Cisco VPN Client Authentication - PIX 515E-UR

Similar Questions

• Cisco VPN Client behind PIX 515E,-> VPN concentrator

  I'm trying to configure a client as follows:

  The user is running Cisco VPN Client 4.0. They are behind a 6.1 PIX 515E (4), and I need to connect to a VPN concentrator located outside of our network. We use PAT for address translation. As far as I know, to allow ipsec through Firewall 1 tunnel, I need to upgrade the pix to 6.3 and activate "fixup protocol esp-ike.

  Is there another way to do this? I am also curious to know how much more easy/better this will work if we were dealing with pptp.

  You don't necessarily need to fixup protocol esp-ike active. The remote Hub there encapsulation NAT - T enabled so that clients behind the NAT can run?

• Problem Cisco VPN Client with local authentication

  I configured PIX for the Cisco VPN client for remote access. It must be connected and also inside network is accessible. It is without any authentication username. It works well with a vpngroup name and the password for the vpngroup, configured on PIX and also on the Cisco VPN client. (version 4.6)

  When I configure crypto for local authentication, it did not work. configuration is as follows.

  #crypto card: name of the map of local authentication client

  I created a user with private = 15.

  Client VPN must be connected, and then it pops up a window user name and password. After giving these details. The user is not authenticated.

  Are there patterns more to do in / isakmp / ipsec / aaa configurations.

  Thank you

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  client authentication card crypto remote_vpn LOCAL

  client configuration address card crypto remote_vpn throw

  client configuration address card crypto remote_vpn answer

• PIX: Cisco VPN Client connects but no routing

  Hello

  We have a Cisco PIX 515 with software 7.1 (2). He accepts Cisco VPN Client connections with no problems, but no routing does to internal networks directly connected to the PIX. For example, my PC is affected by the IP 172.16.2.57 and then ping does not respond to internal Windows server 172.16.0.12 or trying to RDP. The most irritating thing is that these attempts are recorded in the system log, but always ended with "SYN timeout", as follows:

  2009-01-06 23:23:01 Local4.Info 217.15.42.214% 302013-6-PIX: built 3315917 for incoming TCP connections (172.16.2.57/1283) outside:172.16.2.57/1283 inside: ALAI2 / 3389 (ALAI2/3389)

  2009-01-06 23:23:31 Local4.Info 217.15.42.214% 302014-6-PIX: TCP connection disassembly 3315917 for outside:172.16.2.57/1283 inside: ALAI2 / 3389 duration 0:00:30 bytes 0 SYN Timeout

  2009-01-06 23:23:31 Local4.Debug 217.15.42.214% 7-PIX-609002: duration of disassembly-outside local host: 172.16.2.57 0:00:30

  We tried to activate and deactivate "nat-control", "permit same-security-traffic inter-interface" and "permit same-security-traffic intra-interface", but the results are the same: the VPN connection is successfully established, but remote clients cannot reach the internal servers.

  I enclose the training concerned in order to understand the problem:

  interface Ethernet0

  Speed 100

  full duplex

  nameif outside

  security-level 0

  IP address xx.yy.zz.tt 255.255.255.240

  !

  interface Ethernet1

  nameif inside

  security-level 100

  172.16.0.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  access extensive list ip 172.16.0.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.2.56 255.255.255.248

  !

  access extensive list ip 172.16.0.0 outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.2.56 255.255.255.248

  !

  VPN_client_group_splitTunnelAcl list standard access allowed 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0

  !

  IP local pool pool_vpn_clientes 172.16.2.57 - 172.16.2.62 mask 255.255.255.248

  !

  NAT-control

  Global xx.yy.zz.tt 12 (outside)

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound

  NAT (inside) 12 172.16.0.12 255.255.255.255

  !

  internal VPN_clientes group strategy

  attributes of Group Policy VPN_clientes

  xxyyzz.NET value by default-field

  internal VPN_client_group group strategy

  attributes of Group Policy VPN_client_group

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list VPN_client_group_splitTunnelAcl

  xxyyzz.local value by default-field

  !

  I join all the details of the cryptographic algorithms because the VPN is successfully completed, as I said at the beginning. In addition, routing tables are irrelevant in my opinion, because the inaccessible hosts are directly connected to the internal LAN of the PIX 515.

