Console access for the user?

What is the best way to give users access console on a virtual computer without having them download the client.

Hi RaymondG,

If you use no ESXi you can provide users the web URL of console to virtual machines.

If this isn't an option, you can use VNC or even try to start from a Windows device; MSTSC/console.

When the VIC / vSphere client or the web console is not an option, I generally lean towards VNC (personal preference).

-Eric

Tags: VMware

Similar Questions

Location of access for the user account

I have 3 cases where my account connects to vSphere. We have put an end to the session, but it returns. Is it possible to know where it came from to the source?
Thank you
Jeff

Hello.

You will need to use something like netstat or TCPView to see whence connections. You have monitoring tools that can connect to?

Good luck!

How to deny access to the user control panel?

A PC running under that Windows 7 is used by several users, I connect PC as an administrator and try to change the policy to prohibit access for the user in the control panel.

But I can't find a way to block certain users access to the control panel.

I don't know other users information to connect.

Is it possible to block some users access to the control panel at the same time of admin account?

Advice me please.

A PC running under that Windows 7 is used by several users, I connect PC as an administrator and try to change the policy to prohibit access for the user in the control panel.

But I can't find a way to block certain users access to the control panel.

I don't know other users information to connect.

Is it possible to block some users access to the control panel at the same time of admin account?

Advice me please.

You can use Group Policy prohibit access to the control panel...

http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/Windows_7-Security/Windows-7-options-for-standard-user-account/07c1084b-B65F-4b33-8579-1749ca661ded

its for all users this grouppolicy is enabled

Access policy for the user whose status is "disabled until the start date.
Hello

By default political access does not work for the user whose start date is later in OIM 11 g. I have an access policy that the provisions of all users of Xellerate OID. This policy is not work for users who start date is later, i.e. status = disabled until the start date.

No workaround to make the strategy work is much appreciated.

Thank you
GYAN
up to 10g it work very well if you put provisining date as the current date. But, you cannot apply even in oim 11g

Try below

Add new udf to the user profile
reconcile the start date in the new udf and leave the start of oim null date
In this case the access policy will be triggers and you will be able to get an account created to the OID, and then set the start workflow OID IOM

for reminder and all just to add trigger for the new udf and update on the changes.

Note: In your case as OID in disable State it will cause no problem after the user status "disable up to that Start Date. If the resource object in activate State and change you the status to disable up to that starting date, it does not fire disable the user trigger.

Kind regards
Mireille nayan

Can Oracle 10g - I use a variable for the access of the user identifywhat tablesto?
I have the following code in a trigger (PL/Sql block) of a form:

Select fieldname in user1.sometable myvar;

is it possible to use a variable instead of coding hard "user1"? And on the same subject, this variable would also be declared in the world?

Thanks in advance,
Darren
Hello!

User1 is the owner of the table sometable.

If only the User1 runs your form, there is no need to put the tableowner in front of the tablename parameter.

If other users run your form, you must create a public or private (for each user) synonym of this table.
After that, you don't need to use owner.tablename in your sql statement.

But:
You cannot use a variable for the user name without using dynamic sql
as you do if you create a recordgroup.

Concerning

Is there a way to give a user access to the users and computers active directory, without being an administrator

I want to be able to allow user group to be able to reset passwords and create accounts in an organizational unit. I delegate control of the organizational unit for the group, but if I connect to the domain controller and try opening users and computers active directory, we wonder an administrator password. I have a mix of two domain controllers Server 2003 and a Server 2008 DC. Is there a way to give a group access to the users and computers active directory without being administrator?

For assistance, please ask for help in the appropriate Microsoft TechNet Windows Server Forum.

Thank you.

No privileges for the user account

Hey there,

I have a strange problem and I'm not finding useful answers...

I installed Windows 7 Pro on a box that is used as a file server, database server and the virtual machine host.

Homegroup is disabled and password sharing is turned on. While I am trying to solve the problems, the firewall is disabled.

To manage permissions on the various actions, I created a few accounts: media, phone, remote_admin.

All three accounts have been removed from the 'Users' group so that they are not displayed on the logon page, and I used netplwiz to set my default account to connect automatically. Phone users and the media behave as expected, they have access to their respective shares, and the permissions are applied correctly. The problem happens with the user remote_admin.

The user is a member of the Administrators group, interactive logon is disabled, so it can be used only for the administration of the network. Even if the account is a member of the Administrators group, I can't be able to access network shares. I can connect to the network and list of the actions available on the box, but each of them is denied access. I created a sharing with access explicitly for the Administrators group and made sure the permissions of file system corresponding, but I am still unable to access any of the actions. I tried the same thing with explicit access to the account and got the same results.

