DRM field validations

Similar Questions

• SelectOneChoice required field validation problem

  Got a query on the selectonechoice required field validation

  Below is the code works well, I generate the list of static elements (VO)

  < af:selectOneChoice value = "#{bindings." Division.inputValue}.

  label = "Division" styleClass = "Division".

  required = "true" autoSubmit = 'true '.

  shortDesc = "#{bindings." Division1.hints.ToolTip}.

  ID = "soc1" >

  < af:forEach elements = "#{bindings." Var Division1.Items}"="row">

  "< f: selectItem itemLabel =" #{row.label} "ItemValueOptional =" #{row.label} ".

  ID = "si21x1x25" / >

  < / af:forEach >

  < / af:selectOneChoice >

  The question is how to add "- Select -" in the above code and default value "- Select -" selected must, if the value is "- Select -", he must request the validation

  I want to be the label = "- Select -" to be selected by default

• Field validation extension background in Dreamweaver CS5?

  I'm doing a background inside a form field validation when you use Dreamweaver CS5. It is not strong enough to conduct "internal". I remember a validation named "Yaromat" behavior which is downloadable as one. MXP and installed using the extensions Manager and accessible via - maybe - one of the Group of experts ' + '.

  I'm looking around only to find available Yaromat behavior in the. ZXP and only for Creative Cloud Dreamweaver format.

  Am I right in my memories and, if yes, anyone know where I can find it?

  Thank you!

  The Yaromat validator was created by Jaro von Flocken. It is out of date and is no longer available.

• Field validation tab still enter data using regExp?

  Hello

  I use jdev 11.1.2.3

  I have a requirement on the field validation tab...

  I have a form that is not duplicate value accept value already existed DB table means so when back of the same value and tab on this high area error message (the code is already exist)

  How to achieve this can someone help me with the code...

  Thank you.

  The solution is given in my other post. Implement a valueChangeListener in your beans. In the listener method call an application module method that checks the new value that you get from the event. If the new value is already in the DB add a message of faces in the listener for changes in value and set the new value to the old value to avoid the false value is found in the user interface.

  Timo

• The 2 field in the conditional form field validation

  I searched on this forum, but didn't come with anything. I need to package the field validation in a table on the value of another field in the form of tables. How do I refer to a field in the form of table in the Condition section?
  
  I like to use (in my example SPECIES are the domain I want as my conditional validation on):
  
  Condition type: PL/SQL
  Expression 1: SPECIES! = "NFSH.
  
  So I need to know how to run the SPECIES matter in my tabular form in my conditional statement.
  
  Thank you!
  John

  What version are you on? 4.1 you can create validations of columns as a table and reference columns by using bind variables syntax, such as ": SPECIES.

• We can do a field cannot be changed using the field Validation?

  Hello
  
  Is it possible if we could do a non editable field using the field validation? We cannot do it in read-only because we have a code that uses the selector report to update these fields. Is there a way we can put a posting on the ground that it would throw an error message when a user tries to change this field?
  
  Thank you
  
  MB

  Of course, we can use the validation for this:

  Add this to the field Validation:

  PRE ('') = IfNull (FieldValue (''), "XXX")

  Replace FieldName with the actual field name.

  Good luck
  Royston

• Field validation for the number of characters and integers for NRIC

  Hi all
  I have a requirement for field validation NRIC number, I put the validation in the field as first digit is followed by a character of 7 integer digits and last digit as the character. The format is S7975363G. The user is not leave the key in full for 1 and the last digit. Please let know us if this is possible.
  Thanks in advance.

  Try the following domain validation:

  Len ([]) = 9 AND FindOneOf (Mid ([], 1, 1), 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ') + FindOneOf (Mid ([], 9, 1), 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ') = 2 AND Len (1 * Mid ([], 2.7)) = Len (Mid ([], 2.7))

  Replace the NRIC wearing the correct domain name

• PDF - 2 criteria form field validation?

  Is anyone know how can I get a pdf digital to be validated in a range but also form field to validate that the value is equal to or less than the value of another digital field?

  Thank you!

