Initializations unrecognized local table

Similar Questions

• Code to skip the steps: initialization of local variables failed

  Hi all

  I'm upgrading some software LabVIEW RT I inherited LabVIEW 2011 to 2015 LabVIEW (32-bit) on a host Windows 7 Professional PC. The target is an SMU-8135. The software ran well when it is compiled under LabVIEW 2011.

  I modified the code to enable the monitoring of what is happening by looking at screen on the target outputs. The initial error that brought me here is that a local cluster variable initialized in the first window of the flat sequence described below have been appearing as the in windows later.

  The code begins with the initialization of local variables in the first window of a flat sequence and provides a quick line of text output to the display of the target (call this text #1) (using RT Debug String.vi) I send two lines of text so that a new row is created and later text does not replace it. . It then writes to the next window in the sequence flat screen two groups of text output to the target. Second text in the window 2 (#3 text) output is equipped with a wire entry from the error from the first text output in the second window (text #2). That is the second exit must wait for the first exit to complete before being sent to the screen.

  I see now some weird symptoms:

  1. when I connect to the target under a remote debugging session I see expected display outputs. Not remotely connected, text #2 is displayed. The code passes to the third window in the flat sequence, so everything in the two window should have executed.

  2. the text #1 appears on the target screen * before * I get the message "Welcome to LabVIEW Real-time 15.0." Is this normal? Whence this message? I searched my screws and subvis to this text and it is not there then it mucst come LabVIEW screws somehow.

  This all started with local variables no initialization in the first window, so apparently, I have a problem of data flow. Given that the problem disappears under the remote debugging, I'm a bit of a loss.

  Thanks in advance for any help,

  Eamonn McKernan

  EamonnMcKernan wrote:

  Text 2 appears only when remotely connected it does not appear when running at startup.

  Your "text 2" seems to be powered by a collection of nodes comments to "initialize on compile or load.  This will return once the empty string the first and therefore should not be display nothing until the code I run a second time.  That is the crux of feedback for?

• initialize the control table dimension

  I use LV 2009 SP1 and you want to create a table 1 d of size control fixed.  The elements of the array are a defined group of different controls (enum and boolean) data type.  Control table will reside on a front panel and will be initialized with the values via the software, but the user will have access to change the values of array element (for example, change the enum and boolean controls.  While the user has access to edit the elements of the array, I don't want the user to be able to add new items in the table.  The table must have a vertical scroll bar, given that the number of elements at initialization of the array can be great and also can vary.  I am familiar with the property of the table "Number of lines", but it only controls the number of visible rows in the table.

  Is there a way to set the number of items per program and still have a scroll for the user to index bar using the table, but not add new items?

  Also see the attached screenshot for reference.

  Thank you

  Dan

  I found an acceptable solution through the reading of other forum posts.

  For others, who may find this useful:

  By hiding the display of array index and all the scroll bars, the table can be fixed to the size.  A separate scrollbar is used for the index in the table by writing to the array of Index values property.  The min/max scroll bar may be limited by writing to the Min Doc, Doc Max properties.  I've attached a screenshot of the block diagram.  The value of constant labeled '# lines visible-1' is on the number of items pulled on the panle front less 1 and remains in control of the table of displayiong of the empty elements that allow the user to change.  Also, even if the Page Size property has a value of zero for the scorllbar, which should allow scrolling of the Min Doc to Doc Max, he does not accept it as a valid value and is instead converted to a value of 1.  I introduced a SR on it's a bug because the LV help suggests that the values zero or negative must be acceptable to the Size property of the Page.

  I think it's the solution to the question, although it would be preferable that the size of the table control could be fixed size affecting a property element.  I'll see about adding this title of suggestion.

  Dan

• How to initialize the typedef table without losing the typedef

  Hello

  I'm running problems with initialization of a typedef that contains an array of clusters. The attached example updates the Clusters and displays the new table.

  It works great but I would rather to pre-allocate memory the entire table.

  I came with indexing the typedef, using the element for initialization of table vi but with this approach I loose the typedef.

  Is there a good way to initialize the typef?

