Can pix 515E degrade from 7.04 to 6.33?
already go to 7.04, want to return to 6.33, this issue not addressed by the link below:
concerning
Xiao hua
look further down the doc:
There is a section called «how to downgrade»
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
PIX 515e - can't view the site from the inside
Hi people
I have a PIX 515E with a Web server in the DMZ. Using a static control that is on the web with an internet address and can be viewed from anywhere outside of the firewall. But users inside can't display it, by ip address or domain name. Would be grateful for any help on the access for this list
Thank you
Oops...
I did not understand how you want this configuration...
It should work...
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094aee.shtml#DMZ
-
Hello
7.0 (1) version pix
ASDM version 5.0 (1)
I have a situation where you go paas-thanks to the VPN feature goes on our PIX 515E. I tried to put this on the pix using a VPN Wizard Site to site
who is enabled. I was unable to connect to the pix from the remote site. Witch's journal replied negotiate the pix is OK and the success
The problem is when I try to set up the tunnel to the top of the remote site. I fall without failure.
where can I see the vpn pix for error log?
is there a manual for the solution of site to site VPN using the wizard
Help, please.
Thanks in advance
the section 'use adsm' (step 14) gives an example on how to set up vpn lan - lan via adsm
Newspaper to go to the section "check".
-
Hello
I have pix 515E and I configured a VPN on it. My users connect to my network from the internet via the Cisco VPN client.
I have problem, only their LAN machine can do VPN from Cisco VPN client to my network at once.
Users are connected to the internet via an ADSL router and the LAN switch.
--------------------------------------------------
PIX Config:
6.3 (4) version PIX
interface ethernet0 car
Auto interface ethernet1
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
enable encrypted password xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx encrypted passwd
hostname ABCDEFGH
ABCD.com domain name
clock timezone IS - 5
clock to summer time EDT recurring
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
inside_out to the list of allowed access nat0_acl ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
list of allowed shared access ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
pager lines 24
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
IP address outside xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.0
IP address inside 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.2.1 - 192.168.2.254
PDM logging 100 information
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
Global interface 10 (external)
NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_out-nat0_acl
NAT (inside) 10 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server
AAA-server RADIUS (inside) host ABCDE timeout 10
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
RADIUS protocol radius AAA-server
Radius max-failed-attempts 3 AAA-server
AAA-radius deadtime 10 Server
RADIUS protocol AAA-server partnerauth
AAA-server partnerauth max-failed-attempts 3
AAA-server deadtime 10 partnerauth
partnerauth AAA-server (host ABCDEFG myvpn1 timeout 10 Interior)
Enable http server
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 20 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value
map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map
card crypto client outside_map of authentication partnerauth
outside_map interface card crypto outside
ISAKMP allows outside
ISAKMP key * address 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0
ISAKMP identity address
part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 8
ISAKMP strategy 8 3des encryption
ISAKMP strategy 8 md5 hash
8 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP life duration strategy 8 the 86400
part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10
ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption
ISAKMP policy 10 sha hash
10 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400
vpngroup myvpn address vpnpool pool
vpngroup myvpn ABCDE dns server
vpngroup myvpn by default-field ABCD.com
splitting myvpn vpngroup split tunnel
vpngroup idle 1800 myvpn-time
vpngroup myvpn password *.
Telnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 5
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
dhcpd address 192.168.1.200 - 192.168.1.254 inside
dhcpd dns ABCDE
dhcpd lease 3600
dhcpd ping_timeout 750
field of dhcpd ABCD.com
dhcpd outside auto_config
dhcpd allow inside
Terminal width 80
--------------------------------------------------
Thanks in advance.
-Amit
Try to add the "isakmp nat-traversal" command to your PIX. I suspect what happens is that Remote LAN users is translated to a single IP address as they pass through the DSL connection. I also assume that the machine doing the translation has a capacity of IPSec passthrough. Linksys routers would be a good example of this type of NAT device that allows IPSec pull-out.
