Client VPN 3.6.3.B - start before logon - connection fails immediately

Similar Questions

• After you install the updates, programs disappeared from the start menu, internet connection fails after leaving "sleep" mode and the system restore disappeared.

  Original title: most of the programs have disappeared from the start menu.

  Family Vista using premium, updates of Windows installed 10/8 then found that most of the programs has disappeared from the start, internet menu connection fails after that out 'sleep' mode and restore Sytstem disappeared.

  Help please

  Hello

  Please see below for a possible solution:

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/Windows_7-system/programs-missing-from-start-menu-in-Windows-7/507709ad-EDBB-46e7-AF44-11a64d36b854

  Also, please create a new user profile and see if the problem is there again. If this is not the case, see the following:

  Difficulty of a corrupted user profile

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/troubleshoot-problems-with-installing-updates

• Start before logon functionality

  Hi all

  I have a customer who wants to start before Anyconnect VPN connection. I can't find anything on the user experience. Is it possible to make the process transparent to the end user so that they only connect once to Windows and it will take these credentials to connect to Anyconnect as well? Do I have to use certificates for authentication? Also, is there any gotchyas I need to know?

  Xavier,

  The user normally connects, the client automatically downloads the Gina Module (EPP) and the XML profile with SBL option set to true (this during the login process).

  If the user does not notice this process.

  Keep me posted.

  Portu.

  Post edited by: Javier Portuguez

• We can connect remote vpn ipsec before logon in windows?

  can connect us to the vpn remote ipsec before logon in windows? is there an option in cisco vpn client?

  Hello Krishna,

  You can do this with the start function prior to logon.

  The following link describes the same thing:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/vpn_client/cisco_vpn_client/vpn_client500_501/release/notes/51client.html#wp1568402

  You can even activate as follows:

  VPN client > options > Windows user properties > check the box "enable start before logon".

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards
  Anisha

  P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel that your query is resolved.

• Cannot ping client VPN

  I have a problem with the software client blocking VPN traffic, for example if the client software is installed I can not ping the client or push installs the client, almost acting like Windows Firewall. On a 50 clients that I have 3 that are affected in this way, they are Windows 2000 Pro, all have the latest service packs and security patches, all are configured identically. It doesn't matter where the client is or even if they are VPN in. If they are physically on the local network the problem is the same. As soon as the software is uninstalled the problem disappears. I have tried 3 different versions of the client and it does not change the situation. Anyone had this happen before or been to a resolution?

  Thank you

  Matt

  I solved an exact problem by:

  1. If the PC is on the directly connected network, run the Client VPN software (but do not start a VPN connection), click on the meny Options and uncheck the 'Stateful Firewall '. In this way, you should be able to ping the computer. If not, then you will have to investigate the parameters of local PC Firewall (such as the personal FW, fw XP)

  2. If the PC is VPN in and you want to ping, then you will need to allow icmp traffic from the internal network to the VPN clients.

  Hope this work for you.

• Client VPN routing issue

  I am trying to configure client vpn software ver 5.0 for remote to connect to the local network behind a 1801 users.

  I can get the client saying its connected but traffic is not circulate outside in:

  When I try to ping an address 192.168.2.x behind the 1801 I get a response from the public ip address but then when I try to ping to another address I have no answer.

  I guess the question is associated with NAT.

  Here is my config, your help is apprecited

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  encryption password service

  !

  host name C#.

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  enable password 7 #.

  !

  AAA new-model

  !

  AAA authentication login userauthen local

  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

  !

  AAA - the id of the joint session

  !

  IP cef

  !

  IP domain name # .local

  property intellectual auth-proxy max-nodata-& 3

  property intellectual admission max-nodata-& 3

  !

  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

  !

  username password admin privilege 15 7 #.

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 3

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group 1801Client

  key ##############

  DNS 192.168.2.251

  win 192.168.2.251

  field # .local

  pool VpnPool

  ACL 121

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set RIGHT

  !

  map clientmap client to authenticate crypto list userauthen

  card crypto clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor

  client configuration address map clientmap throwing crypto

  client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer

  10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap

  !

  Archives

  The config log

  hidekeys

  !

  property intellectual ssh time 60

  property intellectual ssh authentication-2 retries

  !

  interface FastEthernet0

  address IP 87. #. #. # 255.255.255.252

  IP access-group 113 to

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  clientmap card crypto

  !

  interface BRI0

  no ip address

  encapsulation hdlc

  Shutdown

  !

  interface FastEthernet1

  interface FastEthernet8

  !

  ATM0 interface

  no ip address

  Shutdown

  No atm ilmi-keepalive

  DSL-automatic operation mode

  !

  interface Vlan1

  IP 192.168.2.245 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly

  !

