Daily series VS Performance and entertainment?

Similar Questions

• Problems of performance and more recent PPAPI Flash Player free?

  Hello

  I recently noticed some pretty serious performance issues in the latest versions of PPAPI Flash Player in Chrome.

  I use:

  • Windows 7 64 bit
  • Version of chrome 41.0.2272.101 m (64-bit)
  • Flash Player Version PPAPI: 17.0.0.134

  I noticed a sharp decline in performance recently when updating of Chrome, I've been using Away3D 4.1 (using Stage3D) to create a series of generative Art experiments, if you check out the one below that I found in Internet Explorer and Firefox (using the version of the Flash Player NPAPI), the performance of FPS on my system is about 35-40 fps for me , but in drive PPAPI of Chrome, it fell drastically to all about 6 or 7 fps.

  Recently I updated my version of Chrome, so this is a recent change... around a few weeks ago, that this content was working fine in Chrome, around 35-40 fps even I get in other browsers.

  http://Waroo.com/genart9s

  Did anyone else out there see these performance issues with recent versions of the Chrome PPAPI Flash Player?

  That's the good news, thank you for the update.  We work closely with the team of Chrome, and there were corrections of the performance of both sides.  I have to debug it to understand which give, but it is good to know that things are trending in the right direction.  We would certainly reach parity with NPAPI in terms of performance (he has often a trade-off between security and performance), and we will continue to target for earnings opportunities wherever they present themselves.

  Thank you!

• What is the best software to improve performance and free hard disk cleanup. I used MacKeeper, but I'm tired of paying annual fees for this service.

  What is the best software to improve performance and free hard drive cleanup? I used MacKeeper, but I'm tired of paying annual fees for this service.

  You shouldn't have these software.  See discussion of Klaus1

  Do not install MacKeeper

  See also this one by Klaus1

  Viruses, Trojans, Malware - and other aspects of Internet Security

• Daily Safari becomes more and more slow...

  Daily Safari gets slower and slower and finally crashes.  Use the activity mode CPU monitor, I discovered that the process of networking of Safari, using 200 to 300% of the processor.  I did a force quit and everything was going well for the rest of the day.  It is now a daily process.

  Any ideas on what's going on?

  Do you have the following items on your computer?

  • antivirus (AVG, Avira, Avast, ClamXav, ESET, Kaspersky, McAfee, Norton, Sophos, etc..)
  • 'maintenance' apps (AVG Cleaner, CCleaner, CleanMyMac, MacKeeper, Memory Cleaner, TuneMyMac, etc.)

• Profile of Performance and memory

  Hi, guys

  Trying to analysis the data of my profile to the profile of Performance and memory.

  When I check the data for VI times, I found there are same screws with different time of VI, whatever that means

  Why I cela it is because I will add model pulse for my VI, so I need to know the relationship between my all instruments and time, I'm on the right track

  Thank you

  It seems that the calendar had a resolution of 15.6 ms, which I think is common on some flavors of the Windows operating system.  Note that the average time on some of these screws is equal to zero.  This suggessts that time for many tracks 1878, was probably recorded as zero and some were 15.6 ms.

  It's one of the limitations of the Profiler.

  Lynn

• Slow Windows XP performance and video freeze

  original title: WINDOWS XP slow performance and video freeze

  Are there programs MS FIX - IT for WINDOWS XP fix the slow performance and video freezing?

  What is the best protection for malware, worms...

  Also, when I run that these free fix it offers, that really charge you, they detect the registry errors etc that is not the FIX - IT

  See establishing a fix for.

  Hi shawn thornton.

  ·         Since when are you facing this problem?

  ·         Videos freeze on the internet?

  Method 1: You can run the next Fixit and check if it helps.

  Difficulty of Windows system performance slow computer problems

  Method 2: Try to run an online scan and check if that helps.

  For Windows Vista and Windows 7 security scanning

  Malicious software removal tool | Protect your computer

  You can also download Microsoft Security Essentials.

