can associate US foreign key index?

Hello
I've searched and can't find the answer to the foregoing;
I have a foreign key table constraint; I added an index on that column
However when I ask the all_constraints under index_name to this foreign constraint, there is nothing. only when I PK/UK I deal see index associated with them;
then oracle will still associate my index finger with the FK column forced? or I need excplicity pair with the foreign key column? If so, how?
THX
Rgds

When you do "I added an index on that column;" you "associate explicitly" a column with an index.
You can check this with

select *
from all_ind_columns

But there is no direct relationship between a FK constraint and index

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Difference between the foreign key index and secondary index

    Hello

    Suppose we have two primary databases,

    Employee (id, company_id)

    Company (id, name)

    (where: the employee of the company is one to many, and I use the collections API)

    If we want to perform a join between the employee and the company based on the ID of the company. I want to know the difference between the following two options:

    1 - construction of a secondary index on the Employee (company_id). call this index index1. Then, we use the following code:

    For each company c
    index1.get (c.ID)

    2 - construction of a foreign key on Employee (company_id) index where the database of foreign key was undertaken. call this index index2. Then, we use the following code:

    For each company c
    index2.get (c.ID)

    I have two questions:

    1 - What is the difference between these two options in terms of performance?

    2. I know that one of the benefits of the foreign key are the application of integrity constraints (CASCADE, CANCEL, etc. to DELETE). That declare a foreign key to give me any advantage when I want to do a join? (for example a quick method, or a single statement to a join)

    Thank you
    Wait.

    It doesn't matter what the example, the only advantage of a foreign key index (above, the benefits of a secondary index) is that it imposes of foreign key constraints. There is no other advantage to a foreign key index.

    -mark

  • foreign key index

    I read a book on the index, he said
    You should almost always index foreign keys because they are frequently used in joins. In addition, if you intend to delete or update unique or primary keys on the parent table, you should index the foreign keys to improve the locking of child records.
    what I don't understand, I should create index on the foreign key in parent-child table or table column or both?

    Thank you

    Hello

    806540 wrote:
    I read a book on the index, he said

    You should almost always index foreign keys because they are frequently used in joins. In addition, if you intend to delete or update unique or primary keys on the parent table, you should index the foreign keys to improve the locking of child records.
    

    what I don't understand, I should create index on the foreign key in parent-child table or table column or both?

    They mean that you need to create an index in the child table, that is the table that contains the foreign key constraint.

    In order to have a foreign key constraint, it must have a primary key constraint, or a unique constraint on the column, or columns referenced in the parent table. Either type (primary key or unique) automatically creates an index, so there is nothing more you need to do in the parent table.

  • Master detail form can not insert foreign key

    Hello

    I Master detail form, in the data block master, I Header_ID primary key and it is generated through trigger on the main table and this field is found in the data block but is hidden on the Web, this Header_ID is a key in another table, on the form, I created the main form and has also created the good relationship. now, when the new record is inserted, the Header_ID in the main table is filled properly while in the secondary table that goes with the NULL value. I have no idea how to solve this problem, any help will be appreciated

    Rather than use a database trigger, select INSERT before triggering in the basic data block to fill the HEADER_ID.

    In the before INSERT trigger, you'd have a line like:

    select seq.nextval into :MASTER.HEADER_ID from dual;
    

    When you do this in the before INSERT trigger will fill the element in the block MASTER that feeds in turn the question into the DETAILS or blocks.

  • To index foreign keys in 11 g?

    Hello

    We are on 11.2.0.2 on Solaris 10. A day back I had a mistake in our application due to a blockage. The trace file indicates that a single sql and the table. The table involved is a parent to a child table table and the foreign key of the child table is not indexed. What is the reason for the deadlock? Are foreign keys should be indexed in 11g also?
    Note that the trace file has this statement: ("" the only resource deadlock: block the queue blocking himself, f 0 ' ").

    It's the statement recorded in the trace file:
     delete from tab1  a where exists (select 1 from tab1 where col1 = a.col2 and col3 = :1) . 
    Here the col1 is a key to parent to an another table tab2 which has the same col1 column, but it is not indexed.

    (I changed the names of the tables and columns to remove our specific details of the app).
    Parts of the trace deadlock below:
    Trace file /oracle/diag/rdbms/wdb1/wdb1/trace/wdb1_ora_278.trc
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, Automatic Storage Management, OLAP,
    Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/product/database/1120/db1
    *** MODULE NAME:(JDBC Thin Client) 2012-09-14 16:36:08.865
    *** ACTION NAME:() 2012-09-14 16:36:08.865
     
