Error: Rowkey has no primary key attributes

Similar Questions

• Make required error appears only the primary key generated in prior Database Table insert trigger

  Dear all,

  I am a beginner in the ADF and am under Jdeveloper Studio Edition Version 12.2.1.0.0.

  
  

  I'm trying to insert a record, I created the trigger for insertion prior to get the primary key and set some other default values.

  
  

  On the page, I did read-only primary key column and false required.

  
  

  When I try to save - commit (Programmatic), I get errors for the required value. How can I stop this errors.

  
  

  Secondly, I also tried changing the agent to disabled on the attribute View object that raised the error below:

  
  

  < oracle.dfw.impl.incident.DiagnosticsDataExtractorImpl > < DiagnosticsDataExtractorImpl > < createADRIncident > < incident created 148 to key problem "DFW-99998 [oracle.jbo.PersistenceException] [oracle.jbo.server.RowReference.verifyPrimaryKeys] [Proposals]" >

  
  

  Hoping for help.

  
  

  Thanks and greetings

  
  

  Arif Khadas
  

  If the primary key values from DB sequence, you can follow this approach:

  Using the sequence of database in ADF - Souza Waslley Blog

  Oracle Fusion Middleware Technologies: ADF 11 G: generate the primary key sequence number

  Otherwise, instead of DB trigger, create the DB function that retrieves the value of the PK and call stored function in the overloaded method create() entity:

• creating view error table contains no primary key materialized

  I am trying to create a materialized view, but I get an error indicating that the table on which the materialized view is being created doesn't have a primary key.
  

  Create materialized view LEA_N(lea) 
  as        select SUBSTR(sn,1,3) 
  from        comqdhb.school; 
  
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-12014: table 'SCHOOL' does not contain a primary key constraint

  I read that it can be rectified using rowid
  
  but where them specify rowid.
  
  Thank you.
  
  Published by: Trooper on January 1st, 2009 05:02

  Rider wrote:
  But the use of rownum is a bad idea is not because the rowid continues to change for each request.

  Not bad, although I agree that it is not optimal, since rownum and rowid are two different things. A rowid does not change for each request.

  Rownum: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/pseudocolumns009.htm#SQLRF00255
  ROWID: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/glossary.htm#CNCPT2103

  Kind regards
  Rob.

• Can we create an APEX form based on a Table that has no primary key

  Hello
  
  I have a requirement.
  I need to create a FORM based on a table with no primary key, but is having a Unique key. I can use as a replacement for primary key Unique key.
  
  but when I tried to create a form, I received the following message.
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tables from the source forms and forms in a table must have a primary key
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  Thank you
  Deepak

  Hi Deepak,

  Because the form create on a table includes Wizard steps additional, more complex that we did not want to add to the wizard create a new Application.

  Joel

• Insert some values into multiple tables. One of the tables has a complex primary key.

  Hello, I am using Jdeveloper version 11.1.2.3.0

  I have a FORM_TYPE table and another table Str. The table of Str is used to translate the strings from the name of the table which are read from another program from the database and used to generate forms...

  The FORM_TYPE table has a relationship with the table of STR via formtype.title_str_id = str.str_id.

  STR. table has a primary key which is based on the mf_language and str_id. columns I generated the entity for the table of STR, but impossible to insert new values of add-on application for some reason any... It is said that recording invalidates its own entity...

  I am trying to create a table that will be editable and will have the column Description, name, cdes in English, Str in French etc...

  To create a Form_Type and at the same time insert new values for each language. But can not do the inserts of the new work of STR...

  Also the FormType.TITLE_STR_ID already has a lot of null values in the database.