  Thank you very much.

  can you confirm asa have NAT traversal allow otherwise, activate it in asa and vpn clients try again.

  PIX / ASA 7.1 and earlier versions

  PIX (config) #isakmp nat-traversal 20

  PIX / ASA 7.2 (1) and later versions

  PIX (config) #crypto isakmp nat-traversal 20

• Cisco VPN client, PIX, and proxy

  Hi.I have problem in my company. We have users that go through a proxy server located in the DMZ of a PIX to the internet (allowed through the ACL of the DMZ on the outside, etc.). Which works very well.

  The problem arises when they use a Cisco VPN client to connect to another company, and they can no longer access the Internet, but may work via VPN to a remote site (client has been authorized by the Cisco PIX). Everything returns to normal when they no longer use the VPN client.

  Any ideas why this would happen?

  Without the proxy, browsing the internet via the vpn connection, or split tunnel is configured and you are leaving locally. If split tunnel is configured, the ip address of proxy server can overlap with the remote protected network.

  Fortunately, it is easy for you to know how the vpn is configured, just check the route details of vpn client statistics tab.

  Verify that the routing table local pc will also help you to solve this problem.

• RSA token with Cisco VPN clients

  I am currently using the 3.6 Cisco VPN client that connects to a 6.3 (4) version Pix. I want to migrate to token SecurID from RSA to RADIUS authentication. Is this possible with these versions of the software? I could not find information on the client to support the SecureID.

  Roland,

  Yes, it is possible.

  Please see the below URL for more information:

  http://rsasecurity.agora.com/rsasecured/guides/imp_pdfs/Cisco_PIX_702_AuthMan61.PDF

  Let me know if it helps.

  Kind regards

  Arul

• Remote access VPN Client to PIX, DNS issue

  Hi all.  I searched on this, but I can't find my answer.

  I set up a VPN connection to a PIX Firewall (running the version 8.0 (4)) for my business.  The VPN connection works correctly, in that I can connect to it using my software (v 5.0.02.0090) Cisco VPN Client and ping servers/resources internal IP address. However, if I try to ping by host name, it does not resolve to an IP address.  If I open a command prompt on my PC and type ipconfig/all, there are no DNS servers for my VPN, just for my normal Intel NIC adapter - I think I should have a DNS server listed under the map of VPN, right?  Here is the relevant (I think) for the VPN config lines:

  8.0 (4) version PIX

  domain xx.xx

  DNS lookup field inside

  DNS server-group DefaultDNS

  Server name 192.168.20.23

  domain xx.xx

  IP local pool vpnpoolIT 10.10.8.2 - 10.10.8.254 mask 255.255.255.0

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac FirstSet

  Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 1jeu transform-set FirstSet

  Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 1 lifetime of security association set seconds 28800

  Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 kilobytes of life 1 set security-association 4608000

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  tunnel-group ITGroup type remote access

  tunnel-group ITGroup General attributes

  address vpnpoolIT pool

  Group-RADIUS authentication server

  tunnel-group ITGroup ipsec-attributes

  pre-shared-key *.

  Am I missing?  I can solve the DNS on the PIX itself requests.

  All the info I can find online is for an older version of the PIX software which says that I should enter the vpngroup dns- IP address of the server command, but this command is not available in my version of the software.

  Hello

  To set a DNS server to be injected into the VPN clients when they connect, you can do the following:

  This is the tunnel-group where lands the remote connection:

  tunnel-group ITGroup type remote access

  tunnel-group ITGroup General attributes

  address vpnpoolIT pool

  Group-RADIUS authentication server

  tunnel-group ITGroup ipsec-attributes

  pre-shared-key *.

  For example, create a group policy:

  internal VPN group policy
  attributes of VPN group policy

  DNS value--> x.x.x.x where x.x.x.x is the IP address of the DNS server

  Then, apply the group policy for the Group of tunnel:

  tunnel-group ITGroup General attributes

  Group Policy - by default-VPN

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• Problems to connect via the Cisco VPN client IPSec of for RV180W small business router

  Hello

  I tried to configure my router Cisco of RV180W as a customer VPN IPSec, but have encountered a problem that I hope someone can help me with. "" I managed to do the work of configuration so that the Cisco's VPN IPSec client authenticates successfully with the XAUTH user, I put on the router, but during the negotiation, the client ends with the following, which appears several times on the router error message: ' Mar 20 Oct 19:41:53 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [34360] has no config mode.

