'Dup Object Id' is a required field. (Siebel > Disqualification connector)

Hello

I use Siebel 8.1.1.3 and the Oracle Disqualification Connector for Siebel (Disqualification Version 11).

When you create a duplicate in the entity record 'account' in Siebel, I get an error message:

'Dup Object Id' is a required field. Please enter a value for the field. (SBL-DAT-00498)

Seems as if something is missing in my setup - but where...? !

There are two appropriate places.

(1) the field in Siebel mappings, where the 'Id' of the BC account field must be mapped to the id of the entity required by the matchmaking service of entity Disqualification ("entityid' in the latest versions) - see section 7.2 of the integration of the Disqualification Siebel guide: Oracle & reg; Enterprise data quality

2) file properties of Siebel Disqualification connector needs a specific reference to the id field so that it can correlate the responses. It is the part of the section "ideelement" account Match the dnd.properties file that configures the connector. By default it is mapped to compte.ID, so if you do use BCS in Siebel it didn't need to be changed, and it is more likely that (1) field mapping is missing or incorrect.

Kind regards

Mike

Tags: Fusion Middleware

Similar Questions

  • Oracle Siebel Disqualification connector: against what database it check duplicates?

    Good evening

    I'm writing an application design for a solution that will make the use of the Oracle Disqualification Siebel connector. Disqualification seems very interesting, but I have trouble understanding the documentation.

    First question is about the audit of direct duplicates. A software that needs to run a check for duplicates needs access to all of the data in the system, so no Disqualification. But how does it work? -According to the installation document, database connections and mappings are necessary only if you use a database - staging and staging databases are required for batch processing.

    The live system (check accounts + contacts duplicates on create / update) isn't a batch: it's a Web service.

    Disqualification, but how do I know which fields should be used, if we don't have jobs > don't use staging databases > have no mappings?

    Thanks in advance...

    Hello

    Disqualification uses a stateless architecture where she provides matching services to applications. Corresponding uses two services - key generation service and a matching service.

    First, the key gen service is run in batch on all existing records in the application. The keys are written in a simple table (about record ID + value).

    Then, for "online processing", the cluster service is called for any document which should be added or updated ("driving record") and returns several key values.

    The application then performs 'selection of candidates' by querying the system for all records that share these core values. It then sends the driving record and its candidates to the corresponding function. The matchmaking service returns candidates who are a decent level of match (beyond a configurable threshold) with driving record and adds a note (how the game is strong) and other information on the nature of the game. (Siebel can only use the partition.)

    The matches can be processed by the application. This can include the treatment of matches on a certain score as an automatic match and/or can mean presenting possible matches to user control.

    If the application is a hub, or otherwise has the ability to merge, it can then generate a master updated record, which must be regenerated (another call to the function of clustering).

    This approach ensures there is not need to synchronize data between the application and the Disqualification, guarantees transactional integrity and appropriate (for example, no lag in a record being available for the match against) and you can hear DQ services can easily evolve between several machines without worry about data match against because it is sent on messages. Disqualification service delivery is extremely effective because of the Disqualification of memory, etc. multithreading.

    A note is that when the Disqualification is attached to Siebel, this architecture (that is, the ability to use the Disqualification key generation service to ensure the selection of appropriate candidates), is available since version 8.1.1.10 of Siebel.

    The process is summarized in Section 6 of the Guide Services Customer Data Services Business package:

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E48549_01/doc.11117/e40733/TOC.htm

    Kind regards

    Mike

  • JavaScript application: I need to validate 1 page of a multipage requiring field doc are not empty.

    Here is the Javascript code I have so far and it is not working properly.

    He's back "Zip" when any required field is empty and it won't accomplish what I want to do because I need to validate that a single page of a 10-page document.