  SELECT FormType.DESCRIPTION,

  FormType.FORM_TYPE_ID,

  FormType.NAME,

  FormType.PAPER_REPORT_FORMAT,

  FormType.PAPER_REPORT_NAME,

  FormType.TITLE_STR_ID,

  in. En_str str,

  in. STR_ID,

  en.object_name en_object_name,

  Fr. Str,

  Fr. STR_ID,

  Fr.object_name,

  of the. Str,

  of the. STR_ID,

  du.object_name,

  BG.Str,

  BG. STR_ID,

  BG.object_name

  OF FORM_TYPE FormType.

  (select str.str_id, str.mf_language_id, str.str, str.object_name

  of mf_language ml, str

  where ml.mf_language_id = str.mf_language_id

  and ml.code = 'fr') en

  (select str.str_id, str.str, str.object_name

  of mf_language ml, str

  where ml.mf_language_id = str.mf_language_id

  and ml.code = 'fr') en,.

  (select str.str_id, str.str, str.object_name

  of mf_language ml, str

  where ml.mf_language_id = str.mf_language_id

  and ml.code = 'from'),

  (select str.str_id, str.str, str.object_name

  of mf_language ml, str

  where ml.mf_language_id = str.mf_language_id

  and ml.code = 'bg') bg

  WHERE

  FormType.title_str_id = en.str_id and

  FormType.title_str_id = fr.str_id and

  FormType.title_str_id = du.str_id and

  FormType.title_str_id = bg.str_id

  Each table that you want to update must have its own entity object. You need to connect it to an another VO/OS using the associations/view links

• [SOLVED] Export Oracle SQL Data Modeler is missing a PRIMARY KEY on the DDL script

  I use data 4.1.888 maker to create an ER diagram and generate a DDL her script.

  The diagram contains more than 40 paintings, most of them have a primary key defined.

  For some reason any there is a table that has a primary key defined, but which is ignored when I export the model to a DDL script.

  It is the "wrong" key (even if it is checked that it is not found on the generated DDL script):

  

  This is where the key is set:

  

  And it is the preview of the DDL (Yes, primary key up there shows):

  

  This is what happens if I try to generate the DDL for just this (still not generated primary key) table:

  

  Has anyone had the same problem? Any ideas on how to solve it?

  There is no error in the log file, but when I run the generated DDL script there, and then I realized that I was doing something wrong:

  The table MEMBERS had a mandatory foreign key from another table, which in turn had a mandatory key against MEMBERS himself.

  So even if I could generate this primary key on members myself, and then run the the constraint definition that returned an error on the DDL script, I could not perform an insert operation on any of these two tables because of the constraint.

  I revised my design and realized relationships was not mandatory. I unchecked the mandatory box on the definition of the constraint and everything went well.

  I could reproduce the problem and the solution on a diagram with only two tables, so I'm sure that's it.

  Anyway, the Data Modeler is "a failed" silently in this kind of situation. It should be fairly obvious to an experienced designer that I was doing something wrong, but it is not so obvious when you deal with dozens of tables and all their relations and this is your first time using the Modeler.

  Thanks for your reply :-)

• validate the primary key

  If the user enters two combination should trigger the error

  For example I testcode table with the primary key is combination of code1, code2, if use enter the same value for both two code I have to raise error am in jdeveloper 11.1.1.7.0
  

  see this

  Zeeshan Baig blog: define the constraints of unique keys for Non-primary key attributes ADF-British Colombia

  http://www.gabrielsideras.com/2010/09/28/ADF-unique-key-validation/

  http://www.databaseskill.com/1654786/

• Validation auto-generated Primary Key not Null

  Hello
  
  I have a generated Assistant shape, that has a primary key that is generated automatically by a trigger before insert. In my form, primary key is initially empty and after that the user saves the form, then the primary key generates a number and that it fills in the form. I currently have a non-Null on the form validation, after that the user submitted the form and wants to update. How can I keep the validation non-Null on the form so that the user can write again at the start of the database, with the empty primary key field? Auto Wizard generates this out of the constraints of the table, and I would like to know if it is a validation required?
  