  Method 3: Try to start in safe mode and check the number.

  Please respond with more information and results, so we can help you better.

• Monitor performance and reliability of Vista not updated

  Hi all

  I have a HP Pavilion dv4 Vista SP2 machine is installed. From time to time, I check the performance and reliability of my machine monitor. Recently I discovered that reliability monitor has not been updated since 17/03/2012, while performance monitor is OK. I've used various methods to overcome this problem to delete the contents of the folders PublishedData and stateData evolution of their access permissions. However, no method has been of assistance. I also tested my memory with the Memory Diagnostic tool, and if all goes well no error has been detected.
  When I check the Task Scheduler RacAgent.exe, everything is OK and its State is mentioned as queued. But when I run it, nothing happens and the last Run result shows 0 x 0. Also when I run the command line RacAgent.exe nothing happens. I should mention that a few days ago the RacAgent.exe worked normally and the task manager has also shown its process for about 30 seconds and the field last result run the task scheduler has shown other useful addresses, but even at that time there, I had the same problem: reliability monitor not updated.
  I really need your help and I look forward to your itinerary
  Best regards

  Hey Amir,

  Thanks for asking! Looks like there could be possibly a corruption of system files or an infection. We will check by running the associated scans.

  The auditor of file system (CFS) scanner to check any file system corruption. Follow the article here.

  In addition, run Microsoft Safety Scanner to check any infections. Read this article for the same thing.

  I hope this helps! Don't answer that if they do not help, we can seek other options.

• Information on the performance and tools: Visual effects adjust - adjust for a performance/appearance: influence on the photos and video?

  When I enter: Information on the performance and tools: Visual effects adjust - adjust for a performance/appearance, it affects pictures and video? What is the display of the video?

  I really like what I see with better appearance. But my laptop is slow a little, and I get this Green spinning circle and programs not opening.

  But since I intend to make some photos and video editing in the computer and watch a few videos, I wondered if the work will be compromised.

  I have a few tutorials to speed up my laptop, but can someone also suggest to speed up my laptop here? I'm always willing to learn some things.

  Hello

  You can optimize the performance of different options in the information on the performance and the tool window. This will not affect the performance of the images and videos. Adjust for best appearance to set the computer to enhance the appearance, it allows many features aero that improves the display quality of the computer.

  To optimize the performance of the computer follow the steps provided in the link below and check if that helps:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/optimize-Windows-Vista-for-better-performance

• 16 disks table PS5000 Sata - Raid for better performance and more capacity

  Good afternoon all

  I studied the whims of the various raid options and I was wondering if anyone has any practical idea using tables PS5000 SATA?  Basically, the table will backup disks to virtual machines as well as Raid would be preferable for the performance and capacity?  I was thinking 50 Raid or Raid 6, that the table is at a distance of my office in one data center so that there could be 2 failures before the disaster...

  Thank you very much

  Eric

  Hi Eric,.

  'best' depends entirely on the expected I/O model.  Small random writes should use R10.  RAID50 is usually a good compromise on space and performance.  But it has the risk of a double RAIDset faillée down.

  Another factor is that the PS5000 is end of life.  No support, firmware or parts of long term.  Help to off the shelf drives add uncertainty to the reliability of the table.   I would never use one of these for primary production so data.  To provide the best protection in this case, I would use only RAID6.   R10 would be down, but may suffer and failed with two failed disks in the mirror of the same value.

  Kind regards

  Don

• Windows task manager looks completely wrong-it has no tabs for applications, services, processes, performance and put in a network, just a box of size rectangle TASKS WORKING ON?

