Field Validation expressions can be triggered on an update of a record.

I have validation of default field set to 3 areas of account representing sales area (region, market, branch), which pulls information from 3 user fields and fills the fields account 3 when new accounts are created by the RCSR, we used JoinFieldValue to achieve this, and those who are currently working a lot when new records are created. These 3 fields are also integrated to report only displays associated demographic info to where the accounts are located in the area.

The problem is if the record moves to another owner who is located in a different area, the field validation does not occur again, and the info in these 3 areas may now be inaccurate. I would like to than the field validation at the new fire for these three areas, each time that a change of owner field. Is this possible? How? Can I configure a validation rule field on each of these 3 fields in addition to the default field Validation rule?

Any help would be appreciated.

Hello!

You add a workflow rule to keep this 3 fields filled with the values of the owner.
The default value you put on these fields work only on creation. So with a workflow such as the following, I think you'll get what you want:

Registration type: account
Event: before you save the changes
Condition: * [< owner >] <>PRE ('< Owner >') *.
Action 1: update the field region with the same value that you put in the default value field
Action 2: Update the field market with the same value that you put in the default value field
Action 3: Update the field branch with the same value that you put in the default value field

When then owner will be changed, these 3 values are updated with the values of the new owner.

I hope this will help, do not hesitate to ask for more!

Max

Tags: Oracle

Similar Questions

  • We can do a field cannot be changed using the field Validation?

    Hello

    Is it possible if we could do a non editable field using the field validation? We cannot do it in read-only because we have a code that uses the selector report to update these fields. Is there a way we can put a posting on the ground that it would throw an error message when a user tries to change this field?

    Thank you

    MB

    Of course, we can use the validation for this:

    Add this to the field Validation:

    PRE ('') = IfNull (FieldValue (''), "XXX")

    Replace FieldName with the actual field name.

    Good luck
    Royston

  • A field validation can point to a different record type fields?

    Validation of field based on another field of registration Type

    I am trying to generate a validation in a custom object that summarizes the fields under the record type account.

    The names of the fields of OBI (the location and the name of the table field):
    "- Take into account the custom settings. S_INT_13 + ""-account of custom settings '. " S_INT_14 + ""-account of custom settings '. " S_INT_11

    My questions: peut a field validation, point to a different record type fields? My thought was that if OBI can look in all of the types of records that all CRM must be able, including field validations.

    Thank you

    David

    Hello!

    I'm afraid that's not possible at the moment. You will have to wait for version 16, I think that having such opportunities.
    The R16 will allow you to create a workflow through different types of records (for example, to create a task on the account related to the service request when a new service request is created). I hope that there will be equal opportunities with the validation rules...

    Hope this will help, do not hesitate to ask for more.

    Max

  • Input string must be no space in the text field - validation of the need.

    Hello

    I need validation on the text field, like I should be able to single string entered in the text field. for examples - if I entered 'new test', it must raise the error. I should be able to enter only 'test '. (single channel)

    Can someone help me to give better suggestion.

    Kind regards
    Harish Sharma

    1002384 wrote:

    Thanks for the reply, but I'm still confused, I put this "not regexp_like (: Px_ITEM, ' [[: space :]]')]])" in PL/SQL Expression validation in the Expression of Validation 1, but I have to put in exp2.

    You seem to be an existing posting of editing rather than creating a new. 2 validation expression is not used with PL/SQL Expression validations: all the necessary code is contained in 1 Expression of Validation. Review validation options Type: those who use the Validation Expression 1 and 2 Expression of validation explicitly state what values will each. Other types of validation use only 1 Expression of Validation or not.

  • The 2 field in the conditional form field validation

    I searched on this forum, but didn't come with anything. I need to package the field validation in a table on the value of another field in the form of tables. How do I refer to a field in the form of table in the Condition section?

    I like to use (in my example SPECIES are the domain I want as my conditional validation on):

    Condition type: PL/SQL
    Expression 1: SPECIES! = "NFSH.

    So I need to know how to run the SPECIES matter in my tabular form in my conditional statement.

