bulk collect line IDs

Similar Questions

• Bulk collect treats all lines not containing the LIMIT clause.

  Hi all
  
  I was referring the Oracle Site for COLLECTION in BULK.
  
  http://www.Oracle.com/technology/oramag/Oracle/08-Mar/o28plsql.html
  
  In the following code, I found and I ran the same.
  
  I just want to know why motor Pl - SQL is not processing or recital 27 last lines when I use % NOTFOUND cursot attribute.
  
  
  

  PROCEDURE process_all_rows_foi_test (p_limit PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT 100)
  IS
     CURSOR c1
     IS
        SELECT *
          FROM all_objects
         WHERE ROWNUM <= 227;
  
     TYPE foi_rec IS TABLE OF c1%ROWTYPE
        INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
  
     v_foi_rec   foi_rec;
     v_number    NUMBER  := 1;
  BEGIN
     OPEN c1;
  
     LOOP
        FETCH c1
        BULK COLLECT INTO v_foi_rec LIMIT p_limit;
  
        EXIT WHEN v_foi_rec.COUNT = 0;--------EXIT WHEN c1%NOTFOUND;--->Here is the issue
        DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (v_number);
        v_number := v_number + 1;
     END LOOP;
  
     CLOSE c1;
  END;

  Please guide me on this.
  
  Thank you
  Arun

  % NOTFOUND will have the value TRUE when it gets below the limit

  (it is documented)

  But your workaround works fine

  SQL> declare
    2     CURSOR c1
    3     IS
    4        SELECT *
    5          FROM all_objects
    6         WHERE ROWNUM <= 227;
    7
    8     TYPE foi_rec IS TABLE OF c1%ROWTYPE
    9        INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
   10
   11     v_foi_rec   foi_rec;
   12     v_number    NUMBER  := 1;
   13  BEGIN
   14     OPEN c1;
   15
   16     LOOP
   17        FETCH c1
   18        BULK COLLECT INTO v_foi_rec LIMIT 100; --p_limit;
   19
   20        EXIT WHEN v_foi_rec.COUNT = 0;--------EXIT WHEN c1%NOTFOUND;--->Here is the issue
   21        DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (v_foi_rec.count);
   22        v_number := v_number + 1;
   23     END LOOP;
   24
   25     CLOSE c1;
   26  END;
   27  /
  100
  100
  27
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> 
  

  Another option would be to place the EXIT right before your END LOOP;

• Subsequentes IN BULK COLLECT in the collection truncates existing lines?

  T_tab_prds TYPE IS the % TYPE my_cursor TABLE;
  
  v_tab_prds t_tab_prds;
  
  OPEN my_cursor;
  Fetch the my_cursor COLLECT in BULK IN v_tab_prds;
  NARROW My_cursor
  
  another session can change/remove lines
  
  OPEN my_cursor;
  Fetch the my_cursor COLLECT in BULK IN v_tab_prds; -V_tab_prds VA be zapped before second READING or lines will be mixed? I have to
  -manually remove lines of v_tab_prds before the second EXTRACTION?
  NARROW My_cursor

  I answered Yes initially "later in BULK collect into collection truncate existing lines. Then I noticed "another session can change or remove rows" in your message. The collection is in the object memory with PL/SQL unit scope, it is stated in which is obviously not covered by sessions. So even if the collection belongs to the same unit of PL/SQL (package, SP, etc.) in different sessions, it's a different chunk of memory. So the final answer is:

  Later in BULK COLLECT in the collection to the breast within the same instance of PL/SQL unit truncates existing lines. But obviously subsequent TO BULK COLLECT into the collection in another session won't affect collection in the first session.

  SY.

  Published by: Solomon Yakobson, October 13, 2009 14:20

• Using bulk collect into with assistance from the limit to avoid the TEMP tablespace error run out?

  Hi all

  I want to know if using bulk collect into limit will help to avoid the TEMP tablespace error run out.

  We use Oracle 11 g R1.

  I am assigned to a task of creating journal facilitated for all tables in a query of the APEX.

  I create procedures to execute some sql statements to create a DEC (Create table select), and then fires on these tables.

  We have about three tables with more than 26 million records.

  It seems very well running until we reached a table with more than 15 million record, we got an error says that Miss tablespace TEMP.

