G7X Canon Lens correction

Similar Questions

• Canon powershot G15 lens correction profile 4.4 lightroom

  No matter who builds a profile of lens for canon powershot g15 correction?  I am new to lightroom and can not see this camera on the lens correction list, although my pentax DSLR is here.  any help gratefully appreciated - I am very new to lightroom so that the silly language of evidence any help greatly appreciated.

  Yes redkaz,

  If you go to the main lightroom forum page, on the right side, there is a section of resources.

  

  Press 'submit a feature request or bug '. Here, you can submit a feature request and vote for others.

  Please let me know if you have any other questions,

  Janelle

• Profiles of lenses of Photoshop CS6 No. (lens correction filter) for Canon 6 d raw files

  LightRoom and Camera Raw have Lens Correction profiles and all lenses available today are in the list for the Canon 6 d of the raw files. BUT the Correction of filter/optics if Photoshop CS6 only have 2 Tamron lenses listed. Weird that there are a of the profiles of lenses for the Canon 6 d raw files in Lightroom and Camera RAW, but not CS6 filter/Lens Correction.

  Camera RAW, LR and PS are up-to-date... NOTE: I have a Canon G11, 7 d and 1 d Mark II N and all their files work as expected. It's only the RAW files created by Canon 6 d.

  All of the suggestions.

  To the right of where it says the search criteria, click on the small icon of three bars-arrow and uncheck the Match sensor size and should learn more.

• Canon lens EF 70-200mm L F4 USM + 2 X L series extender

  Hi, I have a Canon lens EF 70-200mm L F4 USM. Now, I want to buy an extension of series X L 2. Can someone help me by informing that AF can work with EF 70-200mm L USM F4 + 2 X Extender mounted on 650 d device and how much image quality I have to make compromises for the same thing.

  mithun_pal129 wrote:

  Thank you all for your valuable comments. I forgot to mention that my intension of extender to my EF 70-200mm L F4 USM in a telephoto lens for wildlife / birds. But now that I'm your stay in Abu Dhabi, he is not paid a lot of bird / wild life. This is why I don't want to spend a lot on super telephoto, and personally, I don't want to go to cheap Sigma lens. So I wanted to do objective 70-200mm + 2 Expander x 140-400 mm. As I myself feel 1.4 X extender is pretty good, but it will give me up to 280mm. I know that's not very good lens for bird / wild raise photography. But you want to know still is feasible or if I use 2 x Extender to make the 400mm autofocus lens is required for the wild life or manual focus can still operate at F8. I don't have a lot of experience in the photography of wild life that's why I wanted to know things.

  In a Word... N °

  Of a 2 X teleconverter on a 70-200/4 made for a lens of 140-400/8 "effective." Due to the reduction of light reaching the AF sensors, your camera will turn off autofocus. A stronger 2 X also "costs" more loss of quality of the image due to the deterioration.

  It is possible to tape on some of the electronic contacts on the focal length multiplier, so that the camera does not know it is there and always try to auto focus. However, the autofocus will be much slower and will tend to hunt much more.

  In some situations, you may be able to manually update. However, effective f8 makes for a pretty weak sight, most cameras update automatic modern as you do not have some fo the features allowing the development manual, vintage cameras designed for the manual focus had in the past. Some people change to one-third of frosted glass to add functionality to support manual focus (split finder image, micro diaprisms, for example). However this requires careful work to install the screen and the display of different can affect precision measurement of the camera, especially in the incorrect Spot metering.

  Addition of a lower 1.4 X teleconverter makes your lens in effect 112-280mm f5.6, who will still be updated with auto focus and will be much less loss of image quality, but not as much 'reach. If yours is a goal IS, it can reasonably be handholdable. If it is not a goal IS, you will need to watch your shutter speeds than blur carefully, probably should keep to 1/500 or more quickly to avoid the camera. Or use a tripod, as suggested by ebibgs, or at least a monopod. You also need to limit the autofocus on your camera to the central AF point only, I think.

  ebiggs1 wrote:

  On your camera, the 70-200mm f4 is like a 112-320mm f4.  With a converter 1. 4 x, looking at 448mm f5.6 and th elong end.  + 400 mm should be long enough for you to get photos of some birds.  BTW, use a tripod.

