Cisco 861 DHCP + public static IPs + NAT/DNAT. Help.

Similar Questions

• Public static political static NAT in conflict with NAT VPN

  I have a situation where I need to create a VPN site-to site between an ASA 5505 using IOS 7.2 and a Sonicwall NSA4500. The problem arises where the LAN behind the Cisco ASA has the same subnet an existing VPN currently created on the Sonicwall. Since the Sonicwall cannot have two VPN both run on the same subnet, the solution is to use policy NAT on the SAA as well as for the Sonicwall, the new VPN seems to have a different subnet.

  The current subnet behind the ASA is 192.168.10.0/24 (The Sonicwall already has a private network virtual created for another customer with the same subnet). I try to translate it to 192.168.24.0/24. The peer LAN (behind the Sonicwall) is 10.159.0.0/24. The ASA relevant configuration is:

  interface Vlan1

  IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.24.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  list of access VPN extended permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 192.168.24.0 (inside, outside) - list of VPN access

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  In addition, there are other static NAT instructions and their associated ACLs that allow certain traffic through the firewall on the server, for example:

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface smtp SERVER smtp netmask 255.255.255.255

  The problem is this: when I enter the static strategy statement NAT, I get the message ' WARNING: real-address conflict with existing static "and then it refers to each of the static NAT statements reflecting the external address to the server. I've thought about it, and it seemed to me that the problem was that policy NAT statement must be the first statement of NAT (it is the last one) so that it is run first and all traffic destined to the VPN to the Sonicwall (destination 10.159.0.0/24) tunnel would be properly treated. If I left him as the last statement, then the other static NAT statements would prevent a part of the 10.159.0.0/24 network-bound traffic to be correctly routed through the VPN.

  So, I tried first to my stated policy NAT upward in the ASDM GUI interface. However, moving the declaration was not allowed. Then I tried to delete the five static NAT statements that point to the server (an example is above) and then recreate them, hoping that would then move up the policy statement NAT. This also failed.

  What Miss me?

  Hello

  I assumed that we could have changed the order of the 'static' , the original orders, but as it did not work for some reason any then it seems to me that you suggested or change, that I proposed should work.

  I guess that your purpose was to set up static political PAT for the VPN for some these services, then static PAT of public network access, then static NAT to policy for the rest of the network in-house.

  I guess you could choose any way seems best for you.

  Let me know if get you it working. I always find it strange that the original configuration did not work.

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• IPSec Tunnel between Cisco 2801 and Netscren 50 with NAT and static

  Hello

  My problem isn't really the IPSec connection between two devices (it is already done...) But my problem is that I have a mail server on the site of Cisco, who have a static NAT from inside to outside. Due to the static NAT, I do not see the server in the VPN tunnel. I found a document that almost describes the problem:

  "Configuration of a router IPSEC Tunnel private-to-private network with NAT and static" (Document ID 14144)

  NAT takes place before the encryption verification!

  In this document, the solution is 'routing policy' using the loopback interface. But, how can I handle this with the Netscreen firewall. Someone has an idea?

  Thanks for any help

  Best regards

  Heiko

  Hello

  Try to change your static NAT with static NAT based policy.

  That is to say the static NAT should not be applicable for VPN traffic

  permissible static route map 1

  corresponds to the IP 104

  access-list 104 refuse host ip 10.1.110.10 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0

  access-list 104 allow the host ip 10.1.110.10 all

  IP nat inside source static 10.1.110.10 81.222.33.90 map of static route

  HTH

  Kind regards

  GE.

• public static nat/global vs

  Excluding an access list, what is the difference between:

  NAT (inside) 1 172.16.5.10 net 255.255.255.255

  192.168.5.10 (outside) 1 global net 255.255.255.255

  and

  static (inside, outside) 1 192.168.5.10 172.16.5.10 net 255.255.255.255

  Thank you.

  in static reality must be combined with the access list for a two-way communication... You are right in a sense that

  public static nat/global access-list =

  Basically, the rule is that the traffic is allowed more high to low infterface of default security

  BUT

  from the lowest to the highest security of communication you need an access as well as the STATIC list

  Thank you

  Nadeem

• Cisco IOS DHCP Server + classless static routes on DHCP clients

  Hi, I tried to find if it is possible to add the ability for static routes to DHCP clients on the Cisco IOS DHCP configuration mode. I'm looking to add a parameters as defined in RFC 3442, like this one, located on the ISC DHCPd server:

  Global settings:

  121 = integer table 8 code option rfc3442-classless-static-routes;

  ms-classless-static-routes option code 249 = integer table 8;

  And for the subnet declaration:

  option rfc3442-classless-static-routes 24, 192, 168, 30, 192, 168, 10, 1;

  option 24 ms-classless-static-routes, 192, 168, 30, 92, 168, 10, 1;

  Is this possible?

  Thank you!

  Vitor

  Yes, the fun part it is to convert it into a format IOS will accept.  You can try:

  IP dhcp pool 0

  option 121 24.192.168.30 ip 192.168.10.1

  option 249 ip 24.192.168.30 92.168.10.1

  If this does not work, change the "intellectual property" for "hex" and each of your decimal byte converted to hexadecimal.