  
  Thank you
  Mary

  Well, you do NOT have NULL validation on the primary key point and that causes the problem that the user create folder? Started to run or remove the 'never '. I don't think it's necessary that you display as 'read only '.

  Kind regards
  Hari

• WITH THE HELP OF SEPARATE OR ONE GROUP WHEN IN PRIMARY KEY CLAUSE

  I WANT A WAY TO EFFECTIVELY PERFORM AGGREGATE FUNCTIONS ON A PARTNER OF THE PARENT TABLE CHILD TABLE AND RETURN ALL THE COLUMNS IN THE PARENT TABLE AND CALCULATED FROM THE CHILD TABLE COLUMNS.
  
  THE PROBLEM IS THAT WHEN I USE GROUP BY ON ALL FIELDS IN THE PARENT, INCLUDING THE PARENT TABLE TABLE, I THINK THAT ORACLE TESTS ALL THE COLUMNS IN THE GROUP BY CLAUSE WHEN IT SHOULD GO HAS THE PRIMARY KEY MAKES ALL IMPLICITLY SEPARATE LINES.
  
  I CREATED TWO TEST TABLES AND RRAN SOME QUERIES TO TEST AT THE SAME TIME.
  
  HERE ARE THE TABLES:
  
  CREATE TABLE A_PARENT_TABLES
  (ACTIVATE THE NUMBER PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID (20.0) NOT NULL,)
  PT_GRP_FEILD1 NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  PT_GRP_FEILD2 NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  PT_GRP_FEILD3 NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  PT_GRP_FEILD4 NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  PT_GRP_FEILD5 NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  PT_GRP_FEILD6 NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  PT_GRP_FEILD7 NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  PT_GRP_FEILD8 NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  PT_GRP_FEILD9 NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  ENABLE CONSTRAINT A_PARENT_TABLES_PK PRIMARY KEY (PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID)
  );
  
  CREATE TABLE A_CHILD_TABLES
  (ACTIVATE THE NUMBER CT_CHILD_TABLE_ID (20.0) NOT NULL,)
  CT_PARENT_TABLE NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  CT_VALUE_TO_SUM NUMBER (20.0) NOT NULL ACTIVATE.
  ACTIVATE THE CONSTRAINT A_CHILD_TABLES_PK PRIMARY KEY (CT_CHILD_TABLE_ID)
  CONSTRAINT CT_PARENT_TABLE_FK FOREIGN KEY (CT_PARENT_TABLE)
  REFERENCES A_PARENT_TABLES (PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID) ON DELETE CASCADE ALLOW
  );
  
  
  I HAVE INSERTED THEN 20,000 RECORDS IN THE A_PARENT_TABLES TABLE AND 60,000 IN A_CHILD_TABLES (3 FOR EACH PARENT)
  I THEN RAN THE FOLLOWING QUERY:
  
  
  -ALL FIELDS GROUGPED
  SELECT
  PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID,
  PT_GRP_FEILD1,
  PT_GRP_FEILD2,
  PT_GRP_FEILD3,
  PT_GRP_FEILD4,
  PT_GRP_FEILD5,
  PT_GRP_FEILD6,
  PT_GRP_FEILD7,
  PT_GRP_FEILD8,
  PT_GRP_FEILD9,
  SUM (CT_VALUE_TO_SUM) AS SUMED_VALUES
  Of
  A_PARENT_TABLES,
  A_CHILD_TABLES
  WHERE
  PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID = CT_PARENT_TABLE;
  
  GROUP BY
  PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID,
  PT_GRP_FEILD1,
  PT_GRP_FEILD2,
  PT_GRP_FEILD3,
  PT_GRP_FEILD4,
  PT_GRP_FEILD5,
  PT_GRP_FEILD6,
  PT_GRP_FEILD7,
  PT_GRP_FEILD8,
  PT_GRP_FEILD9;
  
  
  At TOOK 2.42 seconds set IN ŒUVRE
  
  
  
