Immagerie two tables without a CARPENTER

Similar Questions

• Extraction of data from two tables without discounting

  Hi friends,
  
  I have a problem I want to extract data from two tables without discount in the text field when I will enter any value in a text field, then the value of corressponding must come to textfield corressponding.
  
  for example. There are two table A and B.
  Table A has Colunm
  
  S_ID number;
  C_ID Varchar2 (30);
  VARCHAR2 (4) s;
  
  Second table B Colunm name
  
  S_ID number;
  What varchar (30);
  L_Name varchar (20);
  
  When I enter in a text field then the c_id 101 s_id, dry, first_name and last_name should come to corressponding text without refresh fields.
  
  How can I do that.
  
  Thank you
  Maury

  You can use Ajax and there are tons of good examples out there for this purpose;
  For example [http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=31517:236:1876567353842241]

• JOIN the question... Join two tables without omitting lines

  I came across a problem that should be an easy fix (I hope), but I'm having a hard time to come up with a solution.

  Basically I have two tables, one with the actual amounts with the budget. I have to write a sql statement select that joins these tables together and includes all of their lines. I was able to join the tables by using JOIN, LEFT JOIN and RIGHT JOIN, but it always fails the lines I need.

  Below, I have examples of my tables (AMOUNT_TABLE and BUDGET_TABLE). For simplicity, I built the examples to show the same values in the first four columns, with the 5th and 6th columns (SUB_ACCOUNT, AMOUNT, BUDGET) as the only values that are different. My actual tables are not quite that simple, but I don't think it was relavent to this issue.

  AMOUNT_TABLE

  FISCAL_YEAR	PERIOD	ACCT_UNIT	ACCOUNT	SUB_ACCOUNT	AMOUNT
  2013

  111111555555000010020131111115555551000100201311111155555520001002013111111555555300010020131111115555554000100

  BUDGET_TABLE

  FISCAL_YEAR	PERIOD	ACCT_UNIT	ACCOUNT	SUB_ACCOUNT	BUDGET
  2013

  1111115555553000200201311111155555540002002013111111555555500020020131111115555556000200

  Here's what I hope. Note that SUB_ACCOUNTs 0000, 1000, and 2000 show without budget amounts since there is not a corresponding line in the BUDGET_TABLE. And same for SUB_ACCOUNTs 5000 and 6000, they show budgets with no amount because there is not a corresponding line in the AMOUNT_TABLE.

  (exit)

  FISCAL_YEAR	PERIOD	ACCT_UNIT	ACCOUNT	SUB_ACCOUNT	AMOUNT	BUDGET
  2013	1	11111	555555	0000	100	0
  2013	1	11111	555555	1000	100	0
  2013	1	11111	555555	2000	100	0
  2013	1	11111	555555	3000	100	200
  2013	1	11111	555555	4000	100	200
  2013	1	11111	555555	5000	0	200
  2013	1	11111	555555	6000	0	200

  If all goes well, my question is clear. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

  Use the join ANSI - FULL OUTER JOIN syntax:

  with amount_table like)

  Select fiscal_year 2013, 1 period, 11111 acct_unit, 555555, 0000 sub_account, amount 100 of all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,1000,100 from all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,2000,100 from all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,3000,100 from all the double union

  Select double 2013,1,11111,555555,4000,100

  ),

  budget_table like)

  Select 1 time, 11111 acct_unit, account 555555, sub_account 3000, 2013 fiscal_year, budget of 200 Union double all the

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,4000,200 from all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,5000,200 from all the double union

  Select double 2013,1,11111,555555,6000,200

  )

  Select nvl (a.fiscal_year, b.fiscal_year) fiscal_year,

  period of NVL (a.period, b.period),

  NVL (a.acct_unit, b.acct_unit) acct_unit.

  account of NVL (a.Account, b.Account),

  NVL (a.sub_account, b.sub_account) sub_account.

  Amount NVL(a.amount,0),

  NVL(b.budget,0) budget

  of amount_table one

  full join

  budget_table b

  on)

  a.Fiscal_Year = b.fiscal_year

  and

  a.period = b.period

  and

  a.acct_unit = b.acct_unit

  and

  a.Account = b.account

  and

  a.sub_account = b.sub_account

  )

  /

  FISCAL_YEAR PERIOD ACCT_UNIT ACCOUNT SUB_ACCOUNT AMOUNT BUDGET
  ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
  2013 1 11111 555555 0 100 0
  2013 1 11111 555555 1000 100 0
  2013 1 11111 555555 2000 100 0
  2013 1 11111 555555 3000 100 200
  2013 1 11111 555555 4000 100 200
  2013 1 11111 555555 6000 0 200
  2013 1 11111 555555 5000 0 200

  7 selected lines.