  I've read around the internet and a number of people seem to say that the Cisco VPN Client is not compatible with the router, but the same thing happens to my iPhone VPN client.

  Is it possible that this can be implemented? Below, I have attached the full configuration files and the log files. Thank you much in advance.

  Router log file (I changed the IP addresses > respectively as well as references to MAC addresses)

  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: floating ports NAT - T with counterpart > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: notification to ignore INITIAL-CONTACT > [44074] because it is admitted only after the phase 1.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for > [4500]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO-UNITY
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT detected: is located behind a device. NAT and alsoPeer is behind a NAT device
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: request sending Xauth for > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association established for > [4500] -> [44074] with spi =>.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REPLY' of > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: login successful for the user "myusername".
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser connected from the IP >
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: sending of information Exchange: Notify payload [10381]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REQUEST' of > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: ignored attribute 5
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28683
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no mode config
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28684
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no mode config
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: remove the invalid payload with doi:0.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: purged-Association of ISAKMP security with proto_id = ISAKMP and spi =>.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser Logged Out of the IP >
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:16 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association deleted for > [4500] -> [44074] with spi =>

  The router configuration

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.00_pm.png

  

  IKE policy

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.00_pm_001.png

  

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.01_pm.png

  

  VPN strategy

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.02_pm.png

  

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.02_pm_001.png

  

  Client configuration

  Hôte : < router="" ip=""> >

  Authentication group name: remote.com

  Password authentication of the Group: mysecretpassword

  Transport: Enable Transparent Tunneling; IPSec over UDP (NAT/PAT)

  Username: myusername

  Password: mypassword

  Please contact Cisco.

  Correct, the RV180 is not compatible with the Cisco VPN Client.  The Iphone uses the Cisco VPN Client.

  You can use the PPTP on the RV180 server to connect a PPTP Client.

  In addition, it RV180 will allow an IPsec connection to third-party customers 3.  Greenbow and Shrew Soft are 2 commonly used clients.

• AnyConnect + possible PSK (pre-shared key) as under with cisco vpn client ikev1 and ikev2

  Is it possible to create a VPN Anyconnect of RA with just the name of user and password + pre-shared key (Group) for the connection, as could do for ikev1 with cisco VPN client? I am running 8.4.X ASA code and looks like tunnel-group commands have 8.2.X somewhat change. If you change the group type of the tunnel for remote access, now there is no option for IKEv2 PSK. This is only available when you choose the type

  Type of TG_TEST FW1 (config) # tunnel - group?

  set up the mode commands/options:
  Site IPSec IPSec-l2l group
  Remote access using IPSec-IPSec-ra (DEPRECATED) group
  remote access remote access (IPSec and WebVPN) group
  WebVPN WebVPN Group (DEPRECATED)

  FW1(config-tunnel-General) # tunnel - group TG_TEST ipsec-attributes
  FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) #?

  configuration of the tunnel-group commands:
  any required authorization request users to allow successfully in order to
  Connect (DEPRECATED)
  Allow chain issuing of the certificate
  output attribute tunnel-group IPSec configuration
  mode
  help help for group orders of tunnel configuration
  IKEv1 configure IKEv1
  ISAKMP policy configure ISAKMP
  not to remove a pair of attribute value
  by the peer-id-validate Validate identity of the peer using the peer
  certificate
  negotiation to Enable password update in RADIUS RADIUS with expiry
  authentication (DEPRECATED)

  FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) # ikev1?

  the tunnel-group-ipsec mode commands/options:
  pre-shared key associate a key shared in advance with the connection policy

  I'm getting old so I hope that it is not in another complaint curmudgeonly on the loss of functionality. :)

  Many small businesses do not want to invest in the PKI. It is usually a pain to deploy, backup, make redundant, etc..

  But it would be nice to have a bit more security on VPN other than just the connections of username and password.

  If this is not possible, it is possible to configure the Anyconnect customer to IKEv1 with PSK and name at the level of the Group client?

  If this is not possible, WTH did cisco end customer VPN cisco as a choice of VPN connection (other than to get more fresh mail of license)?

  I really hope that something like this exists still!

  THX,

  WR

  You are welcome

  In addition to two factors, you can also do double authentication (ie the two using the user name and password). Each set of credentials can come from a Bank of different identities.