    Single resource deadlock: blocking enqueue which blocks itself, f 0
    Granted global enqueue 0xdb5663e8
    ----------enqueue 0xdb5663e8------------------------
    lock version     : 30995
    Owner inst       : 1
    grant_level      : KJUSERCW
    req_level        : KJUSERPW
    bast_level       : KJUSERNL
    notify_func      : (nil)
    resp             : 0xdceae518
    procp            : 0xdb128fe8
    pid              : 27775
    proc version     : 505
    oprocp           : (nil)
    opid             : 27775
    group lock owner : 0xdc7979a0
    possible pid     : 27775
    xid              : 5F000-0001-00000E46
    dd_time          : 10.0 secs
    dd_count         : 0
    timeout          : 60.0 secs
    On_timer_q?      : Y
    On_dd_q?         : Y
    lock_state       : CONVERTING 
    ast_flag         : 0x0
    Open Options     : KJUSERDEADLOCK 
    Convert options  : KJUSERGETVALUE 
    History          : 0x4951495a
    Msg_Seq          : 0x0
    res_seq          : 170
    valblk           : 0x00000000000000000000000000000000 .
    user session for deadlock lock 0xdb5663e8
      sid: 468 ser: 14425 audsid: 82131588 user: 67/MIGRATION
        flags: (0x41) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
        flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
      pid: 95 O/S info: user: grid, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 27775
        image: oracle@cdlt3f002db01
      client details:
        O/S info: user: wasadmin, term: unknown, ospid: 1234
        machine: cdldvjassvap050.nj.adp.com program: JDBC Thin Client
        application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660
      current SQL:
      delete from tab1  a where exists (select 1 from tab1 where col1 = a.col2 and col3 = :1)
    Requesting global enqueue 0xdb9011b8
    ----------enqueue 0xdb9011b8------------------------
    lock version     : 36319
    Owner inst       : 1
    grant_level      : KJUSERCW
    req_level        : KJUSERPW
    bast_level       : KJUSERNL
    notify_func      : (nil)
    resp             : 0xdceae518
    procp            : 0xdb1335c0
    pid              : 27778
    proc version     : 388
    oprocp           : (nil)
    opid             : 27778
    group lock owner : 0xdf6b9908
    possible pid     : 27778
    xid              : 51000-0001-000010E9
    dd_time          : 0.0 secs
    dd_count         : 0
    timeout          : -910947.0 secs
    On_timer_q?      : N
    On_dd_q?         : N
    lock_state       : CONVERTING 
    ast_flag         : 0x0
    Open Options     : KJUSERDEADLOCK 
    Convert options  : KJUSERGETVALUE 
    History          : 0x14951495
    Msg_Seq          : 0x0
    res_seq          : 170
    valblk           : 0x0000000000000000b81190db00000000 .
    user session for deadlock lock 0xdb9011b8
      sid: 259 ser: 13977 audsid: 82131589 user: 67/scott
        flags: (0x41) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
        flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
      pid: 81 O/S info: user: grid, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 27778
        image: oracle@cdlt3f002db01
      client details:
        O/S info: user: wasadmin, term: unknown, ospid: 1234
        machine: cdldvjassvap049.nj.adp.com program: JDBC Thin Client
        application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660
      current SQL:
        delete from tab1  a where exists (select 1 from tab1 where col1 = a.col1 and col2 = :1)
    ----------resource 0xdceae518----------------------
    resname       : [0x159a5][0x0],[TM][ext 0x0,0x0]
    hash mask     : x3
    Local inst    : 1
    dir_inst      : 2
    master_inst   : 2
    hv idx        : 121
    hv last r.inc : 66
    .....
    .....
    .....
    Published by: orausern on Sep 17, 2012 05:03

    Published by: orausern on Sep 17, 2012 05:04

    So I think you have your first suspect.

    It is always helpful if you can come up with a script to reproduce the problem outside the application and then test that the foreign key indexing fixes the problem.

    I hope that you would be able to lead to a test that relate to what your application is doing - you may have to really follow the sessions to discover all of the States involved.

    But for something completely artificial:

    SQL> create table parent
      2  (col1 number not null primary key);
    
    Table created.
    
    SQL> create table child
      2  (col1 number not null references parent(col1) on delete cascade
      3  ,col2 number not null);
    
    Table created.
    
    SQL> insert into parent values(1);
    
    1 row created.
    
    SQL> insert into parent values(2);
    
    1 row created.
    
    SQL> insert into parent values(3);
    
    1 row created.
    
    SQL> insert into child values(1,1);
    
    1 row created.
    
    SQL> insert into child values(2,2);
    
    1 row created.
    
    SQL> commit;
    

    Session 1:

    SQL>  update child set col2=col2+1 where col1 = 1;
    
    1 row updated.
    
    SQL> 
    

    Session 2:

    SQL> update child set col2=col2+1 where col1 = 2;
    
    1 row updated.
    
    SQL> 
    

    Session 1:

    SQL> delete from parent where col1=1;
    

    Session 2:

    SQL> delete from parent where col1=2;
    

    Which translates this in session 1:

    delete from parent where col1=1
                *
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
    

    And this in the blocking file (which is simpler than your own WFG):

    DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
    
    [Transaction Deadlock]
    
    The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
    deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
    or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
    information may aid in determining the deadlock:
    
    Deadlock graph:
                           ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
    Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
    TM-0007cb4a-00000000        34     642    SX   SSX       35     706    SX   SSX
    TM-0007cb4a-00000000        35     706    SX   SSX       34     642    SX   SSX
    
    session 642: DID 0001-0022-000003EC     session 706: DID 0001-0023-0000031C
    session 706: DID 0001-0023-0000031C     session 642: DID 0001-0022-000003EC
    
    Rows waited on:
      Session 642: no row
      Session 706: no row
    

    And an index on (col1) child not cause this problem.

    As I have said, but a little artificial...

    Published by: Dom Brooks on 17 Sep 2012 14:18

  • Indexes and foreign keys

    Hi, we have a RAC Oracle 10 g 2 EE on SLES10.

    I have tables with 300.000.000 of records. These paintings clues because it access it takes very very slow. I check what he need an index for each foreign key. I have a lot of tables and I'm looking for some tools or SQL or similar phrases that tell me, tables for each foreign key index. For example, I need to know what a lot of index left complete me the process and that it.

    Table A
    ID (PK)
    B1_ID
    B2_ID
    C_ID
    D_ID
    ...
    ...

    (B1_ID, B2_ID) FK TO TABLE_B
    (C_ID) FK IN TABLE C
    (D_ID) FK TO TABLE_D


    I create the index in table A, table B, but I don't have the index for the table C and table.

    I have a lot of tables, with several foreign keys.
    How can I find out what indexes that I need to create?

    Thank you very much.

    You can also refer to http://blog.go-faster.co.uk/2007/10/tm-locking-checking-for-missing-indexes.html

    HTH
    Anand

  • Indexing foreign keys

    Is it still considered good practice to the foreign key indexes? I use 11g.

