Calculation, including the facts of two dimension

Hello

I would like to perform calculations on facts of two different sections.
Example: I have a (fresh) made with a single dimension (time). There are two records in the fact table, the costs for the 'now' and costs for "then":

How can I calculate, for example, the difference in costs between "now" and "then"?

Thanks for your help!

Concerning
Matthias

Do you know if I can hide the lines of items not calculated in the diagram somehow?

Yes. It is also possible. For this you need to hide the lines of items not calculated from your PivotTable itself so that the chart does not display it.

I don't have obiee with me right now. Click on the properties of this line (in the same place where you created your calculated item), there will be a skin called option or hidden or something like that. Click on it. the uncalculated wil be lost.

close the message if we respond.

Tags: Business Intelligence

Similar Questions

  • Calculation of the sum between two dates

    Hello

    I had a requirement I need to calculate the total call volume between start and end date in the repository. Can someone help me with logic?

    Thank you

    Try this

    BOX WHEN DATE BETWEEN START_DATE AND END_DATE THEN

    END OF COUNT (CALL_VOLUME), 0 OTHERWISE.

    Thank you

    Sasi nanou...

  • Facts of priority / dimension

    Hello

    I have problem with my data display. I have created (for example) a star composed of two facts and two-dimensional. Star look like this:

    F1 / F2 - facts

    D1 / D2 - dimensions

    Joins:

    F1-> D1 and F1-> D2

    F2-> D1 and F2-> D2

    It's good work, but if I want to display in only analyze the column of TWO DIMENSIONS, I have a problem. For example I get the unit D1 and D2 category and does not show this point of data view is correct because when I check SQL that was executed he uses F1 to display data. But I want to use F2 you view this data, BUT I can't add column of F1 / F2 to analyze. I want to use F2 because with this fact, I have more data. Why was elected a random fact or whether it is a priority which are applied?

    I check with more facts/dimensions and made only in this case, it is used.


    Thanks for help or suggestions.

    Hello

    Try to use the column property is implicit in the presentation catalog properties. It will help to choose the table of events manually.

    Thank you

    Prasanna

  • Several facts and consistent dimensions / nonconfirmed

    Hi all

    There has been a lot of posts on this issue, I've read a lot about this, but still can not get this to work. We are looking for a basic marketing operation where we can follow the links that were clicked in email marketing that have been sent. What I have is two fact tables, with a dimension in line with each other and one of the facts with a dimension not compliant:

    Fact 1 Sun - related links
    Fact 2 Sun - related links. Dim - Email name;

    In fact, I've defined a measure that counts the number of links clicked 1
    In fact 2, I defined a measure that counts the number of links

    So I can't take fields of Sun - Email name and fact 2 this properly will show me the number of links in this e-mail. I can add in the name of the Sun link - links to give me the details of the links in the email. However, when I then add the number of links clicked of the fact 2, it is shown as zero. Withdrawal of the name Email will cause the number of clicks to display correctly for each link.

    I read this post here:

    report based on 2 different fact tables

    which seems to contain my exact problem, but the listed solution did not work for me. I created hierarchies, set the LTS of fact 1 retail for Dim - links and the LTS in fact 2 detail for Dim - Dim - Email name and links. It does not work. I then put the LTS in fact 1 total for Dim - Email name. It does not work. I then put the LTS to the dimension tables to be detail in every case, and this does not work either. My business issue is quite simple: for each email list links and the number of times the link has been clicked.

    I started from scratch, I seek only to these 4 logical tables, I've got to the stage where I'm BI reboot after each change, but I still don't see the problem. Can someone give me some advice please?

    Thank you
    Matt

    Matt,

    Just a small change more...

    / * The single fact table now columns as two, one a separate count on linkid, and the other a number on the clicksid * /.

    Given that clicksid is a source is 1 that has no mapping to Dim Email, for this column value mapping contained level Email Total.
    That is to say, double-click your count (clicksid)--> go to the tab levels--> set Email name Dim at the Total level. Note to all levels of rest must be left untouched (unselected).

    This South do the trick...

    Blackburn

  • Arrangement for two dimensions in tileList control Possible?

    Hello
    Can someone tell me, is it possible to organize the image controls two dimensions in a TileList control, so that we could get clues for children according to the rows and columns that we want to get the image in row 2 and column 5 and get the location? If so, if give me an example please... I need this help very urgent

    The container Tile and TileList are designed specifically to not give you this control - you are supposed to simply mix in the components and they appear one after the other until an edge is reached then a new row or column is created.

    If you want this type of control, use a DataGrid and itemRenderers. That has the row and column indexes.

  • Two filters in two dimensions without constraining the fact table

    Hi all

    does anyone know how to avoid the factual constraint when you create a report with two filters on different dimensions?