Thinking it was a problem with the specific account, I deleted and recreated. Even without any modification of the authorisation, the account cannot access the network shares. After you re-create the account does not appear in managing accounts through Control Panel, but I'm able to see it in the accounts of users through computer management. In its default state, the account is allowed for a direct connection and can access the files on the disk, but cannot access the actions; during or remotely connected to the box.

Any thoughts?

* EDIT: I can not mark my own reply as an answer

All permissions to the shares are refused to the Administrators group by the UAC. Deny it does not take precedence over those that are permitted explicitly to the user or another group, there are a number of solutions:

(a) allow access to the user explicitly.

(b) add the users to another group (not integrated) and allow access to it.

(c) turn off UAC.

(d) modify the registry to disable the restrictions placed on the Administrators group:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionPoliciesSystem\\\.

Create or change the key called LocalAccountTokenFilterPolicy (DWORD32) and set its value to 1.

C and D above cause of the Administrators group to behave as it did in Windows XP. Access to shares default is restored (C$, D$ etc.). This also affects a number of other restrictions which have been implemented by the UAC as the driver installation and access to system folders.

The main difference between options C and D is C will remove all restrictions of UAC to the machine, while D will only remove the restrictions applied to network access.

More information can be found at (KB951016) Description of the control of user accounts and restrictions on distance in Windows Vista

Finally found the answer.

All permissions to the shares are refused to the Administrators group by the UAC. Deny it does not take precedence over those that are permitted explicitly to the user or another group, there are a number of solutions:

(a) allow access to the user explicitly.

(b) add the users to another group (not integrated) and allow access to it.

(c) turn off UAC.

(d) modify the registry to disable the restrictions placed on the Administrators group:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionPoliciesSystem\\\.

Create or change the key called LocalAccountTokenFilterPolicy (DWORD32) and set its value to 1.

C and D above cause of the Administrators group to behave as it did in Windows XP. Access to shares default is restored (C$, D$ etc.). This also affects a number of other restrictions which have been implemented by the UAC as the driver installation and access to system folders.

The main difference between options C and D is C will remove all restrictions of UAC to the machine, while D will only remove the restrictions applied to network access.

More information can be found at (KB951016) Description of the control of user accounts and restrictions on distance in Windows Vista

ACS 5.1 omitting the first attempt for the user

Hi all

I am facing a problem, a strange problem with the ACS. I use 802. 1 x on my network to authenticate users. I found that when I connect my network cable and put my authentication credentials will fail directly. I turn off my connection and will again and apply the same credentials, it works perfectly. I don't know why for the first attempt, it will fail the authentication and it will tell that (24217 host is not in the internal host identity store). You can see the table below showing the first attempt failed, but the second attempt successful for the user (testuser).

DEC 6, 10 PM 1:31:11.656

testuser

00-12-AE-7A-69-N6

Default network access

PEAP (EAP-MSCHAPv2)

Dot1x-3560-Switch

1.2.3.4

FastEthernet0/8

TESTACS

DEC 6, 10 PM 1:30:43.393

testuser

00-12-AE-7A-69-N6

Default network access

PEAP

Dot1x-3560-Switch

1.2.3.4

FastEthernet0/8

TESTACS

24217 l'hôte ne se trouve pas dans le magasin d'identités hôtes internes.

Please find the picture as an attachment to the (sequence of identity store)

Any help is appreciated

Thanks in advance,

Hello

in your sequence of identity store, I would suggest that you remove everything from the text box below, called "recovery of additional attributes.

Nicolas

===

Remember responses of the rate that you find useful

Impossible to retrieve the password for the user FUSION_APPS_WSM_APPID using ldapsearch

Dear all,

I'm unable to retrieve the password for the user FUSION_APPS_WSM_APPID using the ldapsearch command

Is the correct command extract the password for the user FUSION_APPS_WSM_APPID below?

$ORACLE_HOME/bin/ldapsearch - h < hostname > Pei 3060 d 'cn = sleep '' w < password > base b s 'orclCSFKey = basic.credentials, cn = oracle.wsm.security, cn = CredentialStore, cn is FusionDomain, cn = JPSContext, cn is FAPolicies' objectclass = * orclcsfname orclcsfpassword

Kindly help me in this problem.

Kind regards

Vinayak K

Can you clarify why you need recover the password? Application identities are designed for internal processing and never to be exposed outdoors or used for other purposes only lift access to the code in some scenarios within the system. So only the administrator must have access to the account and the password of access they would reset it in the store of credentials if necessary. That said I think that the admin can retrieve the password using the command listCred wlst something like:

listCred(map="oracle.wsm.security",key="FUSION_APPS_WSM_APPID-KEY")

Jani Rautiainen

Relationship with the developers of Applications in fusion

https://blogs.Oracle.com/fadevrel/

PRVF-4007: verification of equivalence for the user failed

Hello everyone,

I work a 2 node RAC installation, I installed CARS many times before, but I just ran the script with these settings

runcluvfy.sh stage pre - crsinst - n rac1, rac2-verbose

The last time I ran it I don't have these errors, but I think I used the user account name "oracle."

but this time I'm using another account of Linux, you have to use the name real = oracle for the account name?

