is prpro made to use all 8 cores of my quad-core processor

I have a new i7 - 2600 k processor, asus p8z68 mboard, 16g of ram. CS5.

When I use another program for video conversion, it uses 100% of my cpu.

When I use prpro, it uses only 25 to 40% of the CPU,

Is it possible to implement the prpro so that it uses more than the power of the computer for rendering? -Thanks!

PP will always use what it takes.  There is no setting for this.  If the CPU usage is less than 100%, it's because PP doesn't have all the resources.  This could be for several reasons.  If you use hardware acceleration, some work is credited to the GPU.  Or if your discs are not fast enough to feed the data flow, or if you have third-party effects that are rendered on the GPU, things can slow down.

Bottom line, is that there is nothing that you can do within the PP to the CPU usage to recover.  PP will use what suits him.

Tags: Premiere

Similar Questions

  • 10 ColdFusion does not seem to use all 8 cores (2 physical cpu on physical hardware)

    Our Standard 10 Coldfusion server is not higher than 25% never dope.

    I have a time hard to believe that we write this incredibly excellent code to have more than 100 users never do our server over 25% spike...

    How can I check to see how many CPU is using ColdFusion or the number of processors it will use?

    Thank you!

    One of the ways of loading CF with use is to use Apache JMeter. Reference:
    https://JMeter.Apache.org/

    Briefly. In Jmeter to Test Plan, add Threads (users) then thread group.
    In the Group of threads add Sampler HTTP Request.
    Inside the Group of threads increases the number of Threads 1 to 30 of say.
    Change the HTTP request to include the server name or IP of FC
    Port 80 or 8500 for example function built in CF webserver or IIS / Apache.
    Path to the CFM file your going to use it.

    Press the Stop Go.

    HTH, Carl M.

  • Fusion 5 in Mavericks using only 1 core processor?

    I've recently updated to the Mavericks (because good, free) and I noticed that my Windows 8 VM is a bit clumsy and slow at the same time. I noticed that this happens when the malware Windows Service is running. This never happened before because I have the virtual machine worth use 2 (of 4) carrots. However, it seems that there is only 1 kernel used because the Task Manager shows only 1 CPU.

    Can anyone confirm my suspicions or has anyone seen other similar behavior?

    I know I should just upgrade to VMWare 6, but I'm waiting for them to offer more reasonable upgrade prices. Tired to pay almost full price just to maintain the Fusion works when we get free updates from Apple. I hope that we will see something on Black Friday.

    I think I solved my problems. I have closed the comments, edited the settings for:

    1 disable 3d acceleration

    2 remove all shared folders.

    One of those who did the trick. I'm guessing it's the latter.

    I hope this helps someone!

  • SOUL using only 1 core

    I recently changed from Premiere Elements to Premiere Pro, so I'm new to the Media Encoder.

    Problem: It is extremely slow, for example making more than 2 hours on a sequence of 14 minutes, not too compex.

    On a Windows 7 (64-bit) PC with an Intel core-i7, 8 cores @ 2.8 GHz, 12 GB of RAM,

    GPU: nVidia GeForce GTX 770, latest drivers, Cuda enabled in Premiere Pro + TEA.

    1080p@30fps, 2-pass VBR, H.264, 15 to 25 Mbps

    So now, I have detected, that the SOUL is just with 1 bit on 8, others almost inactive.

    Premiere Pro is closed, no other big programms running who could 'gather' processor cores.

    But when I directly in Premiere Pro (do not use the queue feature), encoding is WAY faster--about 45 minutes for the same project.

    Because Premiere Pro use all 8 cores and the GPU.

    As I could not find the settings in the SOUL on the parameters of the stress system or something, I now wonder what the problem is.

    I want to use the functionality of queue of the SOUL, but the speed is also very important.

    Anyone who can help?

    Thanks in advance!

    We look at this issue now.  To work around this problem, please try running SOUL body before.  For now, please use this workaround that worked for many users.

