Firefox asks me if I would record the same file repeatedly

Firefox repeatedly asks me if I want to save the same file. I delete the downloads.sqlite file. I disabled "don't forget the download history. I've upgraded Firefox 7 to 8 Firefox. Still having the same problem. I did uninstall and reinstall Firefox. I deleted the file from my computer. I still have the same problem. Problem only when Firefox is running.

I am running Windows Vista Home Premium with Service pack 2 (32 bit).

Suggestions how warns we stop/small window pop up that says "you have chosen to open...". You want to save this file?

Problem seems to be related to the use of speed dial add-on for FF. Some of the documents stored in the speed dial repeatedly ask you to record files/programs.

Tags: Firefox

Similar Questions

  • I get the same files repeat KB and how to stop it?

    I get the same files repeat KB and how to stop it?

    The KB record number are KB2478663 and KB2518870.

    Mike

    http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_vista-windows_update/how-to-stop-the-KB-file-from-keeping-repeating-to/21fb21b2-9a13-4261-9c1a-e7ef90a9e6a0

  • Firefox keeps asking if I want to record the same passwords if I continue to unchecking the checkbox of password to remember

    I use the latest version

    Start Firefox in Firefox to solve the issues in Safe Mode to check if one of the extensions of the origin of the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > appearance/themes).

  • Windows Update downloads and reinstalls the same files repeatedly.

    Updated Windows repeatedly downloads and reinstall the two Microsoft .NET Framework 4 for Windows Vista (KB2478663 and 2518870 KB) security updates.  They each have "successfully" installed over 25 times in recent weeks.  How can I make sure them and how to remove repeated facilities?  Thank you.

    Hello

    I suggest you to try the steps in the following Microsoft article and check if this may help.

    How to troubleshoot Windows Update or Microsoft Update when you are offered several times an update: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/910339

    I hope that helps!

  • Same html file seen locally on the laptop seems different from the same file uploaded to the server why?

    I create a file local html with CSS style sheets, etc. I see locally and he looks at the way in which it is intended, when I download and see from a domain to a server, same look of bigger files. This includes images, fonts, etc.. I even tried to reset firefox without result, but since it's the same file, I am just posting locally and online, there should be no reason for these differences. OS is Vista Home Premium, Mozilla Firefox 3.6.13.

    Reset the page zoom on pages that cause problems: view > Zoom > reset (Ctrl + 0 (zero); Cmd + 0 on Mac)

  • Problems with latency of Photoshop? When recording... 1.5 min to open 5.5 min to save the same file.

    I'm fighting to optimize my computer for Photoshop.

    An example of file opens in 85 seconds. Same file records in 340 seconds.

    PhotoShop CS6 (13.0.1)

    File is 21000 21000-50 layers (5.8 GB saved .psb) x

    Why so big? -5k.com/C.jpg

    When I open the image, I see 2 swap files 67 gb & 8.5 GB

    Hard drives

    C: Samsung 830 256 ssd boot drive.

    Samsung SSD RAID0 840Pro 256 x 2 (512total) PSswap/temp (Tests @1100 read mb/s @880 mb/sec write) (intel Z77 RST v11.0 + raid0 trim)

    Media for the 830 Samsung ssd drive (open and save)

    File opens in 90 seconds. Records in 340 seconds.

    remains at 0% recorded for 270 seconds

    INTEL I7 3770 K 3.5 G 8 M R8 - CPU utilization - about 12% + - global - no one over 50% CPU

    ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 lga 1155 MoBo

    32 gb MEM GSKILL F3 - 1866C10Q - 32GXL R 8Gx4

    variables:

    I tried video card (SD, int, basic) without change.

    Played with a NVIDIA QUADRO 6000 PCI - E 6 GB - did not see performance change.

    I tried some opening & registration on SSD raid0 without change.

    Dial-up PSswap & media readers - on open & close idle + - 100 sec.

    I do not understand why it would take much more time to save open...

    A better card (4 GB or 6 GB) video make a difference?

    64 GB RAM (dif mobo) or 6 core i7 - 39 * 0 K CPU would make a difference?

    Independent - when I pan at the bottom right of the image there is a mismatch in the display. Maximum of 20 s, regardless of the video settings.

    Is there an easy way to calculate the needs of video ram based on the size of the image? Prefer the ATI - wanted to try v9800 4 GB.

