call quality issues

Similar Questions

• Moto G4 more call quality

  My Moto G4 more call quality is static infested intermittently, in several places as home, work and others. It sounds great when you use the speaker. It has the latest update. The questions persists even in safe mode.

  Anyone have a similar question? I wonder if it's a hardware or software problem? Should I get a replacement?

  Otherwise, I love this phone.

  Thank you.

  MonKay says:

  My Moto G4 more call quality is static infested intermittently, in several places as home, work and others. It sounds great when you use the speaker. It has the latest update. The questions persists even in safe mode.

  Anyone have a similar question? I wonder if it's a hardware or software problem? Should I get a replacement?

  Otherwise, I love this phone.

  Thank you.

  We must try to determine whether it is the President of the listener or the network. If it is intermittent, it could be. Since nobody else complained, I rule the software and focus on the network of the operator or the listener.

  If you receive a call, try hanging up and remember. If the problem disappears then probably it's the network. If 2 calls back to back are different (one good, one bad) then again I would network.

  Ear piece can be bad, but they are usually bad all the time. You could try to listen to voicemail, or see if you can get music or podcast to play through the headset - if other sounds are very well through the headset, then the problem is the network.

• No sound with phone calls, known issue?

  Has any body had this experience? Phone was working fine this morning. The person I call hear me very well, but I get nothing. Also receive nothing when I switch to speaker. The volume is completely upward. Other thin media works. When I connect my bluetooth headset, it works fine. I have tried everything; turned off the bluetooth, factory reset without restore, safe mode, etc. I get nothing.

  Unfortunately, it was my replacement phone, from their experience of the "split screen" issue

  With what you already have, I think it's time for you to call/chat with bike for a possible replacement. I hope this helps.

• quality issues

  videos in several formats, but I can't reach the quality of the original clips. (29.97 i1080) specifically of things get fuzzy, shakey, hard on the eyes to focus on when moving. should I change the sequence to progressive setting before I start editing? Do I need

  I have sony HDR-XR150 avchd files, I tried to export sequences to test with these clips in several format (mpeg-2, 264, corresponds to the order, quick time, etc.,...)

  but I can't reach the quality of the original clips (1080i 29.97). Most notabley when moving objects from get fuzzy, shakey, hard for the eye to focus on. Can I change the settings of the sequence to the pace of progress or change before I start editing? I have to convert your avchd converter files a 3rd party? What format? Or if I need to convert can I use the Media encoder that I tried earlier, but was baffled by the choices and details in the choices etc. Besides being only able to change 1 clip at a time?

  I have cc 2015, windows pro, i7-5960 X GTX Titan X, 32 GB of Ram, 1ssd, 1 hhd. If possible, dealing with issues vs having to transcode in a different setting format would be great. Plan IM having this film on my Web site for viewing online. As well as blue ray discs.

  Thank you...

  The first step is to make sure that sequence settings to match the layer Source footage. There are several ways to do so. Right-click on a clip in the project bin, select 'New Clip sequence', or click and drag an item on the icon just to the left of the trash can, which will also create a sequence of the clip "new element". With the help of these methods ensures that the frame size, frame rate and other important things that all line up, or which may affect the quality or appearance of the video.

  With regard to the export, to any clip to be played on a computer or online, you never want an interlaced video. So if the source is 1080i, when you export you will choose 1080 p or 720 p for example and which will be "Deinterlace" images and produce a Progressive output file. Use the setting 29.97 p, so the pace is not changed. All videos in line/computer should be gradual since computer screens do not play well with interlaced images. You get the pleasure of ghosts and combing and other artifacts with interlaced.

  I can't tell you who's exact export preset to use, as there are has several dozens, but some trial and error to see which produced results that look good to you, and who have an acceptable file size. A H.264 > YouTube or Vimeo HD (1080 29.97 p or 720 p 29.97) preset, can be a good starting point.

  For Blu - ray, you can use "H.264 Blu - ray" and use the pre-selection of 1080i.

  Thank you

  Jeff Pulera

  Safe Harbor computers

• Video button grayed out and call quality info says that there are too many people in the Group call

  I recently downloaded the latest version of Skype and all of a sudden I can't make video calls to group because there is too much can people in the group, but when im chat only to one person still does not work. He said I can video call a maximum of 10 people, when I have 7 people on the group...

  any help on this?

  

  It is a known problem with the latest version of Skype 7.0.

  http://community.Skype.com/T5/Windows-desktop-client/why-can-t-you-turn-on-video-chat-anymore-in-big...

