How much room for bleeding?

Similar Questions

• I tried to download Adobe Premier on my Macbook Pro and it says I don't have enough room.  How much room do I need?  If I use the cloud version, how much room do I need?

  I tried to download Adobe Premier on my Macbook Pro and it says I don't have enough room.  How much room do I need?  If I use the cloud version, how much room do I need?

  Mac OS

  • Processor Intel multicore with 64-bit support
  • Mac OS X v10.9 or v10.10
  • 4 GB of RAM (8 GB recommended)
  • 4 GB of disk space available for installation. additional space required during installation (cannot install on a volume that uses a case-sensitive file system or on removable flash storage devices)
  • Additional space required for preview files and other files to work (10 GB recommended)
  • 1280 x 800 display
  • Hard drive 7200 RPM (multiple fast disks configured in RAID 0 recommended)
  • QuickTime 7.6.6 software required for QuickTime features
  • In option: GPU card Certified Adobe for GPU acceleration
  • Recording and Internet connection are necessary for activation of the software required, validation of subscriptions, online access to services *.

• How much space for Time Machine backups

  Hello

  Is there a rule for how much space you may want to allow for Time Machine backups?

  I would like to partition the drive to have a room reserved for Time Machine back ups only.  I realize that it is a personal preference.

  Each individual backup occupies approximately 790 GB.  But somehow I have 6 months of backups that supposedly take up only 880 GB on the disk.

  At this time the backups of my other drive back to 6 months in time.

  Fortunately, I never had to go back a few more days to recover a file.

  Is there a reasonable amount of space to allocate for backups, based on current usage of disk?

  Thank you

  A Silverstone wrote:

  Hello

  Is there a rule for how much space you may want to allow for Time Machine backups?

  I would like to partition the drive to have a room reserved for Time Machine back ups only.  I realize that it is a personal preference.

  Each individual backup occupies approximately 790 GB.  But somehow I have 6 months of backups that supposedly take up only 880 GB on the disk.

  At this time the backups of my other drive back to 6 months in time.

  Fortunately, I never had to go back a few more days to recover a file.

  Is there a reasonable amount of space to allocate for backups, based on current usage of disk?

  Thank you

  Minimum would, of course, the size of the internal drive.

  Double the quantity is sufficient

  Triple the amount if you want a value years from TM backups

  I am convinced that these are independent external drives from your main hard drive of Machines

• How much cost for Windows Vista battery chargers

  I want to know how much a battery charger for windows vista, because mine does not much more. The only way it will work is if I push on it and keep my arms everything, which doesn't let me enjoy my time on the computer, I'm going shopping this month and I would like to know where I could buy one, and how it is.

  Contact the manufacturer of your laptop and ask them the price.

  See you soon. Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• How much CPU for my VM?

  Hello

  
  I'm currently learning how use ESXI (free version) and I have created a basic server that is currently running a virtual (Windows 2008 R2) machine. I've seen some people say that you should only set the machine to use 1 CPU. I wonder if there is any disadvantage or reasoning behind it, that my machine is Dual Core I had to perfer using two cores, as we simply lose at the moment.

  The machine works really well. I initially installed Windows 2008 R2 with the 2CPU parameter and it was fine, but I updated 1cpu after reading some forums, I have not really noticed much of a difference however.

  If I use the two hearts, I can add another virtual machine at a point in the future it would be still a problem having the value 2 to the virtual computer using 2 CPU, devrais I then put them both to one of each?

  Thank you.

  Function of the CPU load, you might be able to get between 5 and 8 vCPUs by heart so would you be able to add an another VM in the future without problem.  Let your VM with just a single vCPU.  When you add an another VM also give him a single vCPU.  ESXi Resource Scheduler will ensure that your virtual machines CPU load is distributed between the physical hearts of your system more effectively.

• How much power for AMD - A - 3670K, 1 TB 7200 HDD and a Samsung EVO 120 G SSD?

  I have a HP P6-2376 with a Holly2 MoBo and it came with a 300W power supply.

  I want to install a Samsung SSD of EVO to run WIN8 OS and also have a 1 TB 7200 RPM HARD drive.

  I have a 8 G or DDR3 1600 memory and currently have the AMD APU A4-3420, but am upgrading to the A6 - 3670 K.

  My current diet is adequate, from a 65W APU to an APU 100W so the new SSD?

  Thank you.

  Warhorse99, welcome to the forum.

  If it was me, I do the upgrades and see if an upgrade of the power supply is necessary.  It does not simply there is not enough power, but one thing is not custom.

  I just installed a Samsung EVO 840 500 GB, SSD.  I was given advice on installing it.  Connect the SSD to one of the other SATA connectors on the motherboard.  Let your HARD drive connected at the moment.  Then download and run the Samsung Data Migration tool.  Clone of the legacy of the SSD drive.  It was extremely easy.  When the migration is unplug the HARD drive and start.  My SSD started without a change in the BIOS.  Once the SSD is installed, you can also use "Samsung magician" to optimize for.  It is on the disc that came with the SSD drive.  The Migration of data from Samsung tool instructions are on the same page.  Make sure that the amount of data on the HARD drive is more than the amount that fits on the SSD.

  Please click on "BRAVO Thumbs Up" if I helped you and click on "Accept as Solution" If your problem is resolved.