• Need help to understand political static with Nat No.

  Hi all

  I have a Pix 515e with 6 interfaces. 5 interfaces are considered as internal that we don't want any translation NAT occur between them. We want only NAT between the 5 and the external interface.

  I created a No_Nat ACL successfully to not manage any portion of nat.

  What I have trouble understanding is the static command to allow traffic between higher levels to lower levels and vice versa.

  I understand the

  public static inside_address outside_address (indoor, outdoor)

  for the part of NAT translation.

  What I do not understand, this is when the inside address and address outside are the same, what order are going. For example, my inner interface (192.168.1.0/24) (sec100) is where the live servers, and I have another interface named accounting (192.168.2.0/24) (sec75).

  If I don't want no nat occurs between these two, I have the following

  No_Nat of the 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 ip access list permit

  No_Nat of the 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 ip access list permit

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access No_Nat

  NAT (accounting) 0-list of access No_Nat

  Now how can I enter the static command?

  Maybe

  static (inside, accounting) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  or

  static (inside, accounting) 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  or

  static (accounting, inside) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  or

  static (accounting, inside) 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  I do not understand the prescription for it and why it would be used one verses the other way. Is the security level determines the order? Do I need two static command, one for each direction?

  Thank you

  Denny

  Hello denny

  static can be defined in any way... its only traffic that determines what it... for example, if accounting dmz is access to any server on your inside interface, you normally want the accounting servers see the original on its public IP server inside... so, you will end up as static

  static (inside, accounting) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  only the above static command is sufficient to establish connectivity between inside and dmz accounting. u don't need 2 static on any sense...

  Similarly, if you want to inside users to access a server on the dmz accounting, you can write a static type

  static (accounting, inside) 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  hope you understand. Let us know if you need help... but normally a statement nat 0 is more than enough for the inside / dmz communication

  Kind regards

  REDA

• {} Public static

  Boy, it is difficult in 53 and feeling totally stupid, but Java can do it for me.

  I; have my head wrapped around statics and constants and static methods, and I found (thankfully) one of the examples which allowed me to analyze step by step to better understahnd the language (it's my best course).

  However, it baffles me: things wrapped in JUST {} public static.  I've been Googling like crazy, but all the explanations are either variables or class, not fopr this thing.

  Here is an example of the MemoryDemo example I discuss:

  // Statics -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  private static Random _random;  To generate random numbers for dates and channels.
  private static ubyte [] _letters; To generate random strings.
     
  // Constants -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  private static final int MIN_STRING_LENGTH = 3;   Minimum length for a random string.
  private static final int MAX_STRING_LENGTH = 10;  Maximum length of random string.
     
  public static
  {
  _random = new Random();
  _letters = new ubyte [MAX_STRING_LENGTH];
  }
  

  So, I understand not statements made by the statics and constants... no problemo.

  But what is the reasoning behind the encapsulating the _random and _letters inside the {} public static?  Is it just a kind of shorthand for something else?

  Again, I apologize for what must seem like stupid question, but I don't want to jump on something that I think moight be crucial to understand.  Thanks in advance (again)!

  -John

  I don't see why initialization that you see in this class could not be done as you suggest.

  However, there are other situations where this isn't the case.

  For example not elegant and simple (there are other better ways to dong that), you can have a static value that identifies whether the device is a touch screen,

  If you have

  public static boolean IS_TOUCH_SCREEN;

  public as well as any other class can test this just by using .IS_TOUCH_SCREEN

  {public static

  String pattern = DeviceInfo.getDeviceName ();

  If [(model.startsWith("95"))

  IS_TOUCH_SCREEN = true;

  } else {}

  IS_TOUCH_SCREEN = false;

  }

• PhoneListener cannot access a public static vars initialized in the main thread

  Using the emulator (SDK 4.7, phone model 9500)

  I have a class PhoneListener defined and recorded, he gets the phone events without any problems. It's all public static public var that is initialized in the main thread is always null when it is examined in the context of the PhoneListener callback thread, when examined in the main thread or a son they are defined.

  I guess since the PhoneListener callbacks are called from a system thread, it cannot access the battery of my request - it seems correct? is this in any way about this?

  I tried Application.getApplication () .invokeLater (...), but validated all executable from the PhoneListener recalled suffers from the same problem.

  Thanks - Lindsay

  Exactly, that's what I was wondering - I found the answer according to the PhoneListener in the MIDlet . Now I store my UiApplication object in the running store and access them from the PhoneLister to publish objects on my main application via invokeLater.

  Thank you

  Lindsay

• public static problem (inside, outside)

  I use a PIX to isolate a subnet to a corporate network.

  inside is the corporate network

  outside is not approved LAN

  A single user in LAN not approved need to go to a specific set of IP addresses in

  And all other users can browse the Internet via downstream

  proxy server to talk to the corporate proxy server

  It works fine,

  Why I can't use the static suite for this

  public static 159.182.111.0 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.0 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  problem is that I have to continue to add each ip address static statement such as

  public static 159.182.111.50 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.50 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  public static 159.182.111.60 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.60 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  public static 159.182.111.70 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.70 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  public static 159.182.111.80 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.80 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  Unfortunately this site VIEW use different IP addresses in the subnet, everyday

  Is any limitation of this ststic command at the low security access

  interface high security by using the static command

  Hi, I don't know, but the problem may be in the netmask in your static instruction,

  It must be 255.255.255.0 or so because it is a network and not a host.

  hope this helps.