  I think the following custom validation script will do what you want:

  function range_validate1() {}

  Do nothing if the field is empty

  If (! event.value) {}

  return;

  }

  Initialize variables

  var sError = "";

  nMin var = 0;

  var nMax2 = 26;

  var = nVal + event.value;  User entered, converted to a number value

  Get the field value, converted to a number

  var nMax1 = + getField("Text1").value;

  If the value is less than the minimum

  If (nVal< nmin)="">

  sError = "Please enter a value greater or equal to:"+ nMin;»

  }

  If the value is greater than the value of the field more...

  If (nVal > nMax1) {}

  sError = "Please enter a value less than or equal to:"+ nMax1;»

  }

  If the value exceeds the maximum. possible value

  If (nVal > nMax2) {}

  sError = "Please enter a value less than or equal to:"+ nMax2; "

  }

  The attention of the user and deny the value

  If (sError) {}

  App.Alert (sError, 0);

  Event.RC = false;

  }

  }

  Call the function

  range_validate1();

  The function can be placed in a JavaScript script at the level of the document, but the last line should be the custom for the field validation script. Replace "Text1" in the line that contains the statement getField to the actual name of the other field.

• How to ban field validations to perform programmatically

  I use JDeveloper 11.1.1.3 g. I am a new bie and any help would be appreciated.
  My problem: I have a jspx page in which I added two tabs.
  In the 1st tab - I have a few buttons and inputText fields. I have also required properly defined field validation.
  In the 2nd tab - I have another set of some inputTest of buttons and fields.
  
  Now when I'm in the 1st tab and when I click on my button "submit" my 1st tab field validation is terminated correctly.
  But when I click on the name of the second tab, I see once again the field validation 1 tabs by dragging, who prevents me to navigate on the 2nd tab.
  
  How can I stop the validation on the ground being pulled when I just navigate to 2nd tab.
  My field validations shoud fire only when I click on the corresponding button.
  
  Please help me.
  
  --
  Zee
  
  Published by: 804703 on December 21, 2010 12:41 AM

  Hello

  Try to set the immediate property to true for the element to which you want to bypass the validation.

  Check out this blog.

  http://jobinesh.blogspot.com/2009/08/how-to-skip-validation.html

  Arun-

• Form field validation script?

  Hi all, I'm unable to find Court field validation in an Acrobat document I created. I don't want that get submitted, so I don't want to go that route, but I'm trying to understand how to have 3 fields in my document are validated to ensure they are filled until the form is flattened and saved. I found many examples online, but they are all different, and none seem to work right. I know it is something simple, but I'm just not hitting the right solution. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.

  What I would do, is to create a function at the level of the document, something like:

  // Document-level function, coded for clarity
  function validateFlattenAndSave() {
  
      // Get the field values
      var f1 = getField("text1");
      var f2 = getField("text2");
      var f3 = getField("text3");
  
      var v1 = f1.valueAsString;
      var v2 = f2.valueAsString;
      var v3 = f3.valueAsString;
  
      // Build up an error message string
      var s = "";
  
      if (!v1) {
          s += "Field: " + f1.name + " is blank.\r";  // \r = carriage return
      }
  
      if (!v2) {
          s += "Field: " + f2.name + " is blank.\r";
      }
  
      if (!v3) {
          s += "Field: " + f3.name + " is blank.\r";
      }
  
      // If any fields are blank, alert user and do not proceed
      if (s) {
          app.alert(s, 1);
          return;
      }
  
      // Code to flatten and save goes here.
  
  }
  

  The code could be made less wordy, but you should get the idea. If there are more fields, I have probably to specify field names in a table and use a loop to search for empty values, adding to the string of alert, according to the needs.

  Call this function in the event that you have your current code as follows:

  validateFlattenAndSave();
  

• Not available by default field validation

  I have a demo environment and a recent CTE - environment creeping.
  
  I tried to replicate the changes made in demo to my environment ETC but was surprised to observe that when I clicked on change for a certain PickList field (Editable), the applet does not appear an option for the field Validation, default value is also a list of choices unlike my demo environment where I could write a function.
  
  
  Can someone explain this please.

  It seems that the advanced management of field is not enabled in your environment. Contact the customer service.