If that's the case, that a single VPN connection will be able to operate both. The above command will turn PIX detect clients that are located behind a NAT device, and then try to configure the VPN sessions in UDP packets and so to work around the limitation of NAT and IPSec passthrough device.
-
When I use ASDM to administer my PIX-515E (v7.0), I get messages from 2 following error if I update the screen after being inactive in the session for about 2-3 minutes about:
Error message 1
ASDM is temporarily unable to communicate with the firewall.
Error message 2
ASDM is unable to reach the PIX. Please check the configuration and your connection and try again by clicking the Refresh button.
These messages were recently and I don't know why. Is there an ASDM idle session time-out setting? I could not found.
Thank you
Bill Fanning
Hello
What version of Java are you using. If you have Java 1.6, can you go back to 1.5 and see if the problem goes away.
Also, here is the URL indicating the operating system for client PC and browser requirements
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/docs/security/ASA/asa70/asdm50/release/notes/RN505.html#wp231810
I hope it helps.
Kind regards
Arul
* Please note all useful messages *.
-
I got some new PIX 515E security infra-red and I had sex 2 questions about everything I tried. I installed a 5 port switch inside and cannot ping anything from the console. I have a computer on the switch, and he is able to ping other devices on the switch, but not the PIX.
What I find strange is that when I try to ping from the inside interface on the PIX of one inside computers, PIX displays the MAC address of the computer inside in the arp table.
My goal is to upgrade the PIX to ver7.0 but I can't do so until I can solve this problem.
Here are some information among the PIX.
#sh worm
Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (4)
Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 3.0 (2)
Updated Saturday 2 July 04 00:07 by Manu
pixfirewall up to 29 minutes 33 seconds
Material: PIX-515E, 128 MB RAM, Pentium II 433 MHz processor
Flash E28F128J3 @ 0 x 300, 16 MB
BIOS Flash AM29F400B @ 0xfffd8000, 32 KB
Hardware encryption device: VAC + (Crypto5823 revision 0 x 1)
0: ethernet0: the address is 0015.625a.f7da, irq 10
1: ethernet1: the address is 0015.625a.f7db, irq 11
2: ethernet2: the address is 000d.8810.902c, irq 11
3: ethernet3: the address is 000d.8810.902d, irq 10
4: ethernet4: the address is 000d.8810.902e, irq 9
5: ethernet5: the address is 000d.8810.902f, irq 5
Features licensed:
Failover: enabled
VPN - A: enabled
VPN-3DES-AES: disabled
The maximum physical Interfaces: 6
Maximum Interfaces: 10
Cut - through Proxy: enabled
Guardians: enabled
URL filtering: enabled
Internal hosts: unlimited
Throughput: unlimited
Peer IKE: unlimited
This PIX has a failover license only (FO).
#sh run
interface ethernet1 100full
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
pixfirewall hostname
domain testlan
access-list acl_out permit icmp any one
No external ip address
IP address inside 192.168.1.222 255.255.255.0
No IP failover outdoors
No IP failover inside
#sh int e1
interface ethernet1 'inside' is up, line protocol is up
The material is i82559 ethernet, the address is 0015.625a.f7db
IP 192.168.1.222, subnet mask 255.255.255.0
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit full duplex
Hi M8,
Your firewall has a license of FO, you must enable this device to be able to see it.
Run the command:
active failover
With this command, the device turns into the 'Active' from a perspective of failover state. It will work after that.
See you soon.
Salem.
-
Hello
I have a PIX 515E current of execution to 7.
Is it possible to use VPN with only 1 static IP address from the ISP (no gateway or the ip address of the ISP router is provided).
I can set up routing on the ADSL modem, but then the PIX does not have a valid Internet IP address?
I think that v7 does not support PPPOE? so I can't set the mode on the bridged adsl modem?
Is there a way to fix this?
Any help appreciated gratefully.
apply the commands below:
ISAKMP identity address
ISAKMP nat-traversal 20
If the problem persists, then please post the entire config with ip hidden public.