  The Windows Task Manager seems completely wrong - it has no tabs for applications, services, processes, performance and networking, just one size rectangle box SHOW the TASKS of WORKING ON?  I use it all the time close process and close programs stuborn. None of these options are CURRENTLY available? The only thing I can think is I went to delete one of my readers WD3.0 data and he says it has been used by another program and I've had that happen before and just go close a lot of the process by typing Control, Alt and delete which opens the windows task manager. I recently changed "System Configuration'under'msconfig" Normal startup to "selective startup" and reduce the number of drivers and programs loading to 'Start Up', as he ran 90 things and slow start. "" "» I have no viruses or malware. I changed the "system configuration" back to normal + restart and that he would remove the progams, or processes that have been intefering with the Western Digital HD software. THIS IS WHEN I FIRST NOTICED WINDOWS TASK MANAGER HAS BEEN SCREWED UP.

  But I can't because my Windows Task Manager is just a rectangular box with a single word to the top sayingTASKS!  Without tab with all the other options as in (program, process, services, performance, and network management).

  Would BE AN INTELLIGENT PERSON please TELL ME WHAT TO? I don't want to do a system restore , as I just cleaned it all points this week and just started around and added a bunch of programs and data this week that I let go.

  PLEASE HELP ME TECHE AND MICROSOFT. I PAY $250 p/year FOR THIS DELL ALIENWARE MACHINE LOADED due to it's PERFORMANCE AND THEY WILL NOT ANSWER (1) DANG SOFTWARE ISSUE WITH what THEY ARE PAID. THEY WANT $60 - $100 OR MORE TO ANSWER THIS QESTION FRENCH ANOTER. THEY USED TO, WHEN I COULD BUY GOLD SUPPORT BUT THEY SELL ON THIS MACHINE, SO I'M ON MY OWN AND THANKS FOR THE ADVICE LIKE THIS...

  The Microsoft Support web site.

  The task manager has two different views. For the display that includes menus and tabs, double-click the border of the Task Manager window. To return to the view without menus and tabs, double-click anywhere in the border around the tabs.

  We won't have the information mentioned in the first response of Sandsweep.

  (I confirmed Microsoft's answer worked.) I must have clicked on the edge of the window Task Manager to have switched over to the second, less familiar view.)

• Build self... Advanced performance and information system not showing the correct information?

  IV done a self build, and would like to know if this is a common thing or something I did in what regards why "information on the performance and tools" are not to enter the 'manufacturer, model. If I click Start and right click computer-> properties, then click on tools and information on the performance on the bottom left of the screen, and then click view and print detailed performance information and system
  What I get is,

  System

  System manufacturer (im asuming that I would see something like ASUSTeK Computer Inc.)

  Model product name system (im asuming that I would see something like M5A78L-M)

  In addition, the number of processors is showing 2... maybe this is a noob question, but I thought that 'quad' amounted to four?

  The MB is an Asus M5A78L - M USB3
  The AMD Bulldozer FX - 4170 Quad Core 4.20 GHz CPU
  16 GB of RAM
  Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6670

  I would add a scrrenshot, but I don't know how to upload it here, so hopfuly it's info is sufficient here to go. If not, please let me know what are the other necessary specifications

  Thank you

  If you really want your info system (manufacturer, model, OEM Logo, etc) there's this program that does this. It's a low)<500Kb) executable that you="" can="" download.="" it's="" called="" oem="" configurator="" 2.0.="" it="" lets="" you="" change="" the manufacturer,="" model,="" support="" hours,="" support="" phone,="" support="" website,="" oem="" logo,="" as="" well="" as="" the="" owner, organization,="" computer="" name,="" processor="" name,="" computer="" description,="" and="" the="" product="">

  You can download it here (Direct download link): OEM Configurator 2.0

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• Rewrite the query to improve the performance and the optimized below cost.

  Oracle 10g.

  ----------------------

  Query

  UPDATE FACETS_CUSTOM. MMR_DTL

  SET

  CAPITN_PRCS_IND = 2,

  FIL_RUN_DT = Current_fil_run_dt,

  ROW_UPDT_DT = dta_cltn_end_dttm

  WHERE CAPITN_PRCS_IND = 5

  AND HSPC_IND = 'Y '.

