interlaced

Similar Questions

• How to export a mpg2 Pal interlaced widescreen

  I am in the Panel video in compressor 4.2.2 but proportions and deposited are not editable, I cannot select widescreen and intertwined. How can I do? Video source is a progressive 1920x1080p, I need to esports, a large display of interlaced Pal.

  Thank you

  

  Robbie, change the Frame Rate of 25 automatic, and it will allow you to choose interlaced. Compressor will recognize the report l / h f your source as wide screen and make adjustments to the MPEG file to keep it on the big screen at the poster.

  Russ

• ProRes 422 always interlaced "Interleaved fields?

  When FCP X converts 1080i50 sequences of a Canon Legria HF R16 "optimized media" he records them as "interlaced fields", but uses the original film "separated fields" (interlaced, high-field first of all, in both cases).

  Is this normal (i.e.: ProRes 422 always use 'interlaced fields' for interlaced), or something is wrong during transcoding?

  Same thing with iMovie last as well.

  Ensure that what you are trying to say. Interlaced frames are not considered separately. Two interlaced fields make up a single image.

• Sony Action Cam (AS30) interlacing artifacts during the progressive record?

  Hello

  Recently bought a Sony AS30 Action Cam and I'm having withdrawal issues interlaced frames. After research last week, I came to understand what seems to be the Enigma of Pal/NTSC...

  I come from a Pal region, but I also tried recording NTSC to see if this sorts the question. Tried also record 30 p and 30 720 p. If I understand correctly 1080 60 p means that the video is saved progressive (full frame) at 60 frames per second? Why would suffer a (tooth mouse) comb effect during playback on my pc.

  Hello Emmanuelle,

  Could you post the specifications of your computer, especially the graphics card and the monitor you are using. It may have something to do with the overall specifications of the computer that is why he only video interlaced offer rather than progressive.

• Is there a quick and easy way to rearrange the data off interlaced?

  I collect 5 channels of data through a FIFO DMA by interlacing, then save them in a PDM file. When I check it, it is in good condition for the most part, but there are some points where the channels get switched. For example, channel order when I open the file is 1 2 3 4 5, as expected, for the thousands of several elements. But at some point, he gets 4 5 1 2 3 and later 2 3 4 5 1. Left to right, they are always classified correctly, so it is easy to rearrange them, but very painful along with millions of elements. I have attached some examples of data. I'm looking for A) a way to prevent this or B) some kind of sorting tool or script in DIAdem or LabVIEW can sort for me. I'll work on a scenario of sorting in the meantime.

  I use 2011 LabVIEW Real-time and FPGA 2011 and the standard open and write TDMS functions. I also have access to tiara.

  Seems to me that the problem is that you do not remove the elements of the FIFO in multiples of your number of channels.  Array decimate returns always arrays of equal length.  If the size of the input array is not a multiple of the number of tables of output, it falls out of the elements, and that's where you lose data.  You must round down the number of elements to read to the nearest multiple of the number of channels - I would insert a "Quotient and remainder" function with the divisor as the number of channels and subtract the rest by the number of items.

• Interlaced Image machine vision

  Hello

  I would like to combine interlaced image fields so that the resulting image has all the fields (odd and even) filled. I use CWIMAQVision.InterlaceSeparate to separate even and odd fields and use CWIMAQVision.InterlaceCombine to fill in the missing fields. I'm afraid that it will not give me the desired result, because the missing field is only replaced by the even or odd field values. I would replace the obtained field field missing with interpolated values above and below the missing field values. Is there a way to do this?

  Kind regards.

  Poop Majid

  I misunderstood what you are trying to do, or you missed a step.  Here is my suggestion more in detail:

  Start with an interlaced image, 640 x 480.

  Deinterlacing to get an odd field (640 x 240) and the same field (640 x 240).

  Choose a field and resampling can interpolate to 640 x 480.  It will be the double of the dimension Y of the image.

  No you ask?  If this isn't the case, please explain further what you are trying to do.

  Bruce

• API 5, "interlace synchronization.