    Prohan wrote:
    Is it still considered good practice to the foreign key indexes? I use 11g.

    Yes, even for foreign keys, you can create indexes and as result you will get effective carry out the plan. It's good practice.

  • Find foreign keys are not indexed

    Hello world

    did anyone out there has a sql script that learns the foreign keys of a table are not indexed?

    I was going to write a sql for it, but then I thought that someone somewhere must have written before...

    DB: 10gR 1 and R2

    Thks

    This sql is courtesy of the asktom.oracle.com site.

    To find the script you find «unindexed foreign keys»

    When you run it, it will generate a report such as:

    SQL > @unindex

    STAT... TABLE_NAME COLUMNS COLUMNS
    ======== ============ =========== ========
    APPLICATION_INSTANCES AI_APP_CODE
    OK EMP DEPTNO DEPTNO

    The * in the first line shows me that I have a foreign key that is not indexed in the APPLICATION_INSTANCES table. Ok in the second row shows me that I have an EMP table with a foreign key indexed.

    column constraint_column format a20 word_wrapped
    column index_column format a20 word_wrapped
    column table table_name format a30 word_wrapped

    Select decode (b.table_name, NULL, ' *', 'ok') status.
    a.table_name, a.columns constraint_column, b.columns index_column
    Of
    (select table_name substr (a.table_name, 1, 30),
    substr(a.constraint_name,1,30) constraint_name,
    Max (decode (position, 1, substr(column_name,1,30), NULL)).
    Max (decode (position, 2, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 3, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (4 position ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 5, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (post, 6, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 7, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 8, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 9, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 10, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 11, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 12, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 13, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 14, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 15', ': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position, 16, ',' | columns substr(column_name,1,30), null))
    user_cons_columns a, b user_constraints
    where a.constraint_name = b.constraint_name
    and b.constraint_type = 'R '.
    substr(a.table_name,1,30), substr(a.constraint_name,1,30)),
    (select table_name, index_name substr (index_name, 1, 30) substr(table_name,1,30),
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 1, substr(column_name,1,30), NULL)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 2, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 3, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 4, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 5, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 6, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 7, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 8, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 9, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 10, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 11, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 12, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 13, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 14, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 15, ',': substr (column_name, 1, 30), null)).
    Max (decode (position_colonne, 16, ',' | columns substr(column_name,1,30), null))
    of user_ind_columns
    Group of substr (table_name, 1, 30), substr (index_name, 1, 30)) b
    where a.table_name = b.table_name (+)
    and b.columns (+) like a.columns. '%'
    /

  • Hide columns or foreign keys to achieve a structural diagram less frequented

    Is this possible?

    You can hide the foreign key (lines) in the subview diagram (DM (3.3). Masking of the columns will be available in the next version of 3.3 DM.

    Philippe

  • actually logical foreign keys

    Hello

    Can I define foreign keys in the logical fact table? I need to use '= count distinct aggregation rule' column of the foreign key in my reports.

    Thank you.

    Andy

    Hi Andy,.

    You can add foreign keys to your fact table as a measure column (aggregate distinct count).

    Do not use these foreign keys to create foreign key joins in the logic layer. Always use complex joins (http://obibb.wordpress.com/2010/08/06/joins-in-oracle-bi-ee/)

    Good luck

    Daan Bakboord
    http://obibb.WordPress.com

  • Lost after activation of the version foreign key relationship tables

    I created 2 tables to test this: approach the table and the Customer table that has a column AddressId referencing the Id primary key column in the Address table.

    So I ran the following statement in pl/sql developer:

    Start
    dbms_wm. EnableVersioning (' address, customer ', 'VIEW_WO_OVERWRITE');
    end;

    Then I couldn't find the foreign key in the table customer_lt or. What's not here?

    Thanks for any clue.

    -Nico-

    Hello!

    which is expected. OWM manages foreign in their own country keys when you encounter tables enabled version, that's why you don't see them anymore.
    Please see Chapter 1.9 ('constraint with Workspace Manager support') in the documentation for more information.
    When you open a DDL session on a version-enabled table, you can see the foreign keys on the temporary table _LTS. It is also the only way later on Add/Remove foreign key constraints.
    Apart from this, you can use the views ALL_WM_RIC_INFO or USER_WM_RIC_INFO to display foreign key metadata.

    hope that helps.

    Kind regards

    Andreas

  • Create Foreign Key forced in Warehouse Builder

    Hello world

    Yet once I need your help, please.
    My question is: Warehouse Builder is a way to create relationships between the Dimension Tables and one fact Table?
    I give you a simple example:
    We have produced paintings, customer, sales. So product and customer become a dimension table and sales become a fact table. In this fact table, we store the product_table_key, the customer_table_key and the messure of sale itself.
    If we think of datamodeling aspects our relationship 1: n between product_dimension_table and fact_table and also a relationship 1: n between customer_dimension_table and fact_table.
    How can we create these reports in the Warehouse Builder?
    If we design the objects of SQL database, we could create the need forced like that:
    Fact_table ALTER TABLE ADD (REFERENCES of KEY FOREIGN (customer_dim_fk) customer (customer_table_key));

    Please let me know how we can treat them in Warehouse Builder. I don't want to create which restricts manually in SQL Developer later.
    Thank you very much!

    Kind regards
    David

    Hi David,

    You can create the foreign key in OWB.
    An example of comprime1 that is created or imported in OWB.
    Open the T1 table in the data editor.
    Click constraints
    Type a name for the constraint
    Set the foreign key type
    Choose the local column on which you want to create the FK
    Now goto reference tab and choose the table and column (PK) whereby the CF should have a reference.

