Everything I play for the sound of the web as people are in a well, a lot of echo.

Similar Questions

• Illustrator CS4 - when I save it for the web my vectors are pixelated. Help!

  I've recently updated to CS4 (I know, I'm always late), but since when I "save for web" my vectors appear pixelated. It seems worse when I want a transparent background. My pictures are for the web and it won't.

  I have read a lot about this and can't seem to fix my problem, but here is what I tried: anti-aliasing is checked, view > preview raster, view > preview overprinting, the object > pixelation and probably a few other things. If anyone can help me with this problem it would be GREATLY appreciated! I have attached a picture so you can see what I mean. I created this schematic in Illustrator CS4 and saved for the web with a transparent background and, as you can see, it seems pixelated everywhere.

  

  jskopinsky,

  It shouldn't look like this as a GIF, but what happens if you save it as PNG24?

• Best video for the Web?

  I created a site offering artists around my city. The most important thing is the videos and that's what I have a problem with. Can you help me?

  I started with the flv files swf turned and who was allowed. The problem was he wouldn't play on IPAD and other devices.

  So, I read online that a mov or mp4 file was good. Today, I received so many responses from those who said that the video is so slow that they have not even watch.

  I tried to increase my size to a size close to youtube, so it was more visible then my first posts.

  The site is

  www.adamsstreetsessions.com

  Thanks in advance

  . FLV is currently the best format of video container for the Web...

  As a rescue use swfobject for Flash detection and provide a .mov as ALT content file

  Link to swfobject:

  http://code.Google.com/p/SWFObject/

  Sample .flv video that plays on the iPhone:

  http://www.cidigitalmedia.com/tutorials/Qt/play_qt.html

  relief is .mov file. View the source code to see how it works.

  A potential problem of slow download .mov files is if the moov atom is at the end of the file rather than the beginning... Hey, I don't do this kind of things, I just tell you about it. The download is not slow, it's just that the entire file has download before he plays. If the moov atom is at the end of the file, the full .mov file must be downloaded before the video starts to play. It will be not progressive download as an .flv file (another reason why .flv is the video container of choice).

  You can restructure the .mov files are needed by using QuickTime Pro, and save as.

  Google to know the exact details or check here:

  https://www.ezs3.com/members/login.cfm?hpage=Checking_Metadata_or_Moov_Atom_Location.cfm

  If the video bitrate and/or the size is a problem, investigate it to an old post:

  Video bitrate

  One of the principle of goal setting is to "begin with the end in mind". In this case, it will be very difficult to give good recommendations because the end is not defined. So I'll just make a few assumptions and you can correct me if necessary.
  First, I'll assume that you convert Flash, whether you want to broadcast this video on the Internet. If that's true, then going to make some assumptions about your potential viewers Internet connection download speeds. Let's just say that most have at least a 1.5 MB connection or faster.
  OK, that would mean that a video bitrate of half that generally provide a video download that is not interupped by the buffering (most of the time anyway). So assuming a video bitrate of 750 kbps, what would be the optimal display size?
  Before decide us, here's a little info on the bitrate. To read more high quality, the bitrate of the video is directly related to the size of the screen. In other words, more display, incoming data more are needed to correctly display the video. Think of bitrate in terms of a can of paint. If you have 1 quart of paint, you might be able to do a very nice job on an area of 32 X 24 feet. But if you try to stretch the same amount of paint on a surface area of 64 X 48 feet, the coverage is not as good and you get mediocre results.
  Similarly, a video display to 640 X 480 pixels will require 4 times the baud rate as a video displayed at 320 X 240 pixels to produce the same quality. Thus, for example, a video with a speed of 100 kbps, 160 X 120 displayed will produce the same quality results as a video with a bitrate of 1600 kb/s is displayed in 640 X 480.
  So, to sum it all, 750 Kbps, even up to 1000 kbps video rates can usually get delivered high-speed Internet on most connections. Higher rates may work for connections very fast but will cause problems for viewers with slower connections. Video display size has a direct impact on the final quality. In the range of 750 to 1000 Kbps, display size should be maintained around 450 or 500 width max (and whatever the height proportions claims). Yes it can be displayed larger, but the quality will suffer.
  Sounds like the audio settings are fine, especially for delivery on the Internet.
  Regarding the framerate, maintain the framerate video original raw for best results. Therefore, if the clip was shot at 24 frames per second, let him.
  In regards to video converters, you have the Flash 8 Video Converter? It works very well for the video to be delivered over the Internet. Don't forget, you're taking a Cadillac of video (h.264 HD) version and cram into a Chevy body so he can work on the Internet.