  I googled on this topic and retrieve the tips:

  Use NO LOG

  Parallel use

  BULK COLLECT INTO limited

  However, the questions for those above usually short-term memory rather than running out of TEMPORARY tablespace.

  I'm just a junior developer and does not have dealed with table more than 10 million documents at a time like this before.

  The database support is outsourced. If we try to keep it as minimal contact with the DBA as possible. My Manager asked me to find a solution without asking the administrator to extend the TEMP tablespace.

  I wrote a few BULK COLLECT INTO to insert about 300,000 like once on the development environment. It seems.

  But the code works only against a 000 4000 table of records. I am trying to add more data into the Test table, but yet again, we lack the tablespace on DEV (this time, it's a step a TEMP data)

  I'll give it a go against the table of 26 million records on the Production of this weekend. I just want to know if it is worth trying.

  Thanks for reading this.

  Ann

  I really need check that you did not have the sizes of huge line (like several K by rank), they are not too bad at all, which is good!

  A good rule of thumb to maximize the amount of limit clause, is to see how much memory you can afford to consume in the PGA (to avoid the number of calls to the extraction and forall section and therefore the context switches) and adjust the limit to be as close to that amount as possible.

  Use the routines below to check at what threshold value would be better suited for your system because it depends on your memory allocation and CPU consumption.  Flexibility, based on your limits of PGA, as lines of length vary, but this method will get a good order of magnitude.

  CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE show_pga_memory (context_in IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL)

  IS

  l_memory NUMBER;

  BEGIN

  SELECT st. VALUE

  IN l_memory

  SYS.v_$ session se, SYS.v_$ sesstat st, SYS.v_$ statname nm

  WHERE se.audsid = USERENV ('SESSIONID')

  AND st.statistic # nm.statistic = #.

  AND themselves. SID = st. SID

  AND nm.NAME = 'pga session in memory. "

  Dbms_output.put_line (CASE

  WHEN context_in IS NULL

  THEN NULL

  ELSE context_in | ' - '

  END

  || 'Used in the session PGA memory ='

  || To_char (l_memory)

  );

  END show_pga_memory;

  DECLARE

  PROCEDURE fetch_all_rows (limit_in IN PLS_INTEGER)

  IS

  CURSOR source_cur

  IS

  SELECT *.

  FROM YOUR_TABLE;

  TYPE source_aat IS TABLE OF source_cur % ROWTYPE

  INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;

  l_source source_aat;

  l_start PLS_INTEGER;

  l_end PLS_INTEGER;

  BEGIN

  DBMS_SESSION.free_unused_user_memory;

  show_pga_memory (limit_in |) "- BEFORE"); "."

  l_start: = DBMS_UTILITY.get_cpu_time;

  OPEN source_cur.

  LOOP

  EXTRACTION source_cur

  LOOSE COLLECTION l_source LIMITED limit_in;

  WHEN l_source EXIT. COUNT = 0;

  END LOOP;

  CLOSE Source_cur;

  l_end: = DBMS_UTILITY.get_cpu_time;

  Dbms_output.put_line (' elapsed time CPU for limit of ')

  || limit_in

  || ' = '

  || To_char (l_end - l_start)

  );

  show_pga_memory (limit_in |) "- AFTER");

  END fetch_all_rows;

  BEGIN

  fetch_all_rows (20000);

  fetch_all_rows (40000);

  fetch_all_rows (60000);

  fetch_all_rows (80000);

  fetch_all_rows (100000);

  fetch_all_rows (150000);

  fetch_all_rows (250000);

  -etc.

  END;

• Bulk collect using some different column insert a table

  Hi all

  I gave an example of emp table in my original 100 million table record are I need to change group (IE deptno) 10 to 20 copy the same records

  about these codes, I get exception

  ORA-06550: line 11, column 53:

  PLS-00386: concordance that is 'EMP_TAB' between FETCH cursor and IN variables of type

  can help me please for these

  declare

  type row_tab is table emp % rowtype

  INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;

  emp_tab row_tab;

  cursor cur_emp is select ENAME, 20 DEPTNO, HIREDATE, emp COMM EMPNO;

  Start

  Open cur_emp;

  loop

  Cur_emp fetch bulk collect in the limit emp_tab 2000;