    Tried NVIDIA QUADRO 6000 6 PCI-E GB-looks no better.

    I remember reading that with SSDS, having separated for OS, TMP, CD readers is more adventageous... True or false?

    I'm grabbing at straws to figure out what that are my bottlenecks and how to eliminate the.

    Thanks in advance for any suggestions or advice.

    SysInfo

    Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.0.1 (13.0.1 20120808.r.519 2012/08 / 08:21:00:00) x 64

    Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit

    Version: 6.1 Service Pack 1

    System architecture: Intel CPU Family: 6, model: 10, Stepping: 9 with MMX, entire SSE, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, HyperThreading FP

    Physical processor count: 4

    Number of logical processors: 8

    Processor speed: 3510 MHz

    Built-in memory: 32723 MB

    Free memory: 5709 MB

    Memory available to Photoshop: 29745 MB

    Memory used by Photoshop: 84%

    Tile image size: 128K

    Image cache level: 4

    OpenGL drawing: enabled.

    OpenGL drawing mode: basic

    OpenGL allows Normal Mode: true.

    OpenGL allows Advanced Mode: true.

    OpenGL allows old GPU: not detected.

    The video card vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.

    Renderer video card: ATI over-pants V8800 (FireGL)

    Display: 2

    View the limits: = top: 0, left: 0, bottom: 1600, right: 2560

    Display: 1

    View the limits: = top: left 0,:-2560, downstairs: 1600, right: 0

    Video card: 1

    Graphics card: ATI over-pants V8800 (FireGL)

    OpenCL unavailable

    Driver version: 8.911.3.3000

    Driver date: 20120309000000.000000 - 000

    Video card driver:

    aticfx64.dll, aticfx64.dll, aticfx64.dll, aticfx32, aticfx32, aticfx32, atiumd64.dll, atidxx64.dl l, atidxx64.dll, atiumdag, atidxx32, atidxx32, atiumdva, atiumd6a.cap, atitmm64.dll

    Video mode: 2560 x 1600 x 4294967296 colors

    Legend of the video card: ATI over-pants V8800 (FireGL)

    Memory: 2048 MB

    Texture size video Rect: 16384

    Serial number: 90148609589462100194

    The application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64-bit).

    Temporary file path: C:\Users\Ivy1\AppData\Local\Temp\

    Zero Photoshop has async I/O active

    Scratch the volumes:

    E:\, 238.5 G, 154.4 free G

    Required plugins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit) \Required\

    Main Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit) \Plug-ins\

    Additional Plug-ins folder: not defined

    (shortcut)

    Plug-ins option and the third: NONE

    Plug-ins that could not load: NONE

    Flash:

    Mini Bridge

    Kuler

    Install TWAIN devices: NONE

    I'm fighting to optimize my computer for Photoshop.

    This sample file opens in 85 seconds. Same file records in 340 seconds.

    PhotoShop CS6 (13.0.1)

    File is 21000 21000-50 layers (5.8 GB saved .psb) x

    Why so big? -5k.com/C.jpg

    Open picture, I see 2 swap files 67 gb & 8.5 GB

    Hard drives

    c: Samsung 830 256 ssd boot drive.

    Samsung SSD RAID0 840Pro 256 x 2 (512total) PSswap/temp (Tests @1100 read mb/s @880 mb/sec write) (intel Z77 RST v11.0 + raid0 trim)

    Media for the 830 Samsung ssd drive (open and save)

    File opens in 90 seconds. Records in 340 seconds.

    remains at 0% recorded for 270 seconds

    INTEL I7 3770 K 3.5 G 8 M R8 - CPU utilization - about 12% + - global - no one over 50% CPU

    ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 lga 1155 MoBo

    MEM 8Gx4. GSKILL F3-1866C10Q-32GXL R

    variables:

    I tried video card (SD, int, basic) without change.

    Played with a NVIDIA QUADRO 6000 PCI - E 6 GB - did not see performance change.

    I tried some opening & registration on SSD raid0 without change.

    Dial-up PSswap & media readers - on open & close idle + - 100 sec.

    I do not understand why it would take much more time to save open...

    A better card (4 GB or 6 GB) video make a difference?

