Create 2010 compatible 2011 version of Labview VI

Similar Questions

• How can I create a new file interactively in LabVIEW 2011?

  I am trying to create a new binary file interactively in LabVIEW, but control of path only gives the opportunity to type the path name and the complete file (cumbersome for the user) or search for an existing file. I want to open a dialog box "New file", which will allow the user to navigate to the target folder, and then be able to enter the name of a nonexistent file to save the data of.

  The way I'm currently doing it is to create a TXT using Windows Explorer file "New text Document" pop up, then change the file extension for the new value... which is once again, very heavy.

  The only thing I've found online is that there used to be a "new File.VI" in an earlier version of LabVIEW apparently... but I can't seem to find it in 2011.

  You can create a new file using the Browse button.

  Your right click the file path control and check the settings in the menu "Options to browse?

• I just bought streets & trips 2010 (10/02/2011) and now there is a 2011 version. Is there time for a free upgrade?

  I just bought streets & trips 2010 (10/02/2011) and now there is a 2011 version.  Is there time for a free upgrade?

  As I understand it, there is no option available for the streets and trips 2011 upgrade.

  If you are interested in the 2011 version you can buy a new copy, which is now on sale, just for 24.95

  http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/pd/productID.225660300?WT.mc_id=pointitsem_US_Bing_5-Streets_generic&wt.term=streets%20and%20trips%202010&wt.campaign=5+-+Streets+%26+Trips&wt.content=bzmgML4T&wt.source=bing&wt.medium=cpc&WT.srch=1

• folder "is not compatible" with the photoshop cs6 version, but was created in the cs6 version!

  3 Photoshop PSD I created last week. Recorded 3 PSD in the same location on my computer and created in the same version. Today, I'm going to open all 3 and all but 1 opens. The 3rd file says "cannot complete request because the file is not compatible with this version of photoshop". I don't have a newer version, or I changed nothing. Anyone know how I can fix this problem?

  I was able to contact a technical support person and they tried to open the file in the newer version, however, they also said that the file is corrupted. Fortunately I sent me an e-mail that day from the PSD. I had to download from my e-mail address and opened it right. Not to self: save files in multiple locations, and sending the e-mail to yourself has been a lifesaver!

• PCI-4351 and what version of labview?

  I have a Board of 24-bit AI NI PCI 4351 that I am tring to use with Labview 2009 on Win XP with 7.44 DAQ. Whenever I have a vl of the 4351 on the block diagram, I get an error message indicating that this vi is old to be converted to this version of Labview.

  So I guess my question is, "what is the latest version of Labview to be compatible with the PCI4351 on Win XP and 7.44 DAQ card?"

  It is clear that these VI have been created in LabVIEW 5. In order to open this VI LabVIEW 2009 you will need to register in an intermediate version of LabVIEW (LabVIEW 6 or higher). You can check it out on the table in the link below.

  How to change to different version of LabVIEW VI: http://www.ni.com/tutorial/8387/en/

  There is a forum of OR which allows display of VI and other users to convert for you, see the link below.

  Conversion of the VI Version: http://forums.ni.com/t5/Version-Conversion/bd-p/VersionConversion

  -Will.i.am10

• Application of RT doesn't boot controls after upgrade from 2010 to 2011

  We have recently improved our system RT from 2010 to 2011.  The system is a NEITHER-8110 with two GigE cards, a card series and some Renault.  All the materials.

  When run directly from the project, the application works fine, but when it is built to run standalone it doesn't boot orders of the front panel and instead, we get past empty strings or zeros.  Sometimes the after a minor change (such as adding a debug string printing) it starts working independently, but the breaks on the next generation.

  It almost seems that we have a file used by Labview RT which was not managed correctly by the upgrade.  Someone else has met for this.

  Zach,

  Thanks for this tip.  We do not have the debug option checked, but it is possible that we have fallen into a bug in Labview 2011 (no SP1) due to the size of our application where the façade is not initialized.

  Based on your tip, I created constants and ones used to initialize the controls.  Change solved the problem, at some point, I change the controls to the indicators.

  Thanks for your help.

  N.

• form was created by an older version of the form builder

  I developed my form using Forms 10 g (9.0.4.0.19 (Production)) and when he kept on the application server.
  
  After that, I used my forms to uprgrade forms migration assistant... .the 932 kb resulting file converted to a 500 k file...
  