  ForAll i in 1.emp_tab. COUNTY

  Insert / * + APPEND * / into emp (EMPNO, ENAME, DEPTNO, HIREDATE, COMM)

  values (emp_tab (i). EMPNO, emp_tab (i). Ename, emp_tab (i). DEPTNO, emp_tab (i). HIREDATE, emp_tab (i). COMM.) ;

  When the output cur_emp % notfound;

  END LOOP;

  close cur_emp;

  end;

  /

  Thank you

  VSM

  I use the user define the type of record to over come error

  declare

  type emp_rt is record (empno, ename emp.ename%type,deptno NUMBER (2) emp.empno%type, hiredate emp.hiredate%type,comm emp.comm%type);

  TYPE row_type IS the emp_rt INDEX TABLE OF pls_integer;

  emp_tab row_type;

  cursor cur_emp is select empno, ename, 20 deptno, hiredate, comm from emp where deptno = 10;

  Start

  Open cur_emp;

  loop

  Cur_emp fetch bulk collect in the emp_tab limit 2;

  ForAll i in 1.emp_tab. COUNTY

  Insert / * + APPEND * / into EMP (EMPNO, ENAME, DEPTNO, HIREDATE, COMM)

  values (emp_tab (i). EMPNO, emp_tab (i). ENAME, emp_tab (i). DEPTNO, emp_tab (i). HIREDATE, emp_tab (i). COMM.)

  ;

  When the output cur_emp % notfound;

  END LOOP;

  close cur_emp;

  end;

  /

  records are successful inserted, I do not know is not the right approach for 100 million documents?

  Thank you

  VM

• Get 'not enough values error' in bulk collect

  I want to insert all the rows in the employees table in the tmp table which has the structure.

  Purpose: Try just feature fired block to create a return to the top of a table.

  Problem: My code is to not "enough of values" error please report if mistaken.

  structure of the employees table:

  SQL > desc employee;

  Name                                      Null?    Type

  ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------

  EMPLOYEE_ID NOT NULL NUMBER (6)

  FIRST NAME VARCHAR2 (20)

  LAST_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (25)

  EMAIL NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (25)

  PHONE_NUMBER VARCHAR2 (20)

  HIRE_DATE NOT NULL DATE

  JOB_ID NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (10)

  SALARY NUMBER (8.2)

  COMMISSION_PCT NUMBER (2.2)

  MANAGER_ID NUMBER (6)

  DEPARTMENT_ID NUMBER 4

  tmp table structure:

  SQL > tmp desc;

  Name                                      Null?    Type

  ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------

  EMPLOYE_ID NUMBER (6)

  FIRST NAME VARCHAR2 (20)

  LAST_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (25)

  EMAIL NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (25)

  PHONE_NUMBER VARCHAR2 (20)

  HIRE_DATE NOT NULL DATE

  JOB_ID NOT NULL VARCHAR2 (10)

  SALARY NUMBER (8.2)

  COMMISSION_PCT NUMBER (2.2)

  MANAGER_ID NUMBER (6)

  DEPARTMENT_ID NUMBER 4

  SQL > select * from tmp;

  no selected line

  Code:

  declare

  type rec is the employee table % rowtype

  index by pls_integer;

  a rec;

  Start

  Select * bulk collect in a

  employees;

  ForAll i in a.first... a.Last

  Insert into tmp values (a (i));

  end;

  /

  Result:

  SQL > declare

  2

  3 type rec is the employee table % rowtype

  4 index of pls_integer;

  5 a rec;

  6

  7. start

  8 remove tmp;

  9 select * bulk collect in a

  10 employees;

  11 ForAll i in a.first... a.Last

  12 insert into tmp values (a (i));

  13 end;

  14.

  Insert into tmp values (a (i));

  *

  ERROR on line 12:

  ORA-06550: line 12, column 13:

  PL/SQL: ORA-00947: not enough values

  ORA-06550: line 12, column 1:

  PL/SQL: SQL statement ignored

  Remove parentheses

  insert into tmp values a(i);
  

  or call the individual columns

  insert into tmp( employee_id, first_name, ... )
   values( a(i).employee_id, a(i).first_name, ... );
  

  Justin

• PLS-00201: identifier 'i' must be declared when using BULK COLLECT with FORALL to insert data in 2 tables?

  iHi.

