filters in survey mode

I used to be able to put flags/secondary colors on individual images when I got a group is selected in the module of survey, but now when I mark and image with a color, it applies to all images in the survey not only the highlighted

Two copies of I used to be able to score separately when I had some selected in the mode of inquiry but now when I put a second filter on images and image, he does to all selected images

Tags: Photoshop Lightroom

Similar Questions

  • Reorganization of images in survey mode

    What are the restrictions on images in survey mode rearraging? I couldn't understand why it would work cotton and sometimes does not.

    For example, I have a directory up the 2012 main page and in a folder for each month. If I'm in the display of the GRID to the 2012 level and choose the images in survey mode, I can't reorganize. But I'm in the display of the GRID in one of the subfolders, then I can.

    Is this normal? I'm doing something wrong?

    Mode of inquiry honors the same constraints that grid mode. If you can reorganize in the grid, you can in the investigation if:

    Records with no record of the child can be rearranged

    Collections can be organized (includes quick Collection)

    Smart collections cannot

    Parent folders cannot

    The collection sets cannot

  • LR3 Survey Mode: Auto Advance?

    Just upgraded to LR3. In survey mode, is there a way to automatically advance to the next when picture of note and rejecting? Investigation on a series of photos, it would be useful that LR3 would be auto advance to the next in the series picture after I applied a side or pick/reject.

    Turn on just Verr Maj on your keyboard.

    I just tried and it advances as in any other mode, when you apply flags, labels or ratings.

  • new problem in survey mode

    In the investigation of the mode when I have report it now wants to mark ALL the photos instead of just one. Even if choose to remove. She wants to erase everything. It's new. Is there a parameter by mistake, I changed?

    Disable auto-sync in the lower right.

  • Survey Mode Bug?

    After SHIFT clicking on a group of images in the grid view, then select the Mode of inquiry, I try to mark a picture as picked or rejected, but it does so at all against just the picture of a highlighted.  It was not taken place a few weeks ago, but it is now.  I wonder if this is a bug with the new update?  I saw a reference to it on another blog:

    http://feedback.Photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lr_4_1_bug_reject_a_photo_in_survey _ mode

    I hope that this is just something I have switched on by mistake so that I can return to using the mode of inquiry efficiently to shoot my photos.  Thanks for your help.

    Automatic synchronization of the library (= autosync metadata) is perhaps?

  • Investigation of the mode for quick question

    Hello

    I am using Captivate 7 end to create quizzes.

    I would like to use a short questions survey mode. Where are the answers which are written by learners in this case.

    Thank you very much for your answers.

    SEB.

    It depends on both the SGA as on Captivate. You can try a question short answer which is classified and see if the LMS reports the answer?

  • How to mode of inquiry in Lightroom 4?

    Both tutorials I've seen had four icons in the toolbar: grid, compare, Magnifier and investigation. I do not have them in my toolbar. When I try to enter the mode of inquiry, all I can get in the toolbar is the word inquiry statement. With this, I can get that one, sometimes two, images upward in the display, not the images of three or more than I should be able to y upwards at the same time. What I am doing wrong?

    To the left of the study of the word, there should be four small icons. The closest Word survey is to take you to the mode of inquiry. The number of images displayed in survey mode depends on the number of images that you have highlighted in the film. Just to clarify, is your toolbar displayed correctly?

    Added later: in the toolbar, the small arrow to the right of the toolbar, click it and make sure that there is a check mark in the display modes. I think that's what you're missing.

