Execution time of the XML CVI functions increase when loop

Similar Questions

• How to shorten the execution time of the NXT (TETRIX & MATRIX toolkit) brick

  Hello

  How to shorten the execution time of the NXT brick?

  (TETRIX & MATRIX toolkit, running time)

  The software is 2012 LabVIEW for LEGO MINDSTORMS

  Thank you.

  

  

  Hi 40123157,

  You use the module in an appropriate manner, and there is no simple way to improve the time of loop iteration beyond what you've done. Here are my suggestions:

  (1) the i2c commands take a long time. In your application, it may speed up if you run only move the engine only when the engine speed has changed.

  (2) for this particular example, you do not use the release of the report engine. If this VI does not need to run it can be removed.

  (3) If you need to speed up execution other than that, as a user advanced LabVIEW, you can create a copy of the VI of engines to move and change it as you choose. All you have to to the "DC motors' entry is use cluster to array on the cluster, as shown below. I think you can speed it up by running all the settings before the loop (type sensor and fixed connection configuration), and removing the value of power if you send only the values between-100 and 100.

  (4) drawing on the screen can be slow you down here.

  

• Should I wait until the end of the execution time of the query for the execution plan?

  Hello Experts,

  I want to see the execution plan of the query below. However, it takes more than 3 hours. Should I wait all the time to see the execution plan?

  Note: EXPLAIN PLAN for does not work. (I mean that I do not see the actual line number, etc. with EXPLAIN the PLAN of market)

  You can see the output of the execution plan when I canceled the execution after 1 minute.

  My first question is: what should I do to see the execution plan for queries running out of time time?

  2nd question: when I cancel the query during execution in order to see the execution plan, will I see the specific plan of execution or erroneous values? Because the first execution plan seems inaccurate, what do you think?

  question 3: why EXPLAIN the PLAN for the clause does not work? Also, should I use EXPLAIN the PLAN of the clause to this scenerio? Can I see the result of running for long time without her queries?

  Thnaks for your help.

  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64 bit Production

  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production

  CORE Production 11.2.0.2.0

  AMT for Linux: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production

  Select / * + GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS NO_PARALLEL * / J.INVOICEACCOUNT, J.INVOICEID, J.INVOICEDATE, (T.LINEAMOUNT + T.LINEAMOUNTTAX) price

  of custinvoicejour j join custinvoicetrans t on

  substr (nls_lower (j.DataAreaId), 1, 7) = substr (nls_lower (t.dataareaid), 1, 7) and

  substr (nls_lower (J.INVOICEID), 1: 25) = substr (nls_lower (t.INVOICEID), 1: 25)

  where

  substr (nls_lower (T.DATAAREAID), 1, 7) = '201' and T.AVBROCHURELINENUM = 29457

  and substr (nls_lower (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) = '201' and

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT in

  (select IT. Drmpos.avtr_seg_cust_campend ACCOUNTNUM this where THIS. CAMPAIGN = '201406' and THIS. SEGMENT_LEVEL in (', 'E'))

  and J.AVAWARDSALES > 190

  and substr (nls_lower (J.AVBILLINGCAMPAIGN), 1, 13) = '201406'

  "and J.INVOICEDATE between ' 04.06.2014' and ' 13.06.2014 ';

  SQL_ID, dznya6x7st0t8, number of children 0

  -------------------------------------

  Select / * + GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS NO_PARALLEL * / J.INVOICEACCOUNT,.

  J.INVOICEID, J.INVOICEDATE, (T.LINEAMOUNT + T.LINEAMOUNTTAX) price of

  CustInvoiceJour j join custinvoicetrans t on

  substr (nls_lower (j.DataAreaId), 1, 7) =

  substr (nls_lower (t.DataAreaId), 1, 7) and

  = substr (nls_lower (J.INVOICEID), 1: 25)

  substr (nls_lower (t.INVOICEID), 1: 25) where

  substr (nls_lower (T.DATAAREAID), 1, 7) = '201' and T.AVBROCHURELINENUM =

  29457 and substr (nls_lower, (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) = '201' and

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT in (select CE. ACCOUNTNUM of

  drmpos.avtr_seg_cust_campend this where THIS. CAMPAIGN = '201406' and

  IT. SEGMENT_LEVEL in (', 'E')) and J.AVAWARDSALES > 190 and

  substr (nls_lower (J.AVBILLINGCAMPAIGN), 1, 13) = '201406' and

  "J.INVOICEDATE between ' 04.06.2014' and ' 13.06.2014 '.

