Difference between IPSec over TCP and UDP IPsecover

Similar Questions

• IPSec over TCP on PIX 501F to the catalog

  Hello

  Is there a way I can configure IPSec over TCP as default configuration in the PIX firewall. I'm under 6.3

  The PIX does not support IPsec over TCP. It doesn't support NAT - T, which is IPSec over UDP/4500, which houses also of the Cisco VPN client. Just add the following command on the PIX:

  ISAKMP nat-traversal

  The PIX and VPN client auto-négociera if necessary IPSec encapsulation. See http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/gl.htm#wp1027312 for more details.

• Client VPN with tunneling IPSEC over TCP transport does not

  Hello world

  Client VPN works well with tunneling IPSEC over UDP transport.

  I test to see if it works when I chose the VPN client with ipsec over tcp.

  Under the group policy, I disabled the IPSEC over UDP and home port 10000

  But the VPN connection has failed.

  What should I do to work VPN using IPSEC over TCP

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  Mahesh,

  You must use "ikev1 crypto ipsec-over-tcp port 10000.

  As crypto isakmp ipsec-over-tcp work on image below 8.3

  HTH

• IPSec over TCP works on VPN 3030 interface (3) external?

  I configured the third external interface and can connect with the ESP and UDP tunnel, but not with IPsec over TCP.

  The customer says:

  Unexpected TCP control packet received a.b.c.d, src port 10000, port dst 4408, flags 14: 00

  the hub said nothing, although I tried several event classes

  the document said "IPSec over TCP works with the VPN client software and hardware VPN 3002 client. It only works on the public interface. It is a client to the function of hub only. It does not work for LAN-to-LAN connections. "

  This means - it works on the public interface real, physical?

  or it should work on the external interface if I click on the checkbox to its public interface?

  Thanks for any advice,

  Martin

  IPSec over TCP is designed to operate only on the real public interface #2.

  There were a few technical reasons behind it, among them:

  (1) some clients cancel their tunnels on the private interface (one-arm-config) and that would cause a headache when trying to HTTP through the VPN 3000 if IPSec/TCP has been installed for Port 80/443. We decided to pull out of the private Interface.

  (2) that the external interface #3, we have chosen not to enable IPSec/over TCP Dynamics fielterso n it mainly because of the load balancing.

  Since the LB only works on real public interface #2, even once, we chose to leave

  IPSec/TCP out of it.

  Nelson

• IPSec Over TCP

  When you set this option on the SAA, that affect all VPN? It is an element of configuration global, if I work with UDP VPN, but I am to set up a VPN using TCP, the other VPN still use UDP, or that they do not fail as the other end isn't the same configuration?

  IPSec over TCP is supported only for the connection to access remote vpn client for the SAA. It is not supported for VPN LAN-to-LAN tunnel.

  And Yes, it will affect all the client connection to access remote vpn for the SAA once you activate it in the world.

  Here is the document for your reference:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa83/configuration/guide/IKE.html#wp1059912

• IPSec over TCP on Pix

  Nice day

  I would like to know if there is the possibility of configuring IPSEC over TCP on the pix Firewall.

  This features are supported by the latest Pix OS (6.3.3)?

  Thank you

  Diego

  The pix does not support ipsec over tcp. It supports NAT Traversal that is ipsec over udp. IPSEC over tcp is compatible with the VPN concentrator. The next link talks about NAT traversal.

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_sw/v_63/config/ipsecint.htm#1057446

  Take a look at this link to configure IPSec over TCP on a VPN 3000 Concentrator

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00800946bc.shtml

• VPN IPsec over TCP on PIX 6.3

  Hi all:

  Does anyone know how config IPsec over TCP on PIX6.3?

  Thank you all...

  Ted Wen.

  Hello

  You can enable IPSec over TCP to PIX Security Appliance Software Version 7.0 with the command "isakmp ipsec-over-tcp port. But I can't make it work and have posted my problem on the Forums of Discussion.

  Thank you.

  B.Rgds,

  Lim TS

• Difference between Esx v 2 and 3 and ESX 2.5 and 3.5

  Hello

  I want to know the differences between ESX V.2 and 3 and ESX 2.5 and 3.5. can someone help me on respect.

  Karthik.

  Hello

  The biggest difference between ESX 2.x and 3.x is how the virtualization of the boots as well as configurations of network virtual host.

  In ESX 2.x booted Linux then VMware took control.

  In ESX 3.x VMware started then place the unit of management within a virtual machine started.

  ESXi boots the vmkernel then starts a Posix environment in the vmkernel.

  The book of VMware ESX Server in the enterprise passes over these differences in a bit of detail, if you are interested.

  Best regards

  Edward L. Haletky VMware communities user moderator, VMware vExpert 2009, url = http://www.virtualizationpractice.comvirtualization practical analyst [url]
  "Now available: url = http://www.astroarch.com/wiki/index.php/VMware_Virtual_Infrastructure_Security' VMware vSphere (TM) and Virtual Infrastructure Security: securing the virtual environment ' [url]
  Also available url = http://www.astroarch.com/wiki/index.php/VMWare_ESX_Server_in_the_Enterprise"VMWare ESX Server in the enterprise" [url]
  [url =http://www.astroarch.com/wiki/index.php/Blog_Roll] SearchVMware Pro [url] | URL = http://www.astroarch.com/blog Blue Gears [url] | URL = http://www.astroarch.com/wiki/index.php/Top_Virtualization_Security_Links Top security virtualization [url] links | URL = http://www.astroarch.com/wiki/index.php/Virtualization_Security_Round_Table_Podcast Virtualization Security Table round Podcast [url]

• Difference between srvctl relocate scan and scan_listener?