  -ONLY GROUPED FIELDS
  SELECT
  PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID,
  SUM (CT_VALUE_TO_SUM) AS SUMED_VALUES
  Of
  A_PARENT_TABLES,
  A_CHILD_TABLES
  WHERE
  PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID = CT_PARENT_TABLE
  GROUP BY
  PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID;
  
  
  At TOOK 0.71 seconds set IN ŒUVRE
  
  
  WHY DOESN'T THE FIRST QUERY ARE REALIZING THAT HAVING PT_PARENT_TABLE_ID (PRIMARY KEY) IN THE GROUP BY CLAUSE MEANS THAT NO OTHER COLUMNS SHOULD BE CHECKED?
  
  HOW CAN I ACHIEVE THE EQUVILENT OF THE FIRST QUERY IN A WAY MORE EFFECTIVE?

  Hello

  As you can see on the plain explain command
  This full table scan done query1 on A_PARENT_TABLES
  query2 done index range scan on A_PARENT_TABLES

  This is one of the reasons why query2 runs faster than the application 1.

  Why complete analysis of table to query1?
  Its because you want in query1 to display other fields present in A_PARENT_TABLES and is not present in the primary index of this table, that is why he must go to the table for the data.

  Hope this helps.
  Concerning
  Anurag Tibrewal.

• Primary key several columns with Date - parameter problem

  All,
  I'm having a problem where I can not find the answer to. I looked upstairs and down nothing helps. Help, please.
  
  The issue is that I have a table that has a primary key of several columns and a column is a date, and the other is a string. I have a simple search and I want a picture update of the results table that users can click on and go to another page to update this record. The question is when I launch an appeal based on the updated image, I also want to define the settings based on the record that I have selected. So I put the string parameter and that works very well. The problem is with the date. When I put the setting date this market but he chops off the coast of the timestamp. Later when I try to access this setting "("dateParameter") pageContext.getParameter"; that it will bring a date as December 15, 2008 but I need the whole date and time stamp (i.e., December 15, 2008 10:20:33) to properly identify the record.
  
  Help, please!
  
  Thank you
  Colby J

  Hello

  because each parameter go into url as a format string, so you will never get the full date with timestamp setting, the solution would be to

  1.) set a fire on the photo update action, give his name to the event as "update."

  (2.) by clicking Update photograph fires this event.

  (3.) processFormrequest in the controller method

  OAApplicationModule am = pageContext.getApplicationModule (webBean);

  If ("update".equals (pageContext.getParameter ("event")))
  {
  This will give you the select line when you click Update

  String rowReference = pageContext.getParameter (OAWebBeanConstants.EVENT_SOURCE_ROW_REFERENCE);
  Line VORowImpl = (EmployeeSummaryVORowImpl) am.findRowByRef (rowReference);
  Timestamp sdateVal = (String) row.getAttribute ("Date value");

  This will transfer the values to the next page
  pageContext.putTransactionTransientValue ("transferdvalue", sdateVal);

  }

  and in the next page, you can get the value as follows

  timestamp getDateVal = pageContext.getTransactionTransientValue ("transferdvalue" l);

  hope this will solve your problem, please let me know if you face any problem

  thanx
  Pratap

• Problem by setting the primary key: relaxation Assigned primary key in the sequence.

  I have a table and a trigger for insert/update on the table. Trigger I get the game of the primary key of a sequence. I tested unit by inserting records in the table. It works very well. Kets primary key the next sequence number.
  
  I use this table as an entity in my adf application. The primary key attribute is set to "DBSequence". But when inserted I do not receive the following sequence for the primary key. Instead it is inserting the temporary number - ve that assigns the adf.
  
  I use JDeveloper 11 g.
  
  
  Can someone tell me what could be the problem?