  Declare
     cursor c_1
     is
      select col1,col2,col3,col4
      from table1
  
  
     type t_type is table of c_1%rowtype index by binary_integer;
     v_data t_type;
  BEGIN
     OPEN c_1;
     LOOP
        FETCH c_1 BULK COLLECT INTO v_data LIMIT 200;
        EXIT WHEN v_data.COUNT = 0;
        FORALL i IN v_data.FIRST .. v_data.LAST
           INSERT INTO xxc_table
             (col1,
              col3,
              col4
             )
              SELECT v_data (i).col1,
                     v_data (i).col3,
                     v_data (i).col4
                FROM DUAL
               WHERE NOT EXISTS
                            (SELECT 1
                               FROM xxc_table a
                              WHERE col1=col1
                                    .....
                            );
                       --commit;
           INSERT INTO xxc_table1
             (col1,
             col2,
            col3,
            col4
             )
              SELECT v_data (i).col1,
                     v_data (i).col2,
                     v_data (i).col3,
                     'Y'
                FROM DUAL
               WHERE NOT EXISTS
                            (SELECT 1
                               FROM xxc_table1 a
                              WHERE col1=col1
        .....
       );
  
  
         --exit when c_1%notfound;
     END LOOP;
     CLOSE c_1;
     commit;
  END;
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  I get 40/28-PLS-00201: identifier 'I' must be declared what the problem in the above code please help me and I have lakhs of data

  Thank you

  Post edited by: Rajesh123 I changed IDX

  Post edited by: Rajesh123 changed t_type c_1 in Fetch

  But by using a SET of INSERT to insert into two tables at once in the same query would do the job without any collection of bulk of PL and avoid to query two times too.

  for example, as a single INSERT...

  SQL > create table table1 as
  2. Select 1 as col1, col2 of 1, 1 as col3, 1 as col4 Union double all the
  3 select 2,2,2,2 of all the double union
  4 Select 3,3,3,3 Union double all the
  5 Select 4,4,4,4 of all the double union
  6 select 5,5,5,5 of all the double union
  7 select 6,6,6,6 of all the double union
  8 select 7,7,7,7 of all the double union
  9 select 8,8,8,8 of all the double union
  10. Select 9,9,9,9 to the Union double all the
  11. Select double 10,10,10,10
  12.

  Table created.

  SQL > create table xxc_table like
  2. Select 1 as col1, col3 2, 3 as col4 Union double all the
  3. Select the 3, 4, 5 Union double all the
  4. Select the 5, 6, 7 double
  5.

  Table created.

  SQL > create table xxc_table1 like
  2. Select 3 as col1, col2, col3, 5 4 "n" as col4 Union double all the
  3. Select the 6, 7, 8, double "n"
  4.

  Table created.

  SQL > insert all
  2 when the xt_insert is null then
  3 in xxc_table (col1, col3, col4)
  4 values (col1, col3, col4)
  5 when the xt1_insert is null then
  6 in xxc_table1 (col1, col2, col3, col4)
  7 values (col1, col2, col3, 'Y')
  8. Select t1.col1 t1.col2, t1.col3, t1.col4
  9, xt.col1 as xt_insert
  10, xt1.col1 as xt1_insert
  11 from table1 t1
  12 left join external xxc_table xt (t1.col1 = xt.col1)
  13 left xt1 xxc_table1 outer join (t1.col1 = xt1.col1)
  14.

  15 rows created.

  SQL > select * from xxc_table by 1.
  COL1 COL3 COL4
  ---------- ---------- ----------
  1          2          3
  2          2          2
  3          4          5
  4          4          4
  5          6          7
  6          6          6
  7          7          7
  8          8          8
  9          9          9
  10-10-10

  10 selected lines.

  SQL > select * from xxc_table1 by 1.

  COL1 COL2 COL3 C
  ---------- ---------- ---------- -
  1          1          1 Y
  2          2          2 Y
  3          4          5 N
  4          4          4 Y
  5          5          5 Y
  6          7          8 N
  7          7          7 Y
  8          8          8 Y
  9          9          9 Y
  10-10-10

  10 selected lines.

  SQL >

• Bulk Collect and Millions of records.

  Hey guys,.

  I did experiences autour with big collect in GR 11, 2...

  I have millioms of files with very large tables.

  In fact, my question is this. How do you use bulk collect when you have millions of records?

  Everytime I try to use it for bulk collect into, I have run out of memory.