  SQL >

  SY.

• How to join two tables without constraints?

  I want to get back the tables to join without constraints!
  
  Table 1:
  
  get 100
  101 wet
  series 102
  
  and
  
  Table 2:
  
  10 xxx movies
  11 yyy
  12 zzz
  QUERY 1:
  
  SELECT * FROM TO LEAVE P, CUSTES C
  WHERE (P.ID, P.NAME, C.ID, C.NAME) IN (SELECT P1.ID, P1.NAME, C1.ID, C1.NAME
  OF P1, C1 CUSTES TO GO)
  
  I got the result like this,
  
  ID ID NAME
  101 wet 10 xxx
  zzz 101 wet 12
  YYY 101 wet 11
  Get 100 10 xxx
  102 the yyy 11 value
  series 102 10 xxx
  100 get 11 yyy
  100 get 12 zzz
  102 the value 12 zzz
  
  All ranks was sent three times! but I need to write once.
  
  QUERY 2:
  
  Select id as pid, name as the name of go
  Union
  Select id as pid, name as the name of custes;
  
  QUERY2 OUTPUT IS.
  
  NAME OF PID
  10 xxx movies
  11 yyy
  12 zzz
  get 100
  101 wet
  series 102
  
  In the 2nd query get the attached files of the two tables. But my need is two tables record to display like this
  
  ID NAME NAME_1 ID_1
  Get 10 xxx 100
  wet 11 101 yyy
  set of 12 zzz 102
  
  I'm looking for is, I want to join in parallel columns in my trips!
  
  Is there a source... ? or the same code is happy...!

  Something like that?

  WITH t1 AS (SELECT '100' id, 'get' name FROM DUAL
              UNION
              SELECT '101', 'wet' FROM DUAL
              UNION
              SELECT '102', 'set' FROM DUAL),
       t2 AS (SELECT '10' id, 'xxx' name FROM DUAL
              UNION
              SELECT '11', 'yyy' FROM DUAL
              UNION
              SELECT '12', 'zzz' FROM DUAL)
  SELECT id,
         name,
         (SELECT id
            FROM (SELECT ID, name, ROWNUM rw FROM t2) t_in
           WHERE t_in.rw = t_out.rw)
            id_1,
         (SELECT name
            FROM (SELECT ID, name, ROWNUM rw FROM t2) t_in
           WHERE t_in.rw = t_out.rw)
            name_1
    FROM (SELECT ID, name, ROWNUM rw FROM t1) t_out
  

  SQL> WITH t1 AS (SELECT '100' id, 'get' name FROM DUAL
    2              UNION
    3              SELECT '101', 'wet' FROM DUAL
    4              UNION
    5              SELECT '102', 'set' FROM DUAL),
    6       t2 AS (SELECT '10' id, 'xxx' name FROM DUAL
    7              UNION
    8              SELECT '11', 'yyy' FROM DUAL
    9              UNION
   10              SELECT '12', 'zzz' FROM DUAL)
   11  SELECT id,
   12         name,
   13         (SELECT id
   14            FROM (SELECT ID, name, ROWNUM rw FROM t2) t_in
   15           WHERE t_in.rw = t_out.rw)
   16            id_1,
   17         (SELECT name
   18            FROM (SELECT ID, name, ROWNUM rw FROM t2) t_in
   19           WHERE t_in.rw = t_out.rw)
   20            name_1
   21    FROM (SELECT ID, name, ROWNUM rw FROM t1) t_out;
  
  ID  NAME ID_1 NAME_1
  --- --- -- ---
  100 get 10 xxx
  101 wet 11 yyy
  102 set 12 zzz
  
  SQL>
  

  The number of rows in the tables are the same?

• Join of two tables without Cartesian?

