Compare two value table

I want to compare two table value is the same, the result I want is can alert 1,5,6, but the result is now only 6

var myText1 = "1,3,5,6."

var myText2 = "+ 1, + 2, 3, + 4, + 5";

var array1 = myText1.split(",");

var array2 = myText2.split(",");

for (var i = 0; i < array1.length; i ++) {}

~ alert (array2.toString (.valueOf (array1 [i])));

If (array2. ToString(). IndexOf (array1 [i]) ==-1) {}

Alert ("havn't" + array1 [i]);

}

}

Hello

Delete "var" on line 14

1,5,6 on my side...

Jarek

Tags: InDesign

Similar Questions

  • Stored procedure to compare two data tables

    Hello

    I want to have a stored procedure that will compare two tables data (only one column) and remove the line that is not present in the second table.

    For example.,.
    I have 2 tables called Table1 and Table2, that have the same column called ID (PK).
    Data in Table1 are 1,2,3 and data into Table2 are 1.3. When the stored procedure is running, it must compare the ID column in Table1 to ID column in Table2 and since '2' is not there in Table2, I want to remove this line from Table1.

    Thanks in advance.

    delete from table1
    where does not exist (select 1 from table2 where table2.id = table1.my_field)
    ;

  • Compare column values

    Hello

    do we not have a function to compare two values of type varchar column.

    I have a table tab1
    col1 col2 
abc  abc
cde cde
efg  aba
ghi  ikl
abc abc
    I'm trying to store the result in a view...
    col1 col2 diff
abc  abc  true
cde cde  true
efg  aba  false
ghi  ikl   false
abc abc  true
    How can this be achieved through the function or query.

    Thank you.

    BTW, all the posted solution do not consider NULL values:

    SQL> with t as (
  2             select 'abc' col1,'abc' col2 from dual union all
  3             select 'cde','cde' from dual union all
  4             select 'efg','aba' from dual union all
  5             select 'ghi','ikl' from dual union all
  6             select 'ghi',null from dual union all
  7             select null,'ikl' from dual union all
  8             select null,null from dual union all
  9             select 'abc','abc' from dual
 10            )
 11  select  col1,
 12          col2,
 13          nvl2(regexp_replace(col1,'^' || col2 || '$'),'false','true') sy,
 14          case when col1=col2 then 'true' else 'false' end arun_Centinul_hoek,
 15          DECODE(col1, col2, 'true', 'false') Himanshu
 16    from  t
 17  /

COL1 COL2 SY    ARUN_CENTINUL_HOEK HIMANSHU
---- ---- ----- ------------------ --------
abc  abc  true  true               true
cde  cde  true  true               true
efg  aba  false false              false
ghi  ikl  false false              false
ghi       false false              false
     ikl  true  false              false
          true  false              true
abc  abc  true  true               true

8 rows selected.

SQL>

    SY.

  • I want to compare two tables and out a boolean

    This should be simple.  I want to compare two tables (5 items) and return a single Boolean value (T/F), not an array of Boolean.

    Thank you

    Kevin

    Right click on the comparison, the comparison mode, select compare the aggregates.

  • Compare two tables, APEX

    Hello

    I am trying to compare two tables, but I want to display values that are the differnet from one to the other,
    both tables have the same columns and have the same PK.

    Thank you.

    Hello

    You probably need a report based on a query like this:

    SELECT
   d1.deptno,
   d1.dname,
   d2.dname,
   d1.loc,
   d2.loc
FROM
   dept1 d1
   INNER JOIN dept2 d2
   ON d1.deptno = d2.deptno
   AND (      d1.dname <> d2.dname
            OR d1.loc <> d2.loc
          )

    You can also consider using FULL JOIN where you have different values of primary key in both tables and you want to include in the report.

  • Compare two rows in the same table

    Hi all

    I need to compare two rows in the same table, I don't know hoe to do it in pl/sql. Please help me on this.

    example:

    price of ro TR
    xya0001 AMA.7 12
    xya0003 ama6 14
    xya0004 AMA.7 16

    in table b is a unique value for each line, I need to compare the price column and see if the first value is less than or greater than the following value and, if there is more to put the corresponding value of br to a variable, and if it is less, put the corresponding value of the br to another variable. I don't know a method to do this, as I'm new to pl/sql. Please help me in this 
    for data in(select tr,br,price, lag(price) over ( order by tr) newcol
from yourtable)
loop
if nvl(data.newcol,0) > data.price then
variable1:=data.br;
else
varable2:=data.br;
end if;
end loop;

  • BUG? Statement of BRIDGE to compare two tables

    Hello

    I tried to compare two tables different dbs and remembered a post on applications to Connectin Cross
    http://barrymcgillin.blogspot.com/2010/11/cross-connection-queries.html
    BRIDGE temparb AS "EB05 01"
(SELECT * FROM arb)
(SELECT * FROM temparb 
MINUS 
SELECT * FROM arb
)
UNION ALL
(SELECT * FROM arb
MINUS
SELECT * FROM temparb 
);
    I expect to get the differences between the ARB table in my current schema and the table alias temparb arb in the other db. Yet it seems that in this case only the table in my current schema is read.