  Thank you

  Lukas

  
  

• Remote index not used with INSERT in the local table on dblink

  Hi all
  
  I don't know if anyone has come across this problem before, but for some reason any the remote index remains unused ONLY* in the insertion on the local database operation. Let me explain this pseudo-device code
  
  insert into LOCAL_TABLE
  Select / * + index_combine (alias_remote_tab IDX_LOG_DATE) * /.
  trunc (log_datetime),
  Count (*)
  of REMOTE_TABLE@DBLINK alias_remote_tab
  When trunc (log_datetime) = trunc(sysdate-1)
  Trunc Group (log_datetime);
  
  where:
  REMOTE_TABLE is a table partitioned on log_datetime (monthly)
  IDX_LOG_DATE is an index of bitmap of based on a valid function on log_datetime created in the trunc (log_datetime)
  local database: 10 gr 2
  remote database: 11 GR 1 material
  OS: windows (both)
  
  More funny thing is when I just run the select query independently on the only both local and remote, the index is used. I checked by printing the command explain for the select query plan. But when I prefix the query with the insert lose all hell breaks and local database plays the ignorance about the index. The command for the insert query explain plan has no mention of the index even when I explicitly place the index indicator in the select part of the query.
  
  If this should not be simple enough for ORACLE? Am I missing something here?

  Jonathan describes the details and the reasons for the behavior you see in following blog post http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/distributed-dml/
  Your SELECTION is performed remotely (filtering and grouping) and sends only the (relatively) small results via dblink local database while the in an INSERTION, filtering only occurs at the remote and data site (relatively) important are sent via dblink to the local database, the consolidation takes place.
  You can give a try to the approach proposed by michaels2. If the approach from the view result grouping and filtering which will take place in the remote database, you will see improved performance.

  PS BTW, if the sql code that I suggested to check the plane, in my previous post using an index, then the cause of your performance issue is certainly not due to the index not used and is due to the amount of data transferred to dblink.

• Attempt to initialize in a table of MAX alias throws an error on the first loop iteration.

  Hey people,

  I'll ttach a picture of what is in place now.

  I think the DELAY init that VI is ready to go for this application because I work in an another vi, but it is simply not applied in the same configuration of matrix/loop.

  However inside the vi init, I get an error of the Open VISA. (Only when I try to run the code in the loop at the top of the image mode).  Anyone of you guys do all that I'm missing here?   It's almost as if the string element (alias name) is not being indexed in place?

  Thanks for your time!

  -pat

  HA!

  I got to work with a very similar configuration to jpg #2 I posted.  It turns over the weekend, someone pulled the device with the IP address of the system.  You don't need to initialize an array of the parent as I did in the jpg however.

• Droping Materialized View but preserve its local table - Oracle 9i

  Hello gurus,

  How a drop views, materialized in 9i but would preserve the table?

  Thank you

  How a drop views, materialized in 9i but would preserve the table?

  Drop the MV will fall off the table unless the MV was created on a predefined table.

  If you have allowed the PARALLEL option, you can use the EXCHANGE PARTITION to swap the MV segment for a work with AN empty partition table.

  Then you can drop the MV and the (now empty) table.

  Create a standard table, and then reuse the EXCHANGE PARTITION to swap in the work table data segment.

• Overview of Oracle does not not a local table

  Hello
  
  The situation is:
  
  USRA - contains view_sample using table_sample. Also, view_sample has a public synonym on it.
  USRB - contains table_sample.
  
  Problem: When I connect using USRB and run + "select * from view_sample"+, it uses USRA.table_sample and not USRB.table_sample. "
  
  Please notify.

  user4746186 wrote:
  Let me think 2 options and test it. I was hoping for more on the lines of no structural change and work with synonyms only.

  It won't work, it will not work.

  A view cannot be compiled and validated on A table and then refer to a different table when he is questioned.

  Just because you know the tables were created with the same structure and given the same name, is not the same table. They are different. In different database tables can and will have different structures, data, privileges etc., so a view cannot share the table with reliability, it was created in reference to another table running.

• Initialization of a local Variable (variable uninitialized perhaps, but it is initialized?)

  I have behaviors very weird with my code. Some error messages complaining about reference uninitialized variables has led me to search around and found out that the shareware I use has very little initialization of local variables. CVI gives warning of the compiler on these variables, and I don't think he has caught even near each other. I went through the whole file and initialized everything myself.

  Even after that I booted my variables, however, the compiler always indicates they are unitialized, and my code still does not work. I've attached a screen of warnings from the compiler as well as one of the problem functions. Note that in the first warning (36, 9 WARNING: variable '(*tw1).i' maybe is not initialized when used here) there two notes under it, the one who told me where the variable is declared and who says "1, 1 Note: Add initialization to silence this warning. When I double-click on that note, he points to the top of the file, as if he says me to initialize the variable outside the function.