  Hi all
  
  I have a 2-node RAC cluster using 11.2.0.2 grid Infrastructure.
  
  I'm trying to get well clear in my mind what the difference is between moving SCANNING using srvctl relocate scan and SCAN_LISTENER use srvctl move scan_listener
  
  Can anyone provide me explain when you would use each order and the effect there?
  
  Thank you very much.

  Hello

  See here for a closer explanation of the SCAN:

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/database/clustering/overview/scan-129069.PDF

  Regarding your questions: the difference between a SCAN VIP and VIP normal CARS, is that a node has the VIP CARS he wants to run on and each has one node (so that you have only 3 SCANs). If it fails over to another node, the normal VIP exists, but does not accept connections, while the SCAN is not set on a node and can run on any node in the cluster (and will accept connections at any time).

  Now it works, VIP SCAN to the SCAN listener (otherwise it would not make sense). This is why there is really no difference in moving the SCAN VIP (because this will trigger a move of the listener), or to pass the SCAN_Listener (since this will move the VIP depends).

  Concerning
  Sebastian

• What is the difference between the Service Station and Tempro?

  Searched for information on this, but have not been able to find:

  What is the difference between the Service Station and Tempro?

  I just run the wizard upgrade Toshiba and it installed the gas station but Tempro is already installed and seems to do the same.

  Concerning

  Bushy

  Hello

  These two tools are Toshiba one informs you of the new driver updates available on the Toshiba driver page.

  AFAIK Tempro is slightly older than the gas station.
  In addition the gas station seems to provide a bit more options and features like tool Tempro.
  However, I recommend using one my favorite utility's Service Station

• What is the difference between Ubuntu desktop edition and server edition?

  What is the difference between ubuntu desktop edition and server edition?

  Desktop Gets the window manager and terminal server :)

• Difference between Satellite Pro L300 and Pro A300

  Can someone please tell me the difference between Pro A300-21F and Pro L300-1RS as specifications on Tosh pages seem to be identical.

  Like us all, I'm looking for the more powerful machine at the lowest cost. TKS

  _Satellite pro A300-21F: _
  -Intel (r) Pentium (r) Dual Core processor T3400
  -SATA 160 GB (5400 RPM)
  -Chip graphics Mobile INTEL GL40
  -2 GB DDR2 (800 MHZ)
  -No Bluetooth
  -No fingerprint sensor

  _Satellite pro L300-1RS_
  -Intel (r) Pentium (r) Dual Core T3200 or Intel (r) Pentium (r) Dual Core processor T3400
  -SATA 160 GB (5400 RPM)
  -Chip graphics Mobile INTEL GL40
  -No Bluetooth
  -No fingerprint sensor
  -TV out (composite) or RGB external monitor available routes

  You are right, the two models of notebooks seems to be very similar and supports virtually the same devices.

  Good bye

• Re: Difference between Satellite L750-10F and Satellite L750-12 q

  What is the difference between the L750-10F and L750-12 q.

  Thank you.

  L750-12 q a 500 GB HDD and L750-10F has 750 GB of HARD drive.
  L750-12 q has USB 3.0 and USB 2.0 L750-10F.
  L750-12 q has REALTEK 802.11 (B/G/N) 13CH-RTL8188CE MOW - HMC and L750-10F has ATHEROS 802.11(B/G/N) V3.0 WB195-HMC w / BT + HS inside.
  L750-12 q is available in Poland and L750-10F in Germany.

  I found these differences. I hope I could help a little.

  Good bye

• What is the difference between the HX - 90v and HX - 80 coming cameras?

  What is the difference between the HX - 90v and HX - 80 coming cameras?

  Thank you!

  I'd say it's supposed to be a fill, a little brother to the HX90v

  It removes the control ring and the GPS, and I think the rest is the same.

  It is for those who want the HX90v but the price is a bit steep for the compact range, and they need not necessarily GPS or the ring of command, just a camera that works.
  This kind of thing, at least to my knowledge.

• Difference between the cDAQ-9174 and cDAQ-9178

  I have several cRIO-9081.  Each cRIO-9081 running NOR-DAQmx 15.5.  On four of the cRIO-9018 we show you cDAQ - 9178 with 8 modules.  Everything just worked.  On the fifth cRIO-9018, we tried to connect a cDAQ-9174.  The aircraft appeared in the Windows Device Manager and MAX, but MAX has indicated that the aircraft was missing (error-88705) and that Windows can't find a driver for the instrument.

  We then plugged a cDAQ-9178 in the fifth cRIO and everything just worked.

  What is the difference between a cDAQ-9174 and cDAQ-9178 other than the number of the module support?

  Paul

  Hi Paul,.

  It seems it could be a driver problem! What DAQmx version you have installed on two computers? Reinstall the latest version may be worth it because it looks like there may be corruption. You can find the latest version here: http://www.ni.com/download/ni-daqmx-15.5/5901/en/

  You can manually associate the device driver, here: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/5B80CAAA64413B4C86256C5E0000C1A7

  There are modules connected to the cDAQ chassis?

  Also, sometimes, this can happen if you do not restart your computer after the installation of the NOR-DAQmx driver. Restart your computer after the driver installation will allow you to reserve the device successfully. Here are a few others not to try:

  • Check the charger to device OR to see if it is running
  
  
  • Reset the service OR charger
  
  
  • Reset the MAX Configuration database
  
  
  • The system power cycle