I need account condition in where clause.

Hi all

I have a data

Product ID AMT

1100A
1100B
1100C
1100D
225A
240E
255F
350B
350A
350C
350G
412H
413E
414A
415I have

I need following output

IDAMTProduct
1100A
1100B
1100C
1100D
350B
350A
350C
350

G

I tried after query, but it does not work

Select

ID,

AMT,

Product

t

Product ID, AMT Group,

having count (distinct ID) = count (distinct AMT)

It returns all the rows.

Help, please

with t as)

SELECT id,

AMT,

product,

County (separate amt) over (partition by id) cnt

of sample_data

)

SELECT id,

AMT,

product

t

where cnt = 1

order by id

/

AMT ID P
---------- ---------- -
1 100 A
1 100 B
1 100 C
1 100 D
3 50
3 50
3 50
3 50

8 selected lines.

SQL >

SY.

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Need help with dynamic where clause.

    Hello world.  I'm kind of a novice with PL/SQL, so please be patient with me.  I am building a web application using Weblogic Oracle 11 g and Oracle database.

    To make a long story short, I need to generate the complex dynamic WHERE clause.  I don't know what will be the name of the column or the operator of comparison or the value will be until the moment of execution.

    I'm not 100% certain, but I think I need to use dynamic SQL statements.  Unless there is a better way to do it.

    I'm sure that using dynamic SQL opens me up to SQL injection attacks if I use simple string concatenation.  I would like to use bind variable if possible.

    In any case, it seems like trying to build a dynamic where clause does not seem to work as I want it would be...

    bv1 := 'colA = 5 and colB >= 9';
    
    query_str := 'SELECT * FROM view WHERE :bv1';
    
    OPEN CUR FOR query_str USING bv1;
    

    The code above pours out when I try to run it.

    Is there a way to build dynamic where the provisions without the use of concatenation of simple string that leaves me open to attacks by SQL injection?

    Thank you

    Hello.  I have read briefly upward on things, you suggested, but it seems a bit abstract for me since I was a novice.

    Can you give us an explanation or an example of how to use it to accomplish what I need to do?

    Do ypu really plan create a query with a WHERE clause that contains a predicate for all possible columns?

    Variable bind offer performance when the same query is executed several times with different values for bind variables.

    Select * from emp where empno =: v_empno

    After the first run Oracle will always be this query in the library cache. The next running can use the version of the cache even if the bind value is different.

    Select * from emp where empno =: v_empno;

    Select * from emp where ename =: v_ename;

    Select * from emp where sal =: v_sal;

    Each one is a DIFFERENT query. Yes - each of them uses a variable binding, but queries are different.

    So, if your username select EMPNO, an '=', and a value from the first query can be executed. But the next time that the user can select the ENAME column so that 'stored' first request may not be used given that the query does not match.

    The third time your user selects SAL so none of the first two queries can be used in the library cache. The use of bind variables gives performance during the SAME QUERY is used multiple times with DIFFERENT values for the variable binding. Oracle is not to analyze the hard query everything simply because the VALUE is different.

    So bind variables do not help you if most of the queries were completely DIFFERENT sets of predicates. And SYS_CONTEXT will not help either since that simply provides a way to define binds the values of the variables.

    Just for the simple example above, there are at least SIX possible combinations of columns that could choose your user name: empno, ename, sal, empno ename, empno & sal, ename & sal

  • Simple conditional SQL WHERE Clause with two Subselects

    Hi SQL Experts,
    I need some quick help with a query.
    It is a ' select ' for a data source object repository phyiscal table OBI.
    So, I can't put in PL/SQL or in stored procedures. I just need
    have two conditions / selects different according to the user's role (this information comes
    of the session).
    The above does not work:

    -ORA00905. 00000 - 'lack the key word'
    SELECT OFFICENO FROM orgunit
    WHERE

    BOX WHEN "SESSION_VARIABLE' LIKE '% globalmanager %' THEN
    ASSIGNEDOFFICES =
    (
    SELECT DISTINCT ASSIGNEDOFFICES
    FROM USERSTABLE INNER JOIN orgunit WE
    OrgUnit. KEY = USERSTABLE. OFFICE
    WHERE USERSTABLE. USERNAME ='VALUEOF (NQ_SESSION. THE USER)"
    )
    ON THE OTHER
    OFFICENO =
    (
    SELECT DISTINCT USERSTABLE OFFICENO
    INNER JOIN orgunit WE
    OrgUnit. KEY = USERSTABLE. OFFICE
    WHERE USERSTABLE. USERNAME ='VALUEOF (NQ_SESSION. THE USER)"
    )
    END;

    Can anyone help?