  • Workstation 7.1 - distribution of cores/processors and nets for guests

    Hello

    Exactly, which is allocated by the parameters 'number of processors' and 'number of CPU cores? The first Option allocates threads (virtual processors) and the second the cores include 2 sons?

    Not very useful to me on page 81 and 367 manual ist. Is there a better source?

    Story: I am about to buy a new laptop that has a core i5 or i7 with two hearts and I think only 4 wires. Now I wonder if I can run two virtual machines at the same time, and how the settings are to do, if I want to allocate:

    (a) the base (or two threads) to a virtual computer

    (b) a wire to a virtual computer

    (c) a single thread to the host...

    is is possible or do I have TO allocate two virtual machines for the same kernel?

    thx for the help

    andyt25 wrote:

    Hello

    Exactly, which is allocated by the parameters 'number of processors' and 'number of CPU cores? The first Option allocates threads (virtual processors) and the second the cores include 2 sons?

    When you create a virtual guest machine, you can choose how many virtual processors (vCPU) there.  If you choose to give it 2 or more vCPUs then the options you listed above control how VMware presents these vCPUs to the guest operating system.

    For example, if you choose to give a comment 2 vCPU, then you can either have VMware to present the guest with 2 core processors (virtual) or a single processor dual-core (virtual).  Things performance will be the same, but this option exists because some software are allowed on a base by processor (instead of a per-core) so there may be an advantage permitted to configure your comments in a special way.

    The settings above have no effect on how VMware plans to run on your host CPU processes.  By default, VMware will use all the cores available host regardless of how you configure the options above when creating your guests.

    Now, with all this talk about several vCPU invited road, I should mention that my experience you will have the best performance if you set up your guests with a unique vCPU.   In a virtualized environment, multiple vCPU / customer does not necessarily in the best performance.  I strongly suggest you create your guests with 1 vCPU and only increase their number of vCPU if tests show that the performance is increased.

    You will certainly be able to run several clients at once on your host computer.  If you persevere with 1 vCPU invited, you will almost certainly run in performance RAM problems or disk well until you encounter problems CPU host.

  • Quad Core processors

    If my server ESXi has a Quad core processor - y at - it all improvenent of performance that can be achieved specifically chosen to assign 4 processors to a Server 2003 VM or if I just leave it to 1 core, ESXi will use all four cores to my best advantage?

    Does make a difference?

    best practice is to always start with 1vCPU and work your way to the top.  You can usually find 1vCPU will be enough.  From there, you would go to to 2vCPU.  I don't think that 4 is a good idea.

  • P70 won't turn on all 4 cores

    Cannot get my xeon E3 - 1505M to turn on all 4 cores, even when it is plugged. All power settings are high-performance

    BIOS 2.06

    Go to MSCONFIG

    Start-> advanced-> check number of processors-> 4

    Select the option «Allow all parameters start» permanent

    Ok

    You have to do all of this, however. Leaving the number of processors box unchecked should allow Windows to use all available resources.

    How determine you that you are using only 2 hearts? Did you use HWINFO64? That should show you all the carrots that are currently running.

  • Vista Business 64-Bit with AutoCAD 2009 does not seem to use all 8 GB of RAM available.

    A workstation newly built (S5000XVN Intel / Xeon / 8 GB RAM / 2 GB RAM video) with Windows Vista Business 64-bit is used with AutoCAD 2009 (64-bit).  The workstation hangs under stress, apparently because not enough RAM is available.  ("Stress" is "Turning entirely made of a certain complexity 3D drawings")

    The Task Manager / Performance tab indicates never to use RAM above about 3.25 GB, even if ten or more concurrent applications are loaded, including IE 8 (6 graphically heavy windows) and AutoCAD with 6 or more complex drawings open at the same time.

    There are two issues, I think:
    1. in the event that a busy workstation indicate use RAM above the 32-old bit of 3.2 GB limit?
    2 are there MS Windows Vista settings that are necessary to ensure the use of RAM available?

    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks for the reply.

    I studied the installation of AutoCAD 2009.  It's actually the 64-bit version that is installed, and the Task Manager reports it as a 64-bit application when it runs.  (In other words, it is not marked as a 32 bit application.)