-
I am a new user and I'm trying to configure a PIX 515e Ver 6.3 (3). How can I give my users inside access to my webfarm located on dmz1. I am able to access the test sites inside and outside dzm1. I can't access the Web inside dmz1 sites. Here is my current config:
6.3 (3) version PIX
interface ethernet0 100full
interface ethernet1 100full
interface ethernet2 100full
Automatic stop of interface ethernet3
Automatic stop of interface ethernet4
Automatic stop of interface ethernet5
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
nameif ethernet2 dmz1 security50
nameif ethernet3 intf3 securite6
nameif ethernet4 intf4 security8
ethernet5 intf5 security10 nameif
enable password xxxx
passwd xxxx
hostname pix1
apprendrefacile.com domain name
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
names of
aetest name 10.10.10.1
name 10.10.10.2 aetest1
name 13.13.13.3 aetestdmz
name 13.13.13.4 aetestdmz1
access-list from-out-to allow tcp any any eq www
pager lines 24
opening of session
debug logging in buffered memory
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
dmz1 MTU 1500
intf3 MTU 1500
intf4 MTU 1500
intf5 MTU 1500
IP address outside the 12.x.x.x.255.255.0
IP address inside 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
IP address dmz1 13.x.x.x.255.255.0
No intf3 ip address
No intf4 ip address
No intf5 ip address
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
no failover
failover timeout 0:00:00
failover poll 15
No IP failover outdoors
No IP failover inside
no failover ip address dmz1
no failover ip address intf3
no failover ip address intf4
no failover ip address intf5
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
public static 12.12.12.15 (inside, outside) aetest netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
public static 12.12.12.16 (inside, outside) aetest1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
(dmz1, external) 12.12.12.17 static aetestdmz netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
(dmz1, external) 12.12.12.18 static aetestdmz1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
Access-group from-out-to external interface
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 12.12.12.1 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
Enable http server
http 10.10.10.207 255.255.255.255 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
Telnet 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 20
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
Terminal width 80
Cryptochecksum:XXXXX
: end
Thank you... Jay
with pix v6.x, nat/global or static is a must do before the pix will start to transfer packets between two interfaces.
the current static instructions do not cover the translation between the inside and the dmz. as the traffic between pix inside the net and dmz is private, I suggest you to set up no. - nat between the two.
for example
static (inside, dmz1) 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
clear xlate
in the above example, pix inside the host must be able to access the dmz Server pointing to the private ip address of dmz Web server.
If you prefer the pix inside the host to access the dmz by name server, then "alias" command should be applied.
for example
alias (inside) 13.13.13.3 12.12.12.17 255.255.255.255
the need for the command "alias" is due to the fact that when pix inside the host tries to access the server dmz by name, the public dns will point to the public IP address of the dmz Web server. now, as the static electricity created for the dmz Web server is directional i.e. public ip will be accessible from the outside, not the pix inside the net. so the 'alias' command will allow the PIX to manipulate the dns response and point the name to the private ip of Web server dmz for the pix inside the host.
-
PIX 515e, multiple VIRTUAL networks on a physical interface to DMZ
We try to set up multiple VIRTUAL networks on a physical interface to the DMZ on a PIX 515e.
The goal is to have logical subnets linked to our single, physical interface DMZ.
Here's what I've tried so far without success:
The switch
-created the vlan 30
-added switchports fa0/1 to 30 of vlan
-attached host 192.168.100.1 in fa0/1
-added switchport fa0/24 to the vlan 1 and vlan 30 with multimode
-interface PIX DMZ connected to fa0/24 switchport
-attached host to switchport fa0/10 172.16.1.55 (vlan 1)
PIX:
Auto interface ethernet2
logical ethernet2 vlan30 interface
nameif DMZ security50 ethernet2
nameif vlan30 dmz2 security50
address IP DMZ 172.16.1.254 255.255.255.0
IP address dmz2 192.168.100.254 255.255.255.0
Results:
-172.16.1.55 has full connectivity to the PIX and beyond.
-192.168.100.1 cannot ping the PIX to the 192.168.100.254 or anything else besides.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Also, I realize that I could buy a four port NIC and use the physical interfaces, but I can't get the approved purchase.