  I also found a very similar post about this but the user has said they were defining the structure twice.

  http://forums.NI.com/T5/LabWindows-CVI/local-array-initializations-not-recognized/m-p/2638119/highli...

  In addition, I understand that the screenshot I've not yet initialized the members of the struct, which I intend to do once that I get rid of these warnings.

  What should I do to remove this error? Any help is greatly appreciated, I've been messing around with this for too long. Thank you!

  emoser,

  I think that the strange warning is due to a bug in the analysis of the variables uninitialized in the compiler. The inaccurate diagnostic tests is issued at the line where you set a variable of local pointer to structure kiss_fft_cpx. It seems that the warning is caused during the pointer variable declaration is immediately followed by a local declaration of a structure of the same type:

  kiss_fft_cpx * tw1 = NULL;

  kiss_fft_cpx t;

  Basically, the incorrect diagnosis will happen:

  1. If a local pointer to a typedef struct variable is followed by a statement of the same variable type.
  2. If the second local variable declaration is not initialized.
  3. It doesn't matter if the pointer variable is initialized or not.

  The bug can come because the compiler can guess that the region of memory in the data segment continues from the pointer variable through the definition of the second variable, because they are of the same base type. A possible workaround in your case would be to go to the declaration of the variables of the same type (in your case, the declaration of the variable t) before the declaration of the pointer:

  kiss_fft_cpx t;

  kiss_fft_cpx * tw1 = NULL;

  Fortunately, this problem is fixed in the latest version of 2015 LabWindows/CVI.

  I hope this helps. I would like to know if the workaround works for you.

  Best regards!

  -Johannes

• error of initialization of the local db

  Hello

  on Siebel 8.1.1.8 I get the following errors when you attempt to initialize the local promoter database:

  Error: Directory/Fs/att, / Fs2/att, att/Fs3 / does not exist.

  SBL-DCK-00179: could not establish the synchronization with the server session.

  Before that, I have successfully completed the following steps:

  -Add the user for mobile Siebel remote

  -generate new models of db

  -extract from the database

  -check that all the components of Siebel remotely are in Active state

  Once I have start Siebel Tools with the data source local and allow the tools to connect remotely to Siebel, I get the mentioned error.

  
  

  It is a Siebel File System company parameter with the value "/Fs/att, / Fs2/att, att/Fs3 / ' and these directories exist on the application server. Where else should be created?

  Please suggest, what don't get me.

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  Check if the local database initialization works by connecting the computer to the developer with a domain account. Check the Doc ID 483574.1 on My Oracle Support to find additional information.

  It will be useful,

  WSiebel

• Select local (tmp) Table in function-> Table not found

  Hello

  I want to create a cursor that selects from a Table that does not exist in the database.

  I have create this table in local table (what is that called? nested table?).

  Not shown in the code but I want to fill this local array later.

  After completing my cursor is going to use this full table.

  When trying to launch I get the error Table or view does not exist in the 'FROM T1 TempTab_var;"my slider.

  This is my simplified code:

  CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION PC_RL_MTA_PMT
  RETURN PC_RL_MTA_TYPE_PMT
  IS
  result_out PC_RL_MTA_TYPE_PMT;
  
    TYPE TempTab_record_type IS RECORD
      (ID int);
  
    TYPE TempTab_type IS TABLE OF TempTab_record_type
            INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
  
    TempTab_var TempTab_type;
    
    
    CURSOR TempCursor3_var IS
      SELECT    ID AS ID_var
      FROM    TempTab_var T1;
  
  BEGIN
  RETURN result_out;
    
  END PC_RL_MTA_PMT;

  Any ideas what is wrong?

  Thank you very much in advance.

  And another example of my library of examples, just for you troubleshoot...

  SQL > CREATE or REPLACE TYPE AS OBJECT num_descript (num number, descript varchar2 (30))
  2.

  Type of creation.

  SQL > CREATE or REPLACE TYPE tbl_num_descript AS TABLE OF THE num_descript
  2.

  Type of creation.

  SQL > CREATE or REPLACE PACKAGE AS-reftest
  2 FUNCTION pipedata (number p_choice) tbl_num_descript RETURN PIPELINED;
  3 END;
  4.

  Package created.