    I must admit that I no longer believe that the machine is running out of resources or do not use all the resources available to it.  We tested the machine by throwing 18 complex, fully rendering the 3D drawings within the Academy, in addition to two cases of IE 8, three instances of Explorer Windows and MS Windows Mail.  Use of the RAM did climb, reaching finally the 4.06 GB, clearly indicating that the 32-bit 3.2 GB limit has been exceeded.  It seems that just drawings don't take up that much RAM.  BTW, there was no increase in the paging activity that I could see.

    However, the application does not seem to be frozen or looping when the client attempted to turn one of the drawings.  The CPU on the two wires (Xeon processor) usage increased to 55% and remained there. the State of the process, as reported by the task manager went to "Not responding" and stayed there; and the display of the image froze on an empty workspace, with a three seconds flash drawing on every 20 seconds.

    So: It now seems that there is a problem with AutoCAD, not a Vista problem.  I would appreciate comments, however, if you think that this analysis is wrong, incomplete or based on wrong assumptions.

    Thanks for your help.

  • BlackBerry smartphones ' you have used all your available device pin changes for your My World account.

    I recently replaced my BB Tour Sprint with Sprint, and when you try to reinstall my apps world bought for BB looks like this: "you have used all your available device pin changes for your My World account.» I'm getting this error when I try to use my BB Tour with the NEW PIN {led by privacy}, the email account used is {under the direction of privacy} a way to solve this issue? I had a few exchanges with Sprint, because Tour trackball problems. I enjoy using App World, however I can't buy something again or recover my previous purchases with this error. My previous PIN is 30BE5BD9 (I got to the list because the BB tech support link listed my new PIN invalid - as well as my old pin code). Please notify.

    PS: Crackberry App World made a PIN exchange a simple question - simply plug your new PIN and you can easily recover your purchased applications. RIM's App World support really dropped the ball on this one - there are a lot of tricks of BB exchanged and this App World problem really needs to be rectified. There were already several messages on this forum about it, and the owners are not able to submit their complaint to the BB technical support because the link would not accept their new PIN! Shame on you RIM.

    Hello!

    There is actually a fix for all your questions, but the first that needs to be fixed is the answer to bad PIN code on the RIM support site. However, this hotfix cannot be displayed publicly. Therefore, please check your private Messages on this site for a PM from me with these instructions.

    BTW - if you think also that your message has been changed by the mods to delete any personal information (pines, e-mail addresses, etc.). .. as a public forum, it is generally not a good idea to post them here. In addition, these forums are a user to channel... support not a portal user-to-RIM...

    See you soon!

  • ESXI 4.1, 348481 Question about data store, not be able to use all the free space?

    I am working on installing ESXi 4.1 on a Dell R710 with 3.7 to with SATA, RAID 5 disks. My problem is when I'm going to create my store of data it shows I have 3.7 TB of free space. I told him to use all but the data store comes out 1.63 TB. I deleted that and made a 1 TB data store, but when I went to create a new one he would not give me the ability to use the remaining free space. I'm really green when it comes to the implementation of VMWARE for any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Thank you, Don

    Hello.

    The maximum size for a single volume must be 2 TB - 512 bytes, as described in KB 3371739.  Use the RAID Dell utilities to carve up the storage volumes of that size or smaller.

    Good luck!

  • Improve a simple select query that uses all the lines.

    Hi all

    Excuse me if the question is too dumb. Here is my code
    SQL> select * from v$version;
    
    BANNER
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    CORE    10.2.0.1.0      Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.07
    SQL> show parameter optim
    
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
    object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.1
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
    optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
    plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
    
    SQL> explain plan for select SUM(decode(transaction_type,'D',txn_amount,0)) payments_reversals,
      2          SUM(decode(transaction_type,'C',txn_amount,0)) payments,primary_card_no,statement_date
      3             from credit_card_pymt_dtls  group by primary_card_no,statement_date;
    
    Explained.
    