  IP pool local VpnPool 192.168.3.200 192.168.3.210

  no ip forward-Protocol nd

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 87. #. #. #

  !

  !

  no ip address of the http server

  no ip http secure server

  the IP nat inside source 1 interface FastEthernet0 overload list

  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.251 25 87. #. #. # 25 expandable

  Several similar to the threshold with different ports

  !

  access-list 1 permit 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 113 allow host tcp 82. #. #. # host 87. #. #. # eq 22

  access-list 113 permit tcp 84. #. #. # 0.0.0.3 host 87. #. #. # eq 22

  access-list 113 allow host tcp 79. #. #. # host 87. #. #. # eq 22

  access-list 113 tcp refuse any any eq 22

  access-list 113 allow host tcp 82. #. #. # host 87. #. #. # eq telnet

  access-list 113 permit tcp 84. #. #. # 0.0.0.3 host 87. #. #. # eq telnet

  access-list 113 allow host tcp 79. #. #. # host 87. #. #. # eq telnet

  access-list 113 tcp refuse any any eq telnet

  113 ip access list allow a whole

  access-list 121 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 121 allow ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  control plan

  !

  Line con 0

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  transport input telnet ssh

  !

  end

  you have ruled out the IP address of the customer the NAT pool

  either denying them in access list 1

  or do road map that point to the loopback address as a next hop for any destent package for your pool to avoid nat

  first try to put this article in your access-lst 110

  access-list 110 deny 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 110 permit 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 any

  sheep allow 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 110

  remove your old nat and type following one

  IP nat inside source overload map route interface fastethernet0 sheep

  rate if useful

  and let me know, good luck

• ASA Windows7 and startup-before-logon problems (SBL)

  We try in vain to get Windows7 SBL working with configuration following (SBL works for XP);

  ASA5520

  ASA 8.0 (4)

  ASDM 6.1 (5)

  AnyConnect 2.4.1012

  VPN Plus license (SSL VPN peers 100)

  When you configure the group policy for Clent download optional Module we have option for vpngina and can not see module start before logon (EPP), in paragraph 2.4 of the AnyConnect Client documentation.

  Is this a problem of license type or do we need an ASA/ASDM software update?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  The following doc can be referenced on the rest of the SBL configuration:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00809f0d75.shtml

• Client VPN does not start when you use RDP

  I have a few people that RDP in Windows 2000 Server. The console client VPN starts very well (4.7 4.6 & tried). When accessing remotely via RDP, you try to start the VPN client throws the error:

  "Error 56: the Service VPN from Cisco Systems Inc. has not been started." Please start this service and try again. »

  Helpful service is started and it works very well from the console.

  If this is the case, then I guess that this version may have a bug.

  personally, I always use the v4.0.3(a). I was testing v4.6, however, it kept crashing my machine so finally that I dropped.

• Client VPN does not install

  Greetings,

  Try to install the VPN clinet version 5.0.07.0290 on WinXP box.

  Gets to a certain point then - error

  Error 27850.  Unable to manage the network components.

  The corruption of the operating system can prevent installation.

  I asked this question here before - and received responses instructioning me to uninstall the client.

  This canoe do since there is no element installed in Add / Remove programs to point to uninstall.  I deleted the folder created, but it makes no difference - each time the system stops at the same point.

  Any other ideas?

  Is your Windows XP 32-bit or 64-bit?

  There are 2 version of VPN Client 5.0.07.0290:

  32-bit: vpnclient-win-msi - 5.0.07.0290 - k9.exe

  64-bit: vpnclient-winx64-msi - 5.0.07.0290 - k9.exe

  Please, please make sure you use the right software.

  Here are the steps that will allow the uninstall:

  (1) remove the VPN Client (any version) of the machine using the MSI cleanup tool
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/290301

  Updated the DNE using this deterministic networks link
  http://www.deterministicnetworks.com/support/dnesupport.asp

  Run the WINFIX application, then the upgrade DNE.

  (2) take a backup of the registry.
  (3) on your desktop, click Start > run and type regedit.
  (4) delete the following keys:

  (a) go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE > SOFTWARE > Cisco Systems > customer VPN.
  (b) go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE > SOFTWARE > deterministic networks and remove the keys.
  Note: Sometimes the system will not allow deletion of this key.

  (c) go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE > SOFTWARE > Microsoft > Windows > CurrentVersion > uninstall > {5624c000-b109-11d4-9db4-00e0290fcac5}.
  (d) delete all the old files deterministic NDIS Extender (DNE): all files starting with DNE, as all are coming files and Client VPN facilities.

  dne2000.sys %SystemRoot%\system32\drivers
  dne2000m.inf and dne2000m.pnf of %SystemRoot%\inf

  (e) the enumeration of original manufacturers of hardware (OEM) of the dne2000.inf and dne2000.pnf files.