    Hello

    I can't tell what you want to do by looking at the code that do not do. Maybe:

    SELECT officeno

    For orgunit

    WHERE (session_variable LIKE '% globalmanager %'

    AND IN assignedofficies

    (

    SELECT assignedoffices

    UserTable U1

    JOIN orgunit o1 ON o1.officekey = u1.officekey

    WHERE u1.username = ' VALUEOF (NQ_SESSION. THE USER)"

    )

    )

    OR (NVL (session_variable

    , '?'

    ) NOT LIKE '% globalmanager % '.

    AND IN officeno

    (

    SELECT officeno

    Of u2 usertable

    JOIN orgunit o2 ON o2.officekey = u2.officekey

    WHERE u2.username = ' VALUEOF (NQ_SESSION. THE USER)"

    )

    )

    ;

    There might be a simpler and more efficient way in function your tables and your limit.

    The condition u2.username = ' VALUEOF (NQ_SESSION. The USER) "almost certainly not what you really want.

    .

    Whenever you have any questions, post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) for all of the tables involved and also publish outcomes from these data.
    Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
    Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).

    See the FAQ forum: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002#9362002

  • case of condition in where clause

    Hello

    I am a beginner in SQL, but according to my reading of the manual, this syntax should be acceptable. I'm using application express but tested also in Developer SQL and the conclusion that it fails with an error "invalid relational operator", with the line number pointing to the ELSE clause of the condition, but a number of column pointing to white space.

    This is a select statement nested, but that shouldn't matter. The fragment in question is:

    Select columns
    RES
    where res.villaid =: P605_VILLAID
    and INSTR (: P604_RES_STATES, res.states). = 0
    and (CASE: P604_EXCLUDE_ZERO)
    WHEN 'Y' THEN ' res.rate > 0'
    ELSE ' res.rate > = 0'
    END)
    and res. DEPARTDATE >: P605_STARTDATE
    and res. ARRIVEDATE < =: P605_ENDDATE.

    I hope that this puts ok shaped during the validation. The code is looking for bookings within a range of dates (which works very well when the other conditions are discussed), and should only output offset lines (nights) if the user asks for it in the variable of liaison P604_EXCLUDE_ZERO. There are probably other ways to go about this, but I'm too stubborn to renounce it. Well, not yet anyway.

    Thanks and greetings
    CS
    select some columns
      from res
     where res.villaid = :p605_villaid
           and instr (:p604_res_states, res.states) != 0
           and sign (res.rate) >= case when :p604_exclude_zero = 'Y' then 1 else 0 end
           and res.departdate > :p605_startdate
           and res.arrivedate <= :p605_enddate
    
  • How to check this condition in where clause

    WITH t1 AS
        (SELECT 1 empno, 'Sun' name,100 deptno, 'M' Gender  FROM dual
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 2,'Gun',100 deptno, 'F' FROM dual
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 3, 'Run',50,'M' FROM dual
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 4, 'Nun',75,'F' FROM dual
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 5, 'Tun',25,NULL FROM dual)
        SELECT empno,name,deptno,gender FROM t1;
    
    I want to display those dept. data which is having Genders both 'M' and 'F',

    You can use two ANDed 'exists' conditions...

    ...
    SELECT empno,name,deptno,gender FROM t1 t1o;
    where
    exists (select 'x' from t1 t1i where t1o.deptno = t1i.deptno and t1.gender = 'M')
    and
    exists (select 'x' from t1 t1i where t1o.deptno = t1i.deptno and t1.gender = 'F')
    
  • Result of conditional function where clause

    create the table datatest
    (number of primaryid,
    Identification number,
    power varchar2 (4).
    alias varchar2 (15))

    insert into values(1,100,'CNN','NEWS') datatest.
    insert into values(2,100,'BBC','SPORTS') datatest.
    insert into values(3,101,'CNN','INV') datatest
    insert into values(4,101,'ABC','MON') datatest
    insert into values(5,102,'BBC','REAL') datatest
    insert into datatest values (6 103, 'NEC', "TVL")

    I am looking for a query which returns lines with power CNN
    If the CNN feed isn't here then return the line with power BBC
    This is the result I'm looking for.