    Thank you!
    John

    What version are you on? 4.1 you can create validations of columns as a table and reference columns by using bind variables syntax, such as ": SPECIES.

  • default field validation rule

    Please,
    can someone help me find some information about the default field validation?
    I tried to create a validation rule for the field ContactEmail in Contacts, when I was testing created expression, I discovered that some sort of validation rule is already implemented. When I entered e.g. "gggggg.gg @" in the Email field I got the answer "* obligatory valid email", but it is not an ERROR to my validation rule, so I guess there must be a default validation on this field rule.

    I would ask, where can I find some other information about these default rules and how do I put or change.

    Thank you very much

    The Siebel email format mask is ' % @%.» % ».

    It is applied by Siebel and you have no control of it. The rule is also enhanced during the data import.

  • Delete the message "for free space disk outlook express can compact messages."

    I use a PC with Windows XP SP3. I use Outlook Express to access a mail server via POP3 / SMTP. Several times, I get a message saying "Disk outlook express can compact messages for free space": how to prevent the message from appearing?

    I read the posts in this forum even on users not using only not OE. I use OE, but I want to choose if and when compacting messages...

    Greetings and greetings of the season

    Marius

    Prompt compaction is triggered whenever you close OE 100 times.  So if you compact manually, you don't get invited again until you close OE for another 100 times.  Unfortunately there is no way to change this.  Dbx files shall be compacted.  If they are not, they will move on to an enormous size, and then get corrupted, so it is important to pack on a regular basis.
     
    Steve
     

    I use a PC with Windows XP SP3. I use Outlook Express to access a mail server via POP3 / SMTP. Several times, I get a message saying "Disk outlook express can compact messages for free space": how to prevent the message from appearing?

    I read the posts in this forum even on users not using only not OE. I use OE, but I want to choose if and when compacting messages...

    Greetings and greetings of the season

    Marius

  • Field validation extension background in Dreamweaver CS5?

    I'm doing a background inside a form field validation when you use Dreamweaver CS5. It is not strong enough to conduct "internal". I remember a validation named "Yaromat" behavior which is downloadable as one. MXP and installed using the extensions Manager and accessible via - maybe - one of the Group of experts ' + '.

    I'm looking around only to find available Yaromat behavior in the. ZXP and only for Creative Cloud Dreamweaver format.

    Am I right in my memories and, if yes, anyone know where I can find it?

    Thank you!

    The Yaromat validator was created by Jaro von Flocken. It is out of date and is no longer available.

  • Field validation tab still enter data using regExp?

    Hello

    I use jdev 11.1.2.3

    I have a requirement on the field validation tab...

    I have a form that is not duplicate value accept value already existed DB table means so when back of the same value and tab on this high area error message (the code is already exist)

    How to achieve this can someone help me with the code...

    Thank you.

    The solution is given in my other post. Implement a valueChangeListener in your beans. In the listener method call an application module method that checks the new value that you get from the event. If the new value is already in the DB add a message of faces in the listener for changes in value and set the new value to the old value to avoid the false value is found in the user interface.

    Timo

  • PDF - 2 criteria form field validation?

    Is anyone know how can I get a pdf digital to be validated in a range but also form field to validate that the value is equal to or less than the value of another digital field?

    Thank you!

    I think the following custom validation script will do what you want:

    function range_validate1() {}

    Do nothing if the field is empty

    If (! event.value) {}

    return;

    }

    Initialize variables

    var sError = "";

    nMin var = 0;

    var nMax2 = 26;

    var = nVal + event.value;  User entered, converted to a number value

    Get the field value, converted to a number

    var nMax1 = + getField("Text1").value;

    If the value is less than the minimum

    If (nVal< nmin)="">

    sError = "Please enter a value greater or equal to:"+ nMin;»

    }

    If the value is greater than the value of the field more...