    Any help would be gladly appreciated.  I'm definitely on the bus of struggle.

    var emptyFields = new Array(); Table to contain the names of incomplete fields;

    var oField; a variable that contains the test field object;

    var numArray = [1, 2, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 25, 26, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 43].

    for (var i in numArray) {}

    oField = this.getField (this.getNthFieldName (i));

    If (oField.type! = "button" & & oField.required ") {}

    check according to the type of field

    {Switch (oField.type)}

    case "button":

    break;

    case 'checkbox ':

    case 'radiobutton ':

    If (oField.value == oField.defaultValue & & oField.value == "Off") emptyFields.push (f.name);

    break;

    case "combobox":

    case "listbox":

    case 'text ':

    if(oField.Value == oField.DefaultValue) emptyFields.push (f.name);

    break;

    case "signature":

    if(oField.Value == oField.DefaultValue) emptyFields.push (f.name);

    break;

    by default:

    App.Alert ("Field not processed" + oField.name + "type" + oField.type, 1, 0);

    break;

    }

    }

    }

    If (emptyFields.length > 0) {}

    App.Alert ("error! ("You must fill in the following fields: \n" + emptyFields.join ("\n"));

    }

    Here is my final product for sharing:

    var emptyFields = []; Table to contain the names of incomplete fields;

    var oField; a variable that contains the test field object;

    var numArray is ['field1', 'Field2', 'field3'];.

    var index = 0;

    var len = numArray.length;

    Console.println ("length of the array:" + len);

    for (var i in numArray) {}

    Console.println ("Index:" + index);

    Console.println ("numArray:" + numArray [i]);

    oField = this.getField(numArray[i]).value;

    Console.println ("oField:" + oField);

    ++ index;

    check according to the type of field

    If (oField == "") {}

    var a = this.getField(numArray[i]).valueAsString;

    Console.println ("Value:" + a);

    emptyFields.push (numArray [i]);

    }

    If (index == numArray.length & emptyFields.length > 0) {}

    App.Alert ("you must fill in the following fields: \n" + emptyFields.join ("\n"));

    }

    }

  • Adobe, checking the forms that required fields are completed-Java Script

    I inserted two Java Scripts in my form - one for the verification of the required fields are filled and then one to generate an email pulling a line of object custom, as shown below:

    var emptyFields = [];

    for (var i = 0; i < this.numFields; i ++) {}

    var f = this.getField (this.getNthFieldName (i));

    If (f.type! = "button" & & f.required & & f.display == display.visible ") {}

    If ((f.type=="text" & & f.value== "") |) (f.type=="checkbox" & & f.value=="Off")) emptyFields.push (f.name);

    }

    }

    If (emptyFields.length > 0) {}

    App.Alert ("error! ("You must fill in the following fields: \n" + emptyFields.join ("\n"));

    }

    this.mailDoc ({' bUI:false, cTo: '[email protected],[email protected] [email protected]', bassujetti: ' form of Bugzilla for: '+ this.getField ("Bugzilla Title") .value +' - this.getField ("Bugzilla ID") .value + "" ""})

    Question: After the error window shows the fields that were not completed, when I click on OK, the e-mail window.

    QUESTION: How can I avoid that the window of e-mail to display until all the fields are filled?

    Thank you!

    There must be a space after the 'else '.

  • Bypass Validation required field required in dynamic form PDF

    I faced a difficult situation, where some fields are required, but we need allow the rule of validation (required) required bypass when you save the form and require to fill in these fields when you submit the form. In other words, to allow a flexible control when to enable / disable this feature.

    I wanted to put in place a flexible solution, and I will post my findings here. Appreciate your comments to improve.

    Steps to follow:

    1. mark the fields returned as required.

    2 specify 'Empty Message' as "this field can not be empty", or similar.

    3. specify the "Message of Script Validation" as 'this field must have a correct value before submitting', or similar.

    4. create a Global Variable-level form something like 'StopTotalValidation' and '1' as the default means default, turn off Validation for some cases.