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  SELECT BAGLANTIDATE, CABONE
  FROM SEDEF_BILGI
  WHERE CABONE = '1' AND
  BAGLANTIDATE BETWEEN TO_DATE('10-JUN-2009','DD,MON-YYYY')
  AND TO_DATE('11-JUN-2009','DD-MON-YYYY')
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BAGLANTIDATE                CABONE
  ------------------------- ---------- 
  10-JUN-09 03.01.52.546000000 AM 1          
  10-JUN-09 05.02.06.453000000 PM 1          
  10-JUN-09 01.01.20.421000000 PM 1          
  10-JUN-09 07.01.42.062000000 AM 1          
  10-JUN-09 09.44.59.515000000 AM 1          
  10-JUN-09 09.58.07.843000000 AM 1          
  10-JUN-09 09.01.50.546000000 PM 1          
  
  7 rows selected
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  SELECT KAYITDATE, ABONE
  FROM GPRS_TB_SAYACISEMRI
  WHERE ABONE = '1' AND
  KAYITDATE BETWEEN TO_DATE('10-JUN-2009','DD,MON-YYYY')
  AND TO_DATE('11-JUN-2009','DD-MON-YYYY')
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  KAYITDATE                   ABONE
  ------------------------------------- -------------------
  10-JUN-09 09.52.57.796000000 AM 1
  10-JUN-09 02.13.32.343000000 PM 1
  
  2 rows selected

  I need a code that will help me to show the 9 values in the following form

  BAGLANTITARIH        ABONE
  ------------------------      ----------------
  10-JUN-09 03.01.52.546000000 AM 1          
  10-JUN-09 05.02.06.453000000 PM 1          
  10-JUN-09 01.01.20.421000000 PM 1          
  10-JUN-09 07.01.42.062000000 AM 1          
  10-JUN-09 09.44.59.515000000 AM 1          
  10-JUN-09 09.58.07.843000000 AM 1          
  10-JUN-09 09.01.50.546000000 PM 1    
  10-JUN-09 09.52.57.796000000 AM 1
  10-JUN-09 02.13.32.343000000 PM 1
  
  9 rows

  How can I do? If someone helped me on this subject, I would really appreciate it...
  Kind regards
  Sedef

  SELECT BAGLANTIDATE BAGLANTIDATE, CABONE CABONE
  FROM SEDEF_BILGI
  WHERE CABONE = '1' AND
  BAGLANTIDATE BETWEEN TO_DATE('10-JUN-2009','DD,MON-YYYY')
  AND TO_DATE('11-JUN-2009','DD-MON-YYYY')
  union all
  SELECT KAYITDATE, ABONE
  FROM GPRS_TB_SAYACISEMRI
  WHERE ABONE = '1' AND
  KAYITDATE BETWEEN TO_DATE('10-JUN-2009','DD,MON-YYYY')
  AND TO_DATE('11-JUN-2009','DD-MON-YYYY')
  

  Ravi Kumar

• Two filters in two dimensions without constraining the fact table

  Hi all
  
  does anyone know how to avoid the factual constraint when you create a report with two filters on different dimensions?
  
  I have a fact table big with more than 10 million lines. In the starmodel is the customer of the dimension and the products. I create a filter on the customer atrribute 'Status' and set to 'active '. Now I add the "Product Type" column of the dimension 'Product' in the filter section. When I want to choose a value OBIEE executes a select statement in the fact table. So I have to wait very long to select a value. Is it possible to say OBIEE only to select the dimension table without joining the fact table?
  
  Thank you much in advance.
  
  Kind regards
  Stefan

  Use is implied.

  Create a table of facts of the DUMMY and make also implied made for this dimension column. It will solve the problem.
  http://obiee11gqna.blogspot.com/2011/01/implicit-fact-column-in-OBIEE.html

  Published by: MK on January 17, 2012 07:08

  Published by: MK on January 17, 2012 07:08

• Match 2 tables without case-sensitivity

  I have two tables and I am looking to correspond by e-mail

  SELECT *.

  WHERE A.EMAL = b.EMAIL

  However, it seems to be case sensitive.

  How to I removed match without the sensitive

  Table A

  ID	EMAIL
  1	[email protected]

  Table B

  ID	E-MAIL
  2	[email protected]

  Hi Chole_19,

  Convert in the same case and then compare as suggested above.

  also try to use the trim bofore turning them into a similar case.