  Uninstall version 7.0 and install the 6.21.0.104 previous version:

  http://download.Skype.com/MSI/SkypeSetup_6.21.0.104.msi

• HP Officejet Pro 8600 Plus Scan quality issue

  Hello

  I just set up my HP Officejet Pro 8600 Plus, and everything seems to work properly.  I am really disappointed by the quality of the images so, so I thought I'd see if anyone has experienced the same problem?

  The scanned images are very dynamic, but are too.  Detail is lost in the scan either because the brightness, or because the scanner is not properly using the resolution I have him ask to scan (600 dpi).  I have tried various different brightness and contrast settings in the scan dialog, nothing helps.  Printing HP and Scan Doctor reported no problem.  Increase the resolution of scanning on the 8600 is not helped either.

  I joined a segment of an image of the 8600 and a lot cheaper all-in-one I expected to replace, a canon mp630.  I have bought the 8600 because the scanner component had good reviews, but based on my experience, that I'm starting to have my doubts!

  Please let me know if you think there's nothing I can do to improve the quality of the scans?

  I use Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit.

  Thank you

  Pete

  8600 scan 600 dpi (Note lack of paper grain)

  

  Canon MP630, 600 dpi (capture of paper grain, wash the details)

  

  Unfortunately, I must point out that the replacement was no better.  It's a real shame, old flat scanner HP I was replacing with the ACM was high quality, but the Pro 8600 scanner was simply not enough good.

  Ultimately I exchanged for another manufacturer MFP that produces a large part analysis better (even if printing is not as good).

  I had much rather have paid more for a higher quality scan on the HP, but this option is not available to me, which is a shame!  On the 8600 Pro scan color reproduction was great, but there not only to capture the details.

  You can adjust for color problems in the software, but if the detail is not captured, you can't put it in!

• Function call libraries issues

  Hello

  I have a software development kit that I work with who provides (atmcd64d.lib and atmcd64d_internal.lib) .lib files and. DLL of the same name files that are located in my (x 86) /Program Files / National Instruments/LabVIEW 2013 / user.lib directory. I have a master .VI that contains lots of VI of this library. However, when I try to load the VI, it tries to find the. DLL file. I find manually the. DLL file for her. When loading, however, I get errors all my sub VI telling me that they are not executable due to an error.

  Follow this error all the way to the root, and I find that the library function node call said that the "library not found or failed to load." However, I can't change this library function node because it is in a VI that is in a library. So, I can't just point each VI to the appropriate library.

  I think the problem is that the. DLL is not directed to the correct libraries. How can I find out where the. DLL is indicative that the s VI pick up their libraries of the Labview? Should this I back?

  I would be very happy to provide all the necessary information. Thank you for your help,

  In addition, your files have 64 in their names (indicating that they are 64-bit dll?), but the path is in Program Files (x 86), indicating that your LV is 32-bit. I'm pretty sure you cannot load 64-bit dll into a 32-bit process, but I don't have the experience to say what would happen if you actually try.

• call dll issue

  Hello

  now I need to call a dll named SajetConnect.dll, this dll will create logfile and ini file automatically when I call.

  Attached VI call this dll, there is no log file and ini file created, but the exe file that I'm building this VI work well for her.

  I also call thie dll using c# and it still work fine.

  So it seems that some path setting question went from me, thanks for your help to take a look for my trouble, thank you!

  attached list

  2. without title vi VI

  New Folder\123\Application.exe create JOURNAL SAJET. INI SajetConnect.ini when you run this exe to call DLLs

  Without seeing the source code of the DLL there is very little we can do, but shooting in blue. And I have no balls to spare in this at the moment, except maybe the DLL tries to create these files in the directory where the executable. This would be the directory where the labview.exe deveopment environment. But given that Windows Vista users don't have write access to this directory more. Some features of the INI file are virtualized in these versions of Windows and redirected to a specific shade of the user location, but only if your application uses files INI of Windows API functions. Otherwise write access fails just and you won't see them unless you manage these errors in some way and proceed to the appellant.

• Lightroom 4: beginners about Jpeg quality issues, settings, and workflow etc.

  I'm about to start editing pictures and using Lr (4) for the first time. This is why I have a plethora of questions about JPEG and Lr 4 files. I apologize in advance for the obscene length and perhaps bad English.

  I currently shoot RAW, but I have thousands of JPEG files. I would like to avoid losing the quality of JPEG images (by re-record and recompression unnecessarily) and be able to manage and edit them as efficiently as possible.

  Could you please confirm or correct the following assumptions:

  1 Lightroom 4 only re-record and re-compress JPEG images when you export the. So there's no loss of quality, no matter how much and how many times you change (in the develop module or by altering the metadata by adding keywords etc.) before exporting it. In addition, the exported file is a copy and the original is left as is, then you can continue to work on the photo without loss in Lr.