    5. for areas that require this type of control, add the script (to be defined later) on the event to "validate":

    myTools.validateForRequiredField (the);

    6. create a Script object "myTools" and add the following script:

    function initStringFunc() { }

    Call this function to initialize Document

    String.prototype.Trim = function() {}

    return this.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g,"");

    }

    String.prototype.LTrim = function() {}

    Return this.replace (/ ^-s+ /,' ");

    }

    String.prototype.RTrim = function() {}

    Return this.replace (/------s+$/,' ");

    }

    String.prototype.isEmpty = function() {}

    return (this == null) || "This.Trim ( == );"

    }

    }

    function setNodeProperty (, of theNode Dubien newValue) { }

    if (theNode [property] ! = newValue) {

    theNode [property] = newValue;

    }

    }

    function isNodePropertyEmpty (theNode, property) { }

        var result;

        if (theNode == null || theNode [theProperty] == null) {

            result = true;

        } else {

    result = theNode [theProperty] .isEmpty ();

        }

    returns the result;

    }

    function disableTotalValidation() { }

    StopTotalValidation.value = '1';

    }

    function enableTotalValidation() { }

    StopTotalValidation.value = '0';

    }

    function isTotalValidationOn() { }

    back StopTotalValidation.value ! = '1';

    }

    function isTotalValidationOff() { }

    back StopTotalValidation.value == '1';

    }

    const conRequired = '(mandatory)';

    function validateForRequiredField (theFld) { }

        //

    / / Bypass required field Validation when the overall Validation is OFF.

        //

        var result = false ;

        if (theFld) { }

    If (theFld.mandatory & & theFld.mandatory == "error") { }

    If (myTools.isNodePropertyEmpty (theFld, "rawValue")) { }

    myTools.setNodeProperty (theFld, "rawValue" conRequired);

                }

    If (isTotalValidationOn()) { }

    If (isNodePropertyEmpty (theFld, "rawValue") | ) theFld.rawValue.toLowerCase) == conRequired.toLowerCase ()) {

                        result = false;

                    } else {

                        result = true;

                    }

                } else {

                    result = true;             

                }

            }

        } else {

            result = false;

        }

    returns the result;

    }

    7. now click on the button 'save' call the function "disableTotalValidation()" and click on the button 'submit' call the function "enableTotalValidation()".

    I just finished the implementation of the solution above, and according to my initial tests, it works fine.

    I'll post this to my Google Docs workspaceand provide updates their.

    T arek.

    Hi Niall,

    In fact, it is not that some require and some do not need validation...!

    The fact is that fields that are 'Required' rule ignored should only and only if the form is "saved" from the Save"" button.

    The 'Required' rule should be triggered only and only the user is clicking on the submit"" button.

    I think I can make use of your approach. The only problem I see now is how to mark the item of of these fields with the details the user of LiveCycle Desinger interface requires? This means, I have to call a script on the initialize event of these areas, which is more work and more confusing for other developers. As I use a non-standard feature of the interface user Desinger.

    In my case, I added a simple invocation of the event 'validate' to a common function for all areas that need to follow this simple rule "bypass validation required...". »

    But, I really like your solution. In fact, I understand what you're doing, but now the following questions are triggered:

    1. What is the meaning of three time equal (=) in the statement of JavaScript "if"?

    2 I need more information on the use of methods 'createNode()' and 'namedItem().

    Tarek.

  • Required field in the subform "hidden".

    I have a set of 3 radio buttons. If #1 is selected, then a subform with a field appears. When the poster, there is a required field. It all works very well. What does not work is if the user selects #1 then decides to choose #2 instead, the subform correctly is "hidden", but the field is still regarded as required. I don't know how to solve this problem. Here's the script:

    Create a variable to hold the document object

    var v1 = form1.page3.accessApps.TextField11.rawValue;

    accessApps

    If

    ((v1 == "") || (v1 == null) )

    {

    xfa.host.messageBox ("Please list the applications in that the associate should have access");

    xfa.host.setFocus ("form1.page3.accessApps.TextField11");

    }

    Add just the line of the script that you use to show/hide the subform, or the field.

    if (x)
    {
         FieldName.presence = "visible";
         FieldName.mandatory = "error";
    }
    
  • Issues of script on required fields

    I'm an absolute newbie to scripting, so I do a lot of copy and paste and editing of online. Here's my problem: I am creating a licence application form in LiveCycle Designer ES 8.2 (one free with Acrobat Professional 9). I have a dozen or require fields (basic demographic information) that I made on the form (what I've done through the object > value > palette user entered-required). I have a checkbox that holders would check if they operate at several facilities. I 'found' how (read: Google searched and copy and paste), and I know it works because when they check the box of the border around the text box turns red which indicates a required field. If the required fields are not filled, I want a message when they try to print telling them that they must fill in the required fields. I "knew" how to do this, but the script required me to individually list each field that is necessary. How do I get this error message, taking into account the text field that may or may not be required on basis if they have ticked the checkbox or not?

