Integration of Cisco ACS and Cisco NAC Manager - downloadable ACLs

Similar Questions

• Hi everyone, Q: no matter what I do I install Muse in English, and the cloud Manager downloaded in Dutch, other programs are installed in English but Muse, reasonable please help.

  Hi everyone, Q: no matter what I do I install Muse in English, and the cloud Manager downloaded in Dutch, other programs are installed in English but Muse, reasonable please help.

  You can change the interface language user in Muse by throwing Muse and no .muse file opened, go to preferences and select the new language. Then quit and restart Muse for the language change to take full effect.

• Why ACS can not display page downloadable ACLs

  Hello

  I have a GBA for windows, version 4.0.1.27.

  After successful installation, I found there is not point of downloadable ACLs in the shared component profile? I can see his support on the right place.

  Why not configure downloadable ACLs in this ACS, y at - it all the other work I have to do?

  THX

  Hello

  Try this.

  Configuration of the interface-> Advanced Options

  Click the check box for

  Download ACL user level

  Group and level downloadable ACLs

  Click on submit

  Then go back to the shared profile components and it should now be an option.

  HTH

  Jon

• 3005 integrated VPN with ACS and server RSA auth

  Hi guys, I have a VPN 3005, using the version 4.7.2.B version, and I have the following problem.

  When a remote user using the Cisco VPN client tries to connect to the VPN 3005, it must try twice to authenticate.

  The first test, the user is authenticated, but the connection is immediately undermined by the peer.

  After the second attempt, the user is authenticated ok.

  Pablo,

  When you use RADIUS authentication on the hub, the ACS server will automatically send all the attributes of the user towards the concentrator for the user who is connecting. There is no need to have the authorization to be configured on the RADIUS server.

  According to the newspapers, it looks like the IP pool is the problem.

  [GroupP] user group [tuser] obtained IP addr (192.168.32.128) before launching the Cfg Mode (active XAuth)

  Subnet mask of the user [tuser] sending [GroupP] (255.255.255.224) group to the remote client

  User group [GroupP] [tuser] attempt to assign network or broadcast IP address, remove (192.168.32.128) of the

  After that, I see the customer negotiation again and the client is connected.

  Thus, the IP address is removed from the pool. Please make sure that you set up a pool that does not have a broadcast IP address.

  Thank you

  Gilbert

  Write it down, if this post can help.

• Integration Microsoft DevStudio 2010 and VMware Lab Manager

  Microsoft DevStudio 2010 seems to provide a nice integration in a virtualized environment of laboratory course using their own hypervisor. What is VMware plan to integrate this? Someone else began to focus on the integration yet? In order to manage isolated networks, they seem to have a lab test controller talking agents, so different test agents in the "closed" configurations can easily be found out.

  I already have a wind front of genius as far as my current LM infrastructure goes.

  Microsoft plans to add support for ESX by SP1 environment according to their team. How that factors in Lab Manager I don't know. In addition, their installation on the hypervisor isn't exactly great. It requires the VM already be made by hand. So there is no, automagic dpeloy the VM to test cancel them the deployment when done. So from what we have seen, it seems to not integrate yet. I found it very disappointing. However, they have the facilites for before and after series of tests shares. So our next step is to see if you use the API we can deploy and Undeploy of an image of Lab Manager and pass through the IP address of the machine newly deployed to the Test Manager. It should work, but we have not begun to this topic but, as we always try to make sure that we understand everything that happens in the process of the hypervisor.

• Cisco Security Manager integration with Cisco ACS troubleshooting

  Hi all!

  I have a problem with the integration between Cisco Security Manager and ACS. I've done the integration, but the identity of the user system doesn't have enough privileges. I know what the problem is, but I don't know how I can change the login of the ACS to the local MSC?

  I found a file that specifies the following:

  Q.

  Is there a backend script or command line interface options to change the ACS to local CicsoWorks connection module?

  A.

  To restore the server LMS ACS local user mode mode, stop the CiscoWorks

  demons and run the following script:

  NMSROOT/bin/perl ResetLoginModule.pl

  (for Solaris)

  NMSROOT\bin\perl ResetLoginModule.pl

  (for Windows)

  Then, restart the daemon.

  I did it, but does not work, any idea?

  Hello

  I guess you can try to go through the question on WSC and GBA integration troubleshooting:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/security_management/cisco_security_manager/security_manager/3.0/troubleshooting/guide/rbacts.html#wp1043629

  Few things might have gone wrong:

  1 - this command must be run on the server MCS cmd prompt (make sure that you are not on the client computer)

  2 - NMSROOT is the directory were MSC Server is installed. Is usually c:\Progra~1\CSCOpx

  3. you must stop the deamon Manager before performing this action (and restart)

  For example if the directory is the one above to reset the connection locally, you can try the following:

  net stop crmdmgtd---> that stops the daemon Manager (can be done by the services window)

  c:\Progra~1\CSCOpx\bin\perl c:\Progra~1\CSCOpx\bin\ ResetLoginModule.pl---> restores local authentication

  net start crmdmgtd---> restart the Daemon Manager

  Can you maybe try again and let me know how it goes?

