Similar Questions

• removal of the front frame on my hp pavilion dv3-2155mx

  Hi, I hope I'm doing this right. I have a question about removing the front bezel on my hp pavilion dv3-2155mx. I can't find the screws. Help, please

  Hello:

  Have you read the service manual - section on the screen set (Chapter 4, starting on page 4-28)?

  http://h10032.www1.HP.com/CTG/manual/c01720761.PDF

  Paul

• Re: How to remove the front panel of the screen of the a500?

  Hey I have a broken in my satellite a500 screen.

  I ve already bought the new screen, but I have problem of take-off of the front frame: I unscrewed 4 screws of glasses everything is fine but I can't unlock the area around the hinge I know there is a pop lockers behind the hinge but even when I opened them I couldn't take off the bezel.

  Could someone help me? Thank you

  Hello

  It's pretty easy, dude :)

  www.irisvista.com/tech/laptops/Toshiba-Satellite-A505/removing-optical-drive-1.htm

  But be careful when removing

• Show/hide the façade

  Hello

  I have a labview code that has a MainVI and a Subvi. I need the front panel display/hide the Subvi.

  I have a business structure that has two cases,

  Case 1: I want to display the front panel

  Case 2: I want to hide the front panel.

  I am currently using the property node, but I can't attribute controls the display on the front panel

  Help, please

  It is property and not invoke the nodes. My bad!

• How to show or hide a control on the front

  Hi all, I review the code to someone else, and a control at the front panel seems to be hidden until click you on an item to display. I tried to use right click in front panel and it did not work by clicking something bound to show or hide. Since I did not quite familiar with property nodes, this hidden parameter can be linked to it.

  In the photo, it shows the façade and its two property nodes, could someone advise me how to change the setting to show this control? Thank you!

  

  Hey.

  Is that what you are looking for...

  

  The Visible property to set the option above by programming.  If you want it to, you need wire a real constant itself.

  Kind regards

• Help!  I'm stuck.  No, not the child into the well.  I took a picture and put a second layer top with a rounded rectangle to make a frame.  My problem is that I need to find a way to hide the small box outside the box on the second layer.  Thanks to

  Help!  I'm stuck.  No, not the child into the well.  I took a picture and put a second layer top with a rounded rectangle to make a frame.  My problem is that I need to find a way to hide the small box outside the box on the second layer.  Thanks to all those who can help you.

  

  Another option is to put the Options bar of the Rectangle rounded to the path tool

  Trash bolt for the background layer, hold down the Cmd key and click on the symbol of the new layer to layer below the image to white. Then edit > fill with white.

  Return the image layer and draw the image as a path

  Click the load as a selection path in the Panel traced

  Edit > stroke and stroke with color

  Select > Inverse > delete

• Hide columns in the front-end, i.e. the Oracle answers

  Hello
  
  I wonder if it is possible to hide the columns considered non-essential as the answers ID so that the front end users only see the column that should
  be exposed for reporting.
  
  Thank you

  Remove unnecessary columns from the presentation layer in the repository.

• Hide / disable the front panel

  Long story, long:

  I created a little utility like a VI.  The utility accepts command-line arguments, reads a file, outputs (using .NET) on the console, and then must close.  The front panel is empty, and the program is expected to completed in a fraction of a second.  In fact, I bet that "demand" fresh General takes longer than the actual program.  I would have coded in another language, but I can read only the cluster in a binary file with LabVIEW.

  Environment:

  Windows XP, LabVIEW 8.2.1, .NET Framework 3.5

  Short story:

  How to prevent a LabVIEW program displaying the front panel and appear in the taskbar?

  There is also an option to simply close the front panel, try with 100% transparent option also

  

• Is it possible to use a box Structure to hide digital indicators on the front panel, when they are not in use?

  I'm rather new to LabVIEW, only used for about 1.5 weeks from this post, it means that I may be missing something pretty obvious due to ignorance, but is it possible to make my front to change as my changes of breakage due to the selection of the user to a certain case via the front panel?