  With this scheme, you can can configure a local user name (common) with password on the SAA (think of it as your analog PSK) and the other be the AD user identification information.

• CISCO ANYCONNECT VPN CISCO VPN CLIENT

  Hi, I was in the process of configuring cisco anyconnect vpn for ip phones to our local obtained the license for them either, the question that I get is that I already have remote configured cisco connect via the old cisco vpn client.

  now, if I activate the anyconnect ssl on the same outside the interface both can exist without conflict or maybe I need to migrate users to install the end customer for anyconnect system software to connect.

  I also need help with authentication of certification.

  concerning

  You can run both VPN at the same time without problems.

  However, you should try and migrate everyone to the latest technology Anyconnect SSL anyway.

• MS RADIUS and Cisco VPN client

  We currently have with a Server Windows RAS and IAS authentication with PPTP to users.

  I want to move a hub (we have two not used) and the use of the Cisco VPN client with IPSEC 3005, also using the RADIUS (IAS) in Windows to authenticate against Active Directory.

  I have a config to work for the client and it performs authentication, but I'm afraid that you can't configure IAS to work with IPSEC, unless you configure the policy for

  "Unencrypted authentication (PAP, SPAP).

  on the Authentication tab

  and

  "No encryption".

  on the encryption tab.

  Are encrypted with IPSEC credentials to establish the tunnel of the Cisco VPN client?

  For RADIUS PAP authentication, the user name is clear and the password is encrypted with the RADIUS shared secret.

  To maximize security, you would use GANYMEDE + or IPSec transport mode and isolated VLAN. But for most of us, strong passwords and physical security prevents the RADIUS PAP to a significant weakness.

• Cisco vpn client is supported on the analogue ppp connection

  can someone pls tell me if we can use the client vpn cisco on a ppp connection analog and put a pix that is not PPPs running. If it works, then why do we need to VPN L2tp/ipsec. can someone pls tell me something abt it. It is very urgent.

  concerning

  Assane

  Assane,

  If I understand your question, you speak with PPP initially to get an IP address from your service provider, then use the Client VPN VPN in your Pix Firewall. If so, yes it is possible.

  To name a few reasons why PPTP or L2TP/IPSEC is used instead of Cisco VPN Client are:

  1. because companies have used a PPTP or L2TP/IPSEC solution for some time and are migrating to Cisco VPN

  2. do not install vpn on the PC client software

  3. won't pay for the VPN Client software licenses

  Let me know if it helps.

  Kind regards

  Arul

• Help, please! Microsoft Vs Cisco VPN Client VPN

  Could someone please indicate if the Cisco VPN Client is safer than the VPN integrated Microsoft on windows XP? If the Cisco client is more secure than why? Microsoft it does not use IPSEC and PPTP right?

  Please advise - very urgent!

  I don't know a customer Cisco Cisco VPN concentrator is safer, but I'm not sure exactly why.

  Carlton,

  Take a deeper look at the same time, all your questions will be answered once you look at these links.

  IPSec is a Cisco VPN standard, open customer or any customer VPN IPSec based should meet these standards. You'll learn more by reading these few bellow of links at the end of the reading you will be to have a better

  perspective on the customer you would gear more to use as a professional network.

  Personally, I've been away little by little PPTP and substituting Cisco VPN clients. Don't get me wrong, PPTP is still widely used there, but it is more vulnerable.

  With Ipsec VPN, you have a wider choice of authentication algorithms, to base

  granularity of ciphers as a way to implement a secure VPN extreamely for RA architecture

  Introduction to IPsec

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094203.shtml

  Introduction to PPTP/L2TP

  http://www.Clavister.com/manuals/ver8.6x/manual/VPN/pptp_basics.htm

  Analysis of vulnerabilities and implementation MS PPTP

  http://www.Schneier.com/paper-PPTP.html

  http://www.Schneier.com/paper-PPTP.PDF

  Alternative workaround to use client MS using L2TP over Ipsec

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00807213a7.shtml

  In addition, you can do a google search on "hacking PPTP" or "Ipsec" to preview more vulnerabilities.

  Rgds

  Jorge

• Cisco VPN Client and Windows XP VPN Client IPSec to ASA

  I configured ASA for IPSec VPN via Cisco VPN Client and XP VPN client communications. I can connect successfully with Cisco VPN Client, but I get an error when connecting with the XP client. Debugging said "misconfigured groups and transport/tunneling mode" I know, they use different methods of transport and tunneling, and I think that I have configured both. Take a look at the config.