    She's.
    Save and generate the table T1 script you will have something similar to the following

    ALTER TABLE '' ADD CONSTRAINT '' FOREIGN KEY ('')
    REFERENCES "" ("");

    You can do a lot of settings on this FK in Table T1---> configure---> foreign keys

    Thank you
    Fati

  • Question on foreign key

    Hello

    I have a question about foreign key. When we create an index on a foreign key index name are displayed in the column index_name dba_constraints DD.

    But the name of the index associated with the primary key is displayed.

    Why so much?

    Thanks in advance.

    Unique or Primary Key cannot guarantee the uniqueness of a column with an Index on that column. That's why Oracle will create an Index by default if there is no such thing as an index on that column all to utter those two constraints. If an index is always associated with these two constraints.

    But no foreign key guarantees uniqueness on a column. And an Index on a foreign key is not required. So even if you create an index on a foreign key column that index is not associated with the foreign key.

  • How to associate an index with a foreign key constraint

    I understand how to associate a primary key constraint or a Unique key constraint index...
    Yet I don't see how to associate the index of a foreign key constraint. Is this possible?

    Thank you
    Bob Larsen

    Hi Bob,

    In Data Modeler, physical model for Oracle primary and unique keys dialog boxes offer an Index field using, which is used to generate the 'using_index_clause' in the DDL for primary and Unique key constraints.
    However the Oracle Database DDL does not have the "using_index_clause" for Foreign Key constraints, thus Data Modeler does not provide this feature for foreign keys.

    So, you will need to create a separate Index that uses the same columns as the foreign key (using the index page of the table properties dialog box in the relational model).

    David

  • Strange problem deadlock (no foreign key not indexed)

    Hello
    We are on 11.2.0.2 on Linux. There is a blockage in our database (I first checked that no foreign key is not indexed). This impasse has this type of data in the alert file (after it cuts a lot). Can anyone suggest what might be the cause?
    --FROM Alert log: "Global Enqueue Services Deadlock detected. More info in file....trc"
    --below from trace file:
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, OLAP, Data Mining
    and Real Application Testing options
    ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/product/database/1120/db1
    System name:     Linux
    Node name:     NODE1
    Release:     2.6.32.59-0.3-default
    Version:     #1 SMP 2012-04-27 11:14:44 +0200
    Machine:     x86_64
    Instance name: db02
    Redo thread mounted by this instance: 0 <none>
    Oracle process number: 12
    Unix process pid: 17454, image: oracle@db01 (LMD0)
    
    
    *** 2012-09-16 00:54:00.094
    *** SESSION ID:(181.1) 2012-09-16 00:54:00.094
    *** CLIENT ID:() 2012-09-16 00:54:00.094
    *** SERVICE NAME:() 2012-09-16 00:54:00.094
    *** MODULE NAME:() 2012-09-16 00:54:00.094
    *** ACTION NAME:() 2012-09-16 00:54:00.094
     
    * Load Monitor used for high load check 
    * Old Low - High Load Threshold Range = [0 - 0] 
    * hlcpu 5 (kjihpc 5), slpct 90, llpct 75 
    * New Low - High Load Threshold Range = [30720 - 40960] 
    
    *** 2012-09-16 00:54:02.690
    KSXPCINI: kjxgnpub KSXP 2.2.0GESR000 13, 0
    
    *** 2012-09-16 00:54:11.168
    ftd (4) received from node 1 (84 5.0/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    * kjxhvmaph: domain 0 valid = 1 according to instance 1 
    ftd (6) received from node 1 (84 7.0/0.0) 
    
    all ftds received 
    ftd (19) received from node 1 (84 20.0/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    * Initialize deadlock detection * 
    ftd (21) received from node 1 (84 22.0/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (23) received from node 1 (84 22.0/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    
    *** 2012-09-16 00:54:11.460
    * kjxpnpgoh: PnP Go Ahead received from 1 (pnp inc 84) 
    
    *** 2012-09-16 00:54:31.988
    Begin DRM(399) (swin 1) - AFFINITY transfer pkey 4.1 to 2 oscan 1.1
    kjiobjscn 1 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.31/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (33) received from node 1 (84 0.34/5.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (35) received from node 1 (84 0.36/6.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (37) received from node 1 (84 0.38/7.0) 
    all ftds received 
    2012-09-16 00:54:32.061349 : 
    
    * End DRM for pkey remastering request(s) (locally requested)
    
    *** 2012-09-16 00:55:02.914
    2012-09-16 00:55:02.914301 : Setting 3-way CR grants to 1 global-lru off? 0
    2012-09-16 03:00:44.727542 : Setting 3-way CR grants to 1 global-lru off? 0
    
    *** 2012-09-16 03:04:25.696
    Begin DRM(400) (swin 0) - AFFINITY transfer pkey 74335.0 to 2 oscan 0.0
    kjiobjscn 1 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.30/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    
    
    
    * kjxftdn: break from kjxftdn, post lmon later 
    ftd (37) received from node 1 (84 0.38/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.31/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (33) received from node 1 (84 0.34/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (35) received from node 1 (84 0.35/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    
    
    * kjxftdn: break from kjxftdn, post lmon later 
    ftd (37) received from node 1 (84 0.38/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.30/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    
    (repeated such entry removed)
    * End DRM for pkey remastering request(s) (locally requested)
    
    *** 2012-09-17 07:20:51.111
    Begin DRM(401) (swin 0) - AFFINITY transfer pkey 88491.0 to 2 oscan 0.0
    kjiobjscn 1 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.31/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.30/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    
    
    * kjxftdn: break from kjxftdn, post lmon later 
    ftd (33) received from node 1 (84 0.34/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (35) received from node 1 (84 0.36/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    
    * kjxftdn: break from kjxftdn, post lmon later 
    2012-09-17 07:20:51.407739 : 
    
    * End DRM for pkey remastering request(s) (locally requested)
    