  The OEM enumeration .inf file is a file called ".inf oem (digital value)."
  For example, oem2.inf and oem2.pnf.

  Note: Be sure to remove only the DNE OEM files.

  dneinobj.dll % SystemRoot%\system32. You may need to reboot for this file can be deleted.

  (f) delete the following file: cvpndrv.sys to %SystemRoot%\system32\drivers

  (5) reboot the machine.

  (6) find the file CSGina.dll in the system32 folder rename it to CSGina.old

  7-restart the machine.

  (8) to disable any firewall if not installed.

  Hope that helps.

• Windows 7 x 64 support for Client VPN with SBL/PLAP

  Is it now or will it be a customer VPN Windows 7 x 64 support prior to logon Access Provider (PLAP) that replaces start them before logon (SBL)?  I understand that connect any client supports it, but the customer needs customer VPN (IPSec) rather than any connection (SSL) because of their current license on the SAA.  They have little license for SSL.

  It is possible with AnyConnect, however, there is currently no functionality SBL/PLAP for the traditional IPSec VPN on Windows 7 client. There is an improvement for this feature request, but it has not been applied and so I can't give you an idea on whether she will ever be supported, see CSCse47544.

  -heather

• Impossible to use 'Start before the Login' or maintain the connection

  Hello, we use the 3.1.02026 Version as our Cisco VPN client.

  In earlier versions, we have been able to use a feature, 'Start before connection' that would enable users to access resources network before signing in the Windows operating system (Windows 7, 64-BIT). We were also able to switch between user profiles and the VPN connection would stay alive. Now, the client will be available only after the logon Windows. I want really to have these features in order to work with remote users and reduce the risk of security problems.

  Is it possible to get this working as it should?

  In old VPN client - you were able to select this option within the VPN client. Working in Windows XP, but does not work on Windows 7. The link below will answer that question.

  AnyConnect client - you configure Cisco ASA, which will push the SBL profile with client AnyConnect. Here is the link that will help you-

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/107598-SBL.html

  I tested and deployed on Windows XP and Windows 7 and works very well. Good luck.

• Causing disconnections Windows LAN Client VPN service

  Hello

  I have a 4.8.01.0300 client installed on a machine WinXP SP2, speaking with a VPN3000 concentrator and its working very well through the VPN. My client complained however that when you use the machines with the client installed on their local network, they get notice of ongoing disconnection of their offline files and synchronize the failures. If manually stop us the service of cvpnd.exe, the problem goes away. Affecting the service manual and start the service instantly back again the issue.

  Does anyone have this seen before or know a fix?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Please check if the dynamic firewall is enabled or disabled. Please make sure that it is disabled. To check, the client VPN application and goto startup options. You should see Stateful firewall. It must be unchecked.

  HTH,

  Kamal

• Can I have a copy of KB2982791? My client VPN application

  Original title: Please, please, please can I have a copy of KB2982791? My client VPN application

  Yes, I am aware that MS has w / drew this patch.

  However, I don't have the choice. I SHOULD have the patch and am willing to take the risk. My client is a Government, and their VPN is administered by people who insist that I have this patch in order to do my job.

  Can I PLEASE have the patch? If my system has problems, I'll take the risk. I can't change my client--their admins VPN will ALWAYS REQUIRE MS PATCHES, even if MS released their.

  I implore anyone who wants to hear it.

  Computers belongs to me - I'm an entrepreneur owner unique to Montgomery Co. MD [whose] VPN is administered by people who insist that I have this patch in order to do my job.

  Well, I'm afraid that you are between the proverbial rock and hard place, my friend.

  KB2982791 was "fired" shortly before midnight (Pacific time) on August 15, 2014. KB2982791 is no longer available through Windows Update. KB2982791 is no longer available via the MS Download Center or from the Microsoft Update Catalog. In addition, Microsoft informed uninstall KB2982791 if it is currently installed.

  If the admins of the County cannot understand the FAQ update on this page...

  
  Why this bulletin has been revised August 15, 2014?
  Microsoft revised this bulletin to address known issues related to the installation of security update 2982791. Microsoft is investigating the behavior associated with the installation of this update and will update this bulletin when more information is available. Microsoft recommends customers to uninstall this update. As an additional precaution, Microsoft has removed the 2982791 security update download links. For instructions on how to uninstall this update, see Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 2982791.

  .. .you need to slam a few heads together (or contact their TAM Microsoft).

  I suspect upgrading kernel (MS14-045) re-Mode drivers - will be released very soon (for example, early next week?), probably under a new KB number. [Those who say cannot know & those who say can't know.]

  Good luck on Monday morning!