  The goal of the program is to make a simple layout for a user who uses the digital multimeter that the proposed code is designed for and I don't want tons of digital controllers and such clutter the screen that do not work with the function of the user uses to measure with.

  Thanks in advance.

  Yes.

  Two ways: 1. use a tab control.

  2. use of property nodes (Visible property).

  The tab control is a bit easier on the block diagram, but if some controls should appear in many cases it is difficult to do.  Property nodes take more space on the diagram but allows you the versatility to do almost everything you want.

  Read the help files and look at a few examples.

  Lynn

• Is it still possible to put the URL bar on the front?

  Before the most recent change on my windows machines, I have had the firefox toolbar url and tabs button all on a single bar inside the "aero" windows style window decoration.

  Is it still possible to do? For the moment, I can't move the toolbar URL or menu options out of the toolbar and in the window decoration. If this is not possible can be done with an add-on? This change has doubled real estate display should read these.

  1. Classic restaurateur theme installation and restart Firefox when prompted.
  2. Open the modules (Ctrl + Shift + A Manager; Mac: Command + shift + A), then the Extensions category.
  3. Beside the classical restaurant theme, click on the Options button.
  4. On the main tab, make sure 'Mobile back-forward button' is checked. You can also check "Hide urlbars stop & reload buttons" and "combine stop & reload buttons. Close the options window when finished.
  5. Right-click on a zone empty of the tab bar and select Customize.
  6. Drag the front/rear, address bar, and any other key that you want in the toolbar and navigation on the tab bar.
  7. Drag all the unwanted items off the coast of the toolbar and navigation on the range of customization.
  8. Click the Customize the output at the bottom right button when finished.
  9. In modules, Extensions category, beside the classical Restorer theme Manager, click the Options button.
  10. On the main tab, under general UI, check "hide navigation bar. Close the options window when finished.

• Is there any option to make Firefox 10 DO NOT hide the button back and forth?

  It seems to be a new feature in Firefox 10 front and back navigation buttons are hidden whenever they can without navigating a site, but switch to another site or more (not sure). However, I would like to Firefox to never hide the buttons, just as it was before.
  I tried to find something that sounded in full subject: config, but I was not successful.

  This is a new feature when the "lock hole" buttons previous/next is to display.
  
  When 'Use small icons' is not selected in mode to customize, and it is not the whole story 'before' the button "Go forward one page" is hidden. The Back button ever should not be hidden that even when there is no history «back»

  For the button according to see all the time:

  • Open the--> Customize the Mode <- and select small icons at the bottom of the Palette.
  • Or, move a separator to the left of the address bar, to separate the "back" button and the address bar. Alternatively, you can move the home button, or one of the Palette to go back buttons and the address bar regardless of the other.

• A way to group controls and indicators on the Front Panel and that they can be made Visible or not as a group?

  I would like to combine several orders and LEDs on the front panel in a group in a way that allows me to do the whole group Visible or not.

  I tried to use a Cluster, but it has a side effect that all elements must be inside the controls or indicators, but not mixed.

  Is there any graphic element, like a panel that can contain other controls and indicators on the inside and make them Visible or not as a group regardless of whether they are commands or the LEDs?

  Good suggestions on how to do this?

  Thank you.

  The tab control is still not my favorite, appearance but it's a way fast and effective to show and hide groups of controls and indicators.

• How to make non-visible control on the Front Panel appear at Design time?

  I have a few controls on the front whose visibility is changed (on or off) at run time. The problem is that if I stop the Run time, the visibility of the control remains in the running in design mode state. So I am not able to see or find the control to make changes in design mode.

  How can I make all the visible front-panel controls, or find and make it visible to a control on the front whose visibility has False?

  Thank you.

  It is documented in the help of LabVIEW.

  Hidden front panel display

  
  

  Perform the following steps to display a hidden front control or indicator. You can also hide the indicators and controls on the front panel.