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -----------------------------------
    Plan hash value: 2801218574
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id  | Operation          | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |                       |  1912K|    56M|       | 21466   (3)| 00:04:18 |
    |   1 |  SORT GROUP BY     |                       |  1912K|    56M|   161M| 21466   (3)| 00:04:18 |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| CREDIT_CARD_PYMT_DTLS |  1912K|    56M|       |  4863   (3)| 00:00:59 |
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    9 rows selected.
    
    SQL> select index_name,index_type
      2  from all_indexes
      3  where table_name = 'CREDIT_CARD_PYMT_DTLS';
    
    INDEX_NAME                     INDEX_TYPE
    ------------------------------ --------------------
    INDX_TRANTYPE                  BITMAP
    INDX_PCARD                     NORMAL
    INDX_PSTATEMENT_DATE           NORMAL
    The query uses all records in the CREDIT_CARD_PYMT_DTLS table. Transaction type will be either 'C' or '.

    CREDIT_CARD_PYMT_DTLS has 2 million lines and the qury will display 1.5 million lines. Table statisticas are up to date.

    The query takes now almost 5 minutes. Y thaere a way to reduce the time?

    Our DB server has 8 processors and 8 GB of memory. Is it authentic?

    Thanks in advance.

    Published by: user11115924 on April 29, 2009 02:43
    All columns used in the query are already indexed. (Of course, not only for this query.)

    I should not get too hung up the full Table Scan necessarily - Oracle makes a decision, and even with your new index, he still thinks it is the most effective way to recover the data.

    Did you collect statistics on this new index?

    You have created the index with:

    TO_CHAR("STATEMENT_DATE",'MON-RRRR')
    

    Yet, you seem to be just by selecting statement_date in your query: Oracle cannot use the index (according to functions) in this case!

    If you have only a small number of columns in this table, you can consider an Table of Index organized (ITO), then the table itself is a clue.

    I'd be more inclined to optimize the complete analysis of the table and the creation of other clues, I would say, have you tried the PARALLEL tip?

  • 13 Firefox works in multithreaded mode and it can use the quad-core processors?

    When you buy a new PC, we choose between dual core vs quad core processors, and some people claim that Firefox work mode multithreaded mulch and treats each tab in a separate process and may fully use the advantage of a quad-core processor. Is this true?

    Firefox does not treat each tab in a separate process. If this can be a function in the future, I don't know of any plans to introduce any time soon. Obviously, buying a quad core processor will be significantly faster than a dual core, and your browser is usually less consume a lot of resources than other programs. I would not use it as your buying decision. Firefox will work just as well on a dual-core or a quad-core, but windows and other programs will work better with 4 cores.

  • ITunes is downloading all items purchased from my iPhone, including tv shows and movies, using all the memory and batteries

    ITunes is downloading all items purchased from my iPhone, including tv shows and movies, using all the memory and batteries, does anyone know how to stop this?

    Hi anthony248,

    If you don't want the automatic downloads enabled on your iPhone, follow the steps outlined in the article below, except that you will turn off the switch rather than turn them on.  I'll also include a link about the storage capacity of your iPhone and how to delete items that you don't want.

    Turn on automatic downloads

    Check your storage space on your iPhone, iPad and iPod touch

    Take care

  • Why my iPhone 6 uses all my space when I'm not using it?

    I used my iPhone 6 16 GB since November 2015 and from the beginning I place no problem, now it says I used all of the memory on my phone when I never even did use! Help, please!

    Using features like photo stream? If so, try disabling the photo stream on iCloud and recheck your free space.

    You connect your phone to iTunes and take a look at the bar of storage at the bottom? The section 'Other' is larger than 2 GB? In this case, restoration could take back wasted space.

    What is 'Other' and what I can do Abo...

  • My iPad that I used all my concerts and I have even an application please help me.i want to replay the shock of the clans.

    I used all of my concert and I have not yet told MY ipad! Please help I don't want to reset my iPad so I loose all my data gamecenter games.

    Hello

    Try a reboot press & hold the power button / stop & menu button

    Hold both for 30 seconds.

    You won't lose any data.

    See you soon

    Brian

Maybe you are looking for