    Thanks in advance,

    Scott

    You can run all the commits on a form with a single command and he wil return a true case of failure of one of the controls or a false if there is no validation error. So now the button that the user clicks (there must be a regular button) you can write code like this on the click event:

    If (form1.execValidate () == false) {}

    App.Alert ("you did not fill all the required fields...")

    } else {}

    Write here your print command...

    }

    This assumes that your root form node is form1 (look at the top-level in the view of the hierarchy node).

    Hope that helps

    Paul

  • Required field for nominations

    Hello

    I am wanting to create a new mandatory field for nominations (activities). I was hoping that this area would not be required during the synchronization process in outlook and required only when you manually create a walk-through for CRM.

    I found that my synchronization process fails because of this required field. Is having a field compulsory in CRM on demand, but not required in the synchronization process Outlook anyway? (Leave the field empty and it ask when the first update of the registration)?

    I bet you did the required field on the object of the activity of the moment. Remove this requirement at the level of the object and make the requirement on layout level. On your users in mode make sure you that the field is required.

  • Required fields

    Given:

    form with several fields of text entry.

    the value of LOV some fields becomes invalid - not required for the operation.

    To submit:

    pl/sql procedure takes values of all the elements and, based on the values passed did he magic.

    Problem:

    required fields are marked as "required" in the apex. When LOV disables them, of course, they have a value, and a problem during "submit page" (e.g..

    "First Name must have some value. »).

    I'm hesitant to mark all items as 'non-compulsory' unceremoniously since all the elements are necessary (when they are activated by LOV) and the Red "*" is a good way to remind a user to enter a value.

    What would be a better solution?

    hope it makes sense

    P.S. help to 'Value' for the element leads to believe that 2 conditions must be met so that automatic checking of ' not null ' kick - point must be visible and '' necessary '' status = "YES". This is not true. required = yes and "point invisible triggers still control null nit.

    AZZ,

    You can set the attribute 'Required value' = 'No' and let the model as "Necessary", it will show the "*" when the element is visible. Then you can create a new type Validation "IS NOT NULL" to a Condition of ' Item = value '.

    Thank you

    Erick

  • SelectOneChoice required field validation problem

    Got a query on the selectonechoice required field validation

    Below is the code works well, I generate the list of static elements (VO)

    < af:selectOneChoice value = "#{bindings." Division.inputValue}.

    label = "Division" styleClass = "Division".

    required = "true" autoSubmit = 'true '.

    shortDesc = "#{bindings." Division1.hints.ToolTip}.

    ID = "soc1" >

    < af:forEach elements = "#{bindings." Var Division1.Items}"="row">

    "< f: selectItem itemLabel =" #{row.label} "ItemValueOptional =" #{row.label} ".

    ID = "si21x1x25" / >

    < / af:forEach >

    < / af:selectOneChoice >

    The question is how to add "- Select -" in the above code and default value "- Select -" selected must, if the value is "- Select -", he must request the validation

    I want to be the label = "- Select -" to be selected by default

  • Highlight the required fields

    Hello. I have a form with many elements like select the list, text box, and date picker. These are the required fields of the form with the required model and required value set to Yes also. I want to emphasize these required fields with the pale yellow background when loading the page. Anyone can guide me please?

    For Multi Select Value:

    $('.select2-choices') .css ('background-image', 'none').css('background-color','yellow');

    And then, you add a line like this for each required field:

    $(' #s2id_ITEM_NAME.select2-choice') .css ('background-color', 'red').css('background-image','none');

    Replace nom_element with the name of the element in the page, something like P101_LOGIN, etc.

    Sergio

  • Name attribute in the object entity column is required.