    If (nVal > nMax1) {}

    sError = "Please enter a value less than or equal to:"+ nMax1;»

    }

    If the value exceeds the maximum. possible value

    If (nVal > nMax2) {}

    sError = "Please enter a value less than or equal to:"+ nMax2; "

    }

    The attention of the user and deny the value

    If (sError) {}

    App.Alert (sError, 0);

    Event.RC = false;

    }

    }

    Call the function

    range_validate1();

    The function can be placed in a JavaScript script at the level of the document, but the last line should be the custom for the field validation script. Replace "Text1" in the line that contains the statement getField to the actual name of the other field.

  • How to ban field validations to perform programmatically

    I use JDeveloper 11.1.1.3 g. I am a new bie and any help would be appreciated.
    My problem: I have a jspx page in which I added two tabs.
    In the 1st tab - I have a few buttons and inputText fields. I have also required properly defined field validation.
    In the 2nd tab - I have another set of some inputTest of buttons and fields.

    Now when I'm in the 1st tab and when I click on my button "submit" my 1st tab field validation is terminated correctly.
    But when I click on the name of the second tab, I see once again the field validation 1 tabs by dragging, who prevents me to navigate on the 2nd tab.

    How can I stop the validation on the ground being pulled when I just navigate to 2nd tab.
    My field validations shoud fire only when I click on the corresponding button.

    Please help me.

    --
    Zee

    Published by: 804703 on December 21, 2010 12:41 AM

    Hello

    Try to set the immediate property to true for the element to which you want to bypass the validation.

    Check out this blog.

    http://jobinesh.blogspot.com/2009/08/how-to-skip-validation.html

    Arun-

  • Not available by default field validation

    I have a demo environment and a recent CTE - environment creeping.

    I tried to replicate the changes made in demo to my environment ETC but was surprised to observe that when I clicked on change for a certain PickList field (Editable), the applet does not appear an option for the field Validation, default value is also a list of choices unlike my demo environment where I could write a function.


    Can someone explain this please.

    It seems that the advanced management of field is not enabled in your environment. Contact the customer service.

  • Check box form field validation

    Hello, I have a question about the field validation

    Principle: When the indexed check box is checked, indexed text indexed AND 1 text 2 must be filled.

    I tried this in the field on field checkbox validation

    * [< IndexedBoolean0 >] <>"N" AND ([< IndexedShortText0 >] IS NULL OR [< IndexedShortText1 >] IS NULL) *.

    and this

    IIR (([< IndexedBoolean0 >] <> "N"), N, [< IndexedShortText0 >] AND [< IndexedShortText1 >])

    the two expressions lead to a validation message when the check box is enabled, but the validation does not disappear when the IndexText1 AND the IndexText2 are completed.

    Expressions/code are not my strong point, I would be grateful for anyone to tell me what I'm doing wrong.

    Concerning
    K

    Published by: user736193 on January 6, 2009 11:51

    Published by: user736193 on January 7, 2009 07:27

    Hello!

    Try the following for validating field:

    * < IndexedBoolean0 > = "N" OR (< IndexedShortText0 > IS NOT NULL AND < IndexedShortText1 > is IS NOT NULL) *.

    I hope this will help, do not hesitate to ask for more!

    Max

  • We hit our internal certificate ceiling Windows Server 2008 R2. How many certificates can be triggered?

    We hit our internal certificate ceiling Windows Server 2008 R2.  How many certificates can be triggered?  Here's the error received:

    Log name: Application

    Source: Microsoft-Windows-CertificateServicesClient-registration auto

    Date: 24/09/2012 10:31:16

    Event ID: 64

    Task category: no

    Level: WARNING

    Keywords: Classic

    User: n/a

    Computer: xxxxxxxx.dot.com

    Description:

    Certificate for the local system with footprint 0e ee 1 c 61 33 56 d6 d7 14 37 22 59 66 2 c 1f be 71 9f 6 b 6F is about to expire or already expired.

    The event XML:

    http://schemas.Microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">

    64

    0

    3

    0

    0

    0 x 80000000000000

    21262

    Application

    XXXXXX

    local system

    0E ee 1 c 61 33 56 d6 d7 14 37 22 59 66 2 c 1f be 71 6F 6B 9f

    Post in the Windows Server Forums:
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/

  • Outlook Express can compact messages. How can I disable this error?