  • Disabling native ring drop-down

    Does anyone know how to disable the native drop-down list of controls of the ring and enum. I work (disabled) when I use the event filter and throw the mouse down event. I pop up my own fall down in a sub VI in this event and it works perfectly. However, when I try to get mouse support for this control via an event loop control, I can't throw the mouse down event because it seems to ignore all the events that are configured for this. I if a timer in case case would give me enough time to receive the event into the loop of surveillance, but unfortunately not good it (never fires). Maybe I should describe a little better:

    I have two event nodes that are put in place to trigger on a mouse down event. The first is filtered to remove from the drop-down list the current LabVIEW. The second loop is top sink my code for my own downfall. This works perfectly for each type of control, I want to (string, digital) except when labVIEW runs special background code for the menu drop down. Why LabVIEW destroyed the mouse down to all the nodes in the event if only one is filtered. I can use the mouse event and it works perfectly, even if I need the mouse down to the additional functionality, I already coded and works. I have a way around this, but I WANT it to work that way for various reasons. I want no additional code in case of loop as a queue or messaging to build to handle this. It would defeat the purpose of my experience (of which I'm sorry I can't be more explicit in the details).

    Why must my code be found in the events node in order to make it work? If there are two nodes of events registered for the same event, they both should receive them without worrying if one removes it by filtering. right?

    Thanks in advance

    Chrisco

    A dark place in the LabVIEW help file:

    To filter events, LabVIEW send event sequentially to each structure set up for the event event. The order in which LabVIEW sends the event filter to each structure of the event depends on the order in which you record events. Each structure the event must rule on the case of event before filter LabVIEW can prevent the next structure of the event. If a case of structure of event changes the event data, LabVIEW passes the data changed to structures of later event in the chain. If emissions of a structure of the event in the chain of the event, LabVIEW does not pass the event of any structure of event remaining in the chain. LabVIEW complete the user action that triggered the event configured only after any event structures treatment handle event without throwing.

    For example, you run the vi with the filtering event loop before running that the vi with the event no filter, the filter event loop would first register (register of events using a vi containing the static events).   Changing the code to save the two events as events filtering and without mods on the first lap of the event should allow you to act first and then filter then.

  • Detected incorrect configuration error - problem of multicast?

    I saw a mistake 'Has detected a misconfiguration' after scoring in the Web client, select a cluster, the tab manage, settings, Virtual SAN subtab-> general.  He went after activating the traffic on the vmk0 VSAN management interface.  I found that by vSphere 6.0 Documentation Center, 'Network Misconfiguration in a Virtual SAN Cluster status' it was probably due to a bad configuration of the multicast.

    I talked to my network admin, who made sure IGMP Snooping has been disabled, and I turned off VSAN, then again once and the error disappeared temporarily.  However, when you choose inside on a specific host a cluster, I still see "host cannot communicate with all other nodes in the active SAN virtual cluster.  The "Misconfiguration detected" error is returned.

    1 is a multicast group must be configured to work?  I am referring to vSphere 6.0 Documentation Center, "Modes of filter Multicast", where it is said:

    Filtering basic multicast mode a Standard switch or Distributed Switch vSphere vSphere transmits multicast traffic for virtual machines based on the destination MAC address, of the multicast group. When you join a multicast group, the guest operating system pushes the MAC address of the multicast group down to the network through the switch. The switch saves the mapping between the port and the destination multicast MAC address in a table of local transfer.


    I guess that does not apply to the VLAN that I've dedicated to VSAN multicast traffic, where IGMP Snooping should be disabled?



    2 cannot not set port 4095 to enable all the VLAN resources shared - is it necessary?

    I thought that when you configure the network on the ESXi server, I thought I should specify 4095 to VLANS allow all trunking 802. 1 q VLAN through.

    As:

    -the documentation I found only goes to 4094 and

    -in the ESXi console, I entered 4095 to the VLAN ID (which failed),

    is the VLAN ID of the management network is good?  Or could it be that traffic for that VLAN even get through on the server because of this?

    3 here is what I understand VMware in terms of this error:

    Cluster form--nodes will not be able to communicate - Has detected a misconfiguration

    Option 1 -Disable IGMP Snooping = > allows to all the through the multicast traffic

    Option 2 -Configure IGMP Snooping Interrogator = > if there is another multicast traffic and you fear that multicast traffic could flood network






    I also had this link to what is required by the side of Cisco, but it does not (gives 404 error).  Can someone give instructions that work?