    1 100, CNN, NEWS
    3 101, CNN, INV
    5 102, BBC, REAL


    Thnx in advance
    create table datatest
    (
      primaryid number,
      secondaryid number,
      feed varchar2(4),
      the_alias varchar2(15)
    );
    begin
    insert into datatest values(1,100,'CNN','NEWS');
    insert into datatest values(2,100,'BBC','SPORTS');
    insert into datatest values(3,101,'CNN','INV');
    insert into datatest values(4,101,'ABC','MON');
    insert into datatest values(5,102,'BBC','REAL');
    insert into datatest values (6,103,'NEC','TVL');
    end;
    
    select *
    from
    (
      select
        primaryid,
        secondaryid,
        feed,
        the_alias,
        row_number() over (partition by secondaryid order by decode(feed, 'CNN', 1, 'BBC', 2) asc) as rn
      from datatest
      where feed in ('CNN', 'BBC')
    )
    where rn = 1
    

    Would be a solution.

  • Using decode in where clause

    Hello

    I need to use decode condition in where clause in such a way that if the respective column is null then consider the corresponding column

    for example

    Fee_dateFee_refund_date
    10 OCTOBER 05
    12 NOVEMBER 05
    11 JANUARY 06
    16 FEBRUARY 06

    I have a request in place as below where p_fee_flag will be passed as either FEES or set to null, I check another condition as if p_fee_flag is null then fee_date must be set to null when comparing fee_refund_date between TRUNC (BKT. ACT_START_DATE) AND TRUNC (BKT. ACT_END_DATE

    SELECT 1

    BUCKET BKT

    WHERE DECODE (P_FEE_FLAG, 'FEES', TRUNC(FS.) FEE_DATE), TRUNC (FS. FEE_REFUND_DATE))

    BETWEEN TRUNC (BKT. ACT_START_DATE) AND TRUNC (BKT. ACT_END_DATE)

    944524 wrote:

    Hello Alberto,.

    Thank you that's what I ask but is it possible to verify the condition even using decode

    Yes, it is possible, but why?

    Just replace the query in this way:

    select *
      from fee_table f
    where exists(select 1
                    from bucket b
                  where decode(:p_fee_flag, 'FEE', f.fee_date, f.fee_refund_date) between b.act_start_date and b.act_end_date)
      and decode(:p_fee_flag, 'FEE', null, f.fee_date) is null;
    

    Kind regards.

    Alberto

  • How to use the instruction box in where clause

    Hi all


    I need to use cases where clause guide me please how I can do it.


    AND WHEN BOX: KAPCO = "KAPCO" THEN cla. CLASS_NAME LIKE '% KAPCO % '.
    WHEN: KAPCO = "NON_KAPCO" THEN SUPERIOR (cla. CLASS_NAME) NOT LIKE '% KAPCO % '.
    WHEN: KAPCO = 'ALL' GOLD: KAPCO IS NULL SO SUPERIOR (cla. CLASS_NAME) LIKE '% '.
    END



    Concerning

    Published by: user10941925 on March 4, 2012 22:31

    Hello

    CASE expressions return a single value, for example a VARCHAR2. They do refer to code fragments.

    You usually don't need (or want) an expression BOX in a WHERE clause, or any other condition. I think that you were trying to do the equivalent of:

    AND     (     (:KAPCO = 'KAPCO'          AND cla.CLASS_NAME       LIKE '%KAPCO%')     -- Don't you want UPPER on this line?
         OR     (:KAPCO = 'NON_KAPCO'           AND UPPER(cla.CLASS_NAME) NOT LIKE '%KAPCO%')
         OR     (NVL (:KAPCO, 'ALL') = 'ALL'       AND cla.CLASS_NAME IS NOT NULL)
         )
    

    If you would care to post some sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) and the results desired from this data, I was able to test this.

  • ViewObject where Clause SET based on logged in user roles

    Hello Experts

    I have a view object based on a custom query to get distinct values from a table. My requirement is to display the results as a listview. The listview is is filled without any problem. But I need to add a where clause clause the object view based on the user roles.

    I have a method that generates the where clause and returns one string something like "COUNTRIES ('USA', 'UK').

    I created a class of the view object Impl and put WhereClause as below: but where clause is not applied when I run the page. I see everywhere instead of just USA & UK.

    Can you let me know at what time should I set the where the clause?

    SerializableAttribute public class CountriesVOImpl extends ViewObjectImpl {}

    /**

    * This is the default constructor (do not remove).