  2. the metadata record (recording manually or have the "Automatically write changes into XMP" - option on) to the XMP space inside the JPEG file does not cause re-record and recompression of JPEG in a way that would result in losses of quality (it only changes the image of the file part).

  3 point number 2 is true even if you choose to include parameters in the metadata to develop by turning 'Include develop settings in metadata in JPEG, TIFF, and PSD files'.

  4. recording of metadata in JPEG format changes the date for change as indicated in the Finder. There is no way to avoid this parameter or dresser.

  5. "automatically write changes into XMP" and "Parameters of development to include it in the metadata in JPEG, TIFF, and PSD files" must be turned off, unless you plan to edit these files in another program that includes the data (for example another copy of Lr, Photoshop, Bridge etc.).

  6 original JPEG can be exported without recompression and loss of quality by choosing export as originals. In this case, no retouching (balance of whites etc.) will be visible, but the changes in the metadata will be present (only) if the metadata has been saved in the JPEG described in points 2 and 3.

  7 JPEG files can be renamed to import or later without recompression and quality loss (even if this information is not only stored in the Lr catalog because the name is also changed in Finder etc.).

  8. There is no advantage to convert a JPEG to a lossless (i.e. DNG) format if you plan to change them in Lr and then export the final versions.

  9 goal profiles only work on RAW images. However, you can change lenses profiles to make them fully applicable to JPEG as well. All you need to do is change "True" to "False" in the following line of the XMP file:

  [stCamera:CameraRawProfile] True [/ stCamera:CameraRawProfile]

  10. the JPEG file should never be resaved in JPEG, but in Lr is not possible without exporting.

  11 create virtual copies, moving between folders etc. does not cause recompression or quality loss.

  And a few more questions:

  A. are there any (other) settings or practical should I be aware of or avoid in order to not lose the JPEG quality?

  B. Si the workflow with JPEG files are different in someway RAW workflow in order to achieve maximum quality / efficiency.

  C. is there a separate edition of the presets for JPEG and RAW files? If so, FIRST presets can be applied to the JPEG format as long as the look resulting is nice?

  (D) where can I find good profiles goal JPEG (for the K-5 of Pentax or Olympus XZ-1), free JPEG editing presets and Lr tutorials on editing of JPEG, such as how you can change certain settings without going overboard etc. ?

  Thank you in advance!

  (1) Yes

  (2) Yes

  (3) Yes, this is only additional XMP-data

  (4) Yes (it is not)

  (5) Yes, or if you want to import into another LR catalog by simply using images

  6 a Yes), without recompression and quality loss

  No. 6B), backup of metadata in the file is not necessary, it is always included in a file exported as "Original".

  (7) Yes, the result is only an o/s rename operation (not to mention that the update of the catalogue)

  (8) Yes

  No. 9 a), there are some profiles of lenses delivered with LR that work on the JPEG files and there may be some available for download

  9 (b) Yes, but the results wouldn't be fair, because JPEG rendering in camera in some cameras includes the corrections, which are already applied in the JPEG format and could lead to double correction fi a raw lentils profile is applied to the JPEG (i.e. vignetting)

  (10) Yes

  (11) Yes

  (A) is not I know (besides the export quality choice)

  (B) NO.

  Ca no.)

  Yes CB)

  DA) I can see the following lens JPEG profiles in the Adobe Lens profile Downloader:
  
  None for Olympus so. Try the Internet.

  DB) I don't know of all those specific for JPEG, I would try the Internet.

  Beat

  PS: Can I get 10 points for each question, if the answer is correct? :-)

• Call for low quality Xperia Z5 Vodafone operator

  Hello

  I have a Xperia Z5 with the latest fw 32.0.A.6.200 and with the operator Vodafone

  It sometimes happens that the call of my daughter with a Z3 Xperia with Vodafone, the stars appeal with excellent quality, very high and really clear, crystalline solid, but sometimes, after a minute or two, call quality becomes dull, as it could be closed in the medium or high frequencies and we all travel no other settings or are not moving!

  What is happening is very sad, because the situation is very bad and the differences are quickly noticed because the first call seconds quality was really good and becomes bad and together to hear the same thing...

  What we or I will?

  Call settings, I have only EQ, normal (preferring bright), but are no longer available other settings just as it was the Z3?

  Robertods88 wrote:
  A poor neighborhood of 4g, very poor, but there is!
  This is probably because of the thing that she has no 4 g so can not keep the phone in 3 g stably, just like me!

  I agree, I think that the problem is his connection and 3g unstable in its region.