  Hash value of plan: 2002317666

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name                           | Begins | E - lines. A - lines.   A - time | Pads | Bed |  OMem |  1Mem | Used Mem.

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |                                |      1.        |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |       |       |          |

  |*  1 |  HASH JOIN |                                |      1.   3956.      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |  2254K |  1061K | 2190K (0) |

  |*  2 |   HASH JOIN |                                |      1.     87.  16676. 00:00:01.64 |     227K |   3552.  3109K |  1106K | 4111K (0) |

  |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CUSTINVOICEJOUR |      1.   1155 |  31889 | 00:00:01.16 |     223KO |     15.       |       |          |

  |*  4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_062INVOICEDATEORDERTYPEIDX |      1.   4943 |    134K | 00:00:00.83 |   45440 |      0 |       |       |          |

  |   5.    SIMPLE LIST OF PARTITION.                                |      1.  82360 |    173K | 00:00:00.08 |    3809 |   3537 |       |       |          |

  |*  6 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL | AVTR_SEG_CUST_CAMPEND |      1.  82360 |    173K | 00:00:00.06 |    3809 |   3537 |       |       |          |

  |   7.   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CUSTINVOICETRANS |      1.   4560 |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |       |       |          |

  |*  8 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_064INVLINENUMCAMPAIGNOFPRICE |      1.   4560 |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |       |       |          |

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access("J".") "SYS_NC00299$"="T". "' SYS_NC00165$ ' AND SUBSTR (NLS_LOWER ('J'. "" "" REFFACTURE")(, 1, 25) = SUBSTR (NLS_LOWER ("T"." "" "REFFACTURE")(, 1, 25)).

  2 - access("J".") INVOICEACCOUNT '= SYS_OP_C2C ("EC". ". ACCOUNTNUM'))

  3 - filter("J".") AVAWARDSALES"> 190)

  4 - access("J".") SYS_NC00299$ "= U ' 201"AND "J". INVOICEDATE"> = TO_DATE(' 2014-06-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND

  "J"." SYS_NC00307$ "= U ' 201406"AND "J". INVOICEDATE"< = TO_DATE (' 2014-06-13 00:00:00 ',' syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')))

  filter ((' J'. "INVOICEDATE' > = 'J' AND TO_DATE(' 2014-06-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') '." " SYS_NC00307$ "= U '201406' AND"

  "J"." INVOICEDATE"< = TO_DATE (' 2014-06-13 00:00:00 ',' syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))

  6 filter (("CE". "SEGMENT_LEVEL" = A "OR"THIS"." SEGMENT_LEVEL "=" E"))

  8 - access("T".") SYS_NC00165$ "= U ' 201"AND "T". AVBROCHURELINENUM "= 29457)

  filter ("T". ("AVBROCHURELINENUM" = 29457)

  EXPLAIN PLAN FOR

  Select / * + GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS NO_PARALLEL * / J.INVOICEACCOUNT, J.INVOICEID, J.INVOICEDATE, (T.LINEAMOUNT + T.LINEAMOUNTTAX) price

  of custinvoicejour j join custinvoicetrans t on

  substr (nls_lower (j.DataAreaId), 1, 7) = substr (nls_lower (t.dataareaid), 1, 7) and

  substr (nls_lower (J.INVOICEID), 1: 25) = substr (nls_lower (t.INVOICEID), 1: 25)

  where

  substr (nls_lower (T.DATAAREAID), 1, 7) = '201' and T.AVBROCHURELINENUM = 29457

  and substr (nls_lower (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) = '201' and

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT in

  (select IT. Drmpos.avtr_seg_cust_campend ACCOUNTNUM this where THIS. CAMPAIGN = '201406' and THIS. SEGMENT_LEVEL in (', 'E'))

  and J.AVAWARDSALES > 190

  and substr (nls_lower (J.AVBILLINGCAMPAIGN), 1, 13) = '201406'

  "and J.INVOICEDATE between ' 04.06.2014' and ' 13.06.2014 ';

  SELECT * FROM table (DBMS_XPLAN. DISPLAY_CURSOR);

  SELECT * FROM table (DBMS_XPLAN. DISPLAY_CURSOR ('7h1nbzqjgwsp7', 2));

  SQL_ID, 7h1nbzqjgwsp7, number of children 2

  EXPLAIN PLAN for select / * + GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS NO_PARALLEL * /.