    *** 2012-09-17 22:04:10.873
    Begin DRM(402) (swin 0) - AFFINITY transfer pkey 74331.0 to 2 oscan 0.0
    kjiobjscn 1 
    
    *** 2012-09-17 22:04:11.001
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.31/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (33) received from node 1 (84 0.34/0.0) 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.30/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    
    
    * kjxftdn: break from kjxftdn, post lmon later 
    ftd (35) received from node 1 (84 0.36/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (33) received from node 1 (84 0.33/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    
    * kjxftdn: break from kjxftdn, post lmon later 
    
    *** 2012-09-18 11:07:30.967
    ftd (35) received from node 1 (84 0.36/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (37) received from node 1 (84 0.38/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    2012-09-18 11:07:30.973676 : 
    End DRM(405) for pkey transfer request(s) from 1
    ENQUEUE DUMP REQUEST: from 1 spnum 12 on [0xf0008][0x24a0],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0] for reason 3 mtype 0
    
    *** 2012-09-18 17:14:20.114
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER/HOLDER: block level 3 res [0xf0008][0x24a0],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
    ----------resource 0xc2bc3f50----------------------
    resname       : [0xf0008][0x24a0],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
    hash mask     : x3
    Local inst    : 2
    dir_inst      : 2
    master_inst   : 2
    hv idx        : 124
    hv last r.inc : 84
    current inc   : 84
    hv status     : 0
    hv master     : 1
    open options  : dd 
    grant_bits    : KJUSERNL KJUSEREX 
    grant mode    : KJUSERNL  KJUSERCR  KJUSERCW  KJUSERPR  KJUSERPW  KJUSEREX
    count         : 1         0         0         0         0         1
    val_state     : KJUSERVS_NOVALUE
    valblk        : 0x00000000000000000000000000000000 .
    access_inst   : 2
    vbreq_state   : 0
    state         : x0
    resp          : 0xc2bc3f50
    On Scan_q?    : N
    Total accesses: 2652
    Imm.  accesses: 2516
    Granted_locks : 1 
    Cvting_locks  : 1 
    value_block:  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    GRANTED_Q :
    lp 0xd0f7e510 gl KJUSEREX rp 0xc2bc3f50 [0xf0008][0x24a0],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
      master 2 gl owner 0xd5df5688 possible pid 19261 xid 53000-0002-00000286 bast 0 rseq 125 mseq 0 history 0x4977d495
      open opt KJUSERDEADLOCK  
    CONVERT_Q: 
    lp 0xd0f7e6e0 gl KJUSERNL rl KJUSERPR rp 0xc2bc3f50 [0xf0008][0x24a0],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
      master 2 owner 1  bast 1 rseq 207 mseq 0x1 history 0x77d497ad
      convert opt KJUSERGETVALUE  
    ----------enqueue 0xd0f7e510------------------------
    lock version     : 89
    Owner inst       : 2
    grant_level      : KJUSEREX
    req_level        : KJUSEREX
    bast_level       : KJUSERNL
    notify_func      : (nil)
    resp             : 0xc2bc3f50
    procp            : 0xdb10cc20
    pid              : 17454
    proc version     : 0
    oprocp           : (nil)
    opid             : 17454
    group lock owner : 0xd5df5688
    possible pid     : 19261
    xid              : 53000-0002-00000286
    dd_time          : 0.0 secs
    dd_count         : 0
    timeout          : 0.0 secs
    On_timer_q?      : N
    On_dd_q?         : N
    lock_state       : GRANTED
    ast_flag         : 0x0
    Open Options     : KJUSERDEADLOCK 
    Convert options  : KJUSERNOQUEUE KJUSERNODEADLOCKWAIT 
    History          : 0x4977d495
    Msg_Seq          : 0x0
    res_seq          : 125
    valblk           : 0x00000000000000000000000000000000 .
    user session for deadlock lock 0xd0f7e510
      sid: 290 ser: 713 audsid: 82787243 user: 64/SCOTT    flags: (0x41) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
        flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
      pid: 83 O/S info: user: grid, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 19261
        image: oracle@db1
      client details:
        O/S info: user: wasadmin, term: unknown, ospid: 1234
        machine: cdldvjassvap291 program: JDBC Thin Client
        application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660
      current SQL:
      INSERT INTO tab1 SELECT x from tab2;
    
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER: initiate state dump for DEADLOCK
      possible owner[83.19261] on resource TX-000F0008-000024A0
    