    Hi all

    I use jdev 11.1.1.7.0. I try to insert a row into a table that has six attributes. One of the default attributes to current_timestamp during creation of the table itself.

    Trying to insert a line after you set the values of five other attributes using vo.insertRow (row); and run the validation action I get name(default attribute) in entity object attribute column is required. I even checked refreshment after the condition of all the attributes of OT (ie., checked the update but also insert). Please help me find the error.

    Kind regards

    Matthew M.

    Hi all

    Turned off the option mandatory attribute selected by default in the object-Edit entity attribute. I am able to insert the line now.

    Thank you

    Mani.

  • Mark a required field in Oracle BPM

    Hello

    I want to mark a field as required in Oracle BPM ADF UI but I am unable to do so as we do in Oracle ADF. So whenever an initiator completes the form and if it leaves an empty field, its application should not be submitted. Please see the attachment snap for detail, thank you very much

    RequiredField.PNG

    The simplest solution is just to type "true" (without the quotes) in the field of the "Required" property for the field office on the form.

    Note that the field 'Account Nature' is already a field required on the form.  If your human task data XSD based, here's how you can make sure that 'Office' is a required field on all forms where it is placed.  First of all, note that your "AccountNature" is already a field required on the form.  The reason is that the item in your XSD for AccountNature probably looks like this:

    If you look at your 'Office' in the XSD element, however, it probably looks like this:

    Delete 'minOccurs = "0" ' for this item before generating the shape of the human task and this field will be also necessary.

    Dan

  • Multiples of the same object/value in a contact field

    Hello

    In our table of Contacts of the E10, I feel a very strange behavior with a field called 'Type of Contact'. The field has been set as a drop-down list.

    Suddenly, multiples of the value stored in this field in the documents that get 2-way sync between E and SFDC, Ont. Thus, for example, if the value of the field

    has been 'Operator', the actual value is passed to 'OperatorOperator '. And the more you synch, the value is (as seems to be added).

    Then, the value would be "OperatorOperatorOperatorOperator".

    Wake up to the problem and setting values is tricky, because in the E10 user interface, you won't notice them if you use a drop-down list.

    I then changed the field to be a textbox to think what might help. And there is progress here. If there are more than two objects of value in the field,

    they present themselves. IF there were only two, everything looks ok just as you can see in the screenshot below:

    More survey close using that an outgoing external call Test reveals, however, that the value is actually duplicated:

    Also, if you have opened upward the selected record under Contacts the contents of the field (after changing text box):

    and then remove the selection (by tapping the button Delete), you could actually get a hint that something does not always work with the field:

    The cursor remains in the right-hand side of the text box, while he should have all the way to the left.

    Finally, I tried to fix the multiplied values SFDC and autosych back to Eloqua, but unfortunately the values do not get it fixed but

    keep duplicate values stored in.

    Any other questions/experiences? Is it a problem with the autosynch get leads NOT to crush, but rather just adding?

    WBR,

    -tatu-

    Some additional screenshots: fi

    The choice list values:

    Yep!

    That did the trick. It must have been a flaw in the external call-out who copied the value out. would have not thought about it in the first place...

    PS. and of course the external call test has shown that the field mapping was abt to do, IE send a duplicated value (although the field could have only a single (or double) value in db at the time.)

    WBR,

    Tatu

  • Required fields on forms

    Currently, we build all of our forms in HTML and uplaod in Eloqua... This does not allow us to... "required" fields to order the to Eloqua, you need to create your form in the Eloqua model.  someone has found a simple way around this... an ability to make the required fields in the form?

    Paul, the jQuery validation plugin (one of the many available) makes it very easy to add validation in your forms client-side and will also keep your code much cleaner & easy to manage than the cut and paste options, especially if you need to change the form or add new fields to a later date, etc.

    Take a look below:

    http://docs.jQuery.com/plugins/validation

    http://Speckyboy.com/2010/06/22/50-jQuery-Plugins-for-form-functionality-validation-security-and-customisation/

    If you need a helping hand with this, feel free to drop me a line

    See you soon

    Chris

Maybe you are looking for