  So should I stick with the SQL engine when it comes to manipulate millions

  folders? Is maninly bulk collect for insert, updates to use for applications?

  Summer banging my head for awhile with it. Can a Pl/SQL pro if you please

  Give me some advice on this?

  In most cases SQL insert/update engine will end up more quickly then PL/SQL select + Insert/Update. Normally, you would use PL/SQL, if there is a complex logic that is based on calculations of several rows that can be easily made in SQL. If you must use BULK COLLECT many or / and wide lines, you can divide it into segments using LIMIT.

  SY.

• On bulk collect forall vs fusion simple statement

  I understand that a single DML statement is better that use bulk collect to have all the intermediary undertakes. My only concern is that if I load a large amount of data as a record 100 million records in a 800 million table with foreign keys and indexes and the session is killed, the cancellation may take some time which is not acceptable. Using bulk collect forall with interval of validations is slower than a declaration unique fusion straight, but in the case of dead session, the restore time will be not too bad and a reload of the not yet committed data will be not as bad. For the design of a load of recoverable data which may not be affected as badly, is in bulk collect + for all the right approach?

  So if I chunk it upward in 50 lines, the child table must be loaded to its matching when records the parent table loaded and validate them.

  ... and then create a procedure that takes care of the parent AND child data at the same time.

  SQL for DBMS_PARALLEL_EXECUTE would be:

  "start load_parent_and_child (: start_id,: end_id); end; »

  PS - you don't want to run ECD and DML PARALLEL at the same time...

  MK

• Bulk collect using Order by

  Greeetings,

  Version:-8i

  {code}

  Select * bulk collect into collection_test where d_id = 4 order by e_id;

  {code}

  Can the above code collect data in the order defined by our query? or he will seek lines in an order any.

  Thanks in advance...

  Yes, he'll get it sorted. For more information, see this link http://www.oracle-developer.net/display.php?id=428

• Bulk collect with sequence Nextval

  Hello
  
  
  Oracle Database 10 g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64 bit
  
  
  Had a doubt about the collection in bulk with nextval sequence. You need to update a table with a sequence of Nextval.
  
  where should I place select below in the proc is this before or after the loop
  
  
  < font color = "red" > SELECT prop_id_s.nextval INTO v_prop_id FROM dual; < / make >
  

  CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE  (state IN varchar2)
  AS
     
     CURSOR get_all
     IS
        SELECT                              /*+ parallel (A, 8) */
              A .ROWID
              from Loads A WHERE A.Prop_id IS NULL;
  
     TYPE b_ROWID
     IS
        TABLE OF ROWID
           INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
  
     
     lns_rowid          b_ROWID;
  BEGIN
  
  
     OPEN Get_all;
  
     LOOP
        FETCH get_all BULK COLLECT INTO   lns_rowid LIMIT 10000;
  
        FORALL I IN 1 .. lns_rowid.COUNT
           UPDATE   loads a
              SET   a.prop_id= v_prop_id (I)
            WHERE   A.ROWID = lns_rowid (I) AND a.prop_id IS NULL;
  
        
        COMMIT;
        EXIT WHEN get_all%NOTFOUND;
     END LOOP;
  
     
  
     CLOSE Get_all;
  END;
  /

  Published by: 960736 on January 23, 2013 12:51

  Hello

  It depends on what results you want. All updated rows would take the same value, or should all get unique values?

  Whatever it is, you don't need the sliders and loop. Just a simple UPDATE statement.

  If each line requires a unique value of the sequence, then

  UPDATE  loads
  SET     prop_id     = prod_id_s.NEXTVAL
  WHERE     prop_id     IS NULL
  ;
  

  If all the lines that have a need to the same value null, then:

  SELECT     prod_id_s.nextval
  INTO     v_prop_id
  FROM     dual;
  
  UPDATE  loads
  SET     prop_id     = v_prop_id
  WHERE     prop_id     IS NULL
  ;
  

  Don't forget to declare v_prop_id as a NUMBER.