Thank you
Creation of VLANS on Ethernet1
We want to create a new interface VLAN - VLAN30 and name DMZ2. Also affect the security level 50 in it.
Step 1: Create a physical Interface:
PIX (config) # interface ethernet1 vlan2 physical
Step 2: Name the Interface and set the security level:
PIX (config) # nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
Step 3: Assign the IP address of the interface:
PIX (config) # ip inside 192.168.1.1 address 255.255.255.0
Step 4: Create the logical Interface:
PIX (config) # interface ethernet1 vlan30 logical
Step 5: Name of the Interface and set the security level:
PIX (config) # nameif vlan30 DMZ2 security50
Step 6: Assign IP address to the interface:
IP pix (config) # DMZ2 192.168.100.254 255.255.255.0
Step 7. Switch, set the port where from the inside, to the Isls or dot1q physical interface. Place the sheath in the native vlan2 as in step 1.
-
IPSEC VPN between Pix 515E and 1841 router
Hi all
BACKGROUND
We have implemented a site to site VPN IPSEC between a Pix 515E 8.0 operation (4) and an 1841 using static IP addresses at both ends. We used CCP on the router and the ASDM the pix to build initial tunnels. Now the site with the router is evolving into a dynamic IP address from the ISP so we have implemented dynamic DNS to update dynamic IP address.
PROBLEM
The problem is that ASDM will not allow us to set a domain as the address of peers, it will not accept an IP address. We believe that the solution will be to remove the static Crypto map and replace it with a dynamic Crypto map on the side of Pix. Our questions are simply; is this the best solution? can change us the original static list or is it better to delete and make a new dynamic encryption card? Y at - it a shortcut to change the config command-line? This is a real network, so just check it out before make us any changes on the live kit.
Any help much appreciated.
You don't have to change anything when the peer-address changes. The dynamic crypto map aims to take dynamic peer connections. The only thing to remember, is that only the dynamic peer can initiate the connection. And you reduce your security if you use Pre-Shared key that now you can use a generic-PSK character.
As I remember, the PIX / ASA does not support the dynamic use of FQDNs for peer-resolution. This feature is supported in IOS.
For a feature, it would be preferable to static IP addresses on both sides.
-
4240 IPS blocking queries with Pix 515E
I have activated the lock on the 4240 and put locking as our Pix 515E. When I look at the Configurations of Signature quite a few Signature Actions are set to alert only produce. If blocking is enabled you also go and the Actions of signing the Deny value or TCP Reset? So far my attackers show dosen't IPS refused and he detected the high level of traffic which I assume must now be blocked. Thanks John
Yes, go under the signatures that you want and enable blocking for them as an action. Globally blocking configuration (setting the blocking device, the interface, the connection of the device information, etc.), does not actually blocked on the sensor itself, we must still go and activate the blocking of this particular signature. When this particular GIS fires in the future, the sensor it will block on the device that you configured.
Be very careful with blocking, the reason that we're not blocking simply all the signatures, it is that it would be very dangerous to blindly add access lists to a device that will stop traffic. You must first make sure that you don't get any number of false positives on the signatures and end up blocking valid traffic. In addition, on a busy sensor you could easily overrun detector and locking to writing and deleting 1000's of top access lists. And finally, although probably not, blocking can even be used as an attack denial of service, where an attacker, if they know what signatures you block, can usurp packages past your sensor so that it denies traffic to our legitimate guests.
You have to look at what signatures you really want to block, and then enable blocking on them individually.
-
Cisco VPN Client Authentication - PIX 515E-UR
Hi all
I need your expert help on the following issues I have:
1. I would like to create more than 1 client VPN on my PIX-515E groups. This is so that I can give a different part of the internal network access to different type of VPN connection. For example, I want a group to have no XAUTH, while the other group must use RADIUS XAUTH. Is it possible for me to do this? I see the PIX automatically enable RADIUS on both groups of VPN clients.