  I wrote a complex application that executes a browserfield2 as a layout engine and overload of links with various native functions, but I'm quite often an error JVM "interlaced synchronization. Any ideas? My code:

         _bf2 = new BrowserField();
          _controller = new ProtocolController(_bf2) {
              public void handleNavigationRequest(final BrowserFieldRequest request) throws Exception {
                  // invokeLater(new Runnable() {
                  //    public void run() {
                  try {
                      if (request.getPostData() != null)
                          _postData = new String(request.getPostData());
                      loadPage(request.getURL(), false); // this function will call Browser.handle().safeSetText(screen.getHtml(), screen.getTitle(), screen.getUrl());
                  } catch (Throwable e) {
                      safeSetText(e.getMessage(), "Error: ", request.getURL() + "|1|" + e.getMessage() + "|2|" + e.toString());
                      TimeDialog.handle().hideDialog();
                  }
                  //    }
                  // });
              }
          };
          _bfConfig.setProperty(BrowserFieldConfig.CONTROLLER, _controller);
          add(_bf2);
      }
  
      public final void safeSetText(final String data, final String title, final String baseUrl) {
          synchronized (UiApplication.getApplication().getEventLock()) {
              setTitle( title );
              _bf2.displayContent(data, baseUrl);
          }
          TimeDialog.handle().hideDialog();
      }
  

  Is not the correct way to set the contents of a browserfield2? (I download the contents manually to first analyze the XML and extract the html part). Thanks in advance!

  Just to add my $0.02:

  Some synchronization occurs within the native BlackBerry code, the equivalent of the "system calls".  I've seen interlaced synchronization going on inside the call to SimpleDateFormat.format (Object).  Some of these things may be beyond your control.  However, it is only when these calls are inside your own synchronized block that deadlock can occur.

  So, it would be the main Board - know why you sync (which global data you want to protect) and have only the code that you must absolutely protect (without any blocking calls!) inside the braces.

  Oh, and as a programmer incorporated with 10 years of experience in this field, I must tell you - if a synchronization problem peut happens, it 's going to happen. Loud sounds, but it is true.

• Ghost images between cuts to export after the edition of interlaced images

  Hello

  When I change a few sequences in the order that are defined to be interlaced and I do some changes specific to the source, I find myself with a few images of 'ghosts' arise between cuts in export. However these ghost images are visible only in vlc and other external drives. If I import export in PP, there will be no ghost image to be seen.

  Here is the link to an example: http://www.doublesens.tv/media/05A-SONORE%20GUINEE_1.mp4

  And a screenshot of him:

  

  I tried export ff upper, lower, gradual changes, nothing. I tried also to manually select the progressive in the "film" for the source dialog box. Nope.

  The only thing that works is the edition of progressive sequences, even when the material is interlaced.

  Looks like a bug. What do you think? What I lose something when I change in a progressive sequence with interlaced source and export?

  Thank you very much.

  vilrockerdefer wrote:

  ... these ghost images are visible in vlc and other external drives. If I import export in PP, there will be no ghost image to be seen.

  If you change in an interlaced sequence, the program monitor is set to display two fields?

  

  If you use the interlaced source material and mounted on an interlaced timeline, must match the domination of the field in the source and chronology.

  In addition, the source of the layer footage has been copied (from the band, for example) or is it original camera film? I've seen cases where interlaced images has been incorrectly dubbed and this problem - the cutoff point showing the scene of outgoing on the ground one and the incoming field scene two of the frame - has occurred.

  If this is the case, the only solution is to drag edit them points.

  MtD

• Rendering of 1080 videos resemble 540 resampled or interlaced half frame.

  Hello

  Newbie to Premiere Pro.  Not a newbie to computers and to the media.

  
  I work mainly digital image and CG, very few video source, so this isn't a problem of interlaced/progressive source.
  Much of the content is 1920 x 1080 PNG images and sequential images PNG output 3ds Max etc.

  During the creation of new projects, the sequence is made up to 1920 x 1080, square pixels (1.0), no fields (Progressive Scan).

  Then export that I use AVI codec None so that it is uncompressed, Custom, also with 1920 x 1080 pixel square (1.0), number fields (Progressive Scan), 30 images/s, 24-bit, quality 100, use maximum render quality.

  Each video or exported output single PNG image resembles a was reduced to horizontal and then used and then resized 540 to 1080 resampled file up to 1080, or as a single field.

  See the image as an attachment.

  Top of page text comes from a source PNG, text background is what first exports on.

  The word "content" is 100%, the 'e' on the right are maximized to 400%.

  Any ideas?  What I am doing wrong?  This cannot be correct.

  

  I tried a few other formats, and it is apparently the AVI format exporter.
  I do not get the odd vertical resample artifacts with other formats, I tried just quickly.

  I chose this format of configuration as a result of googling 'Export Format uncompressed first Pro CC' and that's what all the results of the research, said to use, I guess they were wrong.