  Best wishes

  Adninjastrator

• What are the recommended settings for the export of photos for the web?

  I am a photographer, if the images would be used for my blog... and still need of decent looks.
  They are also the images that I approach clients, again, they need for decent, but would be the right size for the web.
  I played a bit, and when we maintain quality"to 100%, but the setting at 72 dpi, the image remains the same size at 300 dpi.
  So I got the quality up to 50%, but even slight vignetting seemed absolutely horrible. (Highly visible sections of different colors.)
  So now I'm stuck.
  72 dpi and 300 dpi made no difference in size (cannot explain this one.)
  100% quality seemed fine but was too big for the web.
  50% quality was mediocre at best.
  Any suggestions? What is the standard practice?
  Thanks in advance.

  I would use a quality of 70-80 and also resize the image under 'Image size' for example, you pick a long edge of (for example) 1200 pixels.

  The ppi (dpi not) makes absolutely no difference, it's completely out of words and useless in this situation, as you found it. Just ignore it.

• What happened to the image field when you create a field of type of image for the Web application?

  What happened to the image field when you create a field of type of image for the Web application?

  The answer is that the point of the IMAGE has been changed to the MEDIA.

  Sorry, Ian, what research for this discussion, I got no results. All good and thanks for the carillon. Hope everything goes well.

  Mouma

• How to get a GIF to loop PE11 with MAC 10.6.8? 480 x 320 x 72 pix/in. layers saved for the web, see animate, listen to excerpts times very well but the saved file is not

  can't understand why the gif file loop. Implemented 480x320pixels of photo frames 5 x 72pix / in in PE11, creating a layer for each. Each visible layer. Registered for the web. Checked to animate. The preview plays very well. But when I save the file and then click on the saved file to play, he re - opens the layers instead of playing the loop. The only registration option that appears is "IMAGES ONLY".

  Using photoshop elements on MAC 10.6.8 11. Either I'll put this in wrong place or is there a hidden setting I need to change?

  It you open in a web browser? That's where he plays, not in PSE, overview, or on your desktop.

• What size my image of background layer should be for the web?

  I do a logo design for someone I know and he wants that he placed ontop of a background texture steel. I source on an image of good quality, but despite my diligence in trying to understand how the resolution and the size of the image, I can't seem to grasp what I should do with it. I saw countless videos, but it must be a problem with the ol' brain ' in the head I.

  It is likely (at least for now) just for the web. My goal is just get it right so that it looks crisp and clear on the screen.

  The image I have is 1024 x 1384 pixel, 72 dpi. Yes 14.2 inches wide by 19.2 inches high.

  I have to change this at all? I'll be crop the image, but I'm worried that I will do it's too small and so it should be expanded, and I could meet some blurring.

  Should I expand? I heard that this isn't the most ideal thing.

  72 dpi is higher than the resolution must be for images of the screen, but is there an advantage to hit? Why couldn't just do 300 dpi for the heck of it?

  Do I need to pay attention to the thumbs, or is - this just good guide for when you print something?

  I'm honestly just trying to get my head around all of this, so that in the future, I can't spend as much time to know what I have to do. Everything I read and any help is greatly appreciated.

  I believe that we have the impression that the image was for the entire background. Being its a banner among the dimensions should be much smaller and therefore can be a picture of lower resolution due to this fact.

  With respect to the other dimension, this will depend on your design. For example it will fill the width or height of the screen?

  With respect to models, you send a single image to a web browser and the browser itself repeats this image. This is why it is desirable. Your image can be 10 x 10 pixels pixels in the right circumstances. For any detail real chances are she would most likely be around 512 x 512. More this image is the faster it will load, it is that she may have more details. Its up to you to find this balance.

• Several pages for the web?

  Hello. I am very new to InDesign, and I'm using CS5. I'm working on a flyer for an upcoming event. I do a page of printing, legal size and have just completed, using Kuler colors in CMYK mode, and everything seems good.

  I also wanted to do a separate document, so I put it on a web page.

  I did a file... New... document, intended for the web, it size in 1024 x 768 and used Kuler colors in RGB. When I was building the document, needed me more space than just a page. So I added a page to fit all the info, photos, etc., and I ended up with two full pages of my document. Here's what I don't understand...

  I do not how to put the document 2 page on my web page. It doesn't look like two separate pages like that now? Should I make a long page so that I can scrool just down the document as on an ordinary web page? I checked the size of my "legal book" size paper by changing the ruler from inches to pixels guides and came to 610 wide x 1010 long. Do I just do the size of my document online?

  Thanks for the help.