    64 GB RAM (dif mobo) or 6 core i7 - 39 * 0 K CPU would make a difference?

    When I pan at the bottom right of the image there is a mismatch in the display. Maximum of 20 s, regardless of the video settings.

    Is there an easy way to calculate the needs of video ram based on the size of the image? Prefer the ATI - wanted to try v9800 4 GB.

    I remember reading that with SSDS, having separated for OS, TMP, CD readers is more adventageous... True or false?

    I'm grabbing at straws to figure out what that are my bottlenecks and how to eliminate the.

    SysInfo

    Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.0.1 (13.0.1 20120808.r.519 2012/08 / 08:21:00:00) x 64

    Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit

    Version: 6.1 Service Pack 1

    System architecture: Intel CPU Family: 6, model: 10, Stepping: 9 with MMX, entire SSE, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, HyperThreading FP

    Physical processor count: 4

    Number of logical processors: 8

    Processor speed: 3510 MHz

    Built-in memory: 32723 MB

    Free memory: 5709 MB

    Memory available to Photoshop: 29745 MB

    Memory used by Photoshop: 84%

    Tile image size: 128K

    Image cache level: 4

    OpenGL drawing: enabled.

    OpenGL drawing mode: basic

    OpenGL allows Normal Mode: true.

    OpenGL allows Advanced Mode: true.

    OpenGL allows old GPU: not detected.

    The video card vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.

    Renderer video card: ATI over-pants V8800 (FireGL)

    Display: 2

    View the limits: = top: 0, left: 0, bottom: 1600, right: 2560

    Display: 1

    View the limits: = top: left 0,:-2560, downstairs: 1600, right: 0

    Video card: 1

    Graphics card: ATI over-pants V8800 (FireGL)

    OpenCL unavailable

    Driver version: 8.911.3.3000

    Driver date: 20120309000000.000000 - 000

    Video card driver:

    aticfx64.dll, aticfx64.dll, aticfx64.dll, aticfx32, aticfx32, aticfx32, atiumd64.dll, atidxx64.dl l, atidxx64.dll, atiumdag, atidxx32, atidxx32, atiumdva, atiumd6a.cap, atitmm64.dll

    Video mode: 2560 x 1600 x 4294967296 colors

    Legend of the video card: ATI over-pants V8800 (FireGL)

    Memory: 2048 MB

    Texture size video Rect: 16384

    Serial number: 90148609589462100194

    The application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64-bit).

    Temporary file path: C:\Users\Ivy1\AppData\Local\Temp\

    Zero Photoshop has async I/O active

    Scratch the volumes:

    E:\, 238.5 G, 154.4 free G

    Required plugins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit) \Required\

    Main Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit) \Plug-ins\

    Additional Plug-ins folder: not defined

    (shortcut)

    Plug-ins option and the third: NONE

    Plug-ins that could not load: NONE

    Flash:

    Mini Bridge

    Kuler

    Install TWAIN devices: NONE

    Post edited by: PECourtejoie

    Noel,.

    I can't thank you enough for this screenshot of your settings.

    It was the "preview image" that cost me all the extra gain time.

    I've changed that 'Never save' and the same file saves in 62 seconds.

    Curiously, this setting also reduces the time to open the file of 25% (65sec.).

    Because not even Photoshop seems to be able to display said preview image, no loss at all.

    It is ok! 40,000 x 40 000 picture - here come me!   HA

  • I want to change the location of Firefox 3.6.8 profiles so that the same profile can be used by different Win XP user accounts.

    I changed the storage location of the profiles for versions of Firefox prior to version 3.6.8 on other computers by changing profiles.ini to point to the modified location, using the same file successfully profiles.ini for different user accounts. When I upgraded to 3.6.8 on this machine dual-booting Win Xp and Win 7, modified profiles storage location has been maintained so that all users in the two operating systems use the same profile (and the same version of Firefox). I tried to use what I think, it's the same procedure in another Win XP machine, but when I try to open Firefox 3.6.8 installed on this computer, I get a message saying that Firefox is already running and I have to close to go forward.

    Please explain how I can get this to work.

    Thank you.

    You define the location of the profile profiles.ini file for XP and Windows 7 point to that same folder.

    Easier to accomplish this is to create a new profile and choose the location of this profile to point to the profile folder.

    Make sure you have write access in the two BONES in the profile folder.