  I hope that answers your question.
  If not, post a small example of data (instructions CREATE and INSERT, only relevant columns) for all the tables and the involved sequences and also publish outcomes from these data.
  If you ask on a DML statement, such as UPDATE, the sample data will be the content of the or the tables before the DML, and the results will be the State of the or the tables changed when it's all over.
  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
  Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).
  See the FAQ forum {message identifier: = 9360002}

• bulk collect into with limit

  Hi all
  I was reading [http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:5918938803188] of Tom Kyte site on bulk collect within limits. The code uses the % notfound cursor to exit the recovery loop. What I do in this situation is using exists, method of table rather than cursor attribute.

  create or replace procedure p1 is
  type num_list_type is table of number index by pls_integer;
  num_list num_list_type;
  
  cursor c1 is select temp from test;
  
  begin
  open c1;
  loop
    fetch c1 bulk collect into num_list limit 2;
    if num_list.exists(1)=false then
      exit;
    end if;
    for i in num_list.first..num_list.last 
    loop
      dbms_output.put_line(num_list(i));
    END LOOP;
  end loop;
  
  end;

  Since when I do this:

  exit wen c1%notfound  

  It will close when the cursor retrieves only less than the limit, leaving a few rows. If the code works properly.
  Question:
  1. is the Exit statement properly, is there another way (I'm a little skeptical because I'm not using the cursor)?
  2 How to decide on the size limit based on what we have in the hardware settings and oracle? All of the guidelines?
  3 - is the best practice when it comes with the cursor and several lines that still use bulk collect into?
  
  Best regards
  Val

  Valerie Debonair wrote:
  Hi all
  I was reading [http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:5918938803188] of Tom Kyte site on bulk collect within limits. The code uses the % notfound cursor to exit the recovery loop. What I do in this situation is using exists, method of table rather than cursor attribute.

  create or replace procedure p1 is
  type num_list_type is table of number index by pls_integer;
  num_list num_list_type;
  
  cursor c1 is select temp from test;
  
  begin
  open c1;
  loop
  fetch c1 bulk collect into num_list limit 2;
  if num_list.exists(1)=false then
  exit;
  end if;
  for i in num_list.first..num_list.last
  loop
  dbms_output.put_line(num_list(i));
  END LOOP;
  end loop;
  
  end;
  

  Since when I do this:

  exit wen c1%notfound  
  

  It will close when the cursor retrieves only less than the limit, leaving a few rows. If the code works properly.
  Question:
  1. is the Exit statement properly, is there another way (I'm a little skeptical because I'm not using the cursor)?
  2 How to decide on the size limit based on what we have in the hardware settings and oracle? All of the guidelines?
  3 - is the best practice when it comes with the cursor and several lines that still use bulk collect into?

  Best regards
  Val

  Hello

  1. Yes, in above code statement EXIT will work correctly. The other way is % NOTFOUND CURSOR attribute usage.
  2. There is no precise way to decide the size limit.
  3 depends on number of records. If you have a lot of records always use LIMIT that improves performance.

  After reading the link that was posted by Blu, I am to edit this post.

  1. do not use CURSOR attribute when you use collections within a cursor. Use methods of collection such as COUNT or EXIST etc.

  @Blu,

  Thanks much for the link.

  Thank you
  Suri

  Published by: Suri on January 26, 2012 20:38

• Bulk collect and inserts

  Hello, I'm quite new to PLSQL and need some advice...
  
  I have several procedures that work well and do what I want to do.
  
  My question is, am I'm going in the right direction or would you all another way? If there were millions of records that would be the fastest way?
  
  All comments/comments would be greatly appreciated.
  
  Procedure 1:
  
  declare
  
  type membera is the table of the gym_members_payment_details.member_id%type;
  payment type is the gym_members_payment_details.payment_plan%type table;
  type date_payment_recieved is table of the gym_members_payment_details.date_payment_recieved%type;
  
  v_member membera;
  v_payment payment;
  v_date_payment_recieved date_payment_recieved;
  date of v_date_due;
  
  cursor c1 is select member_id, payment_plan, gym_members_payment_details date_payment_recieved;
  
  Start
  
  Open c1;
  
  collect the fetch c1 into bulk in v_member, v_payment, v_date_payment_recieved;
  
  Close c1;
  
  I'm in v_member.first... v_member. Last
  
  loop
  
  
  
  If v_payment (i) = "daily" then update gym_members_payment_details set date_payment_due = v_date_payment_recieved (i) where member_id = v_member (i);
  elsif v_payment (i) is "weekly" then update gym_members_payment_details set date_payment_due = v_date_payment_recieved (i) + 7 where member_id = v_member (i);.
  elsif v_payment (i) is "monthly" then update gym_members_payment_details set date_payment_due = v_date_payment_recieved (i) + 30 where member_id = v_member (i);.
  end if;
  
  
  end loop;
  
  end;
  