    I have a fact table big with more than 10 million lines. In the starmodel is the customer of the dimension and the products. I create a filter on the customer atrribute 'Status' and set to 'active '. Now I add the "Product Type" column of the dimension 'Product' in the filter section. When I want to choose a value OBIEE executes a select statement in the fact table. So I have to wait very long to select a value. Is it possible to say OBIEE only to select the dimension table without joining the fact table?

    Thank you much in advance.

    Kind regards
    Stefan

    Use is implied.

    Create a table of facts of the DUMMY and make also implied made for this dimension column. It will solve the problem.
    http://obiee11gqna.blogspot.com/2011/01/implicit-fact-column-in-OBIEE.html

    Published by: MK on January 17, 2012 07:08

    Published by: MK on January 17, 2012 07:08

  • Problem: two tables of facts and a dimension in accordance with

    Hello world!

    I need solve this situation:

    I have two fact tables, say F1 and F2, which are both linked to D1, my dimension in line
    I just need to select fields of D1, but I know that, when querying, OBIEE links to a table of facts anyway... How is it chooses the fact table? In other words, if I want to only fields D1, not the system also queries of F1 or F2? What is a random choice?

    Is there a way to "force" this choice, saying the system for example to choose only from F1?

    Is there a work around to resolve this situation? Remember, I only need fields D1.

    Thank you!!

    The solution to your problem is "column name".
    Go to the layer of presentation and double click on your domain. Then you will see name column option. Click on set. give the corresponding column actually it (in your column of fact give deal F1)

    References: http://oracle-bi.siebelunleashed.com/articles/implicit-fact-column/
    Thank you
    GSR

    Published by: GSR on 20 March 2012 15:22

  • Two dimensions, a fact

    Hello guys,.

    The last few hours I tried to solve the following problem:

    I have a small set of data that contains three tables, two tables of a dimension and a fact table. The first dimension table is a table calendar (for now, I'll call this table D1), the second dimension table holds locations (named: D2) and the third table (fact) (named: F1) holds the invoice data. What I would normally do, is to build the following template:

    D1 - F1 <>- D2

    It works very well that as long as I just want to know the places where there is data of the invoice, so far nothing is wrong.

    But when I want to know for each year (data from D1) where there was (from D2) I only return results when the invoice data in F1 there (of course, there is a relationship between D1 and D2, the year column).

    I tried to solve this problem by doing the following things:
    -Use a table alias (from D1) joined D2
    -Use join types different - it works for the connection between F1 and D2 until D1 is not added to the source of the table
    -Using different data sources in the business layer
    -Join the D1 to D2 and F1 in the physical layer

    But so far I'm stuck with the same problem: I want to query two tables of dimension without a fact table, removing the results when the fact table contains all the data from one of the dimension tables.

    Is there something that I am on or am I asking something that is simply not possible?

    Thanks in advance,

    Dennis

    Hi Dennis,

    If your dimension of location D2 also contains a column "year"? Isn't it a little strange?
    Anyway... If this is the case, you might see table D2 as a logical fact, with two logical dimensions table: D1 and D2.
    Then, you can create a measure based on this new logical fact table and use it as a fact implicit in your area. By doing this, the BI server will use D2 to D1 and D2 table instead of the invoice fact table.

    Kind regards
    Stijn

  • Two Tables of FACTS, some common Dimensions and common

    Hello to all, question, I'm sure you have met in the past, but always wanted to get your opinion.

    I have a few FACT tables and dimensions that are shared (common size). Rest of the dimensions are related to one or the other FACT tables.

    What is the best way to present a view where users CAN pull information from both tables?

    I managed by pulling the shared dimensions (common) on the tables of BOTH FACTS and having the same grain, but this view breaks down when I pull information from a Dimension that does not much to do with another.

    What is the best way to present it? Should it be broken down in three areas?

    Business line 1-> some Dims-> FACT Table has
    Area 2-> some Dims-> Table of FACTS B

    AND

    Business line 3-> * only commune Dims *-> Table of FACTS A & B Table of FACTS?

    Your comments are always appreciated.

    Kind regards

    Published by: user10679130 on October 12, 2009 15:27

    Start by checking the forum for similar discussions/questions.

    Join two tables of facts different dimensions in the single logical table
    http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/08/joining-two-fact-tables-with-different.html

    This solution maintains two tables of facts in the same area in the logical table is unique, with municipalities and non-common dimensions.

    Concerning
    Goran
    http://108obiee.blogspot.com

  • Join two facts with a dimension

    Hello

    Hello Experts, I am report on 2 groups of fact.
    Postal history and booking.
    The common dimension only between the 2 is the Dimension of the person. I created hierarchies and defined the content of aggregation in the LTS. It helps me in the reports using any column of the facts or a whole dimension of one of the groups of fact. But if I select 2 or more dimensions, one or more of each group of fact, then the report gives and error. A general error occurred. [nQSError: 14026] Unable to navigate the requested term: MailingHistory Campaign.Campaign name. Correct metadata consistency warnings. (HY000)

    For example: BookingDim - BookingFact-MailingHistoryFact (ok) MailingSourceDim - BookingFact-MailingHistoryFact works (ok), but BookingDim - BookingFact-MailingHistoryFact - MailingsourceDim (failure).