    */

    public CountriesVOImpl () {}

    this.setWhereClause (getCountries ());

    }

    public String getCountries() {}

    return '('USA', 'UK') COUNTRIES. "

    }

    }

    In class ViewImpl try to replace "executeQueryForCollection" and setWhereClause in this function as:

        protected void executeQueryForCollection(Object object, Object[] object2, int i)
        {
            setWhereClause("COUNTRY in ('USA','UK')");
            super.executeQueryForCollection(object, object2, i);
        }
    
  • where clause with reg_exp

    Hello

    My query is...

    The string is "1,2,3"...

    output must be '1', ' 2 ', ' 3',

    Please help me...!

    Concerning
    SA


    The guru gave the solution...
    select REGEXP_REPLACE('1, 2, 3', '([0-9]+)', '''\1''') from   dual;
    But, I have to use this condition in Where clause on my request. If I put in which the value of the clause does not appear. Any help on that...! Please, I beg you.

    Concerning
    SA

    Hello

    Query: SELECT "' | REPLACE ('1,2,3',',' "',"'). "' val FROM DUAL;

    will convert '1,2,3' string '1', ' 2 ', 3'.

    Run the sub queries first and then run a select statement.

    CREATE TABLE sample_table
    (
    col_a VARCHAR2 (3)
    );

    INSERT INTO sample_table
    VALUES ('1');

    INSERT INTO sample_table
    VALUES ('2');

    INSERT INTO sample_table
    VALUES ('3');

    INSERT INTO sample_table
    VALUES ('4');

    INSERT INTO sample_table
    VALUES ('5');

    COMMIT;

    SELECT col_a
    OF sample_table
    WHERE INSTR ((SELECT ''' ||)) REPLACE ('1,2,3',',' "',"'). "' val
    THE DOUBLE).
    col_a
    ) > 0;

    The select statement above will give you the desired result of "sample_table" as below.

    COL_A
    1
    2
    3

    Kind regards
    Big Boss

  • Where clause in VO

    Hello

    I'm trying to implement a clause where clause in the VO. I followed the steps but we get an error. My question is, before you run the query, how do I know the exact SQL statement that will get processed after pass us parameters using whereclauseparam?

    Another question I would like to ask you guys. In the Select statement that we use in VO, during execution, we need to add a where clause clause. Then in the whereclause, the names of the columns that we use are the database column names or names that the VO is displayed in the ViewObject?

    Thank you
  • Cannot run a «BUSINESS...» WHEN ' with a date in a WHERE CLAUSE condition

    Hello

    I need to check for a condition and date according to the date, he would check a set of host names or the other game... so I thought I could write something like this in the WHERE clause:

    AND HOST_NAME IN

    (

    CASE

    WHEN TO_DATE (: StopDate, 'MON-DD-YYYY') > = TO_DATE ('22 - DEC - 2015 "," DD-MON-YYYY ') THEN

    ('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC') ON THE OTHER

    ("SERVERNAME1", "NAMESERVER2", "SERVERNAME3")

    END

    )

    I get the following:

    ORA-00907: lack of right parenthesis

    00907 00000 - "lack the right parenthesis.

    But there is no missing parentheses!

    If I take the case... when... end, and run the host_name in ('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC') (separately, they run fine)...

    I also tried:

    AND

    (

    CASE

    WHEN TO_DATE (: StopDate, 'MON-DD-YYYY') > = TO_DATE ('22 - DEC - 2015 "," DD-MON-YYYY ') THEN

    HOST_NAME IN ('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC') ELSE

    HOST_NAME IN ('SERVERNAME1","NAMESERVER2","SERVERNAME3")

    END

    )

    the error I get is:

    ORA-00905: lack of keyword

    00905 00000 - 'lack the key word'

    What keyword miss me?

    Post edited by: c75d2e42-06a0-4eb1-a576-5652edcbfbe8

    Hello

    c75d2e42-06a0-4eb1-A576-5652edcbfbe8 wrote:

    It was a typo when transferred to the Oracle forum... the version of Oracle is: PL/SQL version 10.2.0.3.0 (10 G)

    I also used IF the statement and that has not worked (in error "missing parenthesis") which I'm sure is a matter of "syntax"... I did not know that the CASE statement returns the value single only, so it's probably the problem.  Is it possible to re - write this?

    ...

    IF only works in PL/SQL.  It does not in SQL, even if that SQL is embedded in PL/SQL.