  Procedure 2
  
  declare
  
  Bench type is the gym_members_lifts.bench_kg%type table;
  squat type is the gym_members_lifts.squat_kg%type table;
  type of death is the gym_members_lifts.deadlift_kg%type table;
  type membera is the table of the gym_members_lifts.member_id%type;
  type bodyw is table of the gym_members_lifts.body_weight_kg%type;
  
  V_bench bench;
  v_squat squat;
  v_dead dead;
  v_body bodyw;
  number of v_total;
  number of v_ratio;
  v_member membera;
  
  cursor c1 is select bench_kg, squat_kg, deadlift_kg, member_id, gym_members_lifts body_weight_kg;
  
  
  Start
  
  / * bulk collect * /.
  
  Open c1;
  collect the fetch c1 into loose in v_bench, v_squat, v_dead, v_member, v_body;
  
  Close c1;
  
  / * Update gym_members elevators table with combined lifts and body weight to lift rates rounded to 2 places * /.
  
  I'm in v_member.first... v_member. Last
  loop
  
  
  v_total: = v_bench (i) + v_squat (i) + v_dead (i);
  Update gym_members_lifts set total_lift_kg = v_total where v_member (i) = member_id;
  v_ratio: = round ((v_bench (i) + v_squat (i) + v_dead (i)) / v_body (i), 2);
  Update gym_members_lifts set bodyweight_strength_ratio = v_ratio where v_member (i) = member_id;
  
  
  end loop;
  
  end;
  
  Published by: 882839 on November 29, 2011 14:25

  882839 wrote:

  My question is, am I'm heading in the right direction

  It depends on the type of film you make. Your direction may work for a movie comedy or a disaster, perhaps.

  or you would do any differently?

  Completely different.

  If there were millions of records that would be the fastest way?

  The fastest way is to do the absolute minimum of work to achieve the desired results.

  You do not have to shake the SQL data in a detour by the PL/SQL engine. Bulk processing is slow.

  While processing bulk is faster than 'normal' treatment - but for one reason only. Reduction in switching between SQL and PL/SQL engines.

  The cost of treatment in bulk increases PGA - using more private process memory (the most expensive type of memory of the server). More extraction in bulk, the PGA TOUR more is consumed. Very large bed can crash the Oracle db server to the risk of exhausting all the free server memory and give rise to serious swap space trashing.

  And that's all. Treatment in bulk does not run the SQL cursor all faster. Treatment in bulk does not reduce the IO very expensive and slow. There is no that activate more lines have to be extracted from the SQL cursor by context switch and thus reduce the change of context.

  In this regard, what is optimal? No change at all in context.

  How is this achieved? No treatment in bulk. It is obtained by eliminating the need to change entirely in context. This means no PL/SQL. This means that SQL.

  Optimize SQL. Minimize the PL/SQL.

  Do not use the PL/SQL engine to do the things that the SQL engine is perfectly capable of doing.

  Simplistic example in the sense of your first PL/SQL procedure:

  SQL> create table foo( id number, payment varchar2(1), due date );
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> insert into foo select level, 'D', null from dual connect by level <= 5;
  
  5 rows created.
  
  SQL> insert into foo select level+5, 'W', null from dual connect by level <= 5;
  
  5 rows created.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> update     foo
    2  set        due = (
    3                  case
    4                          when payment = 'D' then trunc(sysdate+1)  --// daily payment's due date calc
    5                          when payment = 'W' then trunc(sysdate+7) --// weekly payment's due date calc
    6                  end
    7          );
  
  10 rows updated.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> select * from foo;
  
          ID P DUE
  ---------- - -------------------
           1 D 2011/12/01 00:00:00
           2 D 2011/12/01 00:00:00
           3 D 2011/12/01 00:00:00
           4 D 2011/12/01 00:00:00
           5 D 2011/12/01 00:00:00
           6 W 2011/12/07 00:00:00
           7 W 2011/12/07 00:00:00
           8 W 2011/12/07 00:00:00
           9 W 2011/12/07 00:00:00
          10 W 2011/12/07 00:00:00
  
  10 rows selected.
  