  Thank you

• What is the difference between Cisco NAC and ACS?

  I am currently part of a new construction project and my Cisco account manager and sales engineer recommend Cisco NAC for our new MDF. I'm confused because I don't clearly know the difference between a Cisco ACS and the NAC. What is the difference?

  Thank you

  Chris

  Chris,

  The two are completely different, maybe the sales rep could present you with more information and application. Each offers a variety of services tailored to the specific needs. I think that we need to read more in depth on the proceeds of the NAC. NAC seems an excellent solution for authentication authorization but other regulatory compliance.

  When you see ask your representative to sales for more information/demo.

  ACS is more widely use as a central point to access control to network devices routers, an example is for acs accounting management and the authority to order on all devices on the network using acs as RADIUS server. Considering that the NAC is over a central point of safety inspection on earlier systems of access to your network by via LAN or outside, an example of these respected regulatory defined could be inspections could be virus definition checks before getting lan access thus preventing access to the LAN if the system does not have regulatory compliance defined in NAC access is denied. Another example could be the unknown local host connections etc... So, it seems that NAC is a much broader product that provides endpoint security internal, not only the authentication authorization as acs... ACS has been there for a long time, NAC is rather new product.

  NAC

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/NetSol/ns466/networking_solutions_package.html

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns394/ns171/ns466/ns617/net_qanda0900aecd800fdd6f_ns466_Networking_Solutions_Q_and_A.html

  ACS

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps5338/index.html

  Rgds

  Jorge

• Base installation of Cisco NAC

  Hello

  I bought a Cisco NAC server and a Cisco NAC Manager.  I have it in the laboratory to test for the moment, but I would extend approximately 200 users possibly on campus lan.  I just check that a user is valid on active directory.  Perhaps the best way I can do that is by making a discovery on the server of the NAC to valid mac addresses.

  What is the best way to do this? That is to say

  user connects to a port on the campus lan

  Active directory checks that they are a valid user on the domain

  they get their usual dhcp address once they are authenticated

  If they are not a user validates on the field that they will not be authenticated

  I'm not worried about the verification of the antivirus, pc built... for now

  For the moment, I installed the server of the NAC and the NAC Manager and both can access it through a layer 3 switch.

  Thank you

  Kevin

  Kevin,

  Essentially, you ask for advice on how to do this. As I just pulled out of 1000 users NAC L2 VG OOB (who looks like, it's what you want to do) and a 3000user of the NAC L3 RIP OOB as well as OOB wirless and looking IB VPN right now. My best advice would be to buy the next book.

  Cisco NAC Appliance 'Host security with clean Access Application' by James Heary for about $60. (available on Amazon)

  This covers all deployment scenarios and is invaluable for me when I created the NAC. What it does is put in the necessary steps and is easier than flitting back and forth between the CAM and CASE manual.

  Hope that helps

• Cisco NAC features?

  Hello

  I noticed that there are some features in my v4.7.2 Cisco NAC Manager of production? Can someone explain to me briefly what I can do with these features;

  1. What can a Network Scanner in the title of the device management > own access, in do CAM? This feature will focus on my network more away?

  2. I noticed that to add rules of traffic under the management of the users control > CAM user roles, is easy, assuming that I have many roles, but to remove them, I have to do this one by one. Is this statement true or false?

  Kind regards

  RAM

  + 6-0122918870

  Hi Ram,

  The scanner add overhead to the network. Plugins more you add, the more support there.

  Nessus scan is really not possible in academia. Scanning requires administrative access to the machines and the customer firewall allowing traffic from the clean access server. It's much more plausible in a managed desktop scenario.

  You're right about the deletion rules, there is no way to support no way to make a deletion block at this time.

  Hope that helps.

  Cordially, Jeremy

• Cisco ACS 5.1 and RSA Authentication Manager 6.1

  Hi all

  We recently had a Cisco Secure ACS 1120 and I improved the Unit 5.1 5.0 with all your support

  Now, I need to integrate Cisco ACS 5.1 with RSA Authentication Manager 6.1. I have config file of RSA ACE Server successfully downloaded and exported to 1120 ACS.

  I also added as NetOS Agent ACS in the RSA server during the process, I found a few warnings. The ACE Server is not able to resolve the IP address to the name (is it necessary?).