    OUTLOOK Express on Windows XP very annoying, it's almost each and every time I click on anything whether to open or close any program, etc...

    An error message is displayed: OUTLOOK Express: to free up disk space, Outlook Express can compact messages.

    This can take up to a few minutes.      OK or CANCEL

    It's on my computer for several years now and bugs the heck out of me.  How can I remove it so he won't?

    ALSO: All programs when opening are reduced to the minimum (small format) forces me to click on the big box next to the RED X at the top right?

    Why this is happening and how to remove this problem.  I do NOT need to expand all my programs constantly from the start?

    Thanks for your help Mike G.   * E-mail address is removed from the privacy *

    I do not use OE so I really should stay out of it, but I have it in my notes that can get you started and then other people may also help:

    I advise all to first understand what is happening and then decide how best to treat for your environment:

    If you are talking about a message that says:

    To free up disk space, Outlook Express can compact messages. This can take up to a few minutes.

    Automatic compaction of Outlook Express files was introduced in Service Pack 2.

    If you are using Windows XP, there is a registry value called:

    Compact Check Count

    It is located in the registry for a key that looks like this:

    \Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0 HKCU\Identities\ {51909A0B-63EE-4EB3-A9A2-7CFA23C1ADCF}

    Whenever you leave OE (not when you open it), the value of the counter increases by an increment (increment is not a verb so you can't increment something and a counter cannot be incremented).  When the value of the counter gets to 101, the next time you close OE asked you to compress messages.

    There are two things that will increase the value of the counter.

    Exit from Outlook Express will increase the value of the counter.

    If you have Windows Desktop Search installed, it will increase the counter every time it works which is usually at least at each reboot.

    If you use Outlook Express, and Windows Desktop Search, the counter will be increased more frequently — whenever you close Outlook Express and whenever Windows Desktop Search launches when you restart.

    So if you have Desktop Search installed, which will increase the counter of an increment, each time that you start and if you open and close OE ten times a day, your meter will be at eleven after only a day.  Repeat this for 9 days and you will see this message.

    Even if you are not using Outlook Express and only using Windows Desktop Search, which will still increase the meter, so when the meter reaches 100, Windows Desktop Search will prompt you to compress messages at the next reboot even if you use not OE.

    This is because Windows Desktop Search is configured by default to search for the Outlook Express database if you are using OE or not.

    No matter how the counter is increased, if you use at least one of these two, eventually you will see this message appear sooner or later.  But you can stop it when you understand.

    Did you know that the "increase" is not a verb?  If you cannot 'increment' (or decrement) a counter.  You can increase or decrease an increment, however.

    You can compress data when prompted (which resets the counter to 0).

    You can change the registry and reset the counter to hand to buy some time until you see the message again.

    If you do not use Outlook Express and only using Windows Desktop Search you can tell Windows Desktop Search to never watch the Outlook Express database (or uninstall the Windows Desktop Search if you do not use).

    To remove the Option of Windows Desktop Search index to the database of Outlook Express follow these steps:

    Click Start, settings, Control Panel, Indexing Options, change, clear the box Outlook Express, OK, OK, to save the settings and reboot the system so that the changes will be effective.

    After the Outlook Express recommended for use (which would include the normal database maintenance) will prevent you from seeing the message in the first place.  If you see the message that you might want to reconsider how you use Outlook Express and the risks of data store corruption of occasional or misuse (risk behaviours).

    Most people using Outlook Express or Windows Desktop Search agree just remove the indexing Option in Windows Desktop Search and keep the meter that is built into Outlook Express so that they will remind to compact the database from time to time.  If you had to sort of do not maintain your Outlook Express files, it would be risky for your messages.

    Windows Desktop Search is a memory and CPU of pigs anyway, so you better system performance if you just uninstall it.

    Here is an article with some other information:

    http://www.oehelp.com/OETips.aspx#2

Maybe you are looking for