The Linux account I use is not called "oracle".

This is the error I get when I run the script...

[oradest@rac1 grid] stage pre - crsinst - n rac1, rac2-verbose $./runcluvfy.sh

Conducting due diligence to install cluster services

Audit accessibility of node...

Check: Accessibility of node of the node "rac1.

Accessible destination node?

------------------------------------ ------------------------

rac2 yes

rac1 yes

Result: Check accessibility node from node "rac1.

Verify the equivalence of the user...

Check: Equivalence of the user for the user "oradest".

Comment by node name

------------------------------------ ------------------------

Rac2 failed

RAC1 failed

Result: PRVF-4007: user equivalence verification failed for user 'oradest '.

ERROR:

Not available on all specified nodes user equivalence

Verification can take place

Check prior to the installation of cluster service failed on all nodes.

Yes, you can use a separate account (e.g. "grid"). In fact, I always recommend a separate account, especially from 11 GR 2.

Must user equivalence be configured. It is documented in the installation guide. You can use the installer universal to facility user equivalence if you don't want to do it manually.

Hemant K Collette

PRVF-4007: failure of verification of equivalence for the user "grid."

All,

I have install the equivalence of SSH user between 2 node RAC (ushdc8498, ushdc8499) and able to ssh without password to other nodes.

The servers in the AIX operating system.

But still my runcluvfy.sh fails with the following message: -.

[grid ushdc8498] / u01/app/Oracle_Software/grid stage pre - crsinst - n ushdc8498, ushdc8499 #./runcluvfy.sh

Conducting due diligence to install cluster services

Audit accessibility of node...

Verification of accessibility node from node 'ushdc8498 '.

Verify the equivalence of the user...

PRVF-4007: failure of verification of equivalence for the user "grid."

The test failed on the nodes:

ushdc8498

CAUTION:

Equivalence of the user is not defined for nodes:

ushdc8498

Audit will proceed to nodes:

ushdc8499

Version of exectask could not be retrieved from the node 'ushdc8499 '.

ERROR:

Framework for installation verification failed on all nodes

Verification can take place

Check prior to the installation of cluster service failed on all nodes.

Thank you

Mahi

Thank you all, I'm able to resolve the problem.

It seems that the problem is with the software. I downloaded the new software fresh and re-directed runcluvfy.sh. This time, he threw the error/usr/bin/scp was not there, but it's there.

So, I deleted the file/usr/bin/scp of the two nodes and recreated link/opt/pware64/bin/scp/usr/bin/scp and rerun runcluvfy.sh.

Now he went well without any warnings.

Thank you for your support.

Thank you

Mahi

How to give read access to the users in IOM 10 g only

Hello
I created a new group readonlyaccess in IOM 10 g. I have given-menu item 'Element menu to manage users' group. Dmade a user member of this group. Now when I login with this user, I am able to see the users menu-search item, but when I search users, then no results of the search are displayed. I'm not able to figure out where I am doing wrong or what Miss me.

Please let me know if we can give only read access for end-users to IOM 10 g.

Thank you
Kalpana.

Refer to this:

{: identifier of the thread = 2148294}

-Marie

Download firefox 10, Setup asked for the user account, enter the type of w/admin myPC, firefox exit installtion (Toshiba A665/I7/windoe 7)

My computer is Toshiba A665 w/Intel core I7 and Windows 7 installed. When I run the installer of firefox 10, he asked for the user account ID and password. I entered the name of the computer that is mine with admin enter the account and a correct password. Installation of Firefox to quit smoking. No screen / another reply?

Hello

Please try a right click on the downloaded file and select run as administrator.

The last IOS 9.3.1 is now safe for the users of IPad 2 GSM? I don't want horrible IOS 9.3 activation problems recur everywhere.

The last IOS 9.3.1 is now safe for the users of IPad 2 (GSM) download and install? I don't want the horrible fiasco of activation IOS 9.3 reproduce anywhere!

Yes, you can upgrade to iOS 9.3.1.

Error number reserved for the user

Dear Sir

In my sweet, I use the cluster of error defined by LabVIEW

Y at - it a series of numbers reserved for the user.

Thank you

Massive

Help:

Error codes 5000 to 9999 and-8999-8000

http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361B-01/lvhowto/creating_user_defined_erro/

And als

500 000 to 599 999

http://forums.NI.com/NI/board/message?board.ID=170&message.ID=410869&query.ID=3477275#M410869

Felix

Console access for the user?

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for