  While it is technically correct, citing the "crop camera lens factor" in this way may not help much, can be confusing.

  The original poster has simply a 70-200mm lens which they are accustomed to using on a crop sensor camera. They would now like to double the range of this lens on their camera. Crop sensor lens incorporating conversation factor is very useful when the user goes from frame of film/full to reframe the camera or vice versa. For someone who has never used a film camera or has not used one for many years and is now completely accustomed to how behaves a lens of focal length on their device to harvest, it is a completely moot point.

  But what he's basically saying that while you can add a 2 X, it is probably not a good idea for several reasons. Auto focus will work or not, with a few tips, won't work only weakly. Manual focus will be difficult. And the picture quality might take too big a hit, combining a 2 X with your goal. .

  I have a 70-200/4 IS, 70-200/2.8 IS ("Mark I"), 1. 4 X II and 2 X Teleconverters II. I also have long telephoto lenses, so rarely need to add these zooms teleconverter. However if necessary I would use 1.4 X on one of them. But even if AF still work on the 70-200/2.8 + 2 X combo, I won't use it because of the amount of loss of image quality (the most recent IS of 70 - 200/2.8 Mark II and 2 X Mark III are supposed to work together better, than my older versions of each).

  I use mostly 2 X on 300/2.8 and 500/4 lenses privileged where the image quality is still good. (Note: Yes, on some of my cameras 2 X 500/4 causes AF to stop working, as it would on your f4 lens, so I only use the combo on a limited basis.)

  mithun_pal129... I would say the more you get a 1. 4 X and use it with your goal. See if the image quality is to your expectations. Then work to get closer to your subjects. Or bring them closer to you. Practice the techniques of stalking and to study the behaviors of your subjects to discover ways to get closer. Work in a blind and use bait (food, calls). And start saving for a lens of longer focal length.

  The Canon 1.4 X II and III teleconverters are excellent. All Canon teleconverters have mated before elements that limit the lenses that they physically can be attached, but the 70-200 are among those where this is possible. Teleconverter Kenko is another that I see quite often recommended. They have two different levels of quality: a more expensive "Pro 300" version and a cheaper "MC - 4". These are currently offered in versions "DGX" whose operation is very similar to Canon teleconverters. Old Kenko teleconverters "DG" not "reported" to the camera, the camera didn't know they were there, so try to focus.  In the view of users and tests I've seen, the current Kenko Pro 300 DGX is pretty good overall of the entire image area. The MC - 4 cheaper is actually a little sharper in the Center, but not as strong in the corners and the edges of the image. Tamron and Sigma teleconverters also do, but I have little experience or knowledge of the current versions of the people.

  The wildlife/bird photography is not easy. Since no matter how long a goal that you have, there are times when the subjects are just out of reach and all you can go is to sit back and enjoy the show.

  These photos of small subjects with different, but close to or less than the effective focal length even lenses like your 70-200 mm + a 1. 4 X teleconverter would be on your camera...

  

  

  

  

  ***********
  Alan Myers

  San Jose, California, USA.
  «Market softly and carry a great lens.»
  MATERIAL: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
  FLICKR & REPROGRAPHY

• I see my profile file of Sigma lenses in the Lr5.7.1 folder - but I can't select it in the drop of Lens Correction

  Hello

  I see my exact Sigma lens profile in my Lr 5.7.1 record (SIGMA 150-600 mm F5-6. 3 DG OS HSM C015)-RAW.lcp)- but it's as an option in the dropdown of my Module development lens Corrections unselectable.

  I see it in C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\Sigma\Canon

  Sigma Sport version is just next to it in the folder - and it's the only one I can see and select, its name is the same direction except the last part of names p014

  How can I make MY selectable lens in the drop-down list?

  Thank you

  OK - I thought about it!

  I stuck the lens profile to:

  C:\Users\XXXX\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0

  no other profiles were in it - but after pasting the profile here - he appeared in Lr... YAYY

• Lens correction profiles

  Hi gentlemen,

  I work with Adobe Camera Raw 8.7.1 on Mac OS Yosemite.

  When I try to use the automatic lens correction, the program cannot load profiles.

  I see a lot of profiles in the list of cameras and lenses, but when I click on the profiles, some profiles fuctions and others not.