  SQL>
  

• Using the slider for and BULK COLLECT INTO

  Hi all
  in this case we prefer to use the cursor AND the cursor with the LOOSE COLLECTION? The following contains two block this same query where used FOR the slider, the other is using COLLECT LOOSE. The task that is running better given in the existing? How do we measure performance between these two?
  
  I use the example of HR schema:

  declare
  l_start number;
  BEGIN
  l_start:= DBMS_UTILITY.get_time;
  dbms_lock.sleep(1);
  FOR employee IN (SELECT e.last_name, j.job_title FROM employees e,jobs j 
  where e.job_id=j.job_id and  e.job_id LIKE '%CLERK%' AND e.manager_id > 120 ORDER BY e.last_name)
  LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ('Name = ' || employee.last_name || ', Job = ' || employee.job_title);
  END LOOP;
  DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('total time: ' || to_char(DBMS_UTILITY.get_time - l_start) || ' hsecs');
  END;
  /
   
  declare
  l_start number;
  type rec_type is table of varchar2(20);
  name_rec rec_type;
  job_rec rec_type;
  begin
  l_start:= DBMS_UTILITY.get_time;
  dbms_lock.sleep(1);
  SELECT e.last_name, j.job_title bulk collect into name_rec,job_rec FROM employees e,jobs j 
  where e.job_id=j.job_id and  e.job_id LIKE '%CLERK%' AND e.manager_id > 120 ORDER BY e.last_name;
  for j in name_rec.first..name_rec.last loop
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ('Name = ' || name_rec(j) || ', Job = ' || job_rec(j));
  END LOOP;
  DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('total time: ' || to_char(DBMS_UTILITY.get_time - l_start) || ' hsecs');
  end;
  /

  In this code, I put a timestamp in each block, but they are useless, since they both launched virtually instantaneous...
  
  Best regards
  Val

  (1) bulk fired fresh primary use is to reduce the change of context between sql and pl sql engine.
  (2), you should always use LIMIT when it comes with bulk collect, this does not increase the load on the PGA.
  (3) and the ideal number of BOUNDARY lines is 100.

  Also if you really want to compare performance improvements between the two different approaches to sql pl try to use the package of runstats tom Kyte

  http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/Apex/asktom.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

• make exception when using BUlk collect

  Hi all
  
  version of DB 10 g
  
  I've written a procedure as below
  

  create or replace procedure test_proc2 is
  
  type v_emp_rec is record 
  (empno number,
  ename varchar2 (200));
  
  type v_emp_tab is table of v_emp_rec index by binary_integer;
  
  v_tab v_emp_tab;
  
  begin
  
  select empno,ename
  into v_tab(0)
  from emp
  where empno = 7369;
  
  dbms_output.put_line (v_tab(0).ename);
  
  exception 
  when no_data_found then
  dbms_output.put_line ('I am in no data found exception');
  end;

  now, I tried to perform the procedure below
  

  begin
  test_proc2;
  end;

  the foregoing is works well, but I want to use the functionality of collection in bulk so I use as below
  

  create or replace procedure test_proc2 is
  
  type v_emp_rec is record 
  (empno number,
  ename varchar2 (200));
  
  type v_emp_tab is table of v_emp_rec index by binary_integer;
  
  v_tab v_emp_tab;
  
  begin
  
  select empno,ename bulk collect
  into v_tab
  from emp
  where empno = 7369;
  
  dbms_output.put_line (v_tab(0).ename);
  
  exception 
  when no_data_found then
  dbms_output.put_line ('I am in no data found exception');
  end;

  the foregoing gives me exception, please someone can explain why it is not in the exception block.
  
  Thanks in advance.

  The obvious answer is because an exception no_data_found is raised.
  The question is there.

  It's either select it because there is no data where empno = 7369.

  Or is the .ename of v_tab (0), because there is no element 0. Automatic collection of indexing starts at 1.

  for example

  SQL>  declare
    2    type t1 is table of pls_integer index by pls_integer;
    3    v1 t1;
    4   begin
    5    v1(1) := 1;
    6    dbms_output.put_line(v1(0));
    7   end;
    8  /
   declare
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-01403: no data found
  ORA-06512: at line 6
  
  SQL> 
  

  If you catch the exceptions and do not spread them properly, then hide you all information kind of useful as a line number, etc..