• Cisco 861 ezVPN license remote problem

  I bought a new Cisco 861 SRI with safety advanced on this subject.

  When I look in the Dashboad license in Cisco Configuration professional it tells me I have advsecurity licenses with deployment status 'Deployed' function and the State 'active, in use '.

  But when I want to configure any type of VPN I get the following error message:

  License of technology (advsecurity) associated with this feature is not deployed on this router. Use the link below to deploy the technology license.

  When I click the link I find myself in the dashboard to license again.

  I Don t have another file license and advanced security features should be sufficient for VPN. At least that's what

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/routers/ps380/data_sheet_c78_461543.html said.

  What should I do to be able to configure the VPN?

  Thankx a lot for any help

  Dirk

  What version of CCP do you use?  I see a few other customer cases with this error and it looks like there may be a problem with CCP 2.5.  Customers who use 2.3 CCP do not see this error when applying the license through the user interface.

  Todd

• Public static long serialversion uid in doubt?

  Salvation in serializable classes we are declaring the serialversion as ' private public static long ' field. but when the object is serialized static values don't are not serialized, so at the other end when we are deserializing how the virtual machine works Java checks whether the serialvesrsion when it is serialized is the same as serialvesrsion in the class, when it is deserialized?

  It happened again, but not as part of a serialized instance.

• Public static LOV

  Hello!
  (Version 4.0.2 of the APEX)
  
  I need definition LOV that returns multiple values for a display value. For example, when I select the return value TV is 1, when I select RADIO return value is 2. And when I select what I want to return to the 1 and 2 values.
  
  List of values definition should be something like this:
  
  STATIC: All; (1,2), TV, 1, RADIO, 2
  
  Is this possible? Without any plugin, like SuperLov...
  
  Thank you!

  Dark salvation,

  Maybe this thread could help?

  Public static LOV

  Kind regards
  Sandro

• public static function return an object instance

  create or replace
  Item_object OBJECT TYPE IS
  (item_title VARCHAR2 (60))
  , item_subtitle VARCHAR2 (60)
  FUNCTION CONSTRUCTOR item_object
  RETURN SELF AS RESULT
  FUNCTION CONSTRUCTOR item_object
  (item_title VARCHAR2, VARCHAR2 item_subtitle) RETURN SELF AS RESULT
  , Public STATIC FUNCTION get_item_object (item_id NUMBER) ITEM_OBJECT RETURN
  MEMBER RETURN VARCHAR2 to_string FUNCTION)
  CANNOT BE INSTANTIATED NOT FINAL;
  
  
  create or replace
  TYPE item_object BODY IS
  Item_object FUNCTION CONSTRUCTOR RETURN self AS RESULT IS
  point ITEM_OBJECT: = item_object ('generic Title', 'Generic subtitle');
  BEGIN
  me: = item;
  RETURN;
  END item_object;
  Item_object FUNCTION CONSTRUCTOR
  (item_title VARCHAR2, VARCHAR2 item_subtitle)
  RETURN SELF AS RESULT IS
  BEGIN
  Self.item_title: = item_title;
  Self.item_subtitle: = item_subtitle;
  RETURN;
  END item_object;
  * STATIC FUNCTION get_item_object (item_id NUMBER) RETURN ITEM_OBJECT IS
  point ITEM_OBJECT;
  CURSOR c (NUMBER item_id_in) IS
  SELECT item_title, item_subtitle FROM point WHERE item_id is item_id_in;
  BEGIN
  I'm IN c (item_id) LOOP
  agenda: = item_object (i.item_title, i.item_subtitle);
  END LOOP;
  RETURN of goods;
  END get_item_object; *
  FUNCTION MEMBER to_string RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
  BEGIN
  RETURN ' ['|] [Self.item_title |'] ['|| [Self.item_subtitle |'] " ;
  END to_string;
  END;
  
  Impossible to compile static function get_item_object, can anyone help me please?

  user6446424 wrote:
  all instances of the object, as all the rows in the table

  I think you misuderstand objects. Objects do not come from thin air - it must exist somewhere or should be constructed from the data. Your function constructs the table utem data object. If you have any item in the table, which should be used?

  SY.

• public static const even as public static var

  Is it the same thing to use

  public static const

  as

  public static var

  technically, no.

  a const value cannot be changed.  value of var can be changed.

• How can I change DHCP to static IP address for my ESX Server?

  Hi all:

  because of my mistake, I configured the ESX for DHCP server.

  So, how can I change DHCP to static IP address for my ESX Server?

  Thank you very much.

  hihiy

  Hello

  You can assign static IP using the below command

  esxcfg-vswif - i

  Restart the network service

  restart of the #service network

  Try this command to list the IPconfig

  #esxcfg - vswif - l

  Hope this helps!