  SQL > CREATE or REPLACE PACKAGE BODY AS-reftest
  2 FUNCTION pipedata (number p_choice) tbl_num_descript RETURN PIPELINED IS
  3 v_obj num_descript: = num_descript (NULL, NULL);
  4 v_rc sys_refcursor;
  5 BEGIN
  6. IF p_choice = 1 THEN
  7 v_rc OPEN to SELECT empno as num, ename like descript FROM emp;
  8 ELSIF p_choice = 2 THEN
  9 OPEN v_rc to SELECT deptno as num, dname as descript OF THE Department;
  10 END IF;
  11 LOOP
  12 FETCH v_rc INTO v_obj.num, v_obj.descript;
  EXIT 13 WHEN v_rc % NOTFOUND;
  14 PIPE ROW (v_obj);
  15 END LOOP;
  16 v_rc NARROW;
  RETURN 17;
  18 END;
  END 19;
  20.

  Package body created.

  SQL > select * from table (reftest.pipedata (1));

  DESCRIPT NUM
  ---------- ------------------------------
  7369 SMITH
  7499 ALLEN
  7521 WARD
  7566 JONES
  7654 MARTIN
  7698 BLAKE
  7782 CLARK
  7788 SCOTT
  KING 7839
  7844 TURNER
  7876 ADAMS
  JAMES 7900
  7902 FORD
  7934 MILLER

  14 selected lines.

  SQL > select * from table (reftest.pipedata (2));

  DESCRIPT NUM
  ---------- ------------------------------
  10 ACCOUNTING
  SEARCH 20
  30 SALES
  40 OPERATIONS

• Insert the output of a refcursor procedure into a table

  Hello
  
  I met a scenario in which I need to put the insert records returned by a procedure using refcursor, at a table.
  
  I followed the instructions in PL/SQL 101: understanding Refcursor (PL/SQL 101: understanding Ref Cursor am unfortunately still not able to do so.)
  
  Here is my sample codes. (Copied here as advised by the new Member)
  

  create or replace PROCEDURE TEST_PROCEDURE1 ( p_cursor OUT SYS_REFCURSOR)
  AS
  BEGIN
  OPEN p_cursor FOR
  SELECT C1,C2
  FROM TEST_USER.test_table4procedure;
  END;

  I check the result using the following statement, which gives results.
  

  variable rc refcursor;
  exec TEST_USER.TEST_PROCEDURE1 (:rc)
  print rc;

  Now, I want to be able to use the output and insert the data into a table. That's how I came across this thread.
  
  I created the types and function...
  

  create or replace type test_user.type_table1 as object(var1 varchar2(50),var2 varchar2(50));
  create or replace type test_user.type_table2 as table of test_user.type_table1;
  
  create or replace function test_user.test_function1 (rc in sys_refcursor )
  return test_user.type_table2 is
  v_emptype test_user.type_table2 := test_user.type_table2(); -- Declare a local table structure and initialize it
  v_cnt number := 0;
  v_rc sys_refcursor;
  v_var1 varchar2(20);
  v_var2 varchar2(20);
  begin
  v_rc := rc;
  loop
  fetch v_rc into v_var1, v_var2;
  exit when v_rc%NOTFOUND;
  v_emptype.extend;
  v_cnt := v_cnt + 1;
  v_emptype(v_cnt) := test_user.type_table1(v_var1, v_var2);
  end loop;
  close v_rc;
  return v_emptype;
  end;

  After that, I want to be able to view the records by using the function... so I used the instructions below...
  

  variable rc refcursor;
  exec TEST_USER.TEST_PROCEDURE1 (:rc)
  SELECT * FROM TABLE(test_user.test_function1(:rc));   

  However, it fails with the error
  
  Error from line 3 in order:
  SELECT * FROM TABLE (test_user.test_function1 (:rc))
  Error report:
  SQL error: Missing a setting IN or OUT to index: 1
  
  Help, please...

  Your code does not work for a simple reason. SYS_REFCURSOR parameters must be in IN OUT mode. Check if the RC is open when he switched mode:

  create or replace type type_table1 as object(var1 varchar2(50),var2 varchar2(50))
  /
  create or replace type type_table2 as table of type_table1
  /
  create or replace PROCEDURE TEST_PROCEDURE1 (p_cursor IN OUT SYS_REFCURSOR)
  AS
  BEGIN
  OPEN p_cursor FOR
  SELECT ENAME,JOB FROM EMP;
  END;
  /
  create or replace function test_function1 (rc in sys_refcursor )
  return type_table2 is
  v_emptype type_table2 := type_table2(); -- Declare a local table structure and initialize it
  v_cnt number := 0;
  v_var1 varchar2(20);
  v_var2 varchar2(20);
  begin
  if rc%isopen
    then
      dbms_output.put_line('rc is open');
    else
      dbms_output.put_line('rc is not open');
   end if;
  loop
  fetch rc into v_var1, v_var2;
  exit when rc%NOTFOUND;
  v_emptype.extend;
  v_cnt := v_cnt + 1;
  v_emptype(v_cnt) := type_table1(v_var1, v_var2);
  end loop;
  close rc;
  return v_emptype;
  end;
  /
  variable rc refcursor
  exec TEST_PROCEDURE1(:rc)
  set serveroutput on
  SELECT * FROM TABLE(test_function1(:rc))
  /
  SELECT * FROM TABLE(test_function1(:rc))
                      *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-01001: invalid cursor
  ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.TEST_FUNCTION1", line 15
  