  SELECT *
  WHERE LOWER(TRIM(A.EMAL)) = LOWER(TRIM(b.EMAIL))
  

  Kind regards

  Jitendra

• Get 2 amounts of 2 columns of 2 tables without primary key

  I would like to get the sum of column A of table 1 and the sum of column D in table 2 without using the primary key.

  Because I can't link the two tables, the only corresponding value is not the primary key.

  TABLE 1

  COLUMN A.     COLUMN B |    COLUMN C

  PAID NUMBER DESCRIPTION

  15472 blabla1 S15-875

  18515

  S15-875 blabla1

  215526.52 blabla2 D17-517

  ...                               ...                           ...

  TABLE 2

  COLUMN D |     COLUMN E |    COLUMN F

  INVOICE

  NUMBER

  DESCRIPTION

  185525 blabla1 S15-875

  158520 D17-517 blabla2

  8964

  D17-517

  blabla2

  I would like to see the number, the sum of which should be paid and what has been paid.

  But as you can see, you can pay in several times and there may be several invoices.

  There is therefore no link between two tables which is a primary key in both entities.

  No idea how I could get it?

  NUMBER |    DESCRIPTION |    BILL |     PAID

  S15-875 185525 33987 blabla1

  D17-517 blabla2 167484 215526.52

  The tables can be attached on «NUMBER», regardless of weather conditions, as a primary key is defined.

  sql> with table_1 as
    2    (         select 15472     as paid, 'S15-875' as "NUMBER", 'blabla1' as description from dual
    3    union all select 18515     as paid, 'S15-875' as "NUMBER", 'blabla1' as description from dual
    4    union all select 215526.52 as paid, 'D17-517' as "NUMBER", 'blabla2' as description from dual
    5    )
    6  , table_2 as
    7    (         select 185525    as invoice, 'S15-875' as "NUMBER", 'blabla1' as description from dual
    8    union all select 158520    as invoice, 'D17-517' as "NUMBER", 'blabla2' as description from dual
    9    union all select 8964      as invoice, 'D17-517' as "NUMBER", 'blabla2' as description from dual
   10    )
   11  select t1."NUMBER"     as "NUMBER"
   12  ,      t1.description  as description
   13  ,      ( select sum(t2.invoice) from table_2 t2 where t2."NUMBER" = t1."NUMBER" ) as invoice
   14  ,      sum(t1.paid)    as paid
   15  from   table_1 t1
   16  group by t1."NUMBER"
   17  ,        t1.description
   18  /
  
  NUMBER  DESCRIP    INVOICE       PAID
  ------- ------- ---------- ----------
  D17-517 blabla2     167484  215526.52
  S15-875 blabla1     185525      33987
  

  BTW: 'NUMBER' is a horrible name for a column. I strongly recommend to change something that is not a reserved word.

• Potential problems for tables without primary keys and unique keys

  GoldenGate 11.2.1.0.3/Solaris 10
  DB: Oracle for Oracle (Source and target is 11.2.0.3)
  Topology: unidirectional
  
  
  In our one-way configuration GG, little of the tables being replicated is not a primary key or a Unique key.
  
  Last week when we have implemented GG for the test, we received warnings for these table below.
  

  GGSCI > add trandata WMHS_UD.crtn_dtl
  
  2013-01-12 11:34:33  WARNING OGG-00869  No unique key is defined for table 'CRTN_DTL'. All viable columns will be used to represent the key, but may not guarantee uniqueness.  KEYCOLS may be used to define the key.
  
  Logging of supplemental redo data enabled for table WMHS_UD.crtn_dtl.

  Replication seems to work very well for these tables.
  
  Googling, I think that there may be performance degradation when you replicate tables without PK or the United Kingdom.
  
  But are there other potential problems such as data of a certain kind not replicated to the lack of PK/UK?

  It really depends on the data.

  By default, GG is combining all columns as a virtual primary key but don't no conflict control by default. So when you can be sure that the record you insert into the table is unique, then it will work.
  BUT as soon as you insert the same record, which is already inserted, then you will encounter problems.

  Let me show what happens when you use an initial charge because it makes it easier to describe:
  We start at 10:00 the capture for a table. Now, you insert a record at 10:00 in the tables. When you now start an initial charge to 10.02, then check you have inserted in the database to 10.01 will be repeated two times. During the IPL as the initial charge is made to 10.02 and it includes data of 10.01 AND it will be replicated again through the process of capture/replicate.

• You would design Tables without primary key?