  PS a funny thing - when I connect with client VPN in Windows Server 2003, I have no error. The only difference is that client XP is behind an ADSL router and client server is directly connected to the Internet on one of its public IP of interfaces. NAT in the case of XP can cause problems?

  Config is:

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/2.30

  Description remote access

  VLAN 30

  nameif remote access

  security-level 0

  IP 85.*. *. 1 255.255.255.0

  !

  access-list 110 scope ip allow a whole

  NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.10 eq ssh

  NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.26 eq ssh

  access-list extended ip allowed any one sheep

  access list nat-ganja extended permit tcp any host 10.254.17.18 eq ssh

  sheep-vpn access-list extended permits all ip 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0

  tunnel of splitting allowed access list standard 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0

  flow-export destination inside-Bct 192.168.1.27 9996

  IP local pool raccess 192.168.121.60 - 192.168.121.120 mask 255.255.255.0

  ARP timeout 14400

  global (outside-Baku) 1 interface

  global (outside-Ganja) interface 2

  NAT (inside-Bct) 0 access-list sheep-vpn

  NAT (inside-Bct) 1 access list nat

  NAT (inside-Bct) 2-nat-ganja access list

  Access-group rdp on interface outside-Ganja

  !

  Access remote 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 85.*. *. 1 2

  Route outside Baku 10.254.17.24 255.255.255.248 10.254.17.10 1

  Route outside Baku 192.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1

  Outside-Baku route 192.168.39.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.45.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.69.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.184.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

  Route outside Baku 192.168.208.16 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.10 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.208.112 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.18 1

  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT

  Crypto ipsec transform-set newset aes - esp esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac vpnclienttrans

  Crypto ipsec transform-set vpnclienttrans transport mode

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac raccess

  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 214748364

  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life security-association 214748364

  raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map

  vpnclientmap 30 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1

  card crypto interface for remote access vpnclientmap

  crypto isakmp identity address

  ISAKMP crypto enable vpntest

  ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Baku

  ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Ganja

  crypto ISAKMP enable remote access

  ISAKMP crypto enable Interior-Bct

  crypto ISAKMP policy 30

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  No encryption isakmp nat-traversal

  No vpn-addr-assign aaa

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

  SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

  SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

  SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 Interior-Bct

  internal vpn group policy

  attributes of vpn group policy

  value of DNS-server 192.168.1.3

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  Split-tunnel-network-list value split tunnel

  BCT.AZ value by default-field

  attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup

  raccess address pool

  Group-RADIUS authentication server

  Group Policy - by default-vpn

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup

  pre-shared-key *.

  Hello

  For the Cisco VPN client, you would need a tunnel-group name configured on the ASA with a pre-shared key.

  Please see configuration below:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

  or

  http://tinyurl.com/5t67hd

  Please see the section of tunnel-group config of the SAA.

  There is a tunnel-group called "rtptacvpn" and a pre-shared key associated with it. This group name is used by the VPN Client Group name.

  So, you would need a specific tunnel-group name configured with a pre-shared key and use it on the Cisco VPN Client.

  Secondly, because you are behind a router ADSL, I'm sure that's configured for NAT. can you please activate NAT - T on your ASA.

  "crypto isakmp nat-traversal.

  Thirdly, change the transformation of the value

  raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map

  Let me know the result.

  Thank you

  Gilbert

• RV120 VPN with full Cisco VPN Client?

  Is it possible to configure the RV120 for a VPN IPsec for use with the complete Cisco VPN client?

  I tried, but it does not appear to support "Goup of authentication.

  I see in the confi router I can put a PSK, but the complete VPN client seems only accecpt "Goup authentication."

  I managed on the basis for the work "Fast VPN", how it works is beyond me, because he does not appear to create an adapter with an IP address or anything on the local line, and I didn't even create a VPN policy...

  Or put another way, what alternative (Free) VPN clients are there to work with the RV120?

  Try the following link for instructions for Cisco VPN and the SA500:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/multi_function_security/multi_function_security_appliance/sa_500/TechNote/note/SA500_vpnclient_appnote.PDF

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you

  Rick Roe

  Cisco Small Business Support Center