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT, J.INVOICEID, J.INVOICEDATE,

  (T.LINEAMOUNT + T.LINEAMOUNTTAX) join price j custinvoicejour

  CustInvoiceTrans t on substr (nls_lower (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) =

  substr (nls_lower (t.DataAreaId), 1, 7) and

  = substr (nls_lower (J.INVOICEID), 1: 25)

  substr (nls_lower (t.INVOICEID), 1: 25) where

  substr (nls_lower (T.DATAAREAID), 1, 7) = '201' and T.AVBROCHURELINENUM =

  29457 and substr (nls_lower, (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) = '201' and

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT in (select CE. ACCOUNTNUM of

  drmpos.avtr_seg_cust_campend this where THIS. CAMPAIGN = '201406' and

  IT. SEGMENT_LEVEL in (', 'E')) and J.AVAWARDSALES > 190 and

  substr (nls_lower (J.AVBILLINGCAMPAIGN), 1, 13) = '201406' and

  "J.INVOICEDATE between ' 04.06.2014' and ' 13.06.2014 '.

  NOTE: cannot fetch SQL_ID plan: 7h1nbzqjgwsp7, CHILD_NUMBER: 2

  Check the value of SQL_ID and CHILD_NUMBER;

  It could also be that the plan is no longer in the cursor cache (check v$ sql_plan)

  NightWing wrote:

  Randolf,

  I don't understand. What you hear from the above statement that you mean A-lines and E will be incorrect, but the ratio between them remain the same. Therefore, you can deduct the bad things by comparing the differences.

  Thus, A-lines always give a wrong result for cancellation of queries, isn't it?

  Charlie,

  I think that Martin gave a good explanation. Here's another example that hopefully makes more obvious things:

  17:56:55 SQL >-things go very wrong here with a small buffer cache

  17:56:55 SQL >-T2 lines are badly scattered when you access through T1. FK

  17:56:55 SQL >--

  17:56:55 SQL >-"Small job" approach would have been a good idea

  17:56:55 SQL >-if the estimate of 100 iterations of the loop was correct!

  17:56:55 SQL > select

  17:56:55 (t2.attr2) count 2

  17:56:55 3 of

  17:56:55 4 t1

  17:56:55 5, t2

  17:56:55 6 where

  17:56:55   7  /*------------------*/

  17:56:55 8 trunc (t1.attr1) = 1

  17:56:55 9 and trunc (t1.attr2) = 1

  17:56:55 10 / *-* /.

  17:56:55 11 and t1.fk = t2.id

  17:56:55 12.

  T1

  *

  ERROR on line 4:

  ORA-01013: user has requested the cancellation of the current operation

  Elapsed time: 00:04:58.30

  18:01:53 SQL >

  18:01:53 SQL > @xplan_extended_display_cursor ' ' ' ' 'ALLSTATS LAST + COST.

  18:01:53 SQL > set echo off verify off termout off

  SQL_ID, 353msax56jvvp, number of children 0

  -------------------------------------

  SELECT count (t2.attr2) from t1, t2 where

  / / *-* trunc (t1.attr1) = 1 and

  trunc (T1.attr2) = 1 / *-* / and t1.fk = t2.id

  Hash value of plan: 2900488714

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | The NEST | DSB | Operation | Name | Begins | E - lines. Cost (% CPU). A - lines.   A - time | Pads | Bed |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 |     |   7. SELECT STATEMENT |        |      1.        |  4999 (100) |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |

  |   1.   0 |   8 2 GLOBAL TRI |        |      1.      1.            |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |

  |   2.   1.   5.   NESTED LOOPS |        |      1.        |            |  57516 | 00:04:58.26 |     173K |  30770 |

  |   3.   2.   3.    NESTED LOOPS |        |      1.    100.  4999 (1) |  57516 | 00:00:21.06 |     116K |   3632.

  |*  4 |   3.   1.     TABLE ACCESS FULL | T1 |      1.    100.  4799 (1) |  57516 | 00:00:00.19 |    1008 |   1087 |

  |*  5 |   3.   2.     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | T2_IDX |  57516 |      1.     1 (0) |  57516 | 00:00:20.82 |     115K |   2545 |

  |   8 2 2 |   4.    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | T2 |  57516 |      1.     2 (0) |  57516 | 00:04:37.14 |   57516 |  27138 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  4 filter ((TRUNC ('T1'. "ATTR1") = 1 AND TRUNC ('T1'. " ATTR2') = 1))