  If you were asked to design a schema, if you create a table (however irrelevant) without a primary key? For example, a 'unprofessional' table such as a logging of errors table that records exceptions thrown from stored procedures, create you this table without a primary key?

  In a relational database you define und work with entities (tables) and you put in relationship to each other by joins. An entity must by definition always be identified by a unique key.
  If you don't know what kind of unique key identifies your entries in the table, it is almost certain that working from home in your datamodel and table designs had not been made. Your database objects contain tables, and they must have a unique identifier. Often it is a primary key (PK) composed of several columns.

  By definition a datamodel that contains the tables without primary keys is nomore a relational datamodel and one of the fundamental bases for the creation of a relational database is violated.

  Frankly I do not understand why Oracle allows the tables without primary key. Another system such as SAP R/3 are more stringent. Primary keys are required in the SAP and believe, when starting, it is sometimes tedious to define the primary key structures, but it's the basis of designing together relational datamodel you will put in place. You now SAP is based often on a DB ORACLE layer. They could do it, and these "extend" their functionality. But they are smart guys in Walldorf, and they always refrained to do. It's a good guess to believe, they have a good reason for it.

  Tables without primary key are NO relational tables, they are dungpiles. As Oracle needs priimary key itself in order to operate a relational database, ROWID have been defined. ROWID is the primary keys of the tables where the customer does not have a PK. But nice as ORACLE is, they strongly recommend not to use these ROWID in the application or database layer. ROWID is no identifier object that are stable in time and space (eg. two different databases in a distributed design oder a DEV and PROD-system).

  Definition of PK implies certain rules for the programming of your application and your DML operations. Especially you often MERGE in a relational table instead of simply INSERT'ing piece in a dungpile.

  When it later on with SELECT large datavolumes dataaccess, again the differences between well-defined joins (all based on the PK-relations) and joins non-unique keys will be the order of magnitude. Not only that, the latest degrades in performance much more quickly with the growth of result sets. When you start fumbling with no UNIQUE INDEXES, speed up performance in the operations of dungpiling you are already closer to hell than on a sunny day in the world of relational data.

  Othmar Lippuner
  SQL Reporting professional

• BUG? Statement of BRIDGE to compare two tables

  Hello
  
  I tried to compare two tables different dbs and remembered a post on applications to Connectin Cross
  http://barrymcgillin.blogspot.com/2010/11/cross-connection-queries.html

  BRIDGE temparb AS "EB05 01"
  (SELECT * FROM arb)
  (SELECT * FROM temparb 
  MINUS 
  SELECT * FROM arb
  )
  UNION ALL
  (SELECT * FROM arb
  MINUS
  SELECT * FROM temparb 
  );

  I expect to get the differences between the ARB table in my current schema and the table alias temparb arb in the other db. Yet it seems that in this case only the table in my current schema is read.
  
  I materialize at the table BRIDGE with

  BRIDGE temparb AS "EB05 01"
  (SELECT * FROM arb)

  and select the value that I know to be only in the remote schema

  SELECT id FROM temparb WHERE id = 2562;
  SELECT id FROM arb WHERE id = 2562;

  Both times I get no results. I even tried to use aliases on the table, same result. Tested in EA3 3.0 and 3.1.
  
  Has anyone tried this before?
  
  Concerning
  Marcus

  Hi Marcus,

  Have you tried without the quotes around the name of connection?

  I have a named connection
  system_local
  which I run the following command

  drop table testbridge_remote;
  drop table testdbrige;
  create table testbridge (col1 int);
  insert into testbridge values (1);
  insert into testbridge values (2);
  insert into testbridge values (3);
  commit;

  I have a named connection
  Name of the connection with space
  I performed the following in the

  drop table testdbrige;
  create table testbridge (col1 int);
  insert into testbridge values (4);
  insert into testbridge values (5);
  insert into testbridge values (3);
  commit;

  Then I can execute the following statement in the connection of system_local/worksheet

  BRIDGE testbridge_remote as the name of connection with Space(select * from testbridge)
  + (SELECT * FROM testbridge_remote +)
  LESS
  SELECT * from testbridge
  +)+
  UNION ALL
  + (SELECT * FROM testbridge +)
  LESS
  SELECT * from testbridge_remote
  +);+

  It works well.
  Returns the rows in the remote table not in the local table and lines in the local table, not the remote table.