  I then used the compiler forms
  
  where in I specified the name of the fmb file... has given the username, the pwd and the string for the database...
  
  and I see even a compiled fmx copy into folder...
  
  but when I try to run on I get it
  
  form was created by an older version of the form builder
  
  I want that my forms are converted 10.1.2.0.2 production so that i can host the application on the server
  
  Published by: Chase Suhail on February 8, 2011 23:37

  Hello

  Sources (.fmb) must be built on computer target to generate a binary compatible (.fmx).

  François

• While the MBP for repair, I downloaded FCP 10.2.3 to a computer lent. Back on my own machine, FCPro borrowed machine library will not be opened because it was created with a newer version of the CPF App Store not 10.2.3 full download

  While my MacBook Pro for the repair, I downloaded FCPX to a computer lent 10.2.3. Back on my own machine, library of FCPX of the borrowed machine will not open because it was created with a newer version of FCPX. And the App Store won't let me finish a 10.2.3 download because the FCC is already on my computer - and he says that no update is available.

  FWIW - MBP 15 "beginning 2011, running OS 10.11.6 Beta (15G7b)

  Any ideas that can help me to keep the day of the Assembly, I did on the other machine?

  Move the application to the trash and try to download it from the shopping page.

• deployment error: unable to locate all the subVIs screws saved because a Subvi is missing or the VI is not registered in the last version of LabVIEW.

  Hello world

  I want to deploy my project Teststand and got a strange error when creating the image.

  For many additional files with the suffix as .tso, alias, lvlpb, exe, dll... deployment tool launches the error message "unable to locate all the subVIs screws saved because a Subvi is missing or the VI is not registered in the last version of LabVIEW.» (see also the attached picture).

  If I exclude the files of my distribution or set them to "include without treatment or dependencies of elements of" the generation works fine.

  After the error, I checked the Temp folder. The temporary project LV is not yet created.

  I used the deplyoment-installation in the same way within a fromer project and had no problems like that...

  I use Win7 / LV2013 SP1 & Teststand 2013 f1 (5.1.240).

  Could someone help or support? Thank you!

  Finally, I tried the construction with LV2015 & TS2014 - no problems... Everything works fine...

• Set the latest version of Labview

  Hello

  If a PC has 2 (development) versions of Labview installed, for example Labview 2010 and 2012 of Labview, how does Teststand know what Labview adapter to use?

  I am wanting to avoid the situation where a newspaper operator (Windows), should open close Labview 2012, then open the Teststand operator Interface.

  If not followed then the operator Interface opens Labview 2010, which is not wanted.

  Thank you I could remove the old version of Labview and that each operator only has to open/close once Labview 2012.

  Y at - it a setting of all user/audience in Win XP and 7 which can be modified?

  Kind regards

  Gary.

  Or you can deploy your automation, so it does not use the development environment and it will automatically detect the correct version of the LV RTE.

  If all of the development environment, TestStand will use the current version of LabVIEW.  I think this could enlighten us: http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Change-currently-active-LV-version-in-batch-script/m-p/2422750#M7474...

  Here is another link on all of this:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/A3F87B8347E41363862575DD00139245?OpenDocument

  Hope this helps,

• creation of software version track Labview so works after 30 days

  I created the program using version trail OR labview software and the hardware I use is material NI Compact RIO. I build and created EXE file in the material Compact RIO now its fine work if after 30 days trail version is more to know if it works without any problem, because the software I use is a trail version.

  Interesting question.  I used executables compiled wide enough and even if it's not a direct response to your question, while I start writing the program on my computer with a license full and later compile it on this one, I often installed a copy of the trial on the computer on which the executable would be possibly used with what I could change and test the code out without having to hike in both sense as well to troubleshoot my programs and never later, I had a problem, and several times the program last record on the trial version until I copied it on my PC with the license to do the actual compilation of it.  This says I imagine there is a way they could include the expiration in the executable.  Generally for all the demos, there is a help file or the readme that explains the exact limits of the demo version.  I wouldn't really recommend based on what it is because you will not be able to go back and fix or change it later without a full version.

• small runtime for more recent versions of labview?

  A few times in the past, I created simple LabVIEW autonomous executibles.  I did this in 8.6 and used minimum duration Engine Setup instead of the full version.  This resulted in a size of 30-35 Meg installation package.

  Agin need to create a simple executable, but have not seen a minimum setup for any version of LabVIEW 8.6

  Are there minimum runtimes for other versions?