  5 - access("T1".") FK '= 'T2'.' (ID')

  You say here that I canceled a query after about 5 minutes, and looking at the statistics of content (RowSource) I can already say the following:

  1. the estimation of cardinality of T1 is far - the optimizer estimated 100 lines, but it actually generated more than 57000 lines when the query was cancelled. If this definitely seems like a candidate at the origin of the problems

  2. the query has spent most of the time in search of random table T2

  So while it is true that I don't know final A-lines of this cancelled query information, I can still say a lot of this and begin to deal with the problems identified so far.

  Randolf

• execution time of the procedure

  Hello
  
  I'm working on the Conversion project, there are 7 different procedures that execute one after the other. It takes nearly 17 hours to complete one conversion.
  My question is how can I find out what procedure and/or SQL takes maximum time so that I can fix it. We used dynmaic sql strongly to INSERT/CHANGE/REMOVE.
  We use Oracle 9i.
  
  I tried to use v$ session_longops but there are so many tiny Jules Destrooper in the procedure, which lasts less than 6 seconds to run, v$ session_longops does not display any result.
  

  DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.SET_MODULE(  module_name => 'Proc1', action_name => 'Start'); 
  DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.set_action(action_name => 'Just Started');

  Thank you
  Sandy
  
  Published by: Sandy310 on July 27, 2011 14:42

  You can try to create a table to record the execution time of each procedure...
  For example:

  -table of log´s
  create table executation_log (obj_name varchar2 (120),)
  VARCHAR2 (120) of the event.
  time_execute timestamp);

  -log´s procedure
  create or replace procedure prc_log (p_obj_name in varchar2,
  p_event in varchar2)
  is

  pragma autonomous_transaction;

  Start

  insert into executation_log (obj_name, event, time_execute)
  values(p_obj_name,p_event,SYSTIMESTAMP);

  end prc_log

  declare

  Start

  -call the log´s procedure
  prc_log (p_obj_name-online 'frist_object',
  p_event-online 'start');

  -call your drifter
  frist_object;

  -After the procedure of log´s you call compare the process start and end
  prc_log (p_obj_name-online 'frist_object',
  p_event-online "finish");

  -new
  prc_log (p_obj_name-online 'second_object',
  p_event-online 'start');

  second_object;

  -call once again, once again, once again
  prc_log (p_obj_name-online 'second_object',
  p_event-online "finish");

  end;

  -Drifter, then select table log´s
  Select *.
  of e executation_log
  order of e.time_execute

  Thank you...

• Execution time of the steps

  Hello

  I want to use the stopwatch or a timer noted the moment to take the step bit (say some time by three steps in a sequence.)

  How can I do that I have not found a ts timerin.

  Hello

  You can add a step of instruction before your efforts, with the expression: Locals.intialTime = (seconds).

  After your steps, is the expression of the runtime: Locals.executionTime = Seconds() - Locals.initialTime.

  The result is in seconds.

  Bruno

• Using 'this' inside the XML onLoad function

  Hi all
  
  I use this line of code inside an onLoad() XML:
  
  this.attachMovie ("MasterBtn", "instance_name", this.getNextHighestDepth (), {_x:50, _y:50});})
  
  The 'this' keyword points me to the XML object. Are there alternatives to the use of 'this', as the use of a container element.
  
  
  concerning
  
  John
  http://www.javono.com

  So I guess you want on the main timeline? Here's what I do. That ' it's the best, but it seems to work for me. Outside the XML stuff with my other declarations of variables usually, I add the following:

  var host: MovieClip = this;

  Then in the event handler:

  home.attachMovie (etc.)

  I think it should work.

• problems with the XML that is returned when you call a web service with CF11

  Hi, I ran into an unusual behavior when calling web services.

  I call a web service that returns an XML like this:

  < children >

  < child >

  John < firstname > < / name >

  DOE < name > < / lastname >

  < / child >

  < / children >

  during the call to the web service of CF10, it works fine. However, when the CF11, I don't get this:

  < child >

  John < firstname > < / name >

  DOE < name > < / lastname >

  < / child >

  
  

  no < child >? for some reason, CF11 ignores / hides the highest level XML. This does not happen on previous versions. Why? the server that hosts the web service's CF11 too.
  