    I materialize at the table BRIDGE with
    BRIDGE temparb AS "EB05 01"
(SELECT * FROM arb)
    and select the value that I know to be only in the remote schema
    SELECT id FROM temparb WHERE id = 2562;
SELECT id FROM arb WHERE id = 2562;
    Both times I get no results. I even tried to use aliases on the table, same result. Tested in EA3 3.0 and 3.1.

    Has anyone tried this before?

    Concerning
    Marcus

    Hi Marcus,

    Have you tried without the quotes around the name of connection?

    I have a named connection
    system_local
    which I run the following command

    drop table testbridge_remote;
    drop table testdbrige;
    create table testbridge (col1 int);
    insert into testbridge values (1);
    insert into testbridge values (2);
    insert into testbridge values (3);
    commit;

    I have a named connection
    Name of the connection with space
    I performed the following in the

    drop table testdbrige;
    create table testbridge (col1 int);
    insert into testbridge values (4);
    insert into testbridge values (5);
    insert into testbridge values (3);
    commit;

    Then I can execute the following statement in the connection of system_local/worksheet

    BRIDGE testbridge_remote as the name of connection with Space(select * from testbridge)
    + (SELECT * FROM testbridge_remote +)
    LESS
    SELECT * from testbridge
    +)+
    UNION ALL
    + (SELECT * FROM testbridge +)
    LESS
    SELECT * from testbridge_remote
    +);+

    It works well.
    Returns the rows in the remote table not in the local table and lines in the local table, not the remote table.

    Kind regards
    Dermot
    SQL development team.

  • Compare two Tables question

    Hello

    I need to compare two tables (T1, T2) and update existing records only in T2, but not in T1. So basically, the lines updated in T2:

    Select * from T2 where T2.id not in (select id from T1).

    What would be a good way to achieve this in ODI?

    I created an ODI interface with a join T2.id not in T1.ID, but it did not work "coz:" ORA-01427: einreihig subquery returns several lines "."

    Appreciate any input/access map.

    Thank you.

    Hi Michele...

    At first glance, there are at least 2 ways to do it:

    (1) put the steps in "(select id from T1)" (you can use an ODI API to get the schema dynamically) as an object filter to T2 (interface), use the incremental update IKM SQL and put "Insert" option on 'No'. " This will do a few updates.

    OR

    (2) in an interface set the T1 and T2 and left join (based on T2) load a temp table where all fields accept the value zero. Next to the columns to update (of course the T2), create an ID column (I named him as T1_Temp_ID) and map the Id of the T1 to it.
    Now just create new interface where the temperature is source and put a filter like "T1_Temp_ID is not null.

    The first option is less complex and can bring better performance.
    The second option gives a better follow-up of the use of the table and the columns, but can be less performatique.

    This help you?

  • compare two table with cluster inside

    Hello

    I want to compare two tables containing a cluster with several groups in it. When you use the equal the result is the same pattern as the cluster of entry. But I just need a true or false. It doesn't bother me that it changed on position 1 or any other position.

    Is there an elegant way to do it?

    Thanks for any help.

    Yves

    Right-click equality and change to compare aggregations. That, or add a table and later.

    /Y

  • Disqualification: Compare the value list in another Table

    I'm relatively new to the Disqualification.

    I use the 11.1.1.7 version.

    I have 2 tables Oracle.  Table1.FieldA does not have a foreign key constraint (but should be) at Table2.FieldB.

    I created a snapshot for Table1 that includes FieldA.

    I created another cliché to Table2 which includes FieldB.

    I am trying to compare the Table1.FieldA with Table2.FieldB value to make sure that there is.

    I can think of a few processors that I could, but they seem to compare a value with another value in the same snapshot (table).

    Any advice would be helpful.


    Thank you.

    Ray

    Hello

    Use the search check if you want to just check between the tables. According to the reference database, you need create a list of choices on the table (can be either staged as you, or just a list of external choice provided the lookup columns are indexed). Use Lookup and return if you want to import data in the other table in your process. You can control if you want a 1:1 or from a 1:M relationship, and if you go back several records, you can use split chronogram: table with all the paintings of entry to create an intermediate join process.

    Mike

  • Retrieve two values of column in a table

    Hi I want to retrieve two values of column in a table and store the values as a single column value in another table... How to do with it?