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/Datacenter/SW/nxSos/multicast/configuration/guide/b_multicast/b_multicast_chapter_011.html






    4. by comparing the results of two servers, they cannot ping each other (addresses 10.27.98.7 *) on vmk1.  My network engineer said that the switchports are that all configured the same.  Any thoughts on why they can't ping?

    [root@host05:~] esxcli ip interface ipv4 network get

    DNS name IPv4 address IPv4 subnet mask IPv4 address Type DHCP broadcast

    ----  ------------  ---------------  --------------  ------------  --------

    vmk0 10.27.98.199 255.255.255.192 10.27.98.255 fake STATIC

    vmk1 10.27.98.71 255.255.255.192 10.27.98.127 fake STATIC

    vmk2 10.27.98.136 255.255.255.192 10.27.98.191 fake STATIC

    [root@host05:~] vmkping - I vmk1 10.27.98.71

    PING 10.27.98.71 (10.27.98.71): 56 data bytes

    64 bytes from 10.27.98.71: icmp_seq = 0 ttl = 64 time = 0,096 ms

    64 bytes from 10.27.98.71: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 64 time = 0.084 ms

    -10.27.98.71 - ping statistics

    2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss

    round-trip min/avg/max = 0.084/0.090/0.096 ms

    [root@host05:~] vmkping - I vmk1 10.27.98.70

    PING 10.27.98.70 (10.27.98.70): 56 data bytes

    -10.27.98.70 - ping statistics

    3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

    [root@host05:~] vmkping - I vmk1 10.27.98.71

    PING 10.27.98.71 (10.27.98.71): 56 data bytes

    64 bytes from 10.27.98.71: icmp_seq = 0 ttl = 64 time = 0.088 ms

    64 bytes from 10.27.98.71: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 64 time = 0,074 ms

    64 bytes from 10.27.98.71: icmp_seq = 2 ttl = 64 time = 0,081 ms

    -10.27.98.71 - ping statistics

    3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss

    round-trip min/avg/max = 0.074/0.081/0.088 ms

    [root@host04:~] esxcli ip interface ipv4 network get

    DNS name IPv4 address IPv4 subnet mask IPv4 address Type DHCP broadcast

    ----  ------------  ---------------  --------------  ------------  --------

    vmk0 10.27.98.198 255.255.255.192 10.27.98.255 fake STATIC

    vmk1 10.27.98.70 255.255.255.192 10.27.98.127 fake STATIC

    vmk2 10.27.98.135 255.255.255.192 10.27.98.191 fake STATIC

    -10.27.98.70 - ping statistics

    3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss

    round-trip min/avg/max = 0.072/0.080/0.089 ms

    [root@host04:~] vmkping - I vmk1 10.27.98.71

    PING 10.27.98.71 (10.27.98.71): 56 data bytes

    64 bytes from 10.27.98.71: icmp_seq = 0 ttl = 64 time = 0,726 ms

    64 bytes from 10.27.98.71: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 64 time = 0,362 ms

    64 bytes from 10.27.98.71: icmp_seq = 2 ttl = 64 time = 0.561 ms

    -10.27.98.71 - ping statistics

    3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss

    round-trip min/avg/max = 0.362/0.550/0.726 ms






    PS: this certainly looks like a network configuration problem

  • Unlocking of the Table of contents

    Hello

    My project includes a few questions in Quiz mode.

    When you navigate to the Table of contents, the learner cannot go beyond the question until it fills the question.

    Is there anyway to unlock the table of contents so that the learner can freely navigate through the table of contents?

    I'm guessing that your answer might be "change the questions in survey mode." The problem is that mode of inquiry does not feedback 'OK!' and 'Wrong' when replying to questions.

    Is it possible to get the best of both worlds?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    THX!

    Also check what setting you have under Quiz > settings > required.  If you want the user to be able to go anywhere, then you should probably have it set to optional, as some of these settings may force the user to answer all questions or even getting them correct before being able to navigate elsewhere.