  Report it as a bug in Coldfusion. In any case, I recommend making sure your web service returns a string, not an XML object.

  This is because a web service must be universal. Appellants to .NET, Java, PHP, ASP and so on, will interpret a chain exactly the same way. Whereas an object XML Coldfusion is a construction that is heard only in CFML.

  Your return string should also start with the XML declaration, like this

  John

  DOE

  So it is clear to the appellant in which brought the cat.

• Execution time of the timed loop

  When I run a timed loop, even a dummy, I have 100% CPU usage with "RT get CPU loads. The Profiler 'Performance and memory' and "execution trace toolkit" also indicate a maximum time of VI. Is this normal?

  What target RT do you use? If it's a FP, you will always have 100% of the CPU load due to the optimizatio performance.

  Best regards

  Fabio

• Why the execution time increases with a while loop, but not with "run continuously?

  Hi all

  I have a problem of severe weather that I don't know how to fix it because I don't know exactly where it comes from.

  I order two RF switches via a data acquisition card (NI USB-6008). One job at the same time can be selected on each switch. Basically, the VI created for this feature (by a colleague) resets all the outputs of acquisition data and active then those desired. It has three entrances, two chain simp0le controls and a cluster table, that contains the list of all the outputs and some practical information to know what is connected (specific to my application).

  I use this VI in a complex application, and I have some problems with the execution time, which increased whenever I said the VI, so I did a test VI (TimeTesting.vi) to determine where the problem came. In this special VI I record the execution time in a csv file to analyze then with excel.

  After several tries, I found that if I run this criterion VI with the while loop, execution on every cycle time increases, but if I remove the while loop and use the funtionnality "Continuous run", the execution time remains the same. In my high level application, I have while loops and events, and so the runtime increases too.

  I someone could explain to me why execution time increases and how can we avoid this? I have attached my VI test and the necessary subVIs, as well as an image of a graph that shows the execution time with a while loop and «run permanently»

  Thanks a lot for your help!

  Your SetReset_DO VI creates a channel whenever it is called.  And that you never delete a task.

  When running continuously, that it's as if it only runs once and LabVIEW has internal mechanisms to close references that will not be used again.  When a VI is used as a Subvi, LV does not know if she will be called again, and lacks these things until the first level VI stops. You have a memory leak.

  Just as you open and close your file outside the loop for, create your channel out of the loop.

  Lynn

• How to measure the execution time of a specific to a VI process?

  Hello! My VI has two processes: compression and edge detection image and I'm trying to measure the execution time for the process of detection of edge of my VI, but I don't know how to do. Please give me some ideas on how to do it. Thank you!

  There are several ways that you can do.

  -L' one is using the number of cycles before and after your vi to get time like here: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/6F6B9F4E149C80578625652800784764

  - or use the profiling: https://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361H-01/lvhowto/profiling_vis/

  Edit: If you're open to suggestions:

  -You have not to load the image inside the loop instead, make him outside of the loop.

  - And I see of many IMAQ buffers are not removed properly. You can have everything at once by Images (No) by logging in to Boolean TRUE: http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/370281P-01/imaqvision/imaq_dispose/

• sampling time changed the buckle timed

  Hello world

  I use the timed loop to control the DC motor with the vi of PID. in the loop and the sampling time are defined as 0.01 s. However, after I added a few other screws in the loop, for example, writing of measure file.vi, to collect the errors between the angle and the practical perspective of the engine for the time histroty the movement of the motor, we find that the sampling time changed, not always 0.01 s before the vi has been added, but 0.01 or 0.02 s. the entire program desinged to be fininshed with 7 s, now's done it at 9.4 s, that is, execution of the loop time is extended.

  Another thing is, if the sampling time is defined as s 0.05, the sampling time is always 0.05 s and the execution time of the loop is always 7 s as predined, regardless of writing custom file.vi is added in the loop or not.

  As a result, I think that if the complexity of the loop is incresead and time of sampling sets is small, then the actual sampling time will be modified due to the design of things load in the timed loop. What is the reason? If so, are there methods to solve?

  It is important: the collection of the angular error of the engine in the time histrory is very important, which will be used to show the correctness of the settings KP, KI and KD.