    There are many ways to re - write the condition.  And here's one:

    AND ((host_name IN ('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC')

    AND TO_DATE (: StopDate, "MON-DD-YYYY") > = TO_DATE ('22-DEC-2015', "MON-DD-YYYY")

    )

    OR (host_name IN ('servername1","Nameserver2","SERVERNAME3")

    AND TO_DATE (: StopDate, "MON-DD-YYYY")<  to_date="" ('dec-22-2015', ="">

    )

    )

    If: StopDate can be NULL, it must be a bit more complicated.

    You can also use nested, such as CASE expressions

    AND THE CASE

    WHEN TO_DATE (: StopDate, "MON-DD-YYYY") > = TO_DATE ('22-DEC-2015', "MON-DD-YYYY")

    WHILE CASE

    WHEN host_name IN ('SERVERNAMEA', 'SERVERNAMEB', 'SERVERNAMEC')

    AND THEN 'OK '.

    END

    OTHER CASES

    WHEN host_name IN ('servername1","Nameserver2","SERVERNAME3")

    AND THEN 'OK '.

    END

    END = 'OK '.

    I wonder if this in your application is the best way, however.  If SERVERNAMEA was put into service on December 22, maybe that that fact should be recorded in a table.  If you have a table with 1 row per server, you can consider adding 2 columns DATE to show when the server was first and last used.  Then, rather than use a WHERE clause to test servers appropriate, you could do an inner join.

  • May I ask where clause to satisfy two conditions at the same time (and)

    Hello

    I wrote a few joins and usually in the final stage where condition with certain conditions be satisfied in where clause. In all conditions where I only want one and condition fulfilled only if both are collected.

    If we look at the this funciton is I should meet (get_order_type (ogr.order_number) <>'R')) AND wh1.third_party_warehouse! = 'Y') but I'm not get rid off both that if order_type is 'R' they are removed and if tooling_group is yes then ther are removed the result. I'm trying with both below pointed out together how can check these conditions? I can do in where clause?

    ((sg.tooling_stock_group <> 'Y'))

    and

    (get_order_type (ogr.order_number) <>'R'))

    Of order_goods_received ogr

    LEFT JOIN part_master pm

    On ogr.part_number = pm.part_number

    -stock_groups sg left join

    SG stock_groups left join

    on pm.stock_group = sg.stock_group

    and ((sg.tooling_stock_group! = 'Y'))

    and (get_order_type (ogr.order_number)! = 'R'))

    -Pm.stock_group = sg.stock_group

    LEFT JOIN batch_record_1 br1

    -A FEW MORE CODE HERE-

    WHERE ((ogr.delivery_date > = trunc (date_départ)))

    AND

    ((ogr.delivery_date < = trunc (end_date)))

    AND

    OGR.goods_received_number <>'1' AND

    get_order_type (OGR.order_number) NOT IN ('L') AND

    OGR.returned_to_supplier_indicator not in('S','L') and

    -sg.tooling_stock_group <>'Y '.

    -((sg.tooling_stock_group <> 'Y') and (get_order_type (ogr.order_number) not in ('R')))

    -(get_order_type (OGR.order_number) <>'R' AND sg.tooling_stock_group <>'Y')

    ((sg.tooling_stock_group <> 'Y'))

    and

    (get_order_type (ogr.order_number) <>'R'))

    AND wh1.third_party_warehouse! = « Y »

    UNION

    (

    Thank you.

    Whenever you have a problem with such logic, you should try and draw a logic state diagram:

    In your case, you are looking to two variables, with two possible States (equal to a value or is not it)

    Then, take this sense of the sg.tooling_stock_group T and O as being the get_order_type (ogr.order_number) and create a state diagram logical based on your description of what you want.  We will use a value of "Y" to indicate we want to record and a value of "N" to indicate the folder should not be returned.

    Start with an empty logical diagram...

    T = 'Y' T! = « Y »
    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |         |         | O = 'R '.
    |         |         |
    |         |         |


    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |         |         | O! = « R »
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    +---------+---------+

    First of all, you said: "If there is the result returned by the defined user function is"R"and the table that has the tooling_stock_group y then it should avoid this record."

    T = 'Y' T! = « Y »
    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |    N    |         | O = 'R '.
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |         |         | O! = « R »
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    +---------+---------+

    Then you said: "If order_type does not return" R' but the tooling_stock_group is 'Y', then I should not avoid recording ".

    T = 'Y' T! = « Y »
    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |    N    |         | O = 'R '.
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |    Y    |         | O! = « R »
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    +---------+---------+

    Now, you have not given any logic for the rest of the diagram, so I made the assumption that you do not want to avoid these records...