  Your trigger should be something like:

  create or replace TRIGGER "SID_ASSIGN"
   before INSERT
   ON MY_TABLE
   FOR EACH ROW
  
  BEGIN
  
  if :new.SID is null or :new.SID < 0 then
     SELECT MASTER_SID_SEQUENCE.nextval into :new.SID from dual ;
  end if;
  END;
  

  You can refer to the guide of Dev of 11g for more details on this...

  Julian

• Database offline: how to configure the primary key storage options?

  I want to model a large database that has its primary keys in their own table space. I don't see primary key storage Options as I do for the index and the properties of the table. JDeveloper supports storage options capture for primary keys? I use JDeveloper 11 g 11.1.1.0.0.
  
  Published by: flszen on October 17, 2008 13:42

  Hello

  I entered an enhancement request for this

  Thank you very much

  Susan
  http://www.susanduncan.blogspot.com

• What is this error represents "another user has changed the line containing oracle.jbo.Key [21 primary key]."

  Mr President.

  What is this error represents "another user has changed the line containing oracle.jbo.Key [21 primary key]."

  Concerning

  You get this exception quite often when you have a business in PL SQL layer, but you can safely ignore (suppress) it by substituting the lock() method in all implementation of your entity classes.

  /*** customizing locking management: 
  * Because attribute values can change 'outside' ADF standard life cycle, 
  * when optimistic locking executes, the exception "Another User Changed the Row" is thrown. 
  * In this case, we execute locking again, ignoring the exception 
  */ 
  public void lock() 
  { 
   try 
   { 
    super.lock(); 
   } catch (oracle.jbo.RowInconsistentException e) 
   { 
    if (e.getErrorCode().equals("25014")) 
    { 
    super.lock(); 
    } 
    else throw e; 
   } 
  }
  

• ADF: addition of the JSF error message: another user has modified the line containing oracle.jbo.Key [185 primary key].

  When you call the function DB. The function performs its operation, but shows an exception. In JDev 11.1.2.3

  And there is not another user. I'm testing alone.

  ADF: addition of the JSF error message: another user has modified the line containing oracle.jbo.Key [185 primary key].

  oracle.jbo.RowInconsistentException: Houston-25014: another user has modified the line containing oracle.jbo.Key [185 primary key].

  The problem is that the function db has a commit and my code also. However the db function called once in a case.

  Thanks a lot for your help.

• Another user has modified the line containing oracle.jbo.Key primary key

  Hello

  In jdev 12 c

  I have a jsf page in a BTF, and there is a display of master(A:readonly table)-detail(B1:readonly table)-detail(B2:editable form) this page

  The (readonly table) B1 and B2 (editable form) are created on the same data control. There is no other layout compicated or functions on this page.

  The B2 (editable form) was based on a VO whose id is a type of DBSequence, and the new value has been created by a database trigger.

  I put

  All the columns that are updated by a database trigger or a PL/SQL call, are enabled for "Refersh on Insert" (for the case of the insertion) or "Refresh update" (for the case of update) or both in the entity object xml file.

  But when I submit/validate the page (form B2), the error msg 'another user has changed the line containing oracle.jbo.Key primary key' was always held randonly.

  And after the error msg, I can commit the data successfully by press the button validate again.

  How can I solve this problem?

  Thank you.

  The problem is that you use the pl/sql code. It is run out of the box. When a change is made in a row in this way, the framework removes upward, neither knowing that the change was done rightly and throws an error message.

  The code (which I copied from the other thread for reference) intercepts the error and re executs the lock in the case of the specific error.

  /*** customizing locking management:

  * Because attribute values can change 'outside' ADF standard life cycle,

  * when optimistic locking executes, the exception "Another User Changed the Row" is thrown.

  * In this case, we execute locking again, ignoring the exception

  */

  public void lock()

  {

  try

  {

    super.lock();

  } catch (oracle.jbo.RowInconsistentException e)

  {

    if (e.getErrorCode().equals("25014"))

    {

    super.lock();

    }

    else throw e;

  }

  }

  


  Timo