  • Note individual when images number several selected images

    In Lightroom 4.1 during note (flags, stars or colours) a select group of images all the selected images will have the same indicator applied. For example, if I select 10 images to see in survey mode to compare and choose 1 to be marked as rejected all 10 will be reported dismissed, not only the one. Is there a way to disable this option to select a group of images and score each differently?

    Disable automatic synchronization.

    Sent from the phone.

  • Improvement of the quality of color photo

    Hi all

    I have a few pictures, where I've placed a few products on a white background, but as you can see he is profiled as a "grey" tint instead.

    Most likely my camera settings, but I have lost the book on the possibilities of service to improve the quality of the photo - and the small icons in the settings don't really brings me a lot.  (Canon IXUS 8015)

    in any case, wanting to know if there is a way in Fireworks to get more white than gray background?  I've tried a few things (curves, levels), but nothing I tried helped.  I'll take some pictures - but just in case the same thing happens again, I want to be in a position of "correct" if possible.

    Pics here: http://www.Flickr.com/photos/perrelink/sets/72157622609437964/

    Any advice would be really appreciated.

    Nadia,

    I played a bit with one of the photos just to see what I could do. Here is what I cam to the top with - the attachment is a Fireworks PNG source, you can open in FW and see what I've done.

    There are three variations of the same image:

    (1) the original photo

    (2) adjusted with living filters and blend modes

    (3) hidden with mixture of modes and the saturation of the increase

    Hope this helps,

    Dave

    This is a JPEG file - PNG is in the queue, and that can take some time...

  • ADF business components: how to apply where Clause to the new lines

    Hello world.
    I develop Web Application from merger under Jdeveloper 11.1.1.0.1.
    I read this post http://blogs.oracle.com/jheadstart/rowmatch/
    And I have a question. How should I configure rowmatch if I instance the same viewobject except 2 2 viewobject defined on the same entity.

    If you use view criteria to make your filtering and scoring mode 'filter' of the Victoria Cross to be "Both" (database and in-memory), then the framework will automatically use your filter to filter the lines again without having to write code or use your own rowMatch object.

  • ACS 5.1 - command line filters does not not in Config Mode

    Hello

    I am trying to set up filters to deny command line sniffer commands being entered. I have set up a command set and applied to an authorization policy. The command filter works great for commands in privileged mode. However, the filter does not work for any order that is entered in configuration mode.

    I have a set of commands that will deny for a test installation:

    display the clock

    terminal length

    display monitor

    duration of the distance

    the monitor session

    The first three commands are entered from the initial mode of privilege and they are omitted by the AEC. The last two commands can be entered in config mode and the ACS does not stop their entry.

    I have attached two screenshots that show configuration commands on GBA game and a Terminal session which commands are filtered and which are rented by the intermediary.

    Has anyone encountered this problem? Is there something else I should be adding to the command Set? Is this a bug?

    There is a bug on the Cisco site that relates to the command filters:

    http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtf08567

    I don't know if this bug applies to this question because there is so little information on this subject. In addition, if it does not I don't understand workaround to apply it to this situation.

    Any advice would be greatly appreciated. -(ACS Version 5.1.0.44.2)

    Dave was soon

    You have authorization for the configuration on the router mode?

    If this isn't the case, add:

    AAA authorization config-commands

  • Filters for Adobe Photoshop greyed out in CMYK mode, why?

    In CMYK mode filters Gallery mode does not work in Adobe Photoshop CS6, can you please tell me what is the correct reason?

    Hi mahalakshmi.gg83470284

    Greetings.

    • Some operations only work in specific color patterns or bit depths. A lot of filters, including the Gallery of filters, does not work in CMYK mode.
    • As a general rule, any treatment in Photoshop works better with fidelity of color in RGB. CMYK conversion should be done as a last step after another editing and changes have been made.

    Concerning

    Rohit

Maybe you are looking for