  rc is not open
  SQL> 
  

  Now IN OUT parameter edit mode:

  set serveroutput off
  create or replace function test_function1 (rc in out sys_refcursor )
  return type_table2 is
  v_emptype type_table2 := type_table2(); -- Declare a local table structure and initialize it
  v_cnt number := 0;
  v_var1 varchar2(20);
  v_var2 varchar2(20);
  begin
  if rc%isopen
    then
      dbms_output.put_line('rc is open');
    else
      dbms_output.put_line('rc is not open');
   end if;
  loop
  fetch rc into v_var1, v_var2;
  exit when rc%NOTFOUND;
  v_emptype.extend;
  v_cnt := v_cnt + 1;
  v_emptype(v_cnt) := type_table1(v_var1, v_var2);
  end loop;
  close rc;
  return v_emptype;
  end;
  /
  variable rc refcursor
  exec TEST_PROCEDURE1(:rc)
  set serveroutput on
  declare
  v_emptype type_table2 := type_table2();
  begin
  v_emptype := test_function1(:rc);
  end;
  /
  rc is open
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> 
  

  Problem is that you can't call the procedure/function with parameters in/out OUT of SQL.

  SY.

• Records of the initialization of the array of strings

  Hello. I posted my project. It's not even close to finished, but I have a problem during the initialization of the table entitled 'values' and 'down of values', '0' for all elements, at the beginning of the Vi run. So, when I'm at the front and execution of the Vi, I would that all fields begin with a '0', the moment that the Vi is started. I tried a few different things, I could think and watched video 1 base on the tables again, however, it does not give the example of a string and nothing I have tried so far, works. Thank you.

  Filling of the indicators with default values is not very useful, because they will be overwritten once the program is running and updated indicators. In general, the default values are much more useful for controls.

  In any case, if you want indicators to reset the defaults, every execution of the VI, go to ' properties VI... execution "and check"of clear indicators when it is called.

  See if that fixes your perceived problem. Good luck!

• place memory safe table

  Hello.

  I work with an array of "big", and I would like to know if I'm just doing.

  I am given concatenation (SGL) on my program and with him, build a larger painting each iteration of the loop. I calculated that I need a table with about 200000 points. If I'm right, this isn't good at worked with a shift register, because if the table is larger each iteration Labview urechi new table every time. So, what I do is initialize an array with 200000 points NaN and after he fill it with a constant =. Its this right?

  Thank you

  Hey Navarro,

  initialization of a table prior to the size correct (or necessary) is recommended.

  Case 'period': delete this table later by replacing it with a blank matrix constant is nonsense.

  Case 'save': adding new items to your table is a nonsense - why you initialize it before?

  Use InitArray with ReplaceArrayElements!

• What is the best way to change the elements of the array (without copies of the table)?

  Hi all

  I am new to Labview, so I'm sorry for the newbie question.

  I'm using Labview check parts in an assembly as a precursor to the test. For my 'list' I create an array of clusters, with the cluster containing a string for the part number and a Boolean value if the latter has been analyzed. I read in my parts list, and then I add on behalf of the party to each cluster in the table. I don't want to do multiple table if possible copies. The code below does not work - I've had the 'matrix' (my Checklist) outside the while loop, because I assumed that the box of items inplace should not output. The cluster created in the inplace elements is correct, but the 'picture' does not change.

  

  Any help woud be appreciated, I would have preferred a simpler solution elements inplace if possible (once again without making multiple copies).

  Concerning

  Ray

  You do not show the rest of the code, but I'm guessing that your "matrix" is never initialized with all values. Thus, 'replace' will not work since you can't replace an element that does not exist. If the case you are showing is supposed to be the initialization of the table (and based on what you say, it seems as if this is the case), and then abandon the inplace structure. All you need to do is automatic index of your array of strings and just do this: