DESLOADR.exe is not compatible for the Bernina embroidery software

Similar Questions

• Problems with sound and Audio - realtek hd audio is not compatible for the audio device

  I use Windows XPand receives my sound and audio to work, I got a lot of response to this problem, but not the right answers, I got my sound set correctly but my audio does not work. In my default audio device is defined as realtek hd audio that is not compatible for the audio device, I tried to remove it without any success because I don't know what else can be done to solve this problem. I did an update can also be found a update driver for my sound card in windows. I also run microsoft fixi it and said that my default audio device is wrong, I tried to change, but nothing seems to work. Before that my computer was working fine and now all of a sudden nothing works. Everthing is up-to-date on my computer except the I'm having problems. all I ask you, how can I removed realtek hd audio since I graduated from the audio device by default.

  Thanks for a quick reply.

  Hello

  You will remember to do recent changes to the computer before the show?

  I suggest you to download and install the latest driver audio realtek for Windows XP from the link and check if the problem occurs:

  http://www.Realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsCheck.aspx?langid=1&PNid=24&PFID=24&level=4&Conn=3&DownTypeID=3&GETDOWN=false

• Final cut 10 is not compatible for the TV station.

  I have change to TV with FCPX. I give a master (source-prores 422) to the producer. It encodes XDCAM HD422 (50mbps) and sends it to the encoding of the subtitles. He is then sent to the station. When it is released, there is intermittent "pops" in the sound and there are the occasional black frames. The sound is out of sync. The TV station said that they always have this problem with coins under the direction of FCPX. They say it's because of the way FCPX restores. They said there is a way to make use of compressor. Can someone tell me how to do this?

  "They say it's because of the way in which the FCPX renders

  They have no idea what they are talking about. If the project is successfully created there are zero export to ProRes format prolem. The application offers television sets. The process of subtitle is most likely guilty, unless the XDCAM is done on a PC with bead Mefdia Encider.

• After the installation of Windows Vista, I get this error: winload.exe tries to load a 64-bit application, but this processor is not compatible with the 64-bit mode.

  I recently installed Windows Vista on my Dell Inspiron 6000. This installation is completed successfully, but when I tried to start, I got an error message:

  Winload.exe

  Attempt to load a 64-bit application, however this CPU is not compatible with the 64-bit mode.

  I've been clean installation Windows Vista Home Premium. I already had Windows XP Media Center 2004. What should I do?

  Thank you

  Ryan

  Hello

  Do a clean install of XP with the XP disk provided by Dell, if you.

  http://pcsupport.about.com/od/OperatingSystems/SS/instxpclean1.htm

  If you do not have your XP disk, you can contact Dell and ask them to send you a XP disc.

  They should do this for a small fee.

  You need to change the Boot order to make the DVD/CD drive 1st in the order of startup and startup disk:

  How to change the Boot order in BIOS:

  http://pcsupport.about.com/od/fixtheproblem/SS/bootorderchange.htm

  "How to replace Microsoft software or hardware, order service packs and replace product manuals.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/326246

  Vista installation was able to destroy this option of relocation:

  And if you have never received a recovery disk when you bought your computer, there should be a recovery Partition on the hard drive to reinstall XP back on how you purchased your computer.

  The recovery process can be started by pressing a particular combination of the key or keys at startup. (Power on / start)

  A Dell must rely on Ctrl + F11 at STARTUP to reinstall XP

  See you soon.

• Why use my original USB cable charger for more than a year now is startig to show a sign that it is not compatible with the device? o

  I used without problem my USB cable for over a year, it is original Apple and yesterday began to show a sign that it is not compatible with the device. How can not be supported if it's Apple.

  This can occur if the cable is damaged in any way. See: recharge your iPhone, iPad and iPod touch - Apple Support for more information.

• Satellite U200: The file 'setupdiu.exe' is not marked for installation of BT

  When I tried to install the last stack of BT on my Satellite U200 installation stops with this message:
  The file 'setupdiu.exe' is not marked for installation.
  How to handle this problem?

  Hello

  you say the last won´t of BT-stack install? Which version is on your system installed? Sometimes an installation program needs a specific previous version to be able install
  the next higher version.
  So where you downloaded the package?

  Would be recognizing some comments, can we get a resolution.
  Welcome them

• Error 2753. The file 'Dist_acrotray.exe' is not marked for installation

  Hello

  I tried for days understand this problem with the Adobe Acrobat X Pro update. Whenever I try to update the software, via slot help, or click the icon to update in the system tray, then proceed to download the update, but get the error 2753. The file 'Dist_acrotray.exe' is not marked for installation.

  I tried to fix the software from the Control Panel, and I also reinstalled Acrobat as well. Help, please!

  Thank you

  Mike

  Specifications of the computer: Win7 Ultimate 64-bit

  Hi mobl11,

  You may wish to consult the Doc KB: http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/error-internal-error-2753-dist.html

• Firefox worked, today has not started with the error the version of this file is not compatible with the version of windows you are using.

  Computer is Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit. Firefox has work fine for over a year on this computer. Nothing has been changed or updated updated except Windows update indicates that it installed updates on August 19. I had computer week before because only out of town, back entrance and began August 18, but Firefox has worked that day. Does not use FF again until today. Today August 22, firefox does not start, shortcut icon changed program not there. Exe in the folder when you click Poster error message says the version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows, I am running. Exe of Firefox shows created on 20 August. I suspect the update, Windows or FF but lean towards windows, which was spent, who broke things. I noticed that IE 10 updates, updates of .NET framework and the malicious software removal tool have been installed. I tried to restart the computer, has not set. Tried to run as administrator, did not work. I don't want to uninstall FF, at least have to because of all the things I have here, bookmarks, last past passwords, etc..

  Hello

  Some Firefox problems can be solved by performing a clean reinstall. This means that you remove Firefox program files (not the profile folder, where the bookmarks are stored) and then reinstall Firefox. Please follow these steps:

  Note: You can print these steps or consult them in another browser.

  1. Download the latest version of Firefox from http://www.mozilla.org office and save the installer to your computer.
  2. Once the download is complete, close all Firefox Windows (click on quit in the file menu or Firefox).
  3. Remove the Firefox installation folder, which is located in one of these locations, by default:
     • Windows:
       • C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
       • C:\Program Files (x 86) \Mozilla Firefox
     • Mac: Delete Firefox in the Applications folder.
     • Linux: If you have installed Firefox with the distribution-based package manager, you must use the same way to uninstall: see Install Firefox on Linux. If you have downloaded and installed the binary package from the Firefox download page, simply remove the folder firefox in your home directory.
  4. Now, go ahead and reinstall Firefox:
     1. Double-click on the downloaded Setup file and go through the steps in the installation wizard.
     2. Once the wizard is completed, click to open Firefox directly after clicking the Finish button.

  Please report back to see if this helped you!

  Thank you.

• try to download the audio book gives the error "the version of this file is not compatible with the version of windows your race."

  frustrated, the overdrive software download player!

  I tried everything I can think of to download this audio book. whenever I try, I get a message error that says "the version of this file is not compatible with the version of windows your race. check the system and see if I need a 32 or 64-bit and contact the software publisher. "or something like that. I downloaded the overdrive media console software, but every time that I try to download an audiobook, it gives this message. I tried to change the settings with the "use an older program with this version of windows' software overdrive console in Control Panel with no luck. Anyone have any suggestions. I need help please!

  Hello

  always check the compatibility of vista programs on the link below

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/compatibility/Windows-Vista/default.aspx

  If a program is compatible with vista you can try right click on the setup.exe, and then selecting run as administrator

  It is not compatible with vista, you can try running it in a previous operating system mode

  This does not work for all programs

  read the information below

  http://www.howtogeek.com/HOWTO/Windows-Vista/using-Windows-Vista-compatibility-mode/

  ____________________________________________________________

  and read this information MS, too

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/start-the-program-compatibility-Wizard

• When trying to install Micro Cookbook 5.5 program get this message "this version is not compatible with the version of windows that you are running."

  Original title: MIcro Cookbook 5.5 install problems on Windows 7

  When I try to install a recipe program I get this message.  This version is not compatible with the version of windows that you are running.  Check the system information of computers to see if you need a x 86 (32 bit) or a or x 64 (64-bit) version of this software and then contact the editor.  I knew how to do this job of file transfer to the 32 bits of the 64 folder, but it won't let me install the program.  This software is no longer made.  The program is Micro Cookbook 5.5

  Do not transfer you files x 86 or x 64, that simply do not work and other issues.

  The program is designed for Windows 9, and if you have a version of win7 64 bit and the origonal is a 16-bit program, which she may very well, it will not install or run on 64-bit PC, so err msg you see.

  If the installation of the drive try this, locate the setup.exe, rt click & Select compatibility and select Windows 9 *.

• Win2K8 - this processor is not compatible with the 64-bit mode

  This is my first shot to create a virtual machine VMware

  We just got a new server in a data center

  Its windows 2008 Server. (the 64-bit version)

  My plan is to run a Server 2008 ontop of a host of Server 2008 virtual machine

  First I used a converter for P2V - this bit has been successful, so basically I took a picture of the host and converted to a Virtual Machine.

  I put the image to use 1 core of the dual core CPU and the memory (4gig) half and half of disk space on drive D (50 GB)

  Then I installed virtual server 2, and any

  Then I installed the thing that makes you see the window in Internet Explorer (some may be active x thing?)

  In any case, at the time of starting the server VM, I get the message:

  -

  ---

  Windows Boot Manager

  Windows could not start. A recent hardware or software change might be the cause. to solve the problem:

  1. Insert your windows installation disc, and then restart your computer

  2. choose your language settings

  3. click on repair your computer

  If you do not have the disk contact sys admin...

  file: \windows\system32\winload.exe

  status: 0xc000035a

  Info: attempt to load a 64-bit application, however this CPU is not compatible with the 64-bit mode.

  -

  ---

  I'm a little confused on this, the server is located in a datacenter somewhere and I don't think that the CD option is viable, because they will probably be responsible for a lot of things to do

  Any ideas what I should try?

  the cpu is 64-bit but because I split at the image, I'm not sure if that is break things

  Any advice appreciated

  Thank you

  You can run virtual servers, they simply can be 64-bit because your processor doesn't support VT

• Old favorites are not compatible with the version 20 + Firefox

  General information:
  I use the old client version 3.6 given that an old utility addon author stopped update and will not work with the new revisions. Despite disabling the update featured on: config and in preferences, the browser refreshes still finished (initially I was using 3.4 and would prefer to use that, but no matter how I try I can is no longer cancel 3.6 to 3.4 even if I reinstall using an Installer 3.4). Accordingly, I had the habit of keeping a copy of my directory of firefox where it updates again without asking, she has. This could help the guy out to meet countless people who have lost their favorites because of the upgrade released this year and I hope that someone to investigate and release a patch/utility to fix the problem.

  Question:
  I checked that the most recent customer since at least version 20 and leave, are not compatible with the old bookmark JSON files. Those who have been upgraded to the latest revision not only lose their favorites, but cannot restore them either, as Firefox only returns the error message: "unable to process the Backup File.

  I confirmed that the files themselves are perfectly intact with no sign of corruption and are as expected. Restore ok old revisions of browser (in my case specifically 3.6), they will not restore the most recent customer reviews. This isn't a fault with bookmark backups, but with new clients (I guess they changed the way they store information in the JSONs at some point. I note in the code for the JSONs GUID has never been used in old revisions, but it is in the most recent revision. Maybe it's causing an incompatibility problem? You just need to adjust the client so that it looks for the GUID and if none can be found to ignore it rather than decide that the file is corrupted.

  Old JSON Code snippet: {"title":"","id":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1306670152435000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","id":2,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1381254048121000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","id":6,"parent":2,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"mimeType":null,"type":3,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&sort=12&excludeQueries=1&excludeItemIfParentHasAnnotation=livemark%2FfeedURI& maxResults = 10 & queryType = 1 "}, {'index': 1,"title":"Recent Tags", 'id': 7, 'parent': 2,"annos": [{'name':" places/SmartBookmark', 'flags': 0, 'expires': 4, 'mimeType': null, 'type': 3, 'value': 'RecentTags'}], 'type': ' text/x-moz-place', 'uri' ":" place: sort = 14 & type = 6 & maxResults = 10 & queryType = 1 ""}, {'index': 2, 'title': id '',' ': 8, 'parent': 2, 'dateAdded': 1294868015246000, 'lastModified': 1294868015246000, 'type': "text/x-moz-place-separator"}

  New JSON Code Snippet: {"title":"","guid":"5rkFafJ6AnRZ","id":1,"index":0,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387525168000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","guid":"m7vLM41-lzQi","id":2,"index":0,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387526173000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","guid":"BEffyw6xva93","id":13,"index":0,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4 ,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&queryType=1&sort=12&maxResults=10&excludeQueries=1"},{"title":"Recent Tags","guid":"WmnlbVv38Bjv","id":14,"index":1,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"value":"RecentTags"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:type=6&sort=14&maxResults=10"}

  Solution?
  In my case, I had a copy backup of the old directory for review. To restore I opened the copy and export bookmarks as an HTML, that I restored in the most recent client. If you don't have a copy of the former client, the best thing would be to try and re-install an older revision of the customer and either make a copy of the program folder and use another copy of that you can use the new and old customers and you worry about the loss of an older revision, since you'll always have 2 copies of the former client (the one you use the one that you use to restore in the case of at level). Or export bookmarks to an HTML element, and then upgrade the client to the newest and import the HTML instead of JSON files.

  Please review and create a more simple solution to a problem of stupid incompatibility. ^_^

  There are a number of operations in the file places.sqlite which are obsolete.
  For example,.

  setItemGUID (aItemId, aGUID) obsolete since Gecko 14.0 - returns a unique global identifier for the element. This is mainly for use by extensions that synchronize data between different profiles bookmark.
  
  
  
  Former id snippit:
  "title": "','id': 1,"dateAdded": 1306666129870000,"
  New snippit
  {"title": "","guid": "5rkFafJ6AnRZ",""id ": 1, 'index': 0, 'dateAdded': 1396387525168000"}

  There are other identifier here has changed, I think in version 14
  «Note: the importHTMLFromFileToFolder() method has been removed in Gecko 14.0 (14.0 Firefox / Thunderbird 14.0 / SeaMonkey 2.11).»

  But more likely the former is Netscape format: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libra.../aa753582%28VS.85%29.aspx

  I tried this however: I installed the old version (3.5) and updated to the current version. All my favorites were there. I had to check the updates and could not skip certain steps of 3.5 to 3.6 for example. He then went from 3.6 to 12, then with todays update went straight to 30. They're all here. However nothing is perfect, backup is recommended as well.

  Back to your question, makes it easier for backward compatibility, my hypothesis is that they changed with the updates and ignored some versions. Saved profiles or places.sqlite files may be missing this change because the format changes in the update?

  My suggestion would be filing a bug at this request, providing a few cases where this would be necessary. Currently only the current version of Firefox is supported, which can leave us to the work around that you are currently using.

  Reference documentation for the developer of the places :

• Not compatible with the version26.* Add-on

  LightBeam add-on not compatible with the latest version of android firefox. What should do?

  Hello BudIsland, add-on (currently?) is available for firefox on desktop, not the android version: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/lightbeam/

• 16.0.2 Firefox is not compatible with the zone alarm Forcefield AGAIN. Please, help users with that. No current positions

  Before I updated to the current version, I checked for "reserves" and found nothing to indicate that the Zone Alarm Extreme Security, ForceField was not compatible with the Version 16.0.2. If I had known that I would not have updated. Y at - it no use for those of us who have this problem. ? The only post I noticed on this problem is 'closed' and dated about 8 months ago.

  Thanks for the reply, the old Fox!

  I agree with you 100%. This occurred without fault to each new update of Firefox.

  I wish that Firefox had warned users of the incompatibility issues with ZA ForceField, as they have done with other problems before users downloading the latest version of Firefox.

  Thank you also for the link to the "release notes", which I didn't have before. It is a help in the future.

  Warm greetings,

      Boudica
  

• I have Webroot Security and Firefox is not compatible with the malicious URL part of the program? How can I protect myself?

  When I downloaded Firefox and checked my extensions, I've been informed that Firefox is not compatible with the prevention of malware from my Webroot security package. I use it successfully with Windows and just renewed for another year. What do you do to protect myself? I'm not a computer expert, so if you can answer in plain language that would be appreciated. In addition, we stream video much and I noticed that DivX is also not compatible. What should I do about it? Thank you.

  Firefox has had its own fake Web / since 2008 malware protection.
  
  http://www.Mozilla.com/en-us/Firefox/phishing-protection/

  Firefox Add-ons developers are responsible for these add-ons up to date as new versions of Firefox are available. Check with Webroot & DivX on updates for their Firefox extensions.

  That said, the modules that are hosted on the official website of the AddonsMozilla.Org are tested and 'hit' by compatibility automatically, if these modules are considered to be compatible with a new version of Firefox that is about to be released. For modules that are not "compatible", the developer of the add-on Gets an email telling them basically what needs to be fixed. AMO extensions hosted are automatically updated as required by Firefox. The 'check' available updates each time is that Firefox is open.

  For modules that are not hosted on AMO, there is a 'updateURL' function that allows to have Firefox check for an update across the internet, the a particular extension developer said. Unfortunately, too many developers take advantage of this feature and needlessly let their users to search an update themselves. who then need to manually install the hotfix or update version.

  It's like a bunch of clowns of circus without master ring to 'bring in the clowns' at the right time in the show.