  Just use the page tool to extend your first page down and put your additional info on the bottom.

  Here's the thing, however, that "for the web" is not intended to do, it's for publications that are... heck who knows what it's for!  The normal method is just to export your first print version of smaller file size and post in downloadable PDF format.  Or if you want a web page uses another tool, not Indesign.  I would like to start by talking to the person who organizes or assembles the web page you're going to be showing on and asking them what they would recommend in your case.

• How can I change my mood Message in Skype for the Web?

  How can I change my mood message in Skype for the Web?

  People of good news: you can now change your mood message in Skype for the Web

  Just click on the picture at the top left of your profile, and then click the small icon of pencil next to the message of change in activity.

• Possible security for the Web-based Configuration

  My colleagues and I found something very interesting today... Despite having configured the FTP security settings (which have been confirmed to set up and in funcitoning. I can't open an FTP session to our remote target without specifying a username admin and the password) If you open the configuration tool based OR web in a browser, you can send via FTP to and from the target using the file remote browser without being connected to all! Everyone knows this?

  Apparently, these permissions are separate from FTP, but you can define these special permissions on the page of the security configuration for the web-based configuration utility.

• I can't play back gammon on the web site of area that he always told me to restart

  I can't play back gammon on the web site of area that he always told me to restart

  Hello

  What site Web access you play Back Gammon?

  If you are referring to the MSN Back Gammon game then the question you posted would be better suited in the support of MSN games. Check out the link and ask the question.
  http://zone.MSN.com/en/support/article/supporttoc.htm

• Data for the Web service control

  Hello

  I have jdeveloepr User 12.1.3, I WSDL soap, I create the data control for the web service from the WSDL, the problem is when creating data controls the separate parameter that the method, for example, below it is the method that I call the setNotificationAction name and the parameter IN (P_ACTION, P_NOT_ID, P_PASSWORD_ERP, P_TOKEN (, P_USER_ID P_USER_ID_ERP), as below, why the separate parameter that the method?

  Note that I try the binding WSDL SOAP UI and its ok and works as expected.

  

  Resolved by changing the typesList.add (Object.class) at typesList.add (GenericType.class)

• What is the best export for the web?

  What is considered the best export from Adobe Illustrator CC 2015 for the web these days? I know that PNG has the color a bit better than JPEG files. How about SVG?

  What is your recommendation?

  Thank you

  For modern websites of today, vectors are now better saved in SVG. As long as you use the last CC 2015, use file > export to create the SVG (which is newer than the file > save under). It will yield a smaller SVG files.

  Better, photos are saved in JPEG format.

  PNG are not "keep color" better. The JPEG and PNG24 support millions of colors, but a JPEG will be able to compress photographic details better, if you end up with a file of faster loading.

  For HTML Email SVG is not appropriate, so I use PNG or GIF instead (whichever is smaller) to the line drawings in general I want to save it as SVG.

• Best app for the batch processing of photos for the web?

  I would like to know what is the best application for batch processing photos for the web quickly and easily. I'm a web editor and often need to resize, compress, or crop several photos and would like a quick way to configure the basic parameters and processes for example 20 pictures at once. Basically, I'm looking for something with the ability to FastStone Photo Resizer (I'm on a Mac and cannot use FastStone). I remember an once suggested graphic designer LightRoom - would that be a good idea or Adobe has something else? Or maybe not Adobe at all?

  PhotoShop seems heavy for this purpose: it is ideal to make the photo woth that much at the time, but less large to do less with many pictures at once. I know that I can implement some sort of macro-thingie, but I would like to be able to quickly change settings such as the percentage of compression or the width in pixels.

  I don't need a lot of editing tools, mostly just work in pixels, resizing, compression or cropping and save for the web in .jpg and .png - and Mac.

  I hope someone here can guide me in the right direction.

  Hi eval

  I think the best thing for you is Adobe photoshop elements, cover in simple not expensive and all what you want

  Photo Editor software & tools | Adobe Photoshop Elements 14

  concerning

• save multiple files for the web in JPEG max at a resolution of 800%

  I had more than 200 created illustrator files. They all have the same dimensions. I wanted an adobe illustrator script that saves all files for the web in jpeg.

  Export options must be max.resolution of all files should be increased to 800%.

  I think it's the reasoning

  Open a folder with all the files

  loop through each file

  Save for web each in jpeg format to the quality of resolution and up to 800%

  the names of all jpeg files should be the same from these illustrator files (if possible)

  I will be very thankful to you if you could help me

  Best regards,

  Hassan Ali

  As far as I understand your request it is also possible with a simple action in batch mode.