    *** 2012-09-18 17:14:20.115
    Submitting asynchronized dump request [28]. summary=[ges process stack dump (kjdglblkrdm1)].
    Global blockers dump start:---------------------------------
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER/HOLDER: block level 3 res [0x150019][0x12b0a],[TX][ext 0x2,0x0]
    ----------resource 0xdcf6de80----------------------
    resname       : [0x150019][0x12b0a],[TX][ext 0x2,0x0]
    hash mask     : x3
    Local inst    : 2
    dir_inst      : 1
    master_inst   : 1
    hv idx        : 119
    hv last r.inc : 82
    current inc   : 84
    hv status     : 0
    hv master     : 0
    open options  : dd 
    Held mode     : KJUSERNL
    Cvt mode      : KJUSERPR
    Next Cvt mode : KJUSERNL
    msg_seq       : 0x1
    res_seq       : 32
    grant_bits    : KJUSERNL 
    grant mode    : KJUSERNL  KJUSERCR  KJUSERCW  KJUSERPR  KJUSERPW  KJUSEREX
    count         : 1         0         0         0         0         0
    val_state     : KJUSERVS_NOVALUE
    valblk        : 0xd0f5415aff7f00000000000000000000 .AZ
    access_inst   : 1
    vbreq_state   : 0
    state         : x8
    resp          : 0xdcf6de80
    On Scan_q?    : N
    Total accesses: 3472
    Imm.  accesses: 1369
    Granted_locks : 0 
    Cvting_locks  : 1 
    value_block:  d0 f5 41 5a ff 7f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    GRANTED_Q :
    CONVERT_Q: 
    lp 0xdb976808 gl KJUSERNL rl KJUSERPR rp 0xdcf6de80 [0x150019][0x12b0a],[TX][ext 0x2,0x0]
      master 1 gl owner 0xdc688bc0 possible pid 19261 xid 53000-0002-00000286 bast 0 rseq 32 mseq 0 history 0x495149da
      convert opt KJUSERGETVALUE  
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER/HOLDER: block level 3 res [0xf0008][0x24a0],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
    ----------resource 0xc2bc3f50----------------------
    resname       : [0xf0008][0x24a0],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
    hash mask     : x3
    Local inst    : 2
    dir_inst      : 2
    master_inst   : 2
    hv idx        : 124
    hv last r.inc : 84
    current inc   : 84
    hv status     : 0
    hv master     : 1
    open options  : dd 
    grant_bits    : KJUSERNL KJUSEREX 
    grant mode    : KJUSERNL  KJUSERCR  KJUSERCW  KJUSERPR  KJUSERPW  KJUSEREX
    count         : 1         0         0         0         0         1
    val_state     : KJUSERVS_NOVALUE
    valblk        : 0xd0f5415aff7f00000000000000000000 .AZ
    access_inst   : 2
    vbreq_state   : 0
    state         : x0
    resp          : 0xc2bc3f50
    On Scan_q?    : N
    Total accesses: 2654
    Imm.  accesses: 2517
    Granted_locks : 1 
    Cvting_locks  : 1 
    value_block:  d0 f5 41 5a ff 7f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    GRANTED_Q :
    lp 0xd0f7e510 gl KJUSEREX rp 0xc2bc3f50 [0xf0008][0x24a0],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
      master 2 gl owner 0xd5df5688 possible pid 19261 xid 53000-0002-00000286 bast 0 rseq 125 mseq 0 history 0x4977d495
      open opt KJUSERDEADLOCK  
    CONVERT_Q: 
    lp 0xd0f7e6e0 gl KJUSERNL rl KJUSERPR rp 0xc2bc3f50 [0xf0008][0x24a0],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
      master 2 owner 1  bast 1 rseq 207 mseq 0x1 history 0x77d497ad
      convert opt KJUSERGETVALUE  
    ----------enqueue 0xd0f7e510------------------------
    lock version     : 89
    Owner inst       : 2
    grant_level      : KJUSEREX
    req_level        : KJUSEREX
    bast_level       : KJUSERNL
    notify_func      : (nil)
    resp             : 0xc2bc3f50
    procp            : 0xdb10cc20
    pid              : 17454
    proc version     : 0
    oprocp           : (nil)
    opid             : 17454
    group lock owner : 0xd5df5688
    possible pid     : 19261
    xid              : 53000-0002-00000286
    dd_time          : 0.0 secs
    dd_count         : 0
    timeout          : 0.0 secs
    On_timer_q?      : N
    On_dd_q?         : N
    lock_state       : GRANTED
    ast_flag         : 0x0
    Open Options     : KJUSERDEADLOCK 
    Convert options  : KJUSERNOQUEUE KJUSERNODEADLOCKWAIT 
    History          : 0x4977d495
    Msg_Seq          : 0x0
    res_seq          : 125
    valblk           : 0x00000000000000003100050200000000 .1
    user session for deadlock lock 0xd0f7e510
      sid: 290 ser: 713 audsid: 82787243 user: 64/SCOTT
        flags: (0x41) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
        flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
      pid: 83 O/S info: user: grid, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 19261
        image: oracle@db1
      client details:
        O/S info: user: wasadmin, term: unknown, ospid: 1234
        machine: cdldvjassvap291 program: JDBC Thin Client
        application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660
      current SQL:
      INSERT INTO tab1 SELECT x from tab2; (made up )
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER: initiate state dump for DEADLOCK
      possible owner[83.19261] on resource TX-000F0008-000024A0
    
    *** 2012-09-18 17:14:20.116
    Submitting asynchronized dump request [28]. summary=[ges process stack dump (kjdglblkrdm1)].
    Global blockers dump end:-----------------------------------
    Global Wait-For-Graph(WFG) at ddTS[0.1] :
    BLOCKED 0xdb976808 3 wq 2 cvtops x1 TX 0x150019.0x12b0a(ext 0x2,0x0)[53000-0002-00000286] inst 2 
    BLOCKER 0xcc55d558 3 wq 1 cvtops x28 TX 0x150019.0x12b0a(ext 0x2,0x0)[4C000-0001-0000014C] inst 1 
    BLOCKED 0xdb7dcfc8 3 wq 2 cvtops x1 TX 0xf0008.0x24a0(ext 0x4,0x0)[4C000-0001-0000014C] inst 1 
    BLOCKER 0xd0f7e510 3 wq 1 cvtops x28 TX 0xf0008.0x24a0(ext 0x4,0x0)[53000-0002-00000286] inst 2 
    