  I have two cameras, Fuji x 100 and canon 5dii with 24-105.

  I have never had any problem with lens correction, but now it does not work well. I tried to install the latest adobe Dng converter to update the profiles of the lens, but it does not work well.

  If I choose other profiles, some profiles works well, I do not understand why...

  can you help me, please?

  Thank you

  Well, try reset again. Here are the videos that should help you:

  Benjamin

• I have to use the lens correction in lightroom 5 if I activated behind closed doors?

  Do I have to use the lens correction in Lightroom 5 develop module there I activated behind closed doors? (Canon 5 3)

  Your camera (if on) lens correction in JPEG format, will not apply for RAW files. Clearly, you don't want to apply twice.

  John

• Possible to specify no lens correction for some lenses

  Hello.  It is possible to specify no lens correction for some lenses (such as fisheye) while using 'default' or 'auto' for the correction of the goal?  If there is no built-in feature to support this, it would be possible to change manually the profiles included for the specific lens to achieve the same effect?  In addition, the profiles included location?  Thank you.

  You can set the "default settings" for each objective separately.

  Lightroom 4

  1 Select an image taken with the lens, 2) go to "correction lenses and sele ctthe tab ' profile»(, 3) set"Distotion"both vignetting" to "0" and 4) click on the arrows next to "Setup" and select "Save new lens profile by default."

  Lightroom 3

  Same as above, but also the value "Aberration C." '0' If you want.

  For most of my lenses I 0 ' distortion' and 'Vignetting' 50 and change it only on images that seem to need it. That's just my preference, yours may differ. For my Canon 8-15mm I sometimes use distortion "control if I'm changing the 'fisheye look'. I generally use PS Adaptive Filter of wide angle and Fisheye-Hemi plugin for this purpose.

• Is it possible to use automatic lens correction profiles in Camera RAW using Extendscript?

  I developed some Javascripts use Extendscript toolkit to help me process batches of files to create videos of time, and

  I would like to take advantage of the automatic lens correction profiles available in Adobe Camera RAW (I use Adobe Photoshop CS6 64-bit), but in the CameraRAWOpenOptions, there is no property describing automatic lens correction profiles.  It seems that there must be a way to automate the selection of the checkbox "Activate the profile of lens Corrections" at the opening of RAW images from the camera.  I use Canon lenses and large Adobe lens correction profiles work, so I want to use them.

  I am aware of the other way to do this Photoshop using file-> automate-> Correction of the lens, but it seems to work more slowly than to use the lens correction in Camera RAW.

  Thank you.

  You don't need to bother... just set your camera Raw "Defaults" to include allow Corrections lenses profile and check the Auto CA correction. Then go to the ACR contextual menu and choose Save new Camera Raw default... Note: If you have your ACR preferences to have separate by default based on the serial number of camera and ISO, you will need to save by default, separate for each camera and ISO values you use.

• After hdr pro, LR does not have lens correction correct.

  When I take pictures with my Canon ESF objective USM 15-85, LR4 acknowledges the lens and will be automatically correct. However, if I take several pictures with this lens, open to LR4 and transfer to CS5 hdr pro, when I transfer to LR4, LR4 does not list this lens as an option for the correction of the goal. I can the corrrect product hdr lens in CS5 before transfer back to LR. Which is the best solution, or I do something wrong in LR4? Should I lens correct each frame in LR4 before transfereing CS5 HDR Pro? Moreover, I had the same problem with LR3.

  DT

  The goal is not listed because you reimport a file (TIFF or PSD not RAW) which could have originated or been rendered with the incorrect correction.  Another example of this is that the choice of lens correction differ between CR2 and JPEG.

  I apply lens correction to HDR and panoramas before editing in CS5, but try to minimize other develop to ensure the consistency of the handover.  A relevant light bracket with panoramas, which might not be relevant to you and certainly are pedantic, strict accuracy try to avoid adjustments that are Adaptive image (in black LR4, white, highlight, shadow) to develop before yielding to the CS5 because the strength of the adjustment varies with the content of the image. that is the same setting of the cursor has a different effect in an image of sky dominated than on a dominated shadow image light.