• Field Validation expressions can be triggered on an update of a record.

  I have validation of default field set to 3 areas of account representing sales area (region, market, branch), which pulls information from 3 user fields and fills the fields account 3 when new accounts are created by the RCSR, we used JoinFieldValue to achieve this, and those who are currently working a lot when new records are created. These 3 fields are also integrated to report only displays associated demographic info to where the accounts are located in the area.
  
  The problem is if the record moves to another owner who is located in a different area, the field validation does not occur again, and the info in these 3 areas may now be inaccurate. I would like to than the field validation at the new fire for these three areas, each time that a change of owner field. Is this possible? How? Can I configure a validation rule field on each of these 3 fields in addition to the default field Validation rule?
  
  Any help would be appreciated.

  Hello!

  You add a workflow rule to keep this 3 fields filled with the values of the owner.
  The default value you put on these fields work only on creation. So with a workflow such as the following, I think you'll get what you want:

  Registration type: account
  Event: before you save the changes
  Condition: * [< owner >] <>PRE ('< Owner >') *.
  Action 1: update the field region with the same value that you put in the default value field
  Action 2: Update the field market with the same value that you put in the default value field
  Action 3: Update the field branch with the same value that you put in the default value field

  When then owner will be changed, these 3 values are updated with the values of the new owner.

  I hope this will help, do not hesitate to ask for more!

  Max

• default field validation rule

  Please,
  can someone help me find some information about the default field validation?
  I tried to create a validation rule for the field ContactEmail in Contacts, when I was testing created expression, I discovered that some sort of validation rule is already implemented. When I entered e.g. "gggggg.gg @" in the Email field I got the answer "* obligatory valid email", but it is not an ERROR to my validation rule, so I guess there must be a default validation on this field rule.
  
  I would ask, where can I find some other information about these default rules and how do I put or change.
  
  Thank you very much

  The Siebel email format mask is ' % @%.» % ».

  It is applied by Siebel and you have no control of it. The rule is also enhanced during the data import.

• Check box form field validation

  Hello, I have a question about the field validation
  
  Principle: When the indexed check box is checked, indexed text indexed AND 1 text 2 must be filled.
  
  I tried this in the field on field checkbox validation
  
  * [< IndexedBoolean0 >] <>"N" AND ([< IndexedShortText0 >] IS NULL OR [< IndexedShortText1 >] IS NULL) *.
  
  and this
  
  IIR (([< IndexedBoolean0 >] <> "N"), N, [< IndexedShortText0 >] AND [< IndexedShortText1 >])
  
  the two expressions lead to a validation message when the check box is enabled, but the validation does not disappear when the IndexText1 AND the IndexText2 are completed.
  
  Expressions/code are not my strong point, I would be grateful for anyone to tell me what I'm doing wrong.
  
  Concerning
  K
  
  Published by: user736193 on January 6, 2009 11:51
  
  Published by: user736193 on January 7, 2009 07:27

  Hello!

  Try the following for validating field:

  * < IndexedBoolean0 > = "N" OR (< IndexedShortText0 > IS NOT NULL AND < IndexedShortText1 > is IS NOT NULL) *.

  I hope this will help, do not hesitate to ask for more!

  Max

• A field validation can point to a different record type fields?

  Validation of field based on another field of registration Type
  
  I am trying to generate a validation in a custom object that summarizes the fields under the record type account.
  
  The names of the fields of OBI (the location and the name of the table field):
  "- Take into account the custom settings. S_INT_13 + ""-account of custom settings '. " S_INT_14 + ""-account of custom settings '. " S_INT_11
  
  My questions: peut a field validation, point to a different record type fields? My thought was that if OBI can look in all of the types of records that all CRM must be able, including field validations.
  
  Thank you
  
  David

  Hello!

  I'm afraid that's not possible at the moment. You will have to wait for version 16, I think that having such opportunities.
  The R16 will allow you to create a workflow through different types of records (for example, to create a task on the account related to the service request when a new service request is created). I hope that there will be equal opportunities with the validation rules...

  Hope this will help, do not hesitate to ask for more.

  Max