    See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Recovering_a_missing_profile

  • How to record the numbers and words in the same file

    Hello:

    I did a vi where I record the spectrum and its integration in different positions of a two-dimensional net. I save the information in two spreadsheet with the comand "write to file measure."

    Now, I am recording the parameters initial positions, end X X and space between measurement points. I want a file with two columns that looks like:

    Initial position X 1000

    final position X 2000

    space 100

    But idon't know how to save the words and numbers in the same file.

    As I have to perform several steps I want to automatically choose the name of the file (something like parameters_1, parameters_2...)

    Thank you for your attention

    Hi bitxor.

    You can use all the functions of the WriteTotext file to write strings to a file.

    Then you could set up WriteToMeasurementFile' to add new data to existing files (instead of overwrite or renaming)...

    BTW. It is not a good idea to mix lvm files containing arbitrary spreadsheet data!

  • How can we prevent the Explorer of research according to the records of multiple copies of the same file?

    Several slightly different copies of the same file, but subfolders will appear in Windows 7 when you perform a global search for files with specific attributes (e.g., size, date, extension).  If you delete a file, you really are by deleting all the files reported.  What are the steps to perform a search and don't report the real file rather than multiple versions of shadow or shortcut of the file?

    Example:
    Research on all files on the C drive beyond 1 GB, I receive a report in which there are 4 files
    games_file. ISO 7,084,400,688 1/1/2011 12:00 am a C:\Documents and settings\COMPUTER\Documents\Stuff\Apps
    games_file. ISO 7,084,400,688 1/1/2011 12:00 am a C:\Documents and settings\COMPUTER\My Documents\Stuff\Apps
    games_file. ISO 7,084,400,688 1/1/2011 12:00 am by C:\Users\COMPUTER\Documents\Stuff\Apps
    games_file. ISO 7,084,400,688 1/1/2011 12:00 am has C:\Users\COMPUTER\My Documents\Stuff\Apps

    WOW - I can save 21 GB deleting 3 files, right?  Nope, it's all the same physical file.  It should be reported as such.

    Hello

    I suggest to check indexed locations and make sure that duplicate records are not explicitly added. If they do, delete or rebuild the search index and check if the problem is still there

    Change advanced indexing options

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/change-advanced-indexing-options

    If the problem persists, then create a new user account and verify.

    Create a user account

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/create-a-user-account

    Create a test file in the same location, and check if the same file is returned multiple times.

    If this isn't the case, then follow the steps mentioned in the link to transfer data from the old user account for the new user account.

    Difficulty of a corrupted user profile

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/fix-a-corrupted-user-profile

  • Can I organize pictures by year, then month, then the location. In the photo on my iPhone app, they are organized in this way and I would do the same in Lightroom. Is this possible?

    Can I organize pictures by year, then month, then the location. In the photo on my iPhone app, they are organized in this way and I would do the same in Lightroom. Is this possible?

    Find pictures of calendar is integrated into Lightroom. The filter bar allows you to find photos taken during the year, or any month/year or month/day/year. No work necessary to implement. Just use the filter bar.

    Location is also a means of organizing in Lightroom and is especially easy if your phone adds GPS coordinates to the pictures it takes. Even if the phone does not add the GPS location, you can do it manually in Lightroom.

  • When you use the batch, record with the same file name in the same folder.

    I therefore about 500 pictures that needs to be cropped. I created the cropaction and added a "backup" function and close in action, because I want the photos to be saved with the same file name in the same folder...

    Now I want that it take its course. But no, I have to press ok to confirm the backup on each photo.

    Someone knows how to fix this?

    BR

    Robert

    I solved it.

    I forgot to check the box "override save under ' :)

  • create dvd Windows burned a disc once but won't burn the same files again

    I used the windows dvd creation (windows 7) and burned a video. I tried to burn the same video using the same files. It started the burn and went up to 99% and then I got an error message that it could not burn the video. I tried several disks and got the same answer every time. I put the burning speed to slow, always the same results. The error of the message box was a link to click on, and he said that he has no help for this topic in this version of windows.

    I used the windows dvd creation (windows 7) and burned a video. I tried to burn the same video using the same files. It started the burn and went up to 99% and then I got an error message that it could not burn the video. I tried several disks and got the same answer every time. I put the burning speed to slow, always the same results. The error of the message box was a link to click on, and he said that he has no help for this topic in this version of windows.