  AND EXISTS (SELECT 1

  OF FACETS_STAGE. CRME_FUND_DTL_STG STG_CRME

  WHERE STG_CRME. MBR_CK = MMR_DTL. MBRSHP_CK

  AND MMR_DTL. PMT_MSA_STRT_DT BETWEEN STG_CRME. ERN_FROM_DT AND STG_CRME. ERN_THRU_DT

  AND STG_CRME. FUND_ID IN ('AAB1', '1AA2', '1BA2', 'AAB2', '1AA3', '1BA3', ' 1 B 80 ', ' 1 HAS 80 '))

  AND EXISTS (SELECT 1

  OF FACETS_CUSTOM. FCTS_TMS_MBRID_XWLK XWLK

  WHERE XWLK. MBR_CK = MMR_DTL. MBRSHP_CK

  AND MMR_DTL. PMT_MSA_STRT_DT BETWEEN XWLK. HSPC_EVNT_EFF_DT AND XWLK. HSPC_EVNT_TERM_DT);

  Explain the plan of the query

  -----------------------------------------------

  Hash value of plan: 3109991485

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name                  | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT.                       |     1.   148. 12431 (2) | 00:02:30 |

  |   1.  UPDATE                       | MMR_DTL |       |       |            |          |

  |   2.   SEMI NESTED LOOPS.                       |     1.   148. 12431 (2) | 00:02:30 |

  |*  3 |    HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI |                       |    49.  5488. 12375 (2) | 00:02:29 |

  |   4.     TABLE ACCESS FULL | FCTS_TMS_MBRID_XWLK |  6494 | 64940 |    24 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL | MMR_DTL |   304K |    29 M | 12347 (2) | 00:02:29 |

  |*  6 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CRME_FUND_DTL_STG |     1.    36.     5 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  7 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN | IE1_CRME_FUND_DTL_STG |     8.       |     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  3 - access("XWLK".") MBR_CK "=" MMR_DTL. " ("' MBRSHP_CK")

  filter ("XWLK". "HSPC_EVNT_EFF_DT" < = INTERNAL_FUNCTION ("MMR_DTL". " PMT_MSA_STRT_DT') AND

  'XWLK '. "" HSPC_EVNT_TERM_DT "> = INTERNAL_FUNCTION ("MMR_DTL". "PMT_MSA_STRT_DT")) "

  5 - filter("CAPITN_PRCS_IND"=5 AND "HSPC_IND"='Y')

  6 filter (("STG_CRME". "FUND_ID" = "1 HAS 80 ' OR 'STG_CRME'." " FUND_ID "="1AA2"OR"

  'STG_CRME '. "FUND_ID"= '1AA3' OR 'STG_CRME'. "FUND_ID" = "1 B 80 ' OR 'STG_CRME'. '. "FUND_ID" = "1BA2" OR "

  'STG_CRME '. "FUND_ID"= "1BA3" OR "STG_CRME". "FUND_ID"= "AAB1" OR "STG_CRME". ("FUND_ID"="AAB2") AND

  'STG_CRME '. "" ERN_FROM_DT "< = INTERNAL_FUNCTION ("MMR_DTL". "PMT_MSA_STRT_DT") AND "

  'STG_CRME '. "" ERN_THRU_DT "> = INTERNAL_FUNCTION ("MMR_DTL". "PMT_MSA_STRT_DT")) "

  7 - access("STG_CRME".") MBR_CK "=" MMR_DTL. " ("' MBRSHP_CK")

  I could not optimize this query for best performance and optimized the cost... Can someone guide me on this.

  Thank you

  DS

  You think you're going to lines updates 85K, Oracle think it will update a line.

  At the time where the existence of the first test runs that oracle think already up to 49 lines, which is probably why he uses the loop join nested for the second test. (In your version of Oracle, the subquery introduced existence a very bad assumption (small) on the amount of data will survive).

  It is possible that you will get better performance if you hint Oracle using a hash join for testing the existence - and you might want to think what test will eliminate most of the data and that we can first force.