    *** 2012-09-18 17:14:20.687
    * Cancel deadlock victim lockp 0xdb976808 
    
    *** 2012-09-18 17:14:25.028
    ENQUEUE DUMP REQUEST: from 1 spnum 12 on [0x1a0006][0x2b6e],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0] for reason 3 mtype 0
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER/HOLDER: block level 3 res [0x1a0006][0x2b6e],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
    ----------resource 0xde49c768----------------------
    resname       : [0x1a0006][0x2b6e],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
    hash mask     : x3
    Local inst    : 2
    dir_inst      : 2
    master_inst   : 2
    hv idx        : 72
    hv last r.inc : 84
    current inc   : 84
    hv status     : 0
    hv master     : 1
    open options  : dd 
    grant_bits    : KJUSERNL KJUSEREX 
    grant mode    : KJUSERNL  KJUSERCR  KJUSERCW  KJUSERPR  KJUSERPW  KJUSEREX
    count         : 1         0         0         0         0         1
    val_state     : KJUSERVS_NOVALUE
    valblk        : 0x00000000000000000000000000000000 .
    access_inst   : 2
    vbreq_state   : 0
    state         : x0
    resp          : 0xde49c768
    On Scan_q?    : N
    Total accesses: 1823
    Imm.  accesses: 1789
    Granted_locks : 1 
    Cvting_locks  : 1 
    value_block:  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    GRANTED_Q :
    lp 0xdb40f4a0 gl KJUSEREX rp 0xde49c768 [0x1a0006][0x2b6e],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
      master 2 gl owner 0xd7f08fa8 possible pid 19228 xid 46000-0002-000004A4 bast 0 rseq 32 mseq 0 history 0x4977d495
      open opt KJUSERDEADLOCK  
    CONVERT_Q: 
    lp 0xdb414320 gl KJUSERNL rl KJUSERPR rp 0xde49c768 [0x1a0006][0x2b6e],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
      master 2 owner 1  bast 1 rseq 190 mseq 0x1 history 0x77d497ad
      convert opt KJUSERGETVALUE  
    ----------enqueue 0xdb40f4a0------------------------
    lock version     : 129
    Owner inst       : 2
    grant_level      : KJUSEREX
    req_level        : KJUSEREX
    bast_level       : KJUSERNL
    notify_func      : (nil)
    resp             : 0xde49c768
    procp            : 0xdb10cc20
    pid              : 17454
    proc version     : 0
    oprocp           : (nil)
    opid             : 17454
    group lock owner : 0xd7f08fa8
    possible pid     : 19228
    xid              : 46000-0002-000004A4
    dd_time          : 0.0 secs
    dd_count         : 0
    timeout          : 0.0 secs
    On_timer_q?      : N
    On_dd_q?         : N
    lock_state       : GRANTED
    ast_flag         : 0x0
    Open Options     : KJUSERDEADLOCK 
    Convert options  : KJUSERNOQUEUE KJUSERNODEADLOCKWAIT 
    History          : 0x4977d495
    Msg_Seq          : 0x0
    res_seq          : 32
    valblk           : 0x00000000000000000000000000000000 .
    user session for deadlock lock 0xdb40f4a0
      sid: 94 ser: 2065 audsid: 82787238 user: 64/SCOTT    flags: (0x41) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
        flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
      pid: 70 O/S info: user: grid, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 19228
        image: oracle@db1
      client details:
        O/S info: user: wasadmin, term: unknown, ospid: 1234
        machine: cdldvjassvap291 program: JDBC Thin Client
        application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660
      current SQL:
      INSERT INTO tab1 SELECT x from tab2; (made up)
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER: initiate state dump for DEADLOCK
      possible owner[70.19228] on resource TX-001A0006-00002B6E
    
    *** 2012-09-18 17:14:25.029
    Submitting asynchronized dump request [28]. summary=[ges process stack dump (kjdglblkrdm1)].
    Global blockers dump start:---------------------------------
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER/HOLDER: block level 3 res [0x160016][0x9249],[TX][ext 0x2,0x0]
    ----------resource 0xdb2d6758----------------------
    resname       : [0x160016][0x9249],[TX][ext 0x2,0x0]
    hash mask     : x3
    Local inst    : 2
    dir_inst      : 1
    master_inst   : 1
    hv idx        : 51
    hv last r.inc : 82
    current inc   : 84
    hv status     : 0
    hv master     : 0
    open options  : dd 
    Held mode     : KJUSERNL
    Cvt mode      : KJUSERPR
    Next Cvt mode : KJUSERNL
    msg_seq       : 0x1
    res_seq       : 49
    grant_bits    : KJUSERNL 
    grant mode    : KJUSERNL  KJUSERCR  KJUSERCW  KJUSERPR  KJUSERPW  KJUSEREX
    count         : 1         0         0         0         0         0
    val_state     : KJUSERVS_NOVALUE
    valblk        : 0xd0f5415aff7f00000000000000000000 .AZ
    access_inst   : 1
    vbreq_state   : 0
    state         : x8
    resp          : 0xdb2d6758
    On Scan_q?    : N
    Total accesses: 1620
    Imm.  accesses: 1442
    Granted_locks : 0 
    Cvting_locks  : 1 
    value_block:  d0 f5 41 5a ff 7f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    GRANTED_Q :
    CONVERT_Q: 
    lp 0xdb682d78 gl KJUSERNL rl KJUSERPR rp 0xdb2d6758 [0x160016][0x9249],[TX][ext 0x2,0x0]
      master 1 gl owner 0xdc568020 possible pid 19228 xid 46000-0002-000004A4 bast 0 rseq 49 mseq 0 history 0x495149da
      convert opt KJUSERGETVALUE  
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER/HOLDER: block level 3 res [0x1a0006][0x2b6e],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
    ----------resource 0xde49c768----------------------
    resname       : [0x1a0006][0x2b6e],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
    hash mask     : x3
    Local inst    : 2
    dir_inst      : 2
    master_inst   : 2
    hv idx        : 72
    hv last r.inc : 84
    current inc   : 84
    hv status     : 0
    hv master     : 1
    open options  : dd 
    grant_bits    : KJUSERNL KJUSEREX 
    grant mode    : KJUSERNL  KJUSERCR  KJUSERCW  KJUSERPR  KJUSERPW  KJUSEREX
    count         : 1         0         0         0         0         1
    val_state     : KJUSERVS_NOVALUE
    valblk        : 0xd0f5415aff7f00000000000000000000 .AZ
    access_inst   : 2
    vbreq_state   : 0
    state         : x0
    resp          : 0xde49c768
    On Scan_q?    : N
    Total accesses: 1825
    Imm.  accesses: 1790
    Granted_locks : 1 
    Cvting_locks  : 1 
    value_block:  d0 f5 41 5a ff 7f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    GRANTED_Q :
    lp 0xdb40f4a0 gl KJUSEREX rp 0xde49c768 [0x1a0006][0x2b6e],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
      master 2 gl owner 0xd7f08fa8 possible pid 19228 xid 46000-0002-000004A4 bast 0 rseq 32 mseq 0 history 0x4977d495
      open opt KJUSERDEADLOCK  
    CONVERT_Q: 
    lp 0xdb414320 gl KJUSERNL rl KJUSERPR rp 0xde49c768 [0x1a0006][0x2b6e],[TX][ext 0x4,0x0]
      master 2 owner 1  bast 1 rseq 190 mseq 0x1 history 0x77d497ad
      convert opt KJUSERGETVALUE  
    ----------enqueue 0xdb40f4a0------------------------
    lock version     : 129
    Owner inst       : 2
    grant_level      : KJUSEREX
    req_level        : KJUSEREX
    bast_level       : KJUSERNL
    notify_func      : (nil)
    resp             : 0xde49c768
    procp            : 0xdb10cc20
    pid              : 17454
    proc version     : 0
    oprocp           : (nil)
    opid             : 17454
    group lock owner : 0xd7f08fa8
    possible pid     : 19228
    xid              : 46000-0002-000004A4
    dd_time          : 0.0 secs
    dd_count         : 0
    timeout          : 0.0 secs
    On_timer_q?      : N
    On_dd_q?         : N
    lock_state       : GRANTED
    ast_flag         : 0x0
    Open Options     : KJUSERDEADLOCK 
    Convert options  : KJUSERNOQUEUE KJUSERNODEADLOCKWAIT 
    History          : 0x4977d495
    Msg_Seq          : 0x0
    res_seq          : 32
    valblk           : 0x00000000000000003100050200000000 .1
    user session for deadlock lock 0xdb40f4a0
      sid: 94 ser: 2065 audsid: 82787238 user: 64/SCOTT    flags: (0x41) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
        flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
      pid: 70 O/S info: user: grid, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 19228
        image: oracle@db1
      client details:
        O/S info: user: wasadmin, term: unknown, ospid: 1234
        machine: cdldvjassvap291 program: JDBC Thin Client
        application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660
      current SQL:
      INSERT INTO tab1 SELECT x from tab2;(made up)
    DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER: initiate state dump for DEADLOCK
      possible owner[70.19228] on resource TX-001A0006-00002B6E
    