  Kind regards
  Dermot
  SQL development team.

• Add a simple table without one logical join to another table (OBIEE 10 g)

  Sometimes I want to just show a simple table without a logical join to another table in the repository. However, every time I move the layer Business model and mapping and an audit of overall coherence, he tells me that he has a logical join and I am forced to create another table to join her. Creating a dimension-fact relationship. There are times where I need this relationship and I want to just display some data. Is anyway to circumvent this?
  
  Thanks in advance!

  Yes, you must create a join. You can't take one table to MDB layer. You can create an alias for the table. Join this alias and the base through any common column table and take the two tables in MDB and table you want to the presentation layer.

  Another way is to create a view in the physical layer. Write a select statement as

  Select Table primary_key

  Where primary_key is the primary key of the base table. Join the base table of view ith and repeat the steps defined for the Alias.

  Kind regards
  Sandeep

• a table are in the other table without duplicate

  How to check the records in a table are in the other table without duplicate.
  
  for example, in the tables below, the records from the Table A are in Table B1. But the B2 table has duplicate and one record is missing.
  I want to know which records are not in table B, records that have two copies.
  as A and B2, 1 2 is not in B2, 1 1 a 2 folders in B2
  
  A and B1, nothing should be returned.
  
  Table A
  -----------
  A1 A2
  -----------
  1 1
  1 2
  1 3
  -----------
  
  Table B1
  -----------
  A1 A2
  -----------
  1 1
  1 4
  1 2
  1 3
  2 2
  -----------
  
  
  Table B2
  -----------
  A1 A2
  -----------
  1 1
  1 4
  1 3
  2 3
  1 1
  -----------
  
  version is the database of Oracle 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64 bit Production
  
  Thank you!!

  Two standard methods to compare the tables are either to use DEFINED such as UNION, UNION operations or LESS.
  Or use a FULL OUTER JOIN.

  If the structure of the table is the same and that you want to compare all the columns, then set them operators are the best way.

  If you want to compare only on one or more columns and want to see the other columns, then a FULL OUTER JOIN is the best way.

  Here is an example

  select A1, A2,
        count(distinct sourcetable) cnt_tables,
        count(sourcetable) cnt_records,
        count(case when sourcetable = 'A'  then 1 end) record_is_in_A,
        count(case when sourcetable = 'B1'  then 1 end) record_is_in_B1,
        count(case when sourcetable = 'B2'  then 1 end) record_is_in_B2
     (select 'A' sourceTable, a.* from tableA a
      union all
      select 'B1' sourceTable, b1.* from tableB1 b1
      union all
      select 'B2' sourceTable, b2.* from tableB2 b2
     )
  group by A1, A2
  having  count(distinct sourcetable) < count(sourcetable) ;
  

  It is an example. It will show you the records that have duplicate data in the following tables.
  If you want to display all records that are in A but not in B1, you can add a few other checks.

  Published by: Sven w. on August 13, 2010 17:23

• query by default two tables for block

  Hello
  How can I make defaulet query block of two tables?
  I know it's default_query in set_block_property, but there is no clause only 'where' and I put clause of two tables. Is a solution?
  
  concerning

  You can use a block of Clause From database. This allows you to base a block on a complex query without having to create a view in the database. Here are the steps:
  

  
  
  1. Manually create a data block
     
  2. Create an item in the block for each column returned by the query - make sure that the data type is correct.
     
  3. In the block properties, set the following properties:
     
     
     
     • Query data Source type = F R O M Clause query
       
     • Data Source Name = your request
       
     • Mode key = U p d a t a b l e
       
     
     
  
  Note: If your query uses summary calculations, make sure you alias the result and ensure that matches alias name of the item in the data of block. It should also be noted that the blocks based on a F r o m query Clause are read-only. If you need be able to update the underlying tables, you can use transactional triggers or the block of data based on a procedure.

  For a complete list of this process - Discover My Oracle Support Document ID: * 69884.1 - how to use F rom query Clause in forms *.

  Hope this helps,
  Craig B-)

  If someone useful or appropriate, please mark accordingly.

  Published by: Silvere on August 10, 2010 12:37

• Insert data into the table without using the insert or select the command

  Hello
  
  Is there anyway to insert data from one table to another table, without using insert, and then select the command in the same pattern.
  Note: the two tables have the same structure.

  ALTER table... Swap partition...