  I have not created any file of secret key for communication between FAC and RSA and I used encryption is FOR.

  Now, when I log into ACS and search for devices in the identity store sequences I am not able to get Sever Token RSA.

  Let me know what was wrong, where can I fix and also please tell me what is the communciaction between the RSA and ACS?

  Hoping that you guys help me as usual when I'm in a hurry...

  Sree

  Were you able to successfully create the RSA identity server. After selecting the sdconf.rec and you press on submit what happened? The RSA instance created OK?

  If you go to

  Users and identity stores > external identity stores > RSA SecurID Token servers, what do you see in the list?

• I would like to implement Cisco Security Manager demo and requirement, I have about 500 devices

  I want to implement Cisco Security Manager .demo and requirement, I have about 500 aircraft and which is sutabale also want to access VPN management

  And what is your question?

• 1 box of Cisco Content Management Appliance come Cisco and Cisco WSA RSES.

  Hi all

  I have a question about Cisco Content Management Appliance, could you please help me check the answer.

  My client asked me if they could use a box of management to manage devices ASO and ESA.

  For example, I have 1 box C380 ESA and 1 box WSA S380. Can I use 1 box M380 to manage both of them.

  Thanks for your help.

  Vinh Phan.

  Hello Vinh,

  Yes, you can manage the ESA and the WSA with the same box M380.

  Source:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/security/content-security-management-appliance/index.html

  "The ADM of Cisco simplifies administration by publishing from a single to multiple email security appliances and web configurations Cisco management console"

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• difference between cisco NAC agent and cisco Clean Access Agent

  Hi all

  If anyone has the idea on different between cisco NAC agent and cisco Clean Access Agent, please let us know your ideas.

  Thank you

  In 4.6, the agent has been revised and is now called the NAC agent.  Previous versions were called the clean access Agent.  So roughly, 4.5 and 4.1.3.2 agent are own access agents, and agents 4.6.x and 4.7.x are called NAC agents.

  Some of the changes are moving a lot of the agent configuration in an XML file, redesign of the GUI, adding a service portion (of the sort that the agent of heel is no longer necessary) and the best journaling agent.

• Cisco NAC server and check active number? Would this work?

  Hi all

  A client has achieved a question when we introduced Cisco NAC today.  They wondered, lets say, a client of Cisco NAC agent installed may be connected to the network switch. It has all valid requests and patch levels on his machine (posture validation check pass)

  However, even if the customer takes the position of all the parameters, they want to know that if the host name of the client (for most Windows laptops) does not exist in their active database (this database is a database of estate number which is in a similar format or .csv) posture validation must fail.

  Have you met such request like this before? Is there a function on the NAC server which checks a field against an external database as an active database?

  See you soon.

  Dumlu,

  Currently, it is not possible. You can create controls who can check values locally, but not against external data warehouses, so for this card against your thinking, NAC would have to know all the names of workstation before hand and then check against that. It is unwieldy and very very difficult to scale.

  If it's something you and your client think would be a good addition (and it sounds like a good idea) Please engage with your account team and ask them to request a feature for you.

  Thank you

  Faisal

• Cisco NAC discovered host field use OOB L3 and L2 OOB

  Hi all

  We are in the phase of project initiation in a huge deployment of Cisco NAC.

  Customer has of 8 regional offices who will be deployed in OOB L2 mode with its own servers of NAC.

  Client also As 25 small offices who will be deployed in OOB L3 mode (using the access control list) with two central servers of the NAC.

  NAC agent will be deployed at the Center through Microsoft Windows Domain Services on each computer in the domain. However, users could move from a small office to a regional office occasionally.

  I was wondering how we should use the Host field discovered in the XML of the Agent?

  My opinion is the definition of the scope of the host of the discovery to the IP address of the central servers of the NAC. This setting will be used when the user is in a small office and when in an office regional, the NAC in mode OOB L2 server will already intercept the traffic of the user and the IP address in the host discovery field won't matter in this case?

  Am I wrong?
  Any help much appreciated.

  Dumlu

  Hi Dumlu,

  If your concern relates to users of L2, then this will work regardless of the address of the configured host discovery.

  This is the case, the Agent will try the host address configured discovered on top of the default gateway address.

  In L2, the NAC server is between the host and the default gateway, so the L2 discovery process will still work.

  Consider that for users of L3, the discovery packet sent to the discovered host address just reach the server of the ANC, no matter if so the agent can reach this address; the point is to ensure that the NAC server receives this package in order to meet with the NAC server specific info.

  I hope that answers your question.

  Kind regards

  Federico

  --

  If this answers your question please mark the question as "answered" and write it down, so other users can easily find it.