    T = 'Y' T! = « Y »
    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |    N    |    Y    | O = 'R '.
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |    Y    |    Y    | O! = « R »
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    +---------+---------+

    Now there are different ways to determine the location of the clause of this diagram.
    We could say that we want the records for all of the T column! = "Y" or all the records for all of the O line! " = R...

    where (sg.tooling_stock_group! = 'Y' or get_order_type (ogr.order_number)! = 'R')

    We say we want to EXCLUDE (using DO NOT) all records where T = "Y" AND O = "O" "

    If not (sg.tooling_stock_group = 'Y' and (ogr.order_number) get_order_type = 'R')

    Those are the two most logical ways to do.
    (In my previous answer, that we can see in this diagram, there is no need of the "or get_order_type (ogr.order_number).) (= 'R' "part, which is superfluous, but would not break it)

    Now let's look at your logic to see what it looks like to in the diagram...

    where ((sg.tooling_stock_group <> «Y»))
    and (get_order_type (ogr.order_number) <> 'R')
    )

    In a logic diagram that looks to...

    T = 'Y' T! = « Y »
    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |    N    |    N    | O = 'R '.
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    +---------+---------+
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    |    N    |    Y    | O! = « R »
    |         |         |
    |         |         |
    +---------+---------+

    As you can see, your logic was only targeting one of the 4 possible results for select records and excluding 3.

  • Difference-conditions (join and a Where Clause)

    Hi people,

    I need to clearly agree on what a difference exactly when we put any condition in INNER JOIN and the WHERE Clause.

    I have tried both way and found the same results. Even in the statistics Plan not much differences.  Any help would be appreciated.

    As:

    1 here, I use filter store in the join condition - Inner

    "SELECT i., Gl * Sc1.Item I.

    Inner Join Sc1.Part P

    On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id

    Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl

    On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

    And Gl.Location_Id in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

    Inner Join Sc1.Condition C

    On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id

    Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0

    And I.Condition_Id! = 325

    2. here I use filter store in Where clause-

    SELECT i., Gl * Sc1.Item I

    Inner Join Sc1.Part P

    On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id

    Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl

    On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

    Inner Join Sc1.Condition C

    On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id

    Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0

    and I.LOCATION_ID in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

    And I.Condition_Id! = 325

    Thank you

    Mark



    Hello

    MarkCooper wrote:

    Hi guys,.

    To reply to all - I understand.

    1. its good practice to use conditions / filter (except CLAUSE) in the WHERE Clause rather Inner join? bon ?

    2. now, in my previous example. We could use the location code in where clause as it was in the two tables.

    What is the best practice to use the code to location here ( 1 /2) ?

    1. here I use filter store in the Inner join condition ( guess the location code is not in the article table)).

    "SELECT i., Gl * Sc1.Item I.

    Inner Join Sc1.Part P

    On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id

    Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl

    On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

      And Gl.Location_Id in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

    Inner Join Sc1.Condition C

    On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id

    Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0

    And I.Condition_Id! = 325

    2. here I use filter store in Where clause (assume that the location code is not in the article table)-

    SELECT i., Gl * Sc1.Item I

    Inner Join Sc1.Part P

    On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id

    Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl

    On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

    Inner Join Sc1.Condition C

    On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id

    Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0

      And Gl.Location_Id in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

    And I.Condition_Id! = 325

    Thank you

    If location_id isn't in the item table, then the join condition

    On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

    will cause an error.

    Once more, it should not affect results or performance if a condition like

    Gl.Location_Id in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

    is in the clause or the WHERE clause.  No matter if it is be a column called location_id in any other table, or if the same column Gl.Location_Id is used in other conditions.

    As this condition only refers to a table (GI), I recommend you put it in a WHERE clause, just to make the code clearer.

    Yet once, this applies only to the inner joins, not for outer joins and not to CONNECT BY queries.

  • Try adding conditions to clause "and" stored in the table for the where clause, unknown syntax

    I am trying to add additional segments to the 'where' clause, and I don't know exactly how to proceed. I am currently using another table to search for keywords and sometimes there aren't everything. I use this table containing the key words to search the description and associate a symbol with a path.

    The code loops through the keywords with the keywords most associated and try to find links to a symbol then excludes those and search for symbols that correspond to those with less keywords and all. I am able to do this with 6 queries and manually changing the arguments, but I want to loop together so that if the changes need to be made in the future, I won't need to go digging in the code.

    Thanks, but that's ok. I already have a solution for this.

Maybe you are looking for