0	0	eth1	Dynamics	Upward, gateway

  Hi Pete,.

  I read your case, it seems that the problem is not related. What I am referring is an external AP connected to the RV180W when the wireless is enabled on the RV180W. Devices that connect to the AP will not be able to access the internet. If the radio on the RV180W is turned off, the devices that connect to the AP can connect to internet.

  -Marty

• ASA L2L IP WAN au Public

  Hi all

  I have an obligation to set up a private network virtual of our network for a developer with the following basic topology:

  Our private subnet - ASA (WAN IP) - VPN - end developer audience - protected Developer Public IPs point

  If the developer has a bunch of public IPs protected behind a single endpoint, so that we can have access, we have our external IP to establish a VPN to this endpoint.

  I understand that we will not use NAT as internal IP addresses will be PAT behind the external IP - traffic to the IPs developer audience then will bring up the VPN tunnel and everything works as expected (I think?)

  Here is the config to base on the top of my head, is - this correct or I get very confused?

  network of the DEVELOP1 object
  host 2.2.2.2
  object OUR - WAN network
  host 1.1.1.1
  the object of OUR LAN network
  192.168.10.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
  !
  NAT (vlan10, outside) after the automatic termination of dynamic source OUR - OUR - WAN LAN
  !
  outside_cryptomap extended access list allow OUR WAN ip object DEVELOP1
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ikev1 SHA-ESP-3DES esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
  !
  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_cryptomap
  card crypto outside_map 1 set counterpart 5.5.5.5
  card crypto outside_map 1 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA ikev1
  !
  outside_map interface card crypto outside
  !
  IKEv1 crypto policy 10
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  !
  internal GroupPolicy_5.5.5.5 group strategy
  attributes of Group Policy GroupPolicy_5.5.5.5
  Ikev1 VPN-tunnel-Protocol
  tunnel-group 5.5.5.5 type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group 5.5.5.5 General attributes
  Group - default policy - GroupPolicy_5.5.5.5
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 5.5.5.5
  IKEv1 pre-shared-key thepassword

  Hello

  You can have communication with the public IP to L2L tunnel stack... What you need is NAT/PAT at both ends and your statement of cryptomap should be with your NAT or PAT... instead of... private LAN address by looking at your config, it seems to be okay... I also hope that your LAN users only launch the right of movement?

  Because to get out, you can have a generic Pat... but when the other end accepts traffic be tone should have a dedicated static NAT or direct public IP of the servers to an end... or at least King of thing port forwarding, they should have done on their end... If both ends have a generic pat then it won't work.

  Concerning

  Knockaert

• OptiPlex 7010 don't Wake on Lan

  I have an OptiPlex 7010 that wol set in the bios, enabled in Intel nic properties for a magic packet, and it will not wake on Lan.

  I upgraded the Bios of the A12 to A13 because it shows he had some changes WOL, but that did not help either.

  I never went to this post but then A13 was the most recent bios and it did not work but A15 came out after it and it worked for Wake on Wan/Lan.

• Speed upload a third download speed?

  Pay for 100 Mbit/s Up and Down. Download speed is close to that, but the download speed is less than 30% of that. Get the same results without worrying if I am connected via Wi - Fi (AirPort Extreme ac Tower) or Mac mini (end 2012) is directly connected via an Ethernet cable. Same results on Mac, iPhone and iPad, too.

  Here is some of the best. When a friend connected PC via Ethernet Dell midrange, he got 95 Mbps the two top and bottom. Same connection, even cable.

  Is there something on the hardware Apple or Apple by default network settings, which would explain this? Everything that can be done?

  

  Puzzled indeed! Not sure, at this point, why the PC is the only device not affected.

  I suggest that we start with the performance of your local network and then to go to the WAN - LAN interface with your AirPort base station.

  I use WiFiPerf from the App Store. There are versions for OS X and iOS. It's a little expensive, but there should be alternatives based on iPerf. It works on a client/server relationship and did a great job to measure flow rates of data on wireless networks.

  As an alternative, I would also suggest TamoSoft flow Test. It will test the wired and wireless connections. It's free, but they do not have a version of iOS, so you'll need another Mac or PC to make it work properly.

  No matter what you use, you will want to run the client on your Mac mini and supported the server on another device. Then create measures of your current network. For example, if your mini is connected to the base station via Ethernet and other Mac, also connected by Ethernet, you should see close reading of 1 Gbps for TCP with little or no errors. Similarly, you must take measures for Wi - Fi. You shouldn't get something close to that.

  If both measures are closer to what you want with your network, we know is not your local network, that is the question and we would move to the router-modem interface.

• Connection of Internet Time Capsule airport

  Before buying, I asked the store if this would replace my sky router, they said yes. However, all connections are WAN/LAN, and there is no reference to a direct connection to my BT socket (via a broadband filter). Should I still my Sky router).

  Unfortunately, the store bad informed you. The Apple base station, including your new Time Capsule do NOT have a built-in modem. You will still need a modem to access the Internet with it... then Yes, you can be forced to keep your sky existing for this hub or get a dedicated modem (no router).