  The runtime default 2014 is Meg 264!  It is difficult to explain to a client why a simple "Hello World" program requires a 200 Meg download.

  Jack Dunaway has documented a way to segment the execution engine, basically only, including parts which you need.

  https://connect.wirebirdlabs.com/knowledgebase/articles/172999-segmenting-the-run-time-engine

  And this is a point of exchange of idea about that.

  http://forums.NI.com/T5/LabVIEW-idea-exchange/segment-the-LabVIEW-run-time-engine-RTE-to-only-necess...

• "VI a error 1002288.The full version of LabVIEW Development is necessary to correct the errors."

  Hello

  I had created an executable in LabVIEW 8.6 on a PC windows XP 32-bit. The application uses some screws of Vision. The executable is running in most of the PC except one. the PC is a windows 7 64 bit. I first got the error "Labview support 3 error code: could not load front". "" I fixed this by changing the settings of the source file in the application builder. Now I get the error message "VI a error 1002288.The full version of LabVIEW Development is necessary to correct the errors"and the exe displays a run button broken.»

  But if I build the exe in the same PC I get no error and it works very well. Moreover, I tested this exe in another PC with the same configuration, it works. I tried to reinstall labview in the PC, the problem persists.

  Hi Nitrox,

  There is no official adapter for LabVIEW 8.6 in Windows 7. See link below.

  www.ni.com/LabVIEW/OS-support/

  Upgrade to SP1 LV2009 should solve your problem. We had this problem with another client and update SP1 LV2009 solved his problem and should solve your problem too. If you have a problem after the update let me know.

  Kind regards

  Christophe P

  Technical sales engineer

  National Instruments

• Version of VI is still too early to convert the last version of LabView

  I get this error when deploying a simple loop VI I try to troubleshoot the symptom of not being able to connect to the remote control.

  I have LabView 2014 SP1 version 14.0.1 installed and that's what I used to build the VI (see attachment).  The version of the software on the cDAQ 9139 I work with ranges from 14.0.1 for real-time 14.2.0 for DAQmx 14.5.0 or Web Application Server.  (See attachment).

  How can we still too early to convert to the current version, if the software LabView 2014 is installed on the cDAQ has VI created in LabView 2014?

  Again, the symptom that I see is "Server does not support remote façade panels" when you try to access the façade of a web browser.   I confirmed by working with our it Department IS not blocking all communication.  The Blue Coat standard software is not installed on the computer, I'm trying to access the Panel of (I also tried to connect to the remote control of my computer at home that has no software IS on it with the same results).  Anything related to the NC was added as exceptions to the firewall.  I have tried a large number of configurations of ports and worked through the troubleshooting list, you can find on NI.com when you search for this error.  There must be something tiny miss me.

  In addition, nobody knows what the two links in the HTML file that is generated when you use the Web publishing tool are supposed to do?  One is a FTP link and the other is a link to the plugins page.

  I took two step forward on this issue.  First of all, I reformatted the hard drive of the cDAQ and reinstalled only most of the software as before, I had been all install available on the host the cDAQ.  This seems to have fixed the error 'version of VI is too early to convert the last version of LabView.  Secondly, I discovered an error in my understanding of the port settings.

  In the configuration of the cDAQ web screen, the web application server is listed as port 8080, by default I believe.

  In the properties cDAQ in the Project Explorer window, the web server has been changed on port 80 to eliminate the need to put in the port number to access the remote control.

  I'm sure it's an assumption on my part, and oblivion, but I thought that those who have the same parameter with just the ability to be set from two different places.

  When I try to access the remote control via the web browser uses the web application server port listed in the views of web configuration, I received the error "server does not support the remote panels.  When I try to access the remote control via the web browser using the port listed in the properties of the CDAQ project for remote control Server Explorer, I could see and interact with the remote control.

  This probably also makes perfect sense now that I understand they serve two different goals, but if you define two ports at the same address, you will get the error "server does not support the remote panels.  Interesting that it always provides the correct html page.

  I am sure it was my problem throughout linked to the issue of the remote control.  I was probably just lucky when I put the Panel remote port server during the initial setup and my luck ran out when I upgraded to LabView 2014.

  Hope this helps people who may have the same assumptions I made.

• What version of labview is labview 2008

  Simple question

  What version of labview 2008 screw create? (8.6, 9.0, 8.5, etc..)

  and

  What is the max download on this site? (second time, I ask you, was all first unanswered)

  Hello

  Check this box