  So no one bothers not using the same settings as see you in my above post, they do not work properly.
  I'll have to spend some time to determine what other format will give me uncompressed exports or better.

  Thank you all.

  * EDIT *.

  The formats 'AVI (uncompressed)' v210 and the "Quicktime" Uncompressed UYVY, all the work without the vertical resample glitch.

  The (uncompressed) AVI UYVY will play in Windows Media Player.  AVI v210 and QT will not.

  The v210 AVI (uncompressed) and UYVY will play in VLC video player.  The QT interval is not.

  A basic example of the size of the file is, a source of k 1 095:

  -non compressed QT of 1 096 k

  -AVI (uncompressed) v210 is 973 k (v210 = 4:2:2 10-bit AFAIK)

  -the UYVY (uncompressed) AVI is 730 k (UYVY = 4:2:2 8-bit AFAIK)
  Visually, all three are very good.  I guess the mov QT is the closest source according to file size.

  For intermediate / archive files of clips that I decided also to try the QuickTime GoPro CineForm RGBA 4:4:4:4 12 bits per channel codec.
  See the Adobe page: GoPro CineForm codec support in Premiere Pro

• How to check interlaced fields are in the right order?

  I made a DVD interlaced in first. When I look at the video back exported, interleaving doesn't seem to be in the correct order, but I can't tell for certain.

  Other than conjecture, is a good way to check for certain, that the fields are in the right order? My Media Player does not play an image all at once, and I can't study the individual fields.

  Also: If you had a project that combines two videos from the field source levels? The correct procedure would be to move one of the videos upwards or downwards a pixel?

  You can do that in first, by selecting the view field under the key in the program window.

• Distorted (interlaced?) look after export in AE CS6

  I'm working on AE CS6. My current images's photo of a model of plaid disguised as a .png. I need to zoom in the photo. The problem is when I export my project, the clothes on a model are completely distorted (interlaced?). I downloaded a sample on Youtube, so you can see, BUT in FACT Youtube converts somehow the way he seems pretty good: test - YouTube. But on a computer, video (on the clothing sector) is completely burrs and flickering, I can't give it to a customer like that.

  Here is a picture of the model of clothing that is causing the problem:

  

  I have already tried:

  -export to different formats

  -change project settings from 8 to 16 to 32 bits

  -"High-low field first" setting in the "Film" of a photo settings

  In all cases the result is the same. I also tried to export the same photo in Premiere Pro - and it is great, only AE has a problem... I need some help really fast here! THX!

  For the technical explanation and the physics behind the phenomenon, search for "memory" and the apparent visual artifacts created by the interaction of the frequencies that are out of phase. Your model of weaving has a frequency of white/black/white lines. The number of pixels in the video image, its frequency is also static. When are these Harmonic frequencies, the image is stable. When these frequencies shift phases at different rates as zoom you out, there is an interaction between them which produces patterns. As Myl. said, reduce you or eliminate not by changing the frequencies, but by changing the waveform. Now, you the waveforms are rigid, power. By softening of the waveform in a sine wave, you'll reduce interactions. You cannot change the waveform of the video if you apply a little blur to the armor.

• SOUL CC renders progressive (non-interlaced) AE projects

  Hi people,

  We have updated CC 2014.2 last week and are now blocked without fields - and as a broadcaster broadcasting we desperately need to 1080i interlaced files!

  Here´s details:

  For a fast template, I created a simple project of EI (CS6) with a blue bar around the Center.

  This same composition is open in CS6 and TEA 2014.2 SOUL and made with identical settings:

  

  It is the result of the CS6 SOUL:

  

  This is the result of the SOUL CC 2014.2

  

  During the last week, we did everything we could to convince SOUL 2014.2 to make fields - but we didn t succeed...

  The only solution is:

  1. Open the AE composition in PremierePro
  2. interpret as "upper field".
  3. Place it in a sequence
  4. Send this sequence to the SOUL

  Then SOUL makes interlaced...

  Note Please

  • I m not talking videomaterial interlaced or progressive but on field of animations AE handling himself in the SOUL
  • under "What / Source ' he said 'progressive', but you can´t change the interpretation on an AE composition
  • in SOUL CS6 this said "progressive" as well but that makes the fields
  • We tried with several different projects and compositions on different computers (PC and Mac)
  • scary: with rendering the same sources same parameters produced different files in SOUL CS6 vs SOUL 2014.2
  • It s not only the thing of field / progressive - 2014.2 SOUL mp4 files are half size of SOUL CS6

  Thanks for your help - we really need our back fields... ;-)

  Best regards

  Andreas Schletter

  Germany

  I just ran a test and here is what I found.