• Support for profile lens corrections are not not in Lightroom 3.2

  I installed the Lightroom 3.2 update, which includes the list of support for the 'Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II' lens.  I pulled a number of pictures with this lens (using a Canon T1i) and load them into Lightroom.  In the metadata for the photos, the lens was called "EF50mm f/1.8 II.

  Within the "Lens Corrections" section of Lightroom, the option 'Auto' reports "Could not find a profile matching automatically."  I tried manually to the list of Canon lenses, and it is not on the list.

  In the folder
  / Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/LensProfiles/1.0/Canon/
  I see a file corresponding to this objective
  Canon EOS 5 d Mark II (Canon EF 50mm f1.8 II) - RAW.lcp
  but it is not with only one specific body.
  I tried to manually install the update to Camera Raw 6.2, but he noted "update is not applicable."  Given the above file, I suspect that it was already installed.
  In the release notes, which entered the Canon EF 50 mm f/1.8 II lens, it does not mention that the support was limited to only a certain camera body.  Could someone help me please?  Thank you!

  http://forums.Adobe.com/message/3105679#3105679

• LR3 lens correction parameters

  Hi guys! I downloaded LR3 yesterday and played with the trial version for a few hours now. It looks like a very welcome upgrade on version 2.x. However, I can't fully appreciate how lens correction module is supposed to work.

  I am a user of nikon with lens Tamron 28-75. After setting "custom" lens profile correction and choosing Tamron as lens manufacturer, LR3 precisely my lens model is proposed and assigns an existing adobe profile. So far so good. But there is one thing that keeps me from feeling all happy and excited by this new feature: Lightroom would not save the different defaults for different focal lengths. For example, the goal of tamron 28-75/2.8 named above has somewhat considerate Canon type distortion at 28mm, and at the same time to its maximum of 75mm geometry, distortions are almost non-existent. So although I am happy with how LR3 manages wide-angle distortions, it makes things a lot more wrong with telephoto lens when I apply the default lens corrections.

  Where the question: can I somehow make settings in the module changes specific to the used focal length lens? Of course, I wish that LR do this for me, but since he cannot, there is a walkaround? Tweaking the settings for each shot takes a long time, and I see no reason not to make this a little more automated process.

  They should be at 100 without worrying.

  Think of it this way. LR is focal length setting and applying corrections. It gives you a 100 as the starting point. This means that 100% of the correction is applied. Lower dial 100 and lower the correction is applied. He switched and he too made the distortion/CA/Vig.

  Think of it as a volume control for the profile being applied.

• Lens Correction Panel

  I work in Lightroom CC and all updates are completed. The Lens Correction Panel provides only options 'Manual' and 'Profile' -' base' and 'Color' is absent. In addition, the "Crop to compel" option is not available.

  Any suggestions to solve this?

  If you have Lightroom CC 2015.6 (or later version)-- do you use? -Look under the Transform Panel

• Lens Correction Panel has only 2 options

  This is all I get in Panel Correction lens - where is the Basic, profile, color options and manual.  It's CC Lightroom 2015.  I don't see where the other options are for the Panel. would appreciate help.  Thank you

  There is a new "Transform" Panel, in which some functions have been moved.

  "Lens Corrections" are now exclusively dealing with aberrations of goal and CA - either with a profile, or manual.

  'Transform' is where the adjustments from the point of view (which were never, strictly speaking, lens corrections in itself).

• The Photoshop lens correction crashing made video

  Hello.

  I did a video shoot of a marriage with a Go Pro camera. The video only fish expected eye view. So to convert the video to a smart object and apply a correction of the lens. When I try to make the video with the correction of the lens, I get a windows error saying that your system is low on memory and photoshop will crash. If I make the video with optical correction, it works normally.

  I suspect a leak memory in the lens correction in Photoshop part.

  When you work with the video you want to keep your number of encoding to a minimum, so I rather wouldn't it but GoPro Studio first just to remove fisheye. Any body have a work around for this?

  Thank you mike.

  I don't have a video.  If you really want to make the video and edit it well you should use applications video adobe first Pro and After effects. You know for sure, you have a problem with your great video with fisheye, you want defish.  If this is a bug in CS6 it will not be fixed.  DOE Adobe does not support older versions of their Applications.   I also think to make a video well the requirement of the machine would be very probably higher then the requirement of Photoshop.