    *** 2012-09-18 17:14:25.030
    Submitting asynchronized dump request [28]. summary=[ges process stack dump (kjdglblkrdm1)].
    Global blockers dump end:-----------------------------------
    Global Wait-For-Graph(WFG) at ddTS[0.2] :
    BLOCKED 0xdb682d78 3 wq 2 cvtops x1 TX 0x160016.0x9249(ext 0x2,0x0)[46000-0002-000004A4] inst 2 
    BLOCKER 0xcefeaf70 3 wq 1 cvtops x28 TX 0x160016.0x9249(ext 0x2,0x0)[54000-0001-000000A9] inst 1 
    BLOCKED 0xdb9b6380 3 wq 2 cvtops x1 TX 0x1a0006.0x2b6e(ext 0x4,0x0)[54000-0001-000000A9] inst 1 
    BLOCKER 0xdb40f4a0 3 wq 1 cvtops x28 TX 0x1a0006.0x2b6e(ext 0x4,0x0)[46000-0002-000004A4] inst 2 
    
    *** 2012-09-18 17:14:25.667
    * Cancel deadlock victim lockp 0xdb682d78 
    
    *** 2012-09-18 18:09:23.508
    Begin DRM(406) (swin 0) - AFFINITY transfer pkey 88431.0 to 2 oscan 0.0
    kjiobjscn 1 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.30/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    
    * kjxftdn: break from kjxftdn, post lmon later 
    ftd (33) received from node 1 (84 0.34/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (35) received from node 1 (84 0.36/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (37) received from node 1 (84 0.38/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.31/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (33) received from node 1 (84 0.34/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (35) received from node 1 (84 0.36/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (37) received from node 1 (84 0.38/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    ftd (30) received from node 1 (84 0.30/0.0) 
    all ftds received 
    Published by: orausern on October 10, 2012 05:57

    Published by: orausern on October 10, 2012 05:58

    Let them show you some code. Do not believe anything they said your question don't tell not only

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem of security Apple ID

    Hi all I'm having a problem answering my Security Questions that I forgot my security questions and I'm unable to edit these sections security and Apple ID devices: 1 password 2 rescue Email 3. security issues 4 two-step verification 5. the devices I

  • How to assign other print in different Versions of Windows drivers.

    From time to time, it may be necessary to try to use another driver for printing or for test purposes, or as a work-around when the regular print driver does not work.  The following steps are only for Windows XP, Vista, 7 and 8.  I don't know the pa

  • Just upgraded to El Capitan. Shipments that do not meet standards of security of gmail

    This was supposed to have been fixed with the latest update of El Capitan, but I can't access my Gmail through the Mail from Mac program.  I get AT & T e-mail through Mac fine Mail program.  It's frustrating that h * l.  I thought I waited long enoug

  • Want to m6: unlock the Advanced Options in Bios Insyde F.36 tab

    Hi I need advanced access tab ptions in f.36 insyde bios but I don't know how to activate this tab. Can someone tell me how to do? Thank you!

  • Remove the unused characters from string

    Hi, I try to remove unused characters from a string, but I can't find a function for this. The string like: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0130 3130 3030 3030 3004 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000, I need the characters from 01 to 04. I need some ad