  PS: Here is the consumer, specific peer-to-peer support forums. You'd better post in Win7 IT Pro-specifiques forums-online http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/home#category=w7itpro [or in the forums partner if you are a MS Partner]

• Client VPN connectivity problems

  I use the cisco VPN client to connect to our network, located behind a 515E. The client is authenticated and gets an ip address but cannot ping or connect with one of the hosts. The connection is to a network of customers that is also behind a 515E. I have successfully connected using the same policy to other places and have had no problem. What confuses me, is that we have used to have a Netscreen firewall before and he had a netscreen vpn client which connected since their network with a problem. Is that something they need for their firewall so that we can get through the traffic?

  Try to turn on NAT - T on your pix, by setting up:

  ISAKMP nat-traversal 20

  and configure the client vpn accordingly:

  http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/471/cvpn_3k_nat.html#conf_client

  I think these discussions are useful:

  http://Forum.Cisco.com/eForum/servlet/NetProf?page=NetProf&Forum=virtual%20Private%20Networks&topic=General&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1dd7dda4

  http://Forum.Cisco.com/eForum/servlet/NetProf?page=NetProf&Forum=virtual%20Private%20Networks&topic=General&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1dd7fe80

• The VPN client VPN connection behind other PIX PIX

  I have the following problem:

  I wanted to establish the VPN connection the client VPN to PIX on GPRS / 3G, but I didn t have a bit of luck with PIX IOS version 6.2 (2).

  So I upgraded PIX to 6.3 (4) to use NAT - T and VPN client to version 4.0.5

  I have configured PIX with NAT-T(isakmp nat-traversal 20), but I still had a chance, he would not go through the 1st phase. As soon as I took nat-traversal isakmp off he started working, and we can connect to our servers.

  Now, I want to connect to the VPN client behind PIX to our customer PIX network. VPN connection implements without problem, but we can not access the servers. If I configure NAT - T on the two PIX, or only on the customer PIX or only on our PIX, no VPN connection at all.

  If I have to connect VPN client behind PIX to the customer's network and you try to PING DNS server for example, on our PIX, I have following error:

  305006: failed to create of portmap for domestic 50 CBC protocol translation: dst outside:194.x.x.x 10.10.1.x

  194.x.x.x is our customer s address IP PIX

  I understand that somewhere access list is missing, but I can not understand.

  Of course, I can configure VPN site to site, but we have few customers and take us over their servers, so it'd just connect behind PIX VPN and client connection s server, instead of the first dial-in and then establish a VPN connection.

  Can you please help me?

  Thank you in advan

  The following is extracted from ASK THE DISCUSSION FORUM of EXPERTS with Glenn Fullage of Cisco.

  I've cut and pasted here for you to read, I think that the problem mentioned below:

  Question:

  Hi Glenn,.

  Following is possible?

  I have the vpn client on my PC, my LAN is protected by a pix. I can launch the vpn client to connect to remote pix. Authenticates the vpn client and the remote pix makes my PC with the assigned ip appropriate to its pool of ip address.

  The problem that I am facing is that I can not anything across the pix remote ping from my PC which is behind my pix. Can you please guide me what I have to do to make this work, if it is possible?

  My PC has a static ip address assigned with the default gateway appropriate pointing to my s pix inside interface.

  Thank you very much for any help provided in advance.

  Response from Glenn:

  First of all, make sure that the VPN connection works correctly when the remote PC is NOT behind a PIX. If that works fine, but then breaks when put behind a PIX, it is probably that the PIX is PAT, which usually breaks IPSec. Add the following command on your PIX VPN client is behind:

  fixup protocol esp-ike

  See http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/df.htm#wp1067379 for more details.

  If it still has issues, you can turn on NAT - T on the remote PIX that ends the VPN, the client and the remote PIX must encapsulate then all IPSec in UDP packets that your PIX will be able to PA correctly. Add the following command on the remote PIX:

  ISAKMP nat-traversal

  See http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/gl.htm#wp1027312 for more details.

  NAT - T is a standard for the encapsulation of the UDP packets inot IETF IPSec packets.

  ESP IPSec (Protocol that use your encrypted data packets) is an IP Protocol, it is located just above IP, rather than being a TCP or UDP protocol. For this reason, it has no TCP/UDP port number.

  A lot of features that make the translation of address of Port (PAT) rely on a single to PAT TCP/UDP source port number ' ing. Because all traffic is PAT would be at the same source address, must be certain uniqueness to each of its sessions, and most devices use the port number TCP/UDP source for this. Because IPSec doesn't have one, many features PAT fail to PAT it properly or at all, and the data transfer fails.

  NAT - T is enabled on both devices of the range, they will determine during the construction of the tunnel there is a PAT/NAT device between them, and if they detect that there is, they automatically encapsulate every IPSec packets in UDP packets with a port number of 4500. Because there is now a port number, PAT devices are able to PAT it correctly and the traffic goes normally.

  Hope that helps.