    Use in this way:
    Insert in tab2 (col1) select col1 | col2 from tab1;

  • By comparing the two huge table columns

    Hello

    I want to compare two tables each of RECON_APPEND_01 table contains 375 million and RECON_VS_24082011 450 million records.
    RECON_APPEND_01 is a normal table and RECON_VS_24082011 is range partitoned table.
    The two table has a primary key on the column Serial_number. (Oracle 11g R2)

    Requirment is to obtain the records in the RECON_APPEND_01 table that are not present in RECON_VS_24082011.
    I came across a few suggestions for using operator less. Here is the query and its plan to explain
    CREATE TABLE RECON_APPEND_01
PARALLEL 3
NOLOGGING
AS
( SELECT   SERIAL_NUMBER
FROM   RECON_APPEND_01
minus
select SERIAL_NUMBER from RECON_VS_24082011
)
    Explain the Plan:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                    | Name            | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | CREATE TABLE STATEMENT       |                 |   378M|  6451M|       |  1398K (43)|        |      |            |
|   1 |  PX COORDINATOR              |                 |       |       |       |            |        |      |            |
|   2 |   PX SEND QC (RANDOM)        | :TQ10002        |       |       |       |            |  Q1,02 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
|   3 |    LOAD AS SELECT            | RECON_APPEND_03 |       |       |       |            |  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
|   4 |     MINUS                    |                 |       |       |       |            |  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
|   5 |      SORT UNIQUE             |                 |   378M|  4336M|  7255M|   775K  (4)|  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
|   6 |       PX RECEIVE             |                 |   378M|  4336M|       |   114K  (3)|  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
|   7 |        PX SEND HASH          | :TQ10000        |   378M|  4336M|       |   114K  (3)|  Q1,00 | P->P | HASH       |
|   8 |         PX BLOCK ITERATOR    |                 |   378M|  4336M|       |   114K  (3)|  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|   9 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL   | RECON_APPEND_01 |   378M|  4336M|       |   114K  (3)|  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|  10 |      SORT UNIQUE             |                 |   184M|  2115M|  3539M|   538K  (3)|  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
|  11 |       PX RECEIVE             |                 |   184M|  2115M|       |   216K  (1)|  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
|  12 |        PX SEND HASH          | :TQ10001        |   184M|  2115M|       |   216K  (1)|  Q1,01 | P->P | HASH       |
|  13 |         PX BLOCK ITERATOR    |                 |   184M|  2115M|       |   216K  (1)|  Q1,01 | PCWC |            |
|  14 |          INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_C002617302  |   184M|  2115M|       |   216K  (1)|  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Another alternate query:
    CREATE TABLE recon_append_02
PARALLEL 3
NOLOGGING
AS
SELECT   *
FROM   RECON_APPEND_01 a
WHERE   NOT EXISTS (SELECT  'X'
FROM   RECON_VS_24082011 b
WHERE   b.SERIAL_NUMBER = a.SERIAL_NUMBER)
    Explain the Plan:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation              | Name            | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | CREATE TABLE STATEMENT |                 |   378M|    26G|   450K (10)|        |      |            |
|   1 |  PX COORDINATOR        |                 |       |       |            |        |      |            |
|   2 |   PX SEND QC (RANDOM)  | :TQ10000        |   378M|    26G|   153K (28)|  Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
|   3 |    LOAD AS SELECT      | RECON_APPEND_02 |       |       |            |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS ANTI  |                 |   378M|    26G|   153K (28)|  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   5 |      PX BLOCK ITERATOR |                 |       |       |            |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL| RECON_APPEND_01 |   378M|    22G|   116K  (5)|  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   7 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SYS_C002617302  |     1 |    12 |     0   (0)|  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Based on the plan I've run the second query, but it's taking a lot of time around 4 hours and still running.
    Please suggest.

    With respect,
    Adeline Faure

    Look carefully at the request of Tubby. Your problem in your test is with b.val = null. You can't compare anything on a null using normal operators.

    SQL> select * from target_tab;

       VAL
----------
         1
         2
         3
         4
         5
         6
         7
         8
         9
        10

SQL> select * from source_tab;

       VAL
----------
         6
         7
         8
         9
        10

SQL> select a.*
  2  from target_tab a, source_tab b
  3  where a.val = b.val(+) and
  4        b.val is null;

       VAL
----------
         5
         1
         4
         2
         3

    John

  • How to compare the value of two combo

    I have two Combo Box (cbFirst & cbSecond). I want to compare the value that has been selected by the user and according to the result, the output is displayed. In the two combo box, I have provided the value.