    =========================================
    Might be interesting to try to disable all filters as described
    in the following article.

    How to burn DVDs with Windows DVD Maker
    http://www.7tutorials.com/how-burn-DVDs-Windows-DVD-Maker
    (scroll waaay down for...) What to do in case of problems)

    Personally, I think would be best to use the followig
    freware to create an ISO of your DVD file already successful
    and then burn as many copies as you want using the ISO file.
    This way the files do not have to be re-encoded with each engraving.

    FWIW... it's always a good idea to create a system
    Restore point before installing software or updates)

    Click left on the green circle with the white arrow... it is said
    «Click here to download»

    Download ImgBurn:
    http://www.Digital-Digest.com/software/download.php?sid=470&SSID=0&did=1
    (The download is: SetupImgBurn_2.5.7.0.exe)

    (During the installation there will be an option to install
    Shortcuts of UniBlue and the "Ask Toolbar"... you can
    you want to deselect those)

    The following tutorials may be worth a visit:

    How to create an image file of a disc with ImgBurn
    http://Forum.ImgBurn.com/index.php?showtopic=6379

    How to write an image file to a disc with ImgBurn
    http://Forum.ImgBurn.com/index.php?showtopic=61

    Good luck...

  • Economy twice during an action as the same file extension possible with Photoshop without overwriting the first backup?

    Hello, first time submit a question to the Adobe communities.

    I would like to be able to record twice during an action with the same file extension; How is that possible? I tried a number of methods such as: save a JPEG as a copy, renaming jpeg in jpg format, adding a line to underscore the SMALL Word after it, etc., and it keeps overwriting my first recording. I'm still not recording "in copy" feature when saving a jpeg file. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. I think that if this box is not grayed out on my second record I would be able to add the copy at the end of my file name that would create my second jpeg.

    I need this is because when I save the little and the big jpeg for our company store, I would just create an action that saves as two different sizes and then closes the file to move to another. The site on what I download is Four51 and they take a reorganization of the files, so a single method, I tried was to save the second time into action as a png but it makes it transparent and I need a white Uni.

    Tried to go into the options and disabling transparency PNG but that only works with quick export that will not register within an action (even abroad). It is a dilemma for some time, and my only way to work around it is to create the action doesn't follow: resize to 300 px wide > save as Jpeg > end of action. I play action and hit the command option I have change my size to 100 px wide for the thumbnail, then click on control shift s to record success and right arrow to add details and then save, order q, tab, space.

    If it makes no sense to anyone, I would be grateful for your advice. The only thing I can think that I have not tried is to change my background from transparent to white and then create this action: command option I have 300 px wide > order s (jpeg) > command option I have 100 px wide > command shift s (png) > w command

    I guess the only way to change your default background to white instead of transparent is to create a new document and put in place without transparent background then go further, my new documents will have white backgrounds. Do not see under my preferences?

    Thank you

    Something like the following action could work.

    A couple of notes:

    Image adjustment is under file > Automate > Fit Image and resizes the image to fit the specified size.

    For example, if you enter 300 in the two fields, photoshop resizes the longer side at 300 and the other dimension including the size proportionally as when you use Image > Image size to maintain Proportions checked.

    Photoshop uses the copy to JPEG files if the image of your savings has one or more layers or is not 8-bit/channel, because do not support JPEGs of layers or say 16 bits/channel.

    If you have only a background layer, then photoshop uses a copy when saving a jpeg file

    Thus, during the recording of the action you probably want that one-step flatten so save the first does not include copy in the name.

    To get the action record adding copy to name, open any image, add a layer, and then record save as jpeg for copy adds the jpeg save as step

    Created the snapshot of the original image open, so the second resizing using the original instead of resizing the image already resized.

  • Make my MXF project format MXF spews on more than 25 copies of the same file: different sizes?

    When making my MXF project format MXF spews on a ton of makes MXF the same file: different sizes?

    The reason I want to make an another MXF is in the first place, because when I go directly to the project with all the various effects, Magic Bullet Looks, etc, etc.

    in another format, there are always problems.

    Therefore, I have not choice but to descend a generation to gather footage and made an exact copy of what is in the project to the MXF format before I make an MPEG or a H.264.

    The size of my project is more than 100 GB...

    In any case, my most likely choice is to go with the file with most gigabytes. As I say... He spits the different sizes.

    Is there a way to stop the rendering to spit on a ton of MXF files and streamline all in MXF format?

    I searched and searched the Internet for the answer and have checked the forums without success.

    The other thing that concerns me is that a project of more than 100 gigabytes becomes a 3.4 GB file to a 97-minute film. (It also makes a MXF to 1.5 Gig size. Everything is exactly the same thing on this record as far as I know, the rendering of Gigabyte 3.4) that she return 25 to 3.4 GB MXF files. (It's also take up a ton of space on my drive hard whenever I visit)

    It doesn't seem wise because when I visited about 8 minutes from the beginning of the film, he made a 2.9 Gigabyte file contrast with Gigbyte 3.4 file for the entire film.

    Somehow, I think that I can get the same quality when rendering the entire production.

    In addition, it takes more than 5 hours to make a MXF and I feel if it was just on 1 file, such as difference in more than 25 of the exact same rendering MXF files, rendering time would be faster and more efficient.

    Any help or explanations would be appreciated...

    Thank you

    James

    P.S. I deleted a whole bunch of MXF files to make, believeing that they were all duplicates. Of course, they were not, because the one I saved, I put in first to check and it displays only one segment of the film. Therefore, I think that all of the MXF should be connected and when you transfer one in, full MXF is displayed, however... If you delete everything except a MXF thought they are all duplicates, you only this segment of production. Seems to work quite the way to crazy? lol that sounds too wise in what concerns the gigabytes. However, first give the properties for that 1 file that you are importing, even if it is connected to all the other files. Projects likely to be total MXF gigabytes. Because I deleted all the files except one, I'm re - make everything. I'll let him place in case someone else runs into the same situation, I am sure someone will... lol

    the effects were interfering with a good record.

    It's probably not the right explanation.  Many export (which is different a rendering, take note of that) their projects directly from the sequence, effects and everything and get perfectly workable results.  In fact, I would say more that everybody does things like that.  I use MB effects for years, and yes it's hard reading.  But export always out just fine even on my system of $800.

    While your exports come out wobbly, it would probably be to fix it the problem to be solved.  But I would probably start looking for somewhere other than the effects.  Only those should not create the issue you described.

  • Write a string and an integer and a table all in the same file?

    Hello

    I am currently it several different types of values with LabView.

    I have a shot, a few numbers and several paintings.

    Thus, for example, I have a timestamp of the chain, several values of "integer" amplitude of the signal for example, RMS value, frequency and I have several paintings - table of signal, the FFT (PIC and location) values.

    Basically, I'm trying to find a way to write all the values in a single file. I can write all the individual types to separate files (so I can write the RMS, amplitude and frequency to a single file, some of the tables in the other)
    but is it possible to write a string and an integer and a table all in the same file?

    Pointers would be much appreciated,

    Thank you

    Paula

    Your file will be all text... any format in a table of text, to build as a single table, "table chain worksheet", to write to the file.

    (I'm sure this has been on the forums before... a search it would have thrown upward)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Web Application Manager

    I'm trying to view my cameras remotely online security. Previously, he worked with IE8, but not with Firefox or IE9. Is there an extension or a plugin as a work-around?

  • How to install pluings flash in firefox os browser?

    I try to visit this page http://www.jimnyclub.com/ and Firefox OS browser does not have flash installed. I'm trying to find how to install flash but I can't Born how.

  • Copy the file of the cRIO via ftp

    Hello I tried to copy a file of cRIO on my computer using the FTP get file.vi but received the error 56. The 56 error appears to be a timeout error, but I am able to access the cRIO normally the PC using FTP. I just follow the link below http://digit

  • Pavilion Slimline 400: Installation problem

    I tried in vain to install my old Bejeweled game on my brand new HP Pavilion Slimline 400 office.  No matter how many times I clicked on the Install of the game on my screen button, nothing happened.  Oddly, I had no problem installing the same game

  • The games are too small

    ahki,We need more specific information on this issue.  Please see the sticky note at the beginning of the forum with the necessary information and after return. What to post in the forum gamesMike - Engineer Support Microsoft AnswersVisit our Microso