  Having said that, however, note that MMR_DTL research is a considerable fraction of the cost of the query - and an analysis is an easy thing for Oracle cost properly - if, despite your comments on update a column with a clue to this topic, you will find that the query can be more effective if you use an index. This is more likely to be the case if data ' WHERE CAPITN_PRCS_IND = 5 AND HSPC_IND = 'Y' "is well grouped (perhaps the latest data added to the table).". "  You could then reduce the cost of maintaining this index by creating an index based on a feature that indexes only the lines where the predicate are both true so that the 2 update deletes the index entries and allows the index remain as thin as possible.

  Concerning

  Jonathan Lewis

• How to suggest a new symbol of certification: (as OCP *), which includes certified more than professional oracle performance and tuning?

  Hello

  There are several versions Oracle has removed the requirement of performance and tuning in what concerns OCP.

  You can get a separate ECO - Oracle Certified Expert for the performance and tuning.

  However, databases there include performance and tuning in the basic DBA certification.

  I understand there is an OCP (for DBA) and a separate OCÉ (performance and tuning),

  but could it be considered as an additional symbol combining the OCP and OCE (such as OCP * or OCPE or OCP2).

  We could always get and OCP for DBA and a separate ECA for the performance and tuning.

  If there was an an additional symbol, then maybe selftest software would also create reviews of preparation for the performance and tuning.

  Perhaps more people write books on their performance and tuning of certification.

  Maybe Oracle would provide Web seminar Exam Prep for the performance and tuning.

  Thank you Roger

  
  

  If there was an an additional symbol, then maybe selftest software would also create reviews of preparation for the performance and tuning.

  Perhaps more people write books on their performance and tuning of certification.

  That hangs high hopes on a couple of letters.  The problem, however, is not perception, but the economy. Traditional publishers must sell a lot of books to make return on investment in the costs of creating a new. Until they beat X-thousand books, they are in the red. STS and transcend do not have publication costs, but they still have to pay someone (probably a very expensive one) to go through the mind-numbing task of creating a bunch of questions / answers that are enough like the real exam to be useful, but different enough to not be do not cheat. They should sell enough copies of the review of the practice of paying for that person, and then more overhead before making a profit.

  The main reason that I was able to create guides to study at the best prices is because they are printed on demand.  I don't have to recover the costs of printing a large number of copies in the hope they will sell. In addition, as I do all of the writing to editing to marketing of myself - it has no salaries to pay someone else. Despite this - I could easily do more initial money by running Oracle contract/work councils for the same number of hours that I put in my books and practice tests. I was called to joke with my wife I could do more by night shifts working underground, asking people if they want fries with that.

  The problem with an author or an editor of creating a book especially for an Oracle performance certification (say 1Z0-064 or 1Z0-117), is that there is so much work involved in this than the creation of a book of generic performance Oracle or Oracle SQL Tuning book, but the very act of this direct to the test severely limits the people who can buy it. Those who study for 1Z0 - 064 could well but a generic performance Oracle 12 c book.  However, people in the market for a book of performance 12 c but * not * intended to take certification 064 are not likely to buy this book even though she 1Z0 - 064 on the lid.

  There are not many hug of people with the knowledge and the ability to create these materials. This relatively small pool, it is there not much with the desire to do. This further reduced pool, there not much time for her - or at least of time they are willing to take more lucrative projects requiring their skills.

• Try to get your hands on my own pdf courses for performance and tuning 11g, oracle would have a list of the classes that I took?

  Tyring to find my own course pdf for oracle performance and tuning that I took through Oracle 11 g.

  I am student at 1z0 - 064 currently using 10g perf tuning book.

  Oracle would be the list of Oracle classes I've taken.

  If Yes, is it possible to get hold of the pdf from the class that I took?

  I realize that it is a stretch.

  Roger

  
  

  Roger,

  It is a question that you would need to contact the Support University Oracle- Oracle University Contact Information. They should be able to help you.

  Kind regards
  Brandye Barrington

  Oracle Certification program