2. the RADIUS server is a Microsoft ISA with IAS server and it is located on the PIX inside interface. The VPN endpoint is external interface of the PIX. Is there a problem with this Setup? Do I need to have the RADIUS server that is located on the external interface?
3 can. what command I use to debug RADIUS authentication?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Hi vincent,.
(1) you can use the vpngroup *-authentication server ipaddress to specify the IP address of the Radius Server on a particular group... If you do not specify this, the authentication of the user is made locally... also check for vpngroup * order of user authentication
(2) there should be no problem with the installation of your... should work fine... If the RADIUS is outdoors, it is subject to many attacks... so have it inside...
(3) use the "RADIUS session debug" or "debug aaa authentication..."
I hope this helps... all the best... the rate of responses if found useful
REDA
-
Hi all...
I have a RV320 (internal LAN 10.78.0.0/24) connection to a PIX 515E (10.10.0.0/24) using the VPN Tunnel.
The tunnel between the two is in place and working.My workstation (10.10.0.47), I can ping and connect to a server on the LAN of RV320 (10.78.0.54)
Now if I remote in the 10.78.0.54 area, I cannot ping or connect to my desktop (10.10.0.47).
However, I can ping the inside interface of the PIX 515E 10.10.0.252So what am I missing here?
The LAN is 10.78.0.0/24. Do the remote VPN pool 10.78.1.0/24. Then use 10.78.0.0/23 as the field of encryption.
-
I have a pair of PIX 515E (6.3) running in failover mode. They are currently connected to a single chassis base. We are upgrading our network with the heart, dual 6500's. Is there a way to connect each PIX to a separate kernel (1 PIX - Core1, PIX 2 - Core2) to allow a failure of the base?
Core 1 and Core 2 will have a L2 link between them. If the current active PIX is connected to Core1 and Core 1 dies, this would not lead to support PIX failover. All LAN traffic would go through Core 2, but since he does not have an active path to the active PIX 1, traffic would drop. My reasoning is correct?
Is there a way to connect the PIX to two cores running V6.3?
Hello
If you use the cable-based failover, you can change the basis of LAN failover.
Read http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix63/configuration/guide/failover.html#wp1024836
I hope this helps.
Best regards.
Massimiliano.
-
Several outbound VPN connections behind PIX-515E
I will take a PIX-515E off-site for a provision of access internet location. I have several people behind this PIX, who will have to return to the same Office VPN. One person can VPN through the PIX very well, but if someone else tries to VPN they cannot. Once the first person has disconnected for 10 minutes, then the next person can connect. I activated the NAT - T and added fixup protocol esp-ike. What can I do it wrong? Thank you.
fixup protocol esp-ike - allows PAT to (ESP), one tunnel.
Please remove this correction.
If the remote site has NAT - T enabled, then you should be able to use NAT - T and more than 1 user should be able to use behind the PIX VPN client.
See you soon
Gilbert
Maybe you are looking for
-
ReadyNAS NV + V2 Raidiator 5.3.11 starts without access
My ReadyNAS starts correctly shows the IP address on the ability of the fron and disc C:0.7/2.7 CT free but I can't access it via the front view or any other method (actions, DLNA). He correctly responds to the ping command. Raidar shows that everyth
-
I have printer HP C4680 scans and copies to the Jeg can be converted to Pdf for printing.
How to convert software for the HP C4680 printer print queue? See the topic shown.
-
I had a problem with the speed of the internet on one of my computers, then I tried a firmwareupdate since version 2.0.0.1 for 2.0.0.2 and upgrade page stopped after a while. I thought it was an auto reset of the router, but internet has always worke
-
"PC Companion" questions - help much appreciated!
Hi guys - the anyones help would be greatly appreciated! I have backup of the files in my Z3 problems before you send the phone after the insurer for repair. I dropped the phone broken screen and also broke the phones touch screen feature. It is abso
-
Signing code with permission _sys_run_headless_nostop 10.2
I am signing my app for distribution to clients and I encountered a problem. I have to use the version 10.2 of the API because that's what the customer is using. When I come to sign the app I get this error Error: Code signing request failed because