  1. Find the terminal block schema for the object. "If you have multiple devices with the same type of data, right click on the terminals and select visible elements" Label in the context menu. Find the object with the label that corresponds to the object hidden façade.
  
  
  2. Right-click in the Terminal, and then select Show Control context menu if the object is a control or indicator to show if the object is an indicator.
  
  

  You can also use the Visible property to display the controls and indicators by program.

  You can also view all hidden front panel controls and indicators.

  Path: Fundamentals-> build the façade-> how-to--> configure the objects-> display on front panel of the façade hidden object.

• Why a VI block diagram display cannot show the display "connector" in the corner of UR, as does the front panel display?

  There may be a good reason for it that I just didn't understand. I saw no doubts, it searches the site of NOR, however.

  But it seems to me quite annoying to always have to go to the front to access the connector pane view, especially if some of these connectors are hidden. So I have to go the block diagram, guess what control/indicator I want display, go back to the FP to check it on the part of the connector, and then go back and hide it again, and repeat the operation if necessary. Even if the C / I is visible on the PF, it's still an extra step or two.

  When I build the connections using the diagrams and planning where to put connectors in subVIs they would be easier to associate (inputs/outputs on the sides line up, don't have to go up and down, etc.), it would be nice to be able to work completely in the realm of block diagram.

  Cameron

  Yamaeda wrote:

  Good idea, put it in the exchange of ideas!

  He has been there for some time already. No need to reproduce...

• Outsourcing of the controls on the front panel for a panel floating Subvi

  Hello!

  I already found a few similar topics, but I still don't know which is the best way to solve my problem. I will try to describe my problem in detail first: I have a main VI that acquires data from a device and displays these data in a large waveform graph. I have also a few controls on the front panel to control my device. First, I placed all of these device controls (digital, sliders, etc.) as well as the chart inside the front of my main VI. However, due to limited screen space now I would like to make the largest possible graph and so decided to "outsource" some controls out of the main façade of VI to several panels front-end Subvi.

  I would then press a button in my main VI and it would open the Panel before the floating of the Sub - VI corresponding with outsourced controls when required. However, everything must be absolutely transparent. It is important that floating panels to run in parallel with my main VI, that is the main VI must continue to operate. That way I'll have my data constantly updated in the chart in my main VI while I can change some settings of the device through the controls placed in my SubVIs. These changes will be immediately applied (for example as soon as the main VI calls this slot - VI in its main loop).

  It is important to the visibility of the outsourced optional control panel, i.e. If the Subvi front panel opens with the user that it will pop up and the user will be able to change the paramers device using the. But then the user should be able to close the front panel (hide) the Subvi to see the entire chart again without the Panel floating in front of her (of course control values must be maintained when the Subvi front is not visible). Then the new button is pressed in the main VI that opens the dialog box not modal Subvi containing controls and it can redefine new values of device.

  Advice how to do this are welcome. I don't know if I need something complex like VI server or asynchronous screws or I can solve my problem by changing some settings simple Subvi? Thank you in advance for your help!

  Best regards

  Anguel

  AStankov wrote:

  How about using a global variable for the VI at VI communication instead of a queue?

  A global variable will, also.  Write you in one place and read the value frequently to somewhere else (in the election). So you can see easily to any value change.  However, mark will waste a lot of time processor.  This is why I have proposed to use a queue or a notification utility.

  AStankov wrote:

  Would be the last option that you mentioned, i.e. finish the Subvi at each change of value, I would keep the Subvi front open as needed until things from the user to hide? Or would there be inevitable flickering Panel or any other drawbacks?

  Yes, the Subvi can keep the façade open until the user closes. And there should be no flickering.  The biggest drawback I see right now is that when you expect an event in the Subvi, the mainVI cannot stop without talking to the Subvi to stop.  So you'll need another channel of communication (again a global, a queue, a declarant or an event) to tell the Subvi that she must stop.