    When I apply the filter to the fact 1. I get this error. (which is the column in the second fact 2 table). I checked all the joins in the MDB layer.

    Please help me!

    Thank you
    Surya

    Hi Surya,

    Have you seen the following posts about it?

    Goran Ocko has a beautiful here: "unite our two tables of facts different dimensions in the single logical table.
    http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/08/joining-two-fact-tables-with-different.html

    And Kurt Wolff wrote a piece related to this as well: "when done Tables Do not join all the Dimension Tables.
    http://kpipartners.blogspot.com/2009/08/when-fact-tables-do-not-join-to-all.html

    Hope these are useful.

    Jeremy

  • Is mapping dimension AWM - possible to load the data in two tables of entry?

    Hi all

    I have two tables ProductFamily (parent level) and products (child level).

    I want to load a dimension of those tables where the parent-child relationships are maintained (I use AWM).

    I created a map with these two entry tables, but the loaded data has no relationship.
    So, how do I do that? Is it possible to load dimensions where different levels get data from multiple tables?
    Is any type of Carpenter available in AWM?

    Thank you

    ------------------------

    A few Notes:

    -I don't want to use OWB here that my data are clean
    -In AWM, when I loaded the data in a single view that contains two tables of input data, it worked fine. But it's my worst case option.

    You must use Dimension option in snowflake in the mapping screen of size for the Product Dimension (as opposed to the default style mapping - star schema dimension).

    This will modify map entries to include a separate parent for each level of hierarchy level / that is to say, for each level of hierarchy / (unless a higher level of the hierarchy), you must specify the parent level key in addition to the key current level, code/name/description/other attributes etc.

    You can make the mapping or... use the icons at the top of the map screen.
    mode drag/drop by dragging the relational column on dimension - level/hierarchy/attribute model
    -or-
    the table expression mapping mode that gives the same effect... by dragging a column on an attribute defined in the .

    . the format of .

    HTH
    Shankar

    Note1: Complete the mapping of a sudden... B & w switching mapping modes cause the mappings to reset.
    NOTE2: assumes that your data are correct foreign key table parent level: ProductFamily exists in the child level table: products.

  • website valid W3C, initially no error reported by the developer toolbar. But by right clicking (giving the menu validation), the toolbar reports two errors: width and height. Despite the fact that each page is posted! The forum for the toolbar, this i

    website valid W3C, initially no error reported by the developer toolbar. But by right clicking (giving the menu validation), the toolbar reports two errors: width and height. Despite the fact that each page is posted! The forum for the toolbar, it's supposed to be a browser error. So, how can it be fixed? I use FF 3.6.6

    This has happened

    Each time Firefox opened

    is after upgrade to 3.5?

    http://chrispederick.com/forums/viewtopic.php?PID=8239#p8239

    You create a new profile and install only the extension Web Developer, as recommended Chris?

  • How can I put two pictures together so that I could make a poster, including the two photos?

    Original title: Photo

    How can I put two pictures together so that I could make a poster, including the two photos?

    Hello

    What operating system do you use?

    You can do this by using paint or Windows Photo Gallery or Windows live photo gallery. See the following articles that might help you.

    With the help of paint
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/using-paint
    With the help of paint
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/using-paint
    Overview of Microsoft Paint
    http://www.Microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/proddocs/en-us/mspaint_overview.mspx?mfr=true
    Open Windows Photo Gallery
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/open-Windows-Photo-Gallery
    Windows Live Photo Gallery
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/products/features/photo-gallery

  • How to include the total number of table one fact in another fact table to calculate the percentage

    I have a fact table in the grain of each document created in any organization, say the 1st table of facts. I have another table of facts (2nd fact table) seen those documents which are considered by different commentators. grain of this second fact table is so each review, even if I document in both IDs the fact table.

    Now, I want to calculate the percentage return documents reviewed. For this I need to divide count separate from the document of performance by the total performance document. Now this document of total performance can be obtained from the 1st table of facts, but I don't get how to bring this indictment in the 2nd table of facts to show the percentage.

    Please let me know if there is no ambiguity in my question, because I'm a starter in OBIEE.

    Thank you very much.

    then you can set new logical column with two columns of fact in the formula

  • How can I prevent the CS6 Illustrator including the weight of the race in the dimensions of an object?

    How can I prevent the CS6 Illustrator including the weight of the race in the dimensions of an object?

    Custom,.

    Based on a different interpretation, namely that you wish to have the center of running the desired diemnsions and those who have reflected, uncheck the box Edit > preferences > General > use Preview Bounds.

    A real killer if not desired.

Maybe you are looking for