    Here is my code:

    var a: number;
    var b:Number;

    function First(evt:Event):void {}
    a = evt.target.value;
    trace (a);
    }
    cbFirst.addEventListener (Event.CHANGE, first);

    function Second(evt:Event):void {}
    b = evt.target.value;
    trace (b);
    }
    cbSecond.addEventListener (Event.CHANGE, second);

    If (a > b) {}

    trace ("more")

    on the other

    trace (b is higher);

    Trace the statement inside the functions work very well and the value correct a & b is printed. But the comparison in the if statement does not seem to work. Could you please help me.

    There is a typing error.  Fix it or delete it:

    var a: number;
    var b:Number;

    function First(evt:Event):void {}
    a = evt.target.value;

    trace (a);
    compareF();
    }
    cbFirst.addEventListener (Event.CHANGE, first);

    function Second(evt:Event):void {}
    b = evt.target.value;
    trace (b);

    compareF()
    }
    cbSecond.addEventListener (Event.CHANGE, second);

    function compareF() {}

    If (a > b) {}

    trace ("more")

    on the other

    trace (b is higher);

    }

  • Compare two table

    Hello

    can you please help me.

    How can I compare two table. following my code...

    var my_array:Array = Array (5,10,15,20,25,30)
    var new_array:Array = Array (7,8,9,10,11,12,13)
    for (var i: Number = 0; i < my_array.length; i ++) {}
    {if(my_array[i]==new_array[i])}
    trace (my_array [i])
    }
    }

    Thanks in advance,

    JaxNa

    Then, you're almost on correct... See the same code that I modified a little,

    var my_array:Array = Array (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30);
    var new_array:Array = Array (7, 10, 9, 10, 10, 30, 13);

    for (var i: Number = 0; i
    If (my_array [i] is {new_array [i]})
    trace ("' my Array'" + i + "("+my_array[i]+")"new_array' "+ i +"("+new_array[i]+") = Matching");
    } else {}
    trace ("' my Array'" + i + "("+my_array[i]+") 'new_array'" + i + "("+new_array[i]+") = is only not to");
    }
    }

    If this is not so, explain exactly what you want

  • The column that does not match when comparing two records

    Hi all

    We try to compare two tables and find the differences. So if two records (1 of each table) have same PK but not always matching because of some columns, then we would display this columnname. For example:

    Table 1

    PK Parent Child Property1 Property2
    1AA1P1PR1
    2BB1P2oraPR2
    3CC1P3SRP

    Table 2

    PK Parent Child Property1 Property2
    1AA1P1PR1
    2BB1P2PR2
    3CC1P3PR4

    In the above example when I compare 2 tables all matches except Property2 online n ° 3. Thus, we would like to get an output like:

    PK Column_Mismatch
    3Property2 (this must be the name of the column that does not match)

    Appreciate the help.

    Thank you

    Andy

    Hi, Andy.

    Andy1484 wrote:

    Hi all

    We try to compare two tables and find the differences. So if two records (1 of each table) have same PK but not always matching because of some columns, then we would display this columnname. For example:

    Table 1

    PK Parent Child Property1 Property2
    1 A A1 P1 PR1
    2 B B1 P2 oraPR2
    3 C C1 P3 PR3

    Table 2

    PK Parent Child Property1 Property2
    1 A A1 P1 PR1
    2 B B1 P2 PR2
    3 C C1 P3 PR4

    In the above example when I compare 2 tables all matches except Property2 online n ° 3. Thus, we would like to get an output like:

    PK Column_Mismatch
    3 Property2 (this must be the name of the column that does not match)

    Appreciate the help.

    Thank you

    Andy

    Why you don't want no matter what exit for pk = 2?  Property2 does not correspond either to pk.

    What happens if the 2 columns (or more) do not match?  The following query would produce a list delimited, such as ' parents; PROPERTY2 '.

    WITH got_mismatch AS

    (

    SELECT pk

    , CASE WHEN t1.parent <> t2.parent THEN '; PARENT' END

    || CASE WHEN t1.child <> t2.child THEN '; CHILD ' END

    || CASE WHEN t1.properry1 <> t2.property1 THEN '; PROPERTY1 ' END

    || CASE WHEN t1.properry2 <> t2.property2 THEN '; PROPERTY2 ' END

    AS the offset

    FROM table_1 t1

    JOIN table_2 t2 ON t2.pk = t1.pk

    )

    SELECT pk

    , SUBSTR (incompatibility, 3) AS column_mismatch

    OF got_mismatch

    WHERE mismatch IS NOT NULL

    ;

    If you would care to post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for your sample data, and then I could test this.

    The query above does not count NULL values as inadequate.  If you want that, the same basic approach will work, but you can use DECODE instead of <> to compare columns.

    What happens if a pk exist in a table, but not the other?  You want an outer join, where I used an inner join above.

Maybe you are looking for