  A friend suggested using the queue vi, but I don't really know how to use them. Can someone give some instructions?

  Thanks a lot!

  See you soon

  Cram features in a timed loop is like stuffing 5 books you know that in a book bag 3. The timed loop is only really practical on a rt system, but even in this case, if the code inside requires more time than the period of the loop, there is no magic that the loop can do to increase the execution time. Just point out you that the loop is late. The solution is to remove features from the inside of the loop. Writing to a file of measure is one of the worst if you write to a text file. Look at the producer/consumer model of design that you have examples of. There, you will have a normal loop that you will write to a queue, and a second loop will process data in the queue. Use file > open...

• Using the XML file error

  Hello

  I use an XML file as the source in a map. This worked well until I changed the context during the execution of the mapping.

  Initially, during the execution of the development, it worked without any problem. But when I changed the context to run the Test, he gave me the following error:-

  ODI-1227: task load data-LKM SQL for Oracle-don't work not to connect to the source P6_ACTIVITIES - TEST.

  Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: the object name already exists: P6ACTI_READACTIVITIESRESPONSE in the statement [create table P6ACTI_READACTIVITIESRESPONSE (READACTIVITIESRESPONSEPK NUMERIC (10) NOT NULL, SNPSFILENAME varchar (255) NULL, SNPSFILEPATH varchar (255) NULL, SNPSLOADDATE varchar (255) NULL)]

  This object name, P6ACTI_READACTIVITIESRESPONSE created by ODI is a combination of scheme name defined in the JDBC URL properties (or the first five characters of the XML file) and the element root. Therefore, I don't have any control over the name, unless I have change the schema name property.

  Restart the agent will solve the problem temporarily, but the error will appear again when the context is changed. My question is, how do I create/drop / let agent do this each time that the XML file is accessed ODI. I use ODI 12.1.3.

  Thanks in advance,

  Xmen

  Only, you should be able to query code KM to understand if these tables are created, but generally it will be in the scheme of work specified on your server of intermediate technology.

  We are not allowed to change the KMs, because it would create problems of alimony.

  
  

  Who with Oracle or internally? A large part of ODI power lies in an open framework around KMs and as long as you develop and test carefully any customizations KM I really can't see why the support would be a problem. You can run the table to fall outside the knowledge module, would be - this also be a support issue, the main difference is that a KM custom allows to reuse easier?

• too low execution time

  I tried to measure the execution time. The rate is 1KS/s through to read 100 per channel in a loop of 10 and samples. The time should be about 1000 ms, but it is only 500-600 ms. And when I changed the rate/number of samples, the run time does not change... How could it happen?

  Well,.

  The task inside the loop compensation is something of a problem.  (The error handler must jump on the second iteration)

• Could not create constants/controls/indicators from the XML parser

  Is there a reason I can't create a constant/control/indicator of the XML parser function ref (by right clicking)? I need to make the Subvi in build/read xml files, and it's really impossible without this ability.

  LabVIEW 2012 f3

  This bug has already been reported (CAR 357092) and should be corrected in the next service pack release. For now, here is a workaround:

  "" "" "1. create an indicator of reference from functions ' programming ' file IO" XML "XML parser" New.vi.
  2. right click on the new terminal of indicator 'DOM Document Out' and select Create > command (or indicator).

  3. right click on the new indicator of control / and choose Select XML Parser Class. Then you can choose what class you need.

• You can disable the keyboard autorepeat function?

  I have a bad habit of while asleep at the computer.  This sometimes results in thousands of extra list.  I never use the auto repeat function.  When a key is depressed and kept down, I don't want to repeat.  I know that I can slow it down.  Can I stop all together?

  You can use keyboard settings in the control panel to change the frequency of repetition and the speed, but it will always repeat the keys but not earlier and not too quickly.

  However, if you want to refuse the key to never repeat (without multiple taps), you must use the Accessibility Options in the control panel.

  Start, control panel

  Choose "Accessibility Options."

  (Depending on your view of the Control Panel, you can choose 'Accessibility Options' again once at the next screen task list or you can go directly to the Options settings below).

  On the "Keyboard" tab, check "FilterKeys" and click the button "settings".

  Select the "ignore quick keystrokes" and click the button "settings".

  Do not select the "no repeat...". »

  at the bottom of the box, adjust the time of "keys must be held...". "0.0 (so the key will always be type as soon as you hit it.)