  Rendering of CC 2014 using the tail to return and separating the fields in the project panel give you an interleaved file. Rendering of the SOUL and by using h.264 you do not get a result interlaced, even if you check the box of the separate fields. I have also tried Jpeg2000 quicktime of TEA with the same result... none made progressive. I even tried to double the pace in the SOUL, once again no progressive rendering. The only way to get a progressive rendering in the latest version of the SOUL is by setting the frame rate of comp in AE to double the standard frame rate. In your example 50 frames per second.

  Here's how I test for interlacing.

  If the video is interlaced so there are different positions for your blue bar for each frame if you drag your film progressive in the new comp window, check that the model is the same rate as the frames (25 fps in your example) and that AE correctly interprets the images, and then double-click the rate of comp. If you ride in a model at a time, and each picture is different then you have interlaced images but it is interlaced without scanning empty lines. After effects has tried to fill these scanning lines as long as I can remember.

  Looks like it's a bug. I'll file a report and suggest you do the same thing. In the meantime, if you use the TEA to render deliverables then the solution is to double the pace in the model before you add it to the queue.

• An interlaced project can be exported as progressive? Loss of all or good quality?

  Would Premiere Elements automatically off interlaced it when exporting and is it well made? How is it? Much quality loss (if any)?

  I Pree 10 & 12 on 2 computers.

  Pbeck1

  If you have an HDTV, using the progressive scan. So if you have the interlaced video, TV technology will convert from interlaced to progressive assumed automatically. It is the traditional televisions, accompanying the interlace.

  The computer players go with the progressive scan. A player such as VLC Player computer runs with its disabled by default deinterlace filter. You can activate it is necessary, and it gives you a variety of methods to select from deinterlacing.

  https://wiki.videolan.org/deinterlacing

  As far as I know, Windows Media Player is the deinterlacing of interlaced automatically. I don't think that the user can control this situation.

  Regarding the Classsic of media player, I would need to check more but I think it works with default deinterlacing. But it can be adjustable by the user?

  Bottom line is that you rely on the player and its technology to determine the effectiveness of video deinterlacing for interlaced playback.

  If you have found the right view, go with it.

  RTA

• For interlaced video export settings

  Hello

  I'm looking to export a short film, shot entirely in first Pro 6 - with many effects like color correction.

  My images are 1080i 25 fps, once I have selected the preset under H.264 HD 1920x1080i 25 I get a standard set of adjustment, but my file comes to 4.2 GB. The VBR is set to 32 with max to 40.

  These are the best parameters determined? If I lowered the flow at 20, he lowers it to 2 GB, but I still have the same quality?

  Ive noticed too, interlaced does not work so well at the same time, if I were to export as fps will HD 1080p25 my video distorted?

  ID love of trial and error, but each makes it takes about 4 hours! (and that's with VBR 1 pass)

  In addition, I would like to export to Youtube and keep a copy on my PS3. I wouldn't mind the size, but as you know fat32 allows only 4 GB max to be transferred to a USB and PS3 is a Fat32 system if Im not transfer.

  Would you recommend a generic export or another for Youtube and my PS3... keeping in mind that it is a short (20 min)

  My recordings from cameras PAL to AVCHD to 21 Mbps or 28mbps in a progressive model.

  I tried the rise of the film completed at 30 with a maximum of 35 and also exported to 20.  Seen on a 55 '' tv or projected only shows no significant difference.

  The standard Youtube and Vimeo export presets work well for me, in general they export to 5 Mbps.

  PS, I would export more precisely at the maximum rate that you can get over on your PS export

  Col

• The interlaced images editing and get rid of the twitter

  Hi - my client has his images shot in an analog installation access by the public.  He wants me to edit images.  The studio exports the 4:3 of interlacing images.

  I did everything I could do to find a way to get rid of the twitter.  See below:

  

  Here is a screenshot of the export settings:

  

  When I read the images on my computer, twitter is not too bad, but when I downloaded a test YouTube clip, which is where all of his videos will be, twitter is very bad:

  http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=axUs95_MEwI & feature = youtu.be

  So I'm to understand that.  I use Adobe Premiere CS4 to do this work.  Any help is appreciated.  Thank you.

  Wow it's great.