• white noise during video calls

  Whenever I do a video via MSN or Skype call after the 1st minute, I get louder white noise explosion yet if I keep talking about my connection to the other end can hear me clearly and has no such interference, but the noise is unbearable so I am unable to continue the video call

  Please help because this is my only connection to my mother in Malaysia

  Hi, KongConnie,

  This issue needs to be validated in support of Skype or MSN Support

  https://support.Skype.com/en/category/tech

  http://community.Skype.com/T5/call-quality/roaring-noise-during-some-calls/m-p/81116/highlight/true#M730

  Windows Live - MSN Messenger Support

  http://windowslivehelp.com/product.aspx?ProductID=2

  The title may be concerning the establishment of a video call, but the steps may also resolve audio issues. Please let us know what happens.
  http://windowslivehelp.com/solution.aspx?SolutionID=2f68d6f8-9049-4b14-b2fc-f191f489c938

• ENVY of HP dv7 - 7243cl wireless adapter issues

  Hi all

  I have recently purchase a refurbished HP ENVY dv7-7243 CL overall I am satisfied with the product with the exception of a massive show. I have serious problems with the edge of network card range. I'm holding the phone right next to the router and I get only 3 of the 5 bars. It is not a router problem as I have several other devices that connect perfectly across the House. Any help at all is greatly appreciated.

  EDIT: I uninstalled and then reinstalled the driver, nothing helps.

  Had the same problem and support has me remove the cover back, then reconnect the wireless antennas.  Went well after that.  Suggest that you call the assistance for this info on how to do it properly.  I'm sure you will agree that it's a quality issue with a new machine.

• Could not do a monthly subscriptions even call made? can I be reimbursed?

  Hi I recently bought a monthly subscription, but I really struggled to communicate with friends via Skype monthly subscription telephone calls - and finally I just gave up, as we could not really speak this end via Skype - Skype subscription to their landline number or mobile phone number. They do not even live in a rural country, they live in the cities.
  But each time, the call quality was terrible. Both ends could not really hear what other talks end as the voice has not been transmitted continuously.

  Can I have money back guarantee, even I kept your comments, but there was no other action performed by Skype.

  Thank you

  Thanks, but it was too late so I couldn't use this normal procedure. However, I managed to find a center of discussion of the Skype team and explained the situation, and she has settled that the.

  They asked me to do this kind of report to them directly in the future, because soon, I have suffered this faulty network.

  Chat support is that when people really stuck with the problem, I thought, as this time I didn't use the refund form, which you mentioned, like, they put the time limit (only 14 days) for people to make a claim about the return.

  Thanks anyway.

• Video call does not

  When I talk to another person via Video Call my WebCam video watch is not for me or anyone I speak.
  My WebCam Logitech WebCam HD c525 and I
  Skype latest version 5.10.0.116
  and the latest Logitech drivers for my cam.
  After I finished my call (audio call works fine) I download Skype to show me video on call quality information.
  I download Skype to show video me when I don't speak quite ok, but the video stops when calling start and get my webcam tab "!" even if cam has been recognized and showed video via the dialog box call quality information.
  It's my connection speed
  http://www.Speedtest.net/result/2157728867.PNG
  and I have no problem with the connections with others (green bars)
  
  Video worked for me on earlier versions of Skype but I don't know when problems began, because I was not I use the webcam for some time and, in the meantime, I've updated Skype several times.

  I restart Windows and then, usually when the updates are.

  Video calls was not working for weeks so simple reboot wasn't the solution.
  Somehow restart in Windows safe mode helped.

  How it happened I don't know and is not important, that I will accept the reboot in SafeMode as a solution when Skype is bad conduct.

• The volume control in the mixer Volume for Skype is always set to very low for new calls.

  Hey all!

  It's really annoying to have to adjust the volume in the Volume mixer upside whenever there is a new call. I have no volume of speakers set to automatic in the options, and I have no idea what else controls the adjustment for volume.

  It is not enough that Skype (now a Microsoft product) can't understand the audio, I use as ANY OTHER program (i.e. for other programs to plug my headphones is enough sound to be redirected here but NOT for Skype. For Skype, that I have to go into settings and change the sound output device!). I use Skype for a few years due to its good call quality, but if I can't find a solution for this I have to change to another similar product.

  My system is a 64Pro of Win7.

  All ideas will be more appreciated!

  CAK

  Eureka!
  
  There is a setting in Windows 7, I don't know about other versions - (tab Communications/sounds/Control Panel that tells Windows to automatically reduce the volume of other sounds when the PC is used to place or receive calls.

  Skype is SO smart that it reduces the volume of itself too when there is an incoming call, and so all incoming calls have a lower volume.
  
  To solve the problem simply to set the option to "do nothing"...

  .. .and continue looking for alternative software replace Skype. Unfortunately Ms. are actively trying to destroy a good thing...