• How much room windows 7 takes on a hard drive?

  I want to know what size is a lot of space, it will take on a disk hard when it was opened. I'm new to computer just now received a laptop running windows 7 and want to put windows 7 on a desktop computer if it has enough space. This will also help me out with my studies because we now need to take a computer class to graduate at the University and then I know more

  When you add applications, utilities, updates, service packs, etc and then add the space occupied by the page file, the system restore points, snapshots snapshots of volume while keeping the 25% free space to the good race and leaving space for future things, you're looking at a 100 GB partition...

• How much longer for "Solution to the issue: links at the top of the page does not work, or no arrow to move to the top.

  All the links and scroll controls on the top 1 inch of the active window do not respond. Down below this limit of 1 inch and all the links and scroll commands work.

  When will this be fixed?

  The top of the Firefox window is unresponsive, inadmissible toolbars - see also the problematic extensions

  • caused by the toolbar Yahoo- https://support.mozilla.com/questions/890908
  • caused by Babylon Toolbar - https://support.mozilla.com/questions/890670

• How much space is required for Adobe Pro XI disc?

  Get the message that I don't have enough disk space to download Adobe Pro XI, how much room does?

  Hi warringbb,

  Acrobat Pro 11 requires 1.85 GB of available disk space

  Please visit: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobatpro/tech-specs.html

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• the next upgrade to CS6 please - how do I get it and how much

  How do I get it and how much please for the next day at CS6

  [Duplicate I had adobe CS6 can you tell me the next update please so locking...] MOD]

  There is no upgrade to CS6.  CS6 is the last of its kind.  All versions of the application that were part of the Creative Suites in the past are now versions of subscription period for a rebate to switch to the lifestyle subscription spent except if you happen see/find.

  Creative cloud plans

  https://creative.Adobe.com/plans

• I get the message: Troubleshooting history too much room I am professional running windows. How can I fix it?

  My computer playing the odd and one of the reports trhat I get is: Troubleshooting history too much room

  How can I solve this problem

  go to the following address-

  Control Panel\All Control Panel Items\Troubleshooting

  & Click "run maintenance tasks" under system & security.

  Choose 'run as administrator' & 'apply repairs automatically' under Advanced option.

  Click next & your done... it will check for any questions & repair & will also clean history of troubleshooting.

  I hope this helps!

• How much time does it take for consistency detect node failure?

  Hello everyone
  
  We have an application that, among other things, using a call to NamedCache.invoke (object, InvocableMap.EntryProcessor)
  distribute work to agents hosted in about 80 JVMs, different with each probably manages a portion of the cache
  key range. In the present case, the cache is managed by a service with a backup-counter 0. EntryProcessor agents
  "on the other side" get an entry based on the key value and put it in the cache. Our questions:
  -If a JVM that hosts the service fails all of a sudden, how much time it take the coherence length to detect failure?
  -How long it take consistency to move the key range that manages a server failing to another JVM?
  -Are the requests sent through InvocableMap.invoke () be queued or retried when the key refers to a series of treaties
  by a failed server?
  
  It is feared that we can face visible to the user failures using a cache in a service with a backup-counter 0.
  
  Thanks for any help
  -Mike Murphy
  
  P. S.
  Sorry for the user1172219 user id tag - I understand that it will take an hour or two for a new handle to appear.

  Mike_M wrote:
  Hello everyone

  We have an application that, among other things, using a call to NamedCache.invoke (object, InvocableMap.EntryProcessor)
  distribute work to agents hosted in about 80 JVMs, different with each probably manages a portion of the cache
  key range. In the present case, the cache is managed by a service with a backup-counter 0. EntryProcessor agents
  "on the other side" get an entry based on the key value and put it in the cache. Our questions:

  -If a JVM that hosts the service fails all of a sudden, how much time it take the coherence length to detect failure?

  Depends on coherence version 3.6 running dead ping detection database too is really very fast (about 1 seconds, I think).
  detection of death based on ping earlier or not running is a bit slower, but still fast enough.

  -How long it take consistency to move the key range that manages a server failing to another JVM?

  If you have a backup-counter 0, you will lose all data in partitions in the abnormally missing node. That's why these partitions will bleed on their new owner, and this mission is quite fast. On the other hand, some other partitions must be rebalanced, which can take some time depending on the size of data.

  -Are the requests sent through InvocableMap.invoke () be queued or retried when the key refers to a series of treaties
  by a failed server?

  They can be retried, but since you have lost the partition, you can end up with incorrect data. I don't know what is really happening in this case.

  >

  It is feared that we can face visible to the user failures using a cache in a service with a backup-counter 0.

  It depends on what your application, if the content of the cache is missing.

  Best regards

  Robert

• How much is this going to cost me for updates?

  I would like to know how much I will charge for you to make updates?

  $0.00 in any currency.

  Install Firefox and mozilla.org updates are 100% free. www.mozilla.org/Firefox/All/

  You can even take the source and build it themselves.

  Is there a reason that there is a charge for a download of Firefox or updating?

• How can I move the margins so that I have MORE room for my messages

  I want to show more of my e-mail and less "Preview"... then how I move the margin to make more room for the message?

  Previously, answer you with a request to hit the edge of the window?

  If you move your cursor slowly, you should be able to pick up